How do you go about it. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child Lost is One Child Too Many. One Child...

Until each human knows within their heart each daughter is my daughter, each son is my son, each mother is my mother, each father is my father we will let apathy and our Cultural Foundation Codex ‘Other Last – If At All’ be their last memory of us.

It is not a matter of demonizing, stigmatizing nor erroneous stereotyping it is a matter of the evidence.

Recourse to the immediacy of cultural counter argument, as each sentence and idea is encountered, in an attempt to ignore the evidence and reinforce bias from either adherent or non-adherent will not sweep the burning buildings, broken bodies and lives from in front of humanity -
as each new generation regurgitate the exact same culturally derived codex excuse for their diabolical behaviour to blame Other for their own cultural codex derived behavioural variance. Own it.

You have a genocide construct of Other anywhere within your cultural codex in time and space it will manifest itself in your cultural behavioural variance 'spectrum' within whatever Public Square it is allowed to enter.

My view is the cost of just one child's life and the unfathomable grief such a loss brings is not worth such a culture being allowed anywhere near the Public Square. Yet humanity have evidence of thousands upon thousands historic and current, apart from the oppression of Other and women in particular, yet we do not act. I am saying we should and we must.

Just one child?

"Communities (cultures) tend to be guided less than individuals by conscience and a sense of responsibility. How much misery does this fact cause mankind! It is the source of wars and every kind of oppression, which fill the earth with pain, sighs and bitterness." (Albert Einstein, 1934)

How is it done, with so many so called self-defined moderate
'individuals of conscience and a sense of responsibility'? As it always has been, cultural altruistic punishment imposed by a few with increased intensity - cultural incentive positive and negative imposed by the 'good' and the 'radical' where the difference in ethics is only the method violent/non-violent each riding upon the back of the other to achieve the same political end. Violent/non-violent justified and authorised by cultural codex otherwise it would not be possible.

Sir Albert Bore, leader of the city's Labour-run council, apologised on Friday to the people of Birmingham "for the way the actions of a few, including some within the council, have undermined the great reputation of our city".
Fears of Islamophobia gave activists free rein in Birmingham schools Helen Pidd, Patrick Wintour and Lyndsay Warner The Guardian, Saturday 19 July 2014 05.45 AEST

But is it really the 'few', for without underlying jointly held cultural ethical constructs how is it possible to achieve the enabling silence of the so called majority 'moderates' of any culture to enable the 'few' to do what they do so well, impose a 'radical' agenda- time after time? It is because the 'radical' agenda is the 'good' cultural outcome the cultural leaders and more importantly cultural exemplars and textual codex have determined generation after generation  as the 'right' way of life to be aspired to.

Therefore the culture as a whole is responsible for outcomes such a culture informs 'good' or 'evil'.

"• Parents do not have the confidence to argue against the articulate and forceful activists who seek to impose their views, for fear of being branded as disloyal to their faith or their community."
Patrick Wintour, Political editor The Guardian, Wednesday 23 July 2014

“The extremists (imams) often start by teaching people about the parts of the Qu’ran — Islam’s holy book — that have never been mentioned by their imams and then inject violent thoughts in people by misinterpreting doctrines,” he (Adudulkrep, head of the state-run Xinjiang Islamic Institute) said.
....
If the religious leaders compete with the (religious leader) extremists on Islamic knowledge, I cannot guarantee that they would win. That’s what worries me,” said Adudulkrep, who is also head of the (China) state-run Xinjiang Islamic Institute."

CHINA LOSING BATTLE AGAINST EXTREMIST ISLAMIC TEACHINGS, SAYS MUSLIM OFFICIAL MARCH 30, 2015

The two statements above tell us exactly why "(Muslim) liberal-moderate Parents and religious leaders do not have the 'confidence' or ability to argue successfully against the articulate and forceful Muslim religious leader activists".

Why? “If the liberal-moderate religious leaders compete with the (religious leader) "violent, radical, fanatical, nihilistic" extremists on Islamic knowledge, the Islamic knowledge the liberal-moderate religious leaders utilise cannot guarantee that liberal-moderate religious leaders would win.", this is because as logic would dictate the so called (religious leader) 'extremists' are ‘teaching people from the Qu’ran — Islam’s holy book’ the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex of beliefs, ethics and values and exemplar behavior, which are justified and authorized by the same Qu’ran — Islam’s holy book from which these same liberal-moderate parents and religious leaders utilise to obtain Islamic knowledge to counter (religious leader) extremists Islamic knowledge.

The Qu’ran — Islam’s holy book as a whole is determined as sacrosanct and as it determines within all statements even if apparently contradictory remain valid (this in itself therefore a sacrosanct statement) ALL beliefs, ethics, values within the Qu’ran inclusive of the ethics of "violent, radical, fanatical, nihilistic" belief — Islam’s holy book from whatever part remains a valid source of Muslim belief, ethics and values. You cannot therefore argue Is-Islam selection of part of the Quran is any less valid than the Not-Islam selection of part of the Quran as each part the Qu’ran — Islam’s holy book is sacrosanct and therefore valid.

Also what the above statements inform is even worse for Other (even Muslims themselves determined as such) because the liberal-moderate religious leader utilization of Islamic knowledge from selective parts of the Qu’ran — Islam’s holy book can in no way guarantee such Islamic 'moderate' knowledge will counter (religious leader) extremist Islamic "violent, radical, fanatical, nihilistic" knowledge derived from the same source in fact the statement by Adudulkrep, who is head of the (China) state-run Xinjiang Islamic Institute, infers the liberal-moderate religious leaders would lose.

This is the reason for the Parents being in "fear of being branded as disloyal to their faith or their community." it is not derived at its core by fear of the violence against Parents a Muslim extremist can and does do, it is that the Parents cannot with any Islamic codex they select as justification and authorisation override the Islamic "violent, radical, fanatical, nihilistic" codex justification and authorisation which determines such extremist violence within the Islamic/Muslim cultural 'rational' model as valid. Of course they are afraid of being 'branded disloyal' because such a values position justifiably challenged by the very same codex which they claim supports their position clearly it does not for if it did there would be absolutely no reason for Parents being in "fear of being branded as disloyal to their faith or their community." because the extremists would simply not exist as the Islamic codex would give them no cultural justification and authorisation for their behavior.

The so called (religious leader) extremists (from a Western cultural rational model perspective) therefore are known by 'moderate' (religious leaders) to have potentially greater Islamic codex justification and authorisation underwriting extremist Islamic knowledge than the 'moderate' religious leaders and claims by so called 'moderate' Muslims the behavior of Muslim terrorists are not justified and authorised by the Islamic/Muslim codex are therefore lies and worse still either must know this to be true or are suffering a psychotic delusional state for anyone who has one eye, even without the ability to read the Islamic/Muslim codex or history, can perceive the obvious Islamic/Muslim cultures connection to the burning buildings, broken bodies and lives before them.

"I cannot hide my pain today. A true Muslim was punished for doing which [sic] the collective will of the nation failed to carry out."
Glasgow mosque leader praises extremist killer By Calum McKay BBC Scotland 25 March 2016

"Mr Ali has been recorded saying that over the course of seven years he had identified 240 'radicals Islamists' within his community (Australian) centre, 120 of whom continue to have extremist views and are seen to potentially be on a path to "extreme acts".
Mr Nawaz, who says he understands extreme Islamist groups because he was once a true believer, thinks Mr Ali's admission is a serious concern."
Eradicating radical Islam July 3, 2013, 6:18 pm James Thomas Today Tonight

The ‘true’ Islam resides within whatever Muslim analogised behavior are determined by adherents as reflective of the 'true-perfect belief' contained within the Islamic/Muslim codex and importantly the Islamic/Muslim codex words and sentences can be integrally connected to them. For to claim the condition of 'true-perfect believer' exists one has to be certain such behavior reflecting this 'true-perfect belief' state exists and can be readily be shown to be so in a belief system rationale otherwise one would have no reason whatsoever to make such a claim. Certainly given the human condition there is room for error, but mere statistical analysis of the number of such claims by leaders and followers alike, even claims from those determining themselves once 'true-perfect believers' clearly points to the Western categorisation of 'extremist' being an Islamic/Muslim  'true-perfect believer'.

Simply determining this is not the case given the evidence of bloodied bodies each and every day before humanity and determining Islam is an ideology of peace composed of 'liberal-moderates' reflecting back diminishingly Others beliefs, ethics and values ignoring the always present 'extremists derived from the very ranks of the so called 'liberal-moderate' Muslim families, communities and institutions existent in the same behavoral variance and therefore the Islamic/Muslim culture is not an intrinsic threat to Western notions of Liberty and Equality is a very dangerous thing to do – for in leaving the Is-Islam in play also leaves the overriding Not-Islam in the Public Square as well to continually inform terror and intensify major schism as can be clearly seen elsewhere. It also ignores a truth Not-Islam adherents are being derived from the Is-Islam space if they were really unconnected ethically this would not be happening. Is one Child's life worth such a culture being in our midst?  Just one fellow citizen being shot in the back of the head?

Islam is either a "violent, radical, fanatical, nihilistic" fascist construct or it is not, you cannot have a condition which informs Half Free Half Slave and determine the entity Free. To determine a culture is peaceful when it systemically informs "violent, radical, fanatical, nihilistic"  adherent behavior is the same as determining Hitler, Stalin and Pol Pot as worthy exemplars and the "violent, radical, fanatical, nihilistic" behavior of their followers as not reflective of the nature of these leaders nor has anything to do with their ascribed cultural codex which causes the behavior to occur - it is pure insanity. Yet this is the kafkaesque reality humanity have created in maintaining in the Public Square Is-Islam Not-Islam of 'It is our cultural differences which make us stronger."to inform increasing terror and grief.

"It is very clear what I mean, which is that there is a violent, radical, fanatical, nihilistic interpretation of Islam by a faction … within the Muslim community that is our enemy, and that has to be defeated."
Obama: To Stop Terrorism Islam Must Reconcile Itself To Modernity April 4, 2016 by Michael Stone

"fascist imams who are not necessarily qualified"
Former chief of Islamic body warns of rise of Islamic fascism THE AUSTRALIAN SEPTEMBER 25, 2014

As we can see 'fascist imams are necessarily qualified' from exactly the same Islamic codex source as the so called non-fascist imams. And as the previous argument details there is a reason why there is a "rise of Islamic fascism" it is an integral part of the Islamic codex and also the justification and authorisation of it existence cannot be overcome by a liberal-moderate narrative because the liberal-moderate narrative does not have the same level of Islamic codex justification and authorisation as Islamic fascism. The proof is that firstly Islamic fascism is able to exist in the first place and secondly it manages to rise in the face of repeated claims of a liberal-moderate majority/many.

"Enough is enough. It is time to speak out.

“Islam is innocent” is an incomplete sentence. Introspection is needed, for, if we shy away from reality, the alternative will be more images like those we witnessed last Tuesday night, when brave Lt. Muath Al Kasasbeh was burnt to death in a cage."

‘We have a problem’ by Zaid Nabulsi The Jordon Times Feb 10, 2015

"Pressed on whether the ANIC had been vocal enough in condemning young jihadis travelling abroad, Mr Benegadi referred The Australian to a press release issued by the council in June in response to suggestions by the chief of the NSW Counter-Terrorism Squad, Peter Dein, that the Muslim ­leadership had been “very passive” in the face of home-grown jihadis."
Islamic leaders deny silence on local jihadists THE AUSTRALIAN AUGUST 08, 2014 

The “very passive” does not only apply, nor the reasons for such passivity to Muslim Parents as it has to necessarily apply to the Muslim ­leadership the so called liberal-moderate cultural altruistic enforcers - for where do liberal-moderate Parents obtain their lead? Clearly such liberal-moderate Muslim leaders do not have sufficient Islamic codex justification and authority to be the 'real' Muslim cultural altruistic enforcers which explains the “very passive” nature of their response to the rise of Islamic fascism within their space. Who then does?

