To whom it may concern: Time for a Royal Commission to determine if it is possible for the Islamic/Muslim culture to ‘reconcile itself with modernity' so as to prevent terror-genocide against Other cultures

To whom it may concern: Time for a Royal Commission
Muhammad's Quran 002:018 "They (Other/out-groups) are utterly deaf, dumb, and blind; they can no longer recover." - It appears Muhammad at the time must have been looking deeply into a very black mirror as Other/out-groups can clearly understand why and who is culpable for the terror-genocide systemically derived from the so called Islamic/Muslim cultures non-radicalised, 'moderate', law abiding families, communities and institutional ranks, as culture creates an individual's ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology not an individual. Cultures deliver terror, their tool the altruistic 'few' derived from the 'many'. The 'few' come into existence for a cultural purpose not of their own making otherwise the 'few' would never come into existence to behave as they do.
Disturbed - "The Sound Of Silence" Conan O'Brien 3/28/2016

"The case carries monumental importance for Indonesia, and sends a worrisome signal about the political and social trajectory of Australia's most significant neighbour."
Indonesia tested by the raging mob, The Age, 
DECEMBER 17 2016

I am here to disturb the silence to share the voices that no one dares to share not of right-wing fanatics, an inevitable reactionary symptom of the current political/sociological paradigm utilised to achieve the impossible of having cultures with significantly different political/social ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology exist in the same societal space despite clear historical and current evidence to the contrary, but of the voices of millions upon millions of ordinary us, the professionals even in our psychology fraternity who know the truth but dare not speak it for fear of what we can all see happens under the existent sociological hypocrisy of the 'unasked question' endemic in our State institutions, universities derived no doubt from the best intent of historic and philosophical reflection but tragically based upon false unquestioned assumptions and as such the reactionary behavior towards those who dissent and challenge these false unquestioned assumptions of belief systems based upon lies is the usual response inherent in a theocratic template of unquestioned faith blasphemy.

"..I think it’s blasphemous to the extent that I can comment on someone else’s religion." Director General of ASIO, Duncan LewisTerror alert: Australia’s top spy chief warns rift with Muslims could weaken national security December 13, 2015 Samantha Maiden,National Political Editor, The Sunday Telegraph

'our democratic scheme is at stake' Duncan Lewis - Imagine for Yourself the Images a Society Has Informed or Will Inform when a Society Accepts Blasphemy as a Normative Paradigm Within its Midst.

When one sees/hears this accusation of blasphemy anywhere being made against another human the hairs on the back of one's head either stand and there is a chance the tide may be turned or if there is no immediate physiological/cognitive response at all of fear of what such an accusation of blasphemy represents in reality it is then too late, the 'Tranquility of Silence' so prized by the Islamic/Muslim Iranian political/social elite has been realised or about to be either directly by Islamic/Muslim cultures terror-genocide, the rational fear of what the Islamic/Muslim culture can and will do, or indirectly with the Islamic/Muslim 'Tranquility of Silence' enforced through their surrogates in Other cultures, the dangerous inept intellectual/political elite cultural gatekeepers who insist upon continued utilisation of a failed political/sociological paradigm as the bloodied bodies in our streets clearly provide proof, to which their reply of assurance is the usual 'It could have been worse without us in charge." and so it comes to pass.

Given Belgium, Syria, New York, Boston,... Turkey and how many other times and spaces which prove cultures can and do represent significantly different risks to Other cultures and religions nor their adherents are guided by Divine Grace alone but Divine Vengeance as well, surely means Freedom of Religion has failed and clearly needs challenging? Why should any society give equal protection to a culture which systemically delivers terror-genocide via their culturally created and sustained 'violent, radical, fanatical, nihilists'?

It is appalling humanity have experienced Islamic/Muslim cultural derived terror-genocide against Other cultures from the seventh century to this very day and yet we have heads of security services of the very cultures targeted for such terror-genocide defending the very culture, the Islamic/Muslim culture, delivering it to their own culture's doorsteps it is beyond sickening.

MPs unanimously declare Yazidis and Christians victims of Isis genocide,  Patrick Wintour Diplomatic editor, The Guardian, 21 April 2016

"The Armenian Genocide was a systematic attempt to remove a people that many historians say was the first massive ethnic cleansing of the 20th Century. From 1915 to 1923, as many as 1.5 million Christian Armenians were killed under Ottoman (Islamic/Muslim) rule."
Armenian Genocide essay wins Mich. student national award 
 Ann Zaniewski, Detroit Free Press Education Writer,  April 19, 2016

"In AD 627, Muhammad committed an atrocity against the last remaining major tribe of Jews in Medina: the Qurayza.
He beheaded the men and the pubescent boys and enslaved the women and children. In doing this, he wiped an entire tribe "off the map".." 
Muhammad’s atrocity against the Qurayza Jews by James M. Arlandson

"It is very clear what I mean, which is that there is a violent, radical, fanatical, nihilistic interpretation of Islam by a faction … within the Muslim community that is our enemy, and that has to be defeated."
Obama: To Stop Terrorism Islam Must Reconcile Itself To Modernity April 4, 2016 by Michael Stone

 “We are not required to apologise on behalf of a lunatic,” The spiritual leader of Australia's Muslims Professor Ibrahim Abu Mohamed

Yes Ibrahim Abu Mohamed you are required to apologise on behalf of a culture whose cultures development process infant-child-adolescent-adult systemically produces "violent, radical, fanatical, nihilistic lunatics" from generation to generation with a reactive behavior against Other significantly greater than Other cultures.

Bangladeshi university professor hacked to death in Rajshahi BBC, 23/4/2016
Gunman kills Dutch film director BBC 
2 November, 2004

"The findings of the study indicate that citizens (Hofstede and Hofstede (2005)) of Islamic countries share similar cultural values that vary significantly with those of the Western countries."
Conceptualizing the Islamic Personality Model, Abdul Kadir Othman, Muhammad Iskandar Hamzah, Nurhazirah Hashim, Faculty of Business Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

And so it continues, as it must as the Islamic/Muslim codex (text and exemplar (messianic) template) the source of Muslim ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology have not changed so remains significantly different than the Other cultures ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology. 

The 'many' non-radicalised, 'moderate', law abiding families, communities, institutions continue therefore to create and sustain the  "violent, radical, fanatical, nihilistic" 'few' from their 'many' ranks to enforce via violence or the threat of it internal Islamic/Muslim adherence and Other cultures compliance to accepting however onerous in terms of murdered Other in their streets and vast redirection of scarce resources simply for protecting Other cultures from the Islamic/Muslim culture, a significant violent Islamic/Muslim 'rational' model in the same societal space as their own.

Is the loss of just a single child and the unfathomable grief it tragically brings to a mother, to a father, to a sister, to a brother, to a nation, worth continuing to 'manage' the Islamic/Muslim cultures systemic terror-genocide and misogyny into our Public Square to enable such insidious Muslim behavior to escalate be it delivered from the 'few' 'true believers' or by the 'many' non radicalised, 'moderate' law abiding from whose ranks the 'few' are consistently created generation after generation?

No culture has a right to visit terror-genocide against another culture nor to inform a subject state for women - be it perpetrated by the 'few' sourced from the 'many' or the 'few' in time as elsewhere becoming the 'many'.
Time for a Royal Commission -“Obama has argued that there will be no comprehensive solution to Islamist terrorism until Islam reconciles itself to modernity”  

