Tuesday, August 16, 2016

Should the concern not be the reverse-The Islamic/Muslim categorisation engine of Other is so obvious even idiots understand what is expected?


'Islam for Dummies': IS recruits have poor grasp of faith, By AYA BATRAWY, PAISLEY DODDS and LORI HINNANT, Aug. 15, 2016

The d
angerous assumption of the article 'Islam for Dummies': IS recruits have poor grasp of faith, despite the evidence, determines a 'poor grasp' of an inherent cultural terror-genocide excuses a culture of its terror against Other when a 'sufficient grasp' be it 'poor' or 'complete' enables the exact same outcome.

Please Explain: Nazi (Hitler-Mein Kampf) & Muslim (Mohammed-Quran) Cultural Codex Construct of Other. Why it is One Is and One Is-Not. Yet both = "I don't mean participated, I mean observed."


If the religious leaders compete with the extremists (religious leaders) on Islamic knowledge, I cannot guarantee that they would win. That’s what worries me,” said Adudulkrep, who is also head of the state-run Xinjiang Islamic Institute...."
CHINA LOSING BATTLE AGAINST EXTREMIST ISLAMIC TEACHINGS, SAYS MUSLIM OFFICIAL MARCH 30, 2015

"Culture, of course, is related to violence in general and not only to structural violence. For example, culture influences the determination of "thresholds" which pressure on a person must overcome in order to move that person from being controllable, or even positive, to being negative (that is, into violence)." The Culture of Violence, Chp 3. On the relationship between violence and culture - Galtung's concept

Should the concern not be the reverse-The Islamic/Muslim categorisation engine of Other is so obvious even idiots understand what is expected?

This is the real concern for Other the existence of a cultural codex whose simplistic interpretation imbues the adherent with as much motivation and supporting codex justification for murdering Other as would the ability of memorising and reciting the whole Qur'an from cover to cover and cognitively explicitly understanding the inherent meaning.

So the danger is not that any adherent lacks an in depth understanding of a cultural codex but that such a codex enables such cultural derived infamy to be able to be systemically informed in the first place via an adherent idiot-partially-fully across content or a genius partially-fully across content. For clearly the simplistic nature of the content of the Quran enables both an idiot and genius to understand with relative ease without pictures what is required ethically-morally-behaviorally utilising codex constructs of dealing with Other a methodology which must inform terror-genocide not 
may.

Clearly
 such organisational prowess as exhibited by IS, Al Qaeda, Boko Haram, Hezbollah,...... tells humanity clearly those running the show are not lacking in intelligence-cultural justification and authority otherwise they would not exist. Why is it this excusing of a culture because they utilise the ignorant-expendable-not so bright-youth in a culture (is this unusual) to be sacrificed in the cultural front line taken seriously - Nazi-Russian-Chinese-etc revolutions did not utilise the same-did it excuse the cultural 'many' these 'few' were derived from?

It is the fact both the intellectual elite and those they utilise to carry out their tactics have to be integrally culturally connected via cultural drived understanding and purpose initially to be able to exist harmoniously in the same space, which determines it is not the paucity or otherwise of the understanding of a cultural ideology-doctrine, it is the reality such connected relationships are enabled by the culture, in this case the Islamic/Muslim culture, to systemically inform across time and space such aggression against Other.

How long is a piece of string? The fact is, one only has to read the first pages of the Quran to get the idea of what is demanded of a Muslim regards Other. 

Muslims, the droll to the severely educated know enough via cultural codex, development process and dense network systems to swing the sword in ‘defence’ of Islam is not condemned but a source of increased status in this world and the next - is this not the point - the message regards Other in the Muslim codex and development process is so obvious it does not take a genius to get the message.

How Do You Stop a Future Terrorist When the Only Evidence Is a Thought? Wrong Question. First realise the 'Thought' is not their own it is their cultures.

Friday, August 12, 2016

Where does the threat come from? A small number of people in Australia adhere to an interpretation of Islam that is selective, violent and extreme.

small number its a lie and you know it.

The complaints allege that in some cases key elements of intelligence reports were removed, resulting in a document that didn’t accurately capture the analysts’ conclusions, sources familiar with the protest said. But the complaint also goes beyond alleged altering of reports and accuses some senior leaders at CENTCOM of creating an unprofessional work environment. One person who knows the contents of the written complaint sent to the inspector general said it used the word “Stalinist” to describe the tone set by officials overseeing CENTCOM’s analysis.

Many described a climate in which analysts felt they could not give a candid assessment of the situation in Iraq and Syria. Some felt it was a product of commanders protecting their career advancement by putting the best spin on the war.
Some reports crafted by the analysts that were too negative in their assessment of the war were sent back down the chain of the command or not shared up the chain, several analysts said. Still others, feeling the climate around them, self-censored so their reports affirmed already-held beliefs.
Exclusive: 50 Spies Say ISIS Intelligence Was Cooked ‘CANCER WITHIN’ 09.10.15

Sunday, July 31, 2016

9 out of 10 people hold a delusional belief: Your kidding surely the other 10% were deluded regards their delusion.

Your kidding surely the other 10% were deluded regards their delusion. The very nature of not knowing why we are here automatically creates an underlying delusional assumption which enables us to put one foot after the other for we have to delude ourselves what we see surely will not morph into something beyond our comprehension. That's why religions exist to give us certainty, so comforting, except for those who are not so certain who have to put up with the behaviors of those who feel forced to convince us their delusion is an oh so fine place to be.

It depends it appears upon your cultures definition of delusion to excuse a number of sins and to be able to stick to comforting assumptions.

"The case of Anders Breivik, who committed mass murder in Norway in 2011, stirred controversy among forensic mental health experts. His bizarrely composed compendium and references to himself as the “Knights Templar” raised concerns that he had a psychotic mental illness. Beliefs such as Mr. Breivik's that precede odd, unusual, or extremely violent behavior present a unique challenge to the forensic evaluator, who sometimes struggles to understand those beliefs. Psychotic disorder frequently is invoked to characterize odd, unusual, or extreme beliefs, with a classification that has evolved over time. However, the important concept of overvalued idea, largely ignored in American psychiatry, may better characterize these beliefs in some cases. We discuss the definitions of delusion and overvalued ideas in the context of Anders Breivik's rigidly held extreme beliefs. We also review the British definition of overvalued idea and discuss McHugh's construct, to introduce the term “extreme overvalued belief” as an aid in sharpening the forensic evaluator's conceptualization of these and similar beliefs."

Anders Breivik: Extreme Beliefs Mistaken for Psychosis, 2016, Tahir Rahman, MD, Phillip J. Resnick, MD and Bruce Harry, MD

The trouble is delusion is driving our current inter-cultural policy where the reactionary actions of citizens such as Anders Breivik are the inevitable consequence of unleashing the same against your own citizens. You put one cultural force of 'evil' in your political/social space in time what will always, always rise to meet it?

Pagans utilising religious classical demonising to control political/social opposition simply is not going to work in fact determining those opposed to terror-genocide and tragic misogynistic outcomes of a culture in their streets as evil deviants, shaming and even criminalizing them leaving them no room to argue politically/socially against the infamy before them will and does lead to what? Damascus an example of religious classical demonising to control political/social space working, "a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony."?

"The existence of the Jewish colony in China was discovered by the Jesuit Fathers in the seventeenth century, if not earlier; Kaifung, some four hundred and fifty-miles south-west of Peking, being the headquarters of the colony. When Martin visited the place in 1866, he found the synagogue, supposed to be built in 1164, in ruins; the Jews had dispersed, some having become Mohammedans, and not one being able to speak a word of Hebrew. In 1850 certain Hebraic rolls were recovered from the few remaining descendants of former Jews, .." 
China in Transformation, A. R. Colquhoun, 1898 

"Experience has taught me that all argument is useless with fanatical young Nazi of this kind, and so I say nothing….
..the Germans (inclusive of the Nazi) that great unified people are looking for peace and see friendship with Britain as a basis for peace not only for themselves but for everyone else..
In fact, if the extremist’s elements had prevailed. I have not the least doubt that disruption would have been more drastic and that we should have real reason by now to fear German aggression from both a military as well as political point of view.”
Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937

“It (Damascus-Syria) has seen empires and tyrants come and go; it offers a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony. It is a wonderful city in which to be. …. a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony"
British Historian Dan Cruickshank BBC series "Cruickshank's Adventures in Architecture, Episode 5 - Connections, Syria, Damascus 2008, First aired on BBC Two in April 2008

Afghanistan's dwindling Sikh, Hindu communities flee new abuses, Reuters, KABUL | BY HAMID SHALIZI, Jun 22, 2016 

"Obama described how he has watched Indonesia gradually move from a relaxed, syncretistic Islam to a more fundamentalist, unforgiving interpretation; large numbers of Indonesian women, he observed, have now adopted the hijab, the Muslim head covering...... 
"Early on, Obama saw Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, the president of Turkey, as the sort of moderate Muslim leader who would bridge the divide between East and West—but Obama now considers him a failure and an authoritarian, one who refuses to use his enormous army to bring stability to Syria." 
The Obama Doctrine: The U.S. president talks through his hardest decisions about America’s role in the world. By JEFFREY GOLDBERG, The Atlantic, APRIL 2016

Thursday, July 28, 2016

THE HUMAN TOLL OF TERROR=THE ISLAMIC/MUSLIM CULTURAL WAR TOLL OF TERROR

The pace and scope of the killing are dizzying. Some 300 members of families blown apart by bombs as they celebrated the end of Ramadan in Baghdad. Forty-nine dead at the Istanbul airport, 40 more in Afghanistan. Nine Italians, seven Japanese, three students at American universities and one local woman brutalized in the diplomatic quarter of Dhaka, Bangladesh. The bodies piled up on a bus in Somalia, at a mosque and video club in Cameroon, at a shrine in Saudi Arabia.
All that carnage was in a single week — a single week of summer in what feels like an endless stream of terror attacks. Orlando and Beirut. Paris and Nice and St. Etienne-du-Rouvray, France. Germany and Japan and Egypt. Each bomb or bullet tearing holes in homes and communities.
THE HUMAN TOLL OF TERROR New York Times, JULY 26, 2016

2016 AD France, Belgium, Sydney, London, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Kenya……….
" the strategy of Islamic State is to ask Muslims to perpetrate terrorist attacks so that French people think that all Muslims are potential terrorists, then Muslims feel discriminated against, making them more susceptible to Islamic State ideology."
=
391 AD: Egypt Alexandria……..
".the strategy of Christian monks is to ask Christians to perpetrate terrorist attacks so that Roman people think that all Christians are potential terrorists, then Christians feel discriminated against, making them more susceptible to Christian monk ideology."

These are both cultural wars taking bits in time and space and determining there is no inherent imminent and present threat to your culture or your citizens despite the increasing number of bloody bodies in your streets is a very dangerous error. The Romans/Greeks thought their reason could overcome why is it Western elites are just as conceitful and believe as cultural elites in the past, time, the all so obvious benefits of their culture will resolve irreconcilable political/social notions of what passes for good and evil-deviance?

Pagans have heard this all before from apologists-defenders of terror-genocide constructs. These 'few' Christian monks and Islamist radicals come from the families, communities, institutions cultural codex driven development process and dense network systems they are not innocent. This is a cultural war because of significant value-belief differences and as Lincoln said either one or the other will in time take the space for they both cannot exist for long together without social hostility escalating.

