Have I sinned? What is a Genocide Construct of Other and Why it is formed?
'The Act of Killing': Genocide re-enacted The film focuses on the Indonesian killings of 1965–1966, an anti-communist purge in which more than 500,000 people were killed. (Please note the link has for some reason been changed a number of times, I update it when I find a change has been made but Otherwise if you do a search on "The Act of Killing': Genocide re-enacted" you will find it on CNN somewhere.)
With terror-genocide constructs determining leaders of such paradigms of hate of Other as the good-moderate is a terrible mistake.
"Indonesia's Defence Minister Ryamizard Ryacudu, also a hardline ex-general, who reportedly said last year that communists killed in the 1960s purge "deserved to die""
Why Indonesian general Gatot Nurmantyo halted military ties with Australia, SMH, Jewel Topsfield, JANUARY 5, 2017
In Indonesia, A Genocide Restaged For The Camera NPR July 18, 2013 Some disturbing clips but underlines how so called moderate Muslims or any who have a genocide construct of Other in their cultural codex as the Nazi can quickly cross the ethical bridge already created infant-child-adolescent-adult to maim, rape, kill torture.... burn,,, Other they, their homes and institutions and still determine themselves afterward as 'good' persons.
How to identify a Cultural Foundation Codex which contains, or is in the process of developing, secular and religious, a genocide construct of Other, which must be for the sake of Humanity excluded with prejudice from the Public Square.
There are five elements required to be present in a cultural codex (textual and exemplar) which are utilized to justify and authorize violence/genocide against Other –
1. The adherents are ‘right’ Other are therefore wrong – “Adherents are right”;
2. Other are not only ‘wrong’ but in being wrong are therefore less, evil-doers, moral pestilence, rotten, Evil,'Exploiters of the masses', fifth columnists, etc
I have a feeling the less rational the cultural derived connection between being ‘wrong’ and being determined ‘evil’ are reflected in the intensity and ferocity by which this cultural construct is enforced internally and externally as a ‘truth’ – where reason can never prevail the degree reason fails to justify a cultural construct violence/fear have to take their place to enforce its ‘truth’.
3.Other cannot be persuaded of the ‘truth’ no matter which method you try to use to convince them - “Spurning the Truth”.
Other cannot be persuaded either through lack of physiological and/or cognitive attributes, “Deaf, Dumb and Blind”, "it is the same to them whether thou warn them or do not warn them; they will not believe", "How futile it was to try to win over such people with argument", etc or a greater power God – supernatural or otherwise (Marx, Lenin, Hume, Adam Smith, Jesus, Mohammad, Confucius, Buddha, Milton Friedman, Skinner, Abe, The Three Tenors, …. whoever) prevents you irrevocably from being able to ‘see’ the ‘truth’ – because you are ‘wrong’, ‘evil’ and beyond convincing - "God hath set a seal on their hearts and on their hearing".
Quran, Surah 8 Al-Anfal The Spoils of War 22 For the worst of beasts in the sight of Allah are the deaf and the dumb - those who understand not.
4. As Other are ‘wrong’, ‘evil’, ‘unable to be convinced of the ‘truth’ they can be justifiably subject to ‘grievous harm’, 'severest penalty’, "..placing his seducer and corrupter against the wall.", "..those who reject our signs,- them shall punishment touch", Quran, Surah 8 Al-Anfal The Spoils of War 12 " Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instil terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their fingertips off them.'
How explicit must the cultural codex instruction be before one determines a culture an inherent threat? etc.
For ‘evil’ natures unable to be changed will inevitably lead to ‘evil’/dangerous cultural outcomes therefore cultural authorization of punishment via the supernatural or otherwise.
5. Cultural deniability of guilt, or accountability for atrocities: It is either someone else's fault God etc or the very 'nature' of Other is the cause of Other's demise.
Quran, Surah 8 Al-Anfal The Spoils of War 17 It is not ye who slew them; it is Allah: when thou threwest (a handful of dust), it was not thy act, but Allah's: in order that He might test the Believers by a gracious trial from Himself: for Allah is He Who heareth and knoweth (all things). etc
Goebbels (Nazi propaganda Minister) "The Jews are guilty! The Jews are guilty!" .. "We (Nazi) have nothing to contribute to it, it will come by itself, because it has to come." ...
"Conflict between the two denominations has been blamed for much of the recent bloodshed in Iraq and Syria, but Gormez said that economic and social factors in areas were the root causes.
"After a century of occupation, dictatorial regimes and suppressed identity, they are trying to express their vengeful anger and hatred by appropriating religion," he said.
"The West looks for the roots of this terror and violence in religion, but these are not the wars of the Middle Ages, which were truly sectarian."
"Muslims need not look beyond themselves for the causes of these conflicts. They should be aware that ... global powers have a responsibility but those are forces they cannot control." Mehmet Gormez, head of the Religious Affairs Directorate, the highest religious authority in Turkey.