A Royal Commission is urgently required to determine if it is possible for the Islamic/Muslim culture to ‘reconcile itself with modernity’ and as Islamic/Muslim terror-genocide against Other will continue according to Obama if it cannot what steps must the Australian Government take to remove a cultural codex informing terror-genocide against humanity from our private and public spheres so as to have the Islamic/Muslim culture cease informing terror-genocide against not only Australian citizens but citizens of other nations as well.
"Obama has argued that there will be no comprehensive solution to Islamist terrorism until Islam reconciles itself to modernity and undergoes some of the reforms that have changed Christianity"
Obama: To Stop Terrorism Islam Must Reconcile Itself To Modernity April 4, 2016 by Michael Stone
Obama leaves out a critical urgent Question. Given the Islamic/Muslim codex (textual and exemplar (messianic) template) where the categorisation of ‘innocent’ determines Other cultures not ‘innocent’ is it even possible the Islamic/Muslim culture can be ‘reformed’?
From the very first pages of the Islamic/Muslim codex onwards determines members of Other cultures not ‘innocent’ as evil, deaf, dumb and blind unable to be convinced of the error of their ways, untrustworthy, to be shunned lied to, and rightfully destined for ‘Divine vengeance/retribution’ ‘grievous harm’ or ‘severest penalty’ with graphic details of how this is to be carried out, actions explicitly followed even to this very day and analogised to utilise modern weapons.
The exact same categorisation engine template of Other cultures in Mohammed’s Quran is to be found in Hitler’s Mein Kampf and humanity excuse the inevitable outcomes of such a cultural template of horror for a religious construct and yet hold ALL the adherents accountable as they must for secular construct informing terror-genocide –Why? Are the victim’s less worthy of justice being served against the perpetrating culture?
The Muslim terror and a related deaths as we have seen elsewhere in the world have started in Australian streets, clearly Australian policy, despite the claims of our politicians, have failed to protect Australian citizens for Australian streets have three victims of Muslim terror to prove these inept cultural gatekeepers have failed and the terror situation is getting worse even by their own estimation.
How many Australian bloodied bodies do our inept cultural gatekeepers believe will determine their policy a failure? None. As Australian citizens are not only told by these inept cultural gatekeepers after each and every atrocity but the very culture delivering the terror-genocide the so called ‘moderate’ Islamic/Muslim culture “It could have been worse if we had not been in charge.” Also Australian citizens are told by our similarly inept terror ‘experts’ of our ‘Expert Age’ Australian citizens have to simply accept terror as a part of our multiculturalism lives. And if this were not enough the very victims Other cultures are determined as being responsible for the very terror perpetrated against them by our very own ‘expert’ intellectual elite.
“In fact, if the extremist’s elements had prevailed. I have not the least doubt that disruption would have been more drastic and that we should have real reason by now to fear German aggression from both a military as well as political point of view.” Norman Hillson, “I speak of Germany”, London 1937
"We have to grow with the threat, and we have to do it in a confident manner,” Professor Siracusa said.
Two Sydney schools in lockdown as police unions call for support against extremists SBS 20 OCT 2015
"We have to stop with this debate of neutrality and secularity in Belgium and recognise and accept our multicultural society in all its manifestations. Not just when we want to drink mint tea or eat Turkish pita." sociologist Corinne Torrekens, a specialist in Muslim communities at the Free University of Brussels.
Terror sparks integration debate in France, Belgium, DW, Elizabeth Bryant, Molenbeek/Sevran,  05.04.2016
"It's not a question of Muslims being integrated, it's that society isn't integrating Muslims," says Alexandre Piettre, a sociologist at the Societies, Religions and Secularism Group, a Paris-based think-tank.
Terror sparks integration debate in France, Belgium, DW, Elizabeth Bryant, Molenbeek/Sevran,  05.04.2016
“The "complete failure" of prison managers to share critical information with the rest of the staff is to blame for a brutal attack allegedly carried out by an Islamic State supporter on his cell mate, the prison officers' union says.”
Prison managers' failure to share information led to brutal jail attack: union Inga Ting, SMH, April 10, 2016
"Violent extremism is the common challenges of all religions: Buddha, Christianity, Hindu, Islam and all faiths."
Indonesia labels former prime minister Tony Abbott's critique of Islam 'unhelpful' and 'divisive' By political reporter Anna Henderson ABC 10 Dec 2015
“NSW Corrective Services Commissioner Peter Severin speaks to Sunrise about the growing concern of radicalisation in our jails.”
Maximum security terror Sunrise 11/4/2016
The point is not, if any group, culture or nation informs extreme violence for invariably violence of some sort or another may occur in most human groups whatever the ideology ethics and values it contains, it is the relative degree any group, culture or nation informs extreme violence and if it is systemically created from indoctrination processes of the group, culture or nation

To insist we should ignore the presence of a culture informing systemic terror because Other cultures may have been know in the past to do so, yet no longer do, or Other cultures may inform from time to time statistically a terror outlier, not a systemic informing of terror, is the same rationale, logic as determining one should accept into one's home a domesticated cat who may scratch you rarely, on an equal basis as a tiger who eats one of your family members each week, and if you refuse you are determined as having catophobia-ailurophobia a mental illness and even possibly be determined a criminal by a society's judicial system.
The question is, is it inevitable such a group, culture or nation does, will inform terror-genocide against Other. If it was truly the case ‘all religions’ ‘all cultures’ inform ‘violent extremism’ at the same level of social hostility which is reflective of the systemic level of ‘violent extremism’ informed by the Islamic/Muslim religion then one would have a justification to ignore the bloody bodies in the streets because we are as cultures all equally to blame. Mere observation determines we are not equally to blame for it would mean all Other cultures via their cultural indoctrination and categorisation engines would be informing the exact same level of terror-genocide not only against the Islamic/Muslim culture but their own adherents to the degree the Islamic/Muslim culture does. 

If Other cultures are not informing the same level of terror-genocide, and clearly some Other cultures are informing no terror at all, then clearly the Islamic/Muslim culture cannot be excused its culpability simply because falsely it is claimed "All Other cultures do it why pick on the Islamic/Muslim culture." when clearly they all do not, nor if they do it is at anywhere near the level of violence perpetrated in quantity and ferocity of the Islamic/Muslim culture which requires a huge misdirection of resources better spent on improving humanities circumstance than simply being required to build security apparatus and walls to protect ourselves from such a diabolical cultural construct, and very importantly does one evil really excuse another and therefore cultures must not be held accountable for the evil they inform however horrific? Is "They do it." even if it was true which it is not any reason not to forcefully hold a perpetrator of violence in this case a culture to account?
Religious Hostilities High in 57% of Muslim-Majority Countries 2012 
09/22/2014 Source data PEW Research Center - Commentary Weekly Number Brian J. Grim, Ph.D. 
Religious hostilities are sweeping the globe, despite efforts by governments, religious groups and non-governmental organizations to hold them back.
According to the Pew Research Centre, religious hostilities reached a six-year high in 2012, with a third (33%) of countries in the high category, up from 20% just six years earlier.

The Islamic world is disproportionately affected. More than one-in-two (57%) Muslim-majority countries have high religious hostilities, more than double that of other countries (25%), as shown in the chart to the left.

Although religious hostilities affect countries throughout the world experience, Muslim-majority countries consistently have higher levels of a range of religious hostilities than other countries and by wide margins. For instance, Muslim-majority countries are more than three times more likely than other countries to have religion-related war, terror or sectarian violence, as shown in the chart below.

These religious hostilities disrupt markets, trade and development in numerous parts of the Islamic World. This leads the talented young as well as risk-averse investors to look elsewhere for opportunity, compounding socio-economic conditions that contribute to the hostilities.

By contrast, research indicates that economic competitiveness is stronger in countries where religious freedom is respected by governments and societies.

Also it is clear not ‘all religions’ ‘all cultures’ react in the same way from being marginalised, lack wealth, lack opportunity, …If this was the case every religion and culture wherever these negative social factors were to occur, even in Muslim dominated countries, where Other are clearly marginalised politically would inform the same level of terror, social hostility not only in their own local space but elsewhere as the Islamic/Muslim culture clearly does – this is not occurring therefore Muslims being marginalised, lack wealth, lack opportunity, is not the core reason why the Islamic/Muslim culture visits terror-genocide upon Other in fact as indicated above it is the Islamic/Muslim cultures propensity to inform terror which is a main cause of a lack of prosperity or potential prosperity insecurity and terror do not encourage internal or external investment. It is correlation invalidly associated with cause which may have more to do with not wanting to participate in ‘Western Culture’ rather than being purposefully excluded from it.
“Mr Neumann (director of London's International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation) , speaking last month at the White House Summit to Counter Violent Extremism, touched on a somewhat overlooked aspect of the debate about radicalisation: while marginalisation and a lack of employment or education are common factors among young Western extremists, they are not always present.”
Why are young Australians being drawn to Islamic State? The causes and ways of combating the threat of radicalisation ABC, By Paul Donoughue and Lucy Fahey

"Literature on aggression often suggests that individual deficiencies, such as social incompetence, psychological difficulties, or troublesome home environments, are responsible for aggressive behavior. In this article, by contrast, we examine aggression from a social network perspective, arguing that social network centrality, our primary measure of peer status, increases the capacity for aggression and that competition to gain or maintain status motivates its use. We test these arguments using a unique longitudinal dataset that enables separate consideration of same- and cross-gender aggression. We find that aggression is generally not a maladjusted reaction typical of the socially marginal; instead, aggression is intrinsic to status and escalates with increases in peer status until the pinnacle of the social hierarchy is attained. Over time, individuals at the very bottom and those at the very top of a hierarchy become the least aggressive youth. We also find that aggression is influenced not so much by individual gender differences as by relationships with the other gender and patterns of gender segregation at school. When cross-gender interactions are plentiful, aggression is diminished. Yet these factors are also jointly implicated in peer status: in schools where cross-gender interactions are rare, cross-gender friendships create status distinctions that magnify the consequences of network centrality."
Status Struggles, Network Centrality and Gender Segregation in Same- and Cross-Gender Aggression, Robert Faris, Diane Felmlee, American Sociological Review February 2011 vol. 76 no. 1 48-73

The research and data above determines the following quote as an outright lie and the promise "eliminating the social frustrations" will lead to a resolution of Islamic/Muslim "radicalism and extremism." in a "long, on-going and slow process" whilst Other cultures will have terror-genocide visited upon them is grotesque basis upon which to allow a culture to continue systemically delivering terror-genocide against Other cultures along with tragic misogynistic outcomes for women. Why should Other cultures have to wait for what in reality, if research is anything to go by, is impossible to achieve? 