There are only three factors which ever underpin cultural systemic terror-genocide against Other cultures which are not related to bounded space factors alone (i.e. the British in Ireland, India, France in Algeria etc.), the existence of cultural codex containing political/social ethic-value-belief-motivation and methodology significantly different than Other cultures, cultural development process informing as we see heightened reactionary behavior to perceived transgressions by adherents and Other in the same space (Globalization means we are all in the same space in a cultural war), and dense network systems - 'more mobile phones than guns', monitoring/alignment/indoctrination, and invariably with religious ideologies cultural separation of men and women's ratcheting up men's aggression as they compete for status. So called lone wolves are therefore not alone and inevitable from such a paradigm. You will see many more if inter-cultural policy proceeds as it is now.

Cultural codex - development process - dense network system of the non-radicalized, continually stunned law abiding 'moderate’ each time an altruistic punisher/enforcer/aligner inevitably appears in the 'many' ‘innocent’ ranks creates the terror not ISIS not the monks as they do not make up their own ethics-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology the ‘many’ via their above three factors do.

Delete the cultural codex from public and private spheres the terror-genocide stops, fiddle with the other two possibly reduce impact but the culture will adapt and keep delivering the 'few' and persist in ideas of marginalization and mental illness it will simply get worse.

What happens in the end-game - we can see it now in Turkey, as we have seen it throughout history.

"Not surprisingly, religions tend to increase intolerance only when they are dominant."

People’s opium? Religion and economic attitudes, Luigi Guisoa, Paola Sapienzad, Luigi Zingalese, 2002

So you have seen nothing yet compared to what's to come.

I believe we should try something different than the usual endgame resolution of be exiled or exterminated or convert on the spot through pure fear of the previous two options, for those insisting upon holding to a significantly destructive belief 'rational' systems. Exile has been used in the past simply moves the ideology problem from one space to another in a globalised world this type of cultural derived behavior is simply not going away utilising such a method, as for extermination you simply become as a society, and reflected within subsequent institutions what you wanted to remove from the public and private sphere in the first place .

I believe we should utilise our institutions/methods/intellect to analyse why such cultural constructs are so destructive and thereby provide the political/social will to develop inter-cultural policy which forces adherents to such destructive cultures to in time move to another less damaging 'rational' construct. i.e. remove the cultural codex, development process and cultural network systems informing such infamy from our public and private spheres - obviously this will not be easy nor without reactive violence from an already violent culture - but the alternative is throwing a dice as to whether or not Modernity survives and I for one am not willing to sacrifice another child not one simply for the privilege of having this culture flourish to inform even more tragedy for humanity.

How Do You Stop a Future Terrorist When the Only Evidence Is a Thought? Wrong Question. First realise the 'Thought' is not their own it is their cultures.


I find I have left out Orlando there are so many names of names they no longer matter as something as tragic or even, as we are no longer surprised, something much more gruesome is derived from the Islamic/Muslim culture and still we do not act which means more names of names of names... to be forgotten so the policy continues to inform the same and worse beyond our current imagining as for those coming across Auschwitz concentration camp another culture derived artifact created for the same reason as the Islamic/Muslim Other victims-and still we do not act against the 'many' of the culture responsible so the 'few' keep coming as they must.

Friday, July 15, 2016

#Nice #France History=It will only get worse→Culture=Terror ∴ hold to account the culture creating and sustaining the altruistic 'few' enforcers/punishers or change nothing.

#Nice #France Thursday, July 14 Bastille Day 2016

Why?

The 'few' are created and sustained via the cultures 'many' non-radicalised. 'moderate', law abiding families, communities and institutions development process infant-child-adolescent-adult imbued with cultural ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology individuals do not make up their own the culture is therefore culpable - the few will be replaced as we tragically see each and every day.

How Do You Stop a Future Terrorist When the Only Evidence Is a Thought? Wrong Question. First realise the 'Thought' is not their own it is their cultures.

Pagans have seen this before and it will not stop until either the pagans culture is destroyed or the pagans remove the insidious cultural codex informing terror-genocide as the evidence clearly shows historic and current, from humanities midst

Monday, July 4, 2016

ERP ERP Bacon = ER=EPR


The mantra of the uncertain when believing intuitively something may be an 'answer' but not able to defend the 'answer' logically with any existent authority.

"I cannot however, base this conviction on logical reasons, but can only produce my little finger as witness, that is I offer no authority which would be able to command any kind of respect outside of my own hand.” (Einstein to Born, 2 Mar. 1947.)

Inventing an unimpeachable God-authority be it a particular human or spiritual entity resolves this dilemma for the certain but invariably even the 'good' of such a faith cannot stop what happens as a result of utilising such a human construct when logic fails in the first instance.

"'We will be killed one by one': Berkeley student hacked to death in Dhaka massacre made haunting call to her father as she cowered from terrorists."

"The pagans occupied the Serupium and the museion to protect them and the monks and a large Christian crowds, really a rabble, it would be equivalent to the old mob in the early Roman Empire. They stormed into these buildings smashing the statues, destroying the papyrus scrolls then the fighting spread across the city of Alexandria. Of course the Imperial army did nothing the population was maddened over the issue. They broke in carted off the cult statues to be melted down, they were turned into cookery, they were turned them into liturgical objects, for the use by Christians. .the pagans that witnessed it, witnessed this destruction were absolutely intimidated and there are reports of conversions on the spot. .. The result of this attack on the Serupium and museion was that classical Alexandria was essentially destroyed and Christian Alexandria emerged. .. The Christians finally destroyed the pagan sanctuaries, where essentially between 391-414 wiped out that elite class that provided the neo-platonic philosophers.”


"In Vietnam, .. the managing council of the government-recognized Cao Dai religion, a syncretistic religious movement that originated in Vietnam in the 20th century, orchestrated an assault on followers of an unsanctioned Cao Dai group in September 2012, injuring six. The head of the Cao Dai managing council said the reason for the assault was that the followers of the unsanctioned group were not worshipping according to the dictates of the council"


"In Buddhist-majority Sri Lanka, .. monks attacked Muslim and Christian places of worship, including reportedly attacking a mosque in the town of Dambulla in April 2012 and forcibly occupying a Seventh-day Adventist church in the town of Deniyaya and converting it into a Buddhist temple in August 2012"

"Muslim-majority Egypt, attacks on Coptic Orthodox Christian churches and Christian-owned businesses were on the rise well before the acceleration in attacks that took place following the ouster of Islamist president Mohamed Morsi in July 2013. In August 2012, in the village of Dahshur, a dispute between a Christian and a Muslim led to one death and more than a dozen injuries. Several Christian homes and businesses were destroyed and nearly all Christian families fled the village"


"Communities (cultures) tend to be guided less than individuals by conscience and a sense of responsibility. How much misery does this fact cause mankind! It is the source of wars and every kind of oppression, which fill the earth with pain, sighs and bitterness." (Albert 

Einstein, 1934)

". Not surprisingly, religions tend to increase intolerance only when they are dominant."
People’s opium? Religion and economic attitudes, Luigi Guisoa, Paola Sapienzad, Luigi Zingalese, 2002

Not that the secular ideology is not capable of the same but does this mean we have to sit silent or be accused of duplicity when raising objection and remedy?

My view is there is a fatal assumption inherent in Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (‘UDHR”) and it is this.

One wonders why. Does it matter why we are born into this world determining some things
are pleasurable somethings are not. The most pleasurable are our children and their children's children and our concern and delight in their progressing into the future. It could be the scientist searching for 'the answer' are leading us into disappointment and it is understandable the fear of what each new discovery/insight may bring us, closer and closer to the reason for our existence.

So we exist in perpetual wars fought by those who determine they already have the 'answer' and those who to the contrary determine otherwise, quite rightly given an 'answer' is immediately followed by another question which if unable to be answered satisfactorily determines the previous final 'answer' a matter of faith and as we know any 'answer' which cannot be justified rationally/logically from empirical evidence may be a very dangerous faith indeed.

One also has to consider the mere magnitude of the nature of what we confront on our journey from birth to death, which would tend to indicate it is rather conceitful and even possibly delusional to determine humans as a species can or even will hold the last/first in a series of matryoshka dolls and be satisfied they 'know' they 'know' for can you ever be certain understanding the full nature of the barrel within which you are enclosed then to be able to explain the existence of the barrel itself.

But it is clearly the pleasure of exploration and discovery we experience from our very first breath which in my opinion determines such an endeavour of much worth despite having to fight wars all along the way against those who are certain they 'know'.

As the sacred book of the uncertain 'The Restaurant at the End of the Universe'-Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy' determines, the search, and I would surmise the pleasure, satisfaction, is not for obtaining the 'right 'answer' it is for subsequently being able to formulate the 'right' question.

The Quantum Fabric of Space-Time, QUANTA magazine, By K.C. Cole, 
April 24, 2015

Tuesday, June 28, 2016

Iain Dale: "A friend of mine has just told me he and his wife had been disinvited to a BBQ this evening because they have voted LEAVE"

“It (Damascus-Syria) has seen empires and tyrants come and go; it offers a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony. It is a wonderful city in which to be. …. a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony"
British Historian Dan Cruickshank BBC series "Cruickshank's Adventures in Architecture, Episode 5 - Connections, Syria, Damascus 2008, First aired on BBC Two in April 2008

When the petition for the 2nd EU Vote Hits 16,775,993 wake me up until then better off accepting Democracy decided. There is an alternative it is called civil war-it appears many have forgotten why humans invented Democracy. 

Do we call another election because we are not satisfied with the result - the Democratic act will become meaningless, in fact inform breaking down of society as citizens go into the streets to fight for a recount and opposing citizens go into the streets to protect the result of the vote - further polarising the politic - a refusal to compromise and accept the majority view so necessary for the survival of Democracy. The result will end in violence being an inherent part of the new 'Democratic' politic. Being 'disinvited to a BBQ' is a clear indication the political elite are leading us inexorably to more than hurt feelings, it is a sign of dangerous political enclaving.

For those who clearly have no idea what a Democracy means in practice
:

‘It was one of Lincoln’s ways of working out his chief value to the country, and that value was his clear sense from the start it was our democratic scheme that was at stake, and that if it was to be saved, every citizen who could aid must help to give all that was in them.

Lincoln seems to have put it something like this to himself:

“Everybody in the country has had a part in bringing this thing about; everybody feels they have a right to say how things shall be handled; everybody that is worth their salt is going to exercise that right, and they are going to do it according to the kind of person they are – according to their temperament, their training, their self-control, their meanness, and their goodness. If we are going to put this thing through and prove that citizens can govern themselves, we must get from them what they can give, and we must let them give it in their own way.”
 Source: The Life of Lincoln, Tachell


A timely reminder of the benchmark for argumentation in a Democracy unless you want blood in the streets.

"I start off believing something I make a claim to you and in the process of that interaction you show that I am wrong. Of course our ideal is a person shown to be wrong immediately acknowledges he or she is wrong picks up and goes right on from there. But we know being shown to be wrong, can be unsettling, can lead to lose of face, to diminish one’s own self-worth, and can diminish ones esteem in the conversation or in the community, the society so when one engages in an argument one is taking on that risk to shown to be wrong, also one is taking on the risk of having to alter ones system of beliefs to take into account something new. To add something to the storehouse of beliefs we have to eliminate some belief to modify some belief, all those things can be psychologically disturbing. It’s cognitively disturbing particular if it suggests we have beliefs that are not fully consistent with one another or not carefully enough worked out.

1. In an argument adversaries do not want to overpower the adversary, to bludgeon or coerce the adversary. That kind of victory is meaningless, what they want is to convince the adversary by the arguments they advance by the claims that they make and the structure of the reasons they offer on behalf of those claims.

