Featured Post

How Do You Stop a Future Terrorist When the Only Evidence Is a Thought? Wrong Question. First realise the 'Thought' is not their own it is their cultures.

A person, group, community, society and the cultures from which they are derived should never be judged and dealt with based upon ethic...

Thursday, December 1, 2016

United for our security? German mole a self 'radicalised' Islamist - So self-invented ethics-values-beliefs-motivation?

United for our security?
2016-Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz-
"'We are evidently dealing with a case in which a person radicalised himself undetected within his personal surroundings,' Hans-Georg Maassen told dpa of the 51-year-old."
German mole a self 'radicalised' Islamist, Skynews, 1 December 2016

The 'undetected' not in anyway culturally primed by infant-child-adolescent-adult normative cultural codex-development process, aggregately applicable to all adherents across the entire cultural behavioural variance, of prior exposure to clearly identifiable textual-exemplar categorisation of the opponent-Other you & fellow Other citizens?

What is missing from the following argument? "Ohio State stabber 'inspired' by ISIS and Al-Qaeda-FBI" NYT, By MITCH SMITH and RICHARD PÉREZ-PEÑA, 30-11-2016

Could it be there are many 'inspirational' cultural altruistic swords from the seventh century to now left off the list and secondly who-what continues to 'inspire' the 'inspired' or are they all "self 'radicalised' Islamists" who have ethic-morals-values-beliefs-motivation social/political methodology completely severed from ethic-morals-values-beliefs-motivation social/political methodology of the very families/communities/institutions from which they continually walk to be able to be determined not integrally-necessarily-systemically of the culture which actually primed them to do what they do so well?

Undetected? So a known adherent to a cultural codex which clearly informs terror-genocide and tragic misogynistic consequences for women within its behavioural variance wherever it sets foot, where it is understood through research cultures-ideologies comprise clusters of interlinked ethics-values-beliefs method which cannot exist contradictory of each other can now under the Elizabethan-Panopticon elite’s ‘not culture’ paradigm be determined as undetected.

United for our security? To claim such a thing whilst lying about cause, the actual Islamic/Muslim normative codex-exemplar template & development process, is informing what increasingly in our streets – security?

Culture-ideology creates terrorists and Culture is therefore culpable. Terrorists are a cultural altruistic enforcement-conversion tool systemically created by the ‘good’ many as their social/political world vision is significantly different than Other, dealing with the terrorist symptoms of culture as the ‘sick’ or generic criminals simply enables the culture to adapt as each new policy ‘cure’ is applied.

If you can establish the ethics-values- etc held by the ‘self-radicalised’ are in no way underwritten by the Islamic/Muslim codex/development process i.e. even aggregate cultural parenting style then of course I am wrong and this ‘undetected’ of course ‘self-radicalised’ without any external cultural normative codex-exemplar schema/priming and you Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz are indeed United for our security
.

How Do You Stop a Future Terrorist When the Only Evidence Is a Thought? Wrong Question. First realise the 'Thought' is not their own it is their cultures.

Please Explain: Nazi (Hitler-Mein Kampf) & Muslim (Mohammed-Quran) Cultural Codex Construct of Other. Why is it One Is and One Is-Not When both = "I don't mean participated, I mean observed."?

Wednesday, November 9, 2016

Trump Takes Florida, Closing In on a Stunning Upset

It appears bias is so endemic in the Sociological Imagination of the Elizabethan-Panopticon elite against the citizen-populist, as with Britex, the elites citizen-phobia creates a delusion their view is so obviously beneficial even the uneducated-populist-citizen will honestly espouse their actual views in survey’s the elite create to prove themselves right, not for once understanding the deviance paradigm for speaking ones true feelings as to the state of the world the Elizabethan-Panopticon elite have created means very few are really game to express their true position.

