“Blow in!” “You’re a coloniser!” Lidia Thorpe

How have we arrived at an absurd political position of having to apologise, and hand over power-resources for free to a biology/culture for having saved them from a stone age existence?

"Underdog stories can inspire groups to achieve their goals. Leaders can use such stories to craft a collective identity that increases motivation, well-being, and creativity. However, when used improperly, the same basic story can also justify bad behaviour and foment outgroup bias."
Underdog stories can inspire us to greatness (or to break the rules), BIG THINK, THE LEARNING CURVE — FEBRUARY 21, 2023

“By despising himself too much a man comes to be worthy of his own contempt.” (Amiel, 1909, p. 180)

“We assume that the laws and mores of our own age have eternal and universal validity” Historicism, Frederick Beiser

“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.” ― George Orwell

“Blow in!” “You’re a coloniser!” Lidia Thorpe

We all Blow in. None of us as individuals, as biology/cultures, simply appear whole in a landscape-socialscape, at least according to Darwin’s theory of evolution, history, and scientific research to this point.

As individuals we Blow in when we are born, start a new job, move to a new town, a new school, new relationships, new landscape, new socialscape. As biology/culture ideologies we Blow in utilising soft and/or hard power into other landscape and socialscape when we immigrate to assume permanent residency in another landscape bringing our socialscape knowledge and life perspective with us. Why we do, how we do depend on historical context-forces. Force to emigrate is push force to immigrate is pull.

The history of human immigration is one of colonisation and recolonisation by other biology/culture ideology groups who have the soft/hard power to do so. Colonisation is the action, process of a living entity establishing itself in an area, of appropriating a place or domain for one's own use. It is the nature of human existence to be subject to and subject others to, it is not right or wrong it just is, force-power in contingency context.

Historically the results of immigration-colonisation have been mixed for the existing human groups and those immigrating into their space. For such events involves both seeking to improve their quality of life simultaneously competing for acquiring-retaining ownership of resources and with them increased-decreased power to control to change their habitat conditions to their benefit.

The immigrants will exploit the landscape-socialscape environment relative to their power and imported socialscape knowledge, beliefs, and relationship precepts in their codex regards the nature of those already resident in the landscape. A resident people are fortunate if the immigrants have no binding codex determining existing resident people inherently deviant, justifiably deserving of subjugation, elimination or complete exclusion from the landscape and or dominant political-resources socialscape within which they reside and increase the productivity of the existing resources to improve the quality of life for all rather than simply divide resources in existence or take destroy and move on.

How have we arrived at an absurd political position of having to apologise, and hand over power-resources for free to a biology/culture for having saved them from a stone age existence?

In Australia as elsewhere founded on a post WWII hegemony in humanities the Marxist, Leninist, Socialist, postmodernist intellectual elite determined all history fabricated literature to enforce capitalists, colonialist version of reality then proceeded to fabricate their own version of reality to control the narrative of the present and in doing so have taken control of the narrative of the past, changing colonialism into a grotesque malign myth, a weakening of history, where specific things, being male-white, British form of governance, protective policy for children, rules on alcohol, provision of education, exclusive indigenous space; assimilation away from tribal atrophy of entitlement and externalised locus of control a must to achieve parity all mythologised into an official line of evil.

Yet one has to consider the alternative, the counterfactual reality of the indigenous Australians in 1788 as a stone age culture being left as they are, as it was supposedly 65000 years prior they immigrated to the Australian continent with relatively little change in their culture clearly made them unready for the rapidly changing modernity about to engulf them with the arrival of any number of nations; the alternative Nation states such as Belgium and their draconian impact on indigenous populations who could have arrived on Australian shores would have in all probability informed a much more oppressive outcome for indigenous Australians.

The reality of the positive effect of British colonialism and subsequent Asian and European immigration is Australia in 2023 is ranked ninth in the Quality-of-Life Index country list. Seven Indigenous Australians were elected to the 47^th Australian parliament 2022. On any rational measure the opportunity such colonialisation which has enabled in Australia has to be determined a benefit not a negative for the potential of Indigenous people to improve their quality of life to a level unimaginable from a stone age context not three hundred years ago.