2. They value the judgement of their adversaries and want ascent if ascent is freely given.

3. We may intensely disagree but we value that person as a person, so we want a voluntary ascent, the kind of judgment which comes freely without coercion.

4. In valuing the personhood of the opponent our adversary the arguer claims the same values for her or for himself.

We can be too easily be misled by the fact argumentation does have adversarial elements so we think of it as a zero sum game, in which I must lose in order for you to win, or in which I somehow suffer as a result of what you have achieved and it is important for us to realize when we look at a controversy and the participants in it while there are adversarial elements in their behavior they are basically showing respect for each other by taking on these risks, the risk of being wrong and the risk of needing to alter their beliefs.

Five key assumptions:
1. Argumentation is audience dependent.
2. It deals with uncertainty.
3. It involves justification for claims, not proof.
4. It is fundamentally cooperative.
5. And it entails risks."

Argumentation Prof. D.N. Robinson 


And the risk in a democratic vote is you will lose. It is the measure of the character of not only you but the character of the democracy itself and it capacity to survive what happens next.

You start determining your adversary are less intelligent, ill-informed in fact not proper humans what do you think you are starting along the road to the very road you claim your adversaries are on.








  • If
     by some perfidy Britain-you do manage to have a new referendum why not be honest this time, clearly we all know it was not about staying or not staying in the EU because of the EU consensus politics the English sausage was not up to scratch it was fundamentally driven by inter-cultural social hostility and particularly the terror-genocide now coming from both directions.

    “Extremist groups, whatever their orientation, are gaining ground in Germany,” Thomas de Maiziere, the interior minister, said.
    “Security forces observed not just a rise in membership but also an increase in violence and brutality.”

    Extremist violence increasing in Germany, warns report,  The Telegraph, Justin Huggler, berlin, 28 JUNE 2016

    The
    questions therefore should be:
    1. Do you believe Multiculturalism needs reviewing?
    2. Do you believe Freedom of Religion needs reviewing?
    3. Do you believe cultures should be held accountable and excluded from public and private spheres if their cultural codex constructs and development processes systemically inform increasing terror-genocide in your streets and tragic misogynistic consequences for women?
    Let’s be honest these are the 'unasked questions' our current Sociology Departments in our Western universities for decades have trained you not to ask. It is amazing how the Tranquility of Silence informing infamy can be achieved so effectively by the so called 'good'. 

    The consequence of this Tranquility of Silence enforced by postmodern sociology ethical nihilist altruist enforcers utilising brand new definitions of:
    • 'freedom' (as 'freedom' is a subjective state one cultures 'freedom' is simply another cultures fascism and vice versa ),
    • 'race' (which has been hijacked so as any challenge to cultural constructs is bigotry, linked inherently to symbols of the holocaust,  'racism' no matter how vile in modernity human rights terms the cultural behavior informs regards Other and women), 
    • 'feminism' (now inclusive of oppressive religious constructs-symbols-behaviors)
      This is the future you want for humanity particularly for women which is developing right in front of you?Feminist Swedish Politicians Defends Migrant Rapists, ‘Worse’ When Western Men Do it.
    endemic terror-genocide now developing in both directions - Damascustisation where the Left and even some conservatives determine despite increasing social hostility, fracturing of citizenry and even bloody bodies in our streets Western Democracies are "a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony" is this really the world you want for you and yours a dangerous lie which will get worse - maybe we all should be checking our sacred assumptions before any next vote.

    Ever wondered why the Right has found it necessary to rise? Review Newton physics. Something just as ugly must be in the same space looking like roses to some yet informing...

    How Do You Stop a Future Terrorist When the Only Evidence Is a Thought? Wrong Question. First realise the 'Thought' is not their own it is their cultures.

    Chris Madsen Democracy did not decide, Mark. This show of hands is neither democrstic nor decisive. I haven't the background in pseudoscience that I'd probably need to debate your questions. But I do know that a referendum is not a mandate in the UK, and that an Act has to be repealed before anyone can legally begin a Brexit. Let's cross the bridges one at a time.
    LikeReply1 hr
    Mark Smith pseudoscience? We (humans) work from definitions now if the following definition of Democracy is different from your perspective please provide it otherwise we will need mystics.

    Democracy: 

    A system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives: a system of parliamentary democracy.

    Control of an organization or group by the majority of its members

    1. The eligible members of the British citizenry were provided with an opportunity to 'control'/'influence' policy direction of their Government by being given the opportunity to vote (democratic method) regards the degree of autonomy they desired regards a political/social organisation of which they were a member.

    2. In a democratic vote eligible members of the British citizenry (who bothered to turn up for under the rules which applied, rules of which all should have been cognisant - no one was forced to vote) decided in a majority decision to exit the EU the finer details of which all were aware required to be worked out subsequently. 

    The politicians-political/social commentators as in a Democracy on both sides made it clear to the electorate even though this plebiscite was not legally binding the result of the vote would be taken as the will of the people and would be acted upon - indicating their view at the same time of the relative risks and benefits of doing so. 

    Both sides involved themselves in the most absurd accusations and claims regards leaving or remaining as issues of such importance elicit. 

    3. Citizens are not by the very nature of being human across all the issues which may be pertinent to a decision on either side, no side can ever claim with 'rational' certainty they are the holders of the holy chalice of divine truth. 

    Each side has their own worldview from which they justify their decisions and of course therefore they will always be right. It is left therefore to the citizen despite these limitations to utilise whatever relative degrees of agency they may possess to make a decision. 

    Those who invariably are unhappy as you and yours with the outcome will utilise whatever device they can understanding this human fallibility to claim rightfully the other side clearly were lacking in the full picture - how true of both sides - and as expected will use whatever technical excuse to determine the Democratic will of the people is subverted to their self-serving logic (in democratic terms).

    Final result:
    "Final results in Thursday’s historic referendum gave the “Leave” campaign 52 percent, while “Remain” took 48 percent. Voter turnout was reported high across Britain, even with heavy rain falling in many areas."

    You keep ignoring the will of the people what will start appearing in the streets-'rational' argument? France ignored the non-binding will of the people what is happening. The 'good' end up informing what when they force their political/social abstract will based upon dangerous assumptions upon the majority?

    May I advise you to forget 'pseudoscience' and spend some time studying Roman history 64AD to 500AD you will see something disturbingly familiar.

    Thursday, June 23, 2016

    How Do You Stop a Future Terrorist When the Only Evidence Is a Thought? Wrong Question. First realise the 'Thought' is not their own it is their cultures.


    How Do You Stop a Future Terrorist When the Only Evidence Is a Thought? New York Times, by RUKMINI CALLIMACHI, JUNE 21, 2016


    The answer is critical to stopping this-"'We will be killed one by one': Berkeley student hacked to death in Dhaka massacre made haunting call to her father as she cowered from terrorists... But authorities deny ISIS was behind attack" Daily Mail, 
    3-July 2016

    Bombing Kills More Than 140 in Baghdad, NTY, By FALIH HASSAN, TIM ARANGO and OMAR AL-JAWOSHY, JULY 3, 2016

    Suicide bomber targets Pakistan’s lawyers, kills at least 53, The Washington Post, By Paul Schemm August 8 2016


    The Scale of Turkey’s Purge Is Nearly Unprecedented, NYT, By JOSH KELLER, IARYNA MYKHYALYSHYN and SAFAK TIMUR AUG. 2, 2016

    "Turkish authorities fired more than 2,800 judges and prosecutors on Wednesday, in the latest purge related to the July 15 coup, broadcaster CNN Turk reported.
    Turkey has sacked or suspended some 80,000 people from the civil service, judiciary, police and courts following the attempted putsch, which it blames on followers of the U.S.-based cleric Fethullah Gulen."

    Turkish authorities fire more than 2,800 judges, prosecutors, REUTERS, 
    Aug 24, 2016



    Genocide against Christians in the Middle East

    "Rahami
    is a 28-year-old American citizen who lived in Elizabeth, New Jersey and was born in Afghanistan. Law enforcement sources told CNN Rahami had travelled to Afghanistan a number of times.

    "Once again someone we were told is ok turns out to be a terrorist who wants to destroy our country & its people - how did he get thru system?"..."

    New York bomb suspect Ahmad Khan Rahami captured by police after shootout, SMH, by Josephine Tovey, SEPTEMBER 20 2016

    If
    it was indeed ISIS, IS, etc or the many many Muslim altruistic representative names historic, current and developing does it really matter to the victims or those families, communities, and nations suffering unfathomable grief derived from just one 'hacked' life of a child causes let alone in aggregate the millions over time past and to come? When will we hold to account the culture whose cultural codex construct of other, development process infant-child-adolescent-adult and dense network control systemically since the seventh century have created and sustained these cultural altruistic 'few' punishers/aligners who deal terror-genocide against Other and even against their own? Should such a cultural recipe delivering such tragedy continue to be tolerated in our midst?

    "There are no boundaries to the intimate reach of political violence. What happens in one part of the world reaches the bodies and minds of peoples in other parts of the world. .. “Witnesses as well as victims are subject to the dialectic of trauma” (Herman, 1992, p. 2)."
    WITNESSING THE EFFECTS OF POLITICAL VIOLENCE IN FAMILIES: MECHANISMS
    OF INTERGENERATIONAL TRANSMISSION AND CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS, Kaethe Weingarten, Harvard Medical School, The Family Institute of
     Cambridge

    This means a terrorist-genocide attack and progressive setting up of ethics-morals methodology which inevitably leads to a 'cleansing-purging' of societal opposition even within a culture of terror-genocide political/social dominated space as in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, ... as well as Other cultures dominated spaces are perceived rationally-rightly as a clear indication such a cultural codex informing such systemic violent behavior within a cultures behavioral variance is not worthy of continuing to exist within humanities political/social societal 
    space.

    "The time has come for us to be honest with ourselves and indeed each other." said Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenya's president

    'suspicious'=Entire Culture=terror-genocide 'cleansing-purging' as the 'many'='few', as the entire 'good' Nazi culture='few'.

    Kidding ourselves the definitions we utilise to determine all cultures can and are getting on famously has to end if this Muslim terror-genocide is to end.

    “It (Damascus-Syria) has seen empires and tyrants come and go; it offers a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony. It is a wonderful city in which to be. …. a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony"
    British Historian Dan Cruickshank BBC series "Cruickshank's Adventures in Architecture, Episode 5 - Connections, Syria, Damascus 2008, First aired on BBC Two in April 2008

    "The time has come for us to be honest with ourselves and indeed each other. The radicalisation that breeds terrorism is not conducted in the bush at night. It occurs in the full glare of day in homes, in madrasas and in mosques with rogue imams. We must ask the question — where are the parents and families of those who are being radicalized?" said Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenya's president "Our task of countering terrorism has been made all the more difficult by the fact that the planners and financiers of this brutality are deeply embedded in our communities."

    by EDITH HONAN GARISSA, Kenya — Reuters Published Sunday, Apr. 05 2015

    Cultural
    schemas are learn't when, how, why & may inform significantly different reactive responses to a perceived challenge as defined by a culture (be it determined a real or nonexistent challenge from an Other rational model perspective) of cultural codex-a culture's worldview political/social which means? Well for one thing it means an adherent of a culture does not become radicalised in a week attached to 21st century or 7th century technology. It is a dangerous lie. Why would any social psychologist promote or allow such a dangerous deception to continue to exist? Dangerous because what does it allow the culture to continue to deliver to humanities streets?

