“To make one exception means to make them all.” - Clothing such as the Muslim headscarf, hijab, burqa... is a political cultural statement and informs adherence and respect for the ideological constructs attached to it which hold tragic consequences for women.
 | ||
“To
make one exception means to make them all.” The same Islamic
Construct of Women informs both outcomes as it must - Own it. "“I’ve seen the Taliban, I’ve been speaking to the locals who have seen them kill people, beat people up for not wearing burqas or for wearing eyeliner or mascara,” Mr Routledge told The Spectator after he was safely evacuated to Dubai in 2021." Three British nationals including ‘danger tourist’ held by Taliban in Afghanistan, Independent, Eleanor Noyce, 2-4-2022 In any biology/culture ideology codex does it say a particular sexs sexuality-reproductive function has to be controlled to create as many new adherents as possible as an imperative and as a drive to do so requires the satiation of the sexual innate desires-drive of one particular sex which would also tend to attract-retain more non-adherants of that sex for conversion due to the increased relative access to sexual intercourse of multiple partners relative to Other biology/culture ideologies? No. It frames such an inequity in the language of moderation a catch phrase for stability, good character, "modesty” promising derived safety from implicit explicit even violent sexual attention. “modesty” = security of body. Constructing a particular sex as a purely sexual body by forcing a sex to neut-subjugate their own inherent sexuality, such rationale enables genital mutilation as the ultimate desexification of the body itself, by deemphasizing the sexual form under canvas, by repressing any sexual drive behaviours of attracting a desirable mate, to become an object trained in operant conditioned-social observation obedience to acquiesce to the opposite sex demand for sexual intercourse allowed within a marriage where multiple wives a further deemphasise the sex as individual a body of many bodies. Multiple sexual partners accentuating further the attraction of the culture ideology increased access to sex for the opposite sex increasing competition by adherents themselves. Lack of sexual partners in culture ideology increasing aggression and drive to seek non culture ideology sex-sexual partners and potential converts or mere objects of sexual satisfaction behavior justified as the objects deviate from prescribed modesty and are thus immodest fair game. "The news comes weeks after Iran’s hardline president, Ebrahim Raisi, ordered a crackdown on women’s rights and called for stricter enforcement of the country’s mandatory dress code, which has required all women to wear the hijab head-covering since the 1979 Islamic revolution. Amini’s family were notified that she had been taken to hospital hours after her arrest. She was transferred to an intensive-care unit at Kasra hospital. According to Hrana, an Iranian human rights organisation, Amini’s family were told during her arrest that she would be released after a “re-education session”." Iranian woman dies ‘after being beaten by morality police’ over hijab law. The Guardian, Weronika Strzyżyńska, 17-9-2022 When the codex reveals its true nature in the enforcement with equivalent aggression to maintain such inequity which would not exist without the methodology of engendering fear, a state starkly differing-contradiction of the benefits of such a state existing in surrounding significant Other biology/culture ideologies scripts/roles/constructs of the controlled sex threatening potential defection which have the controlled sex seeking change to their condition one, two a few apologists among the many definers of the right way for such a culture ideology emerge to ameliorate the inevitable negative response internal/external to claim such enforcement actions to not reflect the true nature of the system failing to cognitively conjecture the enforcement of such a state necessarily requires such aggressive response to make sure the codex derived scripts/roles/behaviours persist. "The East Asia and the Pacific region had the lowest prevalence of perinatal depression at 21.4% (95% CI, 19.8%-23.1%) and was significantly increased in the Middle East and North Africa at 31.5% (95% CI, 26.9%-36.2%; between-group comparison: P < .001). In subgroup analyses, the highest prevalence of perinatal depression was found among women who experienced intimate partner violence, at 38.9% (95% CI, 34.1%-43.6%)." March 8, 2023, Prevalence of Perinatal Depression in Low- and Middle-Income Countries, A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Alexandra Roddy Mitchell, MPH1,2; Hannah Gordon, MD1,2; Anthea Lindquist, DPhil Of course the codex does not stipulate such methods of enforcement are required to maintain the system it is necessarily inferred due to the stark inequality/inequity of the power of the controlled sex for who in their right mind adhere to a codex which was honest as to the ramifications of such a construct one therefore blames the operators of the system or the victim. "Two of Iran’s senior ayatollahs have said the country’s feared morality police are illegal and un-Islamic as violent protests broke out against the supreme leader over the death of a woman beaten for not wearing her hijab properly. ..." Senior ayatollahs say Iran’s morality police are ‘illegal and un-Islamic’, The Telegraph, ByAhmed Vahdat, 17 September 2022 We see in demonstrations of dissent yes some "Women take headscarves off in protest at funeral" yet we also see the women enforces via social observation refusing to do so at the funeral and subsequent demonstartions, the conditioning that this is the norm and to do otherwise is immodest, the fear of retribution even within a supportive mass of adherents of differring sex cannot break the codex script. Defect or change nothing the inevatable moral police, everywhere in the streets in homes will reappear. Mahsa Amini: Women take headscarves off in protest at funeral, By Ali Hamedani, 18-9-2022, BBC World Service
Photographs and film of the petite young officer wearing a hijab on the front line went viral last year, with senior colleagues calling her inspirational. Although she was unnamed at the time, The Mail on Sunday can reveal the police constable is 26-year-old Ruby Begum, who in the months before joining the Metropolitan Police in 2016 used Twitter to insult Jews and mock the 9/11 attacks." Exposed: Muslim policewoman who was hailed as a hero for confronting anti-lockdown protesters posted a torrent of racist messages and had regular contact with a suspected female jihadi in Syria, By IAN GALLAGHER and ABUL TAHER FOR THE MAIL ON SUNDAY, PUBLISHED: 07:00 AEDT, 8 August 2021"With formal schooling on sexuality minimal to nonexistent in much of the Middle East, and a patriarchal culture that has left many Arab women ignorant and ashamed of their own bodies, Ms. Emam and a growing number of activists have built online platforms to try to fill the gap." Sex Ed, One Instagram Post at a Time, The New York Times, By Mona El-Naggar and Sara Aridi, Nov. 18, 2021 "The deputy head of the Taliban cultural commission: “Islam does not allow women to play sports where they are exposed. We fought, so that Islam is respected" The deputy head of the Taliban cultural commission: “Islam does not allow women to play sports where they are exposed. We fought, so that Islam is respected. ", Agence France-Presse, Jeanne, 09/09/2021 "The Taliban have so far asked only female health workers to return to work. Zabihullah Mujahid, the Taliban’s top spokesman, said the decision not to allow other women to start working is “temporary.” He promised that all women would be able to return to their offices once the Taliban trains its fighters to respect women." ‘Don’t be afraid,’ women chant on Afghanistan’s streets in protest against the Taliban., NYT, Sharif Hassan, Sept. 7, 2021 The nature of womens place in a biology/culture ideology are set long before someone with a Kalashnikov aged 7 and above utilisies the instruction-training already imbued by their parents, family, communities and institutions 0-7. "Women: “If the Taliban take over, I lose my identity,” Wahida Sadeqi, 17, said. The group will likely strip women of their rights and crack down on education for girls. On Sunday, in Kabul’s city center, people painted over posters of women at beauty salons, apparently preparing for a fundamentalist takeover." Afghanistan falls to the Taliban, NYT, 16-8-2021 "“If the #Taliban take over, I lose my identity,” Wahida Sadeqi, 17, said."  "The action against Zainab Abdirahman-Khalif comes after she served the remainder of a three-year jail term following a decision by the High Court to overturn her appeal court acquittal on taking steps to be a member of terror group Islamic State." Control order issues in SA terror case, Microsoft news, Tim Dornin 19/08/2021 Other should not pay in scarce resources & precious lives so Muslim women & men do not lose a Western derived "identity". Muslim women & men are responsible for what walks from their Islamic codex floors - fix it. Muslim women and men change their culture-ideology or whatever relative independence they gain under a Western derived protection and definition of freedom will be swept away as the Islamic-Muslim true believer status is once again enforced by their very own altruist creations with the method of extreme fear authorized by their very own Quran codex. Change the codex of change nothing.
"Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid, while addressing a news conference in Kabul in his first public appearance, said women “will be given all their rights within Sharia “the Islamic laws.” Mujahid also said if women work in line with Sharia they can work freely in media. Speaking to VOA earlier, Suhail Shaheen declined to clearly state whether Afghan women will be part of the future government. “About women, we have announced already that they can have access to work and education by observing hijab. Today, you may have seen on (Afghan) TV stations women wearing hijab and doing their job,” he said." Taliban Vow to Respect Women's Rights 'Within Islamic Law'. VOA, By Ayaz Gul, Ayesha Tanzeem, August 17, 2021 Taliban kill woman for not wearing burqa on same day it vows to honour ‘women’s rights’, Jesse O’Neill, news.com.au, AUGUST 19, 2021 Taliban says will respect women’s rights, press freedom, Al-Jazeera, 17 Aug 2021 "A number of verses in the Koran say that men and women “were created from the same essence.” Some also state that men are “qawwamun” in relation to women. The meaning of this term is hotly debated. It has been interpreted to mean “protectors and maintainers” but also understood by some to connote the superiority of men over women. The verse goes on to say that devout women are “obedient” and that if they persistently disobey, their male protectors, as a last resort, should “strike” or “beat” them. Sharia established that women have legal and financial rights, as well as the right to inherit. However, the Koran specifies that a sister inherits half of her brother’s amount. Some scholars have argued that the difference in inheritance is balanced by the fact that men have the responsibility for financially supporting the women, elderly and young in the family. It’s often said that under sharia, a woman’s testimony is worth half that of a man’s. This is based on a Koranic verse that says: “And if there are not two men [available], then [bring] a man and two women from those whom you accept as witnesses.” The passage is about the necessity of having witnesses to a business contract where one of the parties is “of limited understanding.” Some scholars argue that at the time the verse was written, it was rare for women to have business experience and that its purpose was not to impugn women’s credibility generally. The Koran states that a woman should not reveal her beauty to men beyond her family. Many Islamic jurists have ruled that this requires women to cover their hair and others their face. 3. How does sharia get reflected in national laws? Sharia is cited as either “a source” or “the source” of legislation in many constitutions across the Muslim world. Women are most affected by the provisions concerning family or personal status. That means they often don’t have the same rights as men when it comes to matters such as marriage, divorce and inheritance. The disparity between women’s rights in relatively liberal Iraq versus conservative Iran reflects the latitude that political leaders take in interpreting what it means to base law on sharia. Iraq’s 2005 constitution is among those that guarantee equality between the sexes. Meanwhile, in Iran, women have limited freedom of movement and face edicts on what they can wear, as they did in Afghanistan when the Taliban were previously in power from 1996 to 2001. In Saudi Arabia, where the Muslim holy city of Mecca is, sharia was interpreted until recently to limit women’s travel and employment and their right to drive a vehicle." What Sharia Law for Afghan Women Under the Taliban Might Mean, Bloomberg Equality, By Lisa Beyer, 18 August 2021, "Muslim girls end up religiously segregated mainly because they tend to self-segregate and not because non-Muslims are reluctant to be friends with them. In contrast, non-Muslims’ reluctance to be friends with Muslims and Muslim in-group bias equally strongly contribute to friendship segregation of Muslim boys. In combination, our results thus demonstrate that the emergence of religious segregation in adolescents’ friendship networks follows from an interplay of religion and gender." In-Group Bias or Out-Group Reluctance? The Interplay of Gender and Religion in Creating Religious Friendship Segregation among Muslim Youth, David Kretschmer, Lars Leszczensky Author Notes Social Forces, soab029, https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soab029, Published: 14 April 2021 Erdogan promises stronger freedoms, human rights in Turkey, ALJAZEERA, 2 Mar 2021 "Turkey late Friday pulled out of the treaty by presidential decree, in the latest victory for conservatives in President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's ruling party and his nationalist party allies. Turkish conservatives had claimed the charter damages family unity, encourages divorce and that its references to equality were being used by the LGBT community to gain broader acceptance in society." 'Huge setback': Fury as Turkey withdraws from international treaty preventing violence against women, SBS, 21-3-2021"In Australia, an estimated 53,000 women have undergone FGM, with Ms Gbla predicting 11 girls a day are at risk. FGM is illegal in all Australian states and territories and can carry with it 14 years imprisonment. Ms Gbla said there is “hesitancy” in Australia to address and educate residents about FGM, highlighting that bringing the conversation into the classrooms could be a good place to start. “People are worried on one end that they’ll be racist and on the other hand assuming it’s our culture,” she said." Female Genital Mutilation: Underground practice 'alive' in Aus, SBS, 15-12-2020, Iranian women's ski coach barred from going to world championships by husband | Iran | The Guardian, 19-2-2021 Democracy has to be so much more than a mark on a piece of paper for Democracy to continue to survive against the force of the tyranny of one thought, complete certainty and the inevitable blasphemy paradigm to have the 'good' the 'moderate' continue to create evil claiming innocents regards what they systemically deliver into humanities streets. "Two days ago I had to flee my home and life in the north of Afghanistan after the Taliban took my city. I am still on the run and there is no safe place for me to go." ‘Please pray for me’: female reporter being hunted by the Taliban tells her story. Guardian Australia, 12-8-2021 Praying to the same God which created the Afghan-Taliban does not appear to be a rational response. The notion some in the Australian military and others utilised to justify their presence as every other claim fell bloody beside them that they were saving Afghan women failed to understand a significant number of Muslim women enough to keep those seeking to throw off their culture ideology in their culture ideological political space were ever present. Trying to alter one facet of a non-contradictory rational system and leaving the rest intact to return with a vengeance to enforce culture ideology scripts and rules is arrogance personified. Machiavelli told us change the whole culture ideology to your own or expect defeat - so what happens? The lies Muslim women in the face of absolute infamy assure each other, even as they suffer tragically from their delusion:`
“Excuse
me, Islam to me is the most feminist religion, right. We got equal rights well before
the Europeans.” Ms Abdel-Magied and added ““In Sharia it says you follow the law
of the land on which you are on.” Clearly relative Freedom for women in Islam is another's Tyranny. “The status of women as a free and dignified human being has been restored and all institutions have been obliged to help women in securing marriage, inheritance and other rights.” Taliban supreme leader: Steps toward ‘betterment of women’ taken in Afghanistan | The Hill, BY JULIA MUELLER - 06/25/23 3:11 PM ET "Gaza City: A Hamas-run Islamic court in the Gaza Strip has ruled that women require the permission of a male guardian to travel, further restricting movement in and out of the territory that has been blockaded by Israel and Egypt since the militant group seized power" Gaza women now need guardian’s approval to travel, SMH, Fares Akram February 16, 2021 In fact is this European Tuscan women clearly had much more equity than Muslim women ever have or will as a culture ideology whole, long before Mohammad walked out of a cave hearing voices. Even if the claim “Excuse me, Islam to me is the most feminist religion, right. We got equal rights well before the Europeans.” above were the case which it is not, the concern is Islam-Muslim moral rational system seeks to have its notions of right behavior recognised as well as the paradigms for deviant behavior, ie blasphemy. Executing journalist either via State legislation, or in the streets is a common occurrence compared to Western Democracies, and this is the point of relativity in determining a group's threat, based upon what the moral rational system informs, and therefore will inform in future, rather than what we would like it to be or are assured it really is despite a history of contradiction-anomalies. "One of Iran’s most famous political prisoners, Nasrin Sotoudeh, has been on hunger strike for more than 40 days, and recently spent some time in hospital due to her weakening condition. She is a lawyer and has defended the right of women not to wear the hijab." UK, France and Germany summon Iranian ambassadors over prisoners, Patrick Wintour Diplomatic editor, 24 Sep 2020
"The two women were killed and their driver was injured in an attack at about 8:30am, police said, adding the case was being investigated by security forces. Supreme Court of Afghanistan spokesman Ahmad Fahim Qawim said the women were judges who worked for the court but he did not identify them by name." Afghan Supreme Court judges gunned down in Kabul, ABC, 18-1-2021 "The fugitive widow of an Islamic State gunman and a man described as his logistician have been convicted of terrorism charges and sentenced to 30 years in prison in the trial of 14 people linked to the January 2015 attacks in Paris against the satirical Charlie Hebdo newspaper and a kosher supermarket." Fugitive widow one of 14 convicted in Charlie Hebdo, kosher market attacks, SMH, By Lori Hinnant, December 17, 2020 "Angry Pakistanis are demanding justice for a five-year-old girl who was reportedly kidnapped, raped and set ablaze in the city of Karachi." The latest rape and death of a child in Pakistan has prompted a surge of anger on social media.SBS, 8-9-2020, BY EVAN YOUNG "Ms Kay is the founder of Faithless Hijabi, an organisation which supports women who have been abused for leaving Islam and, while she was born in Tanzania, she is also an Australian citizen. [...] "We've been campaigning … to authorities to drop these trumped up charges," she said. "We do believe strongly that someone from the community that she's from, which is a Muslim community, because Zara is so vocal in her activism, we believe that initially it was a report done by a member of that community. "It's hard to get hard evidence of who, but we already know why." Australian Zara Kay, campaigner for ex-Muslim women, left 'traumatised' by arrest in Tanzania over social media post, ABC, By political reporter Georgia Hitch, 4-1-2021 fREE TO CHOOSE. “..the paradigms tells us what is real and how it works, to question the paradigm is to question the structure of the world itself, according to those within the paradigm that leads to nonsense, to think about the paradigm rather than through the paradigm is not to engage in science but philosophy. Occasionally, however, anomalies pop-up....." Iranian musician Mehdi Rajabian arrested for working with women, By Mark Savage, BBC music reporter, 26 August 2020
Father accused of killing his daughter and her husband before turning the gun on himself is charged with murder after making a stunning recovery, Daily Mail, By WAYNE FLOWER IN MELBOURNE FOR DAILY MAIL AUSTRALIA, 9 January 2020, 14 May 2020 'Where are the women?' Outcry over all-male government meeting in Afghanistan, The Guardian, Stefanie Glinski in Kabul, 22 May 2020 "Amina was one of the youngest survivors of an attack on an Afghan hospital. Twenty-four people, including 16 mothers, were killed when gunmen opened fire on a maternity ward in Kabul last week. Amina's mother died in the attack. Her father spoke to the BBC of his loss and his daughter's survival. WARNING: This report shows the aftermath of the attack and contains upsetting footage." Afghan maternity ward attack: The newborn baby who survived two gunshots, BBC, 20 May 2020 "It has been five years since IS militants left their bases in Syria and Iraq and stormed into Sinjar in northern Iraq to begin a campaign of unimaginable horror. But Ana can still hear the sounds of girls crying as they were taken away by their captors from the Mosul house. "They would just grab her by the hair and drag her behind them. They would take off their shoes and whatever they could get their hands on and hit her to force her to go," she said." Australian terrorist Khaled Sharrouf bought her at a slave market. Now she wants justice, ABC, By Europe correspondent Bridget Brennan and Jessicah Mendes, 17 AugAugust 2019 "Two teenage girls have been murdered in north-west Pakistan in a so-called honour killing after a video of them circulated on the internet. They are said to have been shot dead by family members earlier this week. Police say the killing occurred after a short video of the girls with a young man emerged on social media. Human Rights Watch said violence against women and girls remained a serious problem in Pakistan, where about 1,000 women died every year in so-called honour killings. Two men, the father of one of the girls and the brother of the other, have been arrested in North Waziristan, according to Pakistan's Dawn newspaper. An earlier First Information Report filed by the Razmak police station had said the girls, aged 16 and 18, were "killed in the name of honour by their paternal cousin". "Mueller was kidnapped by ISIS fighters outside of a hospital in the Syrian town of Aleppo on Aug. 4, 2013 and held hostage for 18 months, during which she was raped repeatedly by al-Baghdadi himself before she was was reportedly killed during coalition airstrikes in February 2015."