Why does Other have to hear the same message Muslim leaders claim they are giving to their communities that Muslim terror is not a good? Because Other have no faith the very culture from which the terror is emanating are doing enough to stop it, as it keeps coming and intensifies. Muslim leaders saying we communicate our objections in our own community is a worthless exercise because it clearly is not working. Other want to hear the words and know what actions are actually being taken on Others behalf to protect them from the Muslim community itself.

"Report reveals gang rape and trafficking of 1400 children over 16 years. ...Sometimes they were afraid of being accused of racism if they talked about the perpetrators mostly being Pakistani taxi drivers."

The 'few' determine their response by what mechanism, justification and authorisation - from their own derived ethical construct? There is no external connection at all?

"More than 1,400 children were sexually abused over a 16 year period by gangs of paedophiles after police and council bosses turned a blind eye for fear of being labelled racist, a damning report has concluded.

It appears there was at a senior level a collective blindness over many years to the suffering of children who endured almost incomprehensible levels of violence and intimidation."
Rotherham sex abuse scandal: 1,400 children exploited by Asian gangs while authorities turned a blind eye By Martin Evans, Crime Correspondent The Telegraph 8:51PM BST 26 Aug 2014

The debilitating fear the 'few' Gate Keepers experienced and or enforced came from where?

Not from the imposition of 'Freedom of Religion and Multiculturalism as a good which frames a non-existent mental illness Islamophobia? And determines anyone raising objections to another cultural norms as bigots, racists? These Gate Keepers have to have been subject directly to or observed action of altruistic punishment based upon their own cultural codex directional response. Unless this cultural codex is identified, changed or deleted this will happen again and I would proffer is occurring even now for exactly the same reason.

There is no pattern of cultural enforced 'fear' emerging which is preventing action against cultural derived evil?

"Several staff described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought racist; others remembered clear direction from their managers (cultural altruistic enforcers)   not to do so"

The framework of Freedom of Religion and Multiculturalism has created these failures by implementing laws and norms which silence questions/accusations about the nature/ethics of any culture or the adherents of those cultures by setting a very dangerous norm that
"any action which is reasonably likely, in all the circumstances, to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate another person or a group of people" is a crime. 

What has this enabled where 'reasonably likely' and 'offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate' are so open to interpretation that one simply says nothing. Here is the proof above where what was considered completely unacceptable behaviour now becomes tolerated or even accepted as a cultural ethic. Each of us determine ourselves above being culturally influenced to ether do harm directly to Other or stand back silently to enable it to occur - We are completely mistaken as to our capacity to resist because we simply are already primed to do so.

"Macquarie University’s Professor Kathryn Millard said volunteers escalated the shocks believing they were acting for a noble cause — science.

Stephen Reicher, a professor at the University of St Andrews in Scotland, said the implications were far-reaching.

It showed that ordinary people could commit acts of extraordinary harm, but that thoughtlessness was not the main motivator, he said.

“We argue that people are aware of what they are doing, but that they think it is the right thing to do,” he said.

“This comes from identification with a cause — and an acceptance that the authority is a legitimate representative of that cause.”
Evil not so banal, says new study AFP SEPTEMBER 08, 2014 2:12 PM

One must ask the question how quickly, when already supplied with the justification and authorization of a cultural codex of a genocide construct of Other does an imbued/primed infant-child-adolescence 'good' be turned to 'radical' adult given the cultural codex itself frames authority consistently constantly to promote such a genocide construct as a cultural 'good'?

"Authorities believe these two unlikely self-styled sheiks exerted a powerful influence over 18-year-old Abdul Numan Haider in his fatal slide towards extremism."
Sheiks influenced teenage extremist Numan Haider
CAMERON STEWART AND MARK SCHLIEBS HERALD SUN SEPTEMBER 26, 2014 6:40AM

Five inconvenient questions for those such as Australian Prime Minister Abbott fallaciously determining cultural terror is a simple generic crime and Muslims as a Cultural whole are not responsible:

1. "ordinary teenagers" are not already imbued with cultural beliefs/ethics which have to already exist for them to be influenced by others to cross the ethical bridge to terror?

2. What culture formed "these two unlikely self-styled sheiks", or did they just appear out of thin air?

3. How is it any Muslim cleric seen as a possible 'radical' are now referred to as "unlikely self-styled sheiks" rather than what they are Muslim clerics?

4. How far in fact did "18-year-old Abdul Numan Haider" have to slide ethically before he met "these two unlikely self-styled sheiks"?

5. What would systems analysis say about the validity of the disconnect of Muslim derived terror and major schism from the actual source the Islamic/Muslim culture itself?

Does it matter being primed with such a Islamic/Muslim construct of Other, the direction to move from 'good' to 'radical' is external to the immediate space of the adherent i.e. in a globalised world of advanced communication technology enabling covert and not so covert cultural altruist enforcement across borders to align to already justified and authorized acts simply being culturally replicated from current and historical Muslim cultural exemplar templates?

How many times do we have to reflect upon the meaning of "barbaric" and "literally beyond belief" in time and space regards Muslims behaviour to determine there is something inherently evil emanating from the Islamic/Muslim culture and systems theory would tell us this behaviour must exist because it serves a Muslim cultural purpose/function.

Reflect on the following and ask yourself why do you think Muslim culture inherently contains the justification and authorisation (purpose/function) of terror and violence internal and external to perpetuate itself? Also does this not underline the idea ISIS or anyone else external is the only or even the main cause of Muslim radicalisation when you have exactly the same ideology being allowed without check within Australian space itself.

"Hizb ut-Tahrir is a (Australian) political party whose ideology is Islam, so politics is its work and Islam is its ideology. It works within the Ummah and together with her, so that she adopts Islam as her cause and is led to restore the Khilafah and the ruling by what Allah (swt) revealed. Hizb ut-Tahrir is a political group and not a priestly one. Nor is it an academic, educational or a charity group. The Islamic thought is the soul of its body, its core and the secret of its life.

1. The Reasons for the Establishment of Hizb ut-Tahrir

Hizb ut-Tahrir was established in response to the saying of Allah

"Let there be among you a group that invites to the good, orders what is right and forbids what is evil, and they are those who are successful"

Its purpose was to revive the Islamic Ummah from the severe decline that it had reached, and to liberate it from the thoughts, systems and laws of Kufr, as well as the domination and influence of the Kufr states. It also aims to restore the Islamic Khilafah State so that the ruling by what Allah revealed returns."

Hizb ut-Tahrir (Australian) political party

Reflect how such notions, so anti-Western Democracy actually provide the motivation for terror given Muslims inherently know as detailed in the Quran we Other are not going to go quietly into the night and be subject without shackles to such a heinous societal construct/system of oppression particularly for women. The notion of authority promoting the very codex construct of Other in part or whole being determined as a norm within the Muslim cultural behavioural variance and thereby forms the ethical bridge by which an adherent can and does traverse very quickly from 'good' to 'radical' under Islam relative to Other cultures with less defined negative constructs of Other via textual and exemplar behaviours.



The existence of any so called 'good'/'moderates' already primed under such a construct of Other based squarely on the cultural codex, being subject to cultural authority external to the adherents immediate space i.e. ISIS authority figures in Iraq etc., feed directly into the adherent belief of an already primed Islamic codex identifiable genocide construct of Other being a 'good' and therefore despite cultural authorities in the adherents immediate space all determining otherwise (which in realty 'all' has not happened - given the codex this is not unexpected) as the Islamic codex clearly justifies and authorizes such genocidal acts as 'good', so combined with authority such a cultural genocide construct will inform adherent action. As it has and will continue to do so until it is realized by Muslims and Other alike the Islamic codex is a genocide construct and has to be removed from the Public Square for good.

If you generate as a culture terror against Other and you complain when Other enforces its right to a flourishing life, what reply do expect Other to give - an apology?
 .
Heritage Foundation Panelist on Radical Islam | CNS News




Any dogma, be it secular or religious, which enables the escape from the judgement of reason via cultural foundation codex construct of justification and authorisation for action via divine inspiration and/or human direction of 'grievous harm' or 'severest penalty' must be rationally determined as an inherent threat to humanity and swiftly removed from the Public Square. No amount of so called liberal moderates of adherents to such a dogma in time and space will dull the marching fervour across the broken bodies of Other.

Is even one victim of such a dogma worthy of the terrible price of its admittance?

Your child?

It is not always someone elses, not my concern, is it, until? Those heads held in the hand of the Australian Muslim in Iraq at the same time the same Muslim determines
“Did you think I would leave your country without leaving a surprise. Fireworks coming up soon keep a close eye.”.
Aussie terrorists send out warning by Mitchell Nadin, Paul Maley, THE AUSTRALIAN JULY 30, 2014

It is inevitable as in Bali, as in Boston, as in Pakistan, as in Afghanistan, as in Russia, as in .... as from the 7th century to the 21st century........ Statistically untenable to say Islam does not inform systemic terror and major schism, despite as with the Nazi the ever present 'moderate'.

We observe once again:
"Experience has taught me that all argument is useless with fanatical young Nazi of this kind, and so I say nothing." Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937

We know that not only does Other say nothing in fear of attack, from the young and inevitably the not-so-young fanatic/fundamentalist 'few', as in Birmingham, nor do adherents claiming to be 'moderates', adherents open supporters of exactly the same ideology. And yet we determine forcefully despite increasing violence against Other and the missing:
“the Germans (inclusive of the Nazi) that great unified people are looking for peace and see friendship with Britain as a basis for peace not only for themselves but for everyone else”. Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937

We assure ourselves 'moderates' are in charge for did they not tell us they were such, things could be worse?

“In fact, if the extremist’s elements had prevailed. I have not the least doubt that disruption would have been more drastic and that we should have real reason by now to fear German aggression from both a military as well as political point of view.” Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937

We can see this changed mindset of accepting the once '2007 Iraq:
"violence that was often savage quite literally beyond belief" (D, Kilcullen, 2009) as the lesser evil even though we utilise the exact same terms "barbaric", "beyond belief" where in determining the Islamic State Iraq/Syria as now even worse but utilizing the exact same terminology. Is it really worse than previous Muslim behaviour against Other? Humanity have not seen this Muslim behaviour before in this century or the previous enacted anywhere derived from Muslim communities?

"For Al Qaeda, meanwhile, disputes with the Islamic State are an opportunity “to reposition themselves as the more rational jihadists,” said Daveed Gartenstein-Ross, a researcher at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies."
ISIS’ Harsh Brand of Islam Is Rooted in Austere Saudi Creed By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK SEPT. 24, 2014

As Kilpatrick from the New York Times underlines this behaviour is not new. In fact the only difference in between lulls is the quantitative utilisation of the exact same methods inherent in Islamic/Muslim violence which is continual at isolated local levels. We have come to accentuate ISIS behaviour only because of the scale which indicates a greater capacity to inform the same elsewhere-the threat of Muslim violence to be able to be actually delivered to us as individuals, cultures has increased - that is all. Whereas the actual Muslim behaviours have not ceased as a template since the seventh century. There has to be a cultural system continual belief/ethical flow to enable this stock of terror/violence exhibited by ISIS to exist in the first place. Such cultural behaviour has to have a justification and authorisation to 
exist.

Terror-genocide simply develops in both directions.

Lebanon: Christian village hit by multiple suicide attacks BBC, 28/6/2016

And
 importantly there has to be a cultural system purpose/function for terror/violence to be an element in Islamic Muslim culture system otherwise it would not exist. What was the reality, more importantly as there is nothing we can do about the past, what is the reality with Islam/Muslims now? If trends of growing cultural ethical constructs publically stated in text, voice and actions show a movement towards terror, major schism and subjugation of women why do we believe things will get better - wishful thinking, future bias - does it work?