Tranquility of Silence so favoured by tyranny becomes resident even in our so called democracies where of course we can all ‘freely’ speak of our hopes for the future and the ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation and social/political methodology which are the foundation of those hopes without being deemed deviant, uneducated, white, racist, right-wing, bigot and threatened by public criminal and/or societal public systematized condemnation for being so impertinent.

Not.


Blasphemy against the sociological imagined delusions of the Western ‘Democratic’ elite where the citizen can no longer be trusted to make the ‘right’ decision even regards their own children’s and their future is punished. But of course the ‘right’ view is rewarded with medals and Australian of the Year and so the terror-genocide continues along with increasing subjugation and violence against women.

It is rather hypocritical of those accusing Trump of 'Hate' when they themselves wage abusive campaigns against fellow citizens being called a bigot, racist, White, suffering from mental illness, ... for holding differing views which on examination  actually have a right to be held given the terror-genocide these so called good have unleashed against fellow citizens.

"Hillary Clinton, by contrast, epitomizes the dorky arrogance and smugness of the professional elite. The dorkiness: the pantsuits. The arrogance: the email server. The smugness: the basket of deplorables. Worse, her mere presence rubs it in that even women from her class can treat working-class men with disrespect. Look at how she condescends to Trump as unfit to hold the office of the presidency and dismisses his supporters as racist, sexist, homophobic, or xenophobic."

What So Many People Don’t Get About the U.S. Working ClassJoan C. Williams, NOVEMBER 10, 2016

Saturday, October 29, 2016

Populism where the citizen becomes the enemy of the political elite’s dangerous sociological imagined abstractions

Paul Klee (1879-1940) -Dancing Under the Empire of Fear (1938)
Populism where the citizen becomes the enemy of the political elite’s dangerous sociological imagined abstractions which work wonderfully in an imagined space but fail miserably, violently in reality.

Populism as with neoliberalism are sociological imagined delusions based upon absurd extremes - unprovable assumptions-fantasies created to protect the egos of those who believe a socialist - multiculturalist model - a 'transcendent open' search in a non-earthly plane will deliver the absolute forms of "truth, beauty, goodness and unity", where we all simply hold hands stare deeply into each others eyes, and share out the goods equally will solve the world's problems - where at the same time we all hold our cultural world views as sacrosanct and utilise as we must earthly human derived codex and exemplar behaviors non-open preset systems political-economic-social to create inference, metaphor and analogies which bound our action/in-action and exclude or even terrorise Other. There is nothing new about this.


"The measures give the police extra powers to carry out searches and to place people under house arrest.

However an official inquiry found that the state of emergency was only having a "limited impact" on improving security."
Paris attacks: France state of emergency to be extended - PM Valls, BBC, 13/11/2016


I do wish the world was different but it is not, not every culture can be your friend or even wants to be. Believing surely the other culture will as a cultural whole, which in the end is really what drives outcomes not simply the 'good'-moderate at one end of the cultural behavioral variance will accept the merits of your culture in the same space when their cultural codex clearly determines and history they will not should be your guide to policy decision making not some sociological imagined transcendent form which works in a novel but not in reality.

Pope Francis has had to admit such an "open" vision has its limitations.

"..price to pay when imprudent calculations are made and a country takes in more than it can integrate."

Pope Francis asked, "What is the danger when a refugee or migrant is not integrated? He is ghettoized, that is, he enters a ghetto. And a culture that does not develop in relation with another culture, that is dangerous."
POPE: LIMIT NUMBER OF MIGRANTS, by Aaron Maxwell, Church Militant,  November 3, 2016

Damascus is a prime example of "a culture that does not develop in relation with another culture, that is dangerous." and this same culture is being imported by the millions into a Western Democratic space where research tells us the two world views are diametrically opposed - IS did not simply appear from nowhere in the Iraq-Syrian desert - it is a culture, the Muslim-Islamic culture, in the process of dealing with a cultural problem how to achieve its world view not yours. You really think defeat of IS will not increasingly inform schism in Western streets, and IS are not a red flag to tell you this is a certainty - revolutions go through heroic defeats ask Lenin, but as Lenin said this is nowhere near the end, the Islamic/Muslim cultural revolution against Western constructs will intensify.