The Pentagon named its mission to kill ISIS leader Abu Bakr
al-Baghdadi for one of his American victims, Jared Keller, October 27,
2019
Call
for reform after ‘blue girl’ facing jail sentence for trying to enter ground set
herself on fire"
"The horrific incident saw Nusrat Jahan Rafi doused in kerosene and set on fire after refusing to withdraw a sexual harassment complaint against the head teacher of the seminary she attended."
...
Activists
said the murder exposed a culture of impunity surrounding sex crimes against women
and children, and the fact those who reported harassment often suffered a backlash
...
Prosecutions
are also rare in cases of rape and sexual assault."
Bangladesh court sentences 16 to death for burning teenage
girl alive after she alleged sexual harassment, ABC, 24-10-2019
The law exists to punish yet is ignored why? Sharia Law enables what to occur within and outside space where its jurisdiction is the 'law of the land'? "Islam to me is the most feminist religion, right" - so wrong as to be insanity to believe it is so. "Some have rallied around a 29-year-old woman who set herself on fire outside a court in Tehran in protest at a prison sentence she had received for trying to enter a football stadium disguised as a man."
Thousands of Iranians support call for Iran world sport ban,
By Tom GerkenBBC News, 06 September 2019
It’s Hard To Be A Girl In Afghanistan. For The Jogi Minority, It’s Even Tougher,October 24, 2019 14:06 GMT, By RFE/RL's Radio Free Afghanistan "Forced into sex slavery
Few
people have dared to come back to the town and even fewer are willing to tell their
story.
Sharihan and her family belong to the Yazidi community that lives in the region of Sinjar. They are about half a million people. Another 200,000 are spread throughout Syria, Turkey and Iran. Who are the Yazidis? Who are the followers of a mysterious ancient faith surrounded by Islamic militants who threatened to kill them all?
This
religious minority prays to Melek Taus, an angel represented by a peacock, that
is the executor of divine will; the divinity is at such a high level that it can't
be directly worshipped. Islamic State (IS) radicals consider them to be satanic
worshippers, and their soldiers have the cruellest punishment for this minority.
The fate of captured men was death; many women, mainly teenagers like Sharihan, were forced to be sex slaves for the jihadists. It is thought that between 6,000 and 7,000 Yazidis were kidnapped by IS in the offensive. During their captivity, the women were raped, abused and auctioned as if they were cattle. "There, we were forced to take off our headscarves and then we had to walk in front of some men. I was 15. Until that moment, I had never thought that human beings could be sold," she says. "I don't remember how many men I have belonged to, but at least to 15 people in these three-and-a-half years."
Wounds opened by Islamic State are still healing in Sinjar,
five years after their terror began, ABC, By JM Lopez,11-8-2019
"Iran has introduced 2,000 new morality police units in reaction to what officials call an “increasing defiance” of the compulsory wearing of hijabs. The units, called “resistance groups for verbal and practical response to bad-hijabi women”, were launched recently in the northern province of Gilan as part of a pilot scheme."
Iran introduces 2,000 new morality police units in response
to women's hijab protests, The
Telegraph, Ahmed Vahdat, 7 JUNE 2019
"Iranian women are continuing to share videos of themselves taking off their headscarves in public, despite authorities threatening ten years in jail for doing so."
Iranian
women are continuing to share videos of themselves taking off their headscarves
in public, despite authorities threatening ten years in jail for doing so., SBS,
1-8-2019
"PEW-TEMPLTON Global Religion Futures Project in 2010 94.9% of Egyptians are Sunni Muslim, 5.1% are Christian, and less than 1% are Jewish, Buddhist, or other religions." “In a UN survey in 2013, 99% of Egyptian women reported that they had experienced some form of sexual harassment. Cairo was described as the “most dangerous megacity in the world for women” in a 2017 Thomson Reuters Foundationpoll.” “An Egyptian film star has been charged with public obscenity after she attended the Cairo Film Festival wearing a sheer dress that revealed her legs, according to state media.”
Egyptian actress Rania Youssef charged after wearing sheer
dress that revealed her legs, ABC, 3/12/2018
Indonesian policewomen measured through 'purity and beauty',
subjected to virginity testing, ABC, By Tasha Wibawa, 20-10-2018
“Hundreds of women have tried to escape Saudi Arabia in recent years, fleeing the strict male guardianship laws that control every aspect of their lives. Four Corners follows the stories of some of the women who attempt the desperate dash for freedom.” The women who make it and the ones who don’t, ABC, By Sophie McNeill, Brigid Andersen and Georgina Piper, 4 Feb 2019 “Excuse me, Islam to me is the most feminist religion, right."? Muslim women do the facts bare comparison? "Excuse me, Islam to me is the most feminist religion, right. We got equal rights well before the Europeans." compared to Cairo 2013 "94.9% of Egyptians are Sunni Muslim" the “most dangerous megacity in the world for women” in a 2017". "Cairo was ranked as the most dangerous megacity for women from a U.N. list of 19 cities. The Egyptian capital, with an estimated population in 2016 of 19 million, fared worst when it came to harmful cultural practices for women such as female genital mutilation and forced marriage and was named the third worst city when respondents were asked if women were at risk of sexual harassment and violence." "Sajid Javid has ordered an investigation into why members of sexual grooming gangs are disproportionately from a Pakistani background. …. It comes after Labour MP for Rotherham, Sarah Champion, was criticised last year for claiming the UK “has a problem with British Pakistani men raping and exploiting white girls”.” Home Secretary orders investigation into ethnic origin of sexual grooming gangs, Independent, Joe Watts Political Editor, 26-7-2018
Why? When there are significant systemic numbers of a particular Culture
Ideology complex system informing evil in the space relative Other in the same space
this emergent behavior are not deviance outliers to be found across all cultures,
this evil is created by the Culture Ideologies many categorisation development codex
process imbuing the adherents with the motivation, justification and authorisation
to commit tyranny.
“..pundits are quick to blame Islam itself, instead of noticing the army of Muslim women who are fighting for their rights within the faith, and defending women – and themselves – at all costs.”
A Sudanese teenager killed her rapist, and Muslim women
are fighting for her life, Yassmin Abdel-Magied, The Guardian, 11-5-2018
As usual YassminAbdel-Magied’s logic again gives truth to the “pundits” “quick to blame Islam itself” because the “faith”, morals-ethics-values-beliefs-motivation social/political method are fought against “within” the Islamic (faith) categorisation of women which equals “the difference in how this violence is discussed is stark, depending on where (Muslim dominated or otherwise space) and by whom (Muslims) it has been perpetrated.”. The "faith" (Islam) within which Muslim women exist and also Muslim women can be shown to enforce themselves, otherwise such behaviour would cease to exist, creates the behavioural relationship rules which determines “A Sudanese teenager killed her rapist, and Muslim women are fighting for her life”. Iran Won’t Outlaw Marriage of Under-13 Girls, as Islamic Countries Fare Worst in Annual Gender Survey, By Patrick Goodenough, CNSNEWS.com, December 25, 2018
Yassmin Abdel-Magied resides in an Other dominated space where although Muslim
behavioural variance is suppressed it still exists to inform the same outcome of
subjugation of women in Australian space. What will happen regards the position
of women when the Islamic/Muslim social/political power increases what is happening?
Change the Architect and Builder or change nothing. Yassmin Abdel-Magied fails to mention how the non-Muslim women subject
to Muslim-Islam categorisation leading to enslavement and denigration by Muslims
are to fight for justice - "within the faith" which justified and authorised
their continuing enslavement and rape since the seventh century?
““This is a practice from many centuries ago and at this stage in Malaysia’s growth and development, child marriage is not acceptable,” said Charles Santiago, a lawmaker with the governing coalition. But ever since outrage over Ayu’s case erupted on social media in Malaysia — after Mr. Che Abdul Karim’s second wife posted pictures on Facebook of the marriage ceremony with a sarcastic “happy wedding” message to him — critics say the new government, under the guise of religious freedom, has done too little to protect minors.” 11 and Married: Malaysia Spars Over Child Brides, NYT, By Hannah Beech, July 29, 2018 If a behaviour occurs in the present it is of the present not only centuries ago it has been occurring for centuries since Mohamad’s own actions in obtaining underage girls as he did from a community he had slaughtered. This behaviour including the slaughter of Other by Muslims has occurred right in front of us in the Middle East on a scale which cannot be excused as an outlier belief behaviour. Humanity either gets rid of the Islam/Muslim codex development process which will always contain such behaviour justification and authorisation or the practice will continue in the present that is humanities choice otherwise the false platitude of “This is a practice from many centuries ago” continues along with the inevitable infamy. Woman branded "a hero" for removing hijab during anti-government protests in Iran, The Mirror, Suz Elvey, 30 DEC 2017 "In the past 24 hours, the photos have gone viral. Young women standing tall and proud on the streets of Iran with their hair uncovered, defiantly waving their discarded headscarves on the end of sticks and in direct violation of the country's strict laws that force women to cover their hair. "They are risking their liberty, they are also exposing themselves to torture and other ill treatment at the hands of police and other paramilitary forces in Iran that enforce compulsory veiling against women," Raha Bahraini, Amnesty international's researcher on Iran, who has been closely following the spread of the powerful protest images, said" Iranian women remove their veils in defiant viral protest, ABC, Sophie McNeill, 31/1/2018 So importing more Iranians with the Muslim biology/culture ideology as the German socialist Minister (Katarina Barley) wants to do will reduce attacks on women? So importing more Afghans with the same Muslim biology/culture ideology having women kicked to death as infidels in the Afghan streets as the German socialist Minister (Katarina Barley) wants to do will reduce attacks on women? If a Muslim biology/culture ideology informs behavior in one space how is it the exact same Muslim biology/culture ideology will not inform it in another even though they already are? German socialist Minister (Katarina Barley) says migrant sex attacks can be prevented by importing more migrants, By VOICE OF EUROPE, 20 January 2018 Logic of German socialist Minister is More of the same Biology/Culture Ideology = less violence oppression against women. Reality Truth Check-Does the regression-correlation on the relationship between human security variables (Human Security Variables minimalist definition and most expansive definition) and the nature of women's condition-relative independence as the proportion of Muslim Biology/Culture Ideology rise or fall in any space. What is the significance of this data telling you relative to almost every Other Biology/Culture Ideology? Have a look at the actual data where more of the same Muslim Biology/Culture Ideology exist what is the data telling us will happen if more of the same arrive in your space? “A politically incorrect point must be noted here. Of the countries where women are held back and subjected to systematic abuses such as honor killings and genital cutting, a very large proportion are predominantly Muslim. Most Muslims worldwide don’t believe in such practices, and some Christians do – but the fact remains that the countries where girls are cut, killed for honor, or kept out of school or the workplace typically have large Muslim populations. To look at one broad gauge of well-being, of 130 countries rated in 2008 by the World Economic Forum according to the status of women, 8 of the bottom 10 were majority Muslim. Yemen was in last place, with Chad. Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan right behind it. No Muslim country ranks in the top 40. Kazakhstan ranks highest, at number 45, followed by Uzbekistan, at 55.” (Kristof & WuDunn 2010, pp. 162-3) The Global Gender Gap Report 2016 is published by the World Economic Forum Source: Table 3: Global rankings, 2016 – 9 of Bottom 10 were majority Muslim Countries, Yemen was in last place, with Chad. Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan right behind it, with Côte d'Ivoire 39% Muslims being the largest religious group. No majority Muslim country Ranked in the top 50, Kazakhstan 70.4% Muslim ranked 51 landed in the 157th spot (out of 180) in RSF’s 2017 World Press Freedom index. China came in at 176th. |
"I decided not to go to Saudi Arabia.
Not to play by someone's rules, not to wear abaya, not to be accompanied getting
outside, and altogether not to feel myself a secondary creature."
-
Two-times world chess champion Anna Muzychuk, DW, 7-1-2017
“Sajid Javid has suggested there could be “cultural
reasons” men from a Pakistani background become involved in grooming gangs.
The home secretary said it was “self-evident” there are a
high proportion of men of Pakistani heritage involved in recent cases and that
it would be wrong to dismiss the possibility just to be sensitive.
Sajid Javid suggests there could be ‘cultural reasons’ for Pakistani grooming gangs, Joe Watts Political Editor, Independent, 27-12-2018
Those who wish,
demand Muslim women and therefore all women's potential to come under or remain
under Man's authority and abuse, including the possibility of being denoted in the
name of any cause determine those opposed to the Muslim construct of women is a
obsession with Muslims women's bodies rather than the Muslim paradigm affect causing
the Muslim effect. Is Anna Muzychuk two-times world chess champion obsessed with
Muslims bodies of the effect of the Islam-Muslim culture-ideology effect on women's
minds and bodies?
"Newspapers quoted neighbours, friends
and acquaintances who remembered Aït Boulahcen as a vivacious, if somewhat vulnerable,
young woman, often seen in jeans and a cowgirl hat or cap before her decision to
begin wearing various forms of hijab in recent months. It was later reported that
Aït Boulahcen did not in fact detonate her own vest, indeed she may not have been
wearing a suicide vest at all, but that the force of a blast, detonated by a male
suicide bomber, scattered her body into the street. Widely circulating accounts
of her spine, her head, or other parts of her body landing on the police car outside
were corrected later still by reports asserting that her corpse had in fact been
delivered intact to a local hospital. Unlike the initial reports, the corrections
have been released quietly and have been far from front page news. At every stage,
her body and its fate have been central to representations of her, and of the siege
of Saint-Denis."
Your
fascination with Muslim women’s bodies has a long misogynistic history,
Media Diversified, by Nadia Atia, 17-12-2015
The argument contained in this document seeks to
expose the reality of the Muslim women's construct not what we would hope it represents
what it is in all its horror.
"fixation on the body of Muslim
woman"? Such a view is intellectual drivel determining the reverse of reality
reality. The fixation is not on the body of Muslim women but the physical and psychological
violence to which Muslim holistic woman's bodies are inevitably subject i.e. "Hasna
Aït Boulahcen, aged 26, of Moroccan origin, was killed in an explosion in Paris."
Does it matter that in the end if Hasna Aït Boulahcen was an innocent
bystander as claimed or integral to a suicide bombing of Other in both cases the
result is the same, bodies subject to Muslim construct of bodies inclusive of women
and Other. To excuse a cultures systemic terror-genocide and subjugation of women
to a specific Mans cultural defined authority and punitive justice is indicative
of severe mortality shifting of the worst kind for it leaves us subject to more
of the same.
“To make one exception means
to make them all.” Blaming
the Victim: Charlie Hebdo and Free Speech By Nicole Gelinas, January 18,
2015 New York Post
SURAH 4 AN-NISA
THE WOMEN
15
If any of you are guilty of lewdness, take the evidence of poor (reliable) witnesses
from amongst you against them; and if they testify, confine them to houses until
death to claim them, or Allah or ordain for them some (other) way.
Quran Surah 33 AL-AHZAB The Confederates
31
And stay quietly in your houses, and make not a dazzling display, like that of former
Times of Ignorance; and establish regular Prayer, and give regular Charity; and
obey Allah and His Messenger. And Allah only wishes to remove all abomination from
you, ye Members of the Family, and to make you pure and spotless.
...
36
It is not fitting for a Believer, man or woman, when the matter has been decided
by Allah and His Messenger, to have any option about their decision: if anyone disobeys
Allah and his Messenger, he is indeed on a clearly wrong path.
....
59
O Prophet! Although wives and daughters, and the believing women, that they should
cast their outer garments over their persons (when abroad): that is most convenient,
that they should be known (as such) and not molested. And Allah is Oft-Forgiving,
Most Merciful.
She said: 'From the moment I sat down
he was making these remarks: "You dress like this during Ramadan? You should
feel ashamed to be dressed like that"."No body helped her."
Shocking moment a woman is attacked by a man
on a Turkish bus 'because she was wearing mini shorts during Ramadan', By Iain Burns For Mailonline
and Afp, 22 June 2017, Follow
the Hahstag | How one woman's outcry spread across Turkey, DW
Results: Findings reveal differences
between women in polygamous and monogamous marriages.Women in polygamous marriages showed significantly higher psychological distress, and higher levels of somatisation, phobia and
other psychological problems. They also had significantly more problems in family functioning, marital relationships and life satisfaction."
A COMPARISON OF FAMILY FUNCTIONING, LIFE AND MARITAL SATISFACTION, AND MENTAL
HEALTH OF WOMEN IN POLYGAMOUS AND MONOGAMOUS MARRIAGES
ALEAN AL-KRENAWI & JOHN R. GRAHAM, 2006
"Swiss-born Ramadan, whose grandfather,
Hassan al Banna, founded the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, is a controversial figure
who has both been praised as a reformist and denounced as a radical for his theories
on Western society -- namely how modern Islam will shape Europe, which he claims
is in decline."
"I will not give precise details of the acts he has done to me.
It is enough to know that he has benefited greatly from my weakness,” Ayari wrote.
She said in her book that when she rebelled
against him at one point he screamed at her, insulted her, slapped her and treated
her violently.