Given the contingencies of the time 1788 onwards the resources, the knowledge, the policy intent from the start to protect indigenous people from themselves and non-indigenous exploitation inevitably meant although elements of harm reside within any such transitions and the time to move from a stone age existence; subject to a large landscape difficult to fully police; significantly differing belief, governance, knowledge rationale systems, the potential for Indigenous Australians to continue to improve their condition utilising a European driven culture-knowledge created advanced society cannot be in any rational sense determine a stone age state preferable, which was the alternative.

For history to reflect reality and importantly to create a society which have values each citizen believes are worth dying to protect the Marxist, Leninist, Socialist, postmodernist intellectual elite has systematically taken apart Western Culture with a hatred imbued with a self-destruct mentality and are a clear and imminent danger to the survival of Western Democracies. Their Marxist objective of throwing all into the air has achieved at great and continuing cost.

"And in the end it was only because they had destroyed themselves by their own internal strife that finally they were forced to surrender." Thucydides

This following excerpt from Socialization and Hegemonic power, by Kenberry, G. J., & Kupchan, C. A. (1990) clearly establishes a fact of life for eons more powerful Nations seek to dominate others landscape-and/or socialscape via soft and hard power to have the citizens within conform to the goals of these more powerful Nations. This process is occurring now to the detriment and benefit of Australia and clearly being attempted by Russia in the main with hard power against Ukraine.

This same process in Australia flowing from the initial colonisation of Australia by the British and subsequent flow of Asian and European peoples regards the Indigenous population occurs at the biology/culture ideology group levels within a Nations borders in the form of “coercion. Inducements and sanctions” seeking to have Other accept their culture-ideology perspective as the norm, i.e. transvestites as women, terror as normative, silencing citizens dissent as normative as with Twitter and other media platforms.
 
This is life on our planet it is no use complaining, no use claiming the impossible the past could have been different than it was, or this is not how human groups interact or should interact. Unless a hegemonic biology/culture ideology want eternal societal schism, as Machiavelli rightly observed, the 'hegemonic power, … works at the level of substantive beliefs rather than material payoffs. Acquiescence .. the result of the socialization of Indigenous peoples/leaders. Indigenous elites and peoples buy into and internalize norms that are articulated by the hegemon and therefore pursue policies consistent with the hegemon's notion moral and behavioural order' or the conflict will continue.

“Most historical ages are marked by the presence of great powers, nations capable of dominating the course of international politics. An ongoing task of scholarship is to explore the nature of the shadow that hegemonic nations cast. How do hegemons assert control over other nations within the international system? Through what mechanisms does control get established, and by what processes does it erode? How is compliance achieved, and how is it maintained?

Most observers would argue that the manipulation of material incentives­ the use of threats and promises to alter the preferences of leaders in secondary nations-is the dominant form through which hegemonic power is exercised. Power is directly related to the command of material resources. Acquiescence is the result of coercion. Inducements and sanctions are used by the hegemon to ensure that secondary states prefer cooperation to non-cooperation.

But there is also a more subtle component of hegemonic power, one that works at the level of substantive beliefs rather than material payoffs. Acquiescence is the result of the socialization of leaders in secondary nations. Elites in secondary states buy into and internalize norms that are articulated by the hegemon and therefore pursue policies consistent with the hegemon's notion of international order. The exercise of power-and hence the mechanism through which compliance is achieved-involves the projection by the hegemon of a set of norms and their embrace by leaders in other.” (Kenberry & Kupchan, 1990)

Biology/Culture ideologies under whatever categorisation Imperialism, Colonialism, etc which take over other Biology/Culture ideologies landscape and impose their power-control over the socialscape of the inhabitants, are able to protect their borders expanded or otherwise are the rulers, are the sovereign power.

No amount of complaining, “I was here first 65,000 years or one week ago.” make any difference. It is not a matter of right or wrong as no one has an inalienable right to anything even life itself, it is a matter of power in context. You can invent/use made up human abstracts to justify such claims, scam enough citizens by convincing them it’s a “simple”, “moderate”, “generous” “enriching” “profound grace” offer raising you from your “powerless torment” to go along with these fabrications, but it will not change your relative power and importantly competency to rule to advance the quality of life for all, not just you and your own biology/culture.

Power is dependent upon resources and ability to utilise them to improve your quality of life. Power therefore must be given up by fellow citizens to realise your biology/culture ideology’s goal of sovereignty and fellow citizens diminishment of sovereignty for clearly landscape and resources for their own quality of life will be taken from them. The Voice and its associated claim of sovereignty is no free simple generous lunch.

