Please Explain: Nazi (Hitler-Mein Kampf) & Muslim (Mohammed-Quran) Cultural Codex Construct of Other. Why is it One Is and One Is-Not When both = "I don't mean participated, I mean observed."?
 |
| Explain Why one Is and the other Is-Not. |
"Many of the fighters claimed to have been just cooks or clerks."
ISIS (Muslim) Fighters, Having Pledged to Fight or Die, Surrender en Masse, NYT, ROD NORDLAND, OCT. 8, 2017
"I don't mean participated, I mean observed."
Oskar Groening trial: Nazi bookkeeper of Auschwitz admits 'moral guilt' in German court, SMH, Michelle Martin, APRIL 22 2015
The exact same cultural terror-genocide codex constructs of Other, the same burnt, crucified, gassed, shot, blown to bits, sliced, pillaged, raped, tortured, incarcerated, politically/socially ostracised subjugated.. bloody broken bodies and lives of Other and yet you claim you can determine 'good', 'moderate', peaceful and law abiding' Muslim families exist where 'good', 'moderate', 'peaceful and law abiding' Nazi families do not. Look at your hands what do you see, are they as clean as the logic and evidence you utilise to convince yourself you are not in any way culpable for the carnage continuing before you?
Berlin terror cell nabbed after arrests in Italy and Germany, DW, 28/4/2017
London terror alert: How serious is it?, BBC, Dominic Casciani, 28 April 2017
Turkish terrorism watch list includes more than 400 suspected Australian jihadists, ABC, 29/4/2017
The once peaceful and law abiding 'few' becoming the many as the 'few' have always been the many.
"The vote was fairly clear among the nearly 3 million Turkish passport holders living across Europe. After half of the ballots in Germany were counted, more than 63 percent voted “Yes,” ...
Support from Turks in Austria was even greater, at 72.3 percent, after about one fifth of votes were counted.......
Several European leaders have criticized Mr. Erdogan for cleansing the administration and intimidating the opposition. Since February German journalist Deniz Yücel has been detained for allegedly collaborating with anti-government forces."
Erdogan Wins More Power, Handlesblatt Global, John Blau John Blau 17. April 2017
"She added that "his trial focused heavily on Quranic law and little on any mitigating mental illness. As a result, Al-Shamri has been sentenced to death for being an atheist.""
Saudi Arabia will execute 'atheist for insulting the prophet' Ahmad Al-Shamri renounced Islam and uploaded his views on social media. The religious police soon visited. By Romil Patel, April 28, 2017
Freedom to choose- the terrorists are-become the manys cultural derived institutions enforcing the manys ethics-values-beliefs methodology.
“..terrorists typically are no more religiously devout than are non-terrorists (Atran, 2003), using religion to sanctify terrorism should be useful for generating additional motivational force to impel individual acts of terrorism as well as to sustain collective will for long campaigns of terrorism (Atran, 2003; Juergensmeyer, 2003).
Indeed, means end analysis of terrorism (Kruglanski & Fishman, 2006) implies a role for cultural (including religious) factors that influence many facets of self-regulation, including (a) the goals people select, (b) the motivational force that becomes attached to those goals, (c) error monitoring, (d) self-regulatory strength, and (e) the outputs at people’s disposal for modifying their behavior to maintain progress toward goal attainment. In other words, a self-regulation analysis of religion suggests that religion is well suited to motivate any behavior that is predicated on self-control and self-regulation, whether that behavior is studying hard for final exams or donning an explosives belt and then detonating it on a crowded city bus.”
Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: Associations, explanations, and implications.
Michael E. McCullough and Brian L. B. Willoughby - Psychological bulletin, 2009
“We need to ask ourselves if our religious institutions are producing faithful believers or the flag-bearers for different sects. We need to ask if the country is being united or divided in the name of religion,” the PM said.
...“Religious scholars in the past disagreed with each other, but they never incited hatred in their followers’ hearts regarding other sects,” Sharif added."
Pakistan PM seeks help from clerics in war against militants, Daka Tribune, March 12, 2017
"He told those in attendance that “terrorism had no links to religion but was groups created over the years came from several parts of the world with one goal in mind”.
Former Saudi justice minister tells EU parliament: Terrorism has no religion, AL ARABIYA, 13 March 2017
Both quotes above by Muslim leaders cannot be true at the same time, the numbers-groups and the fact they originate from 'several parts of the world' not only currently, when violent jihad against Other operated as a Muslim conversion-elimination method since the 7th century, statistically determines religion, the Islamic religious Quran codex construct of Other and how relations between Muslims and Other are to be managed, clearly determines these Muslim religious defined precepts have, are and will with Muslim family, community, institutions infant-child-adolescent-adult development process, result in Muslim terror, not as an unsubstantiated Islamic clerical or otherwise interpretation of the Quran but as its true reflection of the Muslim precepts contained in the Quran and its exemplars behavior.
“They severed his fingers and later beheaded and dismembered him, according to details from audio recordings”
Audio Offers Gruesome Details of Jamal Khashoggi Killing, Turkish Official Says, NYT, By Carlotta Gall and David D. Kirkpatrick, Oct. 17, 2018
Quran: Surah 8 Al-Anfal - The Spoils of War
12 "Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): 'I am with you: give firmness to the believers: I will instil terror into the hearts of the unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their fingertips off them. '
It is the fact these interpretations are able to exist at all justifying and authorising such Muslim terrorist behavior on such a scale from the very beginning of Muslims existence in the 7th century, with only lulls due to political/social impediments in particular spaces preventing the enforcement of Muhammad's words to the letter, until required economic-political-social thresholds had been reached determines Muslims do as a culture inherently inform terror not peace, even within their own culture, due to the very nature of the construct of Other laid down by Mohammed where each in their turn even Muslims themselves will be not may be subject to Muslim terror.
“Jihad defined
Webster defines jihad as “a holy war waged on behalf is learn as a religious duty”, and “crusade for a principle or belief” (Mirriam–Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 11th ed.).
What does the sharia, this great body of law, teach about jihad? A few Muslim scholars insist that Jihad only refers to the internal struggle of the soul and has no reference to military action against an external enemy or another religion. A few passages in the Koran might perhaps be interpreted in this manner, but definitely not all of them. The occasional reference to the “struggle in his way” might conceivably be understood as a moral struggle, although the context is dubious at best. The same Sura ads, “whether unarmed or well-equipped, march on and fight for the cause of Allah, with your wealth and with your persons,” and finally, “Prophet, make war on the unbelievers and the hypocrites.” This takes Jihad out of the realm of mere internal struggle.
Let those who would exchange the life of this world for the hereafter,
fight for the cause of Allah; whoever fights for the cause of God, whether
they die or conquer, We shall richly reward them… The true believers
fight for the cause of God, but the infidels fight for idols.
At one point it seems that Mohammed declares war on Jews and Christians unless they embraced is land. “Fight against such of those to whom the scriptures were given as believe neither in Allah nor the Last day… [who] do not embrace the true faith until they pay tribute out of hand and are utterly subdued.” That can hardly be taken to refer to an internal struggle! The call to kill adulterers is crystal-clear: “when the sacred months [four months out of the year] are over slay the adulterers where ever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them. If they repent, and take to prayer and pay the arms tax, let them to go their way. God is forgiving and merciful.”
Fighting encouraged
In the Koran, vigorous warfare is encouraged: “when you meet the unbelievers in the battlefield strike off their heads, and when you have laid them low, find your captors firmly. Then grant them their freedom or take ransom from the period” the Koran explicitly states that a different rule prevails for fellow Muslims. “He that kills a believer by design, shall burn in hell forever.” Those who embrace is land and then deserted are to be seized “and put them to death where ever you find them.” An apostate can be killed outright. War is lawful against infidels and apostates, and these wars count as Jihad.”The Popular Encyclopaedia of World Religions, Richard Wolff, 2007
"The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter."
What Does Islam Teach About Violence, The Religion of Peace, 2017
The existence of contrary text, as the Quran itself dictates does not negate the other each edict of behavior-action stands and is therefore able to be utilised as justification and authorisation of Muslim behavior be it peaceful or violent, it is therefore erroneous to claim Islam-Muslims ideology informs peace simply because a few pieces of text so called peaceful text exists in an ocean of violent justification-authorisation against Other and any adherent acting otherwise is misinterpreting Islamic codex is a lie.
Even supposed contrary text utilised to determine Muslims as peaceful is the Verse (ayah) 256 of Al-Baqara
254… Those who reject faith – they are the wrongdoers.
256 “Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error whoever rejects Evil and beliefs in Allah hath grasped the most trustworthy handheld, that never breaks. And Allah heareth and knoweth all things.”
257… Of those who reject faith the patrons are the Evil ones: from light they will lead them forth into the depths of darkness. They will be companions of fire, to dwell therein (forever).
Firstly "no compulsion" is simply a reiteration of a previously stated fact it is God who determines if an individual is predestined to be saved or condemned attempting to compel Other to convert is therefore a wasted effort. Such a statement in no way protects Other from violence for if they reject Islam this is a trigger for their demise predicated upon the violent text within the Quran. Silence is not even a protection as the Quran determines it is a useless exercise Other wouldn't understand anyway. Secondly look at what construct of Other is in the exact same section 34 of the Al-Baqara Quran text surrounding verse 256 determining rejectors of the Islamic faith as deviants involved in wrongdoing, and worse 'Evil'. What do cultures do to those they determines as wrongdoers and evil? The Islamic-Muslim culture sets out clearly what happens and it is not benign.
"I argued that Muslims must uphold freedom of conscience, in line with the Quranic dictum “No compulsion in religion.”" writes Mustafa Akyol.
A Proposal for Islam, NYT, Mustafa Akyol, 28-9-2017
As with the interlinking construct of 'innocents' in the Quran, the source of Muslim ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation social/political method, "No compulsion” is already qualified-circumscribed before the statement "No compulsion" is even reached.
002.006 As to those who reject Faith, it is the same to them whether thou warn them or do not warn them; they will not believe.
002.007 God hath set a seal on their hearts and on their hearing, and on their eyes is a veil; great is the penalty they (incur).
002:018 They are utterly deaf, dumb, and blind; they can no longer recover.
"No compulsion" is in fact simply a restatement of an already Allah Quran stipulated set of statements, Allah-God is the one who decides who will believe or not believe –“God hath set a seal on their hearts and on their hearing, and on their eyes is a veil.” Which is a stipulation repeated in the verse following immediately after the verse determining ‘No Compulsion’ –
“.002.257 Allah (is the) Protecting Guardian (of) those who believe[d]. He brings them out from [the] darkness towards [the] light”.
002.256 Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error: whoever rejects evil and believes in God hath grasped the most trustworthy hand- hold, that never breaks. And God heareth and knowethall things.
002.257 Allah (is the) Protecting Guardian (of) those who believe[d]. He brings them out from [the] darkness towards [the] light. And those who disbelieve(d) their guardians (are) the evil ones, they bring them out from the light towards [the] darkness. Those (are the) companions (of) the Fire, they in it will abide forever.
The Quran therefore determines it is impossible to compel even if you wanted to, you cannot force-convert another person to believe be it you utilise non-violent methods or otherwise Allah God decides. “Let there be no compulsion in religion” is simply restating the obvious. So it has no meaning no inherent protection for Other and cannot be utilised in an argument to determine it does for what surrounds it?
The trouble is what exists in verses prior to and follows immediately from this statement “No compulsion” which determines those Allah-God has deemed ‘evil ones’ who in essence have no chance to accept or deny ‘Truth’ because Allah-God has already decided their fate are determined evil (to put it mildly) and must be at the least shunned, and even those who may claim to have been converted still cannot be trusted, all in time to be justifiably subject to grievous harm and severest penalty. For ALL verses in the Quran are applicable for all time as the Quran itself stipulates. Not just one phrase picked out without stipulating what clearly significantly qualifies-circumscribes such a phrase-dishonesty comes to mind albeit to avoid significant cognitive dissonance.
003.118 O ye who believe! Take not into your intimacy those outside your ranks: They will not fail to corrupt you. They only desire your ruin: Rank hatred has already appeared from their mouths: What their hearts conceal is far worse.
003.119 ... When they meet you, they say, "We believe": But when they are alone, they bite off the very tips of their fingers at you in their rage. Say: "Perish in your rage;..
So the idea that ‘No compulsion’ determines the Islamic/Muslim religion determines Other cannot be forced to accept Islam or be offered the usual convert, be exiled or be murdered denies the qualification-circumscribing of ‘No compulsion’. For there is a whole section devoted to War against Other in the Quran and other verses which determine ‘No compulsion in reality a sickening farce.
Quran Surah 33 AL-AHZAB The Confederates
36 It is not fitting for a Believer, man or woman, when the matter has been decided by Allah and His Messenger, to have any option about their decision: if anyone disobeys Allah and his Messenger, he is indeed on a clearly wrong path.
....
56 Allah and His Angels send blessings on the Prophet: O ye that believe! Send ye blessings on him, and salute him with all respect.
57 Those who annoy Allah and his Messenger – Allah has cursed them in this world and in the Hereafter, and has prepared for them a humiliating Punishment.
58 And those who annoy believing men and women undeservedly, bear (on themselves) a calumny and a glaring sin.
....
60 Truly, if the Hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and those who stir up sedition in the city, desist not, we shall certainly stir thee up against them: then will they not be able to stay in it as thy neighbours for any length of time:
61 They shall have a curse on them: wherever they are found, they shall be seized and slain (without mercy).
62 (Such was) the practice (approved) of Allah among those who lived afortime: no change will they’ll find in the practice (approved) of Allah.
....
73 (With the result) that Allah has to punish the Hypocrites, men and women, and the Unbelievers, men and women, and Allah turns in Mercy to the Believers, men and women: for Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful."
Allah has to punish the Hypocrites-well then?
"Tunisia's Islamist Ennahda party will separate it religious activities from political ones, its chief said in statements published Thursday, declaring there was “no longer justification for political Islam” in the country post Arab spring."
'Tunisia's Ennahda ‘to separate politics from religion’, France24, 2016-05-20
Claiming there is 'no longer justification for political Islam' holds no justification, no authority when the core codex of Muslims the Quran and Muhammad's behavior determines Islam is a political ideology, and as such will be, not may be, imposed on humanity as not only a State method of organisation but inclusive of the ethics-beliefs social/political methods contained within the Quran, as well the Quran, Gods word, commands all Muslims to realise the Quran social/political template. The mere existence of a rationale model behavior in part or total being replicated in human space determines it political otherwise it exists as only a thought bubble with no applicability to actual human interaction this truthfully cannot in any way be applied to the Islamic ideology.
The ridiculous hypocrisy of the nature of their statement 'no longer justification for political Islam' is lost on the very politicians seeking to have Islamic ethics-beliefs-motivation social/political method created in their space. So what happens in such an ideological space in reality when even the organisation leadership stating there is 'no longer justification for political Islam' are themselves by the name 'Islamist Ennahda party' determined as members of a group subject to advancing Islamic political precepts.
"Already there are signs that some of the 5,500 Tunisians who have gone abroad, according to United Nations estimates, are seeking new targets at home and in Europe, where Tunisians have been implicated in several recent terrorist cases in France and Germany."
Tunisia Fears the Return of Thousands of Young Jihadists, NYT, CARLOTTA GALL, FEB. 25, 2017
The absolute madness which grips our policy reticence to hold religious fascist political organisations and source cultures to account for the political-social policy they create to subjugate Other and women, when we know for certain religious activities are intrinsically political activities and a political party 'Tunisia's Islamist Ennahda party' whose ethics-values beliefs, political-social method which are in fact based upon a specific religious ideological base Islam, will necessarily reflect these religious ethics-values beliefs, political-social method into policy.
"Religious thought does not exist in a vacuum; it both shapes politics and is shaped by politics."
Understanding Japan: A Cultural History, Professor Mark J. Ravina, Emory University, 2015
What will always, always be in the exact same space no matter what denial of cultural culpability comes from whatever segment of the Muslim behavoral variance?
"“IF BEN GUERDANE had been located next to Falluja, we would have liberated Iraq.” So (reportedly) said Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq, before he was killed a decade ago. He was referring reverentially to a town in south-eastern Tunisia that is one of the world’s biggest exporters of jihadists."
Terrorists returning home to Tunisia, The Economist, Jan 21st 2017
German police arrest Tunisian suspected of plotting Islamic State terrorist attack, WP, by Stephanie Kirchner February 1, 2017
Why are so many Tunisians joining the Islamic State?, WP, By Geoffrey Macdonald and Luke Waggoner January 27, 2017
"Tunisian women shout slogans during a demonstration outside parliament against allowing Tunisians who joined the ranks of jihadist groups to return to the country."
Security forces abuses threaten Tunisia reform: Amnesty, Daily Nation, AFP, FEBRUARY 14 2017
"Kazakhstan is officially a democratic, secular, unitary, constitutional republic with a diverse cultural heritage....Islam is the religion of about 70% of the population, with Christianity practised by 26%. Kazakhstan officially allows freedom of religion." Wikipedia, 3-2-2017
""Kazakhstan's authorities have systematically cleansed the country's news media of dissenting voices, and the arrest of Zhanbolat Mamay is one more step in that direction," said Nina Ognianova, CPJ's Europe and Central Asia Program coordinator."
Editor arrested in Kazakhstan, CPJ, Committee to Protect Journalists, February 13, 2017
Kazakhstan is an abusive dictatorship – the UK should not court it, Aigerim Dzhakisheva, The Guardian, Wednesday 21 May 2014
"The OSCE statement said official intimidation of the opposition "limited the possibility for a meaningful competition". The EU demanded Mr Nazarbayev take action against those responsible for fraud."
EU wants action against election (Kazakhstan)fraudsters, Nick Paton Walsh,Wednesday 7 December 2005
"Jewish children in Kazakhstan were singing Hebrew songs as they sang here, in a Muslim state and that reflects the kind of world we like to see: a world of tolerance, a world of diversity as opposed to the world that is being challenged today by the forces of barbarism and intolerance," he said. "This is a battle for the future of humanity."
Israel Prime Minister Netanyahu describes ‘battle for the future of humanity’ during Singapore visit, CNBC, Leslie Shaffer, 21-2-2017
"Kazakhstan introduced strict restrictions on practising non-recognised faiths and in 2012 cut the number of recognised faiths from nearly 50 to just 17."
Christians fined in Kazakhstan for meeting to worship Christ, WORLD, Ruth Gledhill EDITOR 19 July 2016
"Judge Akmaral Isayeva claimed that the Jehovah's Witnesses' "crime presents a danger to the public in that it violates a fundamental constitutional principle, the principle of equality". She goes on to claim that "observance of this principle is one of most important conditions for the existence and development of any civilised society""
KAZAKHSTAN: Sharing beliefs "grave crime" requiring detention?, Forum 18, by Mushfig Bayram, 2 February 2017
"Kazakhstan has detained Kuanysh Bashpayev for criticising the state-controlled Muslim Board, and Satimzhan Azatov for meeting Muslims without state permission. Both face criminal charges of "inciting religious hatred or discord", as does atheist Aleksandr Kharlamov facing a possible new trial. Bashpayev's trial opens 14 February."