“I confirm today, that the famous Zubair
is Tariq Ramadan,” Ayari published on Facebook.
Prominent Muslim scholar Tariq Ramadan accused
of rape, sexual assault in France, FRANCE24, 2017-10-21
"In recent years, debate in the
West, and subsequently in Muslim-majority countries, has focused on the more visible
aspects of the “status of women in Islam.” This is indeed an essential issue, but
reducing it to a passionate, oversimplified debate about a list of “problem practices”
has led to evading the heart of the matter. The issue of “Muslim women” is being
bandied about today as if it characterised the irreconcilable relationship between
Islam and the West, the opposition between a universe of submission and another
holding the promise of freedom, with, of course, the leitmotiv of the contrast between
patriarchal traditions and western modernity said to be an increasingly feminine
viewpoint.
Then the list of discriminations related
to dress, polygamy, violence, inheritance, and other issues. is repeated again and
again. Aside from the fact that the substance of the claims presented here is open
to debate (while of course, the nature of the discriminations Muslim women may face
today must not be understated), it seems imperative to broaden the scope of the
debate and return to the sources and fundamentals of representations and discourses"
"Emine, has praised the harem as
an "educational establishment" during a speech. Her husband had also made
controversial remarks on motherhood on International Women's Day."
Turkish
first lady praises Ottoman-era harem for 'preparing women for life' The wife of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, DW, Date 10.03.2016
"Middle East on a roll to repeal 'marry
the rapist' laws, Rape-marriage exoneration laws are relics of
the colonial past. It's time to leave them there."
AlJazeera, by Rothna Begum, 24 AUGUST 2017
“Gender-based
violence in Afghanistan can take myriad, often less-than-subtle forms,
particularly in the most remote regions of the country. When human rights
worker Sadia Ekrami tried to speak about basic rights to a crowd of men in a
village in northern Afghanistan, she was threatened with death, and forced to
flee for her life. “Fortunately, I talked my way out of them killing me, but it
is an example of how women in Afghanistan who speak out can end up dead,” she
said.”
In Afghanistan, a Struggle to Leave No Woman or Child Behind, The Diplomat, By Tadamichi Yamamoto, December 04, 2017ppl
In Afghanistan, a Struggle to Leave No Woman or Child Behind, The Diplomat, By Tadamichi Yamamoto, December 04, 2017ppl
To
determine such legislative acts as colonial inspired (Other inspired) is a sickening
indictment of the intellectual decrepitude which infects our Marxist inspired Western
intellectual elite. Muslims do not need any outsiders to subjugate women to terror
exploitive constructs as they have done so since that madman Mohammad walked out
of his cave and started to have timely selfish visions as to how he could subjugate
women to his own desires on his terms. Allah BS.
What is the left
image above determining regards the status of women and women sexuality, and how
is the image on the right not connected to the left even though we can clearly see
such symbols exist worn by the 'victim' in the image on the right? Are your political
hands and conscience as clean as you desire to believe? The following
will provide evidence they are not, but of course despite the clarity it will be
of no surprise if you become even more convinced you have no need to judge yourself
so harshly.
"Women around
the world face online abuse, but in Pakistan, with its entrenched culture of discrimination
and violence against women, the threats are not idle. According to the Human Rights
Commission of Pakistan, about 500 Pakistani women are killed each year by family
members who believe their honor has been damaged if a female relative refuses an
arranged marriage, socializes with men or even claps and sings at a wedding."
Female Lawmaker in Pakistan Accuses Imran Khan
of ‘Inappropriate’ Texts. Abuse Follows., NYT, By MEHREEN ZAHRA-MALIK, AUG.
5, 2017
"A famous Iranian television
presenter, known in Iran for holding strong conservative positions on things
like women wearing the full veil, was snapped not only not wearing the veil,
but also drinking a beer. People on Iranian social media criticised her virulently
for her hypocrisy."
Asieh Amini is an Iranian activist
for women's rights. She lives in Norway.
"Wearing the hijab or not
drinking alcohol is not a choice in Iran: it's a legal obligation. It's a very
symbolic aspect of life in Iran, showing how the political class controls daily
life in public spaces [Editor's note: the punishment for someone drinking
alcohol in public can be up to 72 lashes].
This is why, very often, Iranians
have two parallel lives: a public life, which follows the law, and another life
that is more private, where they can behave like they really are. What we see
in these photos, is the reality of these two parallel lives."
Uproar
as a conservative Iranian journalist is snapped unveiled and drinking a beer,
France 24, 07/27/2017
“..the paradigms tells us what is real and how it works, to question the paradigm is to question the structure of the world itself, according to those within the paradigm that leads to nonsense, to think about the paradigm rather than through the paradigm is not to engage in science but philosophy.
Occasionally, however, anomalies pop-up....."
Professor Steven Gimbel, Professor of Philosophy. Gettysburg College, 2015
Professor Steven Gimbel, Professor of Philosophy. Gettysburg College, 2015
"As one Arab scholar observed, Muslim patriarchy considers female sexuality as extremely powerful but subversive to the social order (Mernissi, 1975). Women are taught from childhood that their sexuality is the inalienable and permanent property of the Hamula (extended family) rather than their own (Al-Krenawi & Graham, 1998). “Sexual purity and lineage honor are seen as inseparable” (Haj, 1992, p. 764, cited in Al-Krenawi & Graham, 2003), and a woman’s sexual identity is of concern to all. Awoman who is perceived to have strayed from the strict norms of sexual conduct, even if she is a victim of sexual abuse as a child, may be ostracized and even murdered to preserve family honor (Shalhoub-Kevorkian, 1999). Accordingly, women’s sexual integrity is maintained by ubiquitous forms of family and community surveillance and control."
The
Physical and Psychosocial, Health of Bedouin Arab Women of the Negev Area of
Israel, The Impact of High Fertility and Pervasive Domestic Violence, JULIE
CWIKEL, RACHEL LEV-WIESEL, ALEAN AL-KRENAWI, Ben Gurion University of the
Negev, 2003
Two men accused of kidnapping a
teenage make-up artist who was raped and murdered in an alleged “honour
killing” will stand trial in January next year, the Old Bailey heard today.
"Mujahid Arshid, 33, and
Vincent Tappu, 28, allegedly snatched 19-year-old Celine Dookhran from a
shower, tying her up with duct tape and rope and bundling her into a car.
She was allegedly raped by Arshid,
who is also accused of murdering her and dumping her body at a house in
Kingston. He and Tappu are also accused of kidnapping a second woman in the
same incident.
At a previous hearing, prosecutor
Binita Roscoe told Wimbledon magistrates Ms Dookhran was in a
relationship with an Arab Muslim, which was disapproved of because her family
are Indian Muslims."
"Experiences of polygamy in
this sample of American Muslim women were intertwined with abuse. All women
reported feeling that they were treated unfairly in comparison with other
wives, and all women perceived this as emotional abuse and religious failure on
the part of husbands. Also significant was the presence of cowives, who sometimes
were witnesses to abuse by husbands and sometimes acted as perpetrators
themselves."
POLYGAMY
AND WIFE ABUSE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY
OF MUSLIM WOMEN IN AMERICA, Dena
Hassouneh-Phillips, PhD, School of Nursing, Oregon Health Sciences University,
Portland, Oregon, USA, 2001
"There is no positioning of
media toward women whose husband practice polygamy. This is symbolic violence
because the programs created conviction to men that polygamy is not forbidden.
The program thus educates men to practice polygamy, and in a covert way,
encourages psychologically violence toward women."
SYMBOLIC
VIOLENCE IN EVERYDAY NARRATIONS: GENDER CONSTRUCTION
IN INDONESIAN TELEVISION, Wening Udasmoro,
Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, INDONESIA,
2013
"..video, posted on Facebook by
Women of Hizb ut-Tahrir Australia, showed two women discussing men
"disciplining their disobedient wives" by striking them with a short
stick, coiled scarf or piece of fabric."
Leaders
condemn domestic violence video, DANIEL MCCULLOCH, Australian Associated
Press, April 13, 2017
"Abdullah Rashid, 22, a Georgia
native who moved to Cedar-Riverside (USA) last year, has been making the rounds
in the Somali-dominated neighborhood, telling people not to drink, use drugs or
interact with the opposite sex. If he sees Muslim women he believes are dressed
inappropriately, he approaches them and suggests they should wear a jilbab, a long,
flowing garment. And he says he's recruiting others to join the effort."
Minneapolis
Muslims protest 'sharia' vigilante in Cedar-Riverside area, By Faiza
Mahamud Star Tribune, APRIL 13, 2017
"From the perspective of Saudi
women, Western women are not a good role model. In Saudi Arabia, Bedouin
culture means it is a sign of respect and dignity to cover yourself. It protects
the woman from the evil eye, and especially from a man’s desire and sexual
fantasy."
A
Distant Reality about Saudi Arabia, It
is not Norway’s problem that Saudi Arabian women are not allowed to drive a
car. NPR, by Saudi Ambassador Esam Abid Al Thagafi, April 26, 2017
Logic: Saudi women have no sexual
fantasies, are responsible for men's behavior, and therefore need to be subject
to cultural control, Saudi men as they do not cover themselves from head to toe
have no self-respect and are deviant sexual provocateurs.
""Female Genital
Mutilation has serious implications for the health and well-being of girls and
women," Daniel Lemisch, acting U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of
Michigan, said in a statement. "This brutal practice is conducted on girls
for one reason, to control them as women. .."
Detroit-area
doctors indicted in 'brutal' mutilation case, Samantha Schmidt The
Washington Post, 30/4/2017
And the Muslim cultural logic to
move from controlling women's sexuality by covering them in a sack under Mans
direction and blaming women for inciting Man enables what to inevitably be
analogised into reality?
"Indonesia's official Commission on Violence against Women reported that, as of August 2016, the number of discriminatory national and local regulations targeting women had risen to 422, from 389 at the end of 2015. They include local laws compelling women and girls to don the hijab, or headscarf, in schools, government offices, and public spaces. While many of these laws require traditional Sunni Muslim garb both for women and men, research by Human Rights Watch indicates they disproportionately target women.
A local bylaw implemented in August in Sumedang, West Java, forbids anyone with an “eye-catching appearance” from going out alone at night. The municipal government justified the regulation on the basis that it would help discourage sexual activity.
Human Rights Watch, Indonesia, Events of 2016
"Indonesia's official Commission on Violence against Women reported that, as of August 2016, the number of discriminatory national and local regulations targeting women had risen to 422, from 389 at the end of 2015. They include local laws compelling women and girls to don the hijab, or headscarf, in schools, government offices, and public spaces. While many of these laws require traditional Sunni Muslim garb both for women and men, research by Human Rights Watch indicates they disproportionately target women.
A local bylaw implemented in August in Sumedang, West Java, forbids anyone with an “eye-catching appearance” from going out alone at night. The municipal government justified the regulation on the basis that it would help discourage sexual activity.
Human Rights Watch, Indonesia, Events of 2016
Saudi
Arabia launches girls’ council, without the girls, Dhaka Tribune, March 14,
2017
Viral
Video Exposes Cultural Response to Rape in Tunisia We.News, Tharwa Boulifi,
21-3-2017
"MOROCCO is banning the
production and sale of Muslim full-face veils amid fears over terrorism,
according to local media.
...
The North African country’s interior
ministry is said to be cracking down on burqas due to reports that terrorists
have been wearing them when carrying out attacks.
...
But lawmaker Nouzha Skalli, a former
family and social development minister, heralded the ban as “an important step
in the fight against religious extremism”."
Morocco
BANS THE BURKA amid growing fears over terrorism, local media claims,
Express, By ZOE EFSTATHIOU, Wed, Jan 11, 2017
Morocco
Said to Ban Sale of Burqas, Citing Security Concerns, NTY, By AIDA ALAMI,
JAN. 11, 2017
There are two reasons given by
Moroccan officials for banning the burka, firstly security as men terrorists
are posing as women to elude detection and secondly as “an
important step in the fight against religious extremism”. The first
reason security overlooks the fact Muslim girls-women are terrorists and the
lack of a burqa makes no difference to the appearance of bloody piles of
victims, and the second reason “an important step in the fight
against religious extremism” appears to be a recognition the
burka is a symbol of attachment to so called Muslim extremism, whereas this may
have some truth, the fact women are wearing such a garment, as an article below
reveals, may be more to do with appearances forced upon some Muslim women
utilised to protect themselves from Muslim men and women altruistic
enforcers/punishers enforcing Muslim rules of 'purity'. The point is do
these ethics-rules of girls-womens 'purity' disappear, along with the
Muslim construct of Other or do they continue, as they have since the seventh
century, to deliver terror-genocide and tragic misogynistic outcomes from
Muslims dressed in Western skirts and suits. What has really changed? The Muslim
development process-infant-adult combined with the Muslim
categorisation-methodology systems for both women and Other? Result
equals?
"Linda Sarsour, a Brooklyn-born
Palestinian-American Muslim racial justice and civil-rights activist, told The
New York Times, "If you want to come to the march you are coming with the
understanding that you respect a woman's right to choose.""
What
the Women's March was missing, By Salena Zito, January 23, 2017
The absolute absurdity and tragic
irony of a Muslim woman determining women who support women being 'free' to
choose, women who are also against abuse of power economic political sexual
predatory behavior are not 'free' to choose to participate in a march to protect
women's right to say yes or no, as the contents of the argument in this
document attempts to prove beyond reasonable doubt, the very core Islamic codex
construct of Muslim women, and the cultural development-control process to
which Muslim infant-child-adolescent, adult females are subject to determines
Muslim women's 'free' choice as existent only within a subjective state of Mans
leadership and control of a woman's sexuality, alleviated only to the degree
Muslim women exist in an Other cultural ethical-belief social/political space
which enables access to increased relative independence. Yet even in Others
space the reality is many Muslim women remain firmly under a Muslim paradigm of
negligible agency.
Cultures particularly regards women
inform significantly different outcomes if allowed to do so, supporting such
cultures as a 'good' when what they systemically inform consistently across
space and time from their adherents behavioral variance is terror-genocide and
misogyny determines you as what - not a racist, bigot, xenophobe, Islamophobe -
really how nice for you. What do you not see, yes your own bloody hands and
culpability.
"Sharia law is bad, obviously.
But nowhere in the Quran is there any mention of Female Genital
Mutilation".= "Nazi ethics are bad obviously. But nowhere in Hitlers
Mein Kampf is there any mention of Gas." The point is the respective
codex enable both outcomes to occur and therefore the constructs of females the
Quran and Other in Mein Kampf have to justify and authorise in analogy,
inference such acts as normative.
Western and other cultural
constructs will be subject to change, even the nature of women's
clothing-linked to so called 'purity' an excuse for Mans actions inclusive of
rape, relative to the terror the Islamic/Muslim culture can and does in time
bring to bare - India is a case study on how this occurs as the Muslim
dominance terror-rape as cultural social engineering tool over time has had
differing regional effect. Kush Kahn in responding to the question Is
the Hindu culture against women wearing short dresses? on Quora has an
insightful response on how cultural constructs of Indian women are affected
regionally by acceptance imposed or otherwise by external cultural constructs
of women.
Your view of course the Muslim
construct of women can be, will be changed in time with the obvious Western
definitions-categorisation benefits and 'rightness' of women's equality and autonomous
control of women's own bodies will be realised - wrong as the Muslim cultural
constructs-rituals inform continuing raised levels of male aggression and
women's acceptance of their condition as normative, taking outliers as
indication this is not true in a Western ideological dominated space ignores
the statistics as the Muslim population grows and globalisation enables
altruistic enforcers/punishers to operate effectively across nation borders the
ideal state from a Western developed ideological perspective is diminished and
the Muslim normative state for women increasingly manifest - reality
“Things are getting worse and worse.”.
“Things are getting worse and worse.”.
"On Thursday, Captain Rahmani
revealed that she had applied for asylum this summer, saying she felt unsafe in
Afghanistan, where she and her family have received death threats. For the last
15 months, she has been training at air bases in Arkansas, Florida and Texas.
Captain Rahmani said that her Afghan
male colleagues in the air force treated her with contempt and that she felt at
risk.
“Things are not changing” for the
better in Afghanistan, Captain Rahmani said in an interview on Friday. “Things
are getting worse and worse.”
Afghan
Response to Female Pilot’s U.S. Asylum Case: ‘I Am Sure She Lied’, NYT, By
JAWAD SUKHANYAR, DEC. 25, 2016
Gunmen
in Afghanistan Kill 5 Female Airport Employees, NYT, By TAIMOOR SHAH and
MUJIB MASHAL, DEC. 17, 2016
"The use of force and violence
is more commonplace and prevalent in some families, communities, religions,
cultural/ethnic groups and societies based on the views and values about adult
prerogatives with children espoused. They may also be based upon the sociopathy
of the perpetrators." Treatment of Complex Trauma
Courtois/Ford @2016
Sociopathy groups of people who
adopt belief systems which cause them to behave in a similar fashion.
"Barnett Pearce and Stephen
Littlejohn, two well-known communication scholars, point out that our values
tend to be embedded in clusters and are essential to our sense of order and
function in the world, essential to holding communities and cultures together.
... A challenge to any one value in such a cluster threatens to unravel the
whole."
Moral and Cultural Conflicts,
Michael Dues, Senior Lecturer in Communication University of Arizona
"Every set of beliefs
introduces its own logic and its own constraints."
Distinguishing
Spiritual from Temporal Power, Inventing the Individual, The origins of Western
Liberalism, Larry Siedentop, 2014
“When
we describe one of our friends as rational, we often want to imply that they
are dispassionate, logical, thoughtful, and in control of their actions.
However,
to a decision scientist, “rational” means “consistency with some model.”
Rational decisions are not necessarily dispassionate, nor well-reasoned, nor
selfish. They aren’t even necessarily good decisions, from others’
perspectives. They simply are consistent.
Rational
choice models do not assume anything about what a decision maker prefers; they
only state that those preferences consistently lead to choices.
Rational
does not mean that a decision was generated by a conscious or logical or
reasoned process. Instead, rationality refers to the outcome of
decisions."
Behavioral Economics: When Psychology and Economics Collide, S. Huettel,
2014
"Culture is not only what
people think, it is also what they do. Ideally, cultural explanations would
also strive to be mutually non-contradictory ...
Culture, although it cannot ‘do’
anything on its own, provides a framework through which people are motivated to
act. Subsequently, incidents of violence are individually and socially understood
through narrative, that is, through the stories which are developed by
participants, observers and the institutions which deal with them (such as the
courts and media). These narratives, in turn, can express motivations or
justifications for further violence or, alternatively, for its avoidance or
suppression.”