    "Theorizing about a latent variable must transcend the world of mathematical abstractions and pinpoint a real entity, which plays a causal role in the correlations among manifest variable—regardless of whether this entity is a process, a set of processes, or some common property/characteristic of processes."

    Process Overlap Theory: A Unified Account of the General Factor of IntelligenceKristof Kovacs & Andrew R. A. Conway,  02 Aug 2016

    "How Do You Stop a Future Terrorist When the Only Evidence Is a Thought?" Wrong Question as the 'Thought' is not their own it is their cultures. The right question:

    'How Do You Stop a Culture creating Terrorists (cultural altruistic enforcers/punishers) When the Only Evidence Is a Thought?'

    First realise the 'Thought' is not the terrorists own 'Thought', it is their cultures 'Thought'. You have to face the fact the 'few' terrorists are altruistic enforcers/punishers created for a cultural 'rational' system purpose otherwise the 'few' would never come into existence utilising the ethics-values-beliefs-motivation nor methodology the 'few' do, as social psychology research tells us the 'few' are few in number relative to the whole because of the intrinsic cost of being one of the true-perfect believer ‘few’, and importantly fear & the cultural codex knowledge⇆justification and authority works to achieve the required Tranquility of Silence-relative degrees of cultural acquiescence along the cultural behavioral variance to achieve cultural goals.

    The whole of culture, the ‘many’, are therefore not required at the cultural front nor would it be culturally advisable to do so for how is the culture to sustain itself all out on the front line? Given the extreme cultural methodology of certain cultural derived altruistic enforcers/punishers some cultures necessarily require a relatively sophisticated developed mantel of deniability – otherwise how long would Other cultures put up with their presence before Other cultures moved decisively to remove this attacking culture from their space? States supporting the continuing existence of such a culture in their space necessarily fall in line with the cultures defence strategy as the State have to justify the bloody bodies in the streets are not due to lack of State action. 


    “Instead of responding to attacks against freedom of expression, voices were raised to decry blasphemy and to propose compromise with terrorism. There is no blasphemy in a democracy,” Mr. Rushdie said. ..
    ..the writer decried the reluctance of Western governments to use the words “Muslim” or “Islam,” preferring instead to attribute terrorist attacks to “unbalanced” people or to a generic thing like “radicalism” or “extremism,” even when the attackers themselves say Islam is their motive."

    ‘Satanic Verses’ author Salman Rushdie: ‘Today, I would be accused of Islamophobia, racism’ By Victor Morton - The Washington Times - Tuesday, September 6, 2016

    "..for whatever reason becomes inspired to act ....a violent Islamist ideology which perverts the religion of Islam" said Australian (NSW) Deputy Commissioner Catherine Burn... on two occasions .. Mr Khan abused and threatened people in public for their non-Islamic behaviour. .. allegedly suffers from schizophrenia"
    Suburban stabbing 'the new face of terrorism', The Sydney Morning Herald, by Rachel Olding, September 12, 2016

    'Copy of Islamic State's magazine' SO WHAT TEST. CULTURAL PREJUDICE-SCHEMA DEVELOPED WHEN-HOW-BY WHOM? 'serious mental health issues including schizophrenia'=ACTUAL ACTION? WITHOUT CULTURAL SCHEMA=?

    "The
     Saudi Gazette quoted witnesses as saying that the police - known as the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice - had stopped men who tried to help the girls and warned "it is a sinful to approach them".

    The father of one of the dead girls said that the school watchman even refused to open the gates to let the girls out."

    Saudi police 'stopped' fire rescue BBC, Friday, 15 March, 2002

    "In the proposal, the council advises men to beat their wives if they refuse to dress as he wishes her to, talk to strangers or speak loudly. Wives may also be reprimanded if they give anyone money without the husband giving her permission first."
    Men should ‘lightly beat’ their wives if they refuse sex, according to Islamic council leader, Fionn Hargreaves, staff writers and AFP News Corp Australia Network, MAY 30, 2016

    "The attacks - there have been at least four in the busy city in central Iran in recent weeks - appear aimed at terrorising women who dare to test the boundaries of the Islamic dress code.

    The crimes coincided with the passage of a new parliamentary bill that allows private citizens to enforce "morality" laws."

    Acid attacks in Iran sharpen row over Islamic dress and vigilantism Reuters BY BABAK DEHGHANPISHEH BEIRUT Wed Nov 5, 2014

    "Two women convicted over a genital mutilation procedure on two girls have shown no remorse and only offered "qualified, ambiguous and self-serving" apologies, a NSW (Australian) court has heard."

    Women convicted over 'repugnant' genital mutilation of two girls 'showed no remorse' Australia ABC 6-2-
    2016

    "Javaria
     Saeed, a practicing Muslim, resigned from the SO15 counter-terrorism division of the Metropolitan Police, which was tasked with outreach to the Muslim community. She cited a culture of “political correctness” and two specific cases, in which she alleged a senior Muslim constable had called female genital mutilation (FGM) a “clean, an honorable practice” that “shouldn’t be criminalized.” FGM is illegal in the UK.

    On another occasion, the same officer reportedly said Muslim women who face domestic abuse should seek to resolve the situation via sharia tribunals rather than going through the courts.

    Despite reporting the incidents to her superiors, no action was taken against the offending officer.

    Other officers called her a “bad Muslim” for not wearing a hijab (head covering) and said she would be “better off at home looking after your husband.”

    “My experiences were that it was Muslim officers being racist towards my individual views; also in private, holding racist views against white officers, and sexist views against females,” she told the Sunday Times. “If such views were held and expressed by white officers, they would be fired.”

    Facebook Censors Discussion On Sharia, Facebook censored a video allegedly showing the execution of gay people by jihadis in Libya, from the page "Should America Fear Sharia." BY ELLIOT FRIEDLAND Mon, September 12,
     2016

    "..perverts 
    the religion of Islam"? All enforcing Islamic behavioral constructs in the streets, in Western police departments and security and military establishments and the many who enable them to be there to do so, and are even watching what the Western modernity determines as atrocities, are mentally ill, suffer from schizophrenia, obsessed, extremists - so many? Those objecting to a culture systematically informing terror-genocide and tragic misogynistic outcomes are suffering from a mental illness a phobia? It is rationally based upon the evidence as well as statistically absurd to claim so.

    So claiming you’re the ‘many’ innocent and not culpable is really unacceptable in an inter-cultural conflict where these cultural derived terrorists, as they have to be, utilizing terror-genocide come into Other cultures space and even attack their own as such cultures with an inherent codex construct of terror-genocide tend to do –everyone, everyone in turn may be determined as Other.

    Secondly
     you have to face the fact these 'few' are created via the cultures 'many' non radicalised. 'moderate', law abiding families, communities and institutions development process infant-child-adolescent-adult imbued with cultural ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology individuals do not make up their own the culture is therefore culpable - the few will be replaced.

    ".. survey found that majorities in Morocco, Egypt, Pakistan, and Indonesia—ostensibly moderate Muslim countries—favored a strict application of Shari‘a law in every Islamic country and keeping Western values out of Islamic counties. However, that survey reports the attitudes of residents in non-Western countries that enforce Shari‘a to varying degrees. It might be expected that Muslims in the West—who are immersed in Western culture, values, and democracy—would express different attitudes than their counterparts in the Middle East, Far East, and North Africa. 

    Unfortunately, the results of the current survey strongly suggest that Islam—as it is generally practiced in mosques across the United States—continues to manifest a resistance to the kind of tolerant religious and legal framework that would allow its followers to make a sincere affirmation of liberal citizenship. This survey provides empirical support for the view that mosques across America, as institutional and social settings for mosque-going Muslims, are at least resistant to social cooperation with non-Muslims. Indeed, the overwhelming majority of mosques surveyed promoted literature supportive of violent jihad and a significant number invited speakers known to have promoted violent jihad and other behaviors that are inconsistent with a reasonable construct of liberal citizenship.”

    Shari‘a and Violence in American Mosques, by Mordechai Kedar and 
    David Yerushalmi

    The 'few' of a culture become as they always will when enabled to do so? The'many'.

    "Twitter announcing Thursday, August 18 have suspended accounts 235,000 in the last six months.Twitter ensures that adding to that the 125,000 accounts they had already announced removed between mid-2015 and February 2016, 360,000 such accounts have been closed altogether. " daily suspensions increased by 80% since last year, with immediate peaks after the terrorist attacks " , says the company."
    Twitter says you remove terrorist propaganda 235,000 accounts in six months, THE WORLD, by Morgane Tual, 18.08.2016

    "According to the report, 1077 people were arrested in the EU for terrorism-related offences last year alone, almost half of which took place in France (424).
    The 2015 arrests double those made in 2013, when only 535 were taken into custody.
    Almost all of those arrested last year, 94 per cent, were convicted.
    The numbers of terror attacks and attempts also increased but not at the same rate as arrests, suggesting more are being foiled than carried out."

    Terrorist attacks in Europe: This is how dangerous it has become, Debra Killalea, news.com.au, JULY 22, 
    2016

    "Ahmed
    Adan said his son was born in Kenya but grew up in the United States. Other family members said Dahir Adan was beginning his third year as a student at St. Cloud State University.

    Police told Ahmed Adan about 9 p.m. Saturday that his son had died at the mall, he said. He had “no suspicion” of his son being involved in any terrorist activity, he added. Police raided the apartment on St. Germain Street on Sunday morning and seized photos and other materials, Ahmed Adan said.

    Inside the building where the Adans lived, a neighbor said the younger Adan sometimes wore a security guard uniform. A cousin down the hall in the same building described Dahir Adan as a good person who minded his own business.

    At the news conference Sunday, St. Cloud Mayor Dave Kleis said three of the nine stabbing victims remained hospitalized as of 7 a.m. ...

    Jaylani Hussein, executive director in Minnesota of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said Sunday that “we are definitely concerned about the potential for backlash in the community, both in the immediate run and the longer term.”

    Hussein called the attack “an isolated incident, and we still don’t know the full facts.”

    Ahmed Said, executive director of the Somali American Relations Council, said they don’t know whether religion motivated Adan, “but we know he is a Somali.”

    “Let us not rush and jump into conclusions,” Said said in a statement. “… We strongly stress that everybody calms down and focus on what unites us than what divides us in these difficult times.”

    Barakad Omar, a classmate of Dahir Adan at Apollo High School, said he was “a good kid” and an A student.

    He was more into sports than religion, said Jama Alimad, a community leader and close friend of the family, who described him as “the most assimilated kid in the neighborhood.” He worked part-time as a security guard at Electrolux Home Products in St. Cloud."

    Family identifies attacker behind 'potential act of terrorism' in St. Cloud-9 victims survived knife attacks at St. Cloud mall; ISIL link claimed. By Brandon Stahl, Beatrice Dupuy and Paul Walsh Star Tribune staff writers, SEPTEMBER 19, 2016

    Contained in the last qoute are invalid assumptions and fallacious basis for denial. The most pertinent dangerous assumptions 'There is more that unite us than divide us'" murder by the Muslim culture would not occur if this were the case, also there is no threat from enabling the Islamic/Muslim refugees or even immigrants crossing into Others space and lack of a job or lack of education is the cause of terror.

    Thirdl
    y even with cultures with an inherent cultural terror-genocide construct of Other in their codex there will always be the 'good' in any cultural bounded behavioral variance telling you they want peace and harmony, possibly even believing it to be true, diminishingly reflecting back your own ethics-beliefs within their behavioral variance particularly in an Other dominated political/social space - it is what is systemically occurring in the other part of the same behavioral variance which is the truth of the matter regards the culture.

    "Ahmad Khan Rahami, 28, worked with members of his family at First American Fried Chicken in Elizabeth, New Jersey.
    He lived with his family above the takeout spot, a few miles from Newark Liberty International Airport.
    "He's a very friendly guy, that's what's so scary," said one patron, Ryan McCann.
    "They never seemed out of the ordinary, they just Americanised.
    "You would've never knew anything. He'd always talk about his cars.
    "He loved Civics, he loved going fast, that's what he did, he'd talk about his cars."
    He had attended Middlesex County College, where he majored in criminal justice, from 2010-12, but did not graduate according to school officials.
    Flee Jones, 27, told the New York Times Mr Rahami's appearance and behaviour began to change after he visited his native Afghanistan about four years ago.
    After returning from his trip, he grew a beard, began wearing traditional Muslim robes and prayed in the back of the store.
    He was not listed on counter-terrorism databases, US officials said."

    Ahmad Khan Rahami: US blasts suspect a 'very friendly guy', BBC, 20/9/2015

    "POLICE swooped and arrested a doctor’s teenage son in Melbourne before bombs were found at his Greenvale home, foiling an “imminent terror plot”."

    A friend of the arrested teen’s family said they were respectable, and did not believe he could have done wrong.

    “(He has) no bad preacher. He is a very quiet boy. He cannot drive. His father is a doctor and cannot allow him to do anything wrong,” the friend said.

    “He has to look after his son properly."

    Police find homemade bombs, arrest teen in Greenvale anti-terror raids
    ANTHONY DOWSLEY, SIMON BENSON, DAVID HURLEY HERALD SUN MAY 09, 2015 9:42AM

    "Behaviour of man arrested in Melbourne counter-terrorism raids improved after attending Islamic centre, father says.

    Haidar attended the Al Furqan Islamic study centre and Harun Causevic started going there in July 2014.

    Mr Causevic said the changes in his son were all positive.

    “Before he started to pray, Harun was in the house aggressive, he broke [things], like a child. But after when he started to pray he really changed behaviour, 100 per cent,” he said.

    “Now he was very good, always. Never, never yells, never, never do bad in house."

    Father of suspect in counter-terrorism raid speaks EMMA YOUNGER The NewDaily Apr 19, 20
    15

    The reality of 'more' religion creates a parental delusional state regards the altruistic nature of their children regards Other. Taking religious outliers expounding greater positive altruistic motives regards Other on the basis of their perceived religiosity-spirituality is a very dangerous mistake particularly if you are responsible for policy making - responsible in the process of being responsible for fellow citizens lives.

    "..
    children raised in religious households, who are perceived to be more empathetic and sensitive to justice, are in fact less altruistic to their own class mates .... children from religious households also differ in their ratings of deserved punishment for interpersonal harm (F(2, 847) = 5.80, p < 0.01, h2 = 0.014); this was qualified by significantly harsher ratings of punishment by children from Muslim households than children from non-religious households (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between children from Christian households and non-religious households.".

    The Negative Association between Religiousness and Children’s Altruism across the World, November 05, 2015

    These Muslim terrorists are coming straight from the 'good' families, communities and institutions believing their sons, daughters, fellow adherents are the "very good", 'angels' positively altruistic, the trouble is these 'angels', are Muslim 'angels'.

    Quran 008,012 Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off 
    them.

    The point is Muslim ethics-values-motivation methodology of these 'good' Muslim families, communities and institutions are creating and sustaining within their very midst these 'angels' - clearly the existent Muslim schemas do not contradict but in fact must enable such terrorist behavior otherwise it would not exist. Culture the whole culture including the 'good' must be culpable and held to be so. Why? Individuals do not invent their own ethics-values-beliefs-motivation methodology cultures impose them and they as any system must have an inherent reason from systemically informing the same.

    Fourthly
    your cultural rational view as to the definition of 'moderate' under another cultural 'rational' system can never be assumed to be the same nor any where near it. Holding to this 'moderate' claim as proof a culture does not inherently determine your cultural demise 'conversion' in the end game, particularly in an Other dominated space is a very dangerous approach. Any cultural gatekeeper observed making such a fatal error should be removed immediately from any inter-cultural policy development influence. 

    "But what exactly did they mean by “moderate Islam”? Unpacking that term made it clear how wide the values gap is between Saudi Arabia and its American ally. The kingdom’s “moderate Islam” publicly beheads criminals, punishes apostates and prevents women from traveling abroad without the permission of a male “guardian.

    Don’t even ask about gay rights."

    A Saudi Morals Enforcer Called for a More Liberal Islam. Then the Death Threats Began.
    NTY, By BEN HUBBARD, JULY 10, 2016

    'How Do You Stop a Culture creating Terrorists (cultural altruistic enforcers/punishers) When the Only Evidence Is a Thought?'

    Remove the cultures codex constructs of Other + development process from societal public and private spheres or change nothing.


    If you disagree with the argument and conclusion, to be right you need to prove the following is false:

    Biology Determines Our Human Hands Have the Same Constituent Parts as Other.
    Culture Determines Our Human Hands Will Inform Differing Outcomes for Other.

    And

    Aristotle's Four  causes: Material, Formal, Efficient, Final determine an acorn grows into an Oak tree not a zebra.


    Turkey, Belgium, Orlando, Syria, Iraq,Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sydney, Boston, London,.. .... the list is endless historic and current of Islamic/Muslim derived political and social, oppression and societal fracturing, statistically such systemic cultural derived behavior requires significant reevaluation of sacred assumptions regards Western Democracies current fallible abstract 'rational' paradigms failing to protect and enable a flourishing life in security and peace for citizens.

    "Every set of beliefs introduces its own logic and its own constraints.

    ..to a decision scientist, “rational” means “consistency with some model.” Rational decisions are not necessarily dispassionate, nor well-reasoned, nor selfish. They are not even necessarily good decisions, from others’ perspectives. They simply are consistent."

    Distinguishing Spiritual from Temporal Power, Inventing the Individual, The origins of Western Liberalism, Larry Siedentop, 2014

    "Without the ceaseless pulsating heartbeat of our categorization engine, we would understand nothing around us, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action.

    …..every culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic labels that come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and entities"

    SURFACES AND ESSENCES, ANALOGY AS THE FUEL AND FIRE OF THINKING, Douglas Hofstadter (American professor of cognitive science), Emmanuel Sander (French Psychologist-Developmental Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, Educational Psychology), 2013

    "Culture, of course, is related to violence in general and not only to structural violence. For example, culture influences the determination of "thresholds" which pressure on a person must overcome in order to move that person from being controllable, or even positive, to being negative (that is, into violence)." The Culture of Violence, Chp 3. On the relationship between violence and culture - Galtung's concept

    Cultural codex constructs (categorisation engines) and development process not to blame? As the research determines otherwise you are going have to provide yourself with actual proof your view is correct simply saying it even believing it is not sufficient as evidence to prove the conclusion above invalid. In aggregate political/social terms given the victims and rising you can understand making the effort to question assumptions is required of all of us.

    Whatever are viewed regards the Islamic/Muslim culture or any culture with a terror-genocide construct of Other inherent in their codex for a temporal period of "a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony" it is only ever a temporal space for building to cultural political/social thresholds to enable the renewal of the holocaust against Other, it may not come the next day, the next twenty years, 100 years but it will come.

    And
     you will see/hear the building of Islamic/Muslim rationale for attacks against Other prior, and to ignore them as aberrations of radicals and not as the inherent ethical-belief system of the Islamic/Muslim culture given the bloody bodies informed by the exact same culture elsewhere in time and space is a dangerous delusion for the pronouncements will be made from the highest levels in the Islamic/Muslim cultural hierarchy by the Islamic/Muslim ideological leadership and they will not stop until the cultures codex constructs of Other + development process are removed from societal public and private spheres.

    No merriness here: mosque puts fatwa on Christmas, SMH. by Natalie O'Brien, December 23, 2012

    Sydney siege: Two hostages and gunman dead after heavily armed police storm Lindt cafe in Martin Place, ABC, 16 Dec 2014


    Terror shooting: Teen killer ‘turned’ at Parramatta mosqueTHE AUSTRALIAN, by Dan Box, OCTOBER 5, 2015

    "The existence of the Jewish colony in China was discovered by the Jesuit Fathers in the seventeenth century, if not earlier; Kaifung, some four hundred and fifty-miles south-west of Peking, being the headquarters of the colony. When Martin visited the place in 1866, he found the synagogue, supposed to be built in 1164, in ruins; the Jews had dispersed, some having become Mohammedans, and not one being able to speak a word of Hebrew. In 1850 certain Hebraic rolls were recovered from the few remaining descendants of former Jews, .."
    China in Transformation, A. R. Colquhoun, 1898


    "Experience has taught me that all argument is useless with fanatical young Nazi of this kind, and so I say nothing….
    ..the Germans (inclusive of the Nazi) that great unified people are looking for peace and see friendship with Britain as a basis for peace not only for themselves but for everyone else..
    In fact, if the extremist’s elements had prevailed. I have not the least doubt that disruption would have been more drastic and that we should have real reason by now to fear German aggression from both a military as well as political point of view.”
    Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937

    “It (Damascus-Syria) has seen empires and tyrants come and go; it offers a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony. It is a wonderful city in which to be. …. a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony"

    British Historian Dan Cruickshank BBC series "Cruickshank's Adventures in Architecture, Episode 5 - Connections, Syria, Damascus 2008, First aired on BBC Two in April 2008

    Australian Foiled Australian attacks:
    Australian authorities have disrupted terrorist planning in Australia and thwarted attacks. As a result of their activities, 23 people have been convicted of terrorism offences in Australia in the last four years.
    Below is some information on those who were unsuccessful in their attempts to use chemicals of security concern to do harm on Australian soil.
    ..........
    2008 – Abdul Nacer Benbrika and others
    Benbrika was convicted in 2008 on the charge of intentionally being the leader and a member of a terrorist organisation. During the trial, jurors heard recordings of Benbrika discussing the use of explosives and whether he could obtain 500kg of ammonium nitrate.
    2006 – Faheem Khalid Lodhi
    Lodhi was convicted of terrorism offences in 2006 when the court found evidence to suggest he had planned to bomb the national electricity system.
    A large amount of incriminating material was found in Lodhi’s possession including a handwritten terrorism manual for the manufacture of homemade poisons and explosives.
    Lodhi had provided a false name and fictitious address to a chemical company in order to buy chemicals, and had advised them that he was planning to use the chemicals to start up a detergent company.
    2005 – Omar Baladjam and others
    A series of raids across the Sydney metropolitan area resulted in nine men being arrested and later charged with conspiring to commit a terrorist act. It was alleged that the arrested men had sourced chemicals and materials that could be used in the preparation of an explosive device.
    2004 – Jack Roche
    Roche pleaded guilty to planning a terrorist act. He had planned to use homemade bombs to target the Israeli Embassy in Canberra.

    "Tony Abbott raises Australia’s terror threat to high"

    Tony Abbott raises Australia’s terror threat to high SEPTEMBER 12, 2014 news.com.au

    "This is a wonderful multicultural society we have."  Queensland Premier Campbell Newman said it was not about religion but about people involved in criminal acts.
    Logan mosque targeted with anti-Muslim pamphlets, sparking fears of violence..ABC By Leonie Mellor SEPTEMBER 13, 2014

    Oxford Dictionary Definition of terrorism:
    The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
    Oxford Dictionary Definition of crime:
    An action or omission which constitutes an offence and is punishable by law:
    shoplifting was a serious crime.