And what else does Islam/Muslims inform which humanity must be rid of?
“The conversation took a turn for the worse when they told me that my ideas were un-Islamic and that Islam grants women full dignity ‘within the four walls of her home’.” Women’s MidEasts Posts 2013

Our lives are constructed exactly the same as buildings some of our architects and builders can only build four walls, others have created palaces with many rooms – is it wrong to determine you are not satisfied with four walls and want to change architect and builder?

That is not to say in a palace there may not still be some problems with plumbing, nothing is perfect. Also we have to be careful not to believe to readily four walls constitute a palace.

Strangely a very dangerous thing to do changing architects and builders for some of our dearest fellow travellers particularly women – who can see there are many more rooms attached even to their own four walls yet women are still not able to enter. The palace it appears are for Man only where the 'full dignity' of man is realised, women's dignity according to the Male prescribed codex is to be realised within four walls - they only need four walls, after all they are only women.


“..education of women in particular fosters patterns of thinking that greatly improve quality of life, for both parents and children.”
Development Through the Lifespan, Fifth Edition Laura E. Berk

I noticed Laura did not say ‘men in particular’ yet men work so diligently via the justification and authorisation of Mans defined sacred codex construct of women, an escape from the judgment of reason, to keep women within their four walls – what could life be like for all of us if all this potential was enabled to be realized?

THE ISLAMIC CULTURAL CODEX (TEXTUAL AND EXEMPLAR) MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE PUBLIC SQUARE AS IT IS A PROVEN GENOCIDE CONSTRUCT AS WELL AS AN ERRONEOUS JUSTIFICATION AND AUTHORISATION FOR MANS POWER OVER WOMENS DESTINY.

Why Has it come to this - It is because there comes a time when it becomes obvious (statistically, rationally) a Culture, despite the ever present so called Liberals/Moderates, can and does cause terror(cultural war) against and major schism within the Societies they exist. The culture is justifiably feared much more than the individuals within because of the actions the cultural behavioural variance 'spectrum', in time and space consistently constantly from generation to generation, inform against Other and/or women, internal and external.

There is a growing Muslim and Other intellectual/political elite recognition.
Author: Ed Husain, Senior Fellow for Middle Eastern Studies
Eradicating radical Islam July 3, 2013, 6:18 pm James Thomas Today Tonight
Blair: Radicalized Islam a growing threat April 23, 2014 - 5:35 AM Associated Press
The Telegraph, By Damien McElroy 2:29PM BST 19 Aug 2013

Cultural Foundation Codex (genetic, (con) textual authority and exemplar (messianic) templates) =Ethics=Ideas= Motivation=Consistent Cultural/Adherent Behavioural Variance ('spectrum') =Cultural Action For and Against Other.

Where Cultural (political) Foundation I perceive aligns to Andrew Vincent's view:

“The term foundation is used in a very broad sense. It is taken to imply some class of statements or propositions, which are favoured absolutely over others. To be foundational, this class of statements is regarded as fundamental – fundamental implying that its processors cannot avoid deferring or referring back to it. This class of statements is, in other words, always presupposed by diversity of other statements. Insofar as this class of statements is fundamental, it can be considered near inescapable or near unavoidable in any theorizing. Foundational statements also allow inferences and systematic deductions to be made, which explain and account for a range of other statements. Foundational statements, therefore, have an encompassing capacity. They ensure the overall coherence of a range of other statements. This coherent set of interlinked statements constitutes a theory. My use of the term foundation has close parallels with other terms such as metaphysics, first principles, or absolute presuppositions.”

Also

"culture... shared rules that govern the behaviour of a group of people and enable members of that group to co-exist and survive. Schein (1992) say culture lies at the level of basic assumptions and beliefs. Culture involves shared values, beliefs, attitudes and behaviours that distinguish one group from members of others (Lehman, Chiu, & Schaller, 2004). It is something you learn even subconsciously, and it shapes your awareness of the world around you. Samuals, a psychologist specialising in life-span development, describes this process of subconsciously absorbing cultural norms, mores and expectations as 'the cultural trance' (personal communication, June 18, 2004). Culture uses artifacts, rituals and text to develop and reinforce a shared sense of identity among members. It is the filter through which we see and understand our current reality (Edgar, 1980). These are the structures of identity that help people organise and make sense of everyday life (Wark, 1997). They also establish boundaries between groups (Oyserman & Lee, 2007)
......
Your identity comes not just from the cultural environment in which you live today, but from historical influences that have shaped that culture. The way you develop depends not only on your innate personal characteristics but also the interplay with the cultural surrounds that envelop everything in your life."
Psychology Burton, Western, Kowalski, 2012

The point of the above is to emphasise societal major schism is occurring and intensifying because
"Culture uses artifacts, rituals and text to develop and reinforce a shared sense of identity among members.”. Islam/Muslims "uses artifacts, rituals and text to develop and reinforce a shared sense of identity among members." which justifies and authorises terror against Other and subjugation of women from generation to generation. And also that to change the outcomes these 'artifacts, rituals and text' which underwrite major schism have to be removed from the Public Square if in the long run at least one facet of tyranny against humanity will be removed.

To propose those who claim so consistently and in such numbers to be Muslims, are identified as such by many other Muslims, who can point to the artifacts, rituals and text which develop and reinforce a shared view their behaviour of terror against Other and misogynistic behaviour is valid within an Islamic construct are not Muslim begs the question. Where is the completely distinct, unconnected, separate 'culture' from Islam/Muslims
'artifacts, rituals and text' which have framed their terrorist and/or misogynistic behaviour? You cannot provide this alternative 'culture' can you? Therefore Islam/Muslims are directly responsible for these crimes against humanity and must be held accountable and a remedy enforced with prejudice if Muslims do not accede to do so themselves.

Why should one more child have to die to provide comfort to multiculturalists who believe if we all sit down and have a chat over a can of beans everything will be OK? Is it, has it ever been? Why not? It is because there are no potential ethical conflicts inherent in a can of beans. Wishful thinking will not stop two diametrically opposed ethical constructs causing terror.

As Lincoln rightly points out either one or the other will in the end take over the Public Square. Humanity sees this so clearly when Islam and genocide constructs like it as the Nazi ideology takes political control - does Other remain with Liberty, Equality and Fraternity within the Public Square? In understanding nothing stays the same, strategic inflection points are just as applicable to cultures, Romans, Egyptians, Persians, Greeks, Chinese, Indians,.... as they are to any other facet of life.

Surely experience must dictate a new approach. A culture which informs via its foundation codex your justified 'grievous harm' and severest penalty' with actual burning buildings, broken bodies and lives across time and space over more than a thousand years proving such foundation codex are not merely words strung together for no purpose must be treated with extreme caution as to its claims of wanting to share equitably political power and have respect for Others cherished values, when history even in our own time demonstrates so clearly these words will as they always have been in the past be proved to be totally untrue.

You cannot force Other to convert because as the Qur'an (Muhammad Man) points out this is Gods job but you can impose 'grievous harm' or 'severest penalty' or if Other are lucky subservience to an inequitable tax regime and restriction upon ideological practice - not much of a choice really is it. And what happens to those who are outside the two 'allowable' religions Christianity and Judaism? Such as Atheists etc., I believe Islam determines them Hypocrites what happens to Hypocrites - tea and biscuits?

Islam determines Muslims must not kill other Muslims this is wrong. Has some significant Other been left out of this protective determination? This has no affect? Has not does not inform Muslim behaviour?
Cultural 'education' (Cultural Foundation Codex) the core problem and solution.

A significant change has come from the recent stated views of two Western political leaders regards 'Religion' as a driver of 'major schism' rather than a rote proclamation such as  David Cameron – "Islam Is Peaceful and Compatible with Democracy" and Hillary Clinton "The suggestion that faithful Muslims cannot thrive in a democracy is insulting, dangerous and wrong,".

Egypt, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, Libya, Turkey, Iran, London, Boston, Bali, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, Sudan, Kenya, Nigeria, Somalia,... appear to statistically rationally determine David Cameron and Hillary Clinton's views as so false as to be incredulous.

Yet Hillary Clinton by courtesy of Wiki leaks revealed just the opposite in secret cables.

"In a December 2009 cable, leaked by WikiLeaks in 2010, then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton confirmed that Saudi Arabia remained a "critical financial base" for terrorism and that Riyadh "has taken only limited action" to stop the flow of funds to the Taliban and other such groups."

"..the kingdom's immense oil wealth has been used to underwrite the export of an extreme, intolerant and violent version of Islam preached by its Wahhabi clerics.

Go anywhere in the world--from Germany to Indonesia--and you'll find Islamic centers flush with Saudi money, spouting intolerance and hate. In 2007, Stuart Levey, then a top Treasury official, told ABC News, "If I could snap my fingers and cut off the funding from one country, it would be Saudi Arabia."


How is it, it can be determined "export of an extreme, intolerant and violent version of Islam" is occurring from the religious center of Islam, Sunni Saudi Arabia, (A study conducted by the Pew Research Center in 2010 and released January 2011 found that there are 1.62 billion Muslims around the world, and it is estimated that the Sunni population is between 75% and 90%) that this 'version' does not represent the 'true' nature of Islam? It is the same as claiming '.the Papal States immense wealth has been used to underwrite the export of an extreme, intolerant and violent version of Christianity preached by its Catholic clerics.' And '. Rome remained a "critical financial base" for terrorism'.

Saudi Arabia is the source in time and space of the 'true' Islam since the seventh century unbroken, the (Sunni Muslims representing 75%-90% of all Muslims) it is from where Mohammad and his ethical construct of Other originated. It is to where the faithful Muslim returns en masse. If Saudi Arabia's Sunni version of Islam is so 'extreme, intolerant and violent' why is it accepted at all if it is claimed to be so unconnected to the 'true' Islam? It has to be connected ethically otherwise it could be clearly shown to be unconnected and there would be no adherents external to Sunni Saudi Arabia- yet alas there are.

"In his interview with FRANCE 24, Maliki said Saudi Arabia and Qatar were seeking to destabilise Iraq by supporting terrorist groups and providing them with financial support.

Maliki, an Iraqi Shiite politician, said the two Sunni majority Gulf countries were also “supporting terrorism” in Syria and “around the world”."

"Saudi Arabia has declared the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization and banned it and other organizations effective from March 8, according to an Interior Ministry statement.

The ministry issued a list of banned organizations that includes the ‘Saudi Hezbollah’ movement, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, the Al-Nusra Front, Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, Al-Qaeda in Yemen, Al-Qaeda in Iraq, and the Houthis in Yemen, the Saudi Press Agency reported, quoting the ministry."

KSA (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia) tightens noose on Brotherhood terrorism JEDDAH: ARAB NEWS Published — Saturday 8 March 2014

Saudis Alert to Enemies on Both Sides of Iraq Schism By Glen Carey Jul 8, 2014 3:10 AM ET

The Saudi are justified to believe themselves subject to Islamophobia? Or is it the reverse? This appears to me to be another Muslim of one major sub-class determining another major sub-class of Muslims are terrorizing them. Now which side is suffering from Islamophobia? Which side has an unjustified fear, in fact a mental illness in determining the other Muslim side a clear threat to their survival, peace and security?

The Sunni Saudi Muslims are Moderates? Then what about the other side of the Islamic coin, the Shiite Muslims are not informing terror somewhere on the globe even in Iraq itself? The Shiite Iraqi Muslims are the Moderates? Unjustified even irrational fear of what fellow Muslims can and will do?

This is exactly the same fear Other has regards various Muslim sects yet it is determined a mental illness, Muslims can justifiably fear each other yet Other cannot rationally fear Muslims as a whole as Muslims clearly fear each other, unless Other wish to be determined an Islamophobe?

"For months, the area has been terrorized by raids blamed on semi-nomadic Fulani herders attacking Hausa farmers. Both are Muslim.