"A majority of the delegates at the Religion Against Terrorism conference expressed similar sentiments, agreeing that interreligious and inter-parliamentary dialogue were key weapons in the long, on-going and slow process of eliminating the social frustrations that help spawn radicalism and extremism."
Religious, political leaders denounce terrorism at Kazakhstan conference, By James Russo. May 31, 2016,

What also has to be revealed as a lie is the core cause of ‘radicalisation’, specific places, specific people i.e. particular mosques, jails, schools, hate preachers, etc as these altruistic aligners/enforcers/punishers have to already have had their prejudice levels set to enable the ‘few’ to swing the sword and pull the trigger as research in Indonesia found there is no dramatic leap from one state of a non-radicalised, ‘moderate’, law abiding Muslim to a terrorist the Islamic/Muslim cultural rationale justification and authorisation to commit murder against Other cultures is already set it has to be for a person to transition to terror in a jail, on the Internet or anywhere else.
There may be outliers of adherents of Other cultures becoming Muslim terrorists but even then the concept of Other being less and justifiably destined for severest penalty may be found as a cultural construct in their previous culture which may or may not have cultural justification nor degree of ferocity against Other cultures adherents their adopted Islamic/Muslim religion enables. And this is the critical point the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex categorisation engine enables such systemic violence terror-genocide on such a scale to be realised either by the converted or already Muslims themselves. 

Logically, rationally the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex which enables such behaviour has to be removed from private and public spheres so it does not inform the initial levels and types of prejudice which enable the ‘few’ to come into existence from the ‘many’s’ ranks to move inexorably to terror as they have always done and will do if nothing changes.
Also it is inferred this is a ‘young’ disease all you have to do is give them a good talking to, and stop them getting on the Internet where we are falsely informed it only takes a week to radicalise a person, this could be quickly be disproven by taking a statistically appropriate number of ‘young’ from all cultures have them exposed to the exact same viewing/interaction of a ‘young’ Muslim who ‘only took a week to be radicalised’ to prove such a claim ridiculous and for any psychologist to determine such can be achieved without cultural pre-priming with appropriate constructs of Other cultures is a liar and should be struck off from the profession.
It is the Muslim adults already in place and the cultural codex they adhere to which gives direction as to what the Muslim behaviour regards Other cultures should be and what type of behaviour should be rewarded and deemed as ‘true believer' status and therefore not only what ethics-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology the ‘young’ will follow but the ‘old’ as well, for the Islamic/Muslim culture as any culture are only interested in realising their worldview a design derived directly from the Islamic/Muslim codex, necessarily achieved due to the nature of the Islamic/Muslim codex over the bloody bodies of Other cultures. To assume it is only the 'young' which are the problem regards the development of systemic terrorist behavior in any culture is to determine an infant-child-adolescent actually invents their own cultural ethics-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology. 
As time passes as we can see even with AL Qaeda who are now determined ‘moderate’ compared to Islamic State what was once determined as ‘extreme’ becomes ‘moderate’ we continue to forget that we described the behaviour of the now ‘moderate’ in the exact same extremist labels we apply to a new ‘name’ produced by the same culture for the same behaviour. Yet we do not see and act immediately against a culture whose words and behavior provide a clear warning of what history determines will occur in the future.  

Words as we are told by our inept gatekeepers are not benign and are written and said to result in action yet they condemn the very words said to determine a culture are systemically informing terror and selectively praise words in the cultural codex of the culture informing terror, ignoring the words within the codex publicly espoused by the cultures leaders which create the cultural categorisation engine the actual cause of the terror-genocide against Other. Be thankful ‘It could be worse.’ we are told "A hundred more could have died instead of two, sixteen, thirty-two or sixty, and we stopped multiple attempts to add to the score.". And the result of such an infamous inept cultural gatekeeper response more names will be added to the list.

"Names of bandits and groups will change, so any treaties or agreements will be meaningless," he said (Mr Rodwell a former Australian soldier who was held captive for almost 15 months by the Abu Sayyaf)
Canadian's beheading not an Islamic State terror act, says former Australian hostage, Lindsay Murdoch, SOUTH-EAST ASIA CORRESPONDENT FOR FAIRFAX MEDIA, April 26, 2016

What are the once determined ‘moderate’ Mosques, Imams leaders altruistic aligners below, and the non-radicalised, ‘moderate’ law abiding ‘many’ who consistently put these altruistic enforcers in such positions, whose dictates are justified and authorised by the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex of which they are all adherents and determine as their true sacred source of ethics-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology enabling to occur in humanities streets? Our inept gatekeepers inaction against such behavior provides the space and even tragically the resources to enable such values systems to be imbued into each new generation.

"The head imam at Lakemba, Sheikh Yahya Safi, had told the congregation during prayers that they should not take part in anything to do with Christmas.

"The fatwa quotes the teacher Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim as saying that congratulating disbelievers for their rituals is forbidden, and if a "Muslim who says this does not become a disbeliever himself, he at least commits a sin as this is the same as congratulating him for his belief in the trinity, which is a greater sin and much more disliked by Almighty Allah than congratulating him for drinking alcohol or killing a soul or committing fornication or adultery”.
No merriness here: mosque puts fatwa on Christmas Sydney Morning Herald, Natalie O'Brien, December 23, 2012
Glasgow mosque leader praises extremist killer By Calum McKay BBC Scotland 25 March 2016
"More names are emerging of some of the hundreds of people killed, injured, or missing following Tuesday's terror attacks in Brussels"
Brussels attacks: Victims and survivors BBC 30 March 2016

Both enable More and More names – names of groups the Islamic/Muslim culture creates and the names of their victims.
 Australians need to understand the reasons for this failure and for the worsening situation by reviewing specific assumptions underlying policy, as well as other factors contributing to inter-cultural schism in Australia, as it is happening overseas.
It is not a matter of demonizing, stigmatizing nor erroneous stereotyping it is a matter of the evidence some cultures inherently inform violence even terror-genocide via their non-radicalised, ‘moderate’ families, communities and institutions cultural indoctrination process systemically creating and sustaining altruistic aligners/enforcers/punishers be they leaders in the hierarchy or other members of the Islamic/Muslim culture, young or old, highly educated or not ,wealthy or poor, to inform terror-genocide and therefore cannot be treated on an equal basis as other cultures in the same space.
The use of force and violence is more commonplace and prevalent in some families, communities, religions, cultural/ethnic groups and societies based on the views and values about adult prerogatives with children espoused. They may also be based upon the sociopathy of the perpetrators." Treatment of Complex Trauma Courtois/Ford 2016
"..children raised in religious households, who are perceived to be more empathetic and sensitive to justice, are in fact less altruistic to their own class mates .... children from religious households also differ in their ratings of deserved punishment for interpersonal harm (F(2, 847) = 5.80, p < 0.01, h2 = 0.014); this was qualified by significantly harsher ratings of punishment by children from Muslim households than children from non-religious households (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between children from Christian households and non-religious households.".
The Negative Association between Religiousness and Children’s Altruism across the World, November 05, 2015

“I came to the absolute conviction that it is impossible…impossible…for any human being to read the biography of Mohammed and believe in it, and then emerge a psychologically and mentally healthy person.”
- Syrian Psychiatrist Dr. Wafa Sultan

 "In fact, I see it as a coming-of-age tale, one where you can see how the ideological divide in Pakistan is fostered and grows in childhood.."
Pakistan's banning spree continues as two documentaries axed for 'negative portrayals'HAMNA ZUBAIR, Images, 1/5/2016 

"Without the ceaseless pulsating heartbeat of our categorization engine, we would understand nothing around us, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action.…..every culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic labels that come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and entities"
SURFACES AND ESSENCES, ANALOGY AS THE FUEL AND FIRE OF THINKING, Douglas Hofstadter (American professor of cognitive science), Emmanuel Sander (French Psychologist-Developmental Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, Educational Psychology), 2013
"Culture, of course, is related to violence in general and not only to structural violence. For example, culture influences the determination of "thresholds" which pressure on a person must overcome in order to move that person from being controllable, or even positive, to being negative (that is, into violence)." The Culture of Violence, Chp 3. On the relationship between violence and culture - Galtung's concept
"The findings of the study indicate that citizens (Hofstede and Hofstede (2005)) of Islamic countries share similar cultural values that vary significantly with those of the Western countries."
Conceptualizing the Islamic Personality Model, Abdul Kadir Othman, Muhammad Iskandar Hamzah, Nurhazirah Hashim, Faculty of Business Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
Culture is not only what people think, it is also what they do. Ideally, cultural explanations would also strive to be mutually non-contradictory ...
Culture, although it cannot ‘do’ anything on its own, provides a framework through which people are motivated to act. Subsequently, incidents of violence are individually and socially understood through narrative, that is, through the stories which are developed by participants, observers and the institutions which deal with them (such as the courts and media). These narratives, in turn, can express motivations or justifications for further violence or, alternatively, for its avoidance or suppression.”
Wood, J. Carter (2007). Conceptualizing cultures of violence and cultural change. In: Carroll, Stuart ed. Cultures of Violence: Interpersonal Violence in Historical Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan.
"Culture uses artefacts, rituals and text to develop and reinforce a shared sense of identity among members. It is the filter through which we see and understand our current reality (Edgar, 1980). .... They also establish boundaries between groups (Oyserman & Lee, 2007)"
Psychology Burton, Western, Kowalski, 2012

