What one looks for in a Biowarfare Attack. Biological warfare has become central to China's military strategy, it is very important that the world takes this opportunity to prepare for an even worse outbreak and understand until we find out the actual source of the coronavirus this must be treated as a biowarfare attack by China despite the cost to their own citizens.

Biological warfare has become central to China's military strategy, it is very important that the world takes this opportunity to prepare for an even worse outbreak and understand until we find out the actual source of the coronavirus this must be treated as a biowarfare attack by China despite the cost to their own citizens.

“There’s naturally-caused epidemics and bioterrorism-caused epidemics that could even be way worse than what we experienced today and yet, the advances in medical science should give us tools that, you know, we could do dramatically better."

‘Dead bodies at Wuhan lab’: Donald Trump’s explosive revelation, The Australian, SHARRI MARKSON, SEPTEMBER 20, 2021

"Internet 2.0, based in Canberra, reached its damning verdict after analysing 1,716 procurement contracts for the purchase of equipment potentially used to test for Covid-19 in Hubei province.

The claims add fuel to a growing understanding that the Chinese government withheld information and even lied about many aspects of the devastating virus. 

Internet 2.0's white, 'Procuring for a Pandemic', found 'abnormal' and 'dramatic increase' in the equipment by The Wuhan Institute of Virology, the Chinese army, the local disease prevention centre and a local university."
Chinese spending on PCR tests rocketed way before coronavirus reported,
Peter Vincent For Daily Mail Australia, 6-10-2021

The cultural sensitivity paradigm driving the fabricated construct of the racism cognitive hand grenade which enables the blindsiding of rationally derived bias-prejudice against dangerous antithesis biology/culture ideologies, which has the US providing resources for China to develop highly dangerous variants of viruses when it had been previously clearly stated by the Chinese elite biological warfare would be a part of their military's arsenal, must be openly challenged as albeit for the nicest of intentions with the hope we are more alike than different and those differences make us stronger it clearly is not as universal as the 'good' would have us believe. Bias-prejudice against Other groups until they have proven not to be an inherent threat to the security of a society is rational and developed by humans for a very good reason - the survival of them and theirs. 

"This work was supported by National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFC1200800) and Advanced Customer Cultivation Project of Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences."
Phylogeography, Transmission, and Viral Proteins of Nipah Virus, Bangyao Sun,1,2 Lijia Jia,1,2 Bilin Liang,1,2 Quanjiao Chen,1 and Di Liucorresponding author1,2, Published online 2018 Oct 11

Authorities race to contain deadly Nipah virus outbreak in India, CBS News, BY ARSHAD R. ZARGAR, SEPTEMBER 6, 2021

"The southern state accounts for two-thirds of new infections in India, despite having only 3 per cent of the population and a vaccination rate that, at 70 per cent, is higher than the national average"
India’s great coronavirus mystery: why so many cases in Kerala?, 
Amrit Dhillon, 31 Aug, 2021


Apparently there are techniques which enable mutant varieties to be created, one of which is the following, but one has to test the variants to ascertain what effect they have, either with a captive group human/non-human or altruistic volunteers. In China's case enemies of the state would possibly be a first go to, or serendipity such as the sickness in Wuhan laboratory workers. China's reticence is an obvious indicator of a rogue State covering the bodies. And therefore must to be punished for releasing such a virus until it proves otherwise.

"Jacob and Monod used what is actually a very common approach to understanding the structure and function of proteins and the genes that control them. They performed what we call a mutant screen. They took E. coli and exposed them to a number of mutagenic agents, things like UV light or chemicals that induce mutations in DNA, because they were trying to create mutant phenotypes specifically that lacked some aspect of function related to the ability to metabolize lactose. The idea here is that, if you create a mutant that isn’t able to do a particular thing, then that mutation must somehow have
affected the gene that is responsible for producing the protein that causes
that thing to happen." Jacob and Monod 1950
Biology: The Science of Life, Professor Stephen Nowicki, 2004

Although from  a Western Democratic moral ethos cognition a difficult reality hypothesis, IF a country such as China were to develop or in the process of developing a biowarfare weapon to effectively eliminate the potential capacity of a biology/culture ideology to defend itself, particularly if they have a severe male to female imbalance, what would you expect to be one of the desirable traits of the resultant bioweapon?

"The COVID-19 pandemic is a striking example of this: the number of infected men and women is similar in most countries, but male patients have higher odds of death compared to female ones." Darwin Made an Error About Sexual Selection, New Research Reveals
TAMAS SZEKELY, THE CONVERSATION, 18 JUNE 2021

"The paper titled The Unnatural Origin of SARS and New Species of Man-Made Viruses as Genetic Bioweapons suggested that World War Three would be fought with biological weapons. [...] The document revealed that Chinese military scientists were discussing the weaponisation of SARS coronaviruses five years before the COVID-19 pandemic."
Chinese Scientists Discussed Weaponising Coronavirus In 2015: Report, May 09, 2021, NVDTV.com

Wuhan doctors say they were told to lie about severity of COVID-19 in secretly filmed video, Frank Chung, JANUARY 20, 20216:43PM

"A Chinese virologist has claimed she fled Hong Kong to expose the truth about a Beijing cover-up over the initial outbreak of COVID-19.

Li-Meng Yan, a scientist at the Hong Kong School of Public Health, feared she would be killed for speaking out in China and chose to escape to the United States, where she is hiding at an undisclosed location.

According to the researcher, the Chinese Communist Party and senior university staff suppressed evidence that coronavirus could be transmitted between humans as early as last December. Dr Yan, who grew up in mainland China, said she was among the first scientists asked to investigate a small number of cases in Wuhan.

She claimed the Chinese government refused to let overseas experts, including those from Hong Kong, conduct research in China.

On December 31 she turned to her contacts on the mainland for more information, including an expert at the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. One said that there were cases of “family clusters”, indicating human-to-human transmission, she claimed.

Dr Yan said when she reported to her boss, Leo Poon, an Oxford-educated supervisor at the university, he ignored the information.

The Hong Kong centre is used by the World Health Organisation as a reference laboratory and specialises in viruses. On January 9, it released a statement supporting Chinese claims that the virus “does not transmit readily among people”.

A few weeks later Wuhan was quarantined. One study by Chinese and British experts found that had the lockdown begun at the start of the year, the number of cases could have been cut by 95 per cent, according to the Daily Mail. In a statement, the Hong Kong centre said Dr Yan’s reported comments had “no scientific basis but resembles hearsay”.
Chinese virologist ‘fled territory to tell truth’, By CHARLIE PARKER
THE TIMES,  JULY 13, 2020

"The Chinese government intentionally manufactured and released the COVID-19 virus that led to mass shutdowns and deaths across the world, a top virologist and whistleblower told Fox News host Tucker Carlson on Tuesday.

Carlson specifically asked Dr. Li-Meng Yan whether she believed the Chinese Communist Party released the virus "on purpose." "Yes, of course, it's intentionally," she responded on "Tucker Carlson Tonight.""

‘Unknown pneumonia’ deadlier than coronavirus sweeping Kazakhstan, Chinese embassy warns, Wendy Wu, 9 Jul, 2020

"Since 2017, thousands of Kazakh Muslims have been detained in China’s infamous re-education camps. Survivors who have returned to Kazakhstan, say during months of incarceration they were tortured, beaten and received unknown injections."
The Kazakh Muslims detained in China's camps, BBC, 15 Jan 2020

Welcome to Chinese Communist Party Biological warfare, driven by a system of governance-oversight which determines nothing is sacred as there is no moral code underlying the Marxist barrel of the gun except fear and preservation at all levels. Even the Chinese Communist Party rehabilitation of Confucius will not save humanity, nor the Chinese people from themselves.