Most Fulani—related violence in Nigeria is concentrated around central Plateau state, where Muslim herders are pitted against Christian farmers. Thousands have been killed in recent years."

 14 Mar.2014, Nigerian Tribune Hassan Ibrahim and Johnson Babajide with Agency Report

If this Muslim terror and schism was confined simply between tribes in time and space one may argue this is tribal not ideological but as Muslim attacks against Other are a global phenomenon which recognise no Nation nor cultural border therefore such an argument is void.

With Islam the nature of the means by which every individual 'true' Muslim have been given a God derived ability as detailed in the Quran to determine Other, means each in turn Other and Muslim adherent alike, are justifiably subject to the Quran genocide construct for 'grievous harm' and 'severest penalty'. We are not talking about fringe groups enabling terror and major schism, either through direct funding and/or refusal to institute appropriate cultural blockers to terror we are talking about Nation States from Saudi Arabia to Indonesia (even in Indonesia Government Ministers given tacit public support for extremist Islamic organisations).

But truth as they say will out, Obama I believe has been forced (I assume because it is so obvious) to make two interconnecting statements and politically he had to make the first to make the second. For Obama could not be seen as being prejudiced against a particular religion.  This would have been planned long before Obama stepped on his Air-Force 1 to go to Ireland and Africa to make the relevant speeches.

In Ireland: "OBAMA OFFENDS IN IRELAND, SAYS CATHOLIC AND PROTESTANT SCHOOLS CAN ENCOURAGE 'FEAR' AND 'DIVISION'"

In Africa: "UNITED States’ President, Barrack Obama, on Saturday, linked growing terrorism in Africa to bad governance but insisted that, "in the case of the Boko Haram sect, there is (also) the religious rationale for what they are doing."

It is a clear recognition by Obama 'religion' as with 'secular' codex can and does inform major schism and keeping silent is not an option if you really are interested in peace and Harmony in the long run. Thinking for the sake of preserving sacred cows 'Freedom of Religion' and 'Cultural relativism-We all in essence suffer from sociocentric bias so we must not judge Other cultures harshly and if you do so your suffering from a mental illness - phobia." will not stop major schism in fact it enables it to occur.

It is not 'quantum physics' Kublai Khan (1215 – 1294) according to Marco Polo had no doubt Islamic/Muslim foundation text (doctrine) enabled atrocities by Muslims against Other without any sense of guilt.

As
"Mr Blair said: "There is not a problem with Muslims in general. Most in Britain will be horrified at Lee Rigby's murder." the question for humanity is as with the Nazi at what point does Humanity act before or after the inevitable (statistically given scientific evidence) major schism occurs. There comes a time when it is too late, as many empires, cultures and societies have found to their terrible cost.

When will the apologists, as there were countless for the Nazi, as there are for Islam stop putting their ethical nihilistic jackboot on the throat of reason, which they simultaneously proclaim as their domain, and finally accept 'Critical Thinking' will not deliver peace and harmony when you are dealing with an irrational construct as the deductive base for dialogue - it is simply not going to happen - at the edges yes (but the cultural 'spectrum' dictates this will be the case so one must not take any joy from such a state) - to utilise this as proof the culture as a whole in time and space is amenable to notions of a pluralistic society which promotes equality of opportunity of power and flourishing for all inclusive of women is a dangerous fallacy.

The key disagreement as I perceive is no longer, as Tony Blair said with the view there is or is not an inherent ‘problem with Islam', that is statistically verifiable on many societal levels, one simply has to reflect on the dollars and cents the world is currently spending on security services to protect ourselves and even adherents themselves from the actions Islam as a codex informs. If there was no cultural risk from Muslims, reflect what is the probability the amount of resources now assigned to the task would exist.

The key disagreement is can, given the Islamic codex is it possible to change the Islamic codex itself to such a degree it will inform a Muslim 'spectrum' which no longer informs 'major schism' and equal status for women across that spectrum, Ed Husain and Razi Azmi believe it can be. Razi Azmi believes given the 'submission' of Christianity to the notions of pluralism and equality it is possible - I disagree.

I believe it is impossible for the Islamic codex to be changed or as Ed Husain proposes not changed but reinterpreted, because the Islam codex is so fundamentally riven with derogatory construct of Other and integral to its core benefit to Men is the submission of women to Mans (Muslim Mans) will.

Both the extensive core constructs of Other (as proving the veracity of belief and rewards in relative contrast to what is in store for Other on earth and in hell for not being a 'true believer) the necessary outcome the justified 'willing' subservience of Other to Muslims, and women being sexually and materially subject to Man Muslim, as well as the proscribed reinforcement Islamic societal mechanisms for enforcing these beliefs as true - the psychological/time costs in aligning to these enforcement mechanisms and therefore psychological need to justify such costs as rational simply makes in my view Islam completely beyond redemption for it does not contain any ethical codex blockers regards Other which are so qualified as to cancel out their effect not only logically but also on the ground in space and time.

So Razi Azmi's view Islam can submit to the rational as Christianity has is a false hope because of the Islamic codex messianic templates of justified violence against Other inherent in Mohammad's actions (of being directly involved in the slaughter of Other and joking around when informed of the murder of those who ridiculed him) as opposed to Jesus' behaviour, as well as the complete absence of Islamic standalone unqualified ethics which are supportive of Other which exist in the New Testament.

Islam needs to be removed from informing the 'spectrum' of cultural war and subjugation of women it consistently constantly actions against Other and women.


How do you go about it?

You must attempt this non-violently otherwise what’s the point you simply try and suppress a genocide construct with another, but I am not sure cultures of genocide constructs of Other take any notice of such niceties. Tony Blair said it would not be easy I agree. I expect there is going to be violence if you keep silent or you speak up.

Firstly you do the math, research to establish if there is a cultural link - i.e. if humanity should be much more concerned in time and space regards a culture as a whole rather than individuals.

Such research needs to be based across cultures secular and religious - Islam should not be simply the focus as Islam is not the only genocidal construct (my perception doing the rounds)

Sociological and psychological research on the link between foundation codex (genetics, (con) textual constructs, exemplar-leadership (messianic) templates) construct of Other inclusive of women, relative individual, group and State responses.

Development of prejudice age 0-, relative ability for State to change once set.

Statistics on growth of extremism with cultural population growth which enables greater scope for setting feedback mechanisms, -growing numbers relatively as elsewhere of enforcers via fundamentalist groups.

Establish if it really matters under a 'freedom' democratic construct or not - Indonesian experience would say no (but needs to be confirmed)

State by State analysis current an historic of growth of Muslim population and correlation with:

·         cross and inter cultural violence,
·         exclusionary statements regards Other (i.e. Sydney Mosque fatwa against Christmas) and women which may flag negative ethical movement.
  • violent statements regards Other
  • public/private enforcement of Islamic norms non-violent/violent. i.e. attacks in streets/homes against Muslim women and men to enforce adherence.
  • terror actions successful and thwarted
  • longitudinal surveys of inter-cultural views
  • growth in extremist organisations /groups/ individuals (linkages back through time and space)
  • growth in Muslim terror organisations /groups/ individuals (linkages back through time and space)
  • growth in Muslim teaching organisations/ schools/ correlated to fundamentalist views and action.
  • diminished of rights of Other and women.
  • cultural visibility of women's subservience to Man-linkages to rise in fundamentalism and terrorist related activities, and diminished political rights of Other and women - i.e. is such growing visibility rather than an indication of growing 'Freedom' quite the reverse in reality.
  • calls for Other and women to accept Islamic law to be the basis for Muslim law.
  • increased statements for women to be pure otherwise they deserve what they get (meat), or are the actual cause of natural disasters
  • increasing calls for inclusion of cultural laws into the societal legal framework and connection to increasing fundamentalism and terrorist related activities.
  • no go zones for Other and/or women,
  • Muslim clusters numbers and size linked to socioeconomic and defined Islamic indoctrination levels
  • growth in dogma centric criminal gangs linked to extremist groups
  • definition changes over time of median notion of Liberal/Moderate/Fundamentalist/ Extremist/Terrorist/ 'True believer'
  • work has been done on percentage population required to support insurgency (relative external support with globalization) if this is appearing related to population growth.
  • what historically and currently constitutes a 'True believer' and what this means for the status of Other and women in particular.
  • examine the rise of the 'Right' as this will be a red flag the current political constructs are failing to rationally deal with the cause cultural foundation codex and the 'Right' inevitably rises with increasing societal support to protect what they see as 'cherished values' because cultural relativist in seeking to maintain Peace at any cost, Peace is the cost. 
  •  Develop research particularly the methodology of linking cultural codex (textual and exemplar (messianic) templates) 'rational' model to establish reflected relative levels of status and power for cultural altruistic enforcers authenticity, authority  within changing context as this will establish if indeed there is such a thing as Is/Not Islam. For it enables firstly a test for if the dualism of Is/Not can in fact exist and why and also the relative authenticity and authority of Is and Not (if one can even define Is or Not in the first place). It will establish how and why the Islamic/Muslim cultural behavioral variance changes over time and space i.e. appearance of Islamic schools, mosques, demands for acceptance of Sharia law, the link between Lakemba Sydney Australia jihad again Christmas, increasing wearing of Muslim women cultural clothing and the relative severity of  (for Muslim women by wearing such cloths deem themselves cultural altruist enforcers), citizens being murdered in the streets, and increasing development of terror cells of greater numbers targeting internal and external Other.  In other words the resource and political thresholds at which the Islamic/Muslim culture will inform terror.

    Violence begets counter violence in equal measure or worse. Simply holding hands prancing around the camp fires with moderate liberals and cups of tea, inhibit communications and create martyrs on both sides simply delays the inevitable genocide in both directions.

    Cultural relativist have to be removed from political power and the quicker the better.

    The fact the Right is actually rising is proof you are failing in your current strategy you are not facing the reality cultures be they religious or secular can be dangerous entities 'Freedom of Religion' is simply enabling schism not preventing it.

    The Right rises to face off against what is societally perceived as exactly the same construct in the opposite direction- the trouble is neither side accepts they are the cause of the resultant terror in this case Islam/Muslims and the Right facing it, each determines they are the pristine their ethical values 'good' rather than 'evil'.

    My view is the Right would not rise if Islam/Muslims did not inherently have the same attributes of repression and violence. You want to stop the Right rising remove the cause do not play around with the symptoms and think you are achieving anything. Cultural movements are seen over hundreds of years, what may appear to be a success measured in months or a few years is an illusion/delusion.
"..but the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts". I doubt that he was referring to writing on religion, though this might warrant his strictures today."

  • Logicians, linguists and psychologists purposefully go through the Quran and Mein Kampf and construct Other are they the same in both texts (if they are explain why the cultural outcomes will be different), are the ethical blockers that inform a notion of Islam of peace actually able to be logically derived without being a self-serving conscience assuaging device.
  • Logicians, linguists and psychologists purposefully go through the the Quran and construct women does it inform a 'Free State' of equality of power and access to a flourishing life in comparison to Muslim Man are the notions of Islam informing women liberation actually able to be logically derived without being a self-serving conscience assuaging device.
A slave may enjoy being a slave but does this mean the rest of us have to enjoy the spectacle of the public display of such a heinous state of subservience to master Man in our Public Square.