What was the sociological imagined delusional view of Damascus before the conflagration:

“It (Damascus-Syria) has seen empires and tyrants come and go; it offers a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony. It is a wonderful city in which to be. …. a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony"
British Historian Dan Cruickshank BBC series "Cruickshank's Adventures in Architecture, Episode 5 - Connections, Syria, Damascus 2008, First aired on BBC Two in April 2008

The fact is, as it has always been, cultures with significant ethical-value-belief-motivation and methodology differences will in time tend to inform social schism in the same space, and with cultures who develop terror-genocide mind-sets within their adherents as the Islamic/Muslim culture does as we repeatedly see currently and across history for goodness sake it is inevitable.

"Germany will investigate all military recruits from July 2017 after its military counter-espionage service (MAD) identified 20 Islamists in the country's armed forces"

Germany investigates Islamists in army, news.com.au, NOVEMBER 6, 2016
Islamists Penetrate Western Security Servicesby Daniel Pipes, Jan 24, 2005, updated Oct 29, 2016

When two cultures merge in the same space the nature of one and its system strengths and methods of citizen alignment-punishment become increasingly analogised until they become the same. In the case of Western Modernity-Islamic/Muslim culture ‘blasphemy’ against the elites and attacking cultures ethos becomes method.


'our democratic scheme is at stake' Duncan Lewis - Imagine for Yourself the Images a Society Has Informed or Will Inform when a Society Accepts Blasphemy as a Normative Paradigm Within its Midst.

There is something much worse than ‘populism’, the citizens desire to hold onto their cultures ethics-values-beliefs-motivations and methodology, it’s the elites Elizabethan-Panopticon rising to define-categorise a plague emanating from citizens aspirations and to lock them in their cells with the very cause the elite itself unleashes the plague-cause upon citizens to suffer in the tranquility of silence or be punished-labelled-deviant and reap the reward for being so.

It is a state where Left wing becomes Right wing where definition of feminism, liberty, equality become simply subjective views from a kaleidoscope of cultural views where the unimaginable gradually, then with increasing momentum becomes the ‘norm’ we are to ‘grow confidently’ with terror-genocide as it is the ‘nature’ endemic in other ideological spaces which we must now share in our cells consoled by our ‘mint tea and Turkish pita’ or be determined deviant. Accept blame for our own fate via the sociological imagined marginalisation, neo-colonialism, uneducated-easily led,… where evidence to the contrary does not count for method and theory have become as per Chomsky superfluous – inconvenient-distractions from ‘reality’.

"We have to grow with the threat, and we have to do it in a confident manner,” Professor Siracusa said. (Human Security and International Diplomacy)Two Sydney schools in lockdown as police unions call for support against extremists SBS 20 OCT 2015

"We have to stop with this debate of neutrality and secularity in Belgium and recognise and accept our multicultural society in all its manifestations. Not just when we want to drink mint tea or eat Turkish pita." sociologist Corinne Torrekens, a specialist in Muslim communities at the Free University of Brussels."
Terror sparks integration debate in France, Belgium, DW, Elizabeth Bryant, Molenbeek/Sevran, 05.04.2016

"It's not a question of Muslims being integrated, it's that society isn't integrating Muslims," says Alexandre Piettre, a sociologist at the Societies, Religions and Secularism Group, a Paris-based think-tank.
Terror sparks integration debate in France, Belgium, DW, Elizabeth Bryant, Molenbeek/Sevran, 05.04.2016

Even those we previously determined as giving fair warning now joining the bigots the irrational attackers of ‘Freedoms’.

“Instead of responding to attacks against freedom of expression, voices were raised to decry blasphemy and to propose compromise with terrorism. There is no blasphemy in a democracy,” Mr. Rushdie said. ..