Nicholas Thomas, Catherine Yuk-ping Lo, Journal of Global Security Studies, Volume 5, Issue 2, April 2020, Pages 361–378, https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogz038, Published: 26 September 2019


The defusing of bias-prejudice by the Western Marxist intellectual elite against groups of peoples, determining the individual adherent is not responsible for group outcomes, we are more alike than different, we are the same, the elites are the only ones culpable for whole of group outcomes, or worse Other are responsible for the terror, violence, crime deviance arising from groups, a rational argument of win-win rather than force will always carry the argument the day, 'lone wolf', based upon individualism argument, devoid of biology/culture ideology interdependent network conception can exist.

“relational sociology—indeed any sociology worth its salt—fundamentally challenges the purposive action basis of methodological individualism, which assumes that individuals act in order to achieve self-determined ends (Crossley 2011). This model assumes that ‘action is initiated only after meaningful goals have been set in the cognized world and then – in a separate act of will – the decision to pursue such goals has been taken’ (Joas 1996: 157). This firstly ignores that the bulk of our action is habitually enacted and intersubjectively produced in the flow of interactional practice in a way that cannot be preceded by goal-orientation (Dreyfus 2014; Taylor 1999; Heidegger 1962; Mead 1934; Schutz 1970). It also over-estimates the capacity for detached rationality, problematically obviating the role that the social plays in orienting the course of both our habitual and discursive action through the interactional moulding of our dispositions and subjectivities, which occurs in relation to social positioning and operations of power (Foucault 1998; Bourdieu 1984). This aspect of the critique of individualism is of particular significance for what follows because it correlates to some extent with the critique of why orientating morality in terms of the detached rationality of the disembedded subject, so common to how much of Enlightenment moral thought has proceeded, is problematic.” (Abbott 2020)
Abbott, O. (2020). The self, relational sociology, and morality in practice, Springer.

Claims, in the end, the pen is mightier than the sword, when before us lie the broken bodies of persons and states is a sickening indictment of the Western Arts and Education institutions and particularly the psychology-based intellectuals and institutions claiming they have a cure where there are none for Biology/Culture Ideology bias and prejudice. For it assumes resource availability without end and need are in the minds of humans capable of being differentiated from want, and worse hierarchy inherent in any social group- the power of, will not demand-assign itself more as it can and will. 

"US President Joe Biden has appeared to downplay China’s genocide of Uighur Muslims, saying “culturally there are different norms” in every country.
[...]
Mr Biden answered by relaying Mr Xi’s justification for the abuses, saying the Chinese President “gets it”.

“You know, Chinese leaders, if you know anything about Chinese history, it has always been, the time when China has been victimised by the outer world is when they haven’t been unified at home,” he said.

“So the central – it’s vastly overstated – the central principle of Xi Jinping is that there must be a united, tightly controlled China, and he uses his rationale for the things he does based on that.”"
Joe Biden suggests China’s Uighur genocide is part of ‘different cultural norms’, news.com.au, Frank Chung, FEBRUARY 18, 2021

The worst aspect of Biden's view “culturally there are different norms” which exist does not then go on to note such norms can and are the antithesis of his own culture ideology and therefore must be opposed. As culture-ideology adherents are not restricted in our globalized world, in the main, to specific geographic locations the culture-ideology normative expectation of adherents still bookends behaviors wherever the adherent resides impinged by Other culture-ideology normative expectations only to the degree the Other culture-ideology normative expectations are enforced; prevented from being circumvented.

The argument Biden utilises “culturally there are different norms” is being used to excuse Other culture-ideologies behavior not only outside but within Western Democratic boundaries, based upon the false 'victimised' phobic paradigm, which determines violent behavior of adherents from non-Western-European based biology/culture ideologies are reactive rather than derived from the internal culture-ideologies inherent negative construct of Other, and any objection or counter-violence of equivalence or less as phobic, unjustified prejudice, even blasphemy inciting rather than being a rational reaction to systemic negative behavior even terror.

 "The crime carries punishments ranging from fines to life imprisonment and, in the case of insulting the Prophet Muhammad, a mandatory death sentence.

But many cases do not even get to court. According to an Al Jazeera tally, at least 75 people have been extra-judicially killed in connection with blasphemy allegations since 1990."
Sentenced to death for blasphemy: Surviving Pakistan's death row, Al Jazeera, by Asad Hashim, 21 Feb 2020

“blasphemous to the extent that I can comment on someone else’s religion.’’. Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) director-general Duncan Lewis 2015

“Instead of responding to attacks against freedom of expression, voices were raised to decry blasphemy and to propose compromise with terrorism. There is no blasphemy in a democracy,” Mr. Rushdie said.

..the writer decried the reluctance of Western governments to use the words “Muslim” or “Islam,” preferring instead to attribute terrorist attacks to “unbalanced” people or to a generic thing like “radicalism” or “extremism,” even when the attackers themselves say Islam is their motive."
‘Satanic Verses’ author Salman Rushdie: ‘Today, I would be accused of Islamophobia, racism’ By Victor Morton - The Washington Times - Tuesday, September 6, 2016     

We have been made by the so-called good defenseless against dangerous bias-prejudice of antithesis biology/culture Ideologies such as Isalm-Muslim, and the Chinese Communist Party rationale systems, now we have dead in our streets as a direct consequence. And still, we allow the Islam-Muslim rationale system the Chinese Rationale system to deliver death with more to come to our streets. And in time as we clearly have proof we will be lucky if we survive both.

"Research from Harvard Medical School suggests that the novel coronavirus could have appeared sooner than first thought. Looking at car park data at a Wuhan hospital and internet searches for symptoms, researchers believe the virus may have started earlier than was first thought."
COVID-19: New study shows that virus may have started earlier than first thought


Cremation based estimates suggest significant under- and delayed reporting of COVID-19 epidemic data in Wuhan and China Mai He, Li Li, Louis P Dehner,  View ORCID ProfileLucia Dunn, doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.28.20116012, 

 The further claim because the Covid-19 virus is determined as natural and therefore it cannot be a biological weapon is a dangerous conclusion, for the very fact it is natural provides perfect starting cover for utilization of such a virus as a bioweapon of choice, as technology is currently available to able to determine the COVID-19 virus is "natural" and an obvious alteration of specific genetic code outside expectant change would result in severe retaliatory action.

 "..a professor of medicine at Flinders University in Adelaide claimed the virus showed some hallmarks of being lab-grown."
Lab-grown coronavirus theory batted away by Australian government
Nine News, By Mark Saunokonoko, May 25, 2020

 China Wants to End Hong Kong's Autonomy While COVID-19 Distracts the World, NEWSWEEK, BRENDAN COLE ON 5/22/20

 "But sources said the “renewed muscle-flexing” by the People’ Liberation Army "after “a long time” along the 3,488-km long Line of Actual Control (LAC), stretching from Ladakh to Arunachal Pradesh, has raised concerns among the Indian security establishment."
Several soldiers injured in clashes in Ladakh & Sikkim as border tensions flare-up between India and China, Rajat Pandit, TNN, May 11, 2020

 Hong Kong arrests and Taiwan flybys: China advances its interests during Covid-19 crisis, Helen Davidson, 26 Apr 2020 

 Vietnam protests Beijing's expansion in disputed South China Sea as world remains occupied with coronavirus, 20 April 2020,


This is really the worst attack we've ever had," Trump told reporters. "This is worse than Pearl Harbor. This is worse than the World Trade Center."
China slams US after Trump virus 'attack' claim, AFP, 8-5-2020

"Substantial alterations to the Wuhan Institute of Virology database on the evening of December 30, the day before the World Health Organisation was altered to the outbreak of a cluster of pneumonia cases in Wuhan, are just another indication that the Chinese Communist Party is hiding something when it comes to the origins of COVID-19." 
DOCTORED BAT LAB DATA, Miranda Devine, The Daily Telegraph, 8-May-2020

"The CIA believes China tried to prevent the World Health Organization from sounding the alarm on the coronavirus outbreak in January—a time when Beijing was stockpiling medical supplies from around the world. A CIA report, the contents of which were confirmed to Newsweek by two U.S. intelligence officials, said China threatened the WHO that the country would stop cooperating with the agency's coronavirus investigation if the organization declared a global health emergency.

