“A nation, like man, is the creature of its past." - China's precedent-breaking Xi Jinping gets set to bolster his power?
 |
| Tiananmen Square Hypocrisy: 'Modern' Socialism built upon a pile of 45 million Chinese citizens terrorised-murdered, all the ducks quacking in time, same amplitude and frequency |
“A nation, like man, is the creature
of its past."
THE REVOLUTIONARY IDEA IN FRANCE, 1789-1871,
By Lord Elton, 1923.
China's multi-billion dollar media campaign 'a major threat for democracies' around the world, ABC, By Sean Mantesso and Christina Zhou, 8-2-2019
Mao said on 27th February, 1957:
”What should our policy be toward non-Marxist ideas? So far as unmistakable counter-revolutionaries and wreckers of the socialist cause are concerned, the matter is easy; we simply deprive them of their freedom of speech.”
"Scholars and political leaders describe increasing concerns about Chinese government influence over teaching and research in the U.S. and Australia."
China’s ‘Long Arm’, INSIDE HIGHER ED, By Elizabeth Redden, January 3, 2018
“The Chinese in ancient times referred to themselves as the Hua, the “Flowery” – or “Splendid” people, a designation that even today constitutes part of the official name of China. They also spoke of their country as Chung–kuo, or the Middle Kingdom, picturing themselves as occupying a bright plateau of civilisation that sloped off sharply on all sides into barbarian darkness. In these dark outer regions lived various non-Chinese peoples, differing from the Chinese in language and habits and in many cases pursuing nomadic or hunting and gathering mode of life, in contrast to the overwhelming agricultural Chinese.
In an effort to open up new lands for cultivation, the Chinese were
continually pushing into the territories of these foreign tribes, spurring them
at times to armed resistance. Thus, as in the preceding Shang, The ruler and his
barons were frequently engaged in warfare with enemies abroad or with insurgents
within the realm.”
LAO-TZU,
Tao Te Ching, Hackett Publishing Company, 1993
“China’s rise is explained as much by
its long and deep historical and cultural experience as it is from deliberate actions
taken by those recent and current leaders most identified with its ascendance to
great power status. Sino-centrism has framed Chinese thinking for centuries. It
is embodied in the belief that China is a superior civilization with a legitimate
claim as the cultural center of the world. In Mandarin, China’s name literally translates
to “Middle Kingdom.” Thus, China’s renewed activist strategy to ascend to great
power is rooted in the idea of assuming its rightful place in world affairs.”
OUTPLAYED: REGAINING STRATEGIC INITIATIVE
IN THE GRAY ZONE, A Report Sponsored by the Army Capabilities
Integration Center in coordination with
Joint Staff J-39/Strategic Multi-Layer Assessment Branch, 2016
"Fish cannot
escape the deep pool." Tao Te Ching
China is rapidly implementing military
dominance over South China Sea making it impossible for the US to move freely to
protect its interests or in fact Australian interests. Once set up Taiwan is cactus
and we have lost control of our most important transit routes.
If
it is true the US and its allies are defenders of a rules based order then defend
it. A ruling has been made that China has broken the rules do not wait until it
is impossible to react in time and with the required force. Turf China out of the
South China Sea now. Make sure its drilling rigs and the accompanying bully Chinese
patrol boats attacking allies are forced back.
The strategy of patience has failed
because it is simply another word for appeasement. Force China to demilitarise the
fake islands and vacate them. The alternative is the war will come and the defence
in depth China is creating will be impossible to bridge without enormous cost –
if alas at all. Fight a war from a position of moral and military strength now or
simply wait to be defeated – I do not believe history has been lost on China to
the extent it has been forgotten by the West.
"I swear to God this sacred oath
that to the Leader of the German Empire and people, Adolf Hitler, supreme commander
of the armed forces, I shall render unconditional obedience and that as a brave
soldier I shall at all times be prepared to give my life for this oath."
The term 'Hitler oath' refers to the
oath of allegiance, or Reichswehreid, sworn by the officers and soldiers of the
German Armed Forces and civil servants of Nazi Germany between the years 1934 and
1945. The oath pledged personal loyalty to Adolf Hitler in place of loyalty to the
constitution of the country.
XI's Oath:
“The Chinese military will be absolutely
loyal, pure, reliable and resolutely follow the orders of Central Military Commission
(CMC) Chairman Xi Jinping,” China’s highest military authority has said."
Chinese
military pledges total loyalty to Xi, BEIJING, NOV 6, 2017
Oath of allegiance to a leader not the
culture one is defending leaves no room to question the veracity, wisdom of the
direction a leader will take and reflects a need for power and desire to manifest
that power which as history proves will definitely not be good for Other in the
first instance and inevitably brings war to the culture itself which may or may
not achieve the subjugation-elimination of Other that clearly such a cultural strategy
reflects. Either way Other will pay for not reacting immediately, negatively to such a promotion, congratulations
are no appropriate, in fact the reverse and preparing for the inevitable war with
such a culture are.