"..the program he was involved with aimed to “break the spell of IS”.
Anzac Day terror plot: Teen, 16, failed deradicalisation program
Debra Killalea, APRIL 26, 2016

This one event underlines the failed assumptions which underwrite such programs to prevent 'radicalisation' or de-radicalise for they are programs which are based upon dangerous false assumptions contained within the World Health Organisation (WHO) policy underwriting such programs the main one of which is these adherents of the Islamic/Muslim culture are 'sick' requiring therapy, a good job and a white picket fence that what in reality humanity are confronting is not what in fact it is a cultural war between whole cultures rather than the 'few' these cultures systemically create. 

WHO IS RESPONSIBLE? The World Health Organisation thats WHO.

The assumption at the core of the WHO policy approach is cultures do not inform significantly differing 'rational' models and therefore reasoning-therapy under a Western cultural 'rational' model' and its obvious moral superiority inherent in its fallible human constructs of Freedom of Religion and multiculturalism based upon in major part a Judeo-Christian ethics of "whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also", "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's" and "You shall love your neighbor as yourself." assume every culture's definition and subsequent cultural categorisation engines regards neighbor, innocents, Other, and informed motivational behavior and methodology are in essence the same so 'understanding' can be reached peace and harmony achieved - this is only possible in part with cultures with significantly different ethics-morals-values-beliefs in the same space as such significance of difference informs differing levels of culturally imbued reactionary motivated  behavior, strength of network systems, levels of violence inherent in enforcement internal and acceptance of Other external for the culture to exist and be passed to new generations.

"Every set of beliefs introduces its own logic and its own constraints."
Distinguishing Spiritual from Temporal Power, Inventing the Individual, The origins of Western Liberalism, Larry Siedentop, 2014

“When we describe one of our friends as rational, we often want to imply that they are dispassionate, logical, thoughtful, and in control of their actions.

However, to a decision scientist, “rational” means “consistency with some model.” Rational decisions are not necessarily dispassionate, nor well-reasoned, nor selfish. They aren’t even necessarily good decisions, from others’ perspectives. They simply are consistent.

Rational choice models do not assume anything about what a decision maker prefers; they only state that those preferences consistently lead to choices.

Rational does not mean that a decision was generated by a conscious or logical or reasoned process. Instead, rationality refers to the outcome of decisions."
Behavioral Economics: When Psychology and Economics Collide, S. Huettel, 2014

".imposition of secular western values was reflected in the oath when taking out citizenship, with new citizens required to pledge allegiance to Australia “whose democratic beliefs I share...If you don’t share those values, why should they be forced to sing it?..(the Australian) Government efforts to promote what it bills as a moderate form of Islam might on occasion buy out some Imam but the attempt to reform Islam is doomed to failure.” Mr Badar Hizb ut-Tahrir spokesperson said at a conference held by Islamist activist group Hizb ut-Tahrir entitled “Innocent Until Proven Muslim” is taking place at Bankstown in Sydney’s west, attended by about 800 people."
Islamist group Hizb ut-Tahrir decries ‘forced Muslim assimilation’ THE AUSTRALIAN by Ean Higgins NOVEMBER 01, 2015

“Norms-shared ideas about proper way to behave-are clearer, more firmly held and easier to enforce the more dense a social network. (If a social network consists of n “nodes”. People, firms or other social units, “density” is the proposition of the possible n(n-1)/2 connections among these nodes that are actually present.). This argument is one of the oldest in social psychology; for instance, see the classical account of Festinger, Schachter and Back (1948). It rests on the fact that the denser the network, the more unique paths along which information, ideas about proper behaviour are more likely to be encountered repeatedly, discussed and fixed; it also renders deviance from resulting norms harder and harder to hide and thus, more likely to be punished.” (Granovetter, 2005)

Time for a Royal Commission to determine if the assumption “Not Religion” as the deductive base upon which Australian Security Policy is decided is correct. As clearly this policy is utilised not only in Australia and across the world and is not working terror threats from Muslims are growing not diminishing therefore the policy is not working and must be examined to ascertain why.
Time for a Royal commission to determine the actual current costs and future costs of allowing a culture unrestricted access to the Public Square whose cultural behavioural variance consistently constantly informs terror and major schism. This is so Australian citizens can reflect on the costs and if it is really worth the tragedy and redirection of scarce resources simply to protect ourselves from another culture.
Time for a Royal commission to determine if Freedom of Religion and Multiculturalism are really delivering the peace and harmony its advocates promised. Clearly having infant-child-adolescent-adult ‘radicals’ derived in such numbers, who wish to lop off the heads of Other, indicates Freedom of Religion and Multiculturalism are not delivering and must be reviewed to ascertain why.
Time for a Royal commission to determine if Muslim women dress codes are representative of an oppressive cultural construct inferring upon its wearer responsibility for sexual harassment or worse and subjugation to Mans ‘leadership’ and as such wearing of such Muslim ascribed clothing represents an unacceptable affront to the notions of equality of opportunity and equity of women with man. And also establish if across the Muslim behavioural variance .Muslim women find themselves forced to wear such garments and what that force entails and any possible psychological ramifications of a Muslim female infant-child-adolescence-adult women being conditioned to accept such a cultural construct. Also ascertain if allowing such a construct within the Australian streets may also impact negatively upon non-Muslim females.
Time for a Royal commission to determine given the following is true:
“Culture uses artefacts, rituals and text to develop and reinforce a shared sense of identity among members. It is the filter through which we see and understand our current reality (Edgar, 1980)”
Psychology Burton,Western,Kowalski, 2012
A Royal Commission to determine what Islamic “artefacts, rituals and text to develop and reinforce” within the Muslim behavioural variance determines the notion terror is acceptable, hatred of Other is acceptable, racism against Other is acceptable, and in doing so recommend advise how these Islamic Muslim “artefacts, rituals and text” will be removed from influencing new generations of Muslims to take up terror against Other.
Time for a Royal Commission to examine what has happened in time and space where the Islamic/Muslim culture have been allowed to flourish to develop political power, or be enabled to retake political power and the impact this has had upon the security and relative independence of Other and women and the nature of the societal institutions the Islamic/Muslim politic forms. This data is to be published to inform Public debate and to be utilised by the Royal Commission to provide an impact statement utilising three threat levels none, moderate, and high as to the nature of societal change expected and how given the data these changes and the timing of them would be expected to take place. This is so Australian citizens can decide if the nature of what is in reality informed by the presence of the Islamic/Muslim culture in time and space presents a threat to key beliefs/ethics, definitions which are the foundation stones of existing Australian political institutions.
Australian citizens deserve to know why it has come to this, why Islamic/Muslim terrorism/counter-insurgency policy and implementation have not stopped Muslim violence on Australian streets and the resultant injury death, and what can be done to turn things around for clearly current policy settings have failed and the threat of terror is intensifying. Other the actual victims of Muslims are being blamed for terror emanating from the Muslim community because they point out rightly the terror is emanating from the Muslim culture this is completely unacceptable and the veracity of such claims and the above issues can only be examined to the extent required by a Royal Commission with appropriate powers resources to complete the task.

Time to stop any more names being added to the Islamic/Muslim cultural terror-genocide list.
"More names are emerging of some of the hundreds of people killed, injured, or missing following Tuesday's terror attacks in Brussels"
Brussels attacks: Victims and survivors 7 hours ago
"At least 69 people have been killed and scores injured in an explosion at a public park in the eastern Pakistani city of Lahore, officials say."
Pakistan explosion leaves many dead at Lahore park 1 hour ago 
Time to accept any lull in terror-genocide emanating from the Islamic/Muslim culture, 1, 5, 10, 50, 100 years ..determined as "a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony" until the inevitable occurs is pure delusion. 
“It (Damascus-Syria) has seen empires and tyrants come and go; it offers a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony. It is a wonderful city in which to be. …. a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony"
British Historian Dan Cruickshank BBC series "Cruickshank's Adventures in Architecture, Episode 5 - Connections, Syria, Damascus 2008, First aired on BBC Two in April  2008

Terror-genocide simply develops in both directions.