 It was the second such report from a Western intelligence service and is likely to further inflame tensions between the United States and China over a pandemic that has killed 280,000 people worldwide—more than a quarter of them American.

 The first report, a German intelligence assessment published by Der Spiegel last week, accused Chinese President Xi Jinping of personally applying pressure on WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus on January 21.

The WHO dismissed the notion that Xi himself intervened, but declined to address specifically the question of whether Chinese officials made any effort to delay or change the announcement of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC)."
EXCLUSIVE: AS CHINA HOARDED MEDICAL SUPPLIES, THE CIA BELIEVES IT TRIED TO STOP THE WHO FROM SOUNDING THE ALARM ON THE PANDEMIC, Newsweek, BY NAVEED JAMALI AND TOM O'CONNOR ON 5/12/20

 "China destroyed the earliest samples of the novel coronavirus, a health official in Beijing acknowledged.

 “Based on comprehensive research and expert opinion, we decided to temporarily manage the pathogen causing the pneumonia as Class II — highly pathogenic — and imposed biosafety requirements on sample collection, transport, and experimental activities, as well as destroying the samples,” the National Health Commission’s Liu Dengfeng told reporters.

 That statement comes in the wake of demands from Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who has cited the unavailability of the virus samples to argue that the Chinese Communist Party is flouting international transparency regulations at the expense of global public health.

“China didn’t share all of the information it had,” Pompeo told reporters last month. "It censored those who tried to warn the world, it ordered a halt to testing of new samples, and it destroyed existing samples. The CCP still has not shared the virus sample from inside of China with the outside world, making it impossible to track the disease’s evolution.”
[...]
The virus samples were destroyed after a flurry of tests in late December that “all pointed to a dangerous SARS-like virus,” according to a report from an independent Chinese media outlet, Caixin Global.

 “That was days before China notified the World Health Organization (WHO) on Dec. 31 about the emergence of an unidentified infectious disease, two weeks before it shared the virus’s genome sequence with the world, and crucially, more than three weeks before Chinese authorities confirmed publicly that the virus was spreading between people,” Caixin Global noted."
China admits to destroying early virus samples sought by Pompeo
by Joel Gehrke, Washington Examiner, May 15, 2020

 There is no such thing as a State actor or non-State actor there are only Biology/Culture Ideology systemic emergent altruist-actors whose beliefs, cognitions, behavior are a product of the many Biology/Culture Ideology development rationale system. The few are the many and the many the few. There is an answer for the solving of terrorism its the removal of the many+few Biology/Culture Ideology development rationale system. 

"Historically, only nation-states have had the capacity and resources to develop weapons of mass destruction (WMD) due to the significant capital, infrastructure, and intellectual capacity required to develop and maintain a WMD program. In recent years, however, this paradigm has been shifting, particularly for non-state actors."
Small Groups, Big Weapons: The Nexus of Emerging Technologies and Weapons of Mass Destruction Terrorism, Combating Terrorism Center, STEPHEN HUMMEL, F. JOHN BURPO, APRIL 02, 2020

Marx, Lenin,... Chinese Communist Party understands this truth, each Biology/Culture Ideology to survive requires the removal of anthesis Biology/Culture Ideologies, Biology/Culture Ideology determines we are not more alike than different and we, therefore, cannot all live in harmony. Any let live agreement is a pause to gather enough time, resources to finish the task. Certain Ideologies such as Marxism, Islam lead inexorably to Biology/Culture Ideologies with severely restricted behavioral, relationship, belief variance which informs relatively intolerant attitudes and behavior internally and externally, as Other's Ideology informs antithesis beliefs, political/social rationale systems challenging the veracity of the core assumptions(beliefs) behaviors leading to potential revolt, defection, as adherents tend to flow to the less draconian rationale which contains less pain-threat-violence (heat).

China as a communist rationale networked system has intentionally acted to cause great harm to Other, in a war they have never ceased waging since their conception. There are only ever dissimulating lulls of claims of intended mutual benefit and abused international agreements.  COVID-19 is a biowarfare attack camouflaged as a 'normal' pandemic. Under the auspices of the United Nations the World Health Organisation unquestioning head, established there by Chinese influence, has enabled this Chinese Communist party created biowarfare virus pandemic to spread. 

 It may have been a mistaken release initially, despite the Chinese Communist Parties' direction to develop such weapons for exactly what is occurring now, but everything which the Chines communist Regime have and are doing subsequently has determined COVID-19 as an opportunity to wreak havoc against enemy Biology/Culture Ideologies at the terrible cost of their own citizens and the rest of the world. 

As the American Secretary of State has said this is not the first time Chinese Communist Regime has released a dangerous virus from their labs and tried to camouflage viruses existence, and threat until too late for Other to prevent viruses incursion into Others space, and also it is not the first time the Chinese Communist Regime has been willing to sacrifice their own citizens to the ravages of their own political-dogma ambitions be it internal or external. One must, therefore, not judge the capacity of another Biology/Culture Ideology propensity to inform evil, based upon your own Biology/Culture Ideologies belief system which would never countenance such behavior.

China reports 109 new COVID-19 cases as Government claims virus is found in ice cream, ABC, 18-1-2021

 How China is covering up the 30th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre | DW News, Jun 3, 2019

 "In the video, Xingguang Church attendees were seen as they attempted to block the entrance as police "officers confiscated phones and used brutal force against some Christian women as well," the group reports."
Violence erupts as Chinese officials raid Christian church, drag out members, Fox News, Caleb Parke, 8-5-2020


What one looks for in a biowarfare attack.
·       Deniability, management of information, type of bioagent, i.e. possible natural agent or as close to, and expected source, space own or Other.
·       Highly contagious phenomenon, poorly understood and unpredictable, an epidemiologist’s nightmare leading to dangerous medical conditions:
·       Purposefully enabling spread into other biology/culture Ideology space:
·       Silencing:
·       Military quarantined:
·       Release in enclosed minimal personal space:
·       Debilitating Government and citizen, focus on combating the epidemic, potentially threatening military communication and casualties, drawing focus and resources away from potential military attack either home or against overseas interests.
·       Military crossing into Others territory:
·       Prior evidence of policy directives, and actual involvement in the development of biological agents for military use:
·       Restrict access to critical medical supplies, thwart, hinder the development of virus countermeasures, required for containing the virus.
·       Warning allies so they can be prepared to take advantage of security failures, protect critical personnel assets, and wait and evaluate cracks in the enemy's defences.

·       Previous testing of infection utilised against specific targets of persons, peoples regarded as enemies of the State or of peoples so removed from outside observation and so wrought with other problems as not to be noticed.
·       Spreading disorder and dissension within targeted countries, triggering panic buying, financing purchase, hoarding, exporting for own home use of resources necessary for addressing the outbreak, claiming the restriction of persons own and other potentially with the disease a human rights crime.
·      Threatening enemies with the military, economic consequences of challenging the narrative of a 'normal', non-subterfuge, release of the bioweapon.

Deniability, management of information, type of bioagent, ie possible natural agent or as close to, and expected source, space own or Other.
"A Department of Homeland Security (DHS) intelligence report dated last week accuses China of intentionally downplaying the threat of the coronavirus to stock up on medical supplies, The Associated Press reported.

Chinese governmental leaders “intentionally concealed the severity” of the coronavirus from other countries in early January, according to the DHS report obtained by the AP.

The report details that China increased its imports and reduced its exports of medical supplies, adding there was a 95 percent probability the trade behavior was not within a normal range.