KAZAKHSTAN: Criminal cases for meeting, criticising Muslim Board, By Mushfig Bayram, Forum 18, 6 February 2017
"In their desperate quest for personal power, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey and Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak of Malaysia appear to be not only destroying their personal reputations but also dragging their countries towards religious extremism and confrontation between national minorities.
..one cannot avoid noting the slow but steady Islamisation of both the private lives of Malaysia's people and their state."
Are we witnessing the end of moderate Islam in Malaysia and Turkey? – The Malaysian Insider, Daniel Woker, 11 August 2015 (Dr Daniel Woker is the former Swiss Ambassador to Australia, Singapore and Kuwait and now a Senior Lecturer at the University of St Gallen, Switzerland.)
"The Permatang Pauh MP also raised concern that two of the 15 arrested in connection to the attack were police personnel.
"I must therefore ask how extensively has IS infiltrated into the Royal Malaysian Police organisational structure?" she asked."
'No terrorism' misjudgment shows police ill-prepared, says PKR, malaysiakini, 4 Jul 2016
We live as others in the past desiring "a world of tolerance, a world of diversity" but we have intellectual-social-political elite utilising minutiae of 'micro-level data analysis, elite analysis and constructivist perspectives' redefining reality of a specific cultures dangerous rational system as normative within Other cultures space despite the bloody piles broken bodies and lives it systematically informs. Surrounded by infamy a cultural construct informs to determine "tolerance" exists where clearly it cannot nor ever has to the degree it can ever be included in "the kind of world we like to see" if Liberty, Equality and Fraternity are to retain the meaning many have sacrificed their lives for is insanity, given the obvious stark tokenism surrounded by an ocean of contradiction. "This is a battle for the future of humanity." but it will never be won by promoting as an example a culture of terror-genocide and tragic misogynistic outcome as an ideal societal state of "tolerance".
“How can someone be capable of that?” she said.
Orlando Gunman’s Wife Breaks Silence: ‘I Was Unaware’, NTY, By ADAM GOLDMAN, NOV. 1, 2016
"How"? This is "How":
Islamic/Muslim cultural development-codex derived process-Islamic/Muslim categories-concepts-heuristics-reasoning-symbols-mental models/sets-preconceptions-motivation - methods.= problem how to get to the Islamic/Muslim codex political-social utopian vision within a Other existent space with a significantly different political-social utopian vision = has always = burning buildings, broken bodies and lives. This is "How" it has come to pass ever since Mohammad walked demented out of his cave and decided to define Other as:
ISIS (Muslim) Fighters, Having Pledged to Fight or Die, Surrender en Masse, NYT, ROD NORDLAND, OCT. 8, 2017
"I don't mean participated, I mean observed."
Oskar Groening trial: Nazi bookkeeper of Auschwitz admits 'moral guilt' in German court, SMH, Michelle Martin, APRIL 22 2015
Berlin terror cell nabbed after arrests in Italy and Germany, DW, 28/4/2017
London terror alert: How serious is it?, BBC, Dominic Casciani, 28 April 2017
Turkish terrorism watch list includes more than 400 suspected Australian jihadists, ABC, 29/4/2017
The once peaceful and law abiding 'few' becoming the many as the 'few' have always been the many.
"The vote was fairly clear among the nearly 3 million Turkish passport holders living across Europe. After half of the ballots in Germany were counted, more than 63 percent voted “Yes,” ...
Support from Turks in Austria was even greater, at 72.3 percent, after about one fifth of votes were counted.......
Several European leaders have criticized Mr. Erdogan for cleansing the administration and intimidating the opposition. Since February German journalist Deniz Yücel has been detained for allegedly collaborating with anti-government forces."
Erdogan Wins More Power, Handlesblatt Global, John Blau John Blau 17. April 2017
"She added that "his trial focused heavily on Quranic law and little on any mitigating mental illness. As a result, Al-Shamri has been sentenced to death for being an atheist.""
Saudi Arabia will execute 'atheist for insulting the prophet' Ahmad Al-Shamri renounced Islam and uploaded his views on social media. The religious police soon visited. By Romil Patel, April 28, 2017
Freedom to choose- the terrorists are-become the manys cultural derived institutions enforcing the manys ethics-values-beliefs methodology.
“..terrorists typically are no more religiously devout than are non-terrorists (Atran, 2003), using religion to sanctify terrorism should be useful for generating additional motivational force to impel individual acts of terrorism as well as to sustain collective will for long campaigns of terrorism (Atran, 2003; Juergensmeyer, 2003).
Indeed, means end analysis of terrorism (Kruglanski & Fishman, 2006) implies a role for cultural (including religious) factors that influence many facets of self-regulation, including (a) the goals people select, (b) the motivational force that becomes attached to those goals, (c) error monitoring, (d) self-regulatory strength, and (e) the outputs at people’s disposal for modifying their behavior to maintain progress toward goal attainment. In other words, a self-regulation analysis of religion suggests that religion is well suited to motivate any behavior that is predicated on self-control and self-regulation, whether that behavior is studying hard for final exams or donning an explosives belt and then detonating it on a crowded city bus.”
Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: Associations, explanations, and implications.
Michael E. McCullough and Brian L. B. Willoughby - Psychological bulletin, 2009
“We need to ask ourselves if our religious institutions are producing faithful believers or the flag-bearers for different sects. We need to ask if the country is being united or divided in the name of religion,” the PM said.
...“Religious scholars in the past disagreed with each other, but they never incited hatred in their followers’ hearts regarding other sects,” Sharif added."
Pakistan PM seeks help from clerics in war against militants, Daka Tribune, March 12, 2017
"He told those in attendance that “terrorism had no links to religion but was groups created over the years came from several parts of the world with one goal in mind”.
Former Saudi justice minister tells EU parliament: Terrorism has no religion, AL ARABIYA, 13 March 2017
Both quotes above by Muslim leaders cannot be true at the same time, the numbers-groups and the fact they originate from 'several parts of the world' not only currently, when violent jihad against Other operated as a Muslim conversion-elimination method since the 7th century, statistically determines religion, the Islamic religious Quran codex construct of Other and how relations between Muslims and Other are to be managed, clearly determines these Muslim religious defined precepts have, are and will with Muslim family, community, institutions infant-child-adolescent-adult development process, result in Muslim terror, not as an unsubstantiated Islamic clerical or otherwise interpretation of the Quran but as its true reflection of the Muslim precepts contained in the Quran and its exemplars behavior.
“They severed his fingers and later beheaded and dismembered him, according to details from audio recordings”
Audio Offers Gruesome Details of Jamal Khashoggi Killing, Turkish Official Says, NYT, By Carlotta Gall and David D. Kirkpatrick, Oct. 17, 2018
Quran: Surah 8 Al-Anfal - The Spoils of War
12 "Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): 'I am with you: give firmness to the believers: I will instil terror into the hearts of the unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their fingertips off them. '
It is the fact these interpretations are able to exist at all justifying and authorising such Muslim terrorist behavior on such a scale from the very beginning of Muslims existence in the 7th century, with only lulls due to political/social impediments in particular spaces preventing the enforcement of Muhammad's words to the letter, until required economic-political-social thresholds had been reached determines Muslims do as a culture inherently inform terror not peace, even within their own culture, due to the very nature of the construct of Other laid down by Mohammed where each in their turn even Muslims themselves will be not may be subject to Muslim terror.
“Jihad defined
Webster defines jihad as “a holy war waged on behalf is learn as a religious duty”, and “crusade for a principle or belief” (Mirriam–Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 11th ed.).
What does the sharia, this great body of law, teach about jihad? A few Muslim scholars insist that Jihad only refers to the internal struggle of the soul and has no reference to military action against an external enemy or another religion. A few passages in the Koran might perhaps be interpreted in this manner, but definitely not all of them. The occasional reference to the “struggle in his way” might conceivably be understood as a moral struggle, although the context is dubious at best. The same Sura ads, “whether unarmed or well-equipped, march on and fight for the cause of Allah, with your wealth and with your persons,” and finally, “Prophet, make war on the unbelievers and the hypocrites.” This takes Jihad out of the realm of mere internal struggle.
Let those who would exchange the life of this world for the hereafter,
fight for the cause of Allah; whoever fights for the cause of God, whether
they die or conquer, We shall richly reward them… The true believers
fight for the cause of God, but the infidels fight for idols.
At one point it seems that Mohammed declares war on Jews and Christians unless they embraced is land. “Fight against such of those to whom the scriptures were given as believe neither in Allah nor the Last day… [who] do not embrace the true faith until they pay tribute out of hand and are utterly subdued.” That can hardly be taken to refer to an internal struggle! The call to kill adulterers is crystal-clear: “when the sacred months [four months out of the year] are over slay the adulterers where ever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them. If they repent, and take to prayer and pay the arms tax, let them to go their way. God is forgiving and merciful.”
Fighting encouraged
In the Koran, vigorous warfare is encouraged: “when you meet the unbelievers in the battlefield strike off their heads, and when you have laid them low, find your captors firmly. Then grant them their freedom or take ransom from the period” the Koran explicitly states that a different rule prevails for fellow Muslims. “He that kills a believer by design, shall burn in hell forever.” Those who embrace is land and then deserted are to be seized “and put them to death where ever you find them.” An apostate can be killed outright. War is lawful against infidels and apostates, and these wars count as Jihad.”The Popular Encyclopaedia of World Religions, Richard Wolff, 2007
"The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter."
What Does Islam Teach About Violence, The Religion of Peace, 2017
The existence of contrary text, as the Quran itself dictates does not negate the other each edict of behavior-action stands and is therefore able to be utilised as justification and authorisation of Muslim behavior be it peaceful or violent, it is therefore erroneous to claim Islam-Muslims ideology informs peace simply because a few pieces of text so called peaceful text exists in an ocean of violent justification-authorisation against Other and any adherent acting otherwise is misinterpreting Islamic codex is a lie.
Even supposed contrary text utilised to determine Muslims as peaceful is the Verse (ayah) 256 of Al-Baqara
254… Those who reject faith – they are the wrongdoers.
256 “Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error whoever rejects Evil and beliefs in Allah hath grasped the most trustworthy handheld, that never breaks. And Allah heareth and knoweth all things.”
257… Of those who reject faith the patrons are the Evil ones: from light they will lead them forth into the depths of darkness. They will be companions of fire, to dwell therein (forever).
Firstly "no compulsion" is simply a reiteration of a previously stated fact it is God who determines if an individual is predestined to be saved or condemned attempting to compel Other to convert is therefore a wasted effort. Such a statement in no way protects Other from violence for if they reject Islam this is a trigger for their demise predicated upon the violent text within the Quran. Silence is not even a protection as the Quran determines it is a useless exercise Other wouldn't understand anyway. Secondly look at what construct of Other is in the exact same section 34 of the Al-Baqara Quran text surrounding verse 256 determining rejectors of the Islamic faith as deviants involved in wrongdoing, and worse 'Evil'. What do cultures do to those they determines as wrongdoers and evil? The Islamic-Muslim culture sets out clearly what happens and it is not benign.
"I argued that Muslims must uphold freedom of conscience, in line with the Quranic dictum “No compulsion in religion.”" writes Mustafa Akyol.
A Proposal for Islam, NYT, Mustafa Akyol, 28-9-2017
As with the interlinking construct of 'innocents' in the Quran, the source of Muslim ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation social/political method, "No compulsion” is already qualified-circumscribed before the statement "No compulsion" is even reached.
002.006 As to those who reject Faith, it is the same to them whether thou warn them or do not warn them; they will not believe.
002.007 God hath set a seal on their hearts and on their hearing, and on their eyes is a veil; great is the penalty they (incur).
002:018 They are utterly deaf, dumb, and blind; they can no longer recover.
"No compulsion" is in fact simply a restatement of an already Allah Quran stipulated set of statements, Allah-God is the one who decides who will believe or not believe –“God hath set a seal on their hearts and on their hearing, and on their eyes is a veil.” Which is a stipulation repeated in the verse following immediately after the verse determining ‘No Compulsion’ –
“.002.257 Allah (is the) Protecting Guardian (of) those who believe[d]. He brings them out from [the] darkness towards [the] light”.
002.256 Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error: whoever rejects evil and believes in God hath grasped the most trustworthy hand- hold, that never breaks. And God heareth and knowethall things.
002.257 Allah (is the) Protecting Guardian (of) those who believe[d]. He brings them out from [the] darkness towards [the] light. And those who disbelieve(d) their guardians (are) the evil ones, they bring them out from the light towards [the] darkness. Those (are the) companions (of) the Fire, they in it will abide forever.
The Quran therefore determines it is impossible to compel even if you wanted to, you cannot force-convert another person to believe be it you utilise non-violent methods or otherwise Allah God decides. “Let there be no compulsion in religion” is simply restating the obvious. So it has no meaning no inherent protection for Other and cannot be utilised in an argument to determine it does for what surrounds it?
The trouble is what exists in verses prior to and follows immediately from this statement “No compulsion” which determines those Allah-God has deemed ‘evil ones’ who in essence have no chance to accept or deny ‘Truth’ because Allah-God has already decided their fate are determined evil (to put it mildly) and must be at the least shunned, and even those who may claim to have been converted still cannot be trusted, all in time to be justifiably subject to grievous harm and severest penalty. For ALL verses in the Quran are applicable for all time as the Quran itself stipulates. Not just one phrase picked out without stipulating what clearly significantly qualifies-circumscribes such a phrase-dishonesty comes to mind albeit to avoid significant cognitive dissonance.
003.118 O ye who believe! Take not into your intimacy those outside your ranks: They will not fail to corrupt you. They only desire your ruin: Rank hatred has already appeared from their mouths: What their hearts conceal is far worse.
003.119 ... When they meet you, they say, "We believe": But when they are alone, they bite off the very tips of their fingers at you in their rage. Say: "Perish in your rage;..
So the idea that ‘No compulsion’ determines the Islamic/Muslim religion determines Other cannot be forced to accept Islam or be offered the usual convert, be exiled or be murdered denies the qualification-circumscribing of ‘No compulsion’. For there is a whole section devoted to War against Other in the Quran and other verses which determine ‘No compulsion in reality a sickening farce.
Quran Surah 33 AL-AHZAB The Confederates
36 It is not fitting for a Believer, man or woman, when the matter has been decided by Allah and His Messenger, to have any option about their decision: if anyone disobeys Allah and his Messenger, he is indeed on a clearly wrong path.
....
56 Allah and His Angels send blessings on the Prophet: O ye that believe! Send ye blessings on him, and salute him with all respect.
57 Those who annoy Allah and his Messenger – Allah has cursed them in this world and in the Hereafter, and has prepared for them a humiliating Punishment.
58 And those who annoy believing men and women undeservedly, bear (on themselves) a calumny and a glaring sin.
....
60 Truly, if the Hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and those who stir up sedition in the city, desist not, we shall certainly stir thee up against them: then will they not be able to stay in it as thy neighbours for any length of time:
61 They shall have a curse on them: wherever they are found, they shall be seized and slain (without mercy).
62 (Such was) the practice (approved) of Allah among those who lived afortime: no change will they’ll find in the practice (approved) of Allah.
....
73 (With the result) that Allah has to punish the Hypocrites, men and women, and the Unbelievers, men and women, and Allah turns in Mercy to the Believers, men and women: for Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful."
Allah has to punish the Hypocrites-well then?
"Tunisia's Islamist Ennahda party will separate it religious activities from political ones, its chief said in statements published Thursday, declaring there was “no longer justification for political Islam” in the country post Arab spring."
'Tunisia's Ennahda ‘to separate politics from religion’, France24, 2016-05-20
Claiming there is 'no longer justification for political Islam' holds no justification, no authority when the core codex of Muslims the Quran and Muhammad's behavior determines Islam is a political ideology, and as such will be, not may be, imposed on humanity as not only a State method of organisation but inclusive of the ethics-beliefs social/political methods contained within the Quran, as well the Quran, Gods word, commands all Muslims to realise the Quran social/political template. The mere existence of a rationale model behavior in part or total being replicated in human space determines it political otherwise it exists as only a thought bubble with no applicability to actual human interaction this truthfully cannot in any way be applied to the Islamic ideology.
The ridiculous hypocrisy of the nature of their statement 'no longer justification for political Islam' is lost on the very politicians seeking to have Islamic ethics-beliefs-motivation social/political method created in their space. So what happens in such an ideological space in reality when even the organisation leadership stating there is 'no longer justification for political Islam' are themselves by the name 'Islamist Ennahda party' determined as members of a group subject to advancing Islamic political precepts.
"Already there are signs that some of the 5,500 Tunisians who have gone abroad, according to United Nations estimates, are seeking new targets at home and in Europe, where Tunisians have been implicated in several recent terrorist cases in France and Germany."
Tunisia Fears the Return of Thousands of Young Jihadists, NYT, CARLOTTA GALL, FEB. 25, 2017
The absolute madness which grips our policy reticence to hold religious fascist political organisations and source cultures to account for the political-social policy they create to subjugate Other and women, when we know for certain religious activities are intrinsically political activities and a political party 'Tunisia's Islamist Ennahda party' whose ethics-values beliefs, political-social method which are in fact based upon a specific religious ideological base Islam, will necessarily reflect these religious ethics-values beliefs, political-social method into policy.
"Religious thought does not exist in a vacuum; it both shapes politics and is shaped by politics."
Understanding Japan: A Cultural History, Professor Mark J. Ravina, Emory University, 2015
What will always, always be in the exact same space no matter what denial of cultural culpability comes from whatever segment of the Muslim behavoral variance?
"“IF BEN GUERDANE had been located next to Falluja, we would have liberated Iraq.” So (reportedly) said Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq, before he was killed a decade ago. He was referring reverentially to a town in south-eastern Tunisia that is one of the world’s biggest exporters of jihadists."
Terrorists returning home to Tunisia, The Economist, Jan 21st 2017
German police arrest Tunisian suspected of plotting Islamic State terrorist attack, WP, by Stephanie Kirchner February 1, 2017
Why are so many Tunisians joining the Islamic State?, WP, By Geoffrey Macdonald and Luke Waggoner January 27, 2017
"Tunisian women shout slogans during a demonstration outside parliament against allowing Tunisians who joined the ranks of jihadist groups to return to the country."
Security forces abuses threaten Tunisia reform: Amnesty, Daily Nation, AFP, FEBRUARY 14 2017
"Kazakhstan is officially a democratic, secular, unitary, constitutional republic with a diverse cultural heritage....Islam is the religion of about 70% of the population, with Christianity practised by 26%. Kazakhstan officially allows freedom of religion." Wikipedia, 3-2-2017
""Kazakhstan's authorities have systematically cleansed the country's news media of dissenting voices, and the arrest of Zhanbolat Mamay is one more step in that direction," said Nina Ognianova, CPJ's Europe and Central Asia Program coordinator."