Participants at the annual conference of radical Muslim group Hizb ut-Tahrir at Lidcombe, in Sydney's west, yesterday (November 17, 2013). Picture: Ross Schultz Source: The Australian

For those who did, "punishment will come and seize you at a time you never expected"

Muslims told to turn their backs on ASIO EAN HIGGINS THE AUSTRALIAN NOVEMBER 18, 2013 12:00AM
  • The Muslim veil, hijab, niqab and burqa are the outward political signs of Muslims women’s subjugation to Muslim Mans Control, Muslim Mans Ownership, and Muslim Mans Power. These states of dress I believe will be found through research to inform diminished states of relative liberty, equality and justice of Muslim women to Muslim Men within a Muslim community and also inform outward signs of the degree 'major schism' is under way in any pluralistic society.
  • Far from being a 'good' from my perspective such states inform 'evil' particularly for the status of women and must be removed from the Public Square.
  • It appears to me a possible connection exists between the relative subservience of women, degree of textual construct, public displays of subservience to Man and a correlation to cultural growth of fundamentalism, feeding into Muslim violence internal/external, given these varying degrees of public displays of Muslim women’s subservience within any society - I have a feeling there is going to be a more than significant connection between the relative degree of publicly displayed subservience and attempted/actual violence against Other.
  • It is important to determine how true wearing the Muslim veil, hijab, niqab and burqa is a 'free choice' devoid of cultural pressure to conform and the various psychological states and relative power states each relatively inform for women - also the impact on the relative level of acceptance of the subjugation of women and lessening of respect for women's equality which may be associated with such states and if the feminist construct and derived relative power of women means such depictions of subservience should be banned from the Public Square to prevent new citizens from believing such a state is acceptable.

    "“You know, I wasn’t always wearing the hijab. At first I was harassed every time I went out, sometimes it was awful and just too much to bear. Then I wore the hijab and thought now that I’m a bit covered and more modest in the way I dressed, harassment would stop or at least diminish, but it didn’t. Then, I felt all guilty about it and was wondering maybe it’s me, maybe I’m not well covered and maybe I’m still a source of “fitna” and I felt very bad about it. I decided to wear the full niqab, no more colors (very dark colors, mostly black), and no more clothes that shows the figure.  I felt and still feel very good and at peace with my decision, but I would lie if I say that harassment stopped because it didn’t. I still get the harassing gazes and the harassing words about my eyes (though my face is covered). But at least, I feel that it’s not my fault.”"  Sexual harassment in Moroccan streets, who is to blame? Thursday 14 February 2013 - 22:42 Moroccan World News


  • So completely opposite to the cultural relativist and freedom of religion paradigm of ‘Freedom’ wearing the veil, hijab, niqab and burqa, it is my view research will find not only that the relative numbers of these garments worn, interconnected to garment type of political public displays of affiliation to Islam will be a reliable gauge and reflective of major schism in train in any society and measure of the attempted and successful subjugation of Other and women, but will also find wearing such garments are not really a ‘free choice’ at all. A price women have to pay, public displays of submission to Man’s determination, to stay safe and be accepted as a 'true believer'.
  • No cultural pressure to conform? If this was truly the case statistically Other would be wearing the same garments in the same proportion - are they? Therefore? It is a lie.
  • An important question is there a cultural link between levels of violence internal/external (be it against Other and/or women) and a cultures construct of women. If this can be statistically verified by comparing the ethical construct in codex and/or codex informed pressure for women to mark themselves separate from Men this may provide the proof required to clear such constructs from the Public Square (this is not only a Muslim question). 
This appears on the streets and what is right beside it - peace and security?
Husband of woman in burka case arrested ANTHONY KLAN THE AUSTRALIAN DECEMBER 04, 2013 12:00AM

"THREE years ago Carnita Matthews made headlines for refusing to remove her burka after she was pulled over by NSW police, in a move that sparked new laws.

Yesterday it was her husband, Hamdi Alqudsi, in the spotlight after he and another man were arrested for allegedly recruiting fighters to train and fight with al-Qa'ida affiliates in Syria."

The Muslim veil, hijab, niqab and burqa appearing in any pluralistic society’s streets are the outward signs of cultural schism, not cultural cohesion and in non-pluralistic streets a sign Other and women have been crushed. You seriously believe in peace and a flourishing life particularly for women and you allow this Islamic cultural construct anywhere near the Public Square you will have neither.

"Most include a few words, for example: "I loathe the hijab. I too like the feel of the sun and the wind on my hair. Is this a big sin?"
....
Ever since the Islamic Revolution 35 years ago, it has been illegal for a woman to leave the house without wearing a headscarf. The punishment ranges from a fine to imprisonment. "My hair was like a hostage to the government," says Masih Alinejad, an Iranian political journalist who lives in the UK and who set up the Facebook page. "The government still has a lot of hostages," she adds."

Freedom of choice? All you need is just one culturally derived action to prove the notion of women are Free to choose as false to determine the argument Islam enables Free choice as false because you cannot have in the same time and space Tyranny and Liberty and claim Tyranny does not exist. Islam either informs Tyranny or Liberty it cannot inform both at the same time and be determined as informing Liberty. It is the same as determining a cobra's tail is non-venomous therefore the cobra is non-venomous.

You may determine your culture as liberal moderate and surround yourself with the same but do not think in the end you yourself nor your friends will not in the end conform to cultural authority and participate in actions at this point of time you would abhor. I advise you read up on Milgrams experiment.

There comes a time when it is too late. When saying there are only a ‘handful’ of extremists and we are mostly a liberal moderate culture loses all meaning particularly for Other and in this case for women as well. You have ignored a truth as with outliers in statistics the extremists ‘handful’ have a disproportionate effect on the ethical cultural mean, have you not seen this before in other cultures? The Islamic Defenders Front (Indonesian: Front Pembela Islam/FPI) a socio-religious organization group in Indonesia, notorious for hate crimes and violence is not having an affect now in Indonesia out of all proportion to its perceived numbers? FPI is not being given tacit support from Indonesian Government Ministers and influencing politicians in the Indonesian Provence's as well, to follow their direction - or else?

Also you hide from yourself a terrible truth your own cultural foundation codex actually justifies and authorizes the very existence of these extremist groups – there is no ethical schism between you and the extremists as has been found in Indonesian research on the supposed quantum leap between Islamic fundamentalist and terrorist.

Societies should be allowed to choose, based on scientifically derived evidence, whether or not a culture is to be allowed into the Public Square, particularly cultures whose codex contains a genocide construct of Other and subjugation of women thrown in.

If the analysis indicates a strong correlation between growth numbers of a culture or derived from a culture violence, push for or actual political diminution of rights of Other particularly women then I believe other cultures who determine violence is unacceptable and the diminution of political rights of all inclusive of women have to be enhanced and protected have a right to act. Why? Because my view ignoring in space and time such genocide constructs is a mistake - they will not simply disappear under the weight of the so obvious benefits of togetherness. Major schism will be inevitable as Tony Blair rightly pointed out.

Then once established the probability of schism is as is reflected on the ground historically and currently is very high and it is scientifically verified the Islamic cultural foundation codex means having Muslims anywhere near the Public Square ensures schism is inevitable in time and space:
1.     Remove all institutional support, political, educational, for cultures defined as containing genocide constructs and advancing diminution of Other and women's rights.
2.     Make sure new generations of citizens are not exposed to genocide constructs.
3.     Ban public displays of affiliation as you would for any genocide construct that is set to destabilize and terrorize your societies.
4.     Support ongoing research and researchers into culturally derived schism emanating from culture codex and set up the legal and enforcement frameworks to remove such codex from the Public Square.
5.     Remove the cultural entity from any control or influence of entities which may provide any financial and organisational support.
6. Confiscate all assets and prevent new assets from being obtained which would enable the culture to be able to sustain itself and promote its political agenda. Particularly control of charities, health services and other cultural services which are utilised to maintain cultural hold and means of sustaining and promoting cultural aims. Money is power from whatever source it comes from or goes to. Under a genocide construct the so called charity is a means to an end not the end itself. And will be invariably directed to assist like-minded if not in the main totally.

Yes it moves away from the cultural relativist ethical nihilist paradigm if we all hold hands everything is going to be OK. Has it worked, is it working is the security risk diminishing or increasing?

The argument is do nothing as it will only be the actual cause of schism. I believe all this does is enable a major schism in time to occur which fails to recognize the real cause as specific cultural construct of Other and simply leads to a cultural genocide in both directions. Where we see fascist constructs on both sides trying to negate each other out.

I believe humanity has to recognize the root cause of internal/external cultural violence are our cultural foundation codex and the ever present existence of liberal moderates simply makes no difference to the endgame. The point is to scientifically determine what are the key constructs in codex which will inevitably inform 'major schism' over time and be honest about this otherwise humanity simply lurches from one genocide to the next.

If seeking security, harmony and a flourishing life One should not judge a person, a community, a Nation by the colour of their skin, the level of their intellect nor their physical dexterity but One must certainly judge them by the character of ALL their "insulting, dangerous, and wrong" cultural foundation codex regards Other, particularly as it relates to the status of women relative to men. For only after complete examination by oneself (not taking anyone else’s subjective word for it) of the cultural Foundation codex regards Other and Women, and ignoring demonstrative pious claims utilizing select abridged versions of the cultural Foundation codex to hide the truth, will you be able to conclude such a person, such a community, or such a Nation will eventually cause you more harm than good and is really not worth having anything to do with, and must be excluded from the Public Square for the sake of attaining security, harmony and a flourishing life.

Future Bias: If it is true Islam is a culture which informs peace why is it in time and space 'danger' and 'hate' informs the ultimate nature of Islam/Muslim culture wherever it resides? As pointed out - 19 years ago was security, hate and danger less, is there a connection between the numbers of any culture and the capacity to enforce the move to the cultural foundation codex norm of the 'true believer' and enable the full realisation of the 'spectrum' of cultural behaviour inclusive of terror (cultural war) and subjugation of women?

Muslim convert says ‘Accepting Islam was very easy’ Australian scholar: (Ahlul Bayt News Agency) Date: 2013/09/08 - 23:07

"Q: What problems at the moment Muslim population wrestling with in Australia?

A: We actually have problems with Wahhabis at the moment. Wahhabis are very much in control. We have many problems with them. They are too dangerous for Sunni and Shia brothers. Their ideology I mean, they say we are all from the Sunni. They taking a way the Sunni sects, they dismiss Hanafi, Hambeli and Maleki. They dismiss it. And they say we should be together, Sunni. Through such way they try to teach you their ideology. B the first thing in their ideology is to hate Shia and this is the danger.

Q: Can you tell us a gist of what you tackle and highlight in your article?

A: What I just said was what was happening in Australia. There are a lot of new Muslims in Australia. There is a growth of Islam in Australia. But the fact that, one the Wahhabis have a lot of control. So, 19 years before, there was a lot of unity between Shia and Sunni. But because of the Wahhabism now it’s very separate like Sunni won’t come to Shia communities anymore because they are taught that we are like something else."

What therefore is the Future? Should not citizens have a choice which culture it interacts with given statistically scientifically it can be determined (proved beyond reasonable doubt) having Islam/Muslims anywhere near the Public Square, despite the ever present so called liberal/moderates, is a tragedy in the making? Have we not the right to have societies where fellow citizens are not intent on destroying our cherished values and very lives?

Do you understand the ethical basis for the fatwa against Christmas proclaimed from a Sydney Mosque and what such ethics actually informs for the future - Doing nothing an option?

Cleric preaching hate August 23, 2013, 6:18 pm David Eccleston Today Tonight
"A video has shown an Australian Muslim cleric preaching to his followers a 45-minute sermon of hatred towards Australians.

Sheikh Sharif Hussein's provocative sermon has surfaced online, calling for non-Muslims to be exterminated."

Eradicating radical Islam July 3, 2013, 6:18 pm James Thomas Today Tonight
Mr Ali has been recorded saying that over the course of seven years he had identified 240 'radicals Islamists' within his community (Australian) centre, 120 of whom continue to have extremist views and are seen to potentially be on a path to "extreme acts".
Mr Nawaz, who says he understands extreme Islamist groups because he was once a true believer, thinks Mr Ali's admission is a serious concern."

Terrorists say jump, US says how high? Peter Hartcher Sydney Morning Herald August 13, 2013

"Islamist jihadi violence didn't start in 2002. It arrived in Indonesia in 1803. ...