Wood, J. Carter (2007).
Conceptualizing cultures of violence and cultural change. In: Carroll, Stuart
ed. Cultures of Violence: Interpersonal Violence in Historical Perspective.
Palgrave Macmillan.
"Without the ceaseless
pulsating heartbeat of our categorization engine, we would understand nothing
around us, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to
anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action.
…..every culture constantly,
although tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic
labels that come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and
entities"
SURFACES AND ESSENCES, ANALOGY AS
THE FUEL AND FIRE OF THINKING, Douglas Hofstadter (American professor of
cognitive science), Emmanuel Sander (French Psychologist-Developmental
Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, Educational Psychology), 2013
What does this mean, it means what
social psychologists know for a fact, cultures infant-child-adolescent-adult
development process via a cultures families--communities-institutions based
upon their not your ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation and
political-social methodology will, not may form adherent behavioral variances
potentially significantly different than your own and inform inherently tragic
consequences for women and Other.
"..children raised in religious
households, who are perceived to be more empathetic and sensitive to justice,
are in fact less altruistic to their own class mates .... children from
religious households also differ in their ratings of deserved punishment for
interpersonal harm (F(2, 847) = 5.80, p < 0.01, h2 = 0.014); this was
qualified by significantly harsher ratings of punishment by children from Muslim
households than children from non-religious households (p < 0.01). There
were no significant differences between children from Christian households and
non-religious households.".
The Negative Association between
Religiousness and Children’s Altruism across the World, November 05, 2015
"This value (or lack of)
assigned to women and their bodies, although entrenched in social systems, is a
product of power structures that revolve around the sex-role socialization of
males and females that shape understanding of acceptable interactions between
the two sexes. Therefore, it is the administration of the violence that is
gendered as the types of harm perpetrated against women take on different forms
than those suffered by men."
State, Crime, Women and Gender,
Victoria E. Collins, 2016
The "types
of harm perpetrated against women take on different forms than those suffered
by men." as necessarily will the outward signs of symbolic acceptance of
women of the culpability for the "cultural harm perpetrated against
women take on different forms than those suffered by men.". The
nature and degree of the delineation symbolism being necessarily relative to
the degree cultural "power structures" ethics-beliefs-rules-systems
determine women as subject to man's leadership, sexual control and responsible
for man’s behavior towards them. By accepting in your presence
without objection the outward signs of symbolic acceptance of women's
culpability for men's behavior and subjugation to men's leadership you enable
what to continue to occur at your feet.
'No protection for unmarried
women
For Frank Seidler there are coercive
and childhood intercourse. The man with the sparse head hair and the more
impressive gray noise beard is a psychotherapist and chairman of the European
Missionary Community (EMG). He says, "For many people who come here, we
are the last hope."
....
Often the Muslim women - from Iran,
from Afghanistan or the Caucasus - are looking for a way out of their marriage
and therefore are rejected by their families. In a culture where people live
strictly according to the rules of the Koran, a woman is only honorable if she
has a husband, says Seidler. That leaves the men free: they could deal with
them as they please.
Sabina Nazarian works as an
interpreter for Farsi and Dari at EMG. She fled Afghanistan from Germany many
years ago, declaring: "When a woman divorces, she has no value or
protection in society." She is then free of birds. This leads to the fact
that some women are tortured for years - and bear it in silence. "It's
embarrassing," says Nazarian. "They're afraid that they'll be more
expelled when they talk."
Debate
on childhood In German small towns, helpers fight for children's brides
11.23.2016,·FOCUS-Online Editor Wera Engelhardt (Penkun)
Saudi
women file 'enslaving' petition to challenge sexist law, RT 26 Sep, 2016
A liberal mother
of six jailed for challenging Saudi taboos, AP, AYA BATRAWY. Nov. 7, 2016
Moroccan TV show giving women tips on
hiding domestic violence bruises provokes outrage.
Peta
Credlin: It sickens me when you can’t condemn the horror of child brides, PETA
CREDLIN, The Sunday Telegraph, September 25, 2016
"The Family Court of Australia has
refused a Muslim husband’s effort to divorce his wife under Islamic law under conditions
that would have left her with 10 per cent of their million-dollar property pool.
The wife, who cannot be named but is
known in court documents as Ms Basra, appealed to the Family Court for help after
her husband attempted to get out of the marriage, which produced three children,
for $100,000, despite having more than $1 million in assets.
The husband, known as Mr Ahmed, wanted
the court to recognise an Islamic divorce he says took place on his porch in 2009,
with a sheik and several other men as witnesses. But Ms Basra denied she had taken
part in such a ceremony and produced an official document from Beirut that recorded
her husband as married to two women — herself and a second wife — rather than having
been divorced and remarried.
The court heard the couple was married
in an Islamic ceremony in Australia, and again in Lebanon in July 1997, when Ms
Basra was 18. He was 10 years older. The Lebanese marriage was recognised under
Australian law.
Mr Ahmed told the court, with judge Garry
Watts presiding, that he divorced his wife in 2009 in front of a sheik and “a number
of other men” from the community."
Judge
backs wife: Islamic ‘divorce on the porch’ not on, The Australian, CAROLINE
OVERINGTON, October 25, 2016
You can justify such significantly 'different symbolic
forms than those suffered by men', even the clear lack of cultural necessity
for men to symbolise their relative societal power position which invariably resides
solely in the public-private persona construct of women, are not achieved by significant
cultural socialisation penalty-violence nor the threat of it to achieve acceptance
of such stark symbolic disparity. Never reflected upon the necessity of relative
levels of cultural violence needed to achieve and maintain such a state of disparity,
inequality between two human groups?
"As noted by Ballinger (2007), “the
state’s role in women’s oppression is subtle to the point where it appears to be
gender-neutral – or even protective towards women – by seemingly regulating the
system to prevent further oppression” (p. 474). The state distracts away from
its culpability by presenting any inequities and harms caused to women as being
a product of individual actors. Instead of examining the culpability of states
and their acts and omissions that allow for these harms to occur, such behaviors
have been explained away as being representative of heteronormative sexuality that
revolves around male dominance and female passivity (O’Toole et al., 2007). The
state covers up its complicity, distracting away from the harms it causes, harms
that constitute state crime...
Indirect forms of state-perpetrated violence
against women are more nuanced, hidden, and institutionalized than direct forms.
They stem from state behaviors and acts, or lack thereof, that facilitate and reify
violence against women. These include institutionalized inequities that women experience
that are built into the social, economic and political systems in a particular society.
..state-organized crime should include
behaviors committed by state officials in the course of their employment (Chambliss,
1990), as well as acts that inadequately constrain harmful and criminal behavior
(Kramer & Michalowski, 1990)."
State Crime, Women and Gender, Victoria
E. Collins, 2016
The rationale of 'State culpability' separates
a cultural tool of management-enforcement-reality testing from the cultural codex-ideology
development process which creates and sustains the State. The State is a mere cultural
management mechanism emerging from and reflecting a cultural-view-value-belief-methodology.
Harm is derived from cultural constructs enforced by the State via action or inaction
at the behest of culture. Where 'state' appears in the above quoted paragraph 'culture'
necessarily merges with it. For as we see in conjunction with the State denying
culpability and assigning "inequities and harms caused to women as being
a product of individual actors" so does the specific culture from which
the "inequities and harms" are derived.
'individual actors' necessarily
need therefore to be determined as deviants from the 'true' codex, and importantly
when the harm behavior fails to be prevented by the State/Culture, as the State/Culture's
continuing legitimacy resides in the promise of security & improved circumstance
not diminishing, 'individual actors' no matter how many, inform generic
criminal rather than cultural derived behavior, are mentally ill, obsessed, possessing
a self-serving grievance derived outside cultural socialisation. The tragedy particularly
for women are even the "norms" invariably inform "inequities
and harms" and the enforcers and beneficiaries determined as 'protectors'.
My argument is not that State actors
should not be held accountable for the decisions they make, by action or inaction,
they must be and hopefully they in future will be, but simply, if you want to achieve
change, it has to be recognised culture needs to be held culpable for the "inequities
and harms" its behavioral variance systematically informs. It is also a warning
appealing via written communication with the Emperor-State, as the Roman/Greek pagans
attempted to do to achieve 'justice' and cessation of "inequities
and harms" being perpetrated by the 'individual Christian actors', 'the few', in the hope
of preventing their Roman/Greek pagan culture from being destroyed is a waste of
time. The most you can expect is "More Romans/Greeks are killed in
chariot accidents than by a few rampaging deviant obsessed christian monks." . Go direct
to the cause the cultural codex, remove it or change nothing it will simply continue
to be analogised and given the opportunity as with all iniquitous constructs inform
in time infamy we cannot even imagine.
ISIS
Radicals Chainsaw 9 Iraqi Youths in Half for Belonging to Anti-ISIS Group, By
Stoyan Zaimov , Christian Post Reporter, September 1, 2016
You, yes you, really believe an ideological
template whose codex can derive the justification and authorisation to analogise
such behavior as chainsawing humans in half and the same horror replicated in similar
acts across time Genocide
against Christians in the Middle East, Armenian genocide, etc should be allowed
for even a minute more than humanity can help in public and private spheres along
with its symbols of adherence to such infamy as the burqa to continue to inform
the same?
What follows is only an infinitesimal
fraction of pure infamy of what is attached all the way along the thread of such
'freely' worn cultural fashioned cloth to the Muslim cultural bitter end for which
the Muslim culture and the 'good' continue to be culpable for delivering to humanities
streets.
'un-Koranic custom' some claim
applies to some if not all of the above clothing constructs to the left above and
to the genital mutilation to the right 'to eliminate sexual depravity'. The fact such
constructs exist means it is 'Koranic-custom', for if it were not the constructs
would not exist. Why is this true? Not all cultural constructs of any culture are
explicitly detailed in text, yet their existence means they are to be necessarily,
as are most beliefs-values-behaviors of any culture, derived from cultural development
processes-capable of being analogized from cultural codex -textual and/or exemplar
templates posing no contradiction to either, for to do so questions the validity
of the creator - the derived justification and authorisation for behavior-methodology.
An adherent in one part of a cultural
behavioral variance determining a sacred codex construct is old and no longer applicable
and therefore does not reflect the 'true' religion-ideology is a ridiculous view
for all codex constructs ever invented may be so determined - the behavior exists
and therefore can by its existence be analogised from the 'true' religion-ideology
as determined by an adherent in a point within the exact same cultural behavioral
variance.
An adherent particularly of a culture
with a dense network subsystem have to be capable of deriving justification and
authorisation for their beliefs-values-behaviors from their cultural codex otherwise
the penalty for deviance could be quite severe. As we can clearly see with cultural
penalty being applied to Muslim women and even Other women regarded as deviant.
So what such punishment is not as heinous
for deviation within an Other dominated space or in certain circumstances in a cultures
dominated space - there has to be a cultural penalty otherwise there would not be
conformity regards the behavior. Adherents have to perceive in any cultural action
a perceived benefit and penalty for adhering or not adhering to a cultural construct.
To determine any action by a human is a 'free' choice without any social consequences
is clearly an unsupportable position to take given the mountain of research providing
significant evidence to the contrary.
Are we to deny the existence of significant
numbers and their suffering because any number delusionally believe themselves to
be 'free' whilst around them their support for such a construct forces 'Most women to
suffer'?
"des hôtesses refusent" You must 'refusent' for to wear
such a cultural symbol of oppression informs evil.
"France,
the revolt of the hostesses of Air France against the headscarf requirement and
pants on the flight from Paris to Tehran" IlFattoQuotidiano.it
Leonardo Martinelli, April 3, 2016
In a rare criticism of the kingdom's
powerful "mutaween" police, the Saudi media has accused them of hindering
attempts to save 15 girls who died in the fire on Monday.
...
One witness said he saw three policemen
"beating young girls to prevent them from leaving the school because they were
not wearing the abaya".
The Saudi Gazette quoted witnesses as
saying that the police - known as the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and
Prevention of Vice - had stopped men who tried to help the girls and warned "it
is a sinful to approach them".
The father of one of the dead girls said
that the school watchman even refused to open the gates to let the girls out."
Flawed Justice After a Mob Killed an Afghan Woman,
New York Times, by Pulitzer Prize winner ALISSA J.
RUBIN, DEC. 26, 2015
Pakistani
woman dies after being set on fire for rejecting marriage proposal By Azadeh
Ansari and Sophia Saifi, CNN, June 1, 2016
No cultural pressure to conform? Free choice to be subjugated/subjugate?
Islamic
State tightens grip on captives held as sex slaves AP, By LORI HINNANT,
MAYA ALLERUZZO and BALINT SZLANKO, JUL, 5,2016
"Rachid Rezouali, a former
police chief, said private funders want "to appear like God's servants in
the eyes of the people." He called the changing social landscape "a
sign that an Algeria of tolerance and modernity is disappearing."
The U.S. State Department's
International Religious Freedom Report for 2015 says volunteer imams at 55
mosques in Algiers were replaced for "spreading Salafism." But the
report also noted a social media campaign ahead of last year's Ramadan urging
men to avoid retribution by forcing their wives, daughters and sisters to dress
according to conservative Islamic values.
No dress-related reprisals happened,
perhaps because fashion already has become so prevalent.
For sociologist Nacer Djabi, the
growing number of women in traditional Muslim garb is a sign that Algeria is
reclaiming an identity subverted by more than a century of French rule. But, he
added, "Most women suffer it because of pressure from society.""
Fundamentalists
gain ground in Algeria as war memory fades, AP, by AOMAR OUALI, Aug. 20,
2016
"Hundreds of women took to the streets in Algiers, clashing with police officers, to demand new rights and the departure of the ruling elite."
Algerian women take to the streets in Algiers to demand reforms, SBS, 9-3-2012
"Hundreds of women took to the streets in Algiers, clashing with police officers, to demand new rights and the departure of the ruling elite."
Algerian women take to the streets in Algiers to demand reforms, SBS, 9-3-2012
"Javaria Saeed, a practicing
Muslim, resigned from the SO15 counter-terrorism division of the Metropolitan
Police, which was tasked with outreach to the Muslim community. She cited a
culture of “political correctness” and two specific cases, in which she alleged
a senior Muslim constable had called female genital mutilation (FGM) a “clean,
an honorable practice” that “shouldn’t be criminalized.” FGM is illegal in the
UK.
On another occasion, the same
officer reportedly said Muslim women who face domestic abuse should seek to
resolve the situation via sharia tribunals rather than going through the
courts.
Despite reporting the incidents to
her superiors, no action was taken against the offending officer.
Other officers called her a “bad
Muslim” for not wearing a hijab (head covering) and said she would be “better
off at home looking after your husband.”
“My experiences were that it was
Muslim officers being racist towards my individual views; also in private,
holding racist views against white officers, and sexist views against females,”
she told the Sunday Times. “If such views were held and expressed by white
officers, they would be fired.”
Facebook
Censors Discussion On Sharia, Facebook
censored a video allegedly showing the execution of gay people by jihadis in
Libya, from the page "Should America Fear Sharia." BY ELLIOT
FRIEDLAND Mon, September 12, 2016
Female
bodybuilder is thrown in jail in Iran for posting 'un-Islamic' photographs of
her workouts online , By Afp and Chris Summers,18 January 2017
"Qandeel Baloch has
been killed, she was strangled to death by her brother. Apparently it was an
incident of honour killing," Sultan Azam, senior police officer in Multan,
told AFP.
"My daughter was innocent, we
are innocent, we want justice, why was my daughter killed?" Baloch's
father Azeem Ahmad told reporters there."
Pakistani
social media celebrity dead in suspected honour killing by own brother, 9
news, July 17, 2016
"My daughter was innocent, we
are innocent" - No, the daughter was not determined innocent by the very
'rational' system of which the father is an adherent and the son, who the
father determined was to be subject to the cultural codex, development process,
and dense network system which inevitably led to this fathers daughters murder
as hundreds of thousands since the seventh century and millions to come if this
fathers, sons, mothers and even the daughter's cultural codex categorisation
engine of women, development process and dense network systems are not removed
from humanities public and private spheres. Both the daughter and the family of
the daughter are guilty and the culture they adhere to culpable for another
murder of Other.
Burkini
ban: The garment's Australian designer says the French are 'digging a hole' for
themselves ABC 18/8/2016
The only 'hole being
dug' are for women who have to suffer the consequences of such
behavior, of such obscenity promoted as 'modesty' underwriting an ideology,
acceptance and promotion of the view women are responsible men's behaviour
towards them and as a sign of subservience to an ideology of social confinement
and control by men as a good. France simply understands liberty and equality
regards women are not simply definitions to be subject to whims of cultural
tyranny.
“Turkish President Recep Tayyip
Erdogan has rejected the idea of emancipation of women through greater
financial independence by saying that women who trade the role of a mother and
a housewife for a career, are “half-persons.”
A woman who refuses maternity and
gives up housekeeping faces the threats of losing her freedom. She is lacking
and is a half [a person] no matter how successful she is in the business
world.”
"I would recommend having at
least three children," Erdogan said.
Erdogan’s Justice and Development
Party (AKP) based its political platform on conservative Islamic traditions and
uses religious justifications to advocate values and policies. Last week, the
Turkish president spoke against birth control, saying that devout Muslims would
never use contraception. In March during the celebration of the International Women’s
Day, he said that a woman is “above all else a mother,” in a speech full of
quotes from Koran on the virtues of motherhood."
Women
choosing career over children are 'half-persons' – Erdogan T Published
time: 6 Jun, 2016
'“The Almighty created woman to bear
and raise children,” he added. “[Circumcision] would not affect that. Women
would not stop giving birth. But there would be less promiscuity.” said Ismail
Berdiyev, a senior Muslim cleric from Dagestan “all women” should be subjected
to the practice to eliminate sexual depravity.'
Outrage
in Russia after religious leaders back female genital mutilation, Roland
Oliphant, The Telegraph,18 AUGUST 2016
You support a cultural codex which
enables a man to determine women are the core source of depravity and women not
men should be subject to the removal of parts of their sexual organs to achieve
docility? Is the Islamic/Muslims definition of 'modesty' 'digging a hole' for
France or for women, and not only Muslim women?