Analysis showed the country attempted to cover up the changes in trade by “denying there were export restrictions and obfuscating and delaying provision of its trade data,” according to the AP.

China also refrained from telling the World Health Organization that the virus “was a contagion” for most of January to gather an increase of supplies like face masks, surgical gowns and gloves from overseas."

 China celebrates coronavirus response in propaganda manifesto, Sky.news.com, 13-5-2020

"In summary, somebody was entangled with the evolution of 2019-nCoV coronavirus. In addition to origins of natural recombination and intermediate host, the killer coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory in Wuhan. Safety level may need to be reinforced in high risk biohazardous laboratories. Regulations may be taken to relocate these laboratories far away from city center and other densely populated places."
The possible origins of 2019-nCoV coronavirus, Botao Xiao1,2* and Lei Xiao3, Preprint · February 2020, DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21799.29601

"Mr Zhao, in tweets in both Mandarin and English that gained wide traction on Chinese social media, a day earlier suggested that "patient zero" in the global pandemic may have come from the US - not the Chinese metropolis of Wuhan, where cases were first reported in late 2019.

"It might be US army who brought the epidemic to Wuhan. Be transparent! Make public your data! US owe us an explanation," tweeted Mr Zhao, who is known for his provocative statements on social media."
US summons Chinese ambassador over 'dangerous and ridiculous' COVID-19 conspiracy theory, SBS, 14-3-2020

"The release of the guideline deals with chronic loopholes at laboratories, Yang Zhanqiu, a deputy director of the pathogen biology department at Wuhan University in Hubei Province, told the Global Times on Sunday.
"The mention of biosafety at labs by the ministry has nothing to do with some saying that the coronavirus leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences," Yang said.
Laboratories in China have paid insufficient attention to biological disposal, Yang said.
[...]
All the evidence shows the virus similar to a bat coronavirus and Chinese experts say it most likely originated at the Wuhan Huanan seafood market. "

“The entire Intelligence Community has been consistently providing critical support to U.S. policymakers and those responding to the COVID-19 virus, which originated in China. The Intelligence Community also concurs with the wide scientific consensus that the COVID-19 virus was not manmade or genetically modified."
WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Office of the Director of National Intelligence today issued the following Intelligence Community (IC) statement:, ODNI News Release No. 11-20, April 30, 2020

If the consensus is, a high probability the developed coronavirus jumped species to form COVID-19, and an experiment carried out purposefully in a Chinese Lab utilised that species then COVID-19 is man-made, it has been genetically engineered.

The further claim because the Covid-19 virus is determined as natural and therefore it cannot be a biological weapon is a dangerous conclusion, for the very fact it is natural provides perfect starting cover for utilization of such a virus as a bioweapon of choice, as technology is currently available to able to determine the COVID-19 virus is "natural" and an obvious alteration of specific genetic code outside expectant change would result in severe retaliatory action.

 "The novel coronavirus is not an ideal biological warfare agent, experts say, because its impact on the United States and adversaries alike cannot be controlled. But China refuses to help the world answer questions about its origin.

"“Coronavirus would be a bad candidate to be a bioweapon,” said Thomas Spoehr, head of the Center for National Defense at the Heritage Foundation, who was the U.S. Army’s senior-most officer for chemical and biological weapons during his 36-year military career."
Fears of biological warfare linger, while experts say coronaviruses cannot be controlled, by Abraham Mahshie, Washington Examiner, March 31, 2020

The fact is if the Chinese Communist Party data can be believed and even if not the psychological consequences internal and external determine control and as long as the military integrity is preserved the virus is being controlled. As well the attack objectives may not even be aimed at ultimate military supremacy initially at least, but be aimed at a strategy of progressive weakening of the enemy, for the Democratic States individual ethics are the antithesis of the Chinese Communist Party Regime social/political rational system-there is a war in progress until either one or the other as Lincoln rightly determined takes the whole social-political space.

My view is the Chinese Communist Party knew the potential harm this could do its adversaries and sought to protect itself whilst leaving the West vulnerable by restricting critical medical supplies, even having its agents in Western Countries supposedly citizens to those countries betraying their own countries trust sending critical supplies to China, such traitorous behavior must be legislated against.

It could be cages with/without test animals were sold to/obtained by the Wuhan animal market, or test animals dead or alive were obtained by the Wuhan animal markets from the virus lab in Wuhan with the COVID-19 virus. Or the virus lab in Wuhan used test animals which enabled the COVID-19 to be created, then the question is was it released on purpose and if not when the Chinese Communist party found out about the release did they seek to take advantage of the fact and prepare their own defenses whilst restricting others, by refuting the fact the virus was easily transmissible and abusing those intending to restrict access to their nations of potential COVID_19 carriers. if this is the case this is a biowarfare attack.

China must be made to pay by reversing the destructive trend of Chinese ownership of foreign assets, manufacturing, and demanding compensation. The Chinese communist regime cannot be trusted in fact is outright dangerous to Western Democracies.

"Experts from the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said tests confirmed the virus first jumped from animals to humans inside the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in the heart of city, according to China’s state-owned Xinhua news agency.
[...]
“The result suggests that the novel coronavirus outbreak is highly relevant to the trading of the wild animals,” experts said.

"US officials have also raised concerns about Beijing’s management of the outbreak, and have said their offers to send American health experts into China with a WHO-led team were not accepted.

White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow told reporters on Thursday that the US was “a little disappointed that we haven’t been invited in, and we’re a little disappointed in the lack of transparency coming from the Chinese”"
Coronavirus: China accuses US of ‘dark mentality and dangerous action’, South China Morning Post, Sarah Zheng, 17 Feb, 2020.

Highly contagious phenomenon, poorly understood and unpredictable, an epidemiologist’s nightmare leading to dangerous medical conditions:

"Reporting on Friday in JAMA, the authors said their data suggested that rapid person-to-person spread of the virus had occurred among their cases. That was in part because of patients like the one admitted to the surgical department, whose symptoms misled doctors into suspecting other illnesses and failing to take precautions to prevent spread of the virus until it was too late.”

"coronavirus has proved contagious in the early days of infection when patients have few symptoms, making it hard to identify carriers as clusters spread."
China encourages citizens to return to work as coronavirus hits economy, The Guardian, Emma Graham-Harrison and Michael Standaert, 23 Feb 2020

Purposefully enabling spread into other biology/culture Ideology space:


"When Dr. Li posted his chat room warning on Dec. 30, the new coronavirus had not yet been identified. He said it resembled Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, or SARS, an earlier coronavirus that ravaged China nearly two decades ago.

 WUHAN, China —  He was the doctor who tried to sound a warning that a troubling cluster of viral infections in a Chinese province could grow out of control — and was then summoned for a middle-of-the-night reprimand over his candor.

 On Friday, the doctor, Li Wenliang, died after contracting the very illness he had told medical school classmates about in an online chat room, the coronavirus. He joined the more than 600 other Chinese who have died in an outbreak that has now spread across the globe.

 Dr. Li “had the misfortune to be infected during the fight against the novel coronavirus pneumonia epidemic, and all-out efforts to save him failed,” the Wuhan City Central Hospital said on Weibo, the Chinese social media service. “We express our deep regret and condolences.”

 Even before his death, Dr. Li had become a hero to many Chinese after word of his treatment at the hands of the authorities emerged. In early January, he was called in by both medical officials and the police, and forced to sign a statement denouncing his warning as an unfounded and illegal rumor."
Chinese Doctor, Silenced After Warning of Outbreak, Dies From Coronavirus, By Chris Buckley, NYT, Feb. 6, 2020

 "One of the first foreign infectious disease experts to gain access to the Chinese city of Wuhan – the original epicentre of the Covid-19 outbreak – was told by a Beijing official on January 13 that “limited human to human transmission cannot be excluded.”