Lebanon: Christian village hit by multiple suicide attacks BBC, 28/6/2016

What is the reality now in Damascus, in Syria, Lebanon? Should a historian, sociologist, social psychologist not reflect upon the recurring nature of the historic Islamic/Muslim cultural return to violence and even the architecture itself developed and developing overt and covert of separation, of quarters, developing mechanisms to deliver violence and the reactive security systems having to be put in place by Other cultures to 'fortify' against the assaults on their bodies and institutions, representing the utter rejection of Other values utilising strong network systems with "great emphasis placed on Muslims to see themselves as members of a community of true believers .., Muslims to see each other as part of a cohesive social whole .. deliberate individualism is seen as a threat to the order and coherence of society...parents devalue creativity as an important child quality.. intellectual autonomy and imagination ..a stumbling block toward the unconditional surrender required of pious Muslims." (Acevedo, Ellison, & Yilmaz, 2013) limited Islamic/Muslim cultural enabled ability to question the Islamic/Muslim cultural construct of Other cultures enables obedience to the true belief to launch in time again the 'few' the 'true believers' as the Islamic/Muslim culture always have terror-genocide against Other. 

As religiosity 'true-perfect believer' research clearly shows rather than a path to understanding and engaging positively with Other cultures it has a inverse affect yet we continue to after each atrocity take the religious leaders and their fellow adherents words "Nothing to do with me." on face value. Then which culture there has to be one culpable for the systemic terror-genocide we see in our streets?

The perceived need for utilisation of separate space as 'fortification' the British historian Dan Cruickshank clearly saw before him "Muslim quarter, Christian quarter, Jewish quarter, and each of these groups would feel secure in their maze of streets and their gates almost fortified tower entries. A place that would be utterly confusing to unwelcome strangers."  a clear indication of extreme social hostility yet despite his label 'historian' he refused to look below the extremely dangerous multiculturalism assumption in complete contradiction to historical and even current reality "Our differences make us stronger.", current events and history teaches humanity  a truth:

BRUSSELS — There are military trucks parked in Molenbeek, and soldiers with submachine guns patrol the jittery streets of the Brussels district that has been the epicenter of European terrorism ...... Splintered Belgium had lost control of Molenbeek. A heavily Muslim district of Brussels had in effect seceded. If this were the extent of the problem, it would be grave. But Molenbeek is just the most acute manifestation of a European failure."
The Islamic State of Molenbeek, NYT, Roger Cohen APRIL 11, 2016

"A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure, permanently, half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved — I do not expect the house to fall — but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other. Either the opponents of slavery will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction; or its advocates will push it forward, till it shall become lawful in all the States, old as well as new — North as well as South." Lincoln 1858

"Can we cast our votes with their view, and against our own? In view of our moral, social, and political responsibilities, can we do this?

Wrong, as we think slavery is, we can yet afford to let it alone where it is, because that much is due to the necessity arising from its actual presence in the nation; but can we while our votes will prevent it, allow it to spread into the national Territories, and to overrun us here in these free States? If our sense of duty forbids this, then let us stand by our duty fearlessly and effectively. Let us be diverted by none of those sophistical contrivances wherewith we are so industriously plied and belabored – contrivances such as groping for some middle ground between the right and the wrong: vain as the search for a man who should be neither a living man nor a dead man; such as a policy of ‘don’t care’ on a question about which all true men do care." Lincoln 1859

The comments by Lincoln in 1858/59 are reflective of a sociological truth significant values existent within a space where two cultures exist will "not be left alone" which explains why the attacks against Other cultures are occurring and that they will not stop until the political/social space "will become all one thing or all the other". This is the reality face it. Remove the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex or the war continues until the State is no longer "divided". The 'good' you believe your culture represents does not underwrite eventual prevailing of the 'right' ethic of intellectual autonomy and imagination over unquestioning theocratic obedience.

The claim that 'Free Speech' will win over tyranny is a nonsense as we can see with the Arab Spring (Winter) in fact there has never been a 'Free' anything no culture allows such a thing, there is only ever relative autonomy but that is the point such enabling of relative autonomy and imagination for individuals is the first target of tyrannical ideologies for unquestioning obedience to the true-perfect belief is a necessity.

The argument has never been about an attack upon multiculturalism as an aspiration, upon diversity nor upon race this would be ridiculous, for in this globalized world of course many cultures, races need to exist in the same space and most do but tragically some not only do not live harmoniously with Other they cannot due to their cultural codex construct of Other. It is an attack on the assumption which currently is enabling terror-genocide in our streets "Our differences make us stronger." it can but only if the core political and social ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology of cultures are not significantly different otherwise we will be torn apart as we inevitably are now.

"Our differences make us stronger." is an absurd contention under the current multicultural paradigm for there is no disputing the Nazi culture would not make us stronger yet the same Nazi cultural construct of Other is allowed into humanities streets to inform terror-genocide as it must because of the cultural categorisation engine regards Other of the Islamic/Muslim culture is exactly the same.

There is the reverse argument to "Our differences make us stronger." also underlying the idea of multiculturalism "We born in the same way and we all died, It is common things we should have to unite", in other words "What we have in common unites us."

Clearly what we have in common physically in terms of human function, eating, sleeping, disease, movement, etc and destiny life and death have as the evidence before us proves absolutely have no bearing upon the degree of intercultural social hostility.

Indeed why should common things of physical nature unite us, it is the degree human cultures assign value, meaning and belief to the physical/non-physical not the mere fact they exist or are believed to exist? We use the same foot bridge should this unite us? The argument is extremely simplistic. Cows, pigs are mammals they bleed and clearly have emotional responses not unlike humans, we should therefore stop killing them for meat, not a bad idea some will say? Chickens have two eyes so have humans really we should let Chickens go 'free'? It is only the degree our ethics-morals-beliefs-motivation and methodology find commonality in aggregate that determines levels of social hostility, terror-genocide one culture commits against another, not if we are twins, or have a similar digestive systems.   

All entities bear differing levels of threat that has nothing whatsoever to do with what they have in common it inherently pertains to what are their differences, difference in physical capabilities and functions - for instance based on such logic a house cat should really be friends with a tiger.

In human terms the relative level of threat has everything to do with the inherent natures our cultures imbue us with regards Other/out-groups which will be found to be correlated strongly to the relative level of significant difference of ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology our cultures inform regards cultures in the same space - this is what drives inter-cultural violence. 

"What we have in common unites us.", common physicality, common destiny life-death and "Our differences make us stronger." therefore have never been, particularly the later, nor can ever be reasons which stop humans at a cultural level killing Other/out-groups - either significantly different ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology are eliminated or the violence/killing continues. That is if at the ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology level a common aggregated understanding and acceptance is possible and importantly able to be achieved then inter-cultural peace and harmony is possible otherwise no matter how many other physical/nonphysical factors may be exactly the same between differing cultures the cultural war will continue.

To determine otherwise is simply to manage a cultures terror-genocide into your space as we are currently doing with the Islamic/Muslim culture and the reactive forces arising to cancel such a cultural effect out alas utilising in the end the exact same methods as the inept cultural gatekeepers ineffectually watch from the footpath.
It can no longer be a matter of 'educating' citizens as to their responsibilities and behaviours regards each other as individuals in Democracies which necessarily contain many cultures due to our globalized world, as cultures set the behavioral variance within which their adherents exist it is a matter of reviewing what a cultures responsibilities and behaviours regards each other culture in their same space have to be and abide by for any culture to be accepted to and remain in a Democratic multicultural space.
There needs to be a developing political will to combat the apathy being purposefully developed by our current political elite to sweep the increasing hostility index and the bloodied bodies of Other under a justification paradigm of terror-genocide against Other under a label of 'marginalisation' clearly this is not the cause for all cultures subject to varying degrees of 'marginalization' would be informing the same. Clearly shooting police officers, burning peoples in cages, crucifixion, etc are not being generated by Other cultures relative to the Islamic/Muslim culture.
In combination with a move to renegotiate with cultures within a Democratic space what are the requirements demanded of them to remain within that space an approach worth taking along with such negotiations with amended and additional steps as detailed below to establish threat and form the basis for the political momentum/will for the removal of ideological genocide and misogynistic constructs:
"A great deal of foreign policy analysis relies on social and environmental factors, or anecdotal evidence. In seeking to address this problem in a more systematic manner, we move from an investigation centered around state actors to one focused on variation in individual behavior account for the combination of social, cultural, environmental, psychological, and biological differences. Our proposed approach to the study of political violence requires the integration of methods and skills from geneticists and neuroscientists with those in the behavioral and social sciences. Specifically, we seek to introduce an approach to study political violence which : (i) quantifies the effects of genes, environments, and their interaction on behavior; (ii) identifies specific genetic and environmental contexts that lead to such behavior; (iii) develops a comprehensive model of the biological and social pathways to political violence; (iv) identifies populations under specific circumstances which pose a higher or lower prevalence for any specific genes, neurobiological or environmental mechanisms which pose an increased liability for political violence; (v) develops mechanisms to identify individuals within given populations who are most at risk for committing violence, as well as those most resistant to such action; and (vi) creates environmental responses which can mitigate risk among those individuals."
A neurobiological approach to foreign policy analysis: identifying individual differences in political violence PK Hatemi, R McDermott - Foreign Policy Analysis, 2012
Given the necessity of v above and vi above and i-iv informs a systemic cultural propensity to deliver aggression, violence and subjugation of women which is/are deemed intractable my view is vi stands only with the addition of the phrase "..and between the source culture and the Other cultures affected internal and external to the source culture of the individuals and groups informing aggressive behaviors.". With the addition of (vii) where intractable systemic aggression is emanating from a culture creates evidence based proof of such intractability of systemic behavior to frame the political will to remove the cultures capacity to inform aggression from the Public Square. If this means total removal of a cultural codex from the Public Square so be it - is one brutalized life a codex so clearly enables worth such a cultural codex remaining?