Turkey's top cleric calls new Islamic 'caliphate' illegitimate BY AYLA JEAN YACKLEY ISTANBUL Tue Jul 22, 2014 Reuters
Psychology determines a cultural behavioral variance derives from the adherents genetic and culturally derived propensities. The cultural behaviors formed by cultural foundation codex textual and exemplar (messianic) templates which also contribute the nature of the economic, public and private relationships and actions. Therefore the culture informs responses to economic and social relationships not the other way around.
Oppression economic or otherwise has and is not the exclusive domain of majority or even minority Islamist countries where terror exists. Colonialism is not the cause as the Islamic behavioral variance of the actions of ISIS (Islamist State in Iraq and Syria) now in Iraq 2014 and elsewhere are the same as those of Mohammad (exemplar (messianic) template) in the seventh century supported clearly by the text in the Quran.
The Muslim terrorist behavior is therefore derived directly from the Islamic culture not external from it. It is the Muslim 'norm' as defined by the Islamic codex. To determine it is not because it does not fit with 2014 notions of human rights is to deny the reality Islamic codex contains none of these human rights precepts - Other and women are subject and conform or else.
The very nature of Islamic politic have created theocratic dictatorships by imposing them themselves or reactionary forces in the same space determining the same construct was required to reduce Islam political hold on power - either through necessity or simply no means of intellectually or politically of realising another more inclusive framework.
Both the Muslims and Nazi operate under the rapist construct 'They were asking for it'.
Some secular atheists view themselves as immune when given the political power under whatever associated dogma from inexorably moving from genocide levels 1 to 4. As happened in Russia etc where clearly those with atheists views taking up secular constructs such as socialism tragically prove - atheists views at the very least did not impose sufficient, if any ethical codex blockers to stop the persecutions against religions nor anyone else subject to socialist terror.
“..she stormed away saying the socialists had killed her grandparents.” Reaction of a person at a party in England when another person at the party revealed they were a socialist. Source: A socialist site discussing how to improve the image of Socialism. And the Socialists did kill her Grandparents. Socialism its adherents claims does not authorize this, as Religious entities claim the same. Yet it continues to happen. Why?
Socialist as Muslims deny their respective dogmas support terror when allowed to have enough power to do so. Could it be within the socialist manifesto certain groups of persons are defined as Other? One would expect so.
"The problem with the communist solution, however, was that the Bolsheviks had been killing from the moment they seized power, and seemed to relish it. "Comrade!" Lenin wrote to one commissioner in August 1918. "Hang (and I mean hang so that the people can see) not less than 100 known kulaks [prosperous peasants], rich men, bloodsuckers... Do this so that for hundreds of miles around people can see, tremble, know and cry: they are killing and will go on killing the bloodsucking kulaks..
"P.S. Find tougher people."
Source: WAR, WHAT IS IT GOOD FOR? THE ROLE OF CONFLICT IN CIVILISATION, FROM PRIMATES TO ROBOTS. Ian Morris, (Willard Professor of Classics and a fellow of Archaeology Centre at Stanford University), 2014, p258.
It should be noted though atheism depending on political circumstance does not necessarily move from 1 to 4 because its cultural foundation codex does not contain an inherent genocide construct of Other, Muslims and the Nazi will as we have seen and are seeing.
"Waging war on Christianity, ISIS (Islamist State in Iraq and Syria) demanded any non-Muslims to pay a levy in gold of 14g and curb displays of their faith or face death - although less than one per cent of Raqqa's 300,000 inhabitants are Christian.
In a statement, the group claimed to have met Christian leaders and offered them three choices: convert to Islam, accept the conditions, or face death.
It stated: 'If they reject, they are subject to being legitimate targets, and nothing will remain between them and ISIS other than the sword.'
Many Christians fled after ISIS started attacking and burning churches."
#horror: The moment Muslim Syrian extremists cut off a man's hand as punishment for stealing - and posted pics LIVE on Twitter By SARA MALM and MIA DE GRAAF PUBLISHED: 20:40 GMT, 28 February 2014
"China blamed militants from the restive far western region of Xinjiang on Sunday for an attack at a train station on the other side of the country by knife-wielding "terrorists" in which at least 33 died, including four of the assailants, who were shot dead."
China blames Xinjiang militants for deadly attack at station BY BEN BLANCHARD BEIJING Sat Mar 1, 2014
The above are cultural conversion messages submit or else, the nature of the Chinese act sends not only a message internal to China but external as well to Other, there is nowhere Islam/Muslims cannot or will not reach, no depth of depraved violent terror they will not perpetrate on Other, inclusive of enabling outbreaks of deadly diseases such as polio. Most of those who looked at the Nazi in Germany in the 1930's with exactly the same Islamic/Muslim construct of Other determined what happens over there will not affect me. What happens in reality has the Islamic cultural behavioral variance determined Muslims show any regard for borders ethical or Nation?
We know what happens if we allow the unleashing of the Nazi yet even Muslims themselves despite the daily count of Muslim derived broken bodies and lives fail to see they adhere to exactly the same construct of Other as the Nazi albeit surrounded by a religious context not secular.
In this case the caricature of the overlay of the Muslim by the Nazi fits perfectly for the outcomes are the same for exactly the same reasons genocide steps 1-5 is inherent in both.
How do you go about it. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child...