..the writer decried the reluctance of Western governments to use the words “Muslim” or “Islam,” preferring instead to attribute terrorist attacks to “unbalanced” people or to a generic thing like “radicalism” or “extremism,” even when the attackers themselves say Islam is their motive."

‘Satanic Verses’ author Salman Rushdie: ‘Today, I would be accused of Islamophobia, racism’ By Victor Morton - The Washington Times - Tuesday, September 6, 2016

Indeed Lincoln’s view of a Democracy turned into mere dangerous populism – fascism you are proposing yet you do it with such ‘good’ intentions it is redefined in such an imaginative way it is almost palatable.

‘It was one of Lincoln’s ways of working out his chief value to the country, and that value was his clear sense from the start it was our democratic scheme that was at stake, and that if it was to be saved, every citizen who could aid must help to give all that was in them.

Lincoln seems to have put it something like this to himself:

“Everybody in the country has had a part in bringing this thing about; everybody feels they have a right to say how things shall be handled; everybody that is worth their salt is going to exercise that right, and they are going to do it according to the kind of person they are – according to their temperament, their training, their self-control, their meanness, and their goodness. If we are going to put this thing through and prove that citizens can govern themselves, we must get from them what they can give, and we must let them give it in their own way.”
Source: The Life of Lincoln, Tachell

Of course I could be wrong these citizen Right wingers ‘populists’ have simply come into existence for no good reason i.e. there is not something just as ugly if not much worse being unleashed so nicely in their space.

"Plainly the sheep and the wolf are not agreed upon a definition of the word liberty.” ― Abraham Lincoln

So where have these modernity developed sociological imaginings fashioned by the well intentioned unchallengeable ‘good’ left us – in a very precarious dangerous place on many fronts.

"Outplayed: Regaining Strategic Initiative in the Gray Zone" report sponsored by the Army Capabilities Integration Center in Coordination with Joint Staff J-39/Strategic Multi-Layer Assessment Branch reveals the reality which has led inexorably to WWI. WWII, "profound and paralyzing risk-confusion" regards enemy cultures utilising "combinations of influence, intimidation, coercion, and aggression. At the same time,.. exploiting, free-riding on, or are propelled by the generalized erosion or outright failure of traditional political authority." the same elite philosophy driven policy of appeasement of enemy cultures, determining well-constructed argument under a Western rationale model will surely convince internal cultures tearing societies apart and external cultures battering Western democratic walls to accept the obvious benefits of the Western Worldview.

The Elizabethan-Panopticon rationally starts by seeking to keep the Islamic-Muslim plague in check utilising strong network systems reflective of the attacking cultures own strong network system of keeping their adherents in line utilising-relying upon the very attacking culture itself to protect the attacked culture -
how many times does history teach us such a strategy is doomed in time to failure:

"It was the authority he granted after Sept. 11, along with help from the Central Intelligence Agency, that allowed the city to turn its eyes on Muslim neighborhoods. Plainclothes officers lingered in coffee shops and halal delis, eavesdropping on conversations and noting the political opinions of owners and customers. They used informers to tape sermons and collected attendance lists at Muslim student groups. Detectives kept files on Muslims who changed their names and conducted long investigations into mosques, cases that put whole congregations under scrutiny for years but never led to charges against a mosque."

Judge Rejects Settlement Over Surveillance of Muslims by New York Police Department
By MATT APUZZO and ADAM GOLDMAN, OCT. 31, 2016

This is continually thwarted by the multicultural-religion paradigm which determines culture not responsible and therefore individuals with radical thoughts and behaviors are outlier criminals rather than a certain outcome derived from a cultural development-codex process which has always created via generic categories-concepts-definitions-inferences of Other which are understood across the whole breadth of the Islamic-Muslim cultural behavioral variance, terrorists from the described moderate Muslim families, communities and institutions as from the radical.