    "The National Terrorism Threat Level for Australia is PROBABLE. Credible intelligence, assessed by our security agencies indicates that individuals or groups have developed both the intent and capability to conduct a terrorist attack in Australia."

    The radicalisation and recruitment of Australians is increasing.  National Terrorism Threat Advisory System, 12-8-2016

    Afghanistan's dwindling Sikh, Hindu communities flee new abuses, Reuters, KABUL | BY HAMID SHALIZI, Jun 22, 2016

    "Obama described how he has watched Indonesia gradually move from a relaxed, syncretistic Islam to a more fundamentalist, unforgiving interpretation; large numbers of Indonesian women, he observed, have now adopted the hijab, the Muslim head covering...... 
    "Early on, Obama saw Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, the president of Turkey, as the sort of moderate Muslim leader who would bridge the divide between East and West—but Obama now considers him a failure and an authoritarian, one who refuses to use his enormous army to bring stability to Syria." 

    The Obama Doctrine: The U.S. president talks through his hardest decisions about America’s role in the world. By JEFFREY GOLDBERG, The Atlantic, APRIL 2016

    What we in the Western Democracies are confronting is in essence an internal crises of significant difference in ethics-values-beliefs as sociology-anthropology developed notions of differing worldviews having equal status-access to societal space despite certain cultures having inherent sociopathy regards Other and women. Where the ideology and development process which informs systemic violence against Other and women cannot be challenged in fact those doing so are either criminalised or at the very least labeled as evil  suffering from mental illness with efforts to have such objectors socially shamed and shunned takes place, even blamed for inciting the very terror-genocide to which their culture is subject. 


    "The use of force and violence is more commonplace and prevalent in some families, communities, religions, cultural/ethnic groups and societies based on the views and values about adult prerogatives with children espoused. They may also be based upon the sociopathy of the perpetrators." Treatment of Complex Trauma Courtois/Ford @2016

    Sociopathy groups of people who adopt belief systems which cause them to behave in a similar fashion.

    ..it is not aggression which moves armies it is devotion, moreover what brings about such conflicts at its most fundamental level are irreconcilable values, perceptions of a radical different nature, what brings these things about actually is a form of discourse, sometimes we call it propaganda but whatever it is legions are moved by words and symbols… more than the devil made me do it, or instinctually I am like that, people do not go to war because of their evolutionary history they go to war for statable discoverable reasons bound up with politics and culture, civilisation, religious and moral values.. great variety of factors that incline whole peoples to warfare he establishes that these factors are deeply embedded in culture and cultural differences create other differences… 
    The lamp of history illuminates what is beyond the readers desk, the readers village the ocean which surround the readers nation. When properly constructed the lamp of history, the study of history, illuminates the very commonalities that constitute human nature itself, what is taught is this wherever you find human beings these lessons are lessons worth learning and no matter how different the language or the culture or the customs or the diet there is a root humanity that is reached by such events that will allow us to predict how we are likely to behave under certain conditions and how those conditions therefore should either be promoted or shunned depending upon whether our behaviour is to be laudable or reprehensible.. .. the cause of war, the casus belli, is a complex of conflicting aspirations, someone is trying to achieve something, some group of people are trying to achieve something, and prepared to risk life and limb to do it and to have others die for it.” 
    Professor Daniel N. Robinson, Oxford University, Author of An Intellectual History of Psychology.

    The objectors to the nature of women's condition are told they are bigots and need to 'understand' why the culture acts the way it does, and western ethical-beliefs will in time change their ways - be 'reformed' - being the same logic as being told a Nazi throwing a gas canisters into concrete showers needs 'understanding' and one must wait until the full glory of Western Modernity ethics-beliefs seeps through and all will be well - its a load of BS for there is absolutely no constructed argument to determine how this 'reform' will be attained given there have been calls from individuals both from the culture itself and Other for it to do so for centuries, also there is not argument at all defending why meantime we should even accept victims of such a culture to continue to be thrown in front of us nor how long this 'reform' even if it is possible would take.

    The whole approach is based upon false assumptions firstly we are all human therefore we should all get along, culture determines this an impossibility as clearly history has shown and research into the nature of interactions between various groups imbued with significantly differing values - sacred values, it is simply not going to happen has never happened. Either one will remain in societal space or the other as Lincoln rightly determined.

    Culture, of course, is related to violence in general and not only to structural violence. For example, culture influences the determination of "thresholds" which pressure on a person must overcome in order to move that person from being controllable, or even positive, to being negative (that is, into violence)." The Culture of Violence, Chp 3. On the relationship between violence and culture - Galtung's concept


    "Without the ceaseless pulsating heartbeat of our categorization engine, we would understand nothing around us, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action.
    …..
    every culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic labels that come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and entities"
    SURFACES AND ESSENCES, ANALOGY AS THE FUEL AND FIRE OF THINKING, Douglas Hofstadter (American professor of cognitive science), Emmanuel Sander (French Psychologist-Developmental Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, Educational Psychology), 2013

    ".a cluster of friends or fellow travellers may come to hold sacred values, perhaps initially  influenced by one or a few of them, and then fuse into an imagined family-like group  defined and driven by these values. Furthermore, when sacred values are at the core of motivations to make extreme sacrifices, it becomes clear how people can sustain commitment and continue to fight. This result is so even when most of the group they were fused with has perished,."
    Devoted actors sacrifice for close comrades and sacred cause
    Scott Atrana,1, Hammad Sheikhb, and Angel Gomezc aCNRS-Institut Jean Nicod, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 75005 Paris, France; bDepartment of Psychology, New School for Social Research, New York, NY 10011; and cFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, 28040 Madrid, Spain

    Also there is an assumption religious ideologies in particular operate under the 'Golden Rule', 'Do unto Others as you would do unto yourself' & Love they Neighbor as thyself & Do not harm innocents, despite clear significant differences to other ideologies be they religious or secular of sacred values which would predict, as mere empirical observation provides evidence for, Other, neighbor, innocent in certain cultural categorisation engines within cultural codex are so circumscibed as to be not like me at all, non-human -ape, evil, not a neighbor nor innocent. Clearly religions as any secular ideology can and do inform infamy against humanity to claim this is not the case has to be a regarded as a severe psychological delusional state for the evidence across history to this very day informs us otherwise. The following quote is an example of such delusion underwriting a policy which refuses to hold the Islamic/Muslim culture culpable for its systemic crimes crimes against Other and women. 

    "In all the monotheism faiths we taught to love one another. That is what God wants. Not bashing one another" said one facebooker 
    2015

    "It’s war, we don’t have to be afraid to say this … a war of interests, for money, resources. I am not speaking of a war of religions. Religions don’t want war. The others want war.”"
    The Pope’s comments on Fr Hamel’s murder were very mysterious-Does the Holy Father believe that ISIS is really a front for something else?, Catholic Herald, by Fr Alexander Lucie-Smith, 29 Jul 2016

    Jesus (Matthew):
     “.. 34 Do not think that I have come to send peace on earth: I did not come to send peace, but a sword. 35 For I have come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. 36 And a man's foes shall be those of his own household."

    391 AD:
    “Theophilus Patriarch of Alexandria released his monks to attack pagans who had occupied the Serupium, temple to Serapis, centre of an important library and lecture halls the museion, academy of arts and sciences founded in the 3rd century BC by King Ptolemy I. The Monks attacked the pagans, the argument was the pagans were secretly worshiping in underground sanctuaries, and this was against the laws recently passed by the Emperor Theodosius I.

    The pagans objected and occupied the Serupium and the museion to protect them and the monks and a large Christian crowds, really a rabble, it would be equivalent to the old mob in the early Roman Empire. They stormed into these buildings smashing the statues, destroying the papyrus scrolls then the fighting spread across the city of Alexandria. Of course the Imperial army did nothing the population was maddened over the issue. They broke in carted off the cult statues to be melted down, they were turned into cookery, they were turned them into liturgical objects, for the use by Christians. Cult statues such as the great phallus of Priapus one of the famous fertility Gods was paraded around and cast into the streets as an absolutely disgusting idol Christians would have nothing to do with.

    The result of this attack on the Serupium and museion was that classical Alexandria was essentially destroyed and Christian Alexandria emerged. Scholars and popular writers have viewed this destruction as a turning point, and there is a good reason to do so, the pagans that witnessed it, witnessed this destruction were absolutely intimidated and there are reports of conversions on the spot.

    The Christian mob led by the monks destroyed these cult statues, nothing had happened. In addition the entire action although not ordered by the Imperial Government certainly the Emperor Theodosius I approved. And it is the climax to a series of legislation issued by Theodosius I who came to the throne in 379 AD who would forever ban the pagan sacrifices and also impose unity in the Imperial church.  .. The Christians finally destroyed the pagan sanctuaries, where essentially between 391-414 wiped out that elite class that provided the neo-platonic philosophers.”

    The Fall of the Pagans and the Origins of Medieval Christianity, Professor Kenneth W. Harl

    And before this were any Christians with Roman/Greek supporters who were even teaching Christians in their own Platonic schools, in Roman armies dying for the Emperor-Roman culture, determining Christians as a culture peaceful and only seeking friendship and harmony with Other-pagans? After this what happened and how is this any different to a Islamic/Muslim culture exhibiting exactly the same behavior regards Other-pagans now? And importantly what evidence have you that the methodology of imposition will not be the same, the outcome in time as we see being played out in the Turkey purge will not be in time the same? Avoidance when so much is at stake is really a good strategy for such a  conflict. And clearly the bloody bodies in our streets determine it a inter-cultural conflict for control of space political/social.
    Why should Other-Pagans determine the following statements with any less disgust given the reality, the bloody bodies in the streets, the significantly different political/social paradigms being imposed and attempted to be imposed upon humanity

    391AD Christian Mother and Father of man killed fighting in Roman army abuse Alexandria Egyptian Other-pagan questioning Christian loyalty.


    2016 Muslim Mother and Father of man killed fighting in Western army abuse Western Other-pagan for questioning Muslim loyalty.


    particularly with the Muslim statement as the son was killed as a direct consequence of his own and parents cultures inherent terror-genocide construct? One or more acts of individual bravery in an Other army will not stop the terror-genocide emanating from the Muslim culture to kill its own as it did not stop the destruction of the Roman/Greek pagan civilisation
    .

    Please Explain: Nazi (Hitler-Mein Kampf) & Muslim (Mohammed-Quran) Cultural Codex Construct of Other. Why it is One Is and One Is-Not. Yet both = "I don't mean participated, I mean observed."


    M
    ohammed Quran006.049 But those who reject our signs,- them shall punishment touch, for that they ceased not from transgressing. 

    008,012 Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them.

    003.028 Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from God…

    003.004 Then those who reject Faith in the Signs of God will suffer the severest penalty, and God is Exalted in Might, Lord of Retribution."

    2015 AD:
    "Enough is enough. It is time to speak out. 

    “Islam is innocent” is an incomplete sentence. Introspection is needed, for, if we shy away from reality, the alternative will be more images like those we witnessed last Tuesday night, when brave Lt. Muath Al Kasasbeh was burnt to death in a cage. 

    The inconvenient truth that is overlooked or willfully ignored by apologists for the indefensible is the fact that Wahabism, the cult of mediaeval austerity founded by Ibn Abdul Wahab (1703-1792), has over the last half century been exported to every mosque and school throughout the Muslim world until it completely enveloped mainstream Sunni Islamic teachings. 