Editor arrested in Kazakhstan, CPJ, Committee to Protect Journalists, February 13, 2017
Kazakhstan is an abusive dictatorship – the UK should not court it, Aigerim Dzhakisheva, The Guardian, Wednesday 21 May 2014
"The OSCE statement said official intimidation of the opposition "limited the possibility for a meaningful competition". The EU demanded Mr Nazarbayev take action against those responsible for fraud."
EU wants action against election (Kazakhstan)fraudsters, Nick Paton Walsh,Wednesday 7 December 2005
"Jewish children in Kazakhstan were singing Hebrew songs as they sang here, in a Muslim state and that reflects the kind of world we like to see: a world of tolerance, a world of diversity as opposed to the world that is being challenged today by the forces of barbarism and intolerance," he said. "This is a battle for the future of humanity."
Israel Prime Minister Netanyahu describes ‘battle for the future of humanity’ during Singapore visit, CNBC, Leslie Shaffer, 21-2-2017
"Kazakhstan introduced strict restrictions on practising non-recognised faiths and in 2012 cut the number of recognised faiths from nearly 50 to just 17."
Christians fined in Kazakhstan for meeting to worship Christ, WORLD, Ruth Gledhill EDITOR 19 July 2016
"Judge Akmaral Isayeva claimed that the Jehovah's Witnesses' "crime presents a danger to the public in that it violates a fundamental constitutional principle, the principle of equality". She goes on to claim that "observance of this principle is one of most important conditions for the existence and development of any civilised society""
KAZAKHSTAN: Sharing beliefs "grave crime" requiring detention?, Forum 18, by Mushfig Bayram, 2 February 2017
"Kazakhstan has detained Kuanysh Bashpayev for criticising the state-controlled Muslim Board, and Satimzhan Azatov for meeting Muslims without state permission. Both face criminal charges of "inciting religious hatred or discord", as does atheist Aleksandr Kharlamov facing a possible new trial. Bashpayev's trial opens 14 February."
KAZAKHSTAN: Criminal cases for meeting, criticising Muslim Board, By Mushfig Bayram, Forum 18, 6 February 2017
"In their desperate quest for personal power, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey and Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak of Malaysia appear to be not only destroying their personal reputations but also dragging their countries towards religious extremism and confrontation between national minorities.
..one cannot avoid noting the slow but steady Islamisation of both the private lives of Malaysia's people and their state."
Are we witnessing the end of moderate Islam in Malaysia and Turkey? – The Malaysian Insider, Daniel Woker, 11 August 2015 (Dr Daniel Woker is the former Swiss Ambassador to Australia, Singapore and Kuwait and now a Senior Lecturer at the University of St Gallen, Switzerland.)
"The Permatang Pauh MP also raised concern that two of the 15 arrested in connection to the attack were police personnel.
"I must therefore ask how extensively has IS infiltrated into the Royal Malaysian Police organisational structure?" she asked."
'No terrorism' misjudgment shows police ill-prepared, says PKR, malaysiakini, 4 Jul 2016
We live as others in the past desiring "a world of tolerance, a world of diversity" but we have intellectual-social-political elite utilising minutiae of 'micro-level data analysis, elite analysis and constructivist perspectives' redefining reality of a specific cultures dangerous rational system as normative within Other cultures space despite the bloody piles broken bodies and lives it systematically informs. Surrounded by infamy a cultural construct informs to determine "tolerance" exists where clearly it cannot nor ever has to the degree it can ever be included in "the kind of world we like to see" if Liberty, Equality and Fraternity are to retain the meaning many have sacrificed their lives for is insanity, given the obvious stark tokenism surrounded by an ocean of contradiction. "This is a battle for the future of humanity." but it will never be won by promoting as an example a culture of terror-genocide and tragic misogynistic outcome as an ideal societal state of "tolerance".
“How can someone be capable of that?” she said.
Orlando Gunman’s Wife Breaks Silence: ‘I Was Unaware’, NTY, By ADAM GOLDMAN, NOV. 1, 2016
"How"? This is "How":
Islamic/Muslim cultural development-codex derived process-Islamic/Muslim categories-concepts-heuristics-reasoning-symbols-mental models/sets-preconceptions-motivation - methods.= problem how to get to the Islamic/Muslim codex political-social utopian vision within a Other existent space with a significantly different political-social utopian vision = has always = burning buildings, broken bodies and lives. This is "How" it has come to pass ever since Mohammad walked demented out of his cave and decided to define Other as:
'Deaf, dumb, and blind, fools, in utter darkness, deceive themselves, diseased, hangout with their evil ones, wander like blind ones, bartered Guidance for error, lost true direction, in utter darkness, make mischief therein and shed blood, transgressors, apes-animals, despised and rejected, ignorant, illiterates, do nothing but conjecture, seek gain in evil, God's curse is on them for their blasphemy, sold their souls, insolent, envious, wrong-doers, greedy, idolaters, perverse, buyers of (magic), they conceal, in schism, wrong, wicked, etc - and therefore justifiably destined for grievous harm or severest penalty-.to be smite above their necks and have all their finger tips cut off.'
The result:
"She was taken into custody by F.B.I. agents at her home outside of San Francisco, where she had been living with her young son."
F.B.I. Arrests Wife of Killer in Orlando Mass Shooting, NTY, By ADAM GOLDMAN and LAN BLINDER, JAN. 16, 2017
Nigeria Maiduguri: Two 'young girls' used as human bombs, BBC, 12/12/2016
Tunisia inquest shown police map of killer's spree, BBC, 17-1-2017
Tunisian Officers, Branded ‘Cowardly’ During Massacre, Face Charges, By DECLAN WALSH and NOUR YOUSSEF, MARCH 1, 2017
Hindu Temples and Homes in Bangladesh Are Attacked by Muslim Crowds, NTY, By JULFIKAR ALI MANIK and ELLEN BARRY, NOV. 2, 2016
"Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono had backed plans for the protest, drew tens of thousands of people.
The accusation of blasphemy against Jakarta Gov. Basuki "Ahok" Tjahaja Purnama, an ethnic Chinese and minority Christian who is an ally of Jokowi"
Indonesia President Cancels Trip Abroad After Deadly Protest, By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, NOV. 5, 2016
Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono Indonesian politician and retired Army general officer who was the President of Indonesia from 2004 to 2014. He is currently the chairman of the Democratic Party of Indonesia.
"Around 100,000 Muslims took to the streets on Friday demanding the prosecution of Jakarta Governor Basuki “Ahok” Tjahaja Purnama for alleged blasphemy. They called on the police to immediately detain Ahok.(JP/Wendra Ajistyatama)"
Rally erupts in violence, The Jakarta Post, Haeril Halim and Ina Parlina, November 5 2016
"Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono I was heavily criticized for fanning the flames of religious anger against Ahok back on November 2 (shortly before the 4/11 anti-Ahok rally) when he said, “If you do not want this country to burn with the anger of justice seekers, Pak Ahok must be prosecuted. Do not let him be considered above the law.”
At the same time, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono also lashed out against the Jokowi’s administration, accusing them of spreading false information suggesting he was the mastermind behind the upcoming rally.
After violence broke out towards the end of the 4/11 protest, Jokowi addressed the country and said the violence had been “steered by political actors who were exploiting the situation”, which some observers took as a veiled reference to Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono."
Ahok’s lawyer says SBY asked MUI to issue blasphemy fatwa, will prove MUI chairman lied about it in court, Coconuts Jakarta Feb. 1, 2017
Indonesian Presidential election results:
"Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono I was heavily criticized for fanning the flames of religious anger against Ahok back on November 2 (shortly before the 4/11 anti-Ahok rally) when he said, “If you do not want this country to burn with the anger of justice seekers, Pak Ahok must be prosecuted. Do not let him be considered above the law.”
At the same time, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono also lashed out against the Jokowi’s administration, accusing them of spreading false information suggesting he was the mastermind behind the upcoming rally.
After violence broke out towards the end of the 4/11 protest, Jokowi addressed the country and said the violence had been “steered by political actors who were exploiting the situation”, which some observers took as a veiled reference to Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono."
Ahok’s lawyer says SBY asked MUI to issue blasphemy fatwa, will prove MUI chairman lied about it in court, Coconuts Jakarta Feb. 1, 2017
Indonesian Presidential election results:
| 2009 | Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono | Boediono | Votes 73,874,562 | 60.80% | Elected |
|---|
| 2014 | Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono | Boediono | Votes 12,728,913 | 10.19% | Elected 87 |
|---|
 |
| Indonesian Muslims gather at the National Monument in Jakarta during a rally against governor Basuki "Ahok" Tjahaja Purnama, who is being prosecuted for blasphemy. Photo: AP |
Police estimated crowd numbers at around 500,000 to 600,000 but some demonstrators claimed on social media the figure was closer to a couple of million."
High-profile Indonesians arrested ahead of major blasphemy rally in Jakarta, SMH, Jewel Topsfield, 2-13-2016
Only the 'few'? When will the self-described moderate 'many' utilised by the elites unleashing terror-genocide against their own citizens admit their sickening deceit and the true reality is one where the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex(textual and exemplar (messianic) template) is a political/social threat for Other cultures?
"Some Islamic groups had urged voters not to re-elect Ahok on the basis of verse 51 from the fifth sura or chapter of the Koran, al-Ma'ida, which some interpret as prohibiting Muslims from living under the leadership of a non-Muslim."
Violence in Jakarta as Muslims protest, demand Christian governor Ahok be jailed, Jewel Topsfield. Sydney Morning Herald,
"O you who have believed, do not take the Jews and the Christians as allies. They are [in fact] allies of one another. And whoever is an ally to them among you - then indeed, he is [one] of them. Indeed, Allah guides not the wrongdoing people."
verse 51 from the fifth sura or chapter of the Koran, al-Ma'ida
When you accept without immediate response and even provide political/social support for a cultures existence in your space, which has a clear codex terror-genocide categorisation of Other, with current and historical evidence of the rising social hostility and insidious political/social forms it creates, even providing excuses for the bloody bodies this culture informs in your streets what will inevitably be your fellow citizens fate.
"..All roads to the frontier were jammed with fleeing taxicabs and motor-cars. At the aerodrome and the stations a medley of princes, peasants ans paupers, world famous bankers, obscure proletarians, Jews from the highest rank to the lowliest, army officers, police officials and the Communists and Socialists they had arrested and punished, Catholic priests, civil servants and journalists desperately tired to find places on the departing train.
....
there were Nazi traitors everywhere, a women curses of the men went unheeded. Then came the first storm-troopers, half uniformed, half armed, but all with dreaded Swastika brassard, flushed with triumph, hoarse with shouting and thirsting for vengeance. ... fine-toothcomb and dog-whips ... dragged out and herded to prison.. trembling survivors slowly moving off to safety."
TERROR UNCHAINED, FALLEN BASTIONS, The Central European Tragedy, p310, by G. E. R. Gedye,
We know what happens when any cultures codex defines Other as less, evil,.. we see it in our once harmonious peaceful streets. 'Extremists' from whose perspective yours or theirs? The very underpinning of terror-genocide against Other a cultures determination of exclusion-rejection of Other is supported openly by Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono - the good moderate? How are millions only the 'few'. And is it not the fact a culture can and does systemically create the few with such violent views and method directly from their codex that must be the cause for concern for the safety of citizens and the very culture citizens hold to, to protect Liberty, Equality and Fraternity?
"Concern infiltrated by extremist elements"? Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono an extremist? Is the fact these Muslims are in the streets are demanding vocally a person be prosecuted even demands for his death not be a cause to determine such a demand be determined from a Democratic Liberty, Equality perspective as extreme? The utilisation and support of a Blasphemy paradigm itself not extreme?
It is appalling disingenuous of any person who has read the Quran to even infer they have no idea why Muslims continue to murder Other in the tradition of the Muslim exemplar Mohammad, author of such an ethical-belief text of hatred and motivator language of terror-genocide. This is the cause of Muslim terror the Islamic/Muslim codex construct of Other and Mohammad's exemplar behavior necessary because the ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation methodology of the Islamic/Muslim culture are so significantly different and oppressive to Other cultures in the same space, anything else are mere circumstance.
No culture has a right to visit terror-genocide against another culture however 'sacred' the fallible human abstracts utilised to justify and authorise its continuing existence to systemically inform the same - be it perpetrated by the 'few' created and sustained by the 'many' or the 'few' in time as elsewhere, as they inevitably do, becoming the 'many'.
"After the attacks in New York and Washington of 11 September 2001, it is clear that non-Western news media sources provide a very different perspective on current affairs from Western media sources. While Islam has been portrayed as a religion of terrorists by the Western media, reporting in the Muslim world has been equally heavy with anti-US/Western bias. One such example is Pakistan’s new private electronic media, within which the US is often demonised and by contrast the Taliban glorified. By liberalising Pakistan’s private electronic media in 2002, General Pervez Musharraf expected a turn towards modernisation. Yet the private electronic media continued to be a contributing factor in glorifying and encouraging many of the terrorists’ causes. Moreover, competition for better ratings often led many private television channels to adopt anti-American narratives. A decade later, Pakistani society faces pervasive radicalisation where moderate voices seem either weak or absent."
The Role of Private Electronic Media in Radicalising Pakistan, Kiran Hassan, Taylor and Francis Online, 27 Jan 2014
The unfathomable grief of just one child let alone the thousands upon thousands past, present and to come is not worth having such a religious ideological template remain in humanities streets. Yet alas by excusing a cultures culpability you do, even blaming Other for complaining they are being attacked by such cultures systemically delivering terror-genocide, determining as violence is endemic-worse in other societies surely the Western space must expect to suffer the same fate with equanimity, 'Grow Up' 'confidently' with Muslim terror, for surely the benefits of culinary delights outweigh the piles of bloody bodies in our streets.
"Dr Clarke Jones, who worked as a national security official for 17 years, said the minister's remarks risk "creating the terrorists of the future, if I want to be blunt".
...
Professor Clive Williams, a former senior defence official now at the Centre for Military and Security Law at the ANU, slammed the minister's comments as " counterproductive""
Peter Dutton's remarks on Lebanese Muslims risk 'creating terrorists of future', SMH, Deborah Snow, NOVEMBER 24 2016
"A shocking number of anti-Muslim, self-described “experts” are seen regularly in the media, where they spread falsehoods that too often go uncontested. Their rhetoric has toxic consequences, from promoting xenophobia, to poisoning democratic debate, to inspiring hate violence...
“We hope journalists will use this guide to learn more about these extremists and the damage they cause to society and either deny them a public platform altogether or be better prepared to publicly challenge their hateful rhetoric and misinformation,"
THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER, October 26, 2016
"We have to grow with the threat, and we have to do it in a confident manner,” Professor Siracusa said. (Human Security and International Diplomacy)
Two Sydney schools in lockdown as police unions call for support against extremists SBS 20 OCT 2015
"We have to stop with this debate of neutrality and secularity in Belgium and recognise and accept our multicultural society in all its manifestations. Not just when we want to drink mint tea or eat Turkish pita." sociologist Corinne Torrekens, a specialist in Muslim communities at the Free University of Brussels."
Terror sparks integration debate in France, Belgium, DW, Elizabeth Bryant, Molenbeek/Sevran, 05.04.2016
"It's not a question of Muslims being integrated, it's that society isn't integrating Muslims," says Alexandre Piettre, a sociologist at the Societies, Religions and Secularism Group, a Paris-based think-tank.
Terror sparks integration debate in France, Belgium, DW, Elizabeth Bryant, Molenbeek/Sevran, 05.04.2016
Feminist Swedish Politicians Defends Migrant Rapists, ‘Worse’ When Western Men Do It by LIAM DEACON, 5 Jul 2016
"..Paris attacks (current attacks developing within Western space) .. a momentary brutal disruption .- a momentary disturbance - in clear contrast to many countries.. Congo, Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon of uninterrupted terror and brutality .. we (the West) live in a kind of glasshouse, in which the terrorist violence for the most part exists in the public imagination as a threat that explodes intermittently .. the complete dominance of cultural capitalism (determines) "any such disruptions can be 'at most domestic accidents.'"
AGAINST THE DOUBLE BLACKMAIL, Refugees, Terror, and Other Troubles with Neighbours, Slavoj Zizek, 2016
Such ideological templates for behavior depicted above and detailed below determine such religious or secular ideologies need to be removed from humanities private and public spheres. Importing or allowing flows of adherents of religious or secular ideologies-cultures across ones borders which by mere observation let alone utilising scientific methodology, theory derived evidence prove such ideology-culture in time and space have, will and do inform increasing social hostility indices and the exact same tragic outcomes they have contributed to by adherence to such ideological-cultural ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology in their past cultural space is a very dangerous policy for existent and future citizens. Surely the fallible human abstract constructs of Multiculturalism and Freedom of Religion are failing to deliver the peace and harmony their promoters promise and require immediate review.
Pathological altruism must not be the starting point for any inter-cultural policy as it ignores a reality not all cultures represent the same inherent threat to Other, and indeed even regards their own adherents particularly women, and also social psychology determines once socialized within a culture it is neigh impossible except for outliers to change the 'mind' of a cultures adherents to the degree cultures inherently informing terror-genocide will simply stop doing so - for there is a reason why such cultural behavior is systemic - it is culturally necessary - as it will be found fear is required to not only to maintain internal adherence but also Other acceptance - for the ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation methodology of the attacking cultures are inherently so significantly different then Other cultures in the same space 'fear' derived from terror-genocide is the only option.
This ISIS defector said he was an innocent bystander. A new video questions his story. WP By Souad Mekhennet and Greg Miller October 4, 2016
The question regards the 'innocent' bystander is not in the end to be asked of or answered by the individual cultural adherent alone, but of the culture which creates and sustains them for in not asking the question nor deriving an answer regards the cultures 'innocent' 'many' bystanders culpability who participate directly in the creation and sustaining of the 'innocent' bystander 'few' due to the utilisation of invalid dangerous assumptions such as not-religion, etc humanity will continue to reap a terrible reward for such reticence.
'Not religion'
"Religious thought does not exist in a vacuum; it both shapes politics and is shaped by politics."
Understanding Japan: A Cultural History, Professor Mark J. Ravina, Emory University, 2015
"Religions, especially, historically as well as currently, are recognized to be chronically implicated in this discord and violence, directed at those beyond their artificially defined boundaries of theological doctrine, and, as often, towards those claiming common religious identities but who have fragmented into sectarian factions and conflict (Mlodinow 2012, 164). Those of us with an eye towards history—or even towards current events—know that any simple congruence of religion and prosociality has never been the case."
Pro-and assortative-sociality in the formation and maintenance of religious groups, LH Martin, D Wiebe, 2016
"Pope Francis said on Tuesday that the Roman Catholic Church’s teaching that women cannot be ordained as priests was likely to last forever."