"I cannot hide my pain today. A true Muslim was punished for doing which [sic] the collective will of the nation failed to carry out."
Glasgow mosque leader praises extremist killer By Calum McKay BBC Scotland 25 March 2016

"Mr Ali has been recorded saying that over the course of seven years he had identified 240 'radicals Islamists' within his community (Australian) centre, 120 of whom continue to have extremist views and are seen to potentially be on a path to "extreme acts".
Mr Nawaz, who says he understands extreme Islamist groups because he was once a true believer, thinks Mr Ali's admission is a serious concern."
Eradicating radical Islam July 3, 2013, 6:18 pm James Thomas Today Tonight

"It is very clear what I mean, which is that there is a violent, radical, fanatical, nihilistic interpretation of Islam by a faction … within the Muslim community that is our enemy, and that has to be defeated."
Obama: To Stop Terrorism Islam Must Reconcile Itself To Modernity April 4, 2016 by Michael Stone

"It is very clear" the Islamic/Muslim 'True-Perfect believer' the purveyor of words and action against Other cultures are the holders of Islamic/Muslim codex 'True-Perfect belief' a "violent, radical, fanatical, nihilistic interpretation of Islam" which not only the leaders of the Islamic/Muslim culture determine as reflects Islamic/Muslim codex 'True-Perfect belief' but fellow adherents 'once' 'True-Perfect believers' themselves. It is critical to understand an Islamic/Muslim 'extremist' exists only under a Western cultural 'rational' model not under a the Islamic/Muslim cultural 'rational' model.

No culture has a right to visit terror-genocide against another culture in the same space - be it perpetrated by the 'few' sourced from the 'many' or the 'few' in time as elsewhere becoming the 'many'.

Obama is not the only one who requires research to demonstrate Islam "is "fundamentally compatible" with the values of Western culture.

"The French Prime Minister Manuel Valls said he wanted "to be able to demonstrate that Islam" was "fundamentally compatible" with the values of the French Republic, "certain people don’t want to believe" that Islam can fit into French society and that "a majority of French citizens doubt it, but I’m convinced that it’s possible."
French prime minister wants to ban Islamic headscarves in universities, WP, 
By Ishaan Tharoor, April 13, 2016

"Migrants arriving in Germany will be required to learn the language under a new integration law proposed by the ruling coalition.
They could also be told where to live..
In an attempt to prevent migrant ghettos, anyone who moves away from where they have officially been resettled could be penalised

Any migrants who fail to take up the offer of help could lose benefits and residence permits

Counter-terrorism measures would allow police to deploy undercover agents and allow intelligence agencies to work more closely with their European, Nato and Israeli counterparts" 
Germany moves towards new integration law for migrants BBC15/4/2016

The tragedy of German's actions are they are based upon the real threat posed by the Islamic/Muslim culture no other culture since World War II has or more importantly had to be subject to such restriction of movement and attempted forced acceptance of the cultural norms of the country to which they have forced their way across its borders. It is a tragedy because as time passes all attempts to 'assimilate' the Islamic/Muslim culture in such a way that they will accept Other cultures as elsewhere will fail as it has in Australia, Britain, France, Belgium,.. as for goodness sake Islamic/Muslim cultures acceptance of Other cultures in their own dominated spaces clearly proves. 

The Damascustization of Europe has been in progress for some time and will not be halted by such legislation as cultures will adapt, improvise overcome to realise their worldview not Others. How explicit, how many more bloody bodies in our streets will it require for the intellectual/political elite to determine we are in a cultural war and not dealing with generic criminal violence.

"He called on the attendants to pledge 'before Allah to restore the Caliphate, to raise the banner, to restore the Sharia, to unite the Islamic nation and to lead the armies of jihad that will conquer Europe and America so that the word of Allah will reign supreme'.
'Start dealing with them, before they start dealing with you. Cut of their hands before they sow corruption on the land. You in Turkey are able to do that, Allah willing.'
Al-Wahwah is the leader of Australia's hardline Muslim group Hizb ut-Tahrir.said to reject democracy, secularism and all Western models of state"
'They are all enemies, their hearts are black': Australian Islamic extremist delivers hate speech calling for 'armies of jihad' to conquer Europe and America so 'the word of Allah will reign supreme' Daily Mail, By RACHEL EDDIE FOR DAILY MAIL AUSTRALIA PUBLISHED: 14 April 2016

This is 14 April 2016 not some time in the seventh century. Does anyone seriously believe the Australian culture or any Other culture have been purposefully excluded from being left out of the Australian Islamic leaders list for conquest  ('the act of taking control of a country, city, etc., through the use of force) yet we do not act forcefully against the culture which systemically create these Islamic leaders not only encouraging the destruction of Other cultures but as we see by doing so legitimising the actions of those that do? 

The claim by Clive Williams ANU so called expert on terror commenting on Belgium claimed on ABC radio 15/4/2016 the Muslim prison population of Belgium was 80% and the Belgian Muslim population was only 5% one has to wonder if the 80% is actually true, but even if it was to then assume the number is indicative of the Belgian society 'marginalising' the Islamic/Muslim culture and this is why Muslim terror exists  begs the question if the reality is as research, inclusive of the a survey recently carried out in Britain and the comments of Islamic leaders and adherents of rejection of  "democracy, secularism and all Western models of state", have actually proven time and again, where mere reading of the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex would confirm it, the Islamic/Muslim cultures ethics-morals-values-beliefs are so significantly different than the Western cultural space the Islamic/Muslim culture resides within, could it be the reverse Islamic/Muslim cultures rejection of Other cultures and refusal to fully participate within Belgian society under Belgian societal norms? 

Other cultures have been subject to such 'marginalisation' or even a worse form do not inform terror-genocide against Other cultures logic would therefore dictate the proportion of Belgian Muslims in jails and the terror-genocide emanating from the Islamic/Muslim culture has little or nothing to do with 'marginalisation' by Belgium. One just has to reflect on the nature of Other cultures political/social condition where the Islamic/Muslim culture is dominant to know with relative certainty economic 'marginalisation' is not and has never been the cause of Islamic/Muslim cultural terror against Other cultures.

The Religion of Peace: Opinion Polls

Other destined for terror-genocide can and does include Muslims themselves as the Islamic/Muslim codex categorisation of Other includes Muslims not measuring up to a ‘true-perfect believer’ Islamic/Muslim status, "overt crusaders" and "politically active apostates" .

Just because the Islamic/Muslim ‘rational’ value system leaves both Muslims and Other cultures dead in the streets should this equality determine as some are demanding we must be empathetic to the Islamic/Muslim culture because their very own cultural codex construct of Other determines not only their demise but Others as well? Is this really a rational demand to make of any culture to accept a culture within because the cultures codex not only informs the killing of members of your culture but of their own members as well? 

Cultural psychology determines within a dominant cultural space there will exist within minority cultures adherents professing and possibly even believing they possess values-beliefs aligned to the dominant culture but this does not stop in time and space the 'true-perfect believer'  behavior construct of Other and the justified and authorised methodology of terror-genocide from being increasingly manifest as the political/social resources enable the culture to reflect more and more its worldview. 

The same so called 'moderate' adherents of such a culture with terror-genocide inherent as a method of dealing with Other cultures, actually enable the culture to be protected whilst at the very same time the culture delivers terror-genocide against the very citizens these so called 'moderates'  determine as having values-beliefs they espouse as their own which clearly if someone had another look at the bloody bodies in the streets alongside the cultural codex construct of Other would know with certainty such a view is dangerous delusion. 

Dangerous delusion on the part of the 'moderate' adherents themselves and those who believe what they are saying to be true for the bloody bodies would not exist if the 'moderates' did not for the 'few' delivering the terror-genocide are coming consistently systemically from the 'moderate' ranks. It is the same logic as determining a murderer clearly seen to cut off a person's head with a sword is innocent because the sword caused the head to be severed, not the ethics-morals-beliefs-motivation of the person who swung the sword - currently there is a denial cultural method Al-Qaeda, IS, Hezbollah, perceived individual acts,...are actually connected to a cultural codex cause which research determines as impossible. 