    Wahabism has entirely replaced, and become, Sunni Islam; the two cannot be told apart anymore. Some Wahabist teachings, which have permeated the air we breathe in the Muslim world, are simply irreconcilable with decent human values, especially the ones that declare that every non-Wahabist is a disposable body whose bloodletting is unproblematic."
    ‘We have a problem’ by Zaid Nabulsi The Jordan Times Feb 10, 2015

    "Intellectuals from Saudi Arabia and Jordan to Egypt and Morocco are slamming Muslim leaders and clerics for ignoring the problems of Muslim society and dismissing terror attacks with faulty platitudes such as the oft-repeated, “Not in Islam’s name.”
    Another Saudi journalist, Muhammad Aal Al-Sheikh, argues in the daily Al-Jazirah that groups like IS are a faithful representation of Islamic texts that are no longer relevant today and for that reason Muslim law urgently needs updating.

    “We cannot dismiss their actions by saying that they ‘do not represent Islam’ when most of their actions originate in books from our past heritage, [books] that dealt with matters of the day in accordance with the conditions and norms of that period, which are different from the conditions and norms of our own period,” he writes.

    Writing that global Islam is mired in a “culture of ignorance, backwardness, and violence,” and that the “Arab world is rife with tyranny, poverty, death,” Al-Sheikh called for a “historic reconciliation between Islamic heritage and modern democracy.”"

    Muslim Writers: Islam To Blame For Global Terror by DEBORAH DANAN
    , 30 Jul 2016

    The trouble is systems to change 'fundamentally' actually require the internal constructs to enable it to do so otherwise such a hope is a dangerous one indeed for humanity inclusive of adherents themselves, for even if it was possible which frankly given there is no strategy for doing so Other than continued calls of the 'good' either that the behavior are not reflective of the 'real' Islamic/Muslim culture with terror-genocide increasing not diminishing after each pronouncement, or increasing claims even by Muslims the behavior are reflective of Islamic/Muslim ethics-values-beliefs-methods “the reexamination of religious (Islamic/Muslim) texts” and “revoking the religious legitimacy of interpretations of religious texts permitting ‘killing in the name of God. Those texts and their interpretations..., requiring urgent “criticism, dismantling, additions, omissions," subsequently fails to detail how this can in reality be achieved - anyone can make these claims as to the truth the Islamic/Muslim culture are indeed responsible for terror-genocide against Other and always have been, accepting the statements as proof things will change, the Islamic/Muslim culture will change as a result is simply dangerous delusion give the history of such calls by individuals and groups in the past determining such views as to the innocence of the Islamic/Muslim culture or the necessity for Islamic/Muslim codex and cultural change have clearly failed. Good intentions will not save us as they never have before under the exact same paradigm.

    It is also an invalid argument that 'modernity' determines any ideological abstract cultural codex (textual and exemplar (messianic) templates) invented by humans in the 'past' as 'no longer relevant today' for this present moment of time, nor is the claim such political/social abstracts determined in the past as they necessarily have to be relate to "conditions and norms of that (past) period, which are different from the conditions and norms of our own period,”  and therefore have no right to be analogised into time and space to inform behavior individual/group institutional in the present. Such an argument can be simply turned to determine all political/social abstracts void for any political/social abstract defining human relationships/behaviors, they are all mere inventions how ever well intended to form societies.

    History and even in our own times shows us the folly of depending upon anyone's version of 'modernity' as it moves along as 'the' template, for all you are doing is seeking to replace one invention with another and as we have seen 'old' so called non-modernity abstract Islamic/Muslim inventions have even been tacked onto the 'modern' "norms of our own period" UN Human Rights charter - why not be honest if you believe the political/social construct you adhere to is in your view dangerous to humanity and even the adherents themselves change inventions. For tinkering with a cultural construct will not change the core attributes which have led to terror-genocide emanating from the culture in the first 
    place if there are no internal abstracted justified and authorised means of doing so and why should you or humanity wait while the bloody body count rises?

    And
     so it comes to pass ''for all who take the sword will perish by the sword as after they have slain Other they to in turn will be determined by such a codex as Other.' as we can see still in our streets 'monotheism faiths .. bashing one another' along with Other-pagans for not accepting as 'truth', divine dictate, significantly different ethics-morals-beliefs-motivation and methodology. So what inevitably happens, is happening? Am I a bigot, racist for demanding the culture be held to account to stop their altruistic enforcers/punishers increasingly as they have in the past appearing in humanities streets?

    "Not surprisingly, religions tend to increase intolerance only when they are dominant."
    People’s opium? Religion and economic attitudes, Luigi Guisoa, Paola Sapienzad, Luigi Zingalese, 2002

    "Not surprisingly, religions tend to increase intolerance only when they are dominant." and there is no indication prior of building acts of terror determined a 'few' which does not portend worse to come?

    No indication before the holocaust gets into full swing evidence of a culture's altruistic enforcers/punishers in the streets beginning on the well recognised road, recognised by those who have taken the trouble to challenge their sacred assumptions and check again the historic/social/psychological record/research? A cultural codex and dense network system which will prevent any 'reform' you believe will or actually does despite the evidence seek peace and harmony where such a culture becomes dominant in time by whatever means informs a diametrically opposed outcome? Obama is mistaken regards Indonesian and Turkish political/social regression in modernity terms? 


    “ Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached. ”
    The passage originally appeared in the "Dialogue Held With A Certain Persian, the Worthy Mouterizes, in Anakara of Galatia written in 1391 as an expression of the views of the Byzantine emperor Manuel II Paleologus, one of the last Christian rulers before the Fall of Constantinople to the Muslim Ottoman Empire, on such issues as forced conversion, holy war, and the relationship between faith and reason.”


    Yet the reality of what certain 'monotheism faiths' categorisation engines inform, as for goodness sake we see examples of throughout history each and every day, is quite different and the 'sacred word' determines Other is not deserving of the same treatment as I, neighbor-innocent not being of the 'faith' are neither.

    Please Explain: Nazi (Hitler-Mein Kampf) & Muslim (Mohammed-Quran) Cultural Codex Construct of Other. Why it is One Is and One Is-Not. Yet both = "I don't mean participated, I mean observed."


    "Additional research suggests that negative information may more easily generalize to the outgroup (Paolini, Harwood, & Rubin, 2010). Our studies suggest that negative expectations prevent positive contact from leading to more favorable outgroup attitudes."
    Positive Expectations Encourage Generalization From a Positive Intergroup Interaction to Outgroup Attitudes, September 24, 2014, Matthew P. Deegan, Eric Hehman, Samuel L. Gaertner, and John F. Dovidio 


    "'Religion and Violence. Paradoxes of Religious Communication' argues that violence in religious systems is present in at least three forms: It is inherent to communication with the ‘‘sacred,’’ it is generated by processes of inclusion and exclusion, shaping religiously interpreted lifeworlds, and it is motivated or moderated by the respective semantics of religious narratives. The paper concludes that violence as a moment of hierophany (manifestation of the sacred ) is constitutive for the living experience in religious systems and cannot be eliminated entirely by moderating semantics."
    'Religion and Violence. Paradoxes of Religious Communication', Ilja Srubar, 2016

    "Baron and Spranca 1997; Fiske and Tetlock 2002; Tetlock 2003) suggests that people resist attempts to compromise sacred values no matter the cost to themselves or others. In the last decade or so, experimental work that goes beyond the morality of fairness and harm suggests that religious and transcendental beliefs consolidate “community” (Rozin et al. 1999), lead to “binding” (Graham et al. 2011), provide “unity motivation” (Ray and Fiske 2011), and mobilize parochial altruists, such as suicide bombers, to give their lives for the group (Ginges, Hansen, and Norenzayan 2009; cf. Atran 2003). .......
    Sacred values are nonnegotiable preferences whose defense compels actions beyond evident reason, that is, regardless of calculable costs and consequences (Ginges et al. 2007). Identity fusion occurs when personal and group identities collapse into a unique identity to generate a collective sense of invincibility and special destiny (Swann et al. 2012). These two programs account for different aspects of intractable intergroup conflicts; however, here and in a companion article (Sheikh, Gómez, and Atran 2016), we argue that sacred values and identity fusion interact to produce willingness to make costly sacrifices for a primary reference groups even unto death, that is, sacrificing the totality of self-interests. "
    The Devoted Actor, Unconditional Commitment and Intractable Conflict across Cultures, by Scott Atran Current Anthropology Volume 57, Supplement 13, June 2016

    "Religious people trust others more, trust the government more, are less willing to break the law, and believe more in the fairness of the market, but they are more intolerant and they have less progressive attitudes toward women... the characteristics that make somebody attend religious services on a regular basis also make her more intolerant toward immigrants and people of other races. Even if religious people are more intolerant because of personal characteristics, it is hard to imagine that a community that attracts the intolerant would not breed further intolerance.....
    The relation between religion and intolerance seems to be present in all religious denominations, both for religious upbringing and for attendance at religious services. Only Buddhists are more tolerant. The point estimates for Protestants and Catholics are very similar, while those of Muslims are much higher, and those of Hindus even higher. Actively religious Hindus are 29 percent more intolerant than non-religious people, Muslims 19 percent, actively religious Protestant and Catholics 7 percent more.
    .. religious people of all denominations (except Buddhists) are more inclined to believe that people in need are lazy and lack will power. The effect is somewhat stronger for Protestants than for Catholics.
    . Not surprisingly, religions tend to increase intolerance only when they are dominant."

    People’s opium? Religion and economic attitudes, Luigi Guisoa, Paola Sapienzad, Luigi Zingalese, 2002

    intolerant: not tolerant of views, beliefs, or behaviour that differ from one's own.
    synonyms: bigoted, narrow-minded, small-minded, parochial, provincial, insular, blinkered, illiberal, inflexible, dogmatic, rigid, uncompromising, unforgiving, unsympathetic

    My view is there is a fatal assumption inherent in Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (‘UDHR”) and it is this.


    Also from our own rational systems of development we believe we will be able to 'rationally' come to an understanding with other cultures about the error of their 'sacred values' and the benefit of our own yet the very sociology-anthropology paradigm determines these worldviews can be significantly different and in essence it is about managing significant difference not seeking resolution to lead to a peaceful harmonious societal space which significant values difference preclude from occurring. Instead we are to 'grow confidently' with another's cultures terror-genocide and oppression of women.

    We are to accept as a part of the multiculturalism para
    digm underwritten be generation of insane sociologists we must accept endemic social hostility for a 'drink of mint tea and Turkish pita' , and to underline the kafkaesque nature of our circumstance its Western Other cultures fault as they are not integrating the Muslim culture into Western culture where by mere observation of not only the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex, it is forbidden unless for necessity reasons to have anything to do with Other, Islamic/Muslim leaders are proclaiming fatwas, directive, ruling on a point of Islamic law given by a recognized authority, such as the fatwa in Sydney Australian which stipulated Muslims must follow the Islamic/Muslim cultures codex sacred value direction Muslims should have little or nothing to do with Other. 

    Is it any wonder  the "Outplayed: Regaining Strategic Initiative in the Gray Zone" report sponsored by the Army Capabilities Integration Center in Coordination with Joint Staff J-39/Strategic Multi-Layer Assessment Branch 
    reveals the reality which has led inexorably to WWI. WWII, "profound and paralyzing risk-confusion" regards enemy cultures utilising "combinations of influence, intimidation, coercion, and aggression. At the same time,.. exploiting, free-riding on, or are propelled by the generalized erosion or outright failure of traditional political authority." the same elite philosophy driven policy of appeasement of enemy cultures, determining well constructed argument under a Western rationale model will surely convince internal cultures tearing societies apart and external cultures battering Western democratic walls to accept the obvious benefits of the Western Worldview.

    "We have to grow with the threat, and we have to do it in a confident manner,” Professor Siracusa said. (Human Security and International Diplomacy)
    Two Sydney schools in lockdown as police unions call for support against extremists 
    SBS 20 OCT 2015

    "We have to stop with this debate of neutrality and secularity in Belgium and recognise and accept our multicultural society in all its manifestations. Not just when we want to drink mint tea or eat Turkish pita." sociologist Corinne Torrekens, a specialist in Muslim communities at the Free University of Brussels."
    Terror sparks integration debate in France, Belgium, DW, Elizabeth Bryant, Molenbeek/Sevran, 05.04.2016

    "It's not a question of Muslims being integrated, it's that society isn't integrating Muslims," says Alexandre Piettre, a sociologist at the Societies, Religions and Secularism Group, a Paris-based think-tank.

    Terror sparks integration debate in France, Belgium, DW, Elizabeth Bryant, Molenbeek/Sevran, 05.04.2016


    Feminist Swedish Politicians Defends Migrant Rapists, ‘Worse’ When Western Men Do It by LIAM DEACON, 5 Jul 2016

    Such
    approach of a perception of common human rationality ignores a truth cultures imbue us with differing reactive tendencies regards perceived transgression against 'sacred values' correlated positively I would argue with the relative draconian nature of our codex and an inherent inability to even have a 'rational' discussion regards 'irrational' constructs-unable to be justified by empirical evidence i.e the subjugation of women to man's 'leadership' and sexual control.


    "I am stunned to learn this," said Imtiaz Khan, a leader of the Awami League's Dhaka chapter and deputy secretary-general of the Bangladesh Olympic Committee.

    "My son used to pray five times a day from a young age. There is a mosque just 25 feet from our home. He started going to prayers with his grandfather. But we never imagined this. There was nothing at home, no books or anything to indicate he was leaning that way."
    Bangladesh attack: Shock over 'elite' Holey Cafe suspects BBC, 5-7-2016

    "..children raised in religious households, who are perceived to be more empathetic and sensitive to justice, are in fact less altruistic to their own class mates .... children from religious households also differ in their ratings of deserved punishment for interpersonal harm (F(2, 847) = 5.80, p < 0.01, h2 = 0.014); this was qualified by significantly harsher ratings of punishment by children from Muslim households than children from non-religious households (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between children from Christian households and non-religious households.".
    The Negative Association between Religiousness and Children’s Altruism across the World, November 05, 2015

    "great emphasis placed on Muslims to see themselves as members of a community of true believers .., Muslims to see each other as part of a cohesive social whole .. deliberate individualism is seen as a threat to the order and coherence of society...parents devalue creativity as an important child quality.. intellectual autonomy and imagination ..a stumbling block toward the unconditional surrender required of pious Muslims." (Acevedo, Ellison, & Yilmaz, 2013)


    "The relation between religion and intolerance seems to be present in all religious denominations, both for religious upbringing and for attendance at religious services. Only Buddhists are more tolerant. The point estimates for Protestants and Catholics are very similar, while those of Muslims are much higher, and those of Hindus even higher. Actively religious Hindus are 29 percent more intolerant than non-religious people, Muslims 19 percent, actively religious Protestant and Catholics 7 percent more.
    . Not surprisingly, religions tend to increase intolerance only when they are dominant."

    People’s opium? Religion and economic attitudes, Luigi Guisoa, Paola Sapienzad, Luigi Zingalese, 2002

    Further
    we have the insidious how long is a piece of string marginalisation excuse for terror Other are to blame for their own demise clearly evidence exists each claim of marginalisation is contradicted by the reverse occurring. The reality comes back to the codex-development-status anxiety in a dense network where holding to the true-perfect believer status and the justified-authorised methodology framing behavior leads to heightened aggression. The fact is this as we all exist in what are hierarchical status based societies marginalisation is a fact of life for all of us, it will be found. That is not to argue marginalisation does not occur in an oppressive form but the point is relatively do Other cultures inform the same terror-genocide behavior if not marginalisation cannot be the core contributing factor.

    "Officials said some of the attackers came from wealthy families, having attended top schools or universities in Dhaka or Malaysia, and at least one was the son of a top politician."
    Dhaka gunmen were 'elite', 'educated' young men, RNZ, 7-5-2016

    "We
    find that aggression is generally not a maladjusted reaction typical of the socially marginal; instead, aggression is intrinsic to status and escalates with increases in peer status until the pinnacle of the social hierarchy is attained."
    R Faris, D Felmlee - American Sociological Review, 2011

    "The time has come for us to be honest with ourselves and indeed each other. The radicalisation that breeds terrorism is not conducted in the bush at night. It occurs in the full glare of day in homes, in madrasas and in mosques with rogue imams. We must ask the question — where are the parents and families (communities, education and religious institutions) of those who are being radicalized?" said Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenya's president "Our task of countering terrorism has been made all the more difficult by the fact that the planners and financiers of this brutality are deeply embedded in our communities."

    "A Garissa-based official said the government was aware Abdullahi, a former University of Nairobi law student, had joined the militant group al Shabaab after graduating in 2013."
    Kenya says son of a government official was among gunmen in Garissa attack 
    by EDITH HONAN GARISSA, Kenya — Reuters Published Sunday, Apr. 05 2015

    The following is what we are being asked to accept by our political/social elite and they are surprised-shocked large segments of their citizenry are searching for a way to bring peace and security back to their streets and hold these inept dangerous cultural gatekeepers to account for enabling the unleashing of a culture's terror-genocide into their societal space.

    ‘We cannot eliminate entirely the risk of terrorism any more than we can eliminate the risk of any serious crime.’ said Neville Chamberlain British Prime Minister in 1938 ‘Humanity simply have to make political concessions to cultures delivering terror-genocide against Other cultures, seek to understand and respect their ideology and ignore the bloody bodies and those missing in the streets and ‘grow confidently' with Nazi terror.’.

    "According to the Pew Research Center, religious hostilities reached a six-year high in 2012, with a third (33%) of countries in the high category, up from 20% just six years earlier.

    The Islamic world is disproportionately affected. More than one-in-two (57%) Muslim-majority countries have high religious hostilities, more than double that of other countries (25%), as shown in the chart to the left.

    Although religious hostilities affect countries throughout the world experience, Muslim-majority countries consistently have higher levels of a range of religious hostilities than other countries and by wide margins. For instance, Muslim-majority countries are more than three times more likely than other countries to have religion-related war, terror or sectarian violence"

    09/22/2014 Source data PEW Research Center - Commentary Weekly Number Brian J. Grim, Ph.D.

    You are asking fellow citizens to 'grow confidently' with such a cultures terror-genocide with political/social codex constructs clearly visible before us informing increased social hostility as it always has, 'accept our multicultural society as, designed by our university 'only ask the questions we allow you to' sociology departments, in all its manifestations inclusive of terror genocide and tragic outcomes for women because surely a 'drink of mint tea or Turkish pita is worth it' I for one believe such a request is sickening and dangerous. In fact I believe the contributors to the "Outplayed: Regaining Strategic Initiative in the Gray Zone" report determining the political/social elite as suffering from "profound and paralyzing risk-confusion"  is rather too generous.

    Clearly the policy is leading inexorably to the past terror-genocide in both directions as cultural gatekeepers imprisoned by an abstract utopian view of society attempts to destroy their own cultures heritage values-beliefs and methodology and accept endemic terror-genocide in both directions as the price their citizens pay for the privilege, seeking to blame anyone except themselves for the broken bodies and lives in their streets. How the 'good' enforce so effectively the 'Tranquillity of Silence' and lead humanity in the appeasement of cultures of infamy into hell once again. 

    “Extremist groups, whatever their orientation, are gaining ground in Germany,” Thomas de Maiziere, the interior minister, said.
    “Security forces observed not just a rise in membership but also an increase in violence and brutality.”

    Extremist violence increasing in Germany, warns report,  The Telegraph, Justin Huggler, berlin, 28 JUNE 2016


    And why is this the case it is because the Western cultural gatekeepers under dangerous assumptions all cultures inform the same inherent risk and the altruistic enforcers of a culture are 'sick' criminals not what they really are cultural agents has allowed and continues to do so a culture with an inherent cultural codex terror-genocide construct within their societies to inform the inevitable.

    Islamist extremists hide huge stockpile of weapons near German mosque, Express, By KATIE MANSFIELD, Jun 29, 2016

    This is a culture where inevitably the adherents are the victims and perpetrators from the same family as both utilise the exact same cultural codex where both will always exist in the same behavoral variance generation after generation. You subject your children to such obvious heinous contrusts regards Other what do you think will happen?

    Istanbul attack: Tunisian killed 'searching for IS-linked son', BBC, 30/6/2006

    A War of Brothers in Iraq: ‘I Will Kill Him With My Own Hands’, NYT, By TIM ARANGO and FALIH HASSAN, JUNE 18, 2016

    Saudi Twins Allegedly Murdered Mother After Being Stopped From Joining ISIS

    World | Reuters | Updated: July 06, 2016

    Each in turn will be found wanting along with Other, humanity really wants to retain such a ethic-belief methodology recipe for tragedy in our midst to continue to inform the same?

    To whom it may concern: Time for a Royal Commission to determine if it is possible for the Islamic/Muslim culture to ‘reconcile itself with modernity' so as to prevent terror-genocide against Other cultures



    ".. the character of society flows from the intellectual forms which predominate in it."
    A Dictionary of Sociology, Oxford UNiversity Press, 2009


    "..forms and consequences of the development of the modern state system, its political
    and (international) legal forms of organisation and the intellectual forms in which it is reflected."

    War, the State and International Law in Seventeenth-Century Europe, Olaf Asbach, Peter Schröder, 2010


    'The culture industry intentionally integrates its consumers (citizens) from above.' utilising cultural "intellectual forms" which "predominate in" societal space, subject to adaptation relative to the political/social power each cultural "intellectual form" are able to impose on the Other, the '..culture industry undeniably speculates on the conscious and unconscious state of the millions towards which it is directed, the masses are not primary, but secondary, they are an object of calculation; an appendage of the machinery. The customer (citizen) is not king, as the culture industry would have us believe, not its subject but its object.'. As relative cultural social/political power temporally changes so does the negotiated hybrid "intellectual form" reflected in state systems and policy.
    Adapted from THEODOR ADORNO, "The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture", London: Routledge, 1991

    In other words those promising Sharia law or any other Islamic/Muslim construct will never be reflected within a Western Democratic state systems or policy are lying if they allow the Islamic/Muslim "intellectual form"  to remain in societal private and public spheres. It is a promise which they can never fulfill, and if one looks out into societal space the cultural norms an anathema to notions of Modernity developed Liberty and Equality are already stalking the streets with bloody bodies already evidence of the cultural methodology to be utilised to leverage political 
    power.

    "Muslim communities in Australia have been quietly practising sharia law in negotiating divorces, disadvantaging women in custody and property arrangements."
    Sharia law used to settle divorces in Muslim community, The Australian, JACQUELIN MAGNAY, GINA RUSHTON, December 23, 2015

    "Two Sydney children have been placed into foster care and their 17-year-old brother reluctantly permitted to live with his violent father after their Lebanese-born mother cited “Islamic law” as the reason she was unable to care for them."
    Sharia law ‘affecting court rulings’, REBECCA URBAN, The Australian, September 5, 2016

    "..The Australian also reported Muslim families have been requesting the Family Court authorise agreements based on sharia principles rather than Western law."

    Susie O’Brien: Worrying signs sharia law is creeping inSusie O’Brien, Herald Sun, September 5, 2016