Readers React After Pope Francis Says Ban on Female Priests Is Most Likely Permanent
By THE NEW YORK TIMES,NOV. 2, 2016
Royal commission into child sexual abuse: 1,880 alleged perpetrators identified in Catholic Church, ABC, By Philippa McDonald and Riley Stuart, 7-2-2017
Father Tom Doyle says church teaching on human sexuality a major factor in child sexual abuse crisis, Newcastle Herald, Joanne McCarthy, 7 Feb 2017
Hindu Temples and Homes in Bangladesh Are Attacked by Muslim Crowds
NTY, By JULFIKAR ALI MANIK and ELLEN BARRY, NOV. 2, 2016
"The formal end to the French mission comes as a fresh wave of bloodshed shook the troubled nation, spearheaded by rival Muslim and Christian militia groups."
Fears of fresh violence in CAR as France ends military mission, France24, 2016-10-30
"More than 100,000 people had already been sacked or suspended and 37,000 arrested since the failed coup, in an unprecedented crackdown the government says is necessary to root out all supporters of Gulen from the state apparatus.
Thousands more academics, teachers, health workers, prison guards and forensics experts were among the latest to be removed from their posts through two new executive decrees published on the Official Gazette late on Saturday.
.....
The decrees have ordered the closure of 15 more newspapers, wires and magazines, which report from the largely Kurdish southeast, bringing the total number of media organisations closed since the emergency rule in July to nearly 160.
In another move set to anger President Tayyip Erdogan's opponents, the ability of universities to elect their own rectors was also abolished. Erdogan will from now on directly appoint the rectors from the candidates nominated by the High Educational Board (YOK)."Turkey fires thousands more civil servants, shuts media outlets, France24, 2016-10-30
"The State Department previously advised Americans to carefully consider the need to travel to Turkey, warning that American tourists had been singled out as targets by international and domestic terrorist organizations."
U.S. Tells Families of Istanbul Consulate Staff to Leave Turkey, NTY, By CEYLAN YEGINSU, OCT. 30, 2016
"..true religions are the development of the capacity that humanity has to transcend itself towards the absolute. The religious phenomenon is transcendent and it has to do with truth, beauty, goodness and unity. If there isn't this openness, there is no transcendence, there is no true religion, there is idolatry. The opening to transcendence then absolutely cannot be a cause of terrorism, because this opening is always united to the search for truth, beauty, goodness and unity."
Pope Francis interview: Excerpts on ecumenism, terrorism and gossip, David Gibson Religion News Service | Oct. 28, 2016
"The Vatican announced that 27 new members will join the Congregation for Divine Worship (CDW) and the Discipline of the Sacraments, led by Cardinal Robert Sarah. These appointments will most likely have a direct influence on decisions concerning all aspects of the liturgy of the Church.
The CDW under Cardinal Sarah, one of the most fearless prelates in the Church, has published advisories of major importance in the recent past to safeguard the Roman liturgy and combat liturgical abuses. Many Catholic observers fear this “conservative” line will now come to an end."
Pope Francis again elevates Church progressives in complete overhaul of Vatican liturgy office, Jan Bentz, Lifesite, Wed Nov 2, 2016
The struggle for defining "truth, beauty, goodness and unity" happens exclusively in the human realm, to claim otherwise is "idolatry", a worthless transcendent exercise in delusion, hypocrisy, whilst utilising human political manipulation to define your 'vision' of "truth, beauty, goodness and unity" within the existent bounds of human derived cultural codex and exemplar behavior inference, metaphors, analogy controlled-imposed by the cultural clique holding the reigns-families-communities-institutions and whip-altruistic enforcers.
How the adherent horse behavioral variance will respond dependent upon a combination of system strength required relative to how transparent is authorisation-justification of the cultural codex and exemplary behavior to "truth, beauty, goodness and unity". Clearly the Catholic version of this transcendent "openness" excludes women, Catholic hierarchy and codex and as well in some cases exemplar behavior, as with many other religions, "truth, beauty, goodness and unity" denies the equality of women to man and therefore sets the framework for the continuing erroneous subjugation of women to Mans leadership, abuse and the reason controlled sexuality.
Religion is a moral framework developed to justify and authorise worldly moral decisions based upon the moral bounds set by religious texts and exemplar behaviour to claim otherwise is pure deception, deceit.
"..study investigated the influence of individual differences in religious thoughts and feelings, social desirability and mood on emotions and decisions in moral dilemmas that pit social welfare against harming another person. In order to increase emotional salience, moral dilemmas were framed as personal choices. Results indicated that the tendency to seek religious guidance in everyday life, and social desirability positively predicted deontological choices (i.e., refusing to harm one person in order to save several people). In addition, individual differences in religious feelings positively predicted negative emotion presence in these moral dilemmas. These results highlight the motivational and emotional dimensions of religiosity that influence moral choice and emotional experience in moral dilemmas."
Religiosity enhances emotion and deontological choice in moral dilemmas, Raluca D. Szekely, Adrian Opre, Andrei C. Miu, 2015
"Religious prosociality and aggression are real, concern distinct kinds of targets, and are at the heart of personal religiosity.
...
Taken together, the two studies suggest that “loving your neighbor” and “hating the sinner” are two attitudes that coexist among religious people and translate into behavior. Religiosity implies both real prosocial behavior toward in-group members in need and real aggressive behavior toward people who threaten religious moral values. The two sides of religion seem to coexist within the same people: across the two studies, the samples came from the exact same population. It is also important to note that, across the two studies, the measure of religiosity we used was identical. This suggests that the religious paradox (co-existence of prosocial and antisocial tendencies) is not necessarily a consequence of distinct religious dimensions. For instance, it is generally assumed that it is fundamentalists who show out-group prejudice, whereas nonfundamentalist religious people are prosocial (Hood, Hill, and Spilka 2009). However, recent work has shown that religious fundamentalists are not only antisocial (toward out-groups), but also prosocial (toward in-groups) (Blogowska and Saroglou 2011). Extending that line of research by focusing on mere personal religiosity, the present work suggests that the religious paradox can be identified at the heart of religion rather than only in its margins (fundamentalism)."
Religious prosociality and aggression: It's real, J Blogowska, C Lambert… - Journal for the Scientific …, 2013 - Wiley Online Library
“1. To rise with Christ, we must die with Christ: we must "be away from the body and at home with the Lord" ( 2 Cor 5,8).
CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH. Education For resurgendum cum Christo about the burial of the dead and the preservation of the ashes in case of cremation
The Catholic CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH edicts authroised by the Pope determines religion seeking to control human action-behaviour not by ‘Transcendence’ to a space above humanity involving “openness” to all perspectives, in fact necessarily falling back on Plato’s ideal forms rehashed of mere control restriction of what humanity may define as “truth, beauty, goodness and unity” in the human sphere of actions-behaviours based as it must on what the actual catholic codex determines-necessarily analogises as universal-ultimate “truth, beauty, goodness and unity”. What is this utilisation of actual catholic codex-scripture result in a ‘transcendence’ to an absolute which surely must be so obvious once found as to the ‘truth’ there will be no dispute between humankind as to its veracity?
“[The Church] cannot … condone attitudes or permit rites that involve erroneous ideas about death, such as considering death as the definitive annihilation of the person, or the moment of fusion with Mother Nature or the universe, or as a stage in the cycle of regeneration, or as the definitive liberation from the ‘prison’ of the body,” it argues.
It goes on: “In order that every appearance of pantheism, naturalism or nihilism be avoided, it is not permitted to scatter the ashes of the faithful departed in the air, on land, at sea or in some other way, nor may they be preserved in mementos, pieces of jewellery or other objects.”
It then adds that if someone has asked for their ashes to be scattered “for reasons contrary to the Christian faith" then "a Christian funeral must be denied to that person".
Catholic Church bans scattering of ashes as 'pantheism', The Telegraph, John Bingham, Nick Squires, 25 OCTOBER 2016
The “truth, beauty, goodness and unity” in the case of the ashes of the deceased and even the act itself subject to actual catholic scriptural-textual-historical cultural method regards human actions-behaviours, terrorism is an action-behaviour which is justified utilising the exact same methodology of cultural reflection, there is nothing transcendent above human forms, the cultural decisions as to what “truth, beauty, goodness and unity” are embedded as logic-rational thought must dictate. if sanity not delusion reigns. in the specific earth-bound human cultural codex of ‘truth’ not an unprovable non-existent pretend ideal-forms fantasyland utilised to deflect culpability for earthly outcomes.
Where has this obscene paradigm originated which forces the secular-minded to accept such self-serving popery interpretation of the religious affect upon humanity or any cultural force for that matter, it is the sociology of the deluded 'sociological imagination' the constraint of empiricism, utilisation of method and theory deemed impediments to the true sociology “intellectual craftsman", precepts of 'natural science' and methods determined as limiting the sociological realm to mere symptoms. It has led us to utilise in consequence dangerous method, theory abstractions where to challenge such human made constructs empirically with evidence represents bigotry, prejudice, Right wing, populists, stereotyping rather than evidence these ‘imagined’ human relationship constructs such as multiculturalism, religion, etc may contain tragic consequences for humanity and therefore must be dealt with accordingly.
Citizens ethics-values-beliefs diametrically opposed with the elites sociologically imagined abstractions determined as 'populist', underlying the fact these citizens are not an insignificant minority in fact can be and are in some cases the majority of the citizenry, determined as having the 'plague' infected by and infecting others with the disease of ‘evil’ ideas, thoughts, motivations.
"The Vatican announced that 27 new members will join the Congregation for Divine Worship (CDW) and the Discipline of the Sacraments, led by Cardinal Robert Sarah. These appointments will most likely have a direct influence on decisions concerning all aspects of the liturgy of the Church.
The CDW under Cardinal Sarah, one of the most fearless prelates in the Church, has published advisories of major importance in the recent past to safeguard the Roman liturgy and combat liturgical abuses. Many Catholic observers fear this “conservative” line will now come to an end."
Pope Francis again elevates Church progressives in complete overhaul of Vatican liturgy office, Jan Bentz, Lifesite, Wed Nov 2, 2016
The struggle for defining "truth, beauty, goodness and unity" happens exclusively in the human realm, to claim otherwise is "idolatry", a worthless transcendent exercise in delusion, hypocrisy, whilst utilising human political manipulation to define your 'vision' of "truth, beauty, goodness and unity" within the existent bounds of human derived cultural codex and exemplar behavior inference, metaphors, analogy controlled-imposed by the cultural clique holding the reigns-families-communities-institutions and whip-altruistic enforcers.
How the adherent horse behavioral variance will respond dependent upon a combination of system strength required relative to how transparent is authorisation-justification of the cultural codex and exemplary behavior to "truth, beauty, goodness and unity". Clearly the Catholic version of this transcendent "openness" excludes women, Catholic hierarchy and codex and as well in some cases exemplar behavior, as with many other religions, "truth, beauty, goodness and unity" denies the equality of women to man and therefore sets the framework for the continuing erroneous subjugation of women to Mans leadership, abuse and the reason controlled sexuality.
Religion is a moral framework developed to justify and authorise worldly moral decisions based upon the moral bounds set by religious texts and exemplar behaviour to claim otherwise is pure deception, deceit.
"..study investigated the influence of individual differences in religious thoughts and feelings, social desirability and mood on emotions and decisions in moral dilemmas that pit social welfare against harming another person. In order to increase emotional salience, moral dilemmas were framed as personal choices. Results indicated that the tendency to seek religious guidance in everyday life, and social desirability positively predicted deontological choices (i.e., refusing to harm one person in order to save several people). In addition, individual differences in religious feelings positively predicted negative emotion presence in these moral dilemmas. These results highlight the motivational and emotional dimensions of religiosity that influence moral choice and emotional experience in moral dilemmas."
Religiosity enhances emotion and deontological choice in moral dilemmas, Raluca D. Szekely, Adrian Opre, Andrei C. Miu, 2015
"Religious prosociality and aggression are real, concern distinct kinds of targets, and are at the heart of personal religiosity.
...
Taken together, the two studies suggest that “loving your neighbor” and “hating the sinner” are two attitudes that coexist among religious people and translate into behavior. Religiosity implies both real prosocial behavior toward in-group members in need and real aggressive behavior toward people who threaten religious moral values. The two sides of religion seem to coexist within the same people: across the two studies, the samples came from the exact same population. It is also important to note that, across the two studies, the measure of religiosity we used was identical. This suggests that the religious paradox (co-existence of prosocial and antisocial tendencies) is not necessarily a consequence of distinct religious dimensions. For instance, it is generally assumed that it is fundamentalists who show out-group prejudice, whereas nonfundamentalist religious people are prosocial (Hood, Hill, and Spilka 2009). However, recent work has shown that religious fundamentalists are not only antisocial (toward out-groups), but also prosocial (toward in-groups) (Blogowska and Saroglou 2011). Extending that line of research by focusing on mere personal religiosity, the present work suggests that the religious paradox can be identified at the heart of religion rather than only in its margins (fundamentalism)."
Religious prosociality and aggression: It's real, J Blogowska, C Lambert… - Journal for the Scientific …, 2013 - Wiley Online Library
“1. To rise with Christ, we must die with Christ: we must "be away from the body and at home with the Lord" ( 2 Cor 5,8).
CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH. Education For resurgendum cum Christo about the burial of the dead and the preservation of the ashes in case of cremation
The Catholic CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH edicts authroised by the Pope determines religion seeking to control human action-behaviour not by ‘Transcendence’ to a space above humanity involving “openness” to all perspectives, in fact necessarily falling back on Plato’s ideal forms rehashed of mere control restriction of what humanity may define as “truth, beauty, goodness and unity” in the human sphere of actions-behaviours based as it must on what the actual catholic codex determines-necessarily analogises as universal-ultimate “truth, beauty, goodness and unity”. What is this utilisation of actual catholic codex-scripture result in a ‘transcendence’ to an absolute which surely must be so obvious once found as to the ‘truth’ there will be no dispute between humankind as to its veracity?
“[The Church] cannot … condone attitudes or permit rites that involve erroneous ideas about death, such as considering death as the definitive annihilation of the person, or the moment of fusion with Mother Nature or the universe, or as a stage in the cycle of regeneration, or as the definitive liberation from the ‘prison’ of the body,” it argues.
It goes on: “In order that every appearance of pantheism, naturalism or nihilism be avoided, it is not permitted to scatter the ashes of the faithful departed in the air, on land, at sea or in some other way, nor may they be preserved in mementos, pieces of jewellery or other objects.”
It then adds that if someone has asked for their ashes to be scattered “for reasons contrary to the Christian faith" then "a Christian funeral must be denied to that person".
Catholic Church bans scattering of ashes as 'pantheism', The Telegraph, John Bingham, Nick Squires, 25 OCTOBER 2016
The “truth, beauty, goodness and unity” in the case of the ashes of the deceased and even the act itself subject to actual catholic scriptural-textual-historical cultural method regards human actions-behaviours, terrorism is an action-behaviour which is justified utilising the exact same methodology of cultural reflection, there is nothing transcendent above human forms, the cultural decisions as to what “truth, beauty, goodness and unity” are embedded as logic-rational thought must dictate. if sanity not delusion reigns. in the specific earth-bound human cultural codex of ‘truth’ not an unprovable non-existent pretend ideal-forms fantasyland utilised to deflect culpability for earthly outcomes.
Where has this obscene paradigm originated which forces the secular-minded to accept such self-serving popery interpretation of the religious affect upon humanity or any cultural force for that matter, it is the sociology of the deluded 'sociological imagination' the constraint of empiricism, utilisation of method and theory deemed impediments to the true sociology “intellectual craftsman", precepts of 'natural science' and methods determined as limiting the sociological realm to mere symptoms. It has led us to utilise in consequence dangerous method, theory abstractions where to challenge such human made constructs empirically with evidence represents bigotry, prejudice, Right wing, populists, stereotyping rather than evidence these ‘imagined’ human relationship constructs such as multiculturalism, religion, etc may contain tragic consequences for humanity and therefore must be dealt with accordingly.
Citizens ethics-values-beliefs diametrically opposed with the elites sociologically imagined abstractions determined as 'populist', underlying the fact these citizens are not an insignificant minority in fact can be and are in some cases the majority of the citizenry, determined as having the 'plague' infected by and infecting others with the disease of ‘evil’ ideas, thoughts, motivations.
The reality is the political-social elite seeking to impose homogenous ethics-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology by forcing diametrically opposed local-world views upon their citizens is achieving nothing but increasing social hostility broken bodies and lives in humanities streets as such a process must. It is being demanded of citizens to ‘grow in confidence’ with the terror-genocide inherent in such dangerous policy.
This dangerous policy is being increasingly managed by the developing Bentham security-political-social Panopticon where citizens are via increasing sophistication of technology, data-information-knowledge techniques and research insights from social psychology are being assigned to ‘thought-expected behaviour’ cells utilising classical demonising as a deviance labelling technique to assign ‘plague’ status along with perceived relative threat, employing state terror tactics to intimidate selected ‘populist’ diseased to create fear of effectively challenging the State-Panopticon. Foucault has left a warning for these diligent efficient magistrates-inspectors-directors-physicians-pathologists-supporting minions:
”… In any case, enclosed as he is in the middle of this architectural mechanism, is not the directors own fate entirely bound up with it? The incompetent physician who is allowed contagion to spread, the incompetent prison governor or workshop manager will be the first victims of an epidemic or a revolt. ‘ “By every tie I could devise”, said the master of the Panoptican , “my own fate has been bound up by me with theirs’”
DISCIPLINE AND PUNISH, PANOPTICISM, Foucault, Michel. In Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Original Publication: Surveiller et Punir, 1975
and a warning to those citizens 'populists, 'blasphemers',' right wing', 'bigots', 'racists' ,...subject to such a device:
“thanks to its (Panoptican) mechanisms of observation, it gains in efficiency and in the ability to penetrate into men’s behaviour; knowledge follows the advances of power, discovering new objects of knowledge of all the services on which power is exercised.”
DISCIPLINE AND PUNISH, PANOPTICISM, Foucault, Michel. In Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Original Publication: Surveiller et Punir, 1975
The warning for citizens is the greater the efficiency of the Panoptican’s mechanisms of observation, identity assignment, and infliction of punishment the greater the propensity of the system to impose its template of "ideal functioning". The very perceived need of such a device in any society is the mark of a society which has failed it’s citizenry not saved the citizens from the plague but in fact is the plague. For as in the seventh century the plague was to wear itself out upon the citizens as the Panopticon managed and enforced citizens incarceration with death but whereas in the seventh century there was no understanding of the actual cause of the plague in the twenty-first century humanity know why, not only why the plague is occurring but also who are forcing citizens to coexist in the same space so as to be subject to continuing terror-genocide and destruction of their culture via continuing violence to form a sociologically imagined 'homogeneous' society where definitions of liberty, equality, feminism, ... are all altered to conform to a kafkaesque madness which no longer represents their previous nature-purpose.