With the Russian political elite
again unleashing the Christian Orthodox to once more join the hands of Church
and Emperor it is another example of how hard fought rights for women requires
eternal vigilance and alas continuing sacrifice due to the fact religious
constructs of women are allowed to remain without severe censure and removal from
humanities private and public spheres.
"Women are at the
mercy of this heinous and un-Koranic custom. Every day we get cases of women's
lives destroyed on a whim like this. Some women are not even aware they have
been divorced. They learn much later," said the BMMA's convener, Noorjehan
Safia Niaz.
But the group faces opposition not
just from the predictably outraged conservative Muslim male establishment, who
say the custom is sanctioned scripture. It also gets a chilly reception from
Indian politicians who fear that, if they back the demand, powerful Muslim
leaders will order their brethren not to vote for them on the grounds that
their faith is under attack.
This despite a government committee
recommending last year that the practice should be banned because it
"makes wives extremely vulnerable and insecure regarding their marital
status". India does not have a uniform civil code. Instead, each religious
community is allowed to have its own laws governing marriage and divorce."
Does
this degrade women? 'Triple talaq' reflection urged during Ramadan SMH, by
Amrit Dhillon, June 17, 2016
Not religion when it comes to
informing oppression? You seriously claim to be representing 'freedom' the good side of
morality for women by supporting such a cultural codex which enables the above
Islamic/Muslim codex analogised Islamic/Muslim cultural version of 'freedom'
for women to be increasingly manifest before you? Is the Islamic/Muslim culture
aligning to the hard fought Modernity construct of women as its Western
defenders and internal Muslim 'moderates' promised it would - can it even do so
given its codex necessarily "mutually non-contradictory"
constructs?
"Culture is not only what
people think, it is also what they do. Ideally, cultural explanations would
also strive to be mutually non-contradictory ...
Culture, although it cannot ‘do’
anything on its own, provides a framework through which people are motivated to
act. Subsequently, incidents of violence are individually and socially
understood through narrative, that is, through the stories which are developed
by participants, observers and the institutions which deal with them (such as
the courts and media). These narratives, in turn, can express motivations or
justifications for further violence or, alternatively, for its avoidance or
suppression.”
Wood, J. Carter (2007).
Conceptualizing cultures of violence and cultural change. In: Carroll, Stuart
ed. Cultures of Violence: Interpersonal Violence in Historical Perspective.
Palgrave Macmillan.
This is what the Islamic/Muslim
cultural construct of women enables own it, all of it from the scarf to female
genital mutilation to being burnt alive for not wearing the abaya to having
your head cut off for not wearing the veil properly to being shot in the head
for......... are you that callous towards your own gender to allow such a
cultural codex to remain in place to continue to analogise the same and worse
for do we not see regards Muslim behavior as time passes depths that would have
been impossible to conjure unless you were a Muslim violent, radical,
fanatical, psychotic nihilist?
"It is very clear what I mean,
which is that there is a violent, radical, fanatical, nihilistic interpretation
of Islam by a faction … within the Muslim community that is our enemy, and that
has to be defeated."
Obama:
To Stop Terrorism Islam Must Reconcile Itself To Modernity April 4, 2016 by
Michael Stone
The Islamic/Muslim culture
continues to set these creatures into humanities streets for without violence
the Islamic/Muslim culture would simply fade away. No culture generates such
altruistic aligners/enforcers/punishers with such a cultural defined nature for
no purpose.
Women under the Islamic/Muslim
culture are 'free to choose' we are told. It is a lie, as we can clearly see
for even Other women are subject to such evil imposition against their will
which is why France itself legislated against the draconian Muslim dress code
for women, because of its symbolism of women's submission to Man untenable in the
streets of any society which determines liberty and equality for women a right
not an option. Even Other cultures women are to deny their sexuality and 'cover
up' this is free choose?
"When people argue that Wonder
Woman should ‘cover up,’ I don’t quite get it," Gadot says. "They
say, ‘If she’s smart and strong, she can’t also be sexy.’ That’s not fair. Why
can’t she be all of the above?"
But Gadot doesn’t see it that way,
intimating that Wonder Woman’s sexuality and style of dress is part of her
agency. She also suggests that efforts to modify the current iteration of
Wonder Woman are a reflection of our culture’s inability to see women as
three-dimensional beings, in control of their mind, body, and sexuality."
Gal
Gadot on the Wonder Woman U.N. backlash: 'This is what you’re protesting?',
Jaleesa M. Jones , USA TODAY 3:13 p.m. EST December 20, 2016
Liberty is not the freedom of a
culture to seek submission of women and/or Other cultures via their cultural
indoctrination process and altruistic enforcement mechanisms utilising violence
or the threat of it to maintain and advance their cultural codex tyranny.
You support the left image above you
support the image on the right and in between because the Islamic/Muslim
cultural codex construct of women as subject, as less, as responsible for Man's
own heinous behavior against women analogises into both.
"Without the ceaseless
pulsating heartbeat of our categorization engine, we would understand nothing
around us, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to
anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action.
....
every culture constantly, although
tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic labels that
come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and
entities"
SURFACES AND ESSENCES, ANALOGY AS
THE FUEL AND FIRE OF THINKING, Douglas Hofstadter (American professor of
cognitive science), Emmanuel Sander (French Psychologist-Developmental
Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, Educational Psychology), 2013
A cultural 'rational' model
'categorisation engines' necessarily create interlinking cultural symbols with ethics-values-beliefs-motivation-behaviors
which are able to be authoritatively and justifiably inferred, analogised as
existing within the 'true' meaning of the cultural codex informing
non-contradictory discourse, for if a cultural codex enabled contradictory
discourse such discourse would tend to enable challenge to the veracity of the
whole cultural codex for if clear contradiction exists in one part are the
creator(s) infallibility in the rest of the codex to be taken for granted?
Such contradiction would
immediately pose a threat to the authority and justification foundation for the
actual beneficiary of the cultural codex categorisation engines, there has to
be a cultural derived beneficiary otherwise the categorisation engine would
have never been created in the first place - the beneficiary may be the
cultural whole but invariably as humanity and women to their cost find the
beneficiary are a select group within the culture.
To determine the left image above
does not inform the image on the right and vice versa is therefore an error for
in examining the cause of one leads you inexorably to the cause of the other.
The beneficiary of the cultural categorisation engine which determines as
'good'/'proper'/'modest' the wearing of the Abaya, Chador, Burqa, Purdah,
Kerundung, .. as well as genital mutilation, subjugation of women to mans
'leadership, condoned violence against women, women's culpability for mans
heinous actions against women, control of women's sexuality .... is?
"This law
makes a man insecure," he told journalists."
MEHREEN ZAHRA-MALIK
The little 'man' is the
beneficiary of women's subjugation for who creates the cultural rules in the
first place utilising whatever device be it determining women the 'weaker' sex
requiring 'protection', of hysterical disposition, responsible for men's
feelings and actions, or even the invention of a fictitious all powerful being
to justify and authorise infamy, for would such imposition and maintenance of
such obvious brutal inequity against women, let alone against Other cultures,
ever be able to be authorised and justified on mere mortal scientific derived
rationale and logic?
“A husband should be allowed to
lightly beat his wife if she defies his commands and refuses to dress up as per
his desires; turns down demand of intercourse without any religious excuse or
does not take bath after intercourse or menstrual periods,” the draft bill,
which has not been finalised, says.
In the proposal, the council advises
men to beat their wives if they refuse to dress as he wishes her to, talk to
strangers or speak loudly. Wives may also be reprimanded if they give anyone
money without the husband giving her permission first."
Men
should ‘lightly beat’ their wives if they refuse sex, according to Islamic
council leader, Fionn Hargreaves, staff writers and AFP News Corp Australia
Network, MAY 30, 2016
Islamic/Muslims codex (textual
words and exemplar (messianic) behavioral templates) strung together, as with
any other cultural codex be it secular or religious, are not created for no
cultural reason/purpose they are there to inform action. Such cultural codex
may not specifically lay down in one form, for instance in text the, exact
behavior to be followed yet the authenticity and justification for specific
form will be found in historical and existing cultural norms and importantly
can be inferred, analogised from the codex itself as being representative of
the 'true' belief-value.
If a repeatedly observed cultural
behavior across generations exists it will be non-contradictory specific,
inferred or analogised within the authority and justification of the cultural
codex. Claiming a behavior is not specifically defined within codex and
therefore not of the cultural codex ignores the existence of a cultural
rationale and logic which inevitably leads to the behavior for the proof it
does is right in front of you. Islamic/Muslims codex (textual words and
exemplar (messianic) behavioral templates) are strung together to inform
complete control of women's sexuality and as the evidence before humanity
proves daily are not benign nor beneficial for women.
You cannot pick and choose which
outcome you favor or support under such a construct without then approving the
exact same construct of women which informs the rest. Each provides validation
for the other. One cultural codex constructed outcome cannot exist without the
other.
In supporting the wearing of the
Abaya, Chador, Burqa, Purdah, Kerundung etc determines you an advocate of what
cultural 'rational' model categorisation of women which informs not only the
wearing of such symbols of tyranny but the very enabling of tyranny against
women. Will any amount of colour or cut of material cover the tragedy you are
enabling?
"The practice of female genital
mutilation is more widespread, and affects many more women and girls, than
previously thought, according to a new report from Unicef. As the Guardian notes, the initiation rite is
often performed on girls as young as five, even if their parents don’t consent.
The total number of women living
with the consequences of genital mutilation or cutting is 200 million
worldwide—70 million more than reported in 2014. The massive hike is due in
part to population growth, and in part to new data collected in Indonesia, one
of three countries—along with Egypt and Ethiopia—that account for half of all
female genital mutilation victims globally."
SO
MANY: Unicef:
98% of women in Somalia have undergone female genital mutilation by Cassie
Werber QUARTZ 6-2-2016
New statistical report on
female genital mutilation shows harmful practice is a global concern – UNICEF 5 February 2016
"The disasters brought upon
women in the name of religion but more so by the religion of Islam is a
disgrace to humanity. There has been plenty of derision handed out to women
from Christianity in the past but we as women never had to endure genital
mutilation; being fully clothed in black clothing, which would be horrendous in
summer, to stop men from being sexually aroused by our faces and bodies and
never had to have 4 male witnesses before reporting a rape. The list goes on. I
met countless educated women in the ME (Middle East) who vowed they would never
marry because it would be impossible to find a decent man who would be kind to
her. Very sad." an Australian woman's perspective 2016.
To determine it is only a 'few' and
the infamy the 'few' inform does not impact negatively upon the 'many' even
within their own cultural space and the 'many' are satisfied with their
cultural social derived condition given the knowledge of ideological
alternatives to understand what 'decent' 'kind' actually means under an
Islamic/muslim cultural categorisation engine is simply dangerous delusion. For
this delusion informs political outcomes which continue to deliver subjugation
of 'many' women and with it diminished and brutalised lives.
UNICEF Finding: 'THE
MAJORITY OF PEOPLE IN COUNTRIES WITH DATA THINK THE PRACTICE SHOULD END' the reason
it does not end is because 'majorities', the so called non radicalised,
'moderate' law abiding adherents of any cultural codex particularly one
informing infamy against Other and women which necessarily have strong network
systems do not determine the boundaries of their own cultural behavioral
variance as they do not have cultural codex justification and authorisation for
doing so and as social psychology research informs us the 'few' altruists
aligners/enforcers/punishers coming from the very ranks of the 'majority' do
along with the so called 'minority' who support heinous cultural behavior,
cause such cultural practices to continue they are not 'tribal', not medieval,
not from another age and therefore you can excuse your own complicity they are
ethical-moral-values your culture enables now in the twenty-first century.
"Two women convicted over a
genital mutilation procedure on two girls have shown no remorse and only
offered "qualified, ambiguous and self-serving" apologies, a NSW
(Australian) court has heard."
Women convicted over 'repugnant' genital mutilation of two
girls 'showed no remorse' Australia ABC 6-2-2016
"even if their parents don’t
consent" -There is no such thing as Free Choice, Self-Determination,
Freedom, unrestricted agency only what your culture determines in space
(context) and/or what Other cultures if dominant in your space suppress or
enable. You are an adherent of a cultural codex containing heinous constructs
you cannot therefore determine yourself not culpable for the infamy it informs
as for any cultural 'rational' system each conduct/governance construct are non
contradictory and cross supporting - “To make one exception means to make
them all.”.
"The whole law is wrong,"
Muhammad Khan Sherani, the head of the Council of Islamic Ideology said at a
news conference, citing verses from the Koran to point out that the law was
"un-Islamic."
The council's decision this January
to block a bill to impose harsher penalties for marrying off girls as young as
eight or nine has angered human rights activists.
The Women's Protection Act, passed
by Pakistan's largest province of Punjab last week, gives unprecedented legal
protection to women from domestic, psychological and sexual violence. It also
calls for the creation of a toll-free abuse reporting hot line and the
establishment of women's shelters.
But since its passage in the Punjab
assembly, many conservative clerics and religious leaders have denounced the
new law as being in conflict with the Muslim holy book, the Koran, as well as
Pakistan's constitution (Islamic knowledge, cultural norms and law)."
Top
Pakistani religious body rules women's protection law "un-Islamic"
ISLAMABAD BY MEHREEN ZAHRA-MALIK
"he (Imam
Maulana Habib Ur Rehman of Glasgow Central Mosque) says: "I cannot hide my pain today. A
true Muslim was punished for doing which [sic] the collective will of the
nation failed to carry out."
Glasgow mosque
leader praises extremist killer By Calum McKay BBC Scotland 25 March 2016
"• Parents do not have the
confidence to argue against the articulate and forceful activists who seek to
impose their views, for fear of being branded as disloyal to their faith or
their community."
Schools face new curbs on extremism
after Birmingham Trojan horse affair Patrick Wintour, Political editor The
Guardian, Wednesday 23 July 2014
Muslim parents who would wish to
oppose altruists aligners/enforcers/punishers knowledge therefore have 'no
confidence to argue against' the so called Islamic/Muslim
extremists because the extremists are 'articulate and forceful', not because
of their innate rhetoric skills nor their propensity for violence or the threat
thereof but because of the simple fact the so called extremists hold the
Islamic/Muslim ethic-belief center/mean ground are not extremists in a
Islamic/Muslim rational system sense and therefore have the appropriate and
sufficient Islamic/Muslim knowledge justification and authorisation to support
their conduct and world-view as to the 'true' Islamic/Muslim governing
principles and methodology and enough Muslim parents have 'confidence' the so
called Islamic/Muslim extremists are the 'true believers' as they are that
humanity continually to this very day ends up with infamy blamed on the 'few'
who continually are derived from the ranks of the blameless 'many'.
"A New South
Wales supreme court judge says he has not seen any evidence that three people
convicted of female genital mutilation charges will work to stamp out the
practice in their community."
- 6-2-2016
You want to be no longer culpable
change architect and builder but there are two problems your
culture has to enable or Other cultures in the same space knowledge and a
secure cultural transition environment to even consider being a cultural defector.
A rational measure of the nature of your culture. whether or not it is worthy
of continuing adhering to, will be determined in major part by the relative
level and type of cultural punishment for attempting cultural transition. For
if your culture has a severe blasphemy and transition paradigm you can be
assured Other and even fellow adherents are dying as a direct result of your
codex constructs and almost certainly adherent women will be constructed as
less and subject to Man.
By showing tacit support for such a
culture and attacking those entities and persons seeking to hold such a culture
to account for the infamy such a culture systemically informs because of its
inherent cultural codex categorisation engine of Other and women what are you
as part of an aggregate political force culpable for?
"The Prime Minister, David
Cameron, is to announce the moves today in a blistering attack on the “passive
tolerance” of discriminatory practices inflicted on female members of the
country’s Muslim communities.
.....
In a move to confront men who exert
“damaging control over their wives, sisters and daughters”, he will announce a
review of the role of Britain’s religious councils, including Sharia
courts."
British
PM David Cameron lashes Muslim practices acting against women FRANCIS
ELLIOTT, THE TIMES, JANUARY 18, 2016
"THEY were kidnapped and then
subjected to months of brutal sexual assaults.
And is if being the sex slave of an
Islamic State fighter isn’t horrific enough, countless women and girls were
then subjected to further humiliation — barbaric and appalling virginity tests.
Those who escaped and survived to
reveal the horrors that they endured at the hands of Islamic State militants
were forced to undergo the tests conducted by Kurdistan officials, according to
Human Rights Watch.
BRUTAL TESTING ‘NOT RARE’
As barbaric as it sounds for rape
victims, virginity testing has also come under fire in Indonesia where female
police recruits have been reportedly subjected to the practice.
In a 2014 report, HRW said many
young women described the procedure as painful and traumatic.
In an interview with The Jakarta
Globe last year, General Moeldoko defended the procedure reportedly saying “so
what’s the problem? It’s a good thing, so why criticise it?”.
This comes despite Gen Moeldoko
(Indonesia) admitting there was no direct link between a woman being a virgin
and her abilities as a member of the armed forces."
Virginity
tests given to freed ISIS sex slaves after brutal rapes news.com.au JANUARY
29, 2016
Cultural codex constructs political
and social, cultural attractors, driven by cultural prescribed non
contradictory categorisation engines, dependent upon the relative independence
Other cultures (dominant or in minority) and nature in a specific time and
space allow will be, not may be, analogised within the
ethical-moral-values-beliefs-motivation and methodological behavioral bounds
set by the cultures historical conventions and normative settings justified and
authorised by the cultural codex itself and the development process
infant-child-adolescent-adult controlled by the so called non-radicalised, law
abiding (normative) families, communities and institutions, responsible for the
creation and sustaining of the 'few' altruistic
aligners/enforcers/punishers-cultural managers (imams-religious
leaders-advocates and perpetrators) of the cultural prescribed methodology.
Self-determinism as with freedom
simply does not exist there is only ever relative independence within cultural
set boundaries, ameliorated or diminished by Other cultures and nature in the
same time and space. Humans may have the same blood group but culture
determines the meaning you give to the context within which you move and your
reaction/behavior within that context. Research has found cultural prejudice is
set infant-child and nigh impossible to change thereafter. Determining a Muslim
woman in a Other cultural dominated and protected space can be taken seriously
when they proclaim they are ‘free’ and the Islamic construct of women enables
this to occur tragically ignores the relative diminishment of ‘free’ even
existing in her own streets let alone where the Islamic/Muslim culture is
dominant.