 The statement made to Chuang Yin-ching, a senior official working for Taiwan’s Centres for Disease Control, is thought to be the earliest acknowledgement that the pandemic which has now wreaked havoc across the world was already underway."Taiwanese official reveals China suspected 'human to human' transmission by January 13, The Telegraph, By Nicola Smith, 6 May 2020

"14 January 2020
WHO's technical lead for the response noted in a press briefing there may have been limited human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus (in the 41 confirmed cases), mainly through family members, and that there was a risk of a possible wider outbreak. The lead also said that human-to-human transmission would not be surprising given our experience with SARS, MERS and other respiratory pathogens.  

 20-21 January 2020
WHO experts from its China and Western Pacific regional offices conducted a brief field visit to Wuhan.
22 January 2020

WHO mission to China issued a statement saying that there was evidence of human-to-human transmission in Wuhan but more investigation was needed to understand the full extent of transmission."
WHO Timeline - COVID-19, 27 April 2020 Statement

 "China's Ambassador to Australia was spotted at Parliament House multiple times in the days leading up to Thursday's decision to extend the travel ban.

 His embassy, in a statement, expressed its "deep regret and dissatisfaction" at the travel ban extension."
Coronavirus travel ban extended to 'keep Australians safe', Peter Dutton insists amid Chinese 'dissatisfaction', ABC, 14 February 2020

"Ms Harris said the disease was rampant and highly-infectious in February so it was unsafe for the WHO experts to travel to Wuhan.

The fact-finding mission went from February 10 until February 24, 2020."
World Health Organisation admits it never probed Chinese wet markets or labs, Sky News, 1-6-2020

"Take the Chinese government’s attitude towards the other nations during the coronavirus outbreak, for example. Even though China was an infected area with tens of hundreds of deaths, they demanded that other countries keep their borders open for Chinese travellers. Because China makes large contributions to the economy of numerous countries, it thinks other countries ought to listen to it, even putting the Chinese before their own citizens."
Racism against Chinese: could arrogance have a role to play?, South China Morning Post, Kyle Wong, Tseung Kwan, 11-4-2020

 "But it wasn’t until Thursday that the F.D.A. barred more than 65 of the 80 authorized manufacturers in China from exporting N95-style face masks to the United States for medical use, citing poor quality."
F.D.A. Bans Faulty Masks, 3 Weeks After Failed Tests, NYT, Jack Nicas and Sheila Kaplan, May 7, 2020

 "One of the key players in the April 8 flight from Wuhan, Australian-based red meat trader Eddie Zhi, told The Age he supplied the Melbourne meat company with 2000 face masks sourced from his Chinese network at the same time he bought 35 tonnes of mutton from Cedar Meats to send back on the return flight.
The timing of Mr Zhi’s delivery of face masks to Cedar Meats’ abattoir, based in the Melbourne suburb of Brooklyn, coincided with the first positive test result in one of its workers on April 2.
[...]
The masks Mr Zhi supplied to Cedar Meats were imported from China on an earlier flight."
Wuhan cargo flown in by Cedar Meats-linked trader yet to clear customs, The AGE, By Richard Baker, May 8, 2020 

 "French officials said the British national – reported to be a middle-aged man from Brighton – arrived in the resort of Contamines-Montjoie, near Mont Blanc, on 24 January and returned to England on 28 January.
The conference at the Grand Hyatt hotel in Singapore, held earlier in January, is believed to have been attended by 15 people from Singapore and 94 foreigners, and hosted by a multinational company. The Singaporean evening daily paper Lianhe Wanbao named the company as UK firm Servomex, a global gas analysis company with offices in Europe and Asia."
Hunt for coronavirus carriers as trail leads from Singapore to UK and France, The Guardian, Jamie Doward and Kim Willsher, Sun 9 Feb 2020  

Silencing:
"Dr. Li Wenliang issued a warning about a strange new virus. Then the authorities summoned him for questioning."

“The disclosure indicates top leaders knew about the outbreak’s potential severity weeks before such dangers were made known to the public. It was not until late January that officials said the virus can spread between humans and public alarm began to rise.”

Military quarantined:
"China has the world’s largest army but it has not deployed any field hospitals to Wuhan."

Release in enclosed minimal personal space:
"The man allegedly failed to disclose he had symptoms of an upper respiratory infection before he entered Taiwan, in violation of the infection control law. He is also said to have visited a Kaohsiung dance club without wearing a surgical mask."
Taiwan fines coronavirus patient $10,000 for 'hiding' illness, KENSAKU IHARA, ASIAN REVIEW, JANUARY 26, 2020

Debilitating Government and citizen, focus on combating the epidemic, potentially threatening military communication and casualties, drawing focus and resources away from potential military attack either home or against overseas interests.

Military crossing into Others territory:
"On Monday, Chinese jets crossed an unofficial middle line in the Taiwan Strait, just a day after Chinese fighters and bombers flew around the island."

Prior evidence of policy directives, and actual involvement in the development of biological agents for military use:

"A team of scientists in China has created hybrid viruses by mixing genes from H5N1 and the H1N1 strain behind the 2009 swine flu pandemic, and showed that some of the hybrids can spread through the air between guinea pigs. The results are published in Science."
Scientists create hybrid flu that can go airborne, Nature, Ed Yong
02 May 2013

"But Ebright is not convinced of the need for more than one BSL-4 lab in mainland China. He suspects that the expansion there is a reaction to the networks in the United States and Europe, which he says are also unwarranted. He adds that governments will assume that such excess capacity is for the potential development of bioweapons."
Inside the Chinese lab poised to study world's most dangerous pathogens, Nature, David Cyranoski, 22 February 2017 Updated: 23 February 2017, Wuhan, China

"In 2010’s War for Biological Dominance (制生权战争), Guo Jiwei (郭继卫), a professor with the Third Military Medical University, emphasizes the impact of biology on future warfare.

In 2015, then-president of the Academy of Military Medical Sciences He Fuchu (贺福初) argued that biotechnology will become the new “strategic commanding heights” of national defense, from biomaterials to “brain control” weapons. Maj. Gen. He has since become the vice president of the Academy of Military Sciences, which leads China’s military science enterprise.

Biology is among seven “new domains of warfare” discussed in a 2017 book by Zhang Shibo (张仕波), a retired general and former president of the National Defense University, who concludes: “Modern biotechnology development is gradually showing strong signs characteristic of an offensive capability,” including the possibility that “specific ethnic genetic attacks” (特定种族基因攻击) could be employed.

The 2017 edition of Science of Military Strategy (战略学), a textbook published by the PLA’s National Defense University that is considered to be relatively authoritative, debuted a section about biology as a domain of military struggle, similarly mentioning the potential for new kinds of biological warfare to include “specific ethnic genetic attacks.”

Developing influence in a world health organizations elite, to thwart effective examination of contrary claims of the severity, threat of a bioattack.

"China's President Xi Jinping has backed a comprehensive review of the global response to the coronavirus, but has stopped short of endorsing an independent probe advocated for by Australia and the European Union.
In a highly anticipated speech to the World Health Assembly on Monday evening, Xi said any review should be conducted by the World Health Organisation and only after the pandemic had passed."
Xi Jinping backs 'comprehensive review' of COVID-19, SMH, By Eryk Bagshaw and Latika Bourke, May 18, 2020

The very enablers of the catastrophe to manage the timing and the nature of the review.