Such a system as it increases its diligence and efficiency confining citizens to ever increasing categories and degrees of deviancy will in time increasingly create the 'lone-wolf’ determined erroneously as marginalised, mentally deficient, uneducated, easily led, … not representing the codex ‘true’ faith. Erroneously represented because anyone can be so determined, for who is not marginalised to some degree, who is a perfect psychological specimen, who can be determined as fully cognisant of all the knowledge there is to be had to make ‘correct’ decisions, who is not led by cultural-peer group pressure to determine a straight line to be crooked; also pertinently if a cultural codex text is so riven with codex constructs so easily able to be misconstrued, so often mere statistics let alone common-sense would determine claims of cultural ‘innocence’ diminished with each new victim – yet the reverse is occurring. Evidence of a cultures inherent danger to humanity broken in our streets determined as ‘bigotry’ equaling scientific method sacrificed to reverse bigotry and worse dangerous delusion as by such logic rational the explicit terror-genocide continues until the 'tranquility of silence' is achieved and implicit inculcated terror in each citizen takes its place.
The ‘lone-wolf’ represented as success as opposed to developed mass attacks as the road to eventual elimination of threat, but in fact inevitable outcome along the path to continuing failure,-tragedy from the perspective of the victims for the plague persists. For it simply represents change in cultural tactics not strategy where citizens will not trust fellow citizens, adherents will not trust fellow adherents because each realise the Modernity Elizabethan-Panopticon elite managers understand the disease lies within the panopticon as well as the watched cells, the eyes and ears of the elites henchmen-inclusive of likeminded citizens need to be woven throughout the societal fabric and they will.
"The head of national police earlier this week told his staff to respect those rules and announced an inquiry to establish who was flouting them. Protesters have ignored his warnings and similar appeals from the government."
French police defy government in growing protest movement over lawlessness, FRance24 2016-10-21
This is the world the ‘sociological imagination’ has led us, where the ‘good’ will increasingly inform such evil against the populist-citizen each new atrocity as we see with the Muslim culture the Elizabethan-Panopticon will necessarily replicate and become as one, will astonish. Where the Quran with its poetry of death for individual and Other cultural liberty, equality,... becomes exclusive beutiful eloquence as the halls of power become riddled with its adherents-precepts advocating their alegencie to the existing dominant culture, possibly even believing they were, but inexhorably destroying Other from within and without. We continueally see across history employing the adherents of a codex which explictly-implictly insists upon your doom in positions of security-military-political power is really a very dangerous thing to do. Calls by Western security heads of the Muslim Elizabethan-Panopticon that blasphemy necessarily must exist as a societal method will determine the process well on its way to be entrenched as a norm.
"Frau Meierhofer explained in her letter that the complaints from locals were accumulating and that they were not from the far-right or other extremist groups. "They are expressing their trials and tribulations to us", she writes.
"Massive problems with refugees in Garmisch-Partenkirchen," wrote the local Merkur newspaper which obtained the letter the mayor wrote.
A local official was outraged that the letter, and the deputy police chief, identified black Africans for causing the trouble in town, saying such "stereotyping" was unacceptable.
But the mayor's office insisted she was telling it like it is, not as bureaucrats elsewhere would like it to be."
‘Soon this town will explode’ German mayor says refugees putting future at risk, By ALLAN HALL, EXPRESS, Sun, Oct 16, 2016
"AS Saturday night’s appalling violence in the city showed again, the influx of refugees from Sudan and Somalia in recent years is presenting fresh challenges daily.
We’re seeing some frightening consequences.
While many young African-born people have settled into our way of life, making a go of it at school, university and work, a growing minority of angry young men are turning to binge drinking and crime gangs..
As a society, we need to tackle this issue before things get worse but some say it might be too late."
We must tackle the growing violence among young African refugees and not abandon them
LES TWENTYMAN, Herald Sun, March 14, 2016
'Sociological imagination' has led us tragically, ironically to the reverse of what 'sociological imagination' was claimed to would lead to cause rather than symptoms. For instance cultural derived terror-genocide as being disconnected from cultural cause the cultures ‘many’ cultural codex construct of Other and associated infant-child-adolescent-adult development process systemically informing the ‘few’ from the many families, communities and institutions.
'Sociological imagination' determines specifically identifying refugee African-born people clearly informing criminal activity as a cultural group is stereotyping, when in fact the evidence clearly shows increasingly refugee African-born people or their children are as we see in Melbourne Australia increasingly informing violent behavior against citizens, even terrorising citizens in their homes. Not identifying the actual source of threat to humanity determining it is a generic behavior across all cultures in a society is blatantly dishonest and seeks to prevent the supporters of 'sociological fantasy' from being held accountable for their complicity in informing social schism violence, crime and even terror in humanities streets. It is clear not all become involved in such activities but are we to increase intake of such refugees to increasingly inform more of the same? Would any culture in Africa finding themselves subject to proven imported cultural sourced violence want to import more? To do so is this rational or pathological rationalism? So what not all are involved, enough are to cause violence and crime to escalate.
'Sociological imagination' has invented fantasy worlds such as multiculturalism working phenomenally in ‘sociological imagination’ abstraction, yet in reality historically and even now before us delivering burning buildings, broken bodies and lives, development of cultural enclaving and terror in both directions, along with defensive-offensive mechanisms of deviance labelling and even defining of challenge to such ‘imaginations’ as criminal behaviour, punishable under a blasphemy paradigm not only for objecting against the actual heinous acts themselves but the very ‘imagined’ constructs such as ‘not-religion’ which allow the horrific cultural behaviour to continue and escalate.
There is no doubt most of humanity wish all cultures could live in peace and harmony, but the harsh reality is it is simply not possible as long as significant ethic-morals-values-motivation and methodology exist between cultures which cannot be rationally negotiated away without violence-terror being the final arbitrator. Not to adjust security-political-social policy to reflect this saddening reality is dangerous wishful thinking.
"..the correlation between marginalization or lack of integration and radicalization are not as robust as is commonly assumed (see Rahimi and Graumans 2015)..
We are hearing and giving more credence to the revolutionary, as opposed to the nihilistic, nature of the claims being made. The revolution in question, moreover, is one which fuses the interests of the person and their personal story with the larger cause and movement. ..
At the core of this difference in interpretational orientation, and hence explanation for what is happening, is our more forthright approach to the intensely religious discourse of the foreign fighters, and the ways they use religious ideas to comprehensively frame their experiences."
Talking to Foreign Fighters: Socio-Economic Push versus Existential Pull Factors, Lorne L. Dawson, Amarnath Amarasingam, and Alexandra Bain, July 2016
The underwriting ethical-moral-belief force for Islamic terror-genocide 'divine vengeance' against Other-out-groups (even fellow Muslims) determines 'Not religion' is a grotesque lie.
"..Killing them all is a holy act."
MUSLIMS CELEBRATE LONDON BOMBING AND 'HAPPY' AFTER 9/11 ATTACK.
holy : 'dedicated or consecrated to God or a religious purpose; sacred.'
act : 'behave in the way specified.'
specified : clearly and explicitly stated;
Mohammed Quran:
"006.049 But those who reject our signs,- them shall punishment touch, for that they ceased not from transgressing.
008,012 Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them.
003.028 Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from God…
003.004 Then those who reject Faith in the Signs of God will suffer the severest penalty, and God is Exalted in Might, Lord of Retribution."
"Without the ceaseless pulsating heartbeat of our "categorization engine, we would understand nothing around us, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action.
....
"every culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic labels that come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and entities"
SURFACES AND ESSENCES, ANALOGY AS THE FUEL AND FIRE OF THINKING, Douglass Hofstadter, Emmanuel Sander, 2013
"But despite all these efforts, Afghanistan remains highly volatile, with a weak central government and various insurgency groups that maintain considerable influence in the country. Many of these groups have a long history of working with Tehran or Riyadh and sometimes both. Although both capitals fund Islamic centers and various groups in Afghanistan, their respective strategies for the region diverge considerably."
Saudi Arabia and Iran Face Off in Afghanistan. The Threat of a Proxy War, By Ariane M. Tabatabai, Foreign Affairs, October 5, 2016
"Enough is enough. It is time to speak out.
“Islam is innocent” is an incomplete sentence. Introspection is needed, for, if we shy away from reality, the alternative will be more images like those we witnessed last Tuesday night, when brave Lt. Muath Al Kasasbeh was burnt to death in a cage.
The inconvenient truth that is overlooked or willfully ignored by apologists for the indefensible is the fact that Wahabism, the cult of mediaeval austerity founded by Ibn Abdul Wahab (1703-1792), has over the last half century been exported to every mosque and school throughout the Muslim world until it completely enveloped mainstream Sunni Islamic teachings.
Wahabism has entirely replaced, and become, Sunni Islam; the two cannot be told apart anymore. Some Wahabist teachings, which have permeated the air we breathe in the Muslim world, are simply irreconcilable with decent human values, especially the ones that declare that every non-Wahabist is a disposable body whose bloodletting is unproblematic."
‘We have a problem’ by Zaid Nabulsi The Jordan Times Feb 10, 2015
"The time has come for us to be honest with ourselves and indeed each other. The radicalisation that breeds terrorism is not conducted in the bush at night. It occurs in the full glare of day in homes, in madrasas and in mosques with rogue imams. We must ask the question — where are the parents and families of those who are being radicalized?" said Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenya's president "Our task of countering terrorism has been made all the more difficult by the fact that the planners and financiers of this brutality are deeply embedded in our communities."
by EDITH HONAN GARISSA, Kenya — Reuters Published Sunday, Apr. 05 2015
"Intellectuals from Saudi Arabia and Jordan to Egypt and Morocco are slamming Muslim leaders and clerics for ignoring the problems of Muslim society and dismissing terror attacks with faulty platitudes such as the oft-repeated, “Not in Islam’s name.”
Another Saudi journalist, Muhammad Aal Al-Sheikh, argues in the daily Al-Jazirah that groups like IS are a faithful representation of Islamic texts that are no longer relevant today and for that reason Muslim law urgently needs updating.
“We cannot dismiss their actions by saying that they ‘do not represent Islam’ when most of their actions originate in books from our past heritage, [books] that dealt with matters of the day in accordance with the conditions and norms of that period, which are different from the conditions and norms of our own period,” he writes.
Writing that global Islam is mired in a “culture of ignorance, backwardness, and violence,” and that the “Arab world is rife with tyranny, poverty, death,” Al-Sheikh called for a “historic reconciliation between Islamic heritage and modern democracy.”"
Muslim Writers: Islam To Blame For Global Terror by DEBORAH DANAN, 30 Jul 2016
"The research, compiled through leaked ISIS materials, also determined that a large percentage of those aspiring to become suicide bombers ranked among the more educated.
“These individuals are far from being uneducated or illiterate,” the report says. “Most claim to have attended secondary school and a large fraction have gone on to study at university.”"
Report: Foreign ISIS Recruits Likely to Be Well-Educated, Relatively Wealthy, ‘Poverty is not a driver of radicalization’, Natalie Johnson, The Washington Free Beacon, October 6, 2016
Cognitive research into knowledge acquisition, categories, definitions, .... when simply reflecting upon the few words above of many linked together determining Other destined for 'grievous harm' and 'severest penalty' in the Islamic/Muslim religious text the Quran, let alone those derived from it, have to result in what? This is a religious text informing terror against Other therefore religion is responsible, to claim it is not determines nothing else in the Quran and reflected text can be determined religious. Please provide a rational argument if you disagree.
"'Religion and Violence. Paradoxes of Religious Communication' argues that violence in religious systems is present in at least three forms: It is inherent to communication with the ‘‘sacred,’’ it is generated by processes of inclusion and exclusion, shaping religiously interpreted lifeworlds, and it is motivated or moderated by the respective semantics of religious narratives. The paper concludes that violence as a moment of hierophany is constitutive for the living experience in religious systems and cannot be eliminated entirely by moderating semantics."
"But despite all these efforts, Afghanistan remains highly volatile, with a weak central government and various insurgency groups that maintain considerable influence in the country. Many of these groups have a long history of working with Tehran or Riyadh and sometimes both. Although both capitals fund Islamic centers and various groups in Afghanistan, their respective strategies for the region diverge considerably."
Saudi Arabia and Iran Face Off in Afghanistan. The Threat of a Proxy War, By Ariane M. Tabatabai, Foreign Affairs, October 5, 2016
"Enough is enough. It is time to speak out.
“Islam is innocent” is an incomplete sentence. Introspection is needed, for, if we shy away from reality, the alternative will be more images like those we witnessed last Tuesday night, when brave Lt. Muath Al Kasasbeh was burnt to death in a cage.
The inconvenient truth that is overlooked or willfully ignored by apologists for the indefensible is the fact that Wahabism, the cult of mediaeval austerity founded by Ibn Abdul Wahab (1703-1792), has over the last half century been exported to every mosque and school throughout the Muslim world until it completely enveloped mainstream Sunni Islamic teachings.
Wahabism has entirely replaced, and become, Sunni Islam; the two cannot be told apart anymore. Some Wahabist teachings, which have permeated the air we breathe in the Muslim world, are simply irreconcilable with decent human values, especially the ones that declare that every non-Wahabist is a disposable body whose bloodletting is unproblematic."
‘We have a problem’ by Zaid Nabulsi The Jordan Times Feb 10, 2015
"The time has come for us to be honest with ourselves and indeed each other. The radicalisation that breeds terrorism is not conducted in the bush at night. It occurs in the full glare of day in homes, in madrasas and in mosques with rogue imams. We must ask the question — where are the parents and families of those who are being radicalized?" said Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenya's president "Our task of countering terrorism has been made all the more difficult by the fact that the planners and financiers of this brutality are deeply embedded in our communities."
by EDITH HONAN GARISSA, Kenya — Reuters Published Sunday, Apr. 05 2015
"Intellectuals from Saudi Arabia and Jordan to Egypt and Morocco are slamming Muslim leaders and clerics for ignoring the problems of Muslim society and dismissing terror attacks with faulty platitudes such as the oft-repeated, “Not in Islam’s name.”
Another Saudi journalist, Muhammad Aal Al-Sheikh, argues in the daily Al-Jazirah that groups like IS are a faithful representation of Islamic texts that are no longer relevant today and for that reason Muslim law urgently needs updating.
“We cannot dismiss their actions by saying that they ‘do not represent Islam’ when most of their actions originate in books from our past heritage, [books] that dealt with matters of the day in accordance with the conditions and norms of that period, which are different from the conditions and norms of our own period,” he writes.
Writing that global Islam is mired in a “culture of ignorance, backwardness, and violence,” and that the “Arab world is rife with tyranny, poverty, death,” Al-Sheikh called for a “historic reconciliation between Islamic heritage and modern democracy.”"
Muslim Writers: Islam To Blame For Global Terror by DEBORAH DANAN, 30 Jul 2016
"The research, compiled through leaked ISIS materials, also determined that a large percentage of those aspiring to become suicide bombers ranked among the more educated.
“These individuals are far from being uneducated or illiterate,” the report says. “Most claim to have attended secondary school and a large fraction have gone on to study at university.”"
Report: Foreign ISIS Recruits Likely to Be Well-Educated, Relatively Wealthy, ‘Poverty is not a driver of radicalization’, Natalie Johnson, The Washington Free Beacon, October 6, 2016
Cognitive research into knowledge acquisition, categories, definitions, .... when simply reflecting upon the few words above of many linked together determining Other destined for 'grievous harm' and 'severest penalty' in the Islamic/Muslim religious text the Quran, let alone those derived from it, have to result in what? This is a religious text informing terror against Other therefore religion is responsible, to claim it is not determines nothing else in the Quran and reflected text can be determined religious. Please provide a rational argument if you disagree.
"'Religion and Violence. Paradoxes of Religious Communication' argues that violence in religious systems is present in at least three forms: It is inherent to communication with the ‘‘sacred,’’ it is generated by processes of inclusion and exclusion, shaping religiously interpreted lifeworlds, and it is motivated or moderated by the respective semantics of religious narratives. The paper concludes that violence as a moment of hierophany is constitutive for the living experience in religious systems and cannot be eliminated entirely by moderating semantics."
"Baron and Spranca 1997; Fiske and Tetlock 2002; Tetlock 2003) suggests that people resist attempts to compromise sacred values no matter the cost to themselves or others. In the last decade or so, experimental work that goes beyond the morality of fairness and harm suggests that religious and transcendental beliefs consolidate “community” (Rozin et al. 1999), lead to “binding” (Graham et al. 2011), provide “unity motivation” (Ray and Fiske 2011), and mobilize parochial altruists, such as suicide bombers, to give their lives for the group (Ginges, Hansen, and Norenzayan 2009; cf. Atran 2003). .......
Sacred values are nonnegotiable preferences whose defense compels actions beyond evident reason, that is, regardless of calculable costs and consequences (Ginges et al. 2007). Identity fusion occurs when personal and group identities collapse into a unique identity to generate a collective sense of invincibility and special destiny (Swann et al. 2012). These two programs account for different aspects of intractable intergroup conflicts; however, here and in a companion article (Sheikh, Gómez, and Atran 2016), we argue that sacred values and identity fusion interact to produce willingness to make costly sacrifices for a primary reference groups even unto death, that is, sacrificing the totality of self-interests."
The Devoted Actor, Unconditional Commitment and Intractable Conflict across Cultures, by Scott Atran Current Anthropology Volume 57, Supplement 13, June 2016
“Tehran had heavily criticised the Sunni-ruled kingdom, with Iran's supreme leader saying Saudi politicians will face 'divine vengeance' (Retribution) over the killing of Nimr al Nimr.”
Saudi Arabia cuts ties with Iran Monday, 4 January 2016
Vengeance: "The action or an act of avenging oneself or another; infliction of injury or punishment in retribution for wrong to oneself or another. With great force or violence; in an extreme degree."
"003.004 Then those who reject (nonbelievers Other-out-groups) Faith in the Signs of God will suffer the severest penalty, and God is Exalted in Might, Lord of Retribution." Quran
"Divine grace is a theological term present in many religions. It has been defined as the divine influence which operates in humans to regenerate and sanctify, to inspire virtuous impulses, and to impart strength to endure trial and resist temptation;[1] and as an individual virtue or excellence of divine origin.[2]" From Wikipedia
'Divine vengeance' logically; rational critical thinking informs humanity, is therefore a theological term present in many religions. It has been defined as the divine influence which operates in humans to regenerate and sanctify, to inspire violent impulses, and to impart strength to inform destruction and murder against Other-out-groups (inclusive of fellow Muslims) and resistance to Other-out-groups pleas for mercy and cessation of such evil; and as an individual virtue or excellence of divine origin.
As religions divine grace, love informs human behavioral outcomes religions divine vengeance must therefore inform human behavioral outcomes.
Yet one is determined a religion of the divine as qualified and the other is illogically determined by some as 'not religion' of the divine as qualified even though all determine human behavioral motivation to act. Divine Grace, Love and Vengeance all determined as being of the other for to be 'good, just and pious' a Muslim adherent has to, has to align to the Islamic/Muslim categorisation engine (definitions) of what it means to be 'good, just and pious' 'through the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex scriptures and the prophets.'.