A Predicament of the Mainstream By HUMA YUSUF September 27, 2013
"Religious intolerance is no longer the preserve of extremist groups in Pakistan. It is endemic throughout the country."

Australian Muslims accused of attacking US Muslims in Saudi Arabia Nick O'Malley Sydney Morning Herald Date October 23, 2013

"..one of the members of the American group was strangled until his face turned blue and that women in the group were threatened with rape, according to witnesses to the attack that they say took place on October 16.
According to American Shiite cleric Mothafar al-Qazwini, the group was confronted by as many as 200 men they later learned to be Australians belonging to a Sunni sub-group known as Salafis."

Muslims told to turn their backs on ASIO EAN HIGGINS THE AUSTRALIAN NOVEMBER 18, 2013 12:00AM
"HUNDREDS of Muslims attending a community meeting in western Sydney were warned yesterday that they should refuse to co-operate with Australian governments and their agencies, including ASIO and the federal police....

Hizb ut-Tahrir, which operates internationally, calls for the creation of a world caliphate to rule all Muslims according to traditional principles and sharia.....
.........
For those who did, "punishment will come and seize you at a time you never expected"."

Muslims urged to turn back on country EAN HIGGINS THE AUSTRALIAN NOVEMBER 23, 2013 12:00AM

"This maintenance of a separate identity within Australia will be a precursor to a big event that will happen at some yet-to-be-defined time. Then the Muslim community in Australia will become part of a global caliphate, governed not by Australian politicians but its own Muslim leaders, and answerable not to Australian law but sharia."

Crackdown on Aussie jihad in Syria to spread PAUL MALEY AND DAN BOX THE AUSTRALIAN DECEMBER 04, 2013 12:00AM

"He spent over a year in Syria, where he seems to have joined the ranks of combatant groups, jihadist terrorist groups."  

"The profile of the French Muslim- a veteran of the Syrian conflict- suspected of carrying out the Background of Brussels suspect confirms West's worst fears"
"Jewish Museum attack follows a familiar pattern." By Amos Harel Jun. 2, 2014 2:09 AM

If an outcome 'terror' is inevitably derived from a known series of events surely the nature of those events justifies severe judicial societal penalty being applied to prevent such acts being devoid of penalty - and therefore no impediment to growing terror.

I believe it is time to institute laws which enable the revoking of citizenship of any person involved in foreign armed conflicts, either in front line or support roles, other than activity specifically authorized by the State. The decision to revoke citizenship based on a security service recommendation and overseen by State legislature review. If it is ascertained by security services an individual citizen is participating in the organisation of fighters for or directly in unauthorized foreign armed conflict they must have their citizenship revoked. And if still in the Nation to which their citizenship pertains be deported as quickly as possible to a Nation which would appreciate their cultural mindset. Immigrants signing a pledge not to be involved in such activities with the penalty the cancellation of citizenship.

Enabling citizens to be trained in tools of terror and allowing them to return from whatever side is not a ‘good’.

Citizens should be ‘Free’ to decide? And when they get back what happens?

Freedom to do What, To Whom, For Whose Benefit?

Muslim arrests to 'silence' community EAN HIGGINS THE AUSTRALIAN DECEMBER 04, 2013 12:00AM
"Hizb ut-Tahrir, an international organisation dedicated to the creation of a global caliphate to rule all Muslims around the world.."

"Hizb ut-Tahrir has run an active media and public forum campaign urging Australian Muslims to be cautious of co-operating with Australian authorities, or taking on mainstream Australian values."

"The men were allegedly sent to fight with the terrorist group Jabhat al-Nusra, also known as the al-Nusra Front, and affiliates of al-Qa'ida."
December 5, 2013 - 3:06PM

"Forty worshippers have witnessed bloodshed at a Melbourne mosque after an agitated man pulled a knife and stabbed three elderly men, leaving one dead."

Next generation of jihadi family joins Syrian war MARK SCHLIEBS THE AUSTRALIAN JANUARY 28, 2014 12:00AM

A bush hideaway has become the focus of a counterterrorism investigation amid fears it was used by Khaled Sharrouf YONI BASHAN STATE POLITICAL REPORTER THE SUNDAY TELEGRAPH FEBRUARY 15, 2014 10:00PM

Australian extremists killed in US Predator drone strike in Yemen News.com.au 28 MINUTES AGO APRIL 16, 2014 6:47AM

"Posting on Facebook on Monday night, Shaheed, who has had his account shut down numerous times, wrote: “Rolling out, make heaps of dua its gonna be a big one In’sha’allah.’’

The comments generated more than 30 “likes’’ and seven comments. One asked, “Does that mean ur goin on an op?’’ prompting the reply, “Yeah, In’sha’allah’’. Shaheed provided no details of what the “op’’ was."

Aussie jihadi in Iraq conflict PAUL MALEY AND MARK SCHLIEBS THE AUSTRALIAN JUNE 19, 2014 12:00AM

"A MUSLIM leader has called for Hizb ut-Tahrir to be banned in Australia, as exasperation within the community grows over the extremist group and its spokesman Uthman Badar for drawing Islam into another “stereotypical debate”.
"Hizb ut-Tahrir extremists should be banned in Australia: Muslim leader" THE AUSTRALIAN JUNE 27, 2014 12:00AM By Rick Morton Social Affairs Reporter Sydney

It is statistically impossible for any Muslim leader to now claim Hizb ut-Tahrir are extremists, outliers outside a consistent constant 'true' Muslim Behavioural variance. The actions of violence and subjugation or espousing of the same by Muslims not Mickey Mouse supporters happens so often and at such hierarchy levels of leadership of 'groups' not just individual statements that it is obscene in its audacity in face of the bloody reality.
"Khaled Sharrouf fired off the tweets on July 14 from the Middle East
The Sydney resident fled Australia on his brother's passport in December
He tweeted: 'I love to slaughter [Australians]' and called the AFP 'cowards'
It came just before it was revealed 40-50 extremists were living in Australia"
By LOUISE CHEER Daily Mail PUBLISHED: 01:40 AEST, 17 July 2014

"AN Islamic State fighter known only as Abu Bakr has become the second Australian to carry out a suicide bombing in Syria and Iraq, killing five people in a Shia-dominated district near the centre of Baghdad."
Second Aussie suicide bomber kills five near Baghdad MARK SCHLIEBS AND PAUL MALEY THE AUSTRALIAN JULY 19, 2014 12:00AM

"KHALED Sharrouf, the con­victed terrorist who in recent weeks has tweeted a string of atrocities that he and fellow ­jihadis have committed in Syria and Iraq, claims a second Australian has become a suicide bomber."
Second Australian in suicide attack PAUL MALEY AND MARK SCHLIEBS THE AUSTRALIAN JULY 26, 2014 12:00AM

"KHALED Sharrouf, the con­victed terrorist who in recent weeks has tweeted a string of atrocities that he and fellow ­jihadis have committed in Syria and Iraq", "con­victed terrorist"?

When will the pathological altruist Western policy makers basing their decisions upon Freedom of Religion and multiculturalism realise, Islam is at its core codex bent upon the destruction of Other and once power is attained as we see constantly across history Liberty and Equality are destroyed?

Freeing these Muslim convicted terrorists without determining they have 'reformed' is the same as releasing recidivist paedophiles out into our streets and therefore Muslim convicted terrorists must be treated in the same way.

This is cultural WAR you idiots not just ordinary societal crime - it is cultural derived behavioural pathology. You either Change the Architect and Builder or you will have repeat terror. It is not a question of if.

"The images show a beaming Elomar holding the decapitated heads of two Syrian soldiers who appear to have been killed during, or after, the fighting around Raqqa, which has seen some of the bloodiest fighting of the war."
Aussie terrorists send out warning by Mitchell Nadin, Paul Maley, THE AUSTRALIAN JULY 30, 2014

"Australia's terrorism threat level remains at medium - meaning an event "is likely and could occur."
"
Anti-terror laws crucial: ASIO BY ANDREW DRUMMOND AAP AUGUST 08, 2014 8:06PM

It is appalling when looking back over the years of the clear connection between Freedom of Religion/Cultural relativism enabling a culture such as Islam with a genocide construct access to the Public Square being the cause of the major schism societies across the world are experiencing. Rather than enabling flourishing societies what has Freedom of Religion/Cultural relativism delivered in reality?

How a regular suburban kid put his faith in a killer cult THE AUSTRALIAN AUGUST 09, 2014 12:00AM

What I ask is the difference between the 'regular suburban kid' from one culture and the 'regular suburban kid' from another culture which enables one to stand consistently and constantly against terror and one stand consistently and constantly for it? The cultural codex of one relative to the other. One contains a genocidal construct of Other the other cultural codex does not.

Change the architect and builder or change nothing.

"Mr Moroney said that the conspirators in the Pendennis plot knew the police were watching them.

Police tried repeatedly to disrupt the group’s plans — arresting them for minor offences, tapping their phones, even approaching them directly.

But still they went ahead."
Can AFP succeed where a dad’s love failed? THE AUSTRALIAN AUGUST 09, 2014 12:00AM

No the AFP cannot 'succeed' and the 'dad’s love failed' because the dad did not understand 'love' to enable ones children to avoid being terrorists is not to culturally educate them under the very codex which enables it to consistently constantly occur within the cultures behavioural variance and be regarded within that Islamic/Muslim behavioural variance as a good.

“I know how they think. I know how they fight. There is no compromise possible.

“These long wars require long commitment to outlast radical ideas and provide viable, meaningful alternatives which require a whole-of-government response, rather than assuming the military can or should do it all.’’
We’ll fight radical Islam for 100 years, says ex-army head Peter Leahy THE AUSTRALIAN AUGUST 09, 2014 12:00 AM

It does not take a genius to know how they think, it is how they get to think what they think that really matters. If you cannot fight and destroy the latter in the Public Square all that happens is you are being 'fought' by the Muslim culture, your actions be that you personally perceive them as pre-emptive or not they will always be reactive. You are dealing with symptoms not the cause.

To
"provide viable, meaningful alternative" when the major part of what is determined 'sacred' text and exemplar (messianic) template behaviour comprises the Islamic cultural codex which supports a genocide construct of Other really is a cultural relativist absurdity masquerading as a viable public policy. This again is a fallacious and totally unjustifiable view there can be a 'true' Islamic/Muslim behavioural variance without terror, which means a significant portion of the Islamic codex would have to be universally accepted by Muslims as being necessary for deletion along with Mohammad as an exemplar (messianic) template - can anyone seriously believe this can happen.

Therefore the 'truth' has to be faced if you cannot have Islam in time and space without the terror and major schism why is it being allowed within the Public Square at very great cost to Other? Is one Childs life really worth the price? You really think so?

Aussie trio align with IS fighters MARK SCHLIEBS THE AUSTRALIAN AUGUST 30, 2014 12:00AM

Sydney jihadist named commander of Iraqi Islamic State unit THE AUSTRALIAN, Paul Maley, SEPTEMBER 01, 2014 12:00AM

"Karroum's death in a hail of bullets in Syria was a world away from the life of the beach-loving teenager who grew up in a wealthy family on the Gold Coast and went to a local Anglican girl's school.

"She was beautiful," said her grieving father Mohammed Karroum.

"We had a house, a waterfront house, and she used to invite her friends and I used to make barbecues for them, barbecues, and she would be swimming, dancing.

"She goes to the nightclub with her sister, just having a good time like any ordinary girl."

Karroum's life took a major turn in 2011 when she moved with her older sister to the suburb of Liverpool in Sydney's west to be closer to their Muslim relatives.

There, the sisters began to embrace their Muslim identity.