Indigenous elites and supporters accusing others of massacring to utilise “Underdog” victim status to gain power-resources is pure hypocrisy when Australian Indigenous peoples were massacring their own at the same time they and the Marxist, Socialist, postmodernists "crafted story" of colonialism as a newly invented White European exploitative social construct commencing in 1492 with Columbus when it is the nature of biology/culture ideology human group interaction since the beginning, fabricating Australian indigenous as “underdog victims” to externalise culpability for Indigenous behaviour, imbuing a cognitive regression of self-enhancement rather than the much harder and beneficial self-improvement, demanding unearned entitlement, rather than face the reality in 1788 of a violent knowledge deficient Stone age culture who in no way had the capacity to develop a policy frame work to change their atrophied tribal culture who committed-committing even now more violence against themselves than others, as colonialism continues to provide the means resources, expertise in a concerted attempt to raise them into a rapidly changing modernity.

“The place was all surrounded by bush, and hundreds of Gundagai aborigines used to camp close by. And well do I remember many of the fights in which they participated.

About the year 1850 a big battle took place just behind where the old brick mill on Morley’s Creek now stands. One morning we were awakened at daylight by piteous begging of a blackfellow to be let into our house. My husband gave him entry, and then he let a number of others in. They told us the Lachlan tribe had swooped down on them in the night and had massacred some of the Gundagai tribe. The last black fellow to come in had a long spear sticking out of his stomach-and, really, I wasn’t sorry as he was a cheeky dangerous man. Next morning ??? went to see what the damage was, and found two blacks -Motogee and Mecky, dead while a large number were wounded. A number of gins were speared. One of them Kitty, escaped by swimming Morley’s Creek carrying her two piccaninnies, and […] the ??? Ark, which stood below where […]. The marauding band also speared dogs and did other damage. They took away with them the legs of the dead blackfellows, cutting the limbs off at the thigh. They also carried away the dead men’s kidney fat.

[…] After this slaughter the Gundagai blacks thirsted for revenge. They made elaborate preparations, and, leaving their gins behind, set out to pay back the debt they owed their Lachlan enemies. After being away some days, they returned laden with trophies of war-the most prized of which were the legs and kidney fat of some of their opponents. At night they made a big fire on the Flat, and roasted the flesh of the Lachlan victims, and partook of a cannibal feast.

The blacks never murdered any white folk. I recollect the last big fight between the tribes. An old man named Billy Pemberton was walking down our main street early one morning when a mob of strange blacks accosted him with, ‘’Where blackfellow camped?’’. Billy directed them the wrong way and ran and warned the local tribe. A lot of them raced to our place for shelter. My husband was away at the time-only myself and two babies were in the house. I let a couple of blackfellows in and they got under the bed. Others planted in the outhouse; in Turnbull’s store in Lindley's yard and one got under a cask. But he forgot his dog, which started scratching outside the barrel and when the “invaders” came along the dog's antics directed their attention to the barrel and they hauled out the planted man, and I don’t think there was an inch of his body into which they did not put spears.”
Daily Advertiser (Wagga Wagga, NSW : 1911 - 1954) Sat 18 May 1912 Page 3 Sixty Years Ago.

Reality of positive aspect of colonialism for which there is no alternative counterfactual context for any biology/culture starting from a Stone Age socialscape could have achieved:

"Owning more than 40% of the country is nothing? Multimillions $ of income from projects on their country is nothing? Record numbers of Indigenous learning their language & culture is nothing? Record numbers attending University & graduating is nothing?" Nyunggai Warren Mundine AO

My ancestors colonised Australia, as the Turks colonised the Byzantine landscape/socialscape, as the Norman's colonised England, as the Romans colonised, as the Aztecs colonised, as the Chinese colonised, as the Muslims colonised, as the Christians colonised, as the Hindu colonised,   as the Mongol golden horde colonised, as the Persians colonised, as the Greeks colonised, as the Zulu colonised, as the Japanese colonised, as the Australian aboriginals colonised assimilated other tribes landscape and socialscape.

E********* @A******* Jan 14 Twitter
Replying to @******Aus
 
“Sorry bruz, but you clearly no nothing. My grandfathers tribe got so big because it wared with neighbouring tribes and absorbed them. The last tribal war they fought was in the 1920’s against the Bundjalung people, we still have a shield from that war with spear tip holes.”

One must ask what is the difference between the moral precepts of the above effect with imperialism the power to take others landscape "wared with" and colonialism the power to assimilate others socialscape "absorbed them"?

It is therefore hypocrisy of any Indigenous person or group claiming their own imperialist, colonialist actions against each other have no correlation with European Imperialism/Colonialism or entailed comparatively no grief, no moral injury, no soft/hard power taking landscape and assimilating socialscape of other Indigenous peoples.

The result of the Marxist, Socialist, postmodern fabrication of colonialism as evil rather than a positive enabling force for stone age cultures is encapsulated in the following a quintessential ‘progressive’ lie expounded by Labors Tickner Former Australian Minister in Hawke and Keating Governments; author; humanitarian campaigner; nuclear weapons ban and prison reform advocate:

“The report documents, in a way never before achieved, the impact of European settlement upon Australia’s indigenous peoples, their dispossession and subordination within a dominant and often hostile society frequently motivated by self-interest, the development of racist attitudes both overt and hidden and the way in which these attitudes became institutionalised in the very practices of legal, educational, welfare and Aboriginal assistance authorities.”
Act now on enduring disgrace of Indigenous deaths in custody, By The Age's View, March 5, 2023

And the actual cause lack of indigenous culpability for their own behaviour. Of course, significantly higher per capita negative behaviour across all social measures leads inevitably to negative outcomes per capita. You are entitled to outcomes you inform.

The view expressed by Labors Tickner relieves Indigenous citizens of culpability for their criminal acts, their health physical and psychological wellbeing blaming colonisation which is the inevitable and normal result of a hegemonic power immigrating into your landscape to which no biology/culture has not been subject, instead of their own behaviour. It is an appalling misalignment of culpability. It also claims dispossession is the cause which is the inevitable consequence facing any colonised biology/culture. The Irish arriving in this country were not only dispossessed but also transported across the world in chains to work in chain gangs.

Being shackled is not the preserve of only one biology/culture. If dispossession of landscape is inherently the cause of a biology/culture propensity to inform negative behavioural outcomes everyone would be informing the same because no biology/culture has been immune from dispossession.

Also of course prejudice, hostility will be rationally created against any biology/culture informing negative outcomes impacting on others to demand otherwise denies the reality of how humans as individuals and groups derive threat to themselves and others. Are the citizens of Alice Springs and elsewhere to be positively enamoured with that to which they are subject?

There has been no institutionalised prejudice if you behave badly bad things will result, if you fail to turn up to class and fail to have appropriate behavioural templates to encourage success you will fail to achieve. If you utilise the provision of welfare payments, services, and housing in a deleterious manner it is not welfare provision which has failed it’s your misuse of the same.

The claim war was endemic is another colonialism myth sporadic conflict yes, a war that pitted nation against nation no. Isolated tribal-band conflict yes but not across the whole of Australia. Clearly there were indigenous tribes/bands not at all interested in waging a conflict with Europeans as Europeans did not.

First European settlement of Young New South Wales, 376 km west of Sydney via the Hume Freeway

“Cobern Jackey     
When James White was unable to get a Government Land Grant he decided to find land for himself in the unsettled area along the newly discovered route of Hume and Hovell. He travelled through Goulburn and came to  the  Boorowa River, from here he headed west and came to the  junction of two creeks, he decided to camp here for the night. As he was boiling his billy he was confronted by an imposing Aborigine, who claimed he was the Chief of the Lachlan River Tribe.

There was a moment of hesitation and uncertainty but James gave his new acquaintance respect and produced some gifts from his pack horse. The aborigines told White that the name of the place was Burrowmunditroy and the creek was called Bulla. Jacky belonged to the Wiradjuri tribe and originally came from Cabonne near Orange, so James White named him Coborn Jacky.

White returned to Sydney to get more supplies and to bring workmen and his stock back to his new home. He brought with him gifts for the natives and a crescent-shaped breast plate on a chain for Jacky, on which was inscribed ''Coborn Jacky, Chief of the Burrrowmunditroy''.

A corroboree was held 1826 in White's honour after which White was shown a better place for a homestead. Near a deep running sandy creek which the natives called ''Burrangong''; ''Burran'' meaning ''meeting place of kangaroos'' and ''Gong'' meaning '' water'' or ''creek''.” Information board Young historical society, 2023

Consultation is taking place now because colonialism has enabled this to occur via creating a mutual discourse space where concepts are understood. You cannot gain knowledge by staring at a book nor can it occur without biology/culture dislocation transition grief. As it has always been and will be.

In the beginning as a stone age culture how would you be able to develop the educational infrastructure policy and resources to improve quality of life without European knowledge without a grasp of a European language to increasingly provide feedback mechanisms of consultation?

Unless the Marxist, Socialist, Labor, ‘progressive’ cease imbuing indigenous citizens with a belief they are not responsible for their debilitating behaviour nothing will change and nor will the rhetoric of externalising culpability. As it has become an industry

Those shouting, “You’re a colonialist!” are hypocrites as they have a stunted postmodern imbued understanding of what colonialism is, its positive historic and continuing force rather than as a one-sided negative abstract. Hypocrisy as there is no biology/culture who has not applied the same methodology to other biology/culture. I also argue albeit anecdotal, the Indigenous people perpetrated much more harm against each other as they do now than in conflict with Europeans. Indigenous citizens need to seek repentance, forgiveness and recompense from each other.

Which reinforces my view colonialism was/is on balance a positive factor and in essence the only way to improve indigenous quality of life which had to be directed, managed and imposed by an outside colonial policy force to achieve positive change otherwise there was as the 1920s inter-indigenous conflict reveals a continuance of violence templates for continuing generations.

Imperialism and colonialism simply did not commence with the increased capacity of Europeans to project power from 1492 with Columbus, biology/cultures have sought imperialist ambition to take others space, to exploit resources within, to colonise-assimilate populations into their own cultures. This is the norm and clearly such ambition of imperialist colonialist hegemony have not ceased. The naivety of Merkel, the naivety of the Western Democracies deleting prejudice, deleting nationalism running down their military, inviting antithesis biology/culture ideologies into their midst who deliver terror and create increasing schism are easily manipulated by altruists within and without, causing inevitable reactive violence, as well as the imposition of antithesis moral constructs on citizens creating increasing aggression and outlier violence becoming normative as the progressive elites deviance paradigms bite deeply into the societal psychic.

For these purveyors of destructive intent against that which sustains them, present cascading regressive policies for actual improvement of indigenous peoples, as they must, encouraging unrealistic reality of based upon First and Second Citizens, a fallacious notion history could have been very different, the present would reflect that Marxist, Socialist, Postmodern fantasy. Such difference raising expectations of Entitlement Free Respect, Free Resources, Free Power without putting shoulder to the wheel. Cases where parity with non-indigenous citizens in almost every social measure have clearly not been reached, there has been unremitting Marxist, Socialist, Postmodern push back on outside protective governance handing more power to decide by indigenous communities themselves have resulted in disaster and reimplementation of policy or worse fear of reimplementing because it crosses the grotesque Marxist, Socialist, Postmodern myth making line.

Be proud of your Australian colonialist ancestors they built this country from a stone age landscape socialscape in less than three hundred years.

Yes, my ancestors were colonisers carrying on the tradition of what more powerful biology/culture ideologies have always done, are doing and will do.

Colonialism saved the Australian Indigenous people from their violent stone age existence, they seriously want to return? Also, they engaged in the same process of taking other tribes’ landscape and assimilating them into their socialscape. So, it is pure hypocrisy to shout such idiocy across the aisle.

"You’re a coloniser!" Lidia Thorpe

Answer: "So whose biology/culture has not taken Others landscape and assimilated the people into their own socialscape as yours has done as well? "You’re a coloniser Lidia Thorpe, welcome to humanity”

Welcome to country these are my ancestor’s traditional lands of Sheehan, Quinn, McGarvey, O'Brien, Luff, Devlyn, Toomy, Smith, .... who developed this land from its Stone Age landscape, socialscape to a Nation indexed ninth in Quality of Life.

And you were saying?"

If we accept "Existing explanations ascribe norm violations either to insufficient socialization or to interest misalignment between providers and recipients." then as the "insufficient socialization" is the responsibility of the biology/culture family, community and its institutions clearly they have no knowledge of what would constitute sufficient socialisation as they would be already be applying that knowledge therefore their Voice is useless in contributing to a resolution of the gap, other than acquiescing to an outside developed positive socialisation policy.

Also given the existence of "misalignment between providers and recipients" the assumptions as to the cause of the failure of closing the gap are either false or suboptimal requiring significant reflection of the veracity of the paradigm and those who champion its integrity the providers and the receiver indigenous peoples who are either unaware a misalignment exists or unable to develop an alternative. Either way the Voice is a useless Marxist-Socialist clown change vehicle. Plenty of noise, smoke, plastered smirks, and floppy large red shoes.

All that occurs with the acceptance of the Voice is the indigenous elite gain more power, with it more resources and become less culpable for the failures which inevitably will follow as the same assumptions of colonialism as the cause of the indigenous condition rather than their socialist imbued Entitlement which prevents them from being motivated to diligently improve their own behaviours, attitudes and with them their level of quality of life.

It is a grotesque myth of historic reinterpretation to claim a society which has achieved ninth on the quality of life scale 2023, created by European colonialism is a failure when the alternative was a continuance of a stone age existence or given the historic context colonisation by another imperialist nation being inevitable, it just so happened the British arrived.

There has been no white supremacy it has been a relative difference in knowledge which is power which colonialism policy from the start sought to remedy, to give Indigenous people the knowledge to be able to participate fully in societal decision making. How else do you claim transfer of knowledge to indigenous people could be achieved given the context?

As the Marxist, Socialist, Labor, ‘progressive’ imposed fabricated status of Indigenous Australians is a lie so must be the Marxist, Socialist, Labor, ‘progressive’ determination the very biology/culture system systemically creating substandard behaviour has the answer for and the motivational force to hold themselves accountable without an outside political force making sure resources and expertise are appropriately applied and justified to achieve increasing quality of life. The Voice is delusion as to its capacity to achieve change, it will simply self-enhance, enrich the elite in unearned power and wealth.

To expect any members of a biology/culture transgenerational development system, particularly an elite whose aim is always to maintain-increase power and the access to resources via fabricated beliefs of entitlement, to develop policy, resource, implement, monitor, review, assume culpability to internalise locus of control and bear the costs of such cathartic dislocation change to achieve parity is delusion.

Voice is a self-management template straight out of the failed Marxist Socialist, Leninist, Mao rule book. How many lives and resources have already been sacrificed across the world when any society allows such a broken-down vehicle to deliver a rising quality of life?

A cancer patient may participate-collaborate in a cure, as in the choice of their doctor and procedure of cure but they cannot cure themselves. The Voice is a pretence the patient can not only take on the role of surgeon, but they will also assume responsibility for running the hospital.

There is more work to be done for to believe in a few generations thousands of years of cultural beliefs, behaviours could be changed in just 235 years is absurd.

Even more absurd is believing the very people imbedded in a system informing substandard results on any social measure as a cultural individual, family, community group have the answer themselves or the incentive to change when they are imbedded in the regeneration of transgenerational behaviour having no idea how to create a policy and generate the incentivised motivation to change learned habits is damaging delusion.

No system can or will change without an outside force insisting that change take place, if a social system is accountable only to the elite within as they have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo, their power in the system and the myths which sustain the resources base they intend to continue to exploit.

All this is because of the relentless WOKE Marxist, Leninist, Socialist, postmodernist intellectual elites search for new victims of the capitalist system new perpetrators, even once determined victims the working class are now ignorant oppressors along with the bourgeoisie, as Burke said any political system will have victims trying to resolve all of them is an impossible task. It destroys the capacity of a society to defend itself not only from outside forces but from itself.

Australian citizens must react decisively to reject and reframe the never ending divisive, dividing conflict of Marxist Socialist Labor Progressive made up dialectic materialism paradigm of the oppressed and oppressor imbued within Australian citizens of aboriginal ancestry belief of Entitlement.

The Voice is a force of segregation not assimilation of moral and behavioural changes which will enable Australia to move forward peacefully and at the same time improve the quality of life for indigenous peoples. Yes, culture is important as it is for the Irish, Greeks, Hungarians, Germans but to create to separate First and second peoples leads to conflict that will become increasingly costly. No biology/culture has an inalienable right to place themselves above other biology/cultures in a Democracy, and this is exactly what the Voice does.