"China was also an important ally of Tedros in the WHO’s DG election in 2017. Months before the election, Tedros was invited to speak at Peking University where he called for stronger cooperation between China and the Global South on health issues. China’s support for Tedros paid off immediately. The day after his electoral victory, Tedros confirmed to Chinese state-media that he and the WHO will continue to support the “One China” principle, which recognizes the government in Beijing as the legitimate Chinese government. Three years later, Tedros’ enduring support of China’s response to COVID-19 shows that their early support for him is still paying dividends.
[...]Dr. Tedros’ inaction stands in stark contrast to the WHO’s actions during the 2003 SARS outbreak in China. Then WHO DG Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland made history by declaring the WHO’s first travel advisory in 55 years which recommended against travel to and from the disease epicenter in southern China. Dr. Brundtland also criticized China for endangering global health by attempting to cover up the outbreak through its usual playbook of arresting whistleblowers and censoring media."
The WHO and China: Dereliction of Duty, Blog Post by Michael Collins, February 27, 2020

 "There has been recrimination, too, aimed at the WHO. While they may not use Trump's harsh rhetoric, many expert observers feel the agency was at least far too credulous in believing Beijing's reassurances, which it then amplified uncritically to the wider world.

 The most notorious example was a Jan. 14 tweet from the WHO that read, "Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel #coronavirus."

 Under particular scrutiny is the WHO's director-general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

 He heaped praise on Beijing's coronavirus response even while there was evidence Chinese authorities had under-reported cases and attempted to silence those sounding the alarm.
Tedros, 55, who like many Ethiopians goes by his first name, has been accused of kowtowing to undemocratic regimes before."
Coronavirus blame game threatens to mar World Health Assembly, NBC news, Alexander Smith, 18-5-2020

Restrict access to critical medical supplies, thwart, hinder the development of virus countermeasures, required for containing the virus.
"'It could cost lives in this country'
As Australian supermarkets are stripped bare and frontline health workers struggle with a lack of vital equipment, pallet-loads of groceries and medical supplies are being shipped overseas.

When A Current Affair visited one Melbourne export warehouse today, a worker said products – including medications, long-life milk, baby formula and bathroom supplies – were destined for places like Hong Kong, Thailand and China."

"The United States and United Kingdom issued a new advisory Tuesday warning of ongoing cyberattacks against organizations involved in the coronavirus response, including health care bodies, pharmaceutical companies, academics, medical research organizations and local government.
These malicious actors "frequently target organizations in order to collect bulk personal information, intellectual property and intelligence that aligns with national priorities," according to the UK's National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) and the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).
"The pandemic has likely raised additional requirements for APT actors to gather information related to COVID-19. For example, actors may seek to obtain intelligence on national and international healthcare policy or acquire sensitive data on COVID-19 related research," the advisory says.
APTs are generally hacking groups sponsored by foreign governments and Monday's alert suggests that supply chains may be especially vulnerable. "Actors view supply chains as a weak link that they can exploit to obtain access to better protected targets. CISA and NCSC have seen 'APT' actors scanning the external web sites of targeted companies looking for vulnerabilities in unpatched software," according to the advisory."

"A Department of Homeland Security (DHS) intelligence report dated last week accuses China of intentionally downplaying the threat of the coronavirus to stock up on medical supplies, The Associated Press reported.

Chinese governmental leaders “intentionally concealed the severity” of the coronavirus from other countries in early January, according to the DHS report obtained by the AP.

The report details that China increased its imports and reduced its exports of medical supplies, adding there was a 95 percent probability the trade behavior was not within a normal range.

Analysis showed the country attempted to cover up the changes in trade by “denying there were export restrictions and obfuscating and delaying provision of its trade data,” according to the AP.

China also refrained from telling the World Health Organization that the virus “was a contagion” for most of January to gather an increase of supplies like face masks, surgical gowns and gloves from overseas"

Warning allies so they can be prepared to take advantage of security failures, protect critical personnel assets, and wait and evaluate cracks in the enemy's defenses.
"The principal ministers of the Russian government, from Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev on down, resigned Wednesday in a move designed to ease a constitutional overhaul recently proposed by President Vladimir Putin. The president accepted Medvedev's resignation and said he would appoint his longtime loyalist to the Russian Security Council.

Putin also nominated Mikhail Mishustin, head of the Federal Tax Service, to replace Medvedev as prime minister, according to Russia's state-run Tass news agency. The rest of the ministerial Cabinet is expected to remain until their replacements are determined."

"The commander of a US Navy ship has been removed from his position after he warned of a COVID-19 outbreak aboard the aircraft carrier.
Captain Brett Crozier, who commands the USS Theodore Roosevelt, an aircraft carrier with a crew of nearly 5000, sent a letter to Navy leadership that detailed his concerns about the spread of the virus on the ship.

"We are not at war. Sailors do not need to die," Capt. Crozier said in the letter."

Although one empathises with the captain's concerns, the fact is Captain Brett Crozier's understanding of the reality of any Biology/Culture Ideology with diametrically opposed Biology/Culture Ideology rationale systems in the same political/social geographic space ignores a reality you are always at war, admitting a vulnerability of the very means of defending one's Biology/Culture Ideology is a dangerous and naive act. The captain and his supporters need to understand they have to suffer in silence not demanded of their fellow citizens in a Democracy that is their assigned script and role. We are always at war.

This virus from the very beginning had to be treated as an intentional biological attack emanating from Communist China at the very least by the military, as potential utilisation of such a bioweapon has been a directed research objective of Communist China, so even if it was not intentionally released Communist China would be looking for exactly the developing vulnerability of the US military before launching an attack, even in this case, determining the US military would have probably lost its focus in Other areas as well.

The captain deserved to be relieved of command for his complete misunderstanding of the fact he and his crew are always at war.

“The lessons here are:
…..
(c) That peace cannot be brought by appeasement; that it is far better in the long run to challenge at an early stage rather than allow an aggressor to go on from strength to strength until the inevitable war begins with the defender at a dangerous disadvantage.
…
If you make the deductions from your intelligence reports fit your preconceived notions about what the enemy is or ought to be doing, you are almost bound to be surprised.”
MIDDLE EAST 1939-43, DIRECTORATE OF MILITARY TRAINING, Military Board Army Headquarters, Melbourne, 31/8/1959

Training or worse, a country that can develop the means to effectively contain a viral outbreak in its own space, in the new dangerous world of #biowarfare, to disable-kill the enemy culture Ideology and preserve their infrastructure whilst dissimulating under a 'natural' event. =

We know from history and current events Communist China will do whatever it takes to retain and advance their power even at the terrible cost of its own citizens. And such a scenario of release of such a virus in their own space to deny culpability and deflect swift response is not as crazy as it appears from a Western Democratic perspective.

Silencing any internal realisation of the threat to its own citizens until it takes enough hold to spread into Others space. Yes, I have little faith in certain Biology/Culture Ideologies respect for their own or Other. Why?

"The use of force and violence is more commonplace and prevalent in some families, communities, religions, cultural/ethnic groups and societies based on the views and values about adult prerogatives with children espoused. They may also be based upon the sociopathy of the perpetrators." Treatment of Complex Trauma Courtois/Ford 2016

"The Chinese Communist Party has once again proved that authoritarianism is dangerous — not just for human rights but also for public health."
Warning: Chinese authoritarianism is hazardous to your health, Yje Washington Post, Chen Guangcheng, Feb. 7, 2020

"Xiangguo Qiu — who was escorted out of the Winnipeg lab in July amid an RCMP investigation into what's being described by Public Health Agency of Canada as a possible "policy breach" — was invited to go to the Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory of the Chinese Academy of Sciences twice a year for two years, for up to two weeks each time."
Canadian government scientist under investigation trained staff at Level 4 lab in China, Karen Pauls - CBC News, October 03, 2019

"Citizens blame officials for claiming for weeks that the virus was manageable and ignoring as well as covering up obvious signs that the outbreak was serious. ...

A doctor in Wuhan, who tried to warn colleagues and friends about the virus in December before being silenced by police, said on Saturday that he had been infected.