"Divine Love” God’s love is manifest in beings brought into existence, whether believer or disbeliever (the Quran itself determines from its very first pages the Islamic God's view of Other-outgroups is not one of Divine love but of violent Divine Retribution. Why do you think terror-genocide emanates systemically from the Islamic/Muslim culture?), to enjoy life, if only for a brief moment. It is also realized in the creation of paradise for those who choose righteousness over evil. God states in the final revelation that He loves those who do good (Quran 5:13), those who are just (Quran 5:42), those who are pious (Quran 9:4), those who are patient (Quran 3:146), those who put their trust in Him (Quran 3:159), those who frequently turn to Him in repentance and those who purify themselves (Quran 2:222). However, it is He (the Islamic/Muslim God) who has defined for human beings through the scriptures (codex text -Quran) and the prophets (exemplar (messianic) template behavior - Mohammed) what is good, just and pious. Consequently, those who follow the prophets are most beloved to God.
Why Did God Create? (part 3 of 3): Divine Love and Grace
"Consequently, those who follow the prophets are most beloved to God." The paragraph above commences with equality and finishes with inequality this has real life repercussions for Other-out-groups, the former claim being false and the later true, particularly as you will find out below how in 'Love' with nonbeliever Other the Islamic/Muslim God really is. The Islamic/Muslim God is as indicated in Islamic scripture above a God of Divine Retribution not of Divine Love regards nonbeliever Other-out-groups. By definition therefore a Muslim is 'good, just and pious' by following a God's scripture to wreak Divine Retribution against Other-out-groups simply for being a 'rejector' of the Islamic/Muslim 'faith'/religion.
Gods/Muslim adherents Divine Vengeance, as reality proves, does not even need fellow Muslims from their own in-group to have violence visited upon them to initiate Divine Retribution even silence is of no protection for Other-out-groups which is the usual theme in terror-genocide codex such as the Muslim and Nazi cultural codex.
''How futile it was to try to win over such people with argument, seeing that their very mouths distorted the truth, disowning the very words they had just used and adopting them again a few moments afterwards to serve their own ends in the argument!” Hitler's (Nazi exemplar (messianic) template) Mein Kampf
"002.006 As to those who reject Faith, it is the same to them whether thou warn them or do not warn them; they will not believe. 002.007 God hath set a seal on their hearts and on their hearing, and on their eyes is a veil; great is the penalty they (incur). 002:018 They are utterly deaf, dumb, and blind; they can no longer recover." Muhammad's (Muslim exemplar (messianic) template) Quran
Islamic State Issues Fatwa Against Children with Down Syndrome, Murders 38 Disabled Infants BREITBART by THOMAS D. WILLIAMS, PH.D.14 Dec 2015
"Action T4 (German: Aktion T4, pronounced [akˈtsi̯oːn teː fiːɐ]) was the postwar designation for a programme of forced euthanasia in wartime Nazi Germany. ... Those to be killed were identified as "all children under three years of age in whom any of the following 'serious hereditary diseases' were 'suspected': idiocy and Down syndrome...." From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
We see before us proof of what both the Nazi and Islamic/Muslim ideological constructs are able to analogise into reality from their respective codex, a codex to which the WHOLE culture determine as their ethical-moral-value-motivation and methodology sacred guide. To allow such constructs to be provided with State resources to flourish to produce the managers and perpetrators of such infamy straight from the ranks of the law-abiding 'moderate' many in both cultures behavioral variances is pure insanity.
So what the law-abiding moderate 'many' do not suffocate or inject the lethal dose personnaly clearly they inevitably supply the means and hands to carry out evil and are therefore culpable along with their codex. Not one child, not one is worth for a moment longer allowing such codex to remain in humanities public and private spheres.
"In his essay, The 'Ideograph:' A Link Between Rhetoric and Ideology, Michael Calvin McGee proposes that our system of beliefs is shaped through and expressed by words. We are consciously and unconsciously conditioned and controlled by the words we hear and use. Words carry ideology and convey and create meaning. Like Chinese characters, words are "ideographs" that "signify and 'contain' a unique ideological commitment," that is frequently unquestioned.' McGee also suggests that by understanding that a single word can carry ideology and that ideology can be expressed in a single word, we are better able to expose and evaluate ideology and choose to accept or reject such ideology. However, if we fail to recognize the ideographic nature of words, we risk creating and promoting a reality that is removed from our system of beliefs." - HOW WORDS CREATE REALITY, ANN SINSHEIMER 2009
'Words are dangerous weapons': New South Wales (Aust) Attorney-General Gabrielle Upton, 19 OCT 2015. Words combined with exemplar templates the actual source of those words which frame dangerous weapons (adherents behavior in perpetrating and supporting terror) are the responsibility of the culture which creates and sustains the 'few' from their 'moderate' law-abiding ranks systemically from generation to generation.
"David Irvine, has made similar remarks. AFP Commissioner Andrew Colvin recently did too, warning that “words matter’’ when Muslims feel “under siege”."
Source: ASIO chief’s call to Andrew Hastie has consequences for Malcolm Turnbull, Samantha Maiden, Sunday Herald Sun, December 20, 2015
"Without the ceaseless pulsating heartbeat of our "categorization engine, we would understand nothing around us, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action.
....
"every culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic labels that come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and entities"
SURFACES AND ESSENCES, ANALOGY AS THE FUEL AND FIRE OF THINKING, Douglass Hofstadter, Emmanuel Sander, 2013
Who then provides the "basis on which to take any action." the individual adherent or the cultural whole? Who sets the nature the methodology of how out-group boundaries will be managed, the nature of the 'many' and the 'few', and why, how, for what reason the 'few' step forward whilst the 'many' wash their hands, the individual adherent or the cultural whole.
Who therefore is ultimately responsible for enabling the existence of the 'few' the cultural whole who create and sustain the 'few', provide the 'few' with the "categorization engine" which informs terror, the cultural whole the 'many' plus the 'few' who utilise the exact same "categorization engine" or just the 'few'?
The obscene irony is, what is being tragically ignored are the “dangerous” “words” from the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex which form the Islamic/Muslim ‘categorization engine’ of Other causing the Islamic/Muslim terror-genocide to occur inevitably leads to a rational response, reactionary “words” against the Muslim cultures terror-genocide to which Other are subject. This rational response is being determined as ‘dangerous’ the ‘words’ which cause the rational response the Islamic/Muslim "word" construct of Other (out-groups) which are the direct cause of Muslim derived terror-genocide non-consequential.
The logic is this, the Islamic/Muslim cultural “words” clearly identifiable causing terror-genocide to occur do not matter-but those “words” against a culture delivering terror-genocide via the ‘few’ imbued with the “word” constructs of Other providing the motivation to commit terror-genocide by the development process infant-child-adolescent-adult of the non radicalised, ‘moderate’, law abiding ‘many’ families, communities and institutions are “dangerous”
“Instead of responding to attacks against freedom of expression, voices were raised to decry blasphemy and to propose compromise with terrorism. There is no blasphemy in a democracy,” Mr. Rushdie said. ..
..the writer decried the reluctance of Western governments to use the words “Muslim” or “Islam,” preferring instead to attribute terrorist attacks to “unbalanced” people or to a generic thing like “radicalism” or “extremism,” even when the attackers themselves say Islam is their motive."
‘Satanic Verses’ author Salman Rushdie: ‘Today, I would be accused of Islamophobia, racism’ By Victor Morton - The Washington Times - Tuesday, September 6, 2016
"“I think it behoves Australia and Australians to recognise that the backlash is something that is very, very dangerous. I don’t buy the notion that the issue of Islamic extremism is in some way fostered or sponsored or supported by the Muslim religion. I don’t buy that at all. I think it’s blasphemous to the extent that I can comment on someone else’s religion.’’ AUSTRALIA’S top spy chief Duncan Lewis has warned"
Source: Terror alert: Australia’s top spy chief warns rift with Muslims could weaken national security, Samantha Maiden, National Political Editor, The Sunday Telegraph, December 13, 2015
"Backlash" = Islamic 'provoked' state predicated upon accepting Islamic blasphemy paradigm as a normative value construct in a Western Democratic space and the terror-genocide which inevitably goes with it. This is what AUSTRALIA’S top spy chief Duncan Lewis and the one who unleashed him Malcolm Turnbull (Australian Prime Minister) wants to have in our Australian political space to crush dissent to achieve what an Iranian politician determines as the 'Tranquility of Silence'.
To confront the Islamic/Muslim culture regards their cultural codex text and exemplar (messianic) template behavior the actual foundation stones of Muslim terror-genocide determined as blasphemy.
Democracy cannot afford the return of the 'blasphemy' paradigm within our Western Liberal public and private spheres as an excuse for 'provocation' of a culture's terror-genocide against Other cultures and as an excuse for the failure of our inept dangerous cultural gatekeepers to keep their citizens safe. For as humanity now know with certainty as can be seen in the streets where this 'blasphemy' paradigm is applied via legislation in Pakistan and elsewhere the silent and the the noisy continue to be subject equally to Muslim terror-genocide.
AUSTRALIA’S top spy chief Duncan Lewis demanding the Islamic blasphemy paradigm be accepted in the Western Liberal Democratic space with the inevitable terror-genocide which comes with it because Duncan Lewis determines "I don’t buy the notion that the issue of Islamic extremism is in some way fostered or sponsored or supported by the Muslim religion." despite extensive social psychology and sociology research determining cultures religious and secular are responsible for the whole cultural behavioral variance inclusive of the 'few' which deliver terror-genocide not just the bit which supports your philosophical and or political view is a very dangerous approach for it leaves the very cause of terror-genocide the codex constructs unchallenged in public and private spheres to continue to inform new bloody piles of broken bodies.
True Democracy: The Right to misjudge and be misjudged, the Right to insult and be insulted, the Right to abuse and be abused....
This is a Theory not a Hypothesis: Nursery Rhymes on Cultures Knee - Western Version: Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me. Islamic Version: Words, images, body language will ‘provoke’ me to break your bones with swords and guns and I will certainly hurt you.
"Culture, of course, is related to violence in general and not only to structural violence. For example, culture influences the determination of "thresholds" which pressure on a person must overcome in order to move that person from being controllable, or even positive, to being negative (that is, into violence)." The Culture of Violence, Chp 3. On the relationship between violence and culture - Galtung's concept
Demanding any ideology-culture, be it religious or secular, which determines behavioral "thresholds" not the 'few' which the culture itself creates and sustains to deliver the behavior, be immune from judgment 'blasphemy" is an absurdity, as humans need to determine relative threat and benefit of entities around them and act accordingly, particularly when such an entity be it religious or otherwise by the cultures very own codex constructs imbue adherents with ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology via a development process which systemically inform infamy.
"Cognitive-social approaches are limited, however in two respects. They tend to emphasise the rational side of life and under-emphasise the emotional, motivational, and irrational. If personality is really reducible to cognitive process (Cantor, 1990) one would have difficulty accounting for the psychological abnormalities of a man like Adolf Hitler. Because Hitler was tremendously adept at getting people to follow him and had extraordinary sense of self-efficacy, one would have to rate him high on several dimensions of social intelligence. Yet his social motives, his ways of dealing with his emotions are clearly disturbed.
A related problem is the tendency to assume that people consciously know what they think, feel and want and hence can report it. Would most of us accept Hitler's self-report of his life task of bettering the world by creating a master race? Or would we suspect that his dream of world domination and his program of genocide reflected, thoughts, feelings and motivations that he could not easily have described?"
Psychology 3rd Australia and New Zealand Edition Burton, Westen, Kowalski, 2012
Muhammad (model exemplar) articulates the exact same genocide construct of Other as Hitler (model exemplar) with the inevitable atrocities and yet we see, hear no statements emanating from the Psychology intelligentsia asking the question 'Would most of us accept Muhammad's self-report of his life task of bettering the world by creating a master religious culture?"' utilising the same cultural justified and authorised methodology of terror, categories, rules, and scripts as the Nazi. "Or would we suspect that his dream of world domination and his program of genocide reflected, thoughts, feelings and motivations that he could not easily have described?"
It is because for most people it requires an extreme experience generating cathartic cognitive dissonance which one would not wish on any person yet for most unless they are in the same space as the terror-genocide unleashed it increases ones support for the very culture generating the terror and the very codex 'educating' the 'few' generation after generation to deliver terror-genocide. The same reaction can be found in intense physiological experiences which determines immediate development of future adverse reaction to the same event.
“I came to the absolute conviction that it is impossible…impossible…for any human being to read the biography of Mohammed and believe in it, and then emerge a psychologically and mentally healthy person.”
- Syrian Psychiatrist Dr. Wafa Sultan
"Her father was a grain trader and a devout Muslim, and she followed the faith's strictures into adulthood.
But, she said, her life changed in 1979 when she was a medical student at the University of Aleppo, in northern Syria. At that time, the radical Muslim Brotherhood was using terrorism to try to undermine the government of President Hafez al-Assad. Gunmen of the Muslim Brotherhood burst into a classroom at the university and killed her professor as she watched, she said.
"They shot hundreds of bullets into him, shouting, 'God is great!' " she said. "At that point, I lost my trust in their god and began to question all our teachings. It was the turning point of my life, and it has led me to this present point. I had to leave. I had to look for another god."
..... "Why does a young Muslim man, in the prime of life, with a full life ahead, go and blow himself up?" she asked. "In our countries, religion is the sole source of education and is the only spring from which that terrorist drank until his thirst was quenched.""
For Muslim Who Says Violence Destroys Islam, Violent Threats By JOHN M. BRODER The New York Times, March 11, 2006
What do both codex constructs of Other continue to create as they inevitably must in the revolutionary-genocide behavioral variance of the 'mostly' good:
'He wouldn't hurt a mouse', says mother of Tunisia gunman The Telegraph By Nicola Harley 12:58AM BST 05 Jul 2015
"Rezgui's family insist he was brainwashed into carrying out the attack, but have not named any group or individual.
"They got to my son. They used him and they framed him for the crime," his mother said."
Tunisia Massacre: Killer's Parents Defend Son Sky News 10 July 2015
Time particularly for social psychologists to be honest about how an individual human is enabled by culture and its constituent families, communities and institutions to be 'brainwashed', to point out the truth of the 'Parents' culpability in their child's crime which enabled the child to cross the culturally defined ethical bridge to terror and that all cultures behavioral variances do not pose the same threat to Other and therefore must be treated differently relative to the threat they pose to societies within which they exist.
Psychologists you have a better than 'good' idea why 'He wouldn't hurt a mouse' is true in one context and not another due to a cultures beliefs, categorisations, scripts get off your couches and start to protect humanity rather than enabling its destruction you twats.
Given the following constructs of Other are inherent within the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex (textual -Quran and exemplar (messniac) model - Mohammed) and it has been found exposure to violent constructs such as video games informs increased aggressive behavior Islamic/Muslim codex constructs of Other will not surprisingly lead to violence against Other?
"The research demonstrates a consistent relation between violent video game use and increases in aggressive behavior, aggressive cognitions and aggressive affect, and decreases in prosocial behavior, empathy and sensitivity to aggression," says the report of the APA Task Force on Violent Media. ...."
"No single risk factor consistently leads a person to act aggressively or violently," the report states. "Rather, it is the accumulation of risk factors that tends to lead to aggressive or violent behavior. The research reviewed here demonstrates that violent video game use is one such risk factor."
Link confirmed between playing violent video games, aggression
Date: August 13, 2015 Source: American Psychological Association
Could it be the other significant risk factors for aggressive emotions turning into aggressive terrorist behavior are a 'real' Other target, not vidio pretend targets, defined by culture, developed cultural psychotic persecution type delusion disorders framed by the cultures codex to trigger particularly young males 'frustration', cultural derived rewards mechanisms for altruistic enforcers spiritual and sexual nirvana, etc which unless removed from the cultural codex will generation to generation inform the same?
"An Islamic leader has expressed shock that two Muslim school teachers beat a 10-year-old boy with a stick for reciting the Koran incorrectly."
Shock expressed over Birmingham Koran boy beating 10 September 2015
Early and Middle Childhood
There is increasing recognition in policy, research, and clinical practice communities that early and middle childhood provide the physical, cognitive, and social-emotional foundation for lifelong health, learning, and well-being. Early childhood, middle childhood, and adolescence represent the 3 stages of child development. Each stage is organized around the primary tasks of development for that period.
Early childhood (usually defined as birth to year 8) is a time of tremendous physical, cognitive, and socio-emotional development.
Middle childhood (usually defined as ages 6 to 12) is a time when children develop skills for building healthy social relationships and learn roles that will lay groundwork for a lifetime.
Healthy People 2010 (Federal Government Web site managed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services)
"Muhammad Anwar, 15, was attending a sermon when the cleric asked if anyone present was not a true lover of the prophet. The boy misheard the question, and enthusiastically raised his hand, causing the others to accuse him of heresy, police chief Mehr Nausher Ahmad Kathia told dpa. He was told that he had joined enemies of the prophet by raising his hand, so he vowed to remove the hand, Kathia said."
Pakistan teen chops off own hand for blasphemy smh, January 16, 2016
Given the evidence and the methodology not only as to the construct of Other below the violence of conditioning, even without the violence with the threat thereof the appropriate response is obtained and this occurs even in "Birmingham England" 2015. Please explain to me psychologists why you are not standing up as one and telling the truth this is why the Muslim community as a whole are responsible for the 'few' via this determination the Quran and its clear genocide construct of Other as detailed below must be recited and understood until it is embedded in memory - which informs as you know subsequently drives ....?
Instead what happens after each inevitable atrocity delivered by such a political paradigm the 'good' stand on each new pile of broken bodies and the ocean of grief into which they sink shouting across at those who demand it stop "bigots, xenophobes, hateful ignorance, hysteria, trolls, respect, words, Islamophobes, LOVE!". The very supporters of the Islamic/Muslim culture and the adherents themselves, a culture which can be clearly proved to systemically be producing these bloody piles of lost dreams, aspirations, since the seventh century have the temerity to accuse those objecting as evil - it beggars belief.
My view is psychology should be
utilised to identify cultural evil and not hide evil behind a cultural
sensitive paradigm which enables such evil to flourish.