Therefore relative systemic risk is
not derived from an individual human self-determined behavioral variance but a
cultural imposed behavioral variance directly informed by how significantly the
‘rational’ system of one culture differs from another and the cultural
prescribed methodology of resolving those significant differences. It should be
noted when regarding political/social elites as indisputably intelligent beings
having achieved perceived rigorous intellectual heights religious or secular,
attend Oxford, and a Rhodes Scholar, and therefore a reliable witness as to
truth research has found the higher the measurable intelligence the greater the
determination one is the holder of ‘truth’ despite contrary evidence.
A culture, particularly cultures
with an inherent terror genocide construct of Other such as the Nazi and
Islamic/Muslim cultures, will invariably have along the cultures behavioral
variance, the non-radicalised reflecting back Others ethics-values-behaviors
diminishingly (dependent upon the degree of Other cultural domination and
protection-cultures like any organism tend to the pragmatic (adapt to context)
despite its true desired equilibrium state which it seeks in time to realize),
giving false hope of possible ‘reform’ or a false belief of the existence of a
‘true’ moderate safe ‘good’ version of ideology unlinked (which is logically
and rationally impossible), to conservative-moderate-‘radicalised’ extremist
‘true believer’ versions derived from the exact same cultural codex of which
all within the cultures behavioral variance determine as their ‘true’ and only
source of the justification and authorization for their
ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology.
The 'few' altruistic
aligners/enforcers/punishers-cultural managers (imams-religious
leaders-advocates and perpetrators) of the cultural prescribed methodology
maintain internal adherence, defend, and impose across the whole cultures
behavioral spectrum utilising cultural codex justified and authorised
enforcement conversion methodology to align adherents to the culture's own
attractors not Others. The existence of any number of so called ‘moderates’
determined as supporting Other cultures values systems makes no difference
within coercive strong network cultural systems as the Nazi and Islamic/Muslim
for the authority is in the hands of the altruistic enforcers as they always
are. Islamic/Muslim cultural divine vengeance and the blasphemous paradigms
threat and utilization of violence internal and external to the culture seeks
to and clearly achieves the ‘tranquility of silence‘ so prized by the Iranian
political/religious elite.
To determine as some have this is
'old' cultural codex and this is the twenty-first century and such attractors
are a pre-medieval, medieval and of a barbaric tribal form and are therefore
not the current belief system of adherents ignores the fact if this logic were
indeed the case each 'new' event for instance the view equal rights for women
is a 'good', a right without Man's 'leadership would have cultures immediately
changing precepts and beliefs underpinning them to change their whole cultures
normative value position, this clearly is not the case reality informs us
Fernand Braudel is right "old attitudes of thought and action, resistant frameworks
dying hard, at times against all logic." which in turn "limits the
possible" which are in essence the limits of a cultures behavioral
variance.
The 'limits of the possible' can
change for certain cultures ('rational' systems) but cannot for others the
reason being the degree to which the internal cultural codex enable the
relative independence of their adherents to challenge the certainty of the
cultural codex attractors being "authoritative for the present" (does
cultural codex exist to determine this is the case - which altruistic punishers
can utilise to justify and authorise their actions to align and enforce) - and
the degree with which a culture's methodology of control and the development
process imbues adherents with support of a blasphemy paradigm enforcing
protection of insidious codex constructs and the political elite of the culture
itself and even Other cultures failed cultural gatekeepers such as the ASIO
director-general Duncan Lewis and Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull
managing another cultures terror-genocide and insidious values systems into
humanities streets and calling it 'good'.
Even within Others dominant
cultural ethos and protection still as we see we have subjugation of women to
Man's leadership and historical barbaric tribal constructs which even include
the murder of Other, and women subject to cultural codex authorised sex slavery
because these are the actual codex attractors applying today as they still
exist within the cultural codex and to determine them as all medieval even
pre-medieval etc and deny cultural culpability would mean the underpinnings of
philosophical thought for women's rights today for instance pertaining to
Plato's ( 424/423 – 348/347 BC) view of enabling equal access to political
power for women was pre-medieval clearly from a tribal greek polis and not
applicable today. You cannot therefore utilise such an argument 'it is a value
older than...' then say it does not truly represent Muslim beliefs when clearly
such cultural attractors are analogised before us as they have alas
historically before others.
This I repeat is the truth which
underwrites the view “To make one exception means to make them all.” the reason
being as Francois Hartog points out some regimes ('rational' systems)
determined codex "was authoritative for the present" not a medieval past, it is happening right
now in this time therefore these are cultural values of the culture - own it.
Female
Genital Mutilation: Why Egyptian Girls Fear the Summer Women's Rights News
26/06/2015
Acid
is often used to attack women who transgress some imaginary line, from spurning
romantic advances to wearing a veil too loosely. Women's Rights News 23/07/2015
"Dua had only been working for
two months with the Khansaa Brigade, the all-female morality police....
Dua sat back down and watched as the
other officers took the women into a back room to be whipped. When they removed
their face-concealing niqabs, her friends were also found to be wearing makeup.
It was 20 lashes for the abaya offense, five for the makeup, and another five
for not being meek enough when detained.
Their cries began ringing out, and
Dua stared hard at the ceiling, a lump building in her throat."
New York Times, By AZADEH
MOAVENINOV. 21, 2015
"only been working for two
months" & "stared hard at the ceiling" so when
are you to be culpable and justice served against you for the terror you inform
after three months and the terror you enable by that silence? Importantly has your regret changed the
Islamic/Muslim cultural codex construct of women which informs the same from
generation to generation? You are a participant in atrocities against women and
still an adherent to the exact same cultural construct which informs infamy.
Explain to yourself how the
following is not linked ethically to the behavior against the female gender
above via the Muslim codex construct of women and why such a codex must remain
to inform such outcomes in our Public Square.
“The procedure has been practiced
for a long time. We need to check the quality [of the candidates] by checking
their virginity,” Inspector General Moechgiyarto, head of the National Police
law division"
Indonesia’s
crudely invasive ‘virginity tests’ for female military recruits By Sarah
Kaplan May 15 Washington Post
"The girls who were detained
were not like your daughter or mine," the general said ...
The general said the virginity
checks were done so that the women wouldn't later claim they had been raped by
Egyptian authorities.
"We didn't want them to say we
had sexually assaulted or raped them, so we wanted to prove that they weren't
virgins in the first place," the general said. "None of them were
(virgins)."
Egyptian
general admits 'virginity checks' conducted on protesters From Shahira
Amin, For CNN May 31, 2011
Amazing logic is enabled by such
constructs you can check virginity against women's will which is raping women,
because "we (you) wanted to prove that they weren't virgins in the first
place," then determine surprise "None of them were (virgins).".
Which makes the rapes by soldiers which did occur in the Tahrir Square square
along with other civilian men OK as well as the rapes in the prison medical
centres and why should we care because none of the women were virgins so
clearly possibly 'prostitutes'.
What are you supporting? This
behavior, this latitude of such proportion against women not only perpetrated
by Men but women as well against fellow women has to be analogised from a
cultural codex construct of women otherwise it would not occur. Who controls
women's sexuality under this cultural construct of Muslim veils and hijabs
women? What are you really wearing.
Do you really understand how
dangerous the following culturally derived statement is, not only for women but
humanity at large, that a cultural 'rational' model actually exists to enable
it to be said - "The girls who were detained were not like your daughter or
mine," the general said ... Can't you see where 'girls'
'daughter' can under such rational be replaced with 'neighbor', 'boys', 'son',
'mother', 'father', 'wife', 'Jews', 'Muslims', 'Christians', ....." just
as easily? And it ....
What are you supporting?
"Wan Zulaikha
Mohd Zakaria, 24, who recently attended a pre-marital course at a local mosque
in Kuala Lumpur, said she had been taught that sex was part a of wife’s
obligation to her husband.
“There is no such term as ‘rape’ in
marriage because it is wife’s duty and responsibility,” she told The Malaysian
Insider.
“A wife’s role is to serve her
husband in bed. But the husband must, of course, be understanding,” said Wan
Zulaikha.
She said it was considered a “sin”
for a wife to reject her husband’s advances, but there was no outright
condemnation by ulama for men who forced themselves on their wives"
NO
SUCH THING AS RAPE! A Muslim wife's duty is to serve her husband in BED
01 May 2015 Malaysia Chronicle
"A Pakistani man and his father
have been arrested in the country's latest so-called "honour killing"
after they set the son's wife alight for leaving the house without asking his
permission.
Siddique and his father then beat Ms
Bibi before dousing her with petrol and setting her on fire in central
Pakistan's Muzaffargarh district on Friday, Mr Azam said.
Ms Bibi had been married to Siddique
for three years, during which time she had suffered repeated domestic abuse for
the couple's inability to have children, Mr Azam said.
Suffering burns to 80 per cent of
her body, Ms Bibi died of her injuries in hospital on Saturday."
Somali woman killed for
not wearing veil, relatives say BBC 30 July 2014
"A Muslim teenage girl murdered
in an "honour killing" was the victim of a clash of cultures, police
said today.
Strict Kurdish Muslim Abdalla Yones
cut the throat of his 16-year-old daughter Heshu because he believed she had
become too westernised.
Yones, 48, a political refugee who
had fled the brutality of Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq 10 years ago.."
'Westernised'
girl killed by Muslim father Daily Mail Australia Tuesday, Apr 21st 2015
"Kuala Lumpur (AFP) -
Malaysia's government faced calls on Tuesday to take action against Muslim
protesters who pressured a church to remove its cross, the latest example of
rising Islamic intolerance that is fuelling religious tensions in the
multi-faith country."
Malaysia
urged to punish Muslims over 'cross' protest AFP April 21, 2015
"The suspects were allegedly
planning an attack that included targeting police at a ceremony marking ANZAC
Day, April 25"
5
arrested for Australia plot amid fear of homegrown ISIL terrorists by
Lauren Williams, Special for USA TODAY April 18, 2015
"“Should this be the word?” he
(Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan) asked his minister rhetorically. He
repeated the question to his audience as he opened the new wing and then
answered it declaring the word kampus would no longer be used and instead be
replaced with “kulliye”, derived from Arabic and during the Ottoman times
meaning a collection of buildings about a mosque.
“It would be a first in this new
period,” the president concluded."
Weeks
away from the ANZAC centenary, what does the rise of the ‘new Turkey’ mean for
Australia? news.com.au APRIL 04, 2015
Published April 23, 2015
FoxNews.com
“I saw this as part of my jihad for
Islam to help the Muslim ummah (community) in the area that I could, which was
the medical field,” he says with a distinctive Australian accent.
“When I got here, I was very happy
that I made the decision, and I was a little bit saddened at how long I’d
delayed it. I wish I had come a lot sooner.”‘Australian’
Islamist video deplored AAP APRIL 25, 2015
"The girl, whose name is
being withheld for her safety outside her village, sat about six feet away
and covered her face entirely with her veil so she would not have to see Mullah
Amin, who did not once look at her.........
Prominent mullahs and some officials
in Kunduz had earlier claimed the girl was actually as old as 17, above the age
of consent; .... But her mother says she is 10, and a forensic medical
examiner estimated her age at 10 to 11 years.
Mullah Amin’s two defense lawyers
pleaded on Islamic grounds that he should be given the Shariah law punishment
for a single person accused of adultery, 100 lashes, and then released. Judge
Rasuli responded that such logic would require him to order the girl to be
given 100 lashes as well. “She cannot commit adultery; she is a child,” he
said. “This is rape.” ......
After the girl was raped and
activists heard her family plotting to kill her, she was
put in a shelter run by Women for Afghan Women.."
Afghan
Mullah Who Raped Girl in His Mosque Receives 20-Year Prison Sentence By ROD
NORDLAND OCT. 25, 2014 The New York Times
This for a girl is what the
Islamic/Muslim construct of women can and is analogised to, this girl was
fortunate a vestige of Western legal process and justice had been incorporated
into Afghanistan justice system in 2009 and one wonders without pressure of the
West upon which the elite of Afghanistan is dependent whether or not such a law
would have been passed and with the Wests diminishing role in Afghanistan how
long it will remain.
"Legislation will allow men to
attack their wives, children and sisters without the fear of punishment
It will ban relatives of the accused
from bringing evidence against them
Law passed by parliament but is
waiting to be officially signed off by the president Hamid Karzai
Those who carry out honour killings
would be impossible to prosecute
Domestic abuse is still rife and
forced marriages are the norm"
Afghanistan
effectively legalises domestic violence with new law that bans anyone from
testifying against relatives By TARA BRADY PUBLISHED: 21:35 EST, 5 February
2014
You really believe surely the
Western construct of women is so obvious that in time the reality of women's
condition will improve even if you allow the cultural codex misogynistic
construct to remain in a Public Square?
"This is another clear
indication that the human rights situation in Afghanistan is getting worse not
better," Pillay said. "Respect for women's rights – and human rights
in general – is of paramount importance to Afghanistan's future security and
development. This law is a huge step in the wrong direction."
The new law denies Afghan Shi'a
women the right to leave their homes except for "legimitate"
purposes; forbids women from working or receiving education without their
husbands' express permission; explicitly permits marital rape; diminishes the
right of mothers to be their children's guardians in the event of a divorce;
and makes it impossible for wives to inherit houses and land from their
husbands – even though husbands may inherit immoveable property from their
wives.
"For a new law in 2009 to
target women in this way is extraordinary, reprehensible and reminiscent of the
decrees made by the Taliban regime in Afghanistan in the 1990s," Pillay
said."
UN human rights chief
says Afghan law restricting women's rights is reminiscent of Taliban era.
United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)
Saudi
Arabia: 'Western women who drive don't care if they're raped' claims Dr
Saleh Al-Saadoon By Dominic Gover, International Business Times, February 11,
2015
Teenager
weeps after ‘forced’ polygamous wedding Marc Bennetts Moscow 18 May 2015
By Other wearing Muslim symbols of
subjugation what are you moving inexorably to normalise as acceptable as being
derived from a culture which informs the above and below? Each single step
leads to where, Liberty and Equality particularly for women?
"By the time we went for our
second hajj, a year later, my mind was ready to surrender and my body was
desperate for invisibility. It felt as if everything was haram (prohibited) in
Saudi Arabia. I was descending into the first of several episodes of
depression; I felt I was losing my mind. I didn’t talk to anyone about how I
felt or get any help. I struck a deal with God: I’ll cover my hair if you save
my mind. I decided to wear the veil, and this time my parents accepted my
decision. I hid my body the way teenage girls, newly aware of male attention,
sometimes take refuge in baggy clothing. Still, the garments I wore did not
protect my body from wandering hands."
Journalist
Mona Eltahawy on misogyny in the Arab world MONA ELTAHAWY THE AUSTRALIAN
MAY 09, 2015
Forced
marriage of girl, 9, among 34 suspected cases being investigated by Australian
Federal Police SHELLEY HADFIELD HERALD SUN MAY 17, 2015
"The Melbourne (Australia)
school allegedly threatened to send home children who missed morning prayer and
Koran recital, while the Perth (Australian) school allegedly forced Year 1
girls to wear a headscarf."
Probe
of hardline Muslim schools by Leo Shanahan THE AUSTRALIAN JUNE 02
It "is
about more than cloths." Oh how very true.
Julie Bishop
on why Fashion Week is about more than just clothes. The Hon Julie Bishop
MP (Australian Foreign Minister) MAMAMIA
"Julie Bishop laughs off
criticism about her decision to wear a headscarf in Iran."
“When I went for an audience with
the Pope, they told me I had to wear a scarf,” the Foreign Minister said. “So I
wore a scarf.
“You respect the culture wherever
you are.”
"When
in Rome … Julie Bishop heads off scarf stir" BRENDAN NICHOLSON,
TEHRAN THE AUSTRALIAN APRIL 20, 2015
"When two lifeguards tried to
help the drowning 20-year-old, her father "started pulling and preventing
the rescue men and got violent with them", it reported.
"He told them that he
prefers his daughter being dead than being touched by a strange man,"
said Lieutenant Colonel Ahmed Burqibah, deputy director of Dubai police's
search and rescue department."
Woman
drowns in Dubai after father blocks rescue to save 'honour' AFP August 11,
2015, 6:18 am
NYT Written by RUKMINI CALLIMACHI;
Photographs by MAURICIO LIMA AUG. 13, 2015
The claim if you care to check in
the Quran can be verified given you pick it up and read it otherwise you can
persist in determining not such Islamic/Muslim construct exists for you have
never seen it yourself - ethics what are they?
You are therefore by your support
of such a cultural codex which contains such constructs as an inherent part of
it construct of women, this time Other women, enable what to occur?
The Islamic/Muslim construct of
women enables what to occur - the veil a symbolic cultural artifact proclaiming
adherence to a ethical construct which enables the "drowning
20-year-old" to be left to die. What are you supporting?"..stalking
the streets of Isfahan, throwing acid into women's faces ...
The attacks - there have been at
least four in the busy city in central Iran in recent weeks - appear aimed at
terrorising women who dare to test the boundaries of the Islamic dress code.
The crimes coincided with the
passage of a new parliamentary bill that allows private citizens to enforce
"morality" laws."
Acid
attacks in Iran sharpen row over Islamic dress and vigilantism Reuters BY
BABAK DEHGHANPISHEH BEIRUT Wed Nov 5, 2014 10:24am
Julie Bishop, being generous you
appear to have forgotten “To make one exception means to make them all.” Blaming
the Victim: Charlie Hebdo and Free Speech By Nicole Gelinas, January 18,
2015 New York Post
"He beat the girls and took
them to Egypt to find husbands when Amina was 15 and picked one man who was
almost 50."
Two
girls murdered in taxi were 'honour killings' Yahoo7 News June 19, 2015
Clothing such as the Muslim
headscarf, hijab, burqa... is a political cultural statement and informs
adherence and respect for the ideological constructs attached to it which hold
analogised tragic consequences for women.
The same cloth/garment scarf worn
under different cultural 'rational' models may not link to the same tragic
political outcomes. Just because it is just a fashion statement under your 'rational'
model does not mean you can utilise this as an excuse to display support for
what in fact is a construct of the most heinous crime against women that of
being determined subject to Mans 'Leadership' and control of women's sexuality.
In the case of "Rome"
such a demand to wear a headscarf is not attached to Man and therefore is a
misogynistic construct to inform women being subject to Man as no God wrote
these religious texts. A headscarf under the cultural 'rational' models of
'Rome' and the Islamic/Muslim culture is a symbol of women's oppression not
freedom, not fashion sense nor choice. You in fact had a cultural given right
hard fought for to choose and you threw it away to support exactly the opposite
construct for your own gender - congratulations.