"They start to put the hijab [on] and they don't want to take it off and everything they do, they do by the Muslim law," Mr Karroum said. "
Mohammad Ali Baryalei: Australia's most senior member of Islamic State funnelled fighters onto the frontline of Syria, Iraq wars
ABC 7.30 By Sean Rubinsztein-Dunlop with additional research by Jacquelyn Hole, Suzanne Dredge and Jeanavive McGregor

Both these Muslims and many many more supported the following actions

Yazidis' Iraq horror: 'I know what happened to them, but I cannot bear to say it'
SMH Ruth Pollard, September 8, 2014 - 3:15 PM

I ask again.

How quickly, when already supplied with the justification and authorization of a cultural codex of a genocide construct of Other does an imbued/primed infant-child-adolescence 'good'/
"ordinary girl" be turned to 'radical' adult given the cultural codex itself frames authority consistently constantly to promote such a genocide construct as a cultural 'good'?

No movement in the Australian Muslim Ethical mean to enable this infant-child-adolescent-adult; framed by Muslim family-peer group-community-exemplars; Muslim artifacts, rituals and text to become what he/she is
"commander of Iraqi Islamic State unit"/"death in a hail of bullets in Syria", despite being exposed to Others diametrically opposed counter ethics?

"It will be alleged the men were involved in recruiting, facilitating and funding people to travel to Syria to engage in hostile activities," the agencies said in a joint statement.
...
Mr Censori (Carpet Court owner whose business was next door to the iQraa Islamic Centre) described staff at the centre as "really quite friendly and pleasant".

" really quite friendly and pleasant"?

If
" really quite friendly and pleasant" is the front and "engage in hostile activities" is the back at which point can Other supporters of "Freedom of Religion"/Multiculturalism as well as so called other "really quite friendly and pleasant" Muslims guarantee to the rest of us when they say determining "really quite friendly and pleasant" Muslims as an inherent threat to society, any society within which Islam is allowed into the Public Square is Islamophobic, bigotry, racist etc.  reflects reality, rather than a desperate need to mask complicity by blaming the victims rather than the perpetrators Muslim culture as a whole, which consistently, constantly includes terror and major schism as a product of the Muslim behavioural variance?

To this:

"A SMALL number of Islamic radicals have “settled intentions” to conduct terrorist attacks in Australia, bolstering the case for the nation’s spy chief to recommend an increase in the terror threat level, which could happen as early as tomorrow."
Terror attack ‘plans’ in place — case to increase threat level bolstered THE AUSTRALIAN Paul Maley, Cameron Stewart, SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 12:00 AM

I ask again No move in the ethical mean of the Muslim whole of culture to enable this view above? No increasing support for such actions within the Muslim community as compared to 20 years ago? Still the same? The same level of threat emanates from the Muslim community as a whole as existed 20 years ago?

The continuing absurdity of ASIO director-general David Irvine and the Australian Federal Police policy approach inferring only 'few' or
'SMALL number' to hide the fact it is only ever a 'few' or 'SMALL number' who become cultural altruistic enforcers.  It is the same as claiming with the Nazi terrorists in Germany targeting Other inclusive of the Jews only a 'few' or 'small number' of the Nazi culture are directly involved so Nazism as an ideology cannot be held responsible. In fact this was the argument utilised by the Nazi as well as Other supporters at the time - did it alter the final outcome?

The real question ASIO director-general David Irvine and the Australian Federal Police have to ask themselves does Islam provide the
"artifacts, rituals and text to develop and reinforce a shared sense of identity among 'altruistic enforcer' members". The Muslim altruist enforcers and well as many Other can detail the "artifacts, rituals and text" which enable such Muslim terror and major schism. Islam as a whole culture, as we clearly sheet home to Nazism as a whole culture, is therefore responsible.

So many so called 'good'-'moderates' over so many years and still the statement "Terror attack ‘plans’ in place — case to increase threat level bolstered" is placed before us. When a strategy is clearly not working what do you do?

"It was one flag that could evoke horror. Yet it was put up for auction at a Sydney mosque, which was thronged with people, even children. And it went for over $2000. Even a drawing of the flag was bought.

The flag belonged to Islamic State members, who had allegedly murdered thousands in Iraq and Syria, and beheaded two western journalists, James Foley and David Sotloff.
“IS
By Revathi Siva Kumar | September 10, 2014 11:06 AM

I ask again if the statement today by the Prime Minister in raising the Terror alert level to high that Terror has nothing to do with religion - is the truth -
"Sydney mosque, which was thronged with people, even children."

These
“.people, even children" are of a religion, Islam, selling a Islamic religious symbol directly connected to a religious based terrorist organisation IS, within a Islamic religious meeting place. Muslim terror is not derived from Islamic codex it is derived from criminals who simply turn up without motive to kill people? You want to know how infant-child are turned in to terrorists this is part of the 'enculturation process' as Abbott would tell us, part of the process which is Abbott informs us not connected in any way to religion constructs of Other.

Today tragically I record the first of many deaths to come on Australian soil of Muslim and Other, today the first death is a Muslim and it is merely by chance and hard work on the part of the Australian security services that many more deaths have not been recorded before this.

Who knows there may be some deaths already taken place as a result of the Islamic religious construct of Other determined under some other category of which we are not aware, it would not surprise me.

If one looks simply through the newspaper links provided before this and the commentary one will see how obscene, not merely fallacious, is the notion "Not Religion"/Not Culture" is not the cause of this tragic death and stabbings of two courageous policeman doing their duty to protect.

If it were so, it was "Not Religion"/Not Culture" which caused this death and injury and the security policy utilised for the past twenty to thirty years has been based upon this notion why has the policy failed? Why is it the propensity of Muslims to kill Other has increased despite the proclaimed majority of Muslims over this time being 'moderate' and it has made no difference. Clearly the existence of any number of so called 'moderates' makes no difference in time and space, it may slow but not stop terror and major schism occurring in Australian streets. Clearly "Not Religion"/"Not Culture" has not worked.

"Police have named the attacker as 18-year-old Abdul Numan Haider, an Australian citizen from Narre Warren in Melbourne's south-east. His family had come to Australia from Afghanistan.
...
The Al-Furqan Islamic Centre in Springvale hosts a religious instruction school, along with lectures and discussions about Islam.
...
Their leader was a Bosnian-Australian man called Sheikh Harun or Abu Talha who once extolled the virtues of jihad, or holy war."
Abdul Numan Haider once connected with Islamic group Al-Furqan  The World Today By Alison Caldwell SEPTEMBER 24, 2014
MONIQUE HORE, JON KAILA HERALD SUN SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 3:10PM

"An Australian Muslim fighting in Syria and who supports the recent beheadings by Islamic State has told of his reasons for joining the conflict, and warned Australia against its involvement."
Islamic State 'is justified' MIKE DUFFY The West Australian October 11, 2014, 3:27 am

Greens leader Christine Milne calls for national Centre For Social Cohesion SBS 11 OCT 2014 - 3:29PM

The absurdity of the Australian Greens determining the Islamic 'problem' is to do with the marginalized economic or otherwise ignores the fact the Islamic cultural behavioural variance, as no other major culture on earth, informs such violence emanating from it consistently constantly from generation to generation. Not only from youth but adults as well. It is made out that these Muslims are all on some sort of boy’s crusade nothing is further from the truth. Yes on the battle front are men and women from the younger age group that is always the way no culture fights with the elderly as shock troops. The Muslims either change their cultural codex construct of Other or nothing changes.

Such a cultural construct which enables consistently constantly such an ethical outcome worthy of coexisting with Other in any Public Square?

"On reflection, Alberici said she hated that she didn't get the chance to ask this question:

"In his caliphate, in his ideal Islamic state would I, as a woman, have the opportunity to sit opposite him as an equal and engage in a robust discussion about these issues on the public broadcaster? I don't think he would have answered," she told Fairfax Media."

Lateline host Emma Alberici's only regret over Hizb ut-Tahrir interview SMH Lucy Cormack October 9, 2014

Benbrika urging terror recruits THE AUSTRALIAN Cameron Stewart OCTOBER 11, 2014 12:00AM


Radical Muslim cleric Ismail al-Wahwah tells supporters a new world order is coming BEN MCCLELLAN AND GEOFF CHAMBERS THE DAILY TELEGRAPH OCTOBER 11, 2014 12:00AM

I ask Shorten and Abbott at what point in Islamic codex belief and ethics which supports such Muslim notions of this so called radical Muslim cleric Ismail al-Wahwah are delineated from the liberal/moderate Muslim view, and importantly are these so called liberal/moderate Muslims as you define them (not as they define themselves as such) diminishing in number as would be expected given clearly the cultural altruist enforcers are able to move so freely within the Australian Public Square?


"Al Qaedaism, the ideology, is stronger today than ever, thanks to the failure of the Arab spring and the battlefield has expanded from Mali to Pakistan and beyond to Australia and Europe," he writes.
The world has misread the Middle East nightmare and our war without borders The Age
October 11, 2014, Paul McGeough

"In the recordings — dating back to 2011 and obtained by The Australian — Harun Mehicivic promotes fighting to ­establish an Islamic state and warns his followers against discussing certain issues openly. But he says they must know “the basic knowledge” of “how to wage jihad and against whom it must be waged”. He has also told his small, loyal group of followers that the conflict in Syria is a sign of an ­imminent final battle to be waged by Muslims.
....
In April last year, Islamic State’s predecessor in Iraq was praised by Mr Mehicivic during a speech in which he also promoted the “mujahideen” in Somalia, Yemen and Nigeria for using violence to establish sharia.

Two months earlier, Mr Mehicivic said Muslims who denounced jihadist groups were on the wrong path. “You find that there are people of Tawhid (monotheism) and people of jihad — this is the people that go a different way, the right way,” he said."

Aussie ‘emir’ preached jihad MARK SCHLIEBS THE AUSTRALIAN OCTOBER 14, 2014 12:00AM

Here we have above the perfect 'liberal/moderate' Muslim announcing  "jihadist groups were on the wrong path".  

Muslims and Other supporters of a clear cultural genocide proclaim - "
See this is clear evidence Muslims are against violence Muslims leaders themselves say so!"

But the reality in this example of Mr Mehicivic is the Islamic cultural genocide construct manifest, lying justified and authorised by "Islam's doctrines of deception" to Other as to the 'real agenda'.

This is simply not the usual case look the 'out-group' cannot be trusted simply because their the out-group. Here is a foundation codex (textual and exemplar (messiniac) templates) construct of the acceptability by a culture to lie to another Culture. 

Muslim cultural dishonesty an accepted means of interrelating to Other. It is not made up simply to determine an out-group cannot be trusted just for the sake of doing so, here is the proof not only in the Islamic codex but in the actions/words coming from the Islamic leadership itself in Australia. One therefore must not take the word of non-violence from the Islamic leadership as the final determination and utilise such statements to negate what is happening before our very eyes. 

Taqiyya is authority for Islamic religious dissimulation (lying,  to conceal the truth/intent).
"Quran 3:28 enjoins Muslims not to take the company of non-Muslims over Muslims unless as a means of safeguarding themselves. "Let not the believers take those who deny the truth for their allies in preference to the believers – since he who does this cuts himself off from God in everything – unless it be to protect yourself against them in this way…" Regarding 3:28, Ibn Kathir, a prominent authority writes, "meaning, except those believers who in some areas or times fear for their safety from the disbelievers. In this case, such believers are allowed to show friendship to the disbelievers outwardly, but never inwardly." He quotes Muhammad's companion, Abu Ad-Darda', who said "we smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them," and Al-Hasan who said "the Tuqyah is acceptable till the Day of Resurrection." 

We must therefore take what we see not what we are told as the basis for our policy on having Muslims in our midst. For clearly Muslims cannot be trusted to tell us the truth, because their very doctrine informs us they have no duty to do so. 



Purposefully lying is not authorised by Judeo-Christian ethics so to interpret the veracity of Islamic/Muslims culture through our own ethical view point 'lying is wrong' and therefore we expect Muslims to operate under the same 'norm' is a very dangerous act. As clearly this example above proves. 



