No Biology/Culture Ideology has a Right to Demand Absorption of their Systemic Terror-Genocide

I owe my existence as do hundreds related to me to an old Wiradjuri woman known by the family ascribed name Bessie, who came to warn my GG Grandmother at Gobarralong in1852 the Murrumbidgee flood was to rise much further and faster than previously experienced. “Missus…Get up hill, fast”, she insisted they must leave immediately to higher ground to save her 10 children with one on the way, two dogs, a cat, a cow, and a horse. It was said my GG Grandmother “had been on the Murrumbidgee for ten years. They knew you had to trust the aborigines. Especially about the weather and the river.” They took what they could in a wheelbarrow and a bucket of hot coals. Through the darkening drizzling sky, ankle deep in squelching mud, apart from a toddler being dropped twice, “Blessed Mary!”, “Holy Mother of God!”, grabbed, “Thank God!” in a flowing waist deep creek crossing they made it to high ground. The house was washed away. GG grandfather who had gone to Gundagai approximately 54 kilometres down...

“Open the Gates!” “Look it is an open-hearted, generous, reconciliation gesture.” “Simple” “Open the Gates!” Simple we are told. Simplicity mantra of a scam artist. “Keep the Gates Closed!” “Look it is a dangerous scam necessitating being hidden behind the usual open-hearted, generous, reconciliation gesture facade” “Simple” “Keep the Gates Closed!”  VOTENO. When anyone says, ‘Simple just sign yes here, you do not have to worry about the fine print or future consequences that will sort out by themselves. This is just a simple change to your foundation document the constitution.’ Citizens are seriously advised to say No. For under every such simplicity resides a shark fest of complexity. To claim any change to our constitution is simplicity should immediately have the fire bells ringing. Being first over a geographical line, being resident in one place for a million years or a month and being subject as we all have to colonisation does not bestow inalienable rights to anything....

No citizen should have more rights to influence policy than any other citizen.  It becomes a tyranny of the few against the interests of the many which is an antitheists  to what a Democracy represents. Does the world care about what Australia thinks about them? No. So why would we care what the world thinks about us? Indeed the point is to create a politic that works for Australia, not for the world at large. As with the claims the Voice will solve anything there is no evidence to support the claim. As it is with the claim voting no will ruin our world reputation there is no evidence to support the claim. "[...] Cape York communities reel from gang-rape of a five-year-old boy in July and signs of a resurgence of youth sexual violence [...]  violence there forced closure of the local school and evacuation of teaching staff [...] He highlighted the importance of reducing sexual violence for the future of Aboriginal communities." 'Restore axed youth sex violence plan', ...

Socialization and hegemonic power G. John Ikenberry and Charles A. Kupchan Most historical ages are marked by the presence of great powers, nations capable of dominating the course of international politics. An ongoing task of scholarship is to explore the nature of the shadow that hegemonic nations cast. How do hegemons assert control over other nations within the international system? Through what mechanisms does control get established, and by what processes does it erode? How is compliance achieved, and how is it maintained? Most observers would argue that the manipulation of material incentives, the use of threats and promises to alter the preferences of leaders in secondary nations-is the dominant form through which hegemonic power is exercised. Power is directly related to the command of material resources. Acquiescence is the result of coercion. Inducements and sanctions are used by the hegemon to ensure that secondary states prefer cooperation to nonc...