For what it's worth @JulieBishopMP I thought
your headscarf v. appropriate and attractive. ( Nice touch with the sparkles
too.)
There is no cultural norm Julie
Bishop and other women like her such as Wendy Harmer would not stoop to to show
respect for and in doing so support continuing constructs of oppression against
women and Other such symbols represent? 'Sparkles'? Those subject to the acid
attacks must be reflecting "If only I wore 'sparkles' and had my veil
only half way on my head I would have been safe from Islamic/Muslim cultural
derived acid attacks."
When a culture insists upon an
iniquitous construct to be observed what do you believe will be the required
nature of the method utilised to enforce such an arrangement?
You both have shown what 'respect'
what support for these Muslim women, not only in Iran but elsewhere, subject to
such cultural attacks and restrictions? Both your actions are "appropriate"?
What the article detailing the 'Acid
attacks in Iran' against woman underlines is the reason why I am writing
this blog it is that you cannot show 'respect' which is in fact cultural
support for a political cultural symbol such as the veil, hijab, burqa, etc
without showing 'respect' support for what such political constructs are
directly linked to - such as the capacity of the Islamic/Muslim cultural
politic to inform the following: "..a new (Iranian)
parliamentary bill that allows private citizens to enforce "morality"
laws.".
Julie Bishop and Wendy Harmer who I
ask are going to be the victims of such "morality" laws? This is
what you are supporting for the veil ties in directly to the Islamic/Muslim
cultural view women sexuality is problematic and demands control and suppression
the veil is an integral symbol as well as method of 'hiding' controlling Muslim
women's sexuality.
Julie Bishop I am not glad you can
laugh about reinforcing women as subject be it under a Christian or Islamic
construct. Particularly wearing a headscarf in an Islamic context where in the
same space women are being harassed for not doing so and worse not only in Iran
but elsewhere where even in Australia it is demanded of non-Muslim/Muslim women
in teaching roles in Western Australia to wear the hijab or be sacked.
"TWO female teachers from the
Islamic College of South Australia have gone to court to fight against being
unfairly dismissed based, in part, on their attire being considered
inappropriate.
The teachers were sacked last year
by the West Croydon school, which issued a warning to all female teachers -
Muslim and non-Muslim - to wear a hijab head scarf or face the sack."
Furious debate as teachers at
Islamic College of SA's West Croydon campus ordered to wear hijab or face sack
INVESTIGATIONS EDITOR BRYAN LITTLELY ADELAIDENOW FEBRUARY 13, 2013
Free to choose really? You had a
choice in 'Rome' and in Iran not available to most via cultural conditioning
and what did you do with it?
What are you supporting for you
cannot pick from a cultural construct what you determine as the less benign and
not understand it is linked inexorably to the rest. By supporting such a
construct how much longer do you think you are contributing to womens
continuing subjugation? 1 minute, 10 hours years whatever it is it is a good
laugh don't you think?
"Girls at Al-Taqwa College
(Space-Victoria, Australia Time-2015) have been banned from running at sporting
events because the principal believes it may cause them to lose their
virginity, former teachers claim."
Girls
at Islamic school banned from running, teachers claim by Henrietta Cook,
The Age, April 23, 2015
Iran:
Deteriorating Conditions for Religious Freedom March 18, 2015 | U.S.
Commission on International Religious Freedom USCIRF
Such a small thing a scarf. What is
all the fuss?
The girl above in the image on the
right is wearing a headscarf/hijab, under the same construct which informs the
headscarfs/hijabs existence in context what else is occurring in the same space
and can and is analogised from the exact same Islamic construct of women as it
has to for both to exist in the same space?
Tell us Ms Bishop how the
'rational' regards Islamic/Muslim cultural codex construct of womens sexuality
cannot be analogised for both behaviors and why they therefore cannot be
linked?
By your actions Ms Bishop you have
shown yourself to be supporting what construct of women?
I perceive you Ms Bishop are in
dubious company for what else does such a construct enable to be analogised
into reality:
What else other than the Muslim
headscarf, hajib, burqa, ... does such an Islamic/Muslim cultural codex
construct of women enable to be analogised into reality:
"Turkey. Last year, The New
York Times reported that President Recep Tayyip Erdogan declared contraception
advocates as treasonous and blamed them for stifling the country’s growth.
Erdogan had previously compared abortion to murder, according to BBC."
Iran's
Ban On Contraceptives, Abortions & Vasectomies Would Set Women's Rights
Further Back KIRSTEN O'REGAN, Bustle 12-3-2015
"Under Sharia, a woman’s
guardian – who could be her father, uncle or brother – and two witnesses must
approve her marriage. When they refuse, women are increasingly turning to legal
action....
Once the court approved of the
suitor, the President of the country becomes the woman’s official guardian, and
the judge would act on his behalf and allow her to marry."
Thwarted
brides turn to the courts in UAE Ayesha Al Khoori and Haneen Dajani
March 16, 2015
British
Girls Raped by Muslim Gangs on "Industrial Scale" by Soeren
Kern March 17, 2015 at 5:00 am
"For 42 years, Sisa Abu Daooh
has been dressing as a man to escape restrictions on women’s employment and
earn enough to support her daughter. "
Egyptian
Woman Reveals 42-Year Secret of Survival: Pretending to Be a Man By JARED
MALSIN NYT MARCH 25, 2015
"Others echoed good examples of
madrasas (religious school or college for the study of the Islamic
religion) in their areas, but there was widespread awareness of others that
promoted a narrow and intolerant understanding of Islam. Some women wished
for more “self-regulation”, but were pessimistic about this happening,
believing instead that state regulation may be necessary. ....
..a void in strong credible
Muslim leadership – among both civil leaders and theologians. In recent years
we have become too familiar with preachers who promote extremist views while
pretending to be speaking on behalf of “normative” Islam. ...
Another key barrier, identified by
women in particular and not often appreciated, is fear. Fear of challenging
extremists and the possible repercussions. Having witnessed the insults other
Muslim women have been subjected to in challenging extremism, many feared
mudslinging, intimidation and abuse.
This is often instigated by men in
an attempt to silence women’s voices. I saw this first hand when
attempts were made to scupper the workshops we were organising by publicly
smearing me and other women who simply wanted to safeguard their children.
These women know that challenging extremism also means standing up to
patriarchy and traditional gender roles that have stifled the contribution of
women in both home and public life."
British
Muslim girls and extremism: what I learned on my journey across the UK by
Sara Khan, theguardian, Sunday 29 March 2015
The following are facts they are
not made up to simply cast inappropriate aspersions as to the propensity of one
culture over another to commit rape but simply as the British Serious Crimes
Report states the connection between Muslim organised groups is so obviously
manifest it requires investigation and states "It cannot be parked as
too potentially sensitive or inflammatory to pursue openly at that level (at a
national level).".
Clearly Muslims are going to have
to face the fact such a finding indicates a cultural propensity, this has to be
derived from a Islamic cultural construct which enables such atrocious behavior
to be analogised into reality, for if this was not the case such abuse would be
committed by non-Muslim cultures in the same proportion to the Muslim culture.
This is clearly not happening as
the Serious Crime Report clearly states and by making such a finding determines
the Muslim culture needs to be investigated as to why despite any possible
'provocation; resulting from such research. This is how serious the British
Serious Crimes Report view is there is a more than likely link.
"..as has been found wherever
this type of organised group abuse has been uncovered, the perpetrators have
been mainly from an Asian heritage, with some from Africa or south east
European countries, and with a mainly Muslim culture. This has continued with
the Thames Valley cases post-Bullfinch, and in the very recent convictions in
Bristol.
This Serious Case Review, in one
county, is not the place to attempt a definitive analysis of why this is, and
this needs to be researched and understood at a national level given both its
importance and the sensitivities of any conclusions. It cannot be parked as too
potentially sensitive or inflammatory to pursue openly at that level."
Serious
Case Review into Child Sexual Exploitation in Oxfordshire: from the experiences
of Children A, B, C, D, E, and F Approved by the OSCB February 26th 2015
Why has such abuse of young girls
occurred, by in the main by organised groups of Muslim men, below is my opinion
why combined with the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex construct of Other.
The Muslim Mans derived notion of
the construct of women's 'purity' based upon Muslim Mans derived notion woman's
sexuality is 'problematic' so that Muslim Man can and does control a Muslim
women’s sexuality for satisfying the Muslim Man the Islamic codex therefore
enables the analogized behavior of Female Genital Mutilation to achieve this
state of 'purity'.
Why because under the Islamic codex
female sexuality does not matter, female sexuality under an Islamic construct
needs to be controlled, whereas under the Islamic construct Male sexuality
needs to be satisfied.
Cultural codex words and exemplar
(messianic) behavior create reality via the analogies which can be derived from
a cultural classification of women. Have you read the Islamic words have you
studied the exemplar behavior towards women? Yourself?
Muslim female genital mutilation
exists it therefore has to have a cultural codex connection otherwise the
behavior would not exist. You are a cultural adherent to a codex containing a genocide and
misogynistic construct you are a member of the cultural behavioral variance
such a construct informs, you are culpable for what your culture informs within
your cultural behavioral variance as you adhere to the same construct of women
which informs ‘purity’ which in turn informs female genital mutilation. Which
is only one of the terrible outcomes these Islamic constructs of women inform
as we know only too well.
I am bigoted, prejudiced hateful of
and against the Islamic codex which not only enables such oppression of women
by allowing it to fester in our Public Squares but the method of Islamic
cultural enforcement of 'provoked' violence and the construct of Other which
enables Other to be burned alive in cages.
Islamic words and exemplar behavior
enable the analogies based upon the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex to inform
reality, the Muslim behavioral variance, this is why this aborent codex must be
removed from the Public Square. No victim should be the price of a cultures entrance
to the Public Square not that 'most' do not participate therefore it is OK, for
it requires the 'most' to exist for the 'few' to exist to cause such tragedy
you cannot have one without the other for the 'few' are derived directly from
the 'most' because they adhere to the same source codex. The fact that the
'most' of any culture do not participate is not unusual and is absolutely no
excuse for allowing terror and oppression of women in our societies.
The perceived “obsessive
preoccupation with the hijab” by Western Other by pretend Muslim
feminists which prevents pretend Muslim feminists realising they cannot be
feminists under a Western derived definition and the fact the ‘hijab’ is
determined as an oppressive construct as it is not disconnected to the exact
same Islamic/Muslim value construct of women which enable genital mutilation
and that Muslim women should be satisfied with “four walls”.
“The conversation took a turn for
the worse when they told me that my ideas were un-Islamic and that Islam grants
women full dignity ‘within the four walls of her home’.” Women’s
MidEasts Posts 2013
Women
Defy Imam to Carry Murdered Woman’s Coffin February 16, 2015
"In a clash between Western
ideals and Afghan realities, an effort to elevate the status of women by
recruiting them to the police force has often backfired."
Afghan
Policewomen Struggle Against Culture By ALISSA J. RUBIN NTY MARCH 1, 2015
What are you defending, what are
you promoting by allowing into your space without restriction to be able to
frame behavior via cultural institutions family, community, Mosque a cultural
codex which can be clearly proven to be able to be analogised to inform such
reality? Is just one victim worth the price, just because it is not you.
Feminist Discourse Analysis in
Islamic Feminism - Islamic Feminism=Free Slave
Muhammad Salman, Dr. Arab Naz,
Waseem Khan, Umar Daraz, Qaiser Khan - Utilising the ‘few’ to prove the many can
also be applied in reverse. As researchers your task under a Western research
paradigm is to prove the negative so as not to arrive at the inevitable you are
‘right’. Your utilisation of the Islamic/Religious ‘Duty to Certainty’ rather
than ‘Duty to Doubt’ is manifest.
By Muhammad Salman, Dr. Arab Naz,
Waseem Khan, Umar Daraz, Qaiser Khan & Muhammad Hussain - University of
Malakand, Pakistan
Western Feminist definition: "Those who
dare to break the conspiracy of silence about the oppressive, unequal
relationship between men and women, and who want to change it (Turtle 1987:
107- 8)."
Islamic Feminist definition: Those who
dare not break the conspiracy of silence about the oppressive, unequal
relationship between men and women, and who do not want to change it and
determine any criticism of the Islamic/Muslim construct of women is an Other
plot.(Muhammad Salman, Dr. Arab Naz, Waseem Khan, Umar Daraz, Qaiser Khan 2013)
Muslims and others utilise women
who participated in ‘business’, ‘war’, ‘experts’ in Islamic codex as proof
Islam enables women to realise their full potential, contemporary examples
would be Muslim
female leaders are "former prime minister of Pakistan Benazir
Bhutto (served 1988-1990 and 1993-1996), Indonesian President Megawati
Sukarnoputri (elected 2001), former Turkish Prime Minister Tansu Ciller (served
1993-1995) and the Bangladeshi Prime Ministers Begum Khaleda Zia (first elected
in 1991) and Sheikh Hasina Wajed (first elected in 1996)."
“If we examine the history of Islam
we will find the strong position of women in social life for example Khadija
(the first wife of the holy Profit PBUH) was a business women. His wife Ayesha
was well known and respected as an expert in Hadeeth (in the top ranking
interpreters of Hadeeth) and participated in wars also (Saadawi, 1980).”
There is no doubt certain ‘strong’
Muslim women achieved/achieve positions of leadership but does this enable
given the Islamic construct of women and what we see as reality for the
majority from a modern Western feminist definition of maximised relative
independence, the view expressed “we will find the strong position in social
life” (in Islamic/Muslim culture) exists” for the majority of Muslim women.
Even if the majority may be found to enjoy such privilege of agency what of
just one Muslim women that does not because of the Islamic/Muslin construct of
women?
There will, because of the nature
of context (elite family connection/ specific opportunity) and/or ability the
propensity for ‘even’ women to rise within a misogynistic paradigm. There is no
lack of proof of this from various cultural constructs. But does this evidence
of the ‘few’ then enable the many to have in reality such agency and also
importantly does this also mean the ‘few’ were/are not themselves bound by the
very real Islamic cultural construct of women which would apply to their social
circumstance? Were all allowed to carry out their roles without any prejudice,
the threat of elimination or actual elimination, prejudice known to be justified
and authorised by Islamic/Muslim cultural “artifacts, rituals and text
to develop and reinforce a shared sense of identity among members. It is the
filter through which we see and understand our current reality (Edgar, 1980)”.
None? For the mere existence of
just one Muslim women whose circumstance is opposed to your view of the liberal
(Western definition) nature of Muslims women's existence would determine your
conclusions false or at the very least suspect. For such circumstance has to be
informed by a cultural codex construct, individuals simply do not define their
own context, unless you can clearly show this other non-liberal Muslim women
circumstance as being completely disconnected from the Islamic/Muslim cultural
codex you cannot exclude this women from the Islamic/Muslim cultural behavioral
variance. Believing the non-liberal condition is not connected is not enough
under a 'Duty to Doubt' research paradigm you have to actually provide reliable
valid evidence.
The Islamic 'Freedom to Choose"
for Muslim women - "remain silent and wait to be killed" or "speak up
and then be killed".
"I had two options. One was to
remain silent and wait to be killed. And the second was to speak up and then be
killed. I chose the second one. I decided to speak up," Malala said.
Malala's Moment: Nobel Winner
Speaks Out OSLO, Norway — Dec 10, 2014, 5:03 PM ET By DANICA KIRKA Associated
Press
"Editors of the religious
information website Shiaonline.com have had enough... and they're making sure
people know. The object of their anger: Iranian women who nonchalantly let
their hijabs hang loosely from the back of their heads. Or worse still, those
who don't even make an effort to cover up tight-fitting clothes."
Iranian
website goes on strike over country's loose hijabs 04/02/2015 / IRAN
“It is always preferable for a woman
to remain hidden and veiled, to maintain society from behind this veil,” the
manifesto says.
ISIS’
all-female militia publishes strict manifesto for girls By Yaron Steinbuch
February 5, 2015 | 1:17pm
"QUEBEC CITY - There will be no
bail for a Quebec City man who is accused of threatening to burn his wife’s
face and genitals with acid, forcing her to have sex and citing the Koran to
justify beating their children."
"Bail
denied for man accused of threatening to burn wife's genitals, rape"
KATHLEEN FRENETTE, QMI AGENCY Feb 6, 2015
This is 2015 not the seventh
century, what I ask would have been the recourse for this women and her
children if she did not exist in Others ethical space? If this women and her
children existed in an Islamic dominated political space would there be
'justice' or have they already under an Islamic rational model already received
it?
No Pressure? No compulsion? No
Islamic cultural codex able to be utilised to justify and authorise such
behavior? You take the ‘few’ to prove a point I take the ‘few’ to prove a point
–which construct translates to affecting the many, even possibly to your own
‘few’ - Assassination
of Benazir Bhutto.
The law of large numbers would
indicate anything is possible, but is it not what the median, average, at least
from the first quartile to the end of the liberal-moderate-radical-extremist
behavioural variance really the true measure of a cultures capacity to inform
the maximum relative independence of women to men, under a feminist measure of
equality in power (equal access to resources, self-determination and inherent
cultural hierarchical position across all institutions, family, community,
political)? Are the ‘few represented as proof actually indicative of the whole
and even their own existence devoid of the effect of the Islamic/Muslim
cultural construct of women being subject to Muslim mans ‘leadership’? No
evidence whatsoever to the contrary?
This does not only apply to the
Islamic context but also exists within the Christian Western derived context as
well. Everything is relative and that relativity is defined by definitions
which define the boundaries.
Given the above can the following
really be true? Changing definitions of feminism to an Islamic version may
certainly save your conscience but it will not save the Muslim women many.
“This suggests that Islam is not
oppressive in the sense it is projected rather Islam presented a very liberal
view and provide a new direction. The oppression of women in Islam is
conspiracy and the oppression of women is a one sided view based upon false
notions. Even, some of the critics of Islam with their westerners’ counterparts
regard Islam as a hurdle in feminist efforts. There may be two reasons for
criticizing Islam. The first is they do not know the real Islamic essence,
ideology and teaching of Islam, about women rights and duties while secondly
they are criticizing Islam in order to cover their deficiencies and inner
enmity. This is not the case with the white feminists only as most of the
ignorant Muslims believed that Islam and feminism are mutually exclusive.”
This is the reality:
Just one of the diametrically
opposed values causing Muslim terror against Other is the construct of woman's
place in society, i.e. being subject to mans 'leadership' and women's sexuality
perceived as problematic and subject to Muslim mans sexual demand.