The 'moderates' exist within the exact same cultural behavoral variance which enables the whole of the Islamic/Muslim culture to move from one generation to the next and must therefore be held culpable for what their culture informs for as previously stated without them there would be no terror-genocide against Other for there would be no way the 'few' could come into existence and be sustained to systemically deliver terror-genocide against Other cultures.

Muslims will always be the victims along with Other cultures but also be the perpetrators of their own demise as well as Other cultures adherents - this is the insanity we allow into our Western societal space at our peril. 

"The Islamic State of Isis and Syria (ISIS) has released a "kill list" in its terror magazine, Dabiq, in which a number of prominent Western Muslims have been named.......
The Muslims on the list are being considered as "overt crusaders" and "politically active apostates" because they have integrated their life in politics, enforcing laws of the disbelievers."
ISIS publishes new 'kill list' targeting Hillary Clinton aide, along with other Muslim politicians Christian Deguit17 April, 2016

ISIS vows to assassinate 21 Muslim clerics April 16, 2016

"“One must either take the journey to dār al-Islām, joining the ranks of the mujāhidīn therein, or wage jihād by himself with the resources available to him (knives, guns, explosives, etc.) to kill the cru­saders and other disbelievers and apostates, including the imāms of kufr, to make an example of them, as all of them are valid – rather, obligatory – targets ac­cording to the Sharī’ah, except for those who openly repent from kufr before they are apprehended.” issue (number 14) of the Islamic State’s propaganda magazine, Dabiq, published April 13

The list shows the extent of the Islamic State’s adherence to the doctrine of takfir, which enables them to brand any Muslim who does not submit to their authority and hold by their interpretation of Islam a heretic worthy of death."
EXCLUSIVE: ISIS Has Hit List of Western Muslim Leaders Clarion Project, April 13, 2016

The question you need to ask is where did these IS participants come from, from which cultural codex framed families, communities, institutions if there are no IS participants coming from families, communities, institutions claiming to be 'liberal-moderate' then you can determine the argument above falsely based and ignore it otherwise to stop the terror-genocide you are going to have to hold the 'moderates' along with the so called extremists equally culpable for the bloody bodies in our streets. 

Why should the Muslim leaders, "overt crusaders" and "politically active apostates", targeted by IS be regarded with the same derision and condemned as Islamic State adherents, it is because the very cultural codex the targeted 'moderate' imams utilise as their sacred codex for their ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation methodology is the exact same sacred codex Islamic State adherents use for their own and the Islamic/Muslim knowledge contained within the Islamic/Muslim codex to justify and authorise the ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation methodology enables the Islamic State imams to win the argument as to what is a Islamic/Muslim 'True-Perfect believer'.

“If the religious leaders compete with the extremists (religious leaders) on Islamic knowledge, I cannot guarantee that they would win. That’s what worries me,” said Adudulkrep, who is also head of the state-run Xinjiang Islamic Institute...."

Therefore to be empathetic with 'moderate' Islamic/Muslim leaders is the exact same rationale as being empathetic with Nazi leaders, such as the Military leaders in the German army in 1939 in Poland, who expressed opposition to the methods of the Nazi SS yet whose cultural codex they had sworn adherence to, contained clearly within Hitler's Mein Kampf the exact same construct of Other contained in Muhammad's Quran, was justifiably and authoritatively underwriting the Nazi SS terror-genocide actions in Poland as elsewhere against Other cultures so logically the German Military leaders as well as other Nazis supporting their moral position had no Nazi codex support sufficient to overrule the so called Nazi SS extremists. So what happened in Nazi Germany in 1939 and afterwards in Germany and elsewhere is exactly what happened in Birmingham 2014 and afterwards in Britain and elsewhere.

 "• Parents do not have the confidence to argue against the articulate and forceful activists who seek to impose their views, for fear of being branded as disloyal to their faith or their community."
Schools face new curbs on extremism after Birmingham Trojan horse affair Patrick Wintour, Political editor The Guardian, Wednesday 23 July 2014

Even attempts to form a 'moderate' version consensus as to the 'true' Islam as an ideology of "values of compassion, mutual respect, tolerance, acceptance and freedom of religion.". in Jordan in 2004 had Islamic State morph from the 'defeated' Al Qaida on Jordan's very doorstep and elsewhere to determine such a version of Islam not the only one to be able to be justifiably and authoritatively analogised from the Islamic/Muslim codex in complete mocking contradiction of the Jordan declaration. And clearly from surveys of Muslims around the world the Islamic State is not alone regards its beliefs as to the nature of the 'true-perfect believer' the Islamic/Muslim codex templates.

".. political initiatives to construct credible and legitimate alternatives for the world's Muslim population instead of the current limited choice between the support for Al Qaida (now superseded by a new name Islamic State) or "collaboration" with the West. In this context, the Ammam Message initiative of King Abdullah II of Jordan is an extremely important step, bringing together religious and political leaders from across the Islamic world to condemn AQ's heretical takfiri ideology. .. they are much more powerful and credible than Western initiatives.."
'The Accidental Guerrilla' - David Kilcullen, 2009:

"The Amman Message was delivered in Amman, Jordan, (2004) as a Ramadan sermon by Chief Justice Sheikh Iz-al-Din al-Tamimi in the presence of King Abdullah II and a number of Muslim scholars. According to a report issued by the International Crisis Group, "The sermon stressed the need to re-emphasise Islam's core values of compassion, mutual respect, tolerance, acceptance and freedom of religion." The next year, in July 2005, an Islamic convention brought together 200 Muslim scholars from over 50 countries who issued a three-point declaration (later known as 'Three Points of the Amman Message'). This declaration focused on:" Amman Message 
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did the Jordan declaration stop the terror-genocide against Other? No it did not as clearly if anyone picks up the Quran let alone any other Islamic text derived from it to determine if these Islamic/Muslim codex inform freedom of religion will find such a claim is a blatant lie as innocents are circumscribed from the very first pages of the Islamic/Muslim codex to determine such a construct under Islam an impossibility and the Islamic State and many names before and to come as inevitable given the Islamic/Muslim categorisation of a 'True-Perfect Believer'.

"Enough is enough. It is time to speak out. 

“Islam is innocent” is an incomplete sentence. Introspection is needed, for, if we shy away from reality, the alternative will be more images like those we witnessed last Tuesday night, when brave Lt. Muath Al Kasasbeh was burnt to death in a cage. 

The inconvenient truth that is overlooked or willfully ignored by apologists for the indefensible is the fact that Wahabism, the cult of mediaeval austerity founded by Ibn Abdul Wahab (1703-1792), has over the last half century been exported to every mosque and school throughout the Muslim world until it completely enveloped mainstream Sunni Islamic teachings. 

Wahabism has entirely replaced, and become, Sunni Islam; the two cannot be told apart anymore. Some Wahabist teachings, which have permeated the air we breathe in the Muslim world, are simply irreconcilable with decent human values, especially the ones that declare that every non-Wahabist is a disposable body whose bloodletting is unproblematic."
‘We have a problem’ by Zaid Nabulsi The Jordan Times Feb 10, 2015

The writer Zaid Nabulsi Jordanian attorney and partner in the law firm of Nabulsi & Associates has a further problem, as does humanity as a result, from where was the Wahhabi cultural codex analogy derived from for it is only either true transcription or an inference/analogy capable of being validly formed from the very 'text' Zaid Nabulsi claims by true transcription or an inference/analogy capable of informing good rather than evil - this is impossible for if one informs evil so does the other.

The reality as to the veracity of the claim of Islamic/Muslim cultural tolerance plays out on the Kingdom of Jordan's very doorstep in Syria and Iraq, as well as elsewhere across the world, as this very Amman Message is made, with subsequently one of Jordan's very own air force pilots experiencing the Islamic/Muslim codex derived version of tolerance inherent in the message of the Islamic/Muslim Almighty to His prophet Muhammad.

Again 'denouncing' from one part of the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex derived behavioral variance:

Religious, political leaders denounce terrorism at Kazakhstan conference, By James Russo, May 31, 2016

Did it make any difference?

"Authorities have estimated that between 200 and 400 citizens of Kazakhstan have left the country, along with their wives and children, to take up arms alongside groups like Islamic State in Iraq and Syria."
Kazakhstan: At Least 10 Killed in Unrest Blamed on Extremists, June 5, 2016

If not why does humanity persist in a failed policy of accepting such denouncements as a true reflection of a culture's codex when Islamic/Muslim cultural derived terror-genocide continues despite such calls from some leaders of the faith clearly unable to override opposite calls from leaders within the exact same cultural behavioral variance? Clearly humanity are dealing with the symptoms of the Islamic/Muslim culture and not the actual problem the Islamic/Muslim culture itself the actual cause. 