To deny this is the case, explain the above, how are Mr Mehicivic words actions consistent? If they are not what therefore provides him with the ethical justification for his act, is it culturally supported or not? If it is culturally supported what does this mean regards the worth of proclamations by the Islamic/Muslim leadership that Islam/Muslim culture is a culture of peace and love?



How many broken bodies and lives will you need before it becomes obvious - the words are not matching the outcomes on the ground?

The absolute absurdity is that the Quran accuses Other of dissimulation (lying, to conceal the truth/intent) and condemns them for such acts. Yet the same text the Quran justifies and authorises the exact same behavior as a Muslim good, it is hypocrisy manifest - the act of Other in being so duplicitous supports the imposition of grievous harm and severest penalty but the same mealy mouthed Muslim utilisation of the same behavior praise and cultural necessity - and is it any wonder given what Islam/Muslims as a culture inform in time and space for Other?

This is why it is so stupid for the Western political elite to even consider Islam/Muslims are not a danger in time and space when given the opportunity of unfettered access to any Public Square it is only those who point out such a view is terribly flawed who are the enemy.


Security tightened at AIS after advice from ASIOOctober 13, 2014, Henry Belot, Canberra Times

Melbourne jihadist funding accused sees no crime in actions THE AUSTRALIAN OCTOBER 27, 2014 3:10PM

Is the unfathomable grief of just one childs loss worthy of the terrible price paid daily for having such a Cultural codex freedom of access to any Public Square be they adherent or non-adherent?

“Terrorism knows no border and its danger could affect several countries outside the Middle East. […] It is no secret to you, what they have done and what they have yet to do. I ask you to transmit this message to your leaders: ‘Fight terrorism with force, reason and speed.’”
Saudi king: Islamic State will reach ‘Europe in a month and America in another month’ By Douglas Ernst - The Washington Times - Saturday, August 30, 2014

The reality of such a statement not only of what is said but by whom it is said - the leader of Islam (Sunni) version, of a State which has been instrumental in advancing the very ethical construct of Other across the world which forms the foundation stones of the ethics of the 'Terrorism' of which the Saudi king speaks. The 'rational' model to which Western Democracies ascribe which allows this state to exist is tragic.

If 'reason' based upon an ideological model of facing the true source of 'Terrorism' was in place the Saudi king would not now exist to make such a statement. For the whole codex upon which the Saudi king based his ethics would have been swept into the dustbin of discredited ideological constructs along with the Greek Gods and the rest.

Turkish lawmakers brawl, then pass law By Gul Tuysuz, CNN February 15, 2014
Separation of Powers: Parliament, Executive and Judiciary - a proven method of holding the other positions of power accountable and in turn protecting the citizen from the excess of all three.

As Islam does not recognise such a separation it is of no surprise the Islamic Government in Turkey has decided to make the Judiciary subject to the Executive, the Law will now become whatever the Turkish Islamic Government determines it to be - or off with their Judicial heads.

Such is what Islam informs in time and space really did you expect something else?

It is amazing is it not mere statements that Islam and Muslims are a threat to society and have a clear political agenda of imposing their ethical notions on Other and women has in Australia as elsewhere people hauled up before the judicial courts accused of inciting hatred against a peaceful non-threatening culture.

People coming forward saying there is a growing potential of major cultural schism because Islam is a genocidal construct with exactly the same construct of Other as Mein Kampf and clearly as Islam/Muslims have done elsewhere since their beginning are in time and space bent on destabilising and destroying your cherished values despite the ever present so called "moderates in the community .. cowed by the federal government and its agencies into abandoning traditional and activist Islam.." are being branded as delusional criminal bigots,

Hira cave Mount Jabal an-Nour 7th Century to .Australia August 2013
- words and sentences are not strung together to inform no purpose, inform no action in response - "creation of a world caliphate to rule all Muslims according to traditional principles and sharia" this as we know is integral to the Muslim 'spectrum' yet humanity fails to act in self-defence. It is easier to let our grandchildren suffer from the heinous nature Islam informs?

Did anyone seriously other than a very few understand what Islam would really mean for Western Democracies if allowed to flourish external and internal 19 years ago? Does security improve with increased numbers of Muslims within a society - what do the statistics tell us?

Should humanity therefore be concerned regards what a specific culture informs in time and space and have a right to remove that culture from the Public Space if it informs terror (cultural war) and/or subjugation of women?

A genocide construct is a genocide construct - Cultural foundation codex (genetic, (con) textual authority, exemplar-leadership (messianic templates)), creates the cultural behavioural variance 'spectrum' in time and space and will continue to inform terror (cultural war) despite the ever present liberal moderate.

Being a patchwork 'true believer' and thereby assuaging your conscience as to what exists consistently constantly on your own cultures 'spectrum' derived directly from your own shared cultural foundation codex enables terror against Other to continue.

Washing your hands does not change who is responsible.

If your culture has anywhere along it's cultural 'spectrum', cultural war (terror) and it is historically a consistent, constant theme you are as an individual adherent as culpable, even the so called liberal/moderate, for the heinous crimes against the innocent as the bloody hands that pulled the trigger or thrust the blade.

The absence within the Public Square of an enforceable agreed and empowering definition of Other and women, between the secular and religious dogmas, even within Western Democracies is a tragedy in the making – Democracy in itself does not enable the maximized independence of all inclusive of women if the cultural foundation codex remains the same, because cultural foundation codex, unless forced to do so, overrides secular law in practice.

Western Democracies by enabling the Islamic cultural Foundation codex to flourish, sometimes even with State support, within their borders not only now have in situ Muslim terrorists but are exporting as well.

Change your Cultural Foundation Codex or nothing changes.

The following may be a guide to enable as best we can a questioning mind -  MindUP Program

Reflection on:
Ratliff, Kate A.; Oishi, Shigehiro Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 105(4), Oct 2013, 688-702. doi: 10.1037/a0033769

"This research examined the influence of a romantic partner’s success or failure on one’s own implicit and explicit self-esteem. In Experiment 1, men had lower implicit self-esteem when their partner did well at a “social intelligence” task than when their partner did poorly. Women’s implicit self-esteem was unaffected by partner performance. Experiments 2 and 3 showed that Dutch men’s implicit self-esteem was negatively affected by their romantic partner’s success. In Experiment 4, we replicated Experiments 1–3 in both the academic and social domains, and in Experiment 5, we demonstrated that men’s implicit self-esteem is negatively influenced by thinking about a romantic partner’s success both when the success is relative and when it is not. In sum, men’s implicit self-esteem is lower when a partner succeeds than when a partner fails, whereas women’s implicit self-esteem is not." (Ratliff, Kate A.; Oishi, Shigehiro, 2013)

If these negative feelings of male self-esteem are inherent regards the level of women’s relative status this would possibly inform Mans actions to diminish women’s opportunities(even in workplaces) and explain the basis for Mans propensity in ‘HIS’ religious and secular codex construct of women as less and restricted to Man’s determination. So as women, in say the Islamic culture, went along the different modes of dress to the extreme this would be seen to lift Muslims Mans implicit self-esteem as the women increased their visual adherence to subservience thus relieving to a degree whatever threat may be derived from Muslim Mans negative feelings of women possibly being equal in power or even seen and be 'better' than Muslim Man.

This could be culturally accentuated by cultural foundation codex supercharging Mans possibly innate propensity to suffer from 'little man syndrome'. The greater the restriction and subjugation of women informed by cultural foundation codex one would expect any deviation or threatened deviation would incur are relative response from Males derived directly from Mans need to ameliorate negativity and increase feeling of self-esteem of keeping women in their place.

Given the women did not exhibit any loss in self-esteem it could be women taking on signs of subservience do not suffer diminished self-esteem relative to Mans increase - maybe an evolutionary protection mechanism - not being able to 'feel' the true nature of their relativity - challenging the stronger 'physically' Man as to equality perhaps had such negative consequences overtime it informed such a state of inequity being if not 'right' acceptable by women.

It would be interesting to see if the 'little man syndrome' can be culturally differentiated in specific cultural contexts such as Muslim women’s clothing, if it is seen the Muslim Mans implicit self-esteem rises as the extremes of Muslim women’s clothing are reached one may be able to infer this has more to do with Muslims Mans ego and women innately understand this and this is why women submit to such a state rather than subservience to any God.

Of course this is not simply a Muslim Man issue at all but may go some way in explaining why Man treats women so badly and makes up pretend authority and fallacious justifications for keeping women subject and why some women acquiesce to this most outrageous circumstance 'Fear of What Man Can and Does Do'.

This could go in some way to explaining why education of females is not a high priority or completely opposed by male dominated cultures such as Islam and also the segregation inherent in the culture which places women at the back - increased male implicit self-esteem so dearly paid for. All of humanity are paying the price for the type of world we forego to enable this atrocity against women to continue.

Proof within the Islamic behavioural variance 'spectrum' women being 'free' to choose their own clothing style is a lie. Those women who support such a condition of 'freedom' exists within the Islamic codex are the most heinous perpetrators of an obscenity on their fellow gender.

"Both need to understand that whatever the culture, the woman has the right to decide what she puts on her body and the right to walk out wearing whatever she wants without being subject to harassment.” We Must Put an End to Street Harassment, Morocco World News Friday 13 June 2014 - 12:13 by Saba Naseem

I have just seen another article which questions the veracity of the notion a woman actually freely chooses to wear the "hijabs and niqabs". It is this article - Shariah Police Intensify Raids Prior to Ramadan Jakarta Globe By Nurdin Hasan Jun 12, 2014.

Clearly from a relative psychological position surely there has to be greater cultural pressure for women to conform to a 'standard' not equally demanded of Man. This article proves this to be a false claim?

Also the shaming and blaming of women for harassment even rape, even personal and other societal catastrophes for not adhering to imposed cultural dress constructs would appear to revolve around Mans control of women's sexuality and cultural ownership as one would brand a cow or horse - Freedom to be subject to such a construct strikes me as rather obscene.

Yes in a culture a slave may argue slavery is good and they are quite happy being a slave - it is a cultural artifact but does this make it right, a 'good'?

All cultures build palaces based upon an 'Architects' design (cultural foundation codex (textual and exemplar (messianic) templates) some only have four walls within which women are able to realise their 'full' potential - Men have?

Simply stating 'it', harassment and demeaning of women, happens elsewhere one has to be concerned how 'it' is relative to a current women's cultural ethical circumstances within the whole cultural behavioural variance not simply the so called 'good' end.

For women have to live under the whole cultural Male behavioural spectrum derived from the cultural codex, to take simply the 'good' end and say therefore everything is 'right' with the culture is a dangerous lie under which women have to exist.

One must then ascertain although 'it' happens in Other cultures is the spectrum under which women have to suffer better or worse? Is another cultural codex offering a greater chance overall for a women to achieve a flourishing life despite the fact 'it' has not been completely eradicated in Other's culture?

If 'it' is much less in the Other's culture a true test of the nature of your own culture is to attempt to change cultures, move palaces - if this is relatively dangerous - you have your answer.

Change the Architect and Builder or Change Nothing


It is not a matter of demonizing, stigmatizing nor erroneous stereotyping it is a matter of the evidence.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

National Council on Family Relations (NCFR) & Society for Personality and Social Psychology (SPSP) "The time has come for us to be honest with ourselves and indeed each other." Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenya's president, 2015

Please Explain: Nazi (Hitler-Mein Kampf) & Muslim (Mohammed-Quran) Cultural Codex Construct of Other. Why is it One Is and One Is-Not When both = "I don't mean participated, I mean observed."?

“To make one exception means to make them all.” - Clothing such as the Muslim headscarf, hijab, burqa... is a political cultural statement and informs adherence and respect for the ideological constructs attached to it which hold tragic consequences for women.