Do
not fear death: Strongman President Xi addresses entire China military,
CNBC, Justina Crabtree, 5-1-2017
China's precedent of creating Emperors
continues. The Chinese war of attrition 200-100-50-20-7-2-1 is upon us and unless
we understand the truth of our circumstance we to will be subsumed in Chinese dissimulating
Confucianism moral character of obedience to Emperor and Sun Tzu's deception, fire
and conquest.
Communist China is North Korea. Communist
China has been quite happy to create and nurture a regime on its flank which continually
subjugates its citizens to tyranny Communist China itself utilises as in Tiananmen
square, and reflected in Communist China's silencing of its own citizens, with bullying
States to align to its vision of the world whilst utilising dissimulating soft power
with its reformed 'peaceful' Confucian face.
One must remember the first time Confucius
was taken on board by a Chinese Emperor was in conjunction with China's greatest
military expansion, also Confucianism previously determined by Chinese Communists
as reactionary and supportive of the construct of Emperor against the interests
of the working/peasant class which Confucianism was utilised to enforce has for
the same reason been brought back to carry out the same function.
The Emperor points the masses unquestionably
follow.
The real threat is China along with
the alliances being developed between it Russia and the Islamic States.
We live in ‘modern’ times of course
it is ridiculous anyone would consider overthrowing the current 'modern' system
to once again inform the horror of war and extermination of Other. Trouble is if
we look back the Romans/Greeks believed exactly the same regards their own cultures
so obvious superiority.
“The lessons here are:
…..
(c) That peace cannot be brought by appeasement;
that it is far better in the long run to challenge at an early stage rather than
allow an aggressor to go on from strength to strength until the inevitable war begins
with the defender at a dangerous disadvantage.
…
If you make the deductions from your
intelligence reports fit your preconceived notions about what the enemy is or ought
to be doing, you are almost bound to be surprised.”
MIDDLE EAST 1939-43, DIRECTORATE OF
MILITARY TRAINING, Military Board Army Headquarters, Melbourne, 31/8/1959
Albeit for me to advise the Chinese
people they have suffered this road as well as Other before, but what is one cultures
suffering is another's normative existence towards which they will always gravitate
for it is survival as a social group which defines our individual behaviour for
we require more than one to exploit our environment including other humans individuals
and groups - the maximising of survival methods defence-attack-dissimulation to
create the next generation is a cultural act derived from specific historical-geographic-economic
context a seared genetic-social certainty resistant in fact almost immune unless
amputated to outside ethical-method virus.
The Marxist operation simply failed,
but worse Marx's unscrupulous method reinforced an already Chinese cultural ethic
the individual exists only for the advancement of the State, in the Chinese case
the advancement of the Emperor XI which is one and the same as the advancement of
the Chinese culture-people. If you thought humanity have experienced the worst that
one human can do to another alas soon this will be shown to be a false hope.
One has to wonder since we know we continue
on the same road 'Who is it we actually eat for?' Is there something driving us to continual
warfare between lulls of "a fantastic object-lesson in how people can
live together creatively and in harmony" apart from significant
ethic-value-belief method differences developing or existent within our own cultures
or between Other cultures to inform war against our own or Other?
“It (Damascus-Syria)
has seen empires and tyrants come and go; it offers a fantastic object-lesson in
how people can live together creatively and in harmony. It is a wonderful city in
which to be. …. a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively
and in harmony"
British Historian Dan Cruickshank BBC
series "Cruickshank's Adventures in Architecture, Episode 5 - Connections,
Syria, Damascus 2008, First aired on BBC Two in April 2008
Or do our human-cultural 'environment'
natures determine in the end we will "become all one thing or all the
other."
"A house divided against itself
cannot stand."
I believe this government cannot endure,
permanently half slave and half free.
I do not expect the Union to be dissolved
-- I do not expect the house to fall -- but I do expect it will cease to be divided.
It will become all one thing or all the
other."
“In any moment of decision, the best
thing you can do is the right thing, the next best thing is the wrong thing, and
the worst thing you can do is nothing.” Theodore Roosevelt
It should also be noted the threat from
China is significantly exacerbated by its gender imbalance-if one determines as
the ancient Greeks the human need for aspiring eternal life resides in the capacity
to recreate yourself in the next generation, supported by darwinian drives of the
individual framed by culture whose primary purpose is to recreate itself in the
next generation one has to make plans for the inevitable.
"..many South & East Asian countries
have significantly more men than women. For example, China is likely to have around
48 million more men than women by 2045. This could lead to social challenges, particularly
as male-dominated societies tend to be more authoritarian and more prone to violence."
Strategic Trends Programme, Global Strategic
Trends - Out to 2045, Ministry of Defence UK
Caprioli, M. and Trumbore, P. F. (2003),
‘Identifying ‘Rogue’ States and Testing their Interstate Conflict Behavior’, available
at http://lib.znate.ru/docs/index-124184.html
Comments
Post a Comment