What is clearly not appreciated is
the Islamic categorisation of women as subject particularly determining
sexuality of women being problematic under an Islamic construct and being mere
vessels of Muslim mans sexual satisfaction, I believe through Dyadic Data
Analysis, the connection and force of the Islamic words-idea of women, if
someone cares to take the time, would clearly show leads irrevocably to
analogous interpretation in reality from genital mutilation, confinement to
space, enforcement via violence, restrictions on control and means of movement
inclusive of driving cars, to the burka, hijab (game to try this Mr. Umar Daraz
- your relative willingness to even mention you may be testing such an
hypothesis is a measure of what Mr. Umar Daraz).
All these I believe will be shown
to be connected to the oppressive Islamic construct of women so accepting one
construct as a 'good' such as the burka, hijab you are accepting the same
Islamic values which drive the other outcomes for women not just Muslim women.
One should take particular note of Nicole Gelinas comment below.
“To make one exception means to make
them all.”
Blaming
the Victim: Charlie Hebdo and Free Speech By Nicole Gelinas, January
18, 2015 New York Post
Such social constructs will be
applied to Other when political space is controlled by the Islamic/Muslim
construct. Why? It is the same reason Islamic/Muslim terror exists because in
my view the cognitive dissonance generated from the underlying values between
the Western and Islamic construct of women are reflected in space, one informs
relative freedom agency the other relative subjugation absence of agency
equilibrium will be sought where attention cannot be overtly drawn to the
iniquitous nature of the construct - it is anything other than 'free' as the
underlying construct which informs each outcome are based on oppressive
constructs.
It therefore should be no surprise
the following occurs and the insidious construct of women are to blame regards
attacks upon their person remains.
"TWO female teachers from the
Islamic College of South Australia have gone to court to fight against being
unfairly dismissed based, in part, on their attire being considered
inappropriate.
The teachers were sacked last year
by the West Croydon school, which issued a warning to all female teachers -
Muslim and non-Muslim - to wear a hijab head scarf or face the sack."
Furious
debate as teachers at Islamic College of SA's West Croydon campus ordered to
wear hijab or face sack INVESTIGATIONS EDITOR BRYAN
LITTLELY ADELAIDENOW FEBRUARY 13, 2013
And we thought Peters biblical
codex construct of women which is in essence almost exactly the same as the
Islamic/Muslim cultural codex construct was behind us in this 'modern' world.
The codex remains the behavior remains.
"Kevin Mack sparked outrage
when he said that when women walk alone, "that in itself is an invitation
for someone to take advantage of you"."Albury
Mayor Kevin Mack sorry for 'victim blaming' rape comments on women walking
alone ABC 1-5-2015
Responses from women to Albury
Mayor Kevin Mack are worth noting for they put the onus and codex method which
should be followed by Man because of Mans failings not women.
Man needs to be chaperoned by
'responsible' Men minders not the other way round. Any codex claimed to be
written by an all knowing God surely would reflect the reality of Mans
duplicity and violence against women and therefore included protection for
women rather than blame. It should therefore be of no surprise such codex
constructs of women are written by Man for Man.
"Please stop telling women that
they are not free to walk in public unmolested. Instead, please tell men to not
rape," one woman wrote to Cr Mack on his Facebook page.
"Why don't you ask rapists
and attackers to walk with other men who aren't violent to get them not to
attack women? Start with the men who do this, not blame women for men's
disgusting actions," another woman wrote."
Albury rape investigation finalised
after police halt search for three men by Rachel Browne SMH May 1, 2015
Sounds like a good policy option
for the security of women from x violent husbands/partners or otherwise only to
be allowed out with a male chaperone.
What a good idea why didn't God
think of that?
'Complete
Proof' within the Islamic behavioral variance 'spectrum' women being 'free' to
choose their own clothing style is a lie and why.
It is not that Islamic/Muslim
culture is alone in the subjugation of women to the 'cupidity of man' but does
this give you the right to have continue practices and therefore the codex and
connected development-education creating generation after generation
perpetrators and victims to inform the same when you can stand and say ‘No
more!’.
“‘The persistence of such an inhuman
practice for more than 2000 years only demonstrates how religious superstitions
can deaden absolutely all rational instincts and human feelings even among a
highly civilised people. The idea behind the practice of Sati would be clear
from the following passage in Colerbook’s Digest of the Hindu Law, an
authoritative manual of Hindu law prepared by the government with the help of
learned Brahmins. ‘No other effectual duty is known for virtuous women at any
time after the deaths of the Lord’s, except casting themselves into the same
fire’. The failure of the widow to do this duty might lead to her rebirth as
animals, while its faithful observance, would not only enable her to enjoy
delight with her husband for eternity but also expiate the sins of her
husband’s maternal and paternal ancestors up to three generations.
The cupidity of man was given
sanction of religion even after death and for his satisfaction his wife should
follow him to the next world.”
The Move For The Abolition Of Sati,
Raja Ram Mohun Roy And Indian Awakening, M. C. Kotnala, 1975, p. 49
The question should be, if you have
comprehended sufficient of the argument above, 'What are the Hindu constructs
of women which have meant the question needed to be asked at all?'.
“When Caesar shakes hands with
Peter, human blood oozes from the grasp.” February 24, 1530 reflection of an
observer of Pope Clement VIII and Charles V King of France passing down the
aisle hand in hand after the Pope anointed and crowned Charles V Emperor of the
Holy Roman Empire.
So it is with the joining of the
hands of Putin (Caesar) and the Russian Orthodox Church (Peter).
The ethics of the God
(unchallengeable) given right of Imperial domination resumes on Russian soil
with actions we have seen inevitably follow, along with the return of the
religious right of man to provide 'Leadership' to women. What do you think is
going to happen?
I for one have come to the
conclusion Freedom of Religion is not delivering on its promise of transcendent
peace and harmony, there appears to be an uncanny connection of clearly
identifiable religious codex constructs, in reality, in the earthly domain
informing completely the opposite. Time for a rethink.
""This bill would
establish violence as a norm of conduct," Communist lawmaker Yuri
Sinelshchikov said during the debate.
Women's rights lawyer Mari Davtyan
told The Moscow Times the legislative moves are dangerous and "send a
message that the state doesn't consider familial battery fundamentally wrong
anymore."
A survey this month by state-run
pollster VTsIOM found 19 per cent of Russians said "it can be
acceptable" to hit one's wife, husband or child "in certain
circumstances," the Associated Press reported.
In many ways, this reflects the
thrust of an old Russian proverb: "If he beats you it means he loves
you."
According to Russian government statistics
from the Interior Ministry, 40 per cent of all violent crimes are committed
within the family. The figures correlate to 36,000 women being beaten by their
partners every day and 26,000 children being assaulted by their parents every
year."
Russian
parliament votes 380-3 to decriminalise domestic violence, SMH, Doug
Stanglin, JANUARY 29 2017 - 10:26AM
As the secular State and supporting
elites Left or Right joins, for political self-interest or sociological
imagined delusions with the Religious and defends the religious right to
practice their faith-ideology without impediment, blood will flow, terror and
tragic misogyny and their inevitable fellow traveler blasphemy will be
established "as a norm of conduct".
Particular clothing sends political/social signals of adherence to a particular culture ideology. Given research determines majority Muslims countries tend to inform significantly more violence than Other, oppression of Other=inequality of power, subjugation of women to Men's leadership and terror-genocide against Other and even against fellow Muslims, Fox News host Jeanine Pirro determination the hijab is an indicator of a person who adheres to a culture ideology which is ":antithetical to the United States Constitution" has to be Truth.
John Solomon and Sara Carter joined Judge Jeanine Pirro to talk Ilhan Omar, Adam Schiff, and more of the chaos in Washington --take a look:
If a culture ideology systemically informs violence, terror, genocide and diminished political power of select citizen groups then if you wear a symbol of adherence to such a culture ideology be it a brownshirt or a hijab then you will be rightly singled out for condemnation and adherence to evil constructs delivering the same to humanities streets.
The reason Ilhan Omar can be labeled as a deviant when utilising the American Constitution as a ruler is because the Islam Islamist Dichotomy paradigm utilised by the Democrats is a fraudulent lie because if you have evil (terror-genocide) constantly walking from the 'good' and 'moderate' biology/culture ideology codex development floors across time and space, the 'good' and the 'moderate' are responsible for the subsequent evil. Would anyone claim now although they have in the past there are ‘good’ ‘moderate’ and extremist Nazis – No we do not because such a Culture Ideology systemically informs terror-genocide as evidence clearly proves even in current times the Muslim culture ideology systemically the same.
The reasoning why it is impossible for the Islam Islamist dichotomy paradigm utilized by the Democrats to excuse Ilhan Omar as an adherent of a Biology/Culture Ideology informing terror-genocide and oppression of Other is simply commonsense "Relationism".
"Relationism is a metatheory that incorporates contextualism and organicism to approach scientific problems from four major principles (Overton, 2010).
First, the holism principle indicates that the meaning and significance of any given phenomenon depends on the relational context in which it is embedded (Overton, 2010). In the cases of culture and biology, holism invites us to acknowledge that even if we focus on just one component of each system – a single gene, a single cultural trait – we also need to recognize that these units must be contextualized because they operate as part of systems that function as wholes (e.g., genome, brain, cultural self, organism, community, population).
Second, the identity of opposites principle “establishes the identity among parts of a whole by casting them not as exclusive contradictions as in the split epistemology but as differentiated polarities (i.e., coequals) of a unified (i.e., indissociable), inclusive matrix – as a relation” (Overton, 2010, p. 14, emphasis in original). According to this principle, culture is biology and biology is culture: they are coequal and inseparable. Both are part of the matrix of evolution, adaptation, and transformation. Culture and biology are constantly engaged in a co-constructing feedback loop, in a reciprocal codetermination (Overton & Reese, 1973), that we are only beginning to understand. “The fact that a behavior implicates activity of the biological system does not imply that it does not implicate activity of the cultural system, and the fact that the behavior implicates activity of the cultural system does not imply that it does not implicate activity of the biological system. In other words, the identity of opposites establishes the metatheoretical rationale for the theoretical position that biology and culture (like culture and person, biology and person, etc.) operate in a truly interpenetrating manner” (Overton, 2010, p. 15, emphasis in original).
Third, the opposites of identity principle aims at establishing a bedrock for inquiry by moving to a second moment of analysis – after the identity of opposites – in which the law of contradiction is restated and categories again exclude each other (Overton, 2010). Hence, next we should consider that culture is not biology, as each system is given a unique identity that differentiates it. This principle provides a platform in which these new opposites – culture and biology – become standpoints, points of view, lines of sight (Latour, 1993), or levels of analysis (Overton, 2010). “Although explicitly recognizing that any behavior is 100% biology and 100% culture, alternative points-of-view permit the scientist to analyze the behavior from a biological or from a cultural standpoint. Biology and culture no longer constitute competing alternative explanations; rather, they are two points-of-view on an object of inquiry that has been created by and will be fully understood only through multiple viewpoints” (Overton, 2010, pp. 15–16).
Finally, the synthesis of wholes principle functions as a third moment of analysis in the dialectical undertaking of relational epistemology, as it proposes a resolution to the bipolar tension of the opposites of identity by moving away from this conflict to formulate a new system that integrates the two poles (Overton, 2010). For instance, the person can function as a supra-ordinate system that coordinates, synthesizes, and resolves the tension between culture and biology by regulating and organizing them within the self (Magnusson & Stattin, 1998). In this synthesis, a standpoint provides a stable base for future research (Overton, 2010). From the person standpoint we can examine how the relation between culture and biology shapes individual differences in development. From the biology standpoint, we can investigate the relation between culture and the person by focusing on correlates of brain functioning. From the cultural standpoint, we can inquire into the relation between person and biology by centering on cultural variation in a given domain. In sum, Overton's (2010) relational epistemology provides a invaluable set of guiding principles for the study of culture and biology." (Causadias 8-9)
Causadias, Jose M., Eva Telzer, Nancy Gonzales. The Handbook of Culture and Biology. Wiley-Blackwell, 2017-08-30.
Jeanine Pirro has determined, and rightly so a truth, a relationship between, the hijab symbol of adherence to a core sacred codex for designating Muslim behavior which “establishes the identity among parts of a whole by casting them not as exclusive contradictions as in the split epistemology but as differentiated polarities (i.e., coequals) of a unified (i.e., indissociable), inclusive matrix – as a relation” consistently informing violence, oppression and terror-genocide. Ilhan Omar by wearing such a symbol of adherence to such a codex of coequals of a unified inclusive matrix informing evil is ":antithetical to the United States Constitution" regards its core tenets liberty, equality and fraternity.
Particular clothing sends political/social signals of adherence to a particular culture ideology. Given research determines majority Muslims countries tend to inform significantly more violence than Other, oppression of Other=inequality of power, subjugation of women to Men's leadership and terror-genocide against Other and even against fellow Muslims, Fox News host Jeanine Pirro determination the hijab is an indicator of a person who adheres to a culture ideology which is ":antithetical to the United States Constitution" has to be Truth.
John Solomon and Sara Carter joined Judge Jeanine Pirro to talk Ilhan Omar, Adam Schiff, and more of the chaos in Washington --take a look:
If a culture ideology systemically informs violence, terror, genocide and diminished political power of select citizen groups then if you wear a symbol of adherence to such a culture ideology be it a brownshirt or a hijab then you will be rightly singled out for condemnation and adherence to evil constructs delivering the same to humanities streets.
The reason Ilhan Omar can be labeled as a deviant when utilising the American Constitution as a ruler is because the Islam Islamist Dichotomy paradigm utilised by the Democrats is a fraudulent lie because if you have evil (terror-genocide) constantly walking from the 'good' and 'moderate' biology/culture ideology codex development floors across time and space, the 'good' and the 'moderate' are responsible for the subsequent evil. Would anyone claim now although they have in the past there are ‘good’ ‘moderate’ and extremist Nazis – No we do not because such a Culture Ideology systemically informs terror-genocide as evidence clearly proves even in current times the Muslim culture ideology systemically the same.
The reasoning why it is impossible for the Islam Islamist dichotomy paradigm utilized by the Democrats to excuse Ilhan Omar as an adherent of a Biology/Culture Ideology informing terror-genocide and oppression of Other is simply commonsense "Relationism".
"Relationism is a metatheory that incorporates contextualism and organicism to approach scientific problems from four major principles (Overton, 2010).
First, the holism principle indicates that the meaning and significance of any given phenomenon depends on the relational context in which it is embedded (Overton, 2010). In the cases of culture and biology, holism invites us to acknowledge that even if we focus on just one component of each system – a single gene, a single cultural trait – we also need to recognize that these units must be contextualized because they operate as part of systems that function as wholes (e.g., genome, brain, cultural self, organism, community, population).
Second, the identity of opposites principle “establishes the identity among parts of a whole by casting them not as exclusive contradictions as in the split epistemology but as differentiated polarities (i.e., coequals) of a unified (i.e., indissociable), inclusive matrix – as a relation” (Overton, 2010, p. 14, emphasis in original). According to this principle, culture is biology and biology is culture: they are coequal and inseparable. Both are part of the matrix of evolution, adaptation, and transformation. Culture and biology are constantly engaged in a co-constructing feedback loop, in a reciprocal codetermination (Overton & Reese, 1973), that we are only beginning to understand. “The fact that a behavior implicates activity of the biological system does not imply that it does not implicate activity of the cultural system, and the fact that the behavior implicates activity of the cultural system does not imply that it does not implicate activity of the biological system. In other words, the identity of opposites establishes the metatheoretical rationale for the theoretical position that biology and culture (like culture and person, biology and person, etc.) operate in a truly interpenetrating manner” (Overton, 2010, p. 15, emphasis in original).
Third, the opposites of identity principle aims at establishing a bedrock for inquiry by moving to a second moment of analysis – after the identity of opposites – in which the law of contradiction is restated and categories again exclude each other (Overton, 2010). Hence, next we should consider that culture is not biology, as each system is given a unique identity that differentiates it. This principle provides a platform in which these new opposites – culture and biology – become standpoints, points of view, lines of sight (Latour, 1993), or levels of analysis (Overton, 2010). “Although explicitly recognizing that any behavior is 100% biology and 100% culture, alternative points-of-view permit the scientist to analyze the behavior from a biological or from a cultural standpoint. Biology and culture no longer constitute competing alternative explanations; rather, they are two points-of-view on an object of inquiry that has been created by and will be fully understood only through multiple viewpoints” (Overton, 2010, pp. 15–16).
Finally, the synthesis of wholes principle functions as a third moment of analysis in the dialectical undertaking of relational epistemology, as it proposes a resolution to the bipolar tension of the opposites of identity by moving away from this conflict to formulate a new system that integrates the two poles (Overton, 2010). For instance, the person can function as a supra-ordinate system that coordinates, synthesizes, and resolves the tension between culture and biology by regulating and organizing them within the self (Magnusson & Stattin, 1998). In this synthesis, a standpoint provides a stable base for future research (Overton, 2010). From the person standpoint we can examine how the relation between culture and biology shapes individual differences in development. From the biology standpoint, we can investigate the relation between culture and the person by focusing on correlates of brain functioning. From the cultural standpoint, we can inquire into the relation between person and biology by centering on cultural variation in a given domain. In sum, Overton's (2010) relational epistemology provides a invaluable set of guiding principles for the study of culture and biology." (Causadias 8-9)
Causadias, Jose M., Eva Telzer, Nancy Gonzales. The Handbook of Culture and Biology. Wiley-Blackwell, 2017-08-30.
Jeanine Pirro has determined, and rightly so a truth, a relationship between, the hijab symbol of adherence to a core sacred codex for designating Muslim behavior which “establishes the identity among parts of a whole by casting them not as exclusive contradictions as in the split epistemology but as differentiated polarities (i.e., coequals) of a unified (i.e., indissociable), inclusive matrix – as a relation” consistently informing violence, oppression and terror-genocide. Ilhan Omar by wearing such a symbol of adherence to such a codex of coequals of a unified inclusive matrix informing evil is ":antithetical to the United States Constitution" regards its core tenets liberty, equality and fraternity.
The 'fashion' is therefore an abstraction to cover the enforcement of a moral symbol nothing more nothing less. You are either seen as an immoral female or you wear the headscarf. 'Conforming choice' is not free choice as it contains an inherent deviance paradigm.
Comments
Post a Comment