"Additional research suggests that negative information may more easily generalize to the outgroup (Paolini, Harwood, & Rubin, 2010). Our studies suggest that negative expectations prevent positive contact from leading to more favorable outgroup attitudes." Positive Expectations Encourage Generalization From a Positive Intergroup Interaction to Outgroup Attitudes, September 24, 2014, Matthew P. Deegan, Eric Hehman, Samuel L. Gaertner, and John F. Dovidio My view is there are particular cultures which inherently inform violent and oppressive psychotic behaviors driven by persecution type delusion disorders framed by the cultures codex as detailed below and quantified currently as 'normal' thinking, belief, behavior under a grotesque APA evaluative paradigm which specifically excludes culture derived thought, beliefs, behaviors however vile from being determined as a mental disorder. My view is you support either culture, the Nazi or the Islamic/Muslim, you support the terror and misogynistic oppression they deliver be you a psychologist, a clerk, a socialist, a liberal, a Buddhist, a Christian, a politician local, national, international …. because cultures via their codex as detailed below not the individual adherents define the reasons to justify the methodology utilized by the altruistic ‘few’ sourced from liberal-moderate families, groups and institutions to enforce the cultures ideas and beliefs regards Other and women. If you accept 'Words are dangerous weapons': New South Wales (Aust) Attorney-General Gabrielle Upton regards reacting to a cultures terror, calling the Islamic/Muslim culture to account and therefore determined as inciting "backlash" terror-genocide then explain how it is the following words are not "dangerous weapons" informing the initial Muslim terror-genocide and the very "backlash" itself. |
|
 |
 |
Hitler MEIN KAMPF=Nazi
|
Mohammed QURAN=Muslims
|
Other unable to be convinced of the error and evil of their
ways
|
|
"But a Jew can never be rescued
from his fixed notions."
''How futile
it was to try to win over such people with argument, seeing that their very mouths
distorted the truth, disowning the very words they had just used and adopting
them again a few moments afterwards to serve their own ends in the argument!”
|
002.006 As
to those who reject Faith, it is the same to them whether thou warn them or do
not warn them; they will not believe.
002.007 God hath set a seal on their hearts and on their hearing, and on their
eyes is a veil; great is the penalty they (incur).
002:018 They are utterly deaf, dumb, and blind; they can no longer recover. 003.118 O ye who believe! Take not into your intimacy those outside your ranks: They will not fail to corrupt you. They only desire your ruin: Rank hatred has already appeared from their mouths: What their hearts conceal is far worse. 003.119 ... When they meet you, they say, "We believe": But when they are alone, they bite off the very tips of their fingers at you in their rage. Say: "Perish in your rage;.. |
Exemplar Nazi (Hitler) & Muslim
(Mohammed) Cultural Authorisation for exclusion and murder of Other.
|
|
“In my opinion the most culpable ..
those who did not think it worth while .. placing his
seducer and corrupter against the wall.”
“The very first essential for success is a perpetually constant and regular employment of violence.” ― Adolf Hitler |
006.049 But those who reject our signs,-
them shall punishment touch, for that they ceased
not from transgressing.
008,012 Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them. 003.028 Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from God… 003.004 Then those who reject Faith in the Signs of God will suffer the severest penalty, and God is Exalted in Might, Lord of Retribution. 003.178 Let not the Unbelievers think that our respite to them is good for themselves: We grant them respite that they may grow in their iniquity: But they will have a shameful punishment. 003.147 All that they said was: "Our Lord! Forgive us our sins and anything We may have done that transgressed our duty: Establish our feet firmly, and help us against those that resist Faith." Quran (8:57) - "If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember." Etc, |
Nazi (Hitler) & Muslim (Mohammed)
Justification for subjugation and murder of Other: The Nazi & Muslim categorisation
of the nature of Other.
|
|
moral pestilence, poison, despoilers,
germ- carriers in poisoning human souls, shameful, fabricators, falsehood, cunning
and despicable, derogatory, evil, cold-blooded, thick-skinned and shameless, alien
race, evil spirits, absurdity of their teaching, obstinacy, tricks of logic, falsehoods,
evil counsellors, perfidy, etc.
|
“rejecters of Faith!”= unbelieving
women (idolaters), Unbelievers do (but) beckon you to the Fire, Deaf, dumb, and
blind, they are the fools, in utter darkness, deceive themselves, their hearts
is a disease, hangout with their evil ones, wander like blind ones, bartered Guidance
for error, lost true direction, in utter darkness, make mischief therein and shed
blood, transgressors, Be ye apes, despised and rejected., ignorant (fool)!, illiterates,
do nothing but conjecture, seek gain in evil, God's curse is on them for their
blasphemy, sold their souls, in insolent envy, wrong-doers, most greedy of life,
idolaters, perverse, blasphemers, buyers of (magic), they conceal, evil-doers,
in schism, wrong, wickedness,.. etc
|
Nazi (Hitler) & Muslim (Mohammed)
Authorization to lie as to the true intent of the Nazi Muslim final political
construct for Other and women within any time and political space.
|
|
“It is not truth that matters, but
victory.”
― Adolf Hitler
“If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed.”
― Adolf Hitler
“If you win, you need not have to explain...If you lose, you should not be there to explain!”
― Adolf Hitler
“By the skillful and sustained use of propaganda, one can make a people see even heaven as hell or an extremely wretched life as paradise.”
― Adolf Hitler
“Great liars are also great magicians.”
― Adolf Hitler
“Kill, Destroy, Sack, Tell lie; how
much you want after victory nobody asks why?”
― Adolf Hitler
“The settlement gave Germany the Sudetenland starting 10 October, and de facto control over the rest of Czechoslovakia as long as Hitler promised to go no further. On 30 September after some rest, Chamberlain went to Hitler and asked him to sign a peace treaty between the United Kingdom and Germany. After Hitler's interpreter translated it for him, he happily agreed.
On 30 September, upon his
return to Britain, Chamberlain delivered his infamous "peace for our time"
speech to crowds in London.”
Munich Agreement You accept as ‘truth’ words, treaties, assurances, from individuals from cultures such as the Nazi and the Islamic/Muslim cultures with their exact same construct of Other in time what is the price what has been the price? What must be able to be proved and shown for the sake of the security of any society: Under what logic do you believe this time for either culture in time and space in the end-game it will be any different? |
Lying (Taqiyya
and Kitman)
Qur'an (9:3) - "...Allah and His Messenger are free from liability to the idolaters..." From the Hadith:
Bukhari (52:269) - "The Prophet
said, 'War is deceit.'"
Muslims are allowed to lie to unbelievers in order to defeat them. The two forms are:
Taqiyya
- Saying something that isn't true.
"Khomeini nonetheless
reassured his liberal revolutionary compatriots — just months before the revolution,
while in Paris exile — that “women [would be] free in the Islamic Republic in
the selection of their activities and their future and their clothing.” Much to
its retrospective dismay, a sizable chunk of Iran’s liberal intelligentsia — both
male and female — lined up behind Khomeini, some even referring to him as an “Iranian
Gandhi.” Shortly after consolidating power, however, Khomeini and his disciples
swiftly moved to crush opposing views and curtail female social and sartorial
freedoms. “Islam doesn’t allow for people to [wear swimsuits] in the sea,” he
proclaimed shortly after becoming supreme leader. We “will skin their hide!”
Women who resisted the mandatory
veil were met with violence and intimidation, including lyrical taunts of “Ya
roosari, ya toosari!” (“Cover your head or be smacked in the head!”). As Iranian
Nobel Peace Prize laureate Shirin Ebadi recently wrote, “Although the 1979 revolution
in Iran is often called an Islamic revolution, it can actually be said to be a
revolution of men against women.… The drafters of [the Islamic Penal Code] had
effectively taken us back 1,400 years.”
The
Ayatollah Under the Bed(sheets) In the Islamic Republic of Iran, all politics
may not be sexual, but all sex is political. BY KARIM SADJADPOUR APRIL 23,
2012
Kitman -
Lying by omission. An example would be
when Muslim apologists quote only a fragment of verse 5:32 (that if anyone kills
"it shall be as if he had killed all mankind") while
neglecting to mention that the rest of the verse (and the next) mandate murder
in undefined cases of "corruption”, "mischief",
“legal retaliation”
given the construct of Other clearly this does not apply to Other also
this was an edict “prescribed for the Children of Israel”
clearly does not apply to Muslims but to "the Children of Israel"
There are clearly statements below which reveal the true nature of the Islamic codex where there is a clear delineation between the ‘unlawful’ death of Other determined as evil and a believer – clearly the ‘unlawful’ death of Other bares no relative condemnation nor inclusion within the quote below.
Sahih Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 83,
Number 3:
"Narrated 'Abdullah bin
'Umar: One of the evil deeds with bad consequence from which there is no
escape for the one who is involved in it is to kill someone unlawfully."
"The Holy Prophet said:
"The destruction of the entire world is lighter in the sight of Allah
than the unjust killing of a believer."
The following also reveals given the first pages definition of Other Allah does not determine Other as ‘sacred’ in fact evil and rightfully destined for ‘grievous harm’. Surah Isra 17:33:
"Nor take life - which Allah
has made sacred - except for just cause.”
Utilisation of any protection of Other really ignoring the qualifications and in fact out right exclusion under the classification of Other as a non-believer is a lie as the broken bodies and lives inform all the way from the seventh century. How many deaths do you want before it sinks in cultures via their cultural codex inclusive of the liberal-moderates produce the altruistic enforcers to manage the cultures Others borders as dictated by the very codex the liberal-moderates are avowed adherents of to inform death and destruction so prescribed. |
Genocide Outcomes Analogised from the
Nazi (Hitler) & Muslim (Mohammed) Cultural Codex Construct of Other.
Please note the following are only
a very small list of examples derived from each of the analogised genocide outcomes
from Nazi and Muslim culture codex.
|
|
|
“Jewish homes were ransacked, as were
shops, towns and villages, as SA stormtroopers and civilians destroyed buildings
with sledgehammers, leaving the streets covered in pieces of smashed windows—the
origin of the name "Night of Broken Glass." Ninety-one Jews were killed,
and 30,000 Jewish men—a quarter of all Jewish men in Germany—were taken to concentration
camps, where they were tortured for months, with over 1,000 of them dying. Around
1,668 synagogues were ransacked, and 267 set on fire. In Vienna alone 95 synagogues
or houses of prayer were destroyed.” etc
The Holocaust (also called Ha-Shoah in Hebrew)
refers to the period from January 30, 1933 - when Adolf Hitler became chancellor of Germany - to May 8, 1945, when the war in Europe
officially ended. During this time, Jews in Europe were subjected to progressively harsher
persecution that ultimately led to the murder of 6,000,000 Jews (1.5 million of these being children) and the
destruction of 5,000 Jewish communities. These deaths represented two-thirds of
European Jewry and one-third of all world Jewry.
The Jews who died were not casualties of the fighting
that ravaged Europe during World War II. Rather, they were the victims of Germany's
deliberate and systematic attempt to annihilate the entire Jewish population of
Europe, a plan Hitlercalled the “Final Solution” (Endlosung).
Massacre of Kalavryta The Massacre of Kalavryta (Greek: Σφαγή των Καλαβρύτων), or the Holocaust of Kalavryta (Ολοκαύτωμα των Καλαβρύτων), refers to the extermination of the male population and the total destruction of the town of Kalavryta, in Greece, by German occupying forces during World War II, on 13 December 1943. Aside from the deportation and murder of over 80% of Greece's Jewish population, it is the most serious case of war crimes committed during the Axis occupation of Greece during World War II. |
And so many more to this minute unlisted below and yet we encourage this culture in our midst what do you expect to happen in time as these Other cultures experienced and continue to experience - irrational fear of such a cultural genocide construct you have to be suffering from a dangerous delusional state to believe so.
"the Ottoman government's systematic extermination of its minority Armenian subjects inside their historic homeland, which lies within the territory constituting the present-day Republic of Turkey. The total number of people killed as a result has been estimated at between 800,000 and 1.5 million. The starting date is conventionally held to be 24 April 1915, the day Ottoman authorities rounded up and arrested, subsequently executing, some 250 Armenian intellectuals and community leaders in Constantinople." Armenian Genocide Ethiopian Christians beheaded and shot 2015 Kenya: 147 Killed in University Attack, Officials Say 2015
2014, two people were killed in a siege
of a cafe in central Sydney
Pakistan bloody slaughter of more than
140 people — mostly children — in a school massacre. 2014
The 2002 Indonesian Island of Bali
bombings killing 202 people etc
USCIRF Annual Report 2011 - The Commission's
Watch List: Indonesia
“Indonesia's well-known tradition of
religious tolerance and pluralism is being challenged by religious radicalism
and extremist groups who have found converts in the country, leading to sectarian
and societal violence, terrorism, and religious freedom violations. Indonesians
rejected extremism at the polls, but it often goes unchallenged by many political,
civic, and religious leaders. During the reporting period, nearly 40 places of
worship belonging to religious minorities were closed, either forcibly by extremist
groups or through the denial of building permits by government officials. Extremist
groups also instigated violence against religious minorities, including an attack
that led to the death of three Ahmadiyah adherents. New provincial bans on Ahmadiyah
practice have been put in place in East and West Java and South Sumatra. Despite
some strong public statements and arrests, the reactive approach taken by the
Indonesian government has not been an effective deterrent to the violence perpetuated
by non-state actors against religious minorities. Indonesian government officials
also continue to employ the "blasphemy law" (Article 156(a)) to harass
and detain individuals considered religiously "deviant" and continue
to allow the enforcement of local laws restricting the rights of women and some
non-Muslims, particularly in Aceh.” etc
"An estimated 500,000 to 1 million people, some say even millions, perished in 1965–66 as the army, paramilitary groups and religious organizations hunted down members of the Indonesian Communist Party ... ...the organizers hope “it can push the [Indonesian] government to take up the responsibility and the international community to give attention to the third biggest holocaust in the 20th century,” The Memory of Savage Anticommunist Killings Still Haunts Indonesia, 50 Years On TIME Yenni Kwok @yennikwok Sept. 30, 2015 The 'few' are ever in reality how 'few'? Culture makes the 'few' of however many to carry out a cultures constructed behavior, the 'few' do not make it up as they go along or are somehow miraculously 'radicalized' to commit such acts these acts have to be already justified and authorized for such actions to be taken on such a scale - trust such a culture in your midst? At your imminent peril. Islamic State contagion growing in Indonesia SMH August 8, 2015 |
Nazi (Hitler) & Muslim (Mohammed)
Cultural Denial of Culpability for the individual adherent and culture as a whole.
Please note: All text within a cultural
codex containing a genocide construct of Other which may in anyway infer Other
is not targeted for destruction will be found to be qualified immediately after
and/or swim in an ocean of textual and exemplar behaviour which clearly negates its authenticity. This
is because the definition of ‘innocent’ and ‘neighbours’ do not include non-believers.
Any dispute therefore within the culture as to the authenticity of a pro Other
view will be quickly and definitively overwhelmed in an argument between what
Other view as liberal-moderate adherents of a cultural codex containing a genocide
construct of Other and the so called radical.
|
|
"The Jews are guilty! The Jews
are guilty!" .. "We have nothing to contribute
to it, it will come by itself, because it has to come." said Paul
Joseph Goebbels Reich Minister of Propaganda in Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1945
The next sentence:
actions will be carried out "without
pity without mercy" and the rest.
Auschwitz and the rest
|
Quran, Surah 8 Al-Anfal The Spoils
of War 17 It is not ye who slew them; it is Allah: when thou threwest (a handful
of dust), it was not thy act, but Allah's: in order that He might test the Believers
by a gracious trial from Himself: for Allah is He Who heareth and knoweth (all
things). etc
002.256 Let
there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error:
whoever rejects evil and believes in God hath grasped the most trustworthy hand- hold, that never breaks.
And God heareth and knowethall things.
The next sentence:
"Of those who reject faith the
patrons are the evil ones .." and the rest.
Note Non-religious not included.
What happens: "A growing ISIS gang within Australia's highest security prison has threatened to behead correctional officers and inmates who do not convert.." ISIS gang threaten to behead officers and inmates at Goulburn jail Yahoo7 News October 11, 2015 Man tries to strangle Orthodox Jew outside Melbourne synagogue and screams 'swear to Allah' Yahoo News Natasha Christian November 27, 2015
Armenian Genocide and the rest
Has the Muslim terror-genocide and subjugation of Other stopped against Other since the seventh century why do you then believe it can? |
Nazi (Hitler) & Muslim (Mohammed)
Apologists of Foundation texts of terror, genocide and subjugation
|
|
"Experience has taught me that all argument
is useless with fanatical young Nazi of this kind, and so I say nothing."
Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London
1937
Despite the clear evidence in his own writings of the evidence of Other missing from the German streets Norman Hillson continues “the Germans (inclusive of the Nazi) that great unified people are looking for peace and see friendship with Britain as a basis for peace not only for themselves but for everyone else”. Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937 We assure ourselves 'moderates' are in charge for did they not tell us they were such, things could be worse? “In fact, if the extremist’s elements had prevailed. I have not the least doubt that disruption would have been more drastic and that we should have real reason by now to fear German aggression from both a military as well as political point of view.” Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937 |
“It will be challenging to redirect
those who identify with the IS ideology from violent extremism. Any program to
redirect or divert young people must have realistic objectives, the most critical
being to disengage IS supporters from violence rather than de-radicalise them.”
Clarke Jones 2014
“The suggestion that faithful Muslims cannot thrive in a democracy is insulting, dangerous, and wrong,” she (Clinton) said,
“Greens immigration spokeswoman Sarah
Hanson-Young said both major parties had become "hysterical".
"These are a few dozen desperate
people seeking our protection - they are hardly a national security risk,"
she said.”
Australian Greens immigration spokeswoman
Sarah Hanson-Young – ‘a few dozen’?
Really? What of the threat apart from
those clearly increasingly involved in delivering terror first second third generation
what of the tyranny they bring via their cultural constructs of women? The following
arising as a direct construct of women we are to determine as acceptable to have
such a culture cross our borders and remain to flourish?
"A separate study by
the Population Reference Bureau estimates that 507,000 women and girls in the
United States are at risk or have already undergone FGM, where her genitalia are
partially or totally removed to control sexuality and ensure virginity until marriage,
more than twice the number estimated 15 years.
"When you consider that we have many, many immigrant communities in the United States who did not leave their culture behind, the scale is huge," said Amy Logan, co-president of the US National Committee for UN Women in San Francisco who was a consultant for the documentary."
Yahoo7 News June 19, 2015
|
Comment:
|
|
"Hitler's anti-semitism
created an ideological imperative that required an escalating search for an ultimate
or final solution."
The Origins of The Final Solution "The
Evolution of the Nazi Jewish Policy, September 1939-March 1942 Christopher R.
Browning / Jurgen Matthaus 2004
Quran (8: 38:39) Say to the Unbelievers, if (now) they desist (from Unbelief),
their past would be forgiven them; but if they persist, the punishment of those
before them is already (a matter of warning for them).
And fight with them on until
there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in
Allah altogether and everywhere,..."
Muslim terror="the punishment of those before them is already (a matter
of warning for them)."
Quran (31: 23:24) But if any reject the faith, let not his rejection grieve thee: to Us is their return, and We shall tell them the truth of their deeds: for Allah knows well that is in (men's) hearts.
We will grant them their
pleasure for a little while in the end shall We drive them to a chastisement unrelenting.
What has Muhammad created by his construct of Other as an ideological imperative for Muslims?
What happens are the apologists for
cultures whose codex contain genocide constructs of Other correct in their view?
Are there not just one but thousands of facts, evidence to determine at each turn
they are not only wrong but such a view enables terror to escalate and proliferate
not only internal within any Nation State but exported elsewhere as well?
The real cause of terror are not “fathers in work low-paid, unrewarding and unskilled jobs, often absent from home for long periods.” There are numerous examples of professional parent’s doctors and lawyers, teachers, parents of Muslim terrorists and even these doctors, lawyers and teachers becoming terrorists. It is not “mental illness” for the numbers dictate such terrorist behaviour would therefore be reflective in every other culture. Neither is it simply “Other young people have been subject to stringent parenting, where 'foreign' culture and strict religious observance has been enforced. This kind of upbringing has conflicted with Australia's more secular outlook, often leaving them marginalised and in a bemused, helpless or frustrated state.” For other cultures have the same parenting style and seek to enforce cultural beliefs, ethics and values upon their children, and feel they are marginalised, whether factual or otherwise, yet these children do not involve themselves in genocide against Other. “Mr Neumann (director of London's International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation) , speaking last month at the White House Summit to Counter Violent Extremism, touched on a somewhat overlooked aspect of the debate about radicalisation: while marginalisation and a lack of employment or education are common factors among young Western extremists, they are not always present.” Why are young Australians being drawn to Islamic State? The causes and ways of combating the threat of radicalisation ABC, By Paul Donoughue and Lucy Fahey "Literature on aggression often suggests that individual deficiencies, such as social incompetence, psychological difficulties, or troublesome home environments, are responsible for aggressive behavior. In this article, by contrast, we examine aggression from a social network perspective, arguing that social network centrality, our primary measure of peer status, increases the capacity for aggression and that competition to gain or maintain status motivates its use. We test these arguments using a unique longitudinal dataset that enables separate consideration of same- and cross-gender aggression. We find that aggression is generally not a maladjusted reaction typical of the socially marginal; instead, aggression is intrinsic to status and escalates with increases in peer status until the pinnacle of the social hierarchy is attained. Over time, individuals at the very bottom and those at the very top of a hierarchy become the least aggressive youth. We also find that aggression is influenced not so much by individual gender differences as by relationships with the other gender and patterns of gender segregation at school. When cross-gender interactions are plentiful, aggression is diminished. Yet these factors are also jointly implicated in peer status: in schools where cross-gender interactions are rare, cross-gender friendships create status distinctions that magnify the consequences of network centrality." Status Struggles, Network Centrality and Gender Segregation in Same- and Cross-Gender Aggression, Robert Faris, Diane Felmlee, American Sociological Review February 2011 vol. 76 no. 1 48-73 Also it is important to reflect upon whether or not the aggressive nature of such parenting may be in essence inherent in cultures with iniquitous constructs of not only Other but women and therefore require such parenting behavior to instill the conditioning required for the individual adherents to accept, maintain and enforce such relatively draconian constructs which enables a mental schema more easily able to switch to terror against Other. Nor is the cause of terror “For some, simply identifying as IS supporters has given them a feeling of elevation in their social standing among friends and community. It has, in their minds, made them strong and invincible.” For all cultures contain hierarchical and categorised legitimatised positions of power within peer groups and across peer groups within the same culture but these do not lead to genocide against Other. Nor is the cause of terror “Many have been left to their own devices without guidance or direction from a positive role model.” For in cultural terms ‘Many have been left in their own families, educational and religious institutions with guidance or direction from an Islamic/Muslim cultural codex perspective a positive role model.’ The latter is the cause of terror. There is a single pathway to radicalisation – is the Nazi (Hitler) and Muslim (Mohammed) cultural codex construct of Other everything else are excuses and correlations which have no connection to the actual root cause of terror. The cultural genocide constructs of Other are removed from the Public Square or the terror and genocide against Other will intensify with Other reacting in kind. Until as Lincoln informed us either tyranny takes the Public Square or Liberty and Equality. There is a common thread in current public policy of a denial of cultural culpability for the terror emanating from a cultures adherents ‘Few’. The Australian and other Western Governments therefore must accept that the State have failed in their primary duty to protect their citizens by not only allowing a culture adhering to a codex of genocide within but also the financial and other resources required to advance its political power and with it potential to deliver terror against Other citizens and therefore the State have lost all political legitimacy and must be overthrown by democratic means as quickly as possible to restore peace and harmony to the Public Square rather than the ‘managed’ terror the State is currently enabling into citizens streets. |
|
Explain to me again how is it if you claim to be fearful of one ideology informing terror in your streets you are determined as having a mental illness a phobia (an irrational fear) as well as be determined a bigot, but at the same time you are praised as being rational when you claim to be fearful of what the other ideology with exactly the same construct of Other may and does inform in your streets if it is allowed to flourish?
Explain to me why one ideology is determined to be based upon an genocide construct of Other and the other ideology is not, even though the cultural codex constructs of Other are exactly the same?
"German President Joachim Gauck for the first time Thursday called the World War I massacre of 1.5 million Armenians a genocide....
"Women, men, children, and the elderly were indiscriminately sent on death marches, banished without any protection or food to the steppe and the desert, burned alive, chased, beaten, and shot to death," he said. "This planned and calculated criminal act targeted Armenians for a sole reason: because they were Armenians."
The German parliament is due to vote on a genocide motion Friday, which Ankara has downplayed as a potential point of diplomatic confrontation with Berlin. Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu recently said the German government has already indicated it will not use the word."
German President: Armenian Deaths 'Genocide' by Dorian Jones, VOA, April 23, 2015
This is a Theory not a Hypotheses: The Supreme Council of Kenya Muslims (SUPKEM), Islamic Council of Victoria and Vehid Causevic Need to Accept Culpability For Muslim Terror and Stop Shifting Blame For Their Own Evil To Other
Explain to me again why it is two cultures which commit genocide justified and authorized as we see above by their respective cultural codex constructs of Other but only one of the cultures is able to have the 'word' genocide utilized to categorize their behavior?
Explain to me again why it is two cultures with exactly the same inherent construct of Other and one is encouraged and supported with Others resources within the Public Square so its cultures 'Many' families, educational, religious institutions can and do create and sustain the 'Few' to deliver terror against fellow citizens Other within and without the same space and the other culture is purposefully restricted because it is understood its cultural codex construct of Other, which is exactly the same as the other culture, if allowed unfettered access to the Public Square will in time and space inform terror and genocide as the other culture has and is?
Explain to me again why it is two cultures with exactly the same inherent construct of Other which clearly inform terror against Other yet it is accepted one is a culture of Peace and the other is a culture of Evil. And also why it is accepted that the 'Many' of one are liberal-moderates and the 'Many' of the other are evil radical fascists?
Yet the terror the unfathomable grief even at nation against nation level driven by one of these genocide constructs informs the missing the violence against Other and still the Norman Hillsons of 1937 exist once again in the form of Clarke Jones 2014 to sickeningly claim "that great unified people are looking for peace and see friendship with Other as a basis for peace not only for themselves but for everyone else”.
The terror continues and intensifies as both Norman Hillsons of 1937 and Clarke Jones 2014 explicitly acknowledge the missing and the reflected unyielding nature of the underlying codex construct of Other in both cultures "argument is useless with fanatical young" and 'challenging to redirect those who identify with the IS ideology from violent extremism' and still both persist in enabling and even supporting the very culture which delivers such tragic outcomes for humanity and as they do determine themselves and their supporters as holding a moral high ground built upon burning buildings broken bodies and lives.
"Complicating the problem was the terror group’s messages - which are often underpinned by common Muslim ideas such as Sharia as an Islamic law, but with a more extremist element.
“Part of the challenge in countering the ISIS narrative is to counter ideas that Muslims generally subscribe to and accept,” Prof Rane said."
Returning Islamic State foreign fighters face jail, Abbott says THE AUSTRALIAN MAY 19,
2015
And I add with as much restraint as I can find the fool that is Prof Rane goes on to suggest "returned fighters would speak with credibility to those susceptible to ISIS propaganda" after detailing why it is not possible and the fact is these 'reformed' will be seen as Others stooges and traitors to their culture of commonly held ideas. The Quran determines these people if it is at all possible from the first pages as even worse than Other - how do you expect their views will be treated as well as themselves.
Worse still the suggestion to reward insidious behavior against humanity of those who purposefully participated in genocide I find such as Prof Rane suggesting such as these can be utilised for 'good' extremely offensive. What of the victims, burned alive in cages, beheaded on beaches, sex slaves,.... all for a 'narrative' which cannot stand against just the normative sacred beliefs held by Muslims as detailed above which drives this Muslim terror. I am sickened by this world were the victims are forgotten in this postmodernist version of multiculturalism where we are forcefully told and have to accept on pain of being called a bigot diametrically opposed values in the same space will inform peace and security - well where is it? We had peace and security we have not got it now because......
This is what can and is analogised from the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex construct of Other and women Prof Rane and happened also where these so so helpful 'reformed' terrorists have been - Boko Haram Militants Raped Hundreds of Female Captives in Nigeria NYT By ADAM NOSSITER MAY 18, 2015
"Carmen Ortiz, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts, said after the decision that Tsarnaev's crime was not motivated by religion; it was motivated by politics. She said the gravity of the crime, the murder of a child, a police officer and two young women merited the death penalty.
"This was an act of terror," she said. ...
Tsarnaev (Muslim terrorist-Boston April 15, 2013) wrote in the boat: "I don't like killing innocent people, but in this case it is allowed" and "I can't stand to see such evil go unpunished."
Boston Marathon bomber sentenced to death G. Jeffrey MacDonald, Special to USA TODAY 5:48 p.m. EDT May 15, 2015
Definitions:
Ideology: is a set of opinions or beliefs of a group or an individual, refers to a set of political beliefs or a set of ideas that characterize a particular culture.
Religion: is an organized collection of beliefs, cultural systems, and world views that relate humanity to an order of existence.
Politics: is the practice and theory of influencing other people.
Influence: the capacity to have an effect on the character, development, or behaviour of someone or something, or the effect itself.
Terrorism: is violence that is consciously carried out by the perpetrator(s) primarily in order to influence the attitudes and behavior of a wider target audience (or multiple target audiences)
Culture: The totality of socially transmitted behavior patterns, arts, beliefs, institutions, and all other products of human work and thought. Culture is learned and shared within social groups and is transmitted by nongenetic means.
Culture informs:
Culture is not only what people think, it is also what they do. Ideally, cultural explanations would also strive to be mutually non-contradictory ...
Culture, although it cannot ‘do’ anything on its own, provides a framework through which people are motivated to act. Subsequently, incidents of violence are individually and socially understood through narrative, that is, through the stories which are developed by participants, observers and the institutions which deal with them (such as the courts and media). These narratives, in turn, can express motivations or justifications for further violence or, alternatively, for its avoidance or suppression.”
Wood, J. Carter (2007). Conceptualizing cultures of violence and cultural change. In: Carroll, Stuart ed. Cultures of Violence: Interpersonal Violence in Historical Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan.
"Culture uses artifacts, rituals and text to develop and reinforce a shared sense of identity among members. It is the filter through which we see and understand our current reality (Edgar, 1980). .... They also establish boundaries between groups (Oyserman & Lee, 2007)"
Psychology Burton, Western, Kowalski, 2012
"Without the ceaseless pulsating heartbeat of our "categorization engine, we would understand nothing around us, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action.
....
"every culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic labels that come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and entities"
SURFACES AND ESSENCES, ANALOGY AS THE FUEL AND FIRE OF THINKING, Douglass Hofstadter, Emmanuel Sander, 2013
Politics is the practice (action) of influencing people, terror is the political method utilised to influence attitude and behavior. The political action-behavior of a person is determined by "culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforcing ... labels", categorisation, "that belong intrinsically to things and entities" without which the person "would have no basis on which to take any action." Culture not only "provides a framework through which people are motivated to act." culture "establishes boundaries between groups" and how they will be managed and cultural narratives to justify violence.
Religion is an ideology if it contains set of opinions or beliefs refers to a set of political beliefs or a set of ideas that characterize a particular culture, Islam is in essence a political ideology as it has two dimensions: 1. Goals: how society should work, 2. Methods: the most appropriate ways to achieve the ideal arrangement. The Islamic religion contains set of ,beliefs, ethics, values and a set of ideas characterizing the Muslim culture.
Carmen Ortiz, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts, claim that "Tsarnaev's crime was not motivated by religion; it was motivated by politics" cannot be true because politics cannot motivate a person to action, politics is method which informs the action terror not motivation. Motivation the "basis on which to take any action." is defined by culture in this case the Islamic/Muslim culture.
Culture -religion- provides Tsarnaev's justification "but in this case it is allowed" (The fact is the Islamic/Muslim codex enables it is always "allowed" against Other even Muslims determined as such - culture "establish boundaries between groups" and the justification for violence at those boundaries) and for his action (cultural determined punishment method - "deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them" ) terror a political method of achieving influence and Tsarnaev's motivation "I can't stand to see such evil go unpunished.". Culture defines 'evil' which is the motivation to apply the culturally appropriate punishment. In the act of killing the 'innocent' they are no longer innocent they never were nor can be as the Muslim text above clearly determines. The clear characterization of evil Other, numerous codex text exhortations as to the efficacy of 'fighting', the attacks on those who do not do so and the assurance Tsarnaev is not doing the killing by his hand it is Allah's own hand I perceive is culturally constructed to ameliorate the cognitive dissonance and make easier psychologically the killing of Other by Muslims.
Evil intrinsically encapsulates perpetrator, action and victim, punishment the perpetrator, action, victim and punishment have to be culturally categorized for the notion of evil the motivating force justification and authority for culturally defined punishment to be applied. Individuals do not invent these complex interlinked category constructs themselves which are supported by a network of cultural interconnected non-contradictory beliefs, ethics and values which enabled the Muslim culturalised Tsarnaev to kill Other.
It is hard not to despair when the Quran in particular enables so easily the killing of Other apart from Muhammad's exemplar behavior supercharging such atrocities. You look at people still admiring Muhammad, Stalin, and Hitler and you have to seriously consider if there is something seriously askew with the capacity of humans to take on such exemplars as a good. For me it just reinforces how powerful culture is in determining our behavioral variances, and beliefs even against 'truth' right in front of us.
Why the lie 'not religion', 'not culture' when it has to be?
This is not a conspiracy theory it is simply how the world as it stands works
India Village Council Orders R*pes of Two Sisters As Punishment For Brother's Elopement -Women's Rights News 29/08/2015
Clearly no one culture is alone in creating cultural derived psychotic behavior against Other particularly against women, multiculturalism must not be utilised as an excuse to prevent change from occurring in religious or secular ideological constructs - this must stop.
Cultures as with individuals must now be subject to psychological profiling to ascertain if the cultural codex constructs of Other and women inform cultural psychotic beliefs and behaviors.
No longer should cultural derived psychotic behavior be determined as sane under the American Psychiatric Association (APA) DSM-5 Psychotic Disorders Clinical Guide.
Constructs of Other and women which inform such cultural derived psychotic behavior have to be removed from the public square for the protection of humanity particularly women for whom such cultural constructs are invariably directed.
Humanity now have enough social, evolutionary and development psychologists to be able to undertake this very important task-get off your bl**dy couches and do it - protect Other and women and stop utilising post-modernist Moral-Ethical nihilism BS to pretend you psychologists do not know for certain cultures particularly religious are really not in time and space benign and specific cultural codex constructs are deadly regards Other particularly women and will be as we see everyday, not may be, reflected in the behavior of adherents particularly men.
Do it.
This is a Theory not a Hypothesis: “To make one exception means to make them all.” - Clothing such as the Muslim headscarf, hijab, burqa... is a political cultural statement and informs adherence and respect for the ideological constructs attached to it which hold tragic consequences for women.
"The study of political discourse after the Second World War was triggered in part by the investigation of National Socialist (NS) language (Klemperer, 1975/1947); it was essential to understand and explain the roles and importance of language and communication in totalitarian regimes and their propaganda. Utz Maas was the first linguist to subject the everyday linguistic practice of National Socialism to an in-depth analysis: he used NS texts to exemplify his approach ofLesweisenanalyse (Maas, 1984, 1989a, 1989b).
His historical ‘argumentation analysis’, based on the theories of Michel Foucault, demonstrates how discourse is determined by society, i.e. in what may be termed ‘a social practice’. In his analysis of language practices during the National Socialist regime between 1932 and 1938, he showed how the discursive practices of society in Germany were impacted by the NS discourse characterized by social–revolutionist undertones. Nazi discourse had superseded almost all forms of language (practices), a fact that made it difficult for an individual who did not want to cherish the tradition of an unworldly Romanticism to use language in a critical–reflective way. Discourse is basically understood as the result of collusion: the conditions of the political, social and linguistic practice impose themselves practically ‘behind the back of the subjects’, while the actors do not understand ‘the game’ (see also Bourdieu’s ‘violence symbolique’). Discourse analysis identifies the rules which make a text into a fascist text. In the same way as grammar characterizes the structure of sentences, discourse rules characterize utterances/texts that are acceptable within a certain practice. The focus is not on National Socialist language per se, but the aim is rather to record and analyse the spectrum of linguistic relations based on a number of texts dealing with various spheres of life.These texts represent a complicated network of similarities, which overlap and intersect.Therefore, it is also important to do justice to the ‘polyphony’ of texts resulting from the fact that societal contradictions are inscribed into texts (see also the concept of ‘entextualization’ as employed by Blommaert, 2005).Texts from diverse social and political contexts (cooking recipes, local municipal provisions on agriculture, texts by NS politicians, but also by critics of this ideology, who are ultimately involved in the dominant discourse) are analysed in a sample representative of possible texts of NS discourse (see Wodak and deCilla, 2006 for details and an extensive overview of the field of language and politics).
Wodak. Ruth and Meyer. Michael., (2009), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 2nd edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, United States of America
Wodak. Ruth and Meyer. Michael., (2009), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 2nd edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, United States of America
Freedom of Religion
China has understood if Freedom of Religion is to have any meaning infant-child-adolescent must be given the opportunity to freely choose - we know through psychology research early indoctrination of infant-child and adolescent peer group/institutional/family strong network system indoctrination/punishment of religious paradigms in essence removes that right of intellectual/cognitive freedom to accept or reject religion. China also knows to allow actual freedom of religion means freedom to choose the ethics-morals which form their own society their own citizens would be given the same this is not going to happen as defection as in Islam and other tyranny contructs is evil punishable by death or a slow death in prison-concentration of citizens in camps. It is a matter of balance which yes is difficult to achieve but one simply works from a definition of tyrany and develops the power to destroy before they destroy you - do not think they are not working to this end for your existence informs defection.
"New education rules, to come into effect on November 1 and carried by the official Xinjiang Daily, say parents or guardians cannot “organise, lure or force minors into attending religious activities”.
Neither should they promote extremist beliefs in children, nor force them to dress in extremist clothing or other symbols, the newspaper said, echoing the tone of previous rules against beards for men or head coverings for women."
China’s new rules for Xinjiang ban parents from encouraging or forcing children into religion
South China Morning Post, Wednesday, 12 October, 2016
Comments
Post a Comment