This has two disastrous effects firstly attacks by Muslims will increase, - against Other citizens and particularly the foot soldiers of the Elizabethan-Panopticon, enclaving will gather pace, physically, psychologically, secondly Other citizens realising the Islamic-Muslim plague instead of being stopped is simply being managed into their streets will begin to turn on the intellectual-political elite and their supporters utilising terror as a method.

The Elizabethan-Panopticon rises further continuing to deal with symptoms from both the Islamic/Muslim culture and citizens rightly angered by being subject to such kafkaesque insanity of the heinous ideological constructs of the Islamic/Muslim culture being unleashed in their space, to in time as it has elsewhere destroy their security and subvert their culture. Until as Lincoln said we either become one or the other as we cannot be both in the same space and by continuing to enable the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex to stay in societal private and public space, even encouraging such a diabolical ethic to do so increases the probability the Islamic/Muslim culture will dominate.

We know what happens then - you have to be completely dangerously deluded to believe what always happens elsewhere will somehow be different in your space, yet this is what sociological imagination has enabled.

"The
 French police have complained of being increasingly under attack -- from jihadists, ordinary criminals and hooded youths who have clashed with police during recent demonstrations over labour reforms." 
French police in life-threatening condition after Molotov cocktail attack, France24, 9-10-2016

This is what sociological imagination has created for us heaven/hell wrapped in the best of intentions by the 'good' as they shout from each new pile of corpses and demand women be free to be broken, subject to Mans leadership, bigot, racist, right wing, populist, love across at those deviants imbued with irrational fear objecting diminishingly as the 'good' system gains silence as it will unless..... 


“How can someone be capable of that?” she said
.Orlando Gunman’s Wife Breaks Silence: ‘I Was Unaware’, NTY, By ADAM GOLDMAN, NOV. 1, 2016


"How"? This is "How":
Islamic/Muslim cultural development-codex derived process-Islamic/Muslim categories-concepts-heuristics-reasoning-symbols-mental models-motivation - methods.= burning buildings, broken bodies and lives. This is "How" it has come to pass ever since Mohammad walked demented out of his cave and decided to define Other as:

'Deaf, dumb, and blind, fools, in utter darkness, deceive themselves, diseased, hangout with their evil ones, wander like blind ones, bartered Guidance for error, lost true direction, in utter darkness, make mischief therein and shed blood, transgressors, apes-animals, despised and rejected, ignorant, illiterates, do nothing but conjecture, seek gain in evil, God's curse is on them for their blasphemy, sold their souls, insolent, envious, wrong-doers, greedy, idolaters, perverse, buyers of (magic), they conceal, in schism, wrong, wicked, etc - and therefore justifiably destined for grievous harm or severest penalty-.to be smite above their necks and have all their finger tips cut off.'

It is appalling disingenuous of any person who has read the Quran to even infer they have no idea why Muslims continue to murder Other in the tradition of the Muslim exemplar Mohammad, author of such an ethical-belief text of hatred and motivator language of terror-genocide. This is the cause of Muslim terror the Islamic/Muslim codex construct of Other and Mohammad's exemplar behavior necessary because the ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation methodology of the Islamic/Muslim culture are so significantly different and oppressive to Other cultures in the same space, anything else are mere circumstance
.

"Cultural and social norms are highly influential in shaping individual behaviour, including the use of violence. Norms can protect against violence, but they can also support and encourage the use of it. For instance, cultural acceptance of violence, either as a normal method of resolving conflict or as a usual part of rearing a child, is a risk factor for all types of interpersonal violence. It may also help explain why countries experiencing high levels of one type of violence also experience increased levels of other types. Social tolerance of violent behaviour is likely learned in childhood, through the use of corporal punishment or witnessing violence in the family, in the media or in other settings."
Changing cultural and social norms that support violence, by World Health Organization - ‎2009

Note from the same report:
"Interventