Rudd your yellow star Chinese cheer squad spankies are showing and now you give us your wisdom on how it all came to pass.

Rudd your yellow star Chinese cheer squad spankies are showing and now you give us your wisdom on how it all came to pass.

The first absolute for biology/culture ideology survival is dissimulation, without dissimulation, discover-adapt-overcome is not possible for antithesis biology/culture ideologies. You have ‘to be sure of getting the quid before you give the quo’. Creating naive diplomats-politicians who assume we are more alike than different, that there is a universal proletariat with common needs, wants, methods and particularly definitions and categories is a dangerous assumption.

“A nation, like man, is the creature of its past."
THE REVOLUTIONARY IDEA IN FRANCE, 1789-1871, By Lord Elton, 1923.

The return of Confucius and the Russian Orthodox church did not make it blindingly obvious?

Taliban to impose their interpretation of Sharia law in Afghanistan, By Sahar Akbarzai, Shafi Kakar and Rhea Mogul, CNN, 15-11-2022

'What Have We Done With Democracy?’ A Decade On, Arab Spring Gains Wither, NYT, By Vivian Yee, Oct. 10, 2021

"Khomeini nonetheless reassured his liberal revolutionary compatriots — just months before the revolution, while in Paris exile — that “women [would be] free in the Islamic Republic in the selection of their activities and their future and their clothing.”

The Ayatollah Under the Bed(sheets) In the Islamic Republic of Iran, all politics may not be sexual, but all sex is political. BY KARIM SADJADPOUR APRIL 23, 2012

“…Deng was the proposer and decision maker of enacting martial law in parts of Beijing in 1989,” Mr. Wu wrote. “And he gave the final approval to the ‘ground clearing’ operation in Tiananmen Square on June 3.”(Wines & Jacobs, 2010)

After the failure of Marxist-Leninism in China, the Marxist stage of proletariat dictatorship failing as in Russia to deliver sustainable growth, instead delivering millions purged starved, worked to death with the proliferation of gulag concentration camps of the. ignorant, the defectors, Deng-China fell back to the Marxist bourgeois stage of capitalist development. Deng had no intention of relinquishing Marx’s the end justify the means. The capitalist bourgeois inclinations of the Chinese people themselves, embedded in all humanity to improve their life condition-survival for themselves and their own family, community circle, would be incited to greed-wealth as would the external Western holders of the keys to China’s modernisation, both would be exploited to propel China to a modernised state of soft-hard power able to challenge the dominance firstly of Western Democratic international institutions imposing adherence to Democratic ideals to gain access to the appropriate intellectual, investment capital which China deftly sidestepped to obtain the intellectual property, to make its own, sending its sons and daughters out into the Western centres of knowledge to learn, steal from the self-defined capital imperialists and return to develop the spear to be directed at its heart.

Or is the above made up interpretation of human events the very reason we have allowed antithesis biology/culture ideologies to grow out of our self-humiliation, genuflecting to their every wish only to find we are faced with our own annihilation. Could it be Emperor Deng realised Marx was a load of crap and the only way was to re-establish the emperor’s court of powerful advisors with greater access to resources was to appeal to the greed of the masses and to only too willing Western self-defined imperial capital exploiters and slavers of the world?

“To Palmer Hoyt, 2 September 1944
I find that whenever any American suggests that we act in accordance with the needs of our own security he is apt to be called a god-damned fascist or imperialist, while if Uncle Joe suggests that he needs the Baltic Provinces, half of Poland, all of Bessarabia and access to the Mediterranean, all hands agree that he is a fine, frank, candid and generally delightful fellow who is very easy to deal with because he is so explicit in what he wants. Hoping you are the same, I am…” (Millis & Duffield, 1951, p. 14)

“The Under Secretary of State, [Joseph C. Grew, former Ambassador to Japan] speaking for Mr. Stettinius who was absent, said that the State Department proposed to send negotiators who would trade on a quid pro quo basis. I interjected that the military were in accord with that with the qualification that we would like to be sure of getting the quid before we gave the quo. I said it came down to who did the negotiating, and Mr. Stimson supported me in this, saying that the State Department did not normally produce the type of negotiator who dealt in the vulgar language of being sure of what he got before he signed a document.”(Millis & Duffield, 1951, p. 25)

"Our problem--to achieve accommodation between the power we now possess, our reluctance to use it positively the realistic necessity for such use, and our national ideals.” James Forrestal (Under Secretary of the Navy) September 1944(Millis & Duffield, 1951, p. 6)

“In war the military commitment is total, and to strike the "balance" against civil life and resources presents no great difficulty. But peace was approaching; and peace, whatever its shape, would still require the maintenance of sufficient defenses. He was worried, as his letters repeatedly show, over "the dangerous assumptions that because we have finished one war we shan’t have another." But what would be sufficient? What would have to be defended, and why and how?”(Millis & Duffield, 1951, pp. 5,6)

“By despising himself too much a man comes to be worthy of his own contempt.”(Amiel, 1909, p. 180)

“The destruction of the Western hegemony is irreversible," he added, as he neared the climax of his oration. […]

The rest of his (Putin) speech went along well-worn lines, accusing Western countries of imperialism, colonialism, hypocrisy, and historical sins such as the bombing of Hiroshima and Dresden in WW2.”(RETTMAN, 2022)

The inherent danger in postmodernism and post colonialism is the paradigm of the ‘glance’ rather than the whole, from a perspective of sackcloth and ashes cultural-ideology self-humiliation, submission to a twisted view of historical utility based squarely upon the Marxist worldview of the delineation of an oppressed and oppressor, not self-reflection which enables space for the reality of benefit rather than singular oppression.

"Scholars and political leaders describe increasing concerns about Chinese government influence over teaching and research in the U.S. and Australia."
China’s ‘Long Arm’, INSIDE HIGHER ED, By Elizabeth Redden, January 3, 2018

“The Chinese in ancient times referred to themselves as the Hua, the “Flowery” – or “Splendid” people, a designation that even today constitutes part of the official name of China. They also spoke of their country as Chung–kuo, or the Middle Kingdom, picturing themselves as occupying a bright plateau of civilisation that sloped off sharply on all sides into barbarian darkness. In these dark outer regions lived various non-Chinese peoples, differing from the Chinese in language and habits and in many cases pursuing nomadic or hunting and gathering mode of life, in contrast to the overwhelming agricultural Chinese.
In an effort to open up new lands for cultivation, the Chinese were continually pushing into the territories of these foreign tribes, spurring them at times to armed resistance. Thus, as in the preceding Shang, The ruler and his barons were frequently engaged in warfare with enemies abroad or with insurgents within the realm.”
LAO-TZU, Tao Te Ching, Hackett Publishing Company, 1993

“China’s rise is explained as much by its long and deep historical and cultural experience as it is from deliberate actions taken by those recent and current leaders most identified with its ascendance to great power status. Sino-centrism has framed Chinese thinking for centuries. It is embodied in the belief that China is a superior civilization with a legitimate claim as the cultural centre of the world. In Mandarin, China’s name literally translates to “Middle Kingdom.” Thus, China’s renewed activist strategy to ascend to great power is rooted in the idea of assuming its rightful place in world affairs.”
OUTPLAYED: REGAINING STRATEGIC INITIATIVE IN THE GRAY ZONE, A Report Sponsored by the Army Capabilities Integration Centre in coordination with Joint Staff J-39/Strategic Multi-Layer Assessment Branch, 2016

Gosh who would have foretold the obvious, the truth of our human circumstance. We are survivalist hypocrites by necessity nothing can be made relatively secure for ourselves, families, communities, Institutions wealth which are our biology/culture ideology artifacts without a common-biology, common culture, common ideology and a nationalism equal to the wars in progress and those to come, as wars will, to protect and enhance what we have. There is no real human destiny of heaven, paradise, utopia, rights, equity, equality, freedom, dialectic materialism they are made up tools as one has a saw to cut ones wood for a house, they are used to build justification authorisation for why we can keep what we own and take from others what our power enables.

XI China could care less for Rudd’s socialist babbling. There is no socialist vision of “common prosperity” it's survival of the court and dominance of China to the degree it prevents defection. Full stop. Which means destruction of Western Democracies.

The following reminds me of what passes for art on the floor of our postmodern post-colonial art galleries.

“Under XI, ideology drives policy more often than the other way around.”
“XI’s rise has meant nothing less than the return of the Ideological Man.”

No wonder we are in such a shit hole with these types of diplomats running our Western Democracies.

Get with the program we start in the Western Democracies respecting majority prejudices, we stop providing universities resources to train people to denigrate their own societies to such an extent we reduce our defence resources and consume ourselves to death by believing there is still grain in the Kulaks cellars and attempt to ameliorate every societal ill so there are insufficient resources for infrastructure and productivity of wealth to sustain these never ending ills.

Democracy within any political space does not mean every evil, every inequity, every prejudice will be stopped, every minority be given equal power to the majority. 

Democracy means every citizen will be given an opportunity to vote in  representatives who they perceive with the limited cognitive-knowledge ability they possess, fellow citizens that will manage their affairs in such a way as to defend the Democratic institution first, then judge what scarce resources exist for internal security and productivity and make sure what we derive from that productivity we do not utilise to consume ourselves to death.

I prefer Lincoln’s view of what a Democracy must be to be a real Democracy, not Antifa's 'legalized violence' or Biden Democrats ostracism deviance labelling of fellow citizens with a differing truth as evil to resolve political/social conflict, which is Democracies antithesis, a dictatorship of thought inciting violence.

"Self-defence is legalised violence. With no self-defence it's suicide. Communities mobilise to promote self-defence and to defeat the far-right." Antifa Australia, Facebook, September 26 at 9:04am

"Those who are most effective in claiming the moral high ground have been able to rally their people, dehumanise the target and take what they want." The Master Strategist, Ketan J. Patel, 2005

".. the character of society flows from the intellectual forms which predominate in it." A Dictionary of Sociology, Oxford University Press, 2009

“It was one of Lincoln’s ways of working out his chief value to the country, and that value was his clear sense from the start it was our democratic scheme that was at stake, and that if it was to be saved, every citizen who could aid must help to give all that was in them.

Lincoln seems to have put it something like this to himself. Everybody in the country has had a part in bringing this thing about; everybody feels they have a right to say how things shall be handled; everybody that is worth their salt is going to exercise that right, and they are going to do it according to the kind of person they are – according to their temperament, their training, their self-control, their meanness, and their goodness. If we are going to put this thing through and prove that citizens can govern themselves, we must get from them what they can give, and we must let them give it in their own way.” Source: The Life of Abraham Lincoln, Tarbell, 1917

The golden rule for every citizen in a true Democracy:

"..it is probable I have been more presuming than becomes me. However, upon the subjects of which I have treated, I have spoken as I have thought. I may be wrong in regard to any or all of them; but, holding it a sound maxim that it is better only sometimes to be right than at all times to be wrong, so soon as I discover my opinions to be erroneous, I shall be ready to renounce them." Lincoln

It is about biological/culture ideology survival in the moment not some great historical struggle with these bloody evils we invent. Which turn out to be each other and Other destined for grievous harm and elimination so we can preserve what we have and take what they have. To the extent we do the later and the methods we utilise depends upon the nature of our codex, our destiny our obligations as adherents and Other are contained within.

Nationalism, assimilation are not crimes they are survival absolutes.

"A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure, permanently, half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved — I do not expect the house to fall — but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other.” ― Abraham Lincoln

The German Chancellor admitted being naïve be a brave boy Rudd admit the same before digging us deeper into your Marxist socialist dialectic hole. It doesn’t even have shadows.


Amiel, H. F. (1909). Amiel's Journal: The Journal Intime of Henri-Frédéric Amiel; Tr., with an Introduction and Notes. Macmillan and Company.
Millis, W., & Duffield, E. S. (1951). The Forrestal Diaries. Viking Press.
RETTMAN, A. (2022). Putin declares holy war on Western 'satanism'. @euobs. https://euobserver.com/world/156188
Wines, M., & Jacobs, A. (2010). Deng Is Said to Have Backed Tiananmen Violence (Published 2010). Retrieved 2022-11-12, from https://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/05/world/asia/05china.html

"When states are acquired in a province differing in language, in customs, and in institutions, then difficulties arise; and to hold them one must be very fortunate and very assidious. One of the best, most effective expedients would be for the Conqueror to go to live there in person. This course of action would make a new possession more secure and more permanent; and this was what the Turk achieved in Greece. For all the other measures he took, had he not gone to settle there he would have found it impossible to hold the state. Being on the spot, one can detect trouble at the start and deal with it immediately; if one is absent, it is discerned only when it has grown serious, and it is then too late. And besides, this policy prevents the conquered territory from being plundered by one’s officials. The subjects are satisfied because they have direct recourse to the Prince; and so they have more reason to love him, if they want to be good, and to fear him, if they want to be otherwise. Anyone wishing to invade the state has to think twice about it. So if he settles there the ruler can lose his new state only with the greatest difficulty.

…….

And here it has to be noted that men must be either pampered or crushed, because they can get revenge for small injuries but not the grievous ones. So any injury a prince does a man should be of such a kind that there is no fear of revenge. If, however, instead of establishing settlements the Prince sends in troops, expenses are far higher, as all the revenues have to be devoted to the defense and the gain becomes a loss. The Prince does far more injury, because he harms the whole state by billeting his army in different parts of the country, everyone suffers from this annoyance, and everybody is turned into an enemy. And those who grow hostile can do him harm, because they remain, defeated, in their own homes. In every way, therefore, this means of defense is as useless as colonisation is useful.”The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli, written 1513

As in Japan one has to stay in the same space bending the culture ideology to ones own, altering belief, institution systems until it represents no antithisis to your codex, evil no longer exists.