Li Wenliang, an ophthalmologist at Wuhan central hospital, was one of eight doctors that local police punished for “rumour-mongering” when they attempted to sound the alarm about the virus in December, weeks before officials admitted the seriousness of the outbreak.

“Everything is settled now. It’s finally confirmed,” Li wrote on Weibo, delivering news that angered yet more Chinese. He wrote in another post: “I have seen a lot of support and encouragement for me online, which has really helped my emotional state. Thank you everyone.”
Fury in China as footage appears to show officials taking doctors' face masks, The Guardian, Lily Kuo in Beijing, Mon 3 Feb 2020

Previous testing of infection utilised against specific targets of persons, peoples regarded as enemies of the State or of peoples so removed from outside observation and so wrought with other problems as not to be noticed.

Spreading disorder and dissension within targeted countries, triggering panic buying, financing purchase, hoarding, exporting for own home use of resources necessary for addressing the outbreak, claiming the restriction of persons own and other potentially with the disease a human rights crime.

"Beijing is using the pandemic to drive wedges between members of the European Union, and to advance its propaganda war against the United States."
How China is Exploiting the Coronavirus to Weaken Democracies, Foreign Policy, BY PETER ROUGH | MARCH 25, 2020, 7:09 PM

Yes, I could be wrong now but clearly, China has shown its intent and 'unscrupulous' Communist Marx frame of mind to reveal its intention to utilise such horrific weapons to further its megalomaniac ambition.

#China refused to release the isolated #coronavirus, Australia had to do it-did not inform the world earlier preventing early preventative measures-has a biowarfare lab right were the coronavirus appeared Predicted Poss. biowarfare ploy. #WHO #CIA is it?

Is this another 'accident' perpetrated by a megalomaniac Culture Ideology?
"China’s People’s Liberation Army has been involved in scientific research, co-funded by the Australian government, into the origins of the coronavirus which has been published in esteemed medical journals.

 In an explosive revelation, a study co-funded by the Australian Research Council and the Chinese government, and trumpeted by The University of Sydney as helping to solve the puzzle of how COVID-19 transferred from animals to humans, relied on a key laboratory in an institute in the People’s Liberation Army’s Academy of Military Medical Sciences to conduct its “genetic sequencing” and “virus isolation”.
The director of the microbiology institute, Professor Wu-Chan Cao, who is thanked in the paper’s acknowledgments for his “substantial contribution”, has the rank of colonel and is a Wuhan Institute of Virology board member in a clear conflict of interest.

 One of the study’s co-authors, Yi-Gang Tong, began working in the same PLA-run microbiology institute in 2005.

 The Wuhan Institute of Virology is at the centre of a global probe into whether the naturally-occurring coronavirus was accidentally released from its laboratory or came from a local wet market, which scientists believe is the most likely scenario.

 This study is one of two scientific papers on the coronavirus undertaken by University of Sydney virologist and evolutionary biologist, Professor Edward Holmes in conjunction with researchers in China, who received funding from the Chinese government.

 Professor Holmes is highly regarded in his field and the only western scientist that was part of the consortium of the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Centre and School of Public Health who first uploaded the genetic sequence of the coronavirus on January 11.

 ARMY FACILITIES
Professor Holmes has used this research to call for a ban on wet markets and the trade in wildlife.

 The study titled “Identifying SARS-CoV-2 related coronaviruses in Malayan pangolins” was completed and submitted by February 7, 2020 and it was peer-reviewed and published in Nature online on March 26.

 “Although bats are likely reservoir hosts for SARS-CoV-2, the identity of any intermediate host that might have facilitated transfer to humans is unknown,” the study states in its summary.

 “Here we report the identification of SARS-CoV-2 relate coronaviruses in Malayan pangolins seized in anti-smuggling operations in southern China.”

 The Daily Telegraph can reveal that the “sequencing” and “virus isolation” on which the study relied was done by laboratories run by the PLA in China.

 In fine print at the very end of the paper in the acknowledgments section, it states: “We thank Prof. Wu-Chun Cao, Dr. Na Jia, Dr. Ya-Wei Zhang, Dr. Jia-Fu Jiang, Dr. Bao-Gui Jiang, and their team in State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Beijing for their substantial contributions to this study, including co-ordinating among research parties, conducting virus isolation, qPCR and sequencing.”

 The State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity is part of the Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, which sits under the Academy of Military Medical Sciences.
The Academy of Military Sciences is the highest-level research institute of the People’s Liberation Army.

 RANKING RESEARCHER
The director of the Beijing Institute is Professor Wu-Chan Cao, who also received the top acknowledgment in the research paper for his “substantial contributions to this study” including “co-ordinating among research parties”.

 In his official biography he is pictured in his military uniform and it states he has the “rank of colonel”.

 “Now the director of the Institute of Microbiology and epidemiology, Military Medical Science Academy of the PLA, director of the State Key Laboratory of pathogen and Biosecurity,” it states.

 Colonel Cao also sits on the board for the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s Scientific Advisory Committee of Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases, according to its website.

 A University of Sydney spokeswoman said Professor Holmes’ work was “academically independent” and that he had not received any research or personal funding from the Chinese Government or Chinese companies or institutions.
“Where he has undertaken research with scientists from China his work has been funded by the Australian Research Council, the National Health and Medical Research Council and the University of Sydney,” she said.

 “We strongly defend the right of our researchers to collaborate with scientists around the world in line with all relevant Australian laws and government guidelines.

 “Prof Holmes has no link with the Academy of Military Science. Their involvement with the research was declared in the acknowledgments, as is standard practice.

 “Dr Cao co-ordinated the laboratory work before Prof Holmes’ involvement. He did not direct or supervise the work of Prof Holmes which was undertaken independently.”

 The University of Sydney website states: “Professor Holmes, a co-author, is the only non-China based academic on the paper.”

 Another co-authored paper by Professor Holmes, published in Cell, provides commentary on samples taken from the Wuhan wet market and states “not all of the early (COVID-19) were market associated, it is possible that the emergence story is more complicated than first suspected”.
This was cited in a press release by the Embassy of the People’s Republic of China in the Commonwealth in Australia that criticised media coverage “playing up the so-called wet market in China”.

 WORRYING LINKS
Charles Sturt University Professor of Public Ethics Clive Hamilton supported the calls for an oversight agency by Morrison government MPs.

 While there was no doubting the honesty and professionalism of Australian researchers, legitimate questions should be asked as to the involvement of the Chinese military.

 “It’s clear that the universities are not properly overseeing the kinds of collaborations that their scientists are undertaking because there are many instances of sensitive research in Australian universities being done in collaboration with Chinese scientists with links to China’s military or who are likely passing valuable information on to China’s companies or intelligence ­services,” he said.

 “Universities have been very reluctant to admit there is a problem and have consistently hidden behind the Defence Trade Controls Act which prohibits the export of sensitive technology but does not prohibit Chinese military scientists working on sensitive projects in Australian laboratories.”
The Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s analysis of Chinese institutions has designated the Academy of Military Science very high risk as the PLA’s premier institution for military science. It is ­responsible for leading and co-ordinating military science for the whole military."
The Covid Files: How the Red Army oversaw coronavirus research
Sharri Markson and Ashleigh Gleeson, The Daily Telegraph

May 11, 2020 12:29pm

"In an explosive interview Dr. Francis Boyle, who drafted the Biological Weapons Act has given a detailed statement admitting that the 2019 Wuhan Coronavirus is an offensive Biological Warfare Weapon and that the World Health Organization (WHO) already knows about it.

Francis Boyle is a professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law. He drafted the U.S. domestic implementing legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention, known as the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, that was approved unanimously by both Houses of the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President George H.W. Bush."
BioWeapons Expert Says Coronavirus Is Biological Warfare Weapon, POSTED BY: GREATGAMEINDIA, FEBRUARY 4, 2020

"Conspiracy theories are spreading faster than the coronavirus itself."
The Wuhan Virus Is Not a Lab-Made Bioweapon, FP, BY JUSTIN LING | JANUARY 29, 2020

"The fact that China’s top virus research institute is located in Wuhan, the same city in which the coronavirus outbreak first appeared, raises questions which require answers.

Only a full disclosure of what has been going on at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where research has been carried out into the spread of the coronavirus from animals to humans, will satisfactorily resolve these concerns."
Coronavirus: China must answer hard questions, by Peter Westmore, News Weekly, February 8, 2020

"The world’s most trafficked mammal may be involved in the Wuhan outbreak, but the evidence is far from clear.
[...]
The virus was found in people associated with the market, and in the market environment — on surfaces, for instance, or in cages. However, some of the early cases, including what might have been the first reported case, were in people who were not associated with the market. Jon Epstein, vice president for science and outreach at EcoHealth Alliance in New York, said this means the first jump from animals to humans may not have occurred in the marketplace. People may have contracted the disease from animals at another location or earlier, as yet unknown cases may have contracted the disease at the market and passed it on to other people."
Pangolins Are Suspected as a Potential Coronavirus Host, NTY, By James Gorman, Feb. 10, 2020

“It’s very helpful to know what the genome looks like and what the proteins look like,” says Rachel Roper, a biologist at East Carolina University who was part of the team that first analyzed and sequenced the SARS coronavirus genome in 2003 and did not participate in this study. “It gives us some idea about what protein differences may be that are allowing this virus to be so virulent and transmissible in humans.”

"We’re all wondering where this virus came from, and we can see from the new sequence and the sequences that we’ve already had for coronaviruses that it’s likely to be a recombinant of a number of different coronaviruses that are known.
—Rachel Roper, East Carolina University"
Scientists Compare Novel Coronavirus with SARS and MERS Viruses,The Scientist.com ABBY OLENA, Feb 11, 2020

 Threatening enemies with the military, economic consequences of challenging the narrative of a 'normal', non-subterfuge, release of the bioweapon.


China denies Australian minister's request to talk about barley amid coronavirus investigation tension, MN, 19-5-2020

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus
✔ @DrTedros
 ·


Replying to @DrTedros
As I told media yesterday, spread outside appears to be slow now, but could accelerate. Containment remains our objective, but all countries must use the window of opportunity created by the containment strategy to prepare for the virus’s possible arrival.


Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus
✔ @DrTedros
There’ve been some concerning instances of onward spread from people with no travel history to 🇨🇳. The detection of a small number of cases may indicate more widespread transmission in other countries; in short, we may only be seeing the tip of the iceberg.

867

Peter Hartcher’s opinion piece in the Sydney Morning Herald provides a well-reasoned argument why we must for the preservation of a way of life which maximises the possibility of Australians citizens determining our own futures, rather than a Chinese Communist  rationale system subjecting us to their demented, self-serving worldview which determines we must accept without question the Chinese Communist right to unleash a pandemic on the world, then have to pay them for the means of protecting ourselves from it, and praise the Chinese Communist regime for their dangerous behaviour, and if we do not the Chinese communist regime will force us into poverty.

The money or our sovereignty: China leaves us no choice, Peter Hartcher Political and international editor for The Sydney Morning Herald, May 1, 2020

This is an insightful reflection, at its core is an understanding, not all Biology/Culture Ideologies rationale systems inform the same inherent risk to the security of Other Culture Ideologies. The reason being, although we may believe we are free-willed independent individuals, we all reside within specific Biology/Culture Ideology behavioural-belief-relationships defined variance whose political-social-economic goals-rationale systems, such as the Chinese Communist regime, can and do inform the endgame conversion, subjugation, elimination of Other.

Believing we are more alike in our human aspirations than different and therefore we can if we try hard enough, we can achieve universal mutual understanding and security in the face of an antithesis ethical-value culture ideology differences and political-social goals is dangerous delusion.

At the same time, we must discriminate between adherents of antithesis Biology/Culture Ideologies such as the Chinese Communist Regime and those with the same biology Chinese origin with a differing culture ideology worldview. In other words, boycotting Australian Chinese Restaurants and showing bias against Australian Chinese derived peoples without evidence of them reflecting a view supportive of the coercive ideological views of the Chinese Communist regime is unwarranted and counter to Democratic values.

China must be held to account for the pandemic, as they failed to stop it at its source, it has been clear for some time the Chinese have been actively investigating the utilisation of biological weapons against humanity, the wet markets the Chinese claim was the origin of the pandemic, have been identified as a major potential source of pandemics and they did not act to shut them down, apart from the silencing of Doctors raising the alarm, wasting precious times and lives determines the Chinese Communist regime criminally negligent, and therefore culpable for the deaths of thousands and potentially millions and Chinese Communist regime must be made to pay for their dangerous behaviour.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

“Open the Gates!” “Look it is an open-hearted, generous, reconciliation gesture.” “Simple” “Open the Gates!” Simple we are told. Simplicity mantra of a scam artist

Image
“Open the Gates!” “Look it is an open-hearted, generous, reconciliation gesture.” “Simple” “Open the Gates!” Simple we are told. Simplicity mantra of a scam artist. “Keep the Gates Closed!” “Look it is a dangerous scam necessitating being hidden behind the usual open-hearted, generous, reconciliation gesture facade” “Simple” “Keep the Gates Closed!”  VOTENO. When anyone says, ‘Simple just sign yes here, you do not have to worry about the fine print or future consequences that will sort out by themselves. This is just a simple change to your foundation document the constitution.’ Citizens are seriously advised to say No. For under every such simplicity resides a shark fest of complexity. To claim any change to our constitution is simplicity should immediately have the fire bells ringing. Being first over a geographical line, being resident in one place for a million years or a month and being subject as we all have to colonisation does not bestow inalienable rights to anything. Par
Read more

Do Not Agree to a Referendum it is based on a Lie. Do Not Create a First and Second Citizen, Nor Grant Indigenous Citizens Political Privilege No Other Citizen or Citizen Group Will Possess, For it Means the Destruction of Equal Voice to Power Democracy, Increasing Schism and Demand for More Power and Resources.

Image
"“I think it will get up, but I don’t think it means that much. I don’t believe it will change the lives of Aboriginals living in Yuendumu and outlying settlements. I don’t think their lives will change at all,” Mr Richardson told Sky News Political Editor Andrew Clennell" The cost of failure, costly new bureaucracy in wealth, schism and destruction of Equal Voice to Power Democracy. VOTE NO. When a beggar confronts you in the street hold out their hands blackmailing you with emotionalism  begging "Release me from my " despair and hopelessness.  Hand over your power and wealth". Telling you such a gracious and generous request on their part and your positive compliance will ameliorate your conscience and fill your "spiratual emptiness" a ccusing you of being totally responsible for the persons behavior which placed them in such a condition not their own negative behavior, requiring your repentance when the person begging is Stan Grant, Noel Pearson, L
Read more

#VoteNo saves Equal vote equal voice to power democracy. In fact, saves Democracy from being subverted by a minority.

Image
No citizen should have more rights to influence policy than any other citizen.  It becomes a tyranny of the few against the interests of the many which is an antitheists  to what a Democracy represents. Does the world care about what Australia thinks about them? No. So why would we care what the world thinks about us? Indeed the point is to create a politic that works for Australia, not for the world at large. As with the claims the Voice will solve anything there is no evidence to support the claim. As it is with the claim voting no will ruin our world reputation there is no evidence to support the claim. "[...] Cape York communities reel from gang-rape of a five-year-old boy in July and signs of a resurgence of youth sexual violence [...]  violence there forced closure of the local school and evacuation of teaching staff [...] He highlighted the importance of reducing sexual violence for the future of Aboriginal communities." 'Restore axed youth sex violence plan',
Read more