We are dealing differing 'rational' cultural models what appears to be insane behavior from Others perspective, and diminishingly along the liberal-moderate end of the same Muslim culture delivering the terror reflecting Others own ethics not their own as determined by Islamic codex, is sane behavior based upon the Muslim cultural 'rational' model.

Just one child worth having such a cultural construct with in the Public Square – any Public Square?

"Republican Representative Ted Poe of Texas said at Tuesday’s hearing that Saudi Arabia spends billions of dollars exporting Wahhabism, a fundamentalist interpretation of Islam, and Republican Representative Dana Rohrabacher of California said “the Saudis and the Saudi royal family are right up to their eyeballs" in terrorist activity."
Saudi Culture Exports Extremism, Former 9/11 Commissioner Says, Nafeesa Syeed, Bloomberg, May 25, 2016

I have explained why as the analysis is showing the social hostility index will rise as the Islamic/Muslim culture gains increasing political/social resource power as it has wherever it has been enabled to flourish, and why it is not possible to simply take the affable Islamic/Muslim individual/group espousing alignment to your ethics-beliefs and assume all is right with the world for what is happening in the rest of the Islamic/Muslim behavoral variance, or that this affability will remain as it is as the 'few' altruistic aligners/enforcers/punishers increase their influence based upon the Islamic/Muslim 'true-perfect' believer exemplar. 

Humanity has decided to utilise any number of cultural templates to enable them to maximise their security and access to resources to enable them to create new generations, humanity can also decide if such cultural templates inherently inform a mortal threat to their existence and move decisively to remove the cultural codex which informs such a threat from private and public spheres so in time and space this threat no longer exists. No cultural template as history clearly proves and commonsense dictates has an inalienable right to exist.

Tyranny in whatever form be it secular or religious must never under whatever human constructed paradigm i.e. freedom of religion, etc enable such tyrannies continuance simply for the sake of sticking to a once beneficial paradigm, only found to be beneficial within a specific context.

My view is there is a fatal assumption inherent in Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (‘UDHR”) and it is this.

The Mufti mealy-mouthed response:
  “There are no words to truly describe the devastation of these acts but we will continue in solidarity and pray for peace.” ...
“causative factors” of terrorism, including “racism, Islamophobia, curtailing freedoms through securitisation, duplicitous foreign policies and military intervention”.. Dr Ibrahim Abu Mohamed
Grand mufti sues News Corp's Daily Telegraph for defamation, Michael Safi,The Guardian Saturday 23 April 2016 06.00 AEST

The daily telegraph is justifiable in claiming the Mufti's and in fact  non-radicalised, 'moderate', law abiding Muslims determination: 
1. To See No Muslim cultural culpability for Islamic/Muslim cultural derived terror-genocide 
2. To Hear No Muslim cultural culpability for Islamic/Muslim cultural derived terror-genocide 
3. And worse To refuse to speak of Muslim cultural culpability for Islamic/Muslim cultural derived terror-genocide 

Muslims inclusive of Dr Ibrahim Abu Mohamed instead blame everything else expect the true cause the Islamic/Muslim development process infant-child-adolescent-adult which utlises a cultural codex (text and exemplar (messianic) template),  which contains a clear terror-genocide codex construct of Other, to systemically create, sustain and imbue the 'few' altruistic enforcers from their all so non-radicalised, 'moderate',  law abiding ranks with "violent, radical, fanatical, nihilistic" natures to deliver a Islamic/Muslim culture derived terror-genocide into humanities streets and according to Obama such Islamic/Muslim terror-genocide against Other will not cease until  the Islamic/Muslim culture 'reforms'  to a point to where the Islamic/Muslim culture 'reconciles itself with modernity'.

"Obama has argued that there will be no comprehensive solution to Islamist terrorism until Islam reconciles itself to modernity and undergoes some of the reforms that have changed Christianity"
Obama: To Stop Terrorism Islam Must Reconcile Itself To Modernity April 4, 2016 by Michael Stone

"It is very clear what I mean, which is that there is a violent, radical, fanatical, nihilistic interpretation of Islam by a faction … within the Muslim community that is our enemy, and that has to be defeated."
Obama: To Stop Terrorism Islam Must Reconcile Itself To Modernity April 4, 2016 by Michael Stone

The fact is the Muslims inclusive of Dr Ibrahim Abu Mohamed will not accept commonsense observation of the Muslim behavioral variance that the Islamic/Muslim development process infant-child-adolescent-adult informs significantly negative altruistic behavior as a human becomes more religious, closer to the true-believer status under the tutelage of the knowledge contained within the Islamic/Muslim religious codex.

"..children raised in religious households, who are perceived to be more empathetic and sensitive to justice, are in fact less altruistic to their own class mates .... children from religious households also differ in their ratings of deserved punishment for interpersonal harm (F(2, 847) = 5.80, p < 0.01, h2 = 0.014); this was qualified by significantly harsher ratings of punishment by children from Muslim households than children from non-religious households (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between children from Christian households and non-religious households.".
The Negative Association between Religiousness and Children’s Altruism across the World, November 05, 2015

The insufficient contradictory apology after each Islamic/Muslim cultural attack of 'Sorry it happened but they are not Muslims' where clearly they are Muslims from the very same apologetic non-radicalised, 'moderate', law abiding Muslim families, communities and institutions from which these Muslim terrorists walk, an insipid 'mealy-mouthed response' along with the obligatory BBQ with increasingly tattered 'I Love Other' t-shirts should no longer be accepted, as an effective apology requires at its core acceptance of responsibility as simply saying 'I am sorry.' “mourn[ed] the loss of innocent lives” and conveyed his “deepest condolences to the families and friends of the deceased” Dr Ibrahim Abu Mohamed is cheap talk, and significantly integral to any effective apology is a promise to repair the damage and importantly a professed determination not to repeat the offending behavior are , completely lacking in Dr Ibrahim Abu Mohamed's 'mealy-mouthed response'.

Dr Ibrahim Abu Mohamed as the Daily Telegraph rightly determines regards the  2015 November 2015 Paris attacks fails to accept what is clearly required in his (Islamic/Muslim cultures) apology, an acceptance of Islamic/Muslim cultural responsibility, as these are Muslim altruistic enforcers delivering terror-genocide are derived from so called Islamic/Muslim non radicalised, 'moderate', law abiding families, communities and institutions,  nor does Dr Ibrahim Abu Mohamed detail as the Islamic/Muslim representative how the Muslim culture are going to move effectively to stop any repetition, instead blaming Other cultures for Dr Ibrahim Abu Mohamed's own Islamic/Muslim cultures behavoral variance outcomes.

Leaving the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex construct of Other in place and simply to continue to invest vast resources and promises to deal with the symptoms the 'few' who systemically come straight from the 'ranks' of the 'many' and will increasingly do so as history clearly proves is not an 'offer of repair' in fact it is a continuing denial of culpability.

7 Elements of an Effective Apology - 6 to be found in Lewicki et al  research.  
       1. Expression of regret
       2. Explanation of what went wrong
       3. Acknowledgment of responsibility
       4. Declaration of repentance
       5. Offer of repair
       6. Promise not to reoffend
       7. Request for forgiveness

What happens when either an effective apology is not forthcoming or it is an insipid 'mealy-mouthed response' of a denial of culpability despite clear evidence to the contrary, and as well in a cultural war the cultural gatekeepers of the culture being attacked actually defend the responsive behavior of the attacking culture? I do not want the future for my grandchildren's children such a continued paradigm of denial on the part of not only the attacking culture and that of the attacked cultures cultural gatekeepers will inevitably bring, with the first vestiges of the result bloody in our streets, with worse to come as we are told and inevitable as the Islamic/Muslim categorisation engine regards Other has not been deleted from humanities private and public spheres.

Islamic Terrorism Is A Form Of Islam And We Can't Deny It, Says Salman Rushdie, HuffPost Staff, 29/05/2016

Acevedo, G. A., Ellison, C. G., & Yilmaz, M. (2013). Religion and child-rearing values in Turkey. Journal of Family Issues, 0192513X13504921. 

Popular posts from this blog

Franz Kafka has been relegated to the ordinary. Islam Islamist Dichotomy Paradigm "the paradigms tells us what is real and how it works, to question the paradigm is to question the structure of the world itself"

Saudi crown prince promises 'return to moderate Islam'=Reich Minister of Propaganda of Nazi Germany promises 'return to moderate Nazism'. The Terror-Genocide Continues. A Muslim cultures dissimulating soft power in full swing despite the obvious contradiction.

A proof the Islam Islamist Dichotomy Paradigm, Islam/Not Islam-strain of extremism, Underwriting the legitimacy of National Security Policy is a dangerous lie-is it not time to be honest, Lakemba Muslims are as much a threat to humanity as Muslims have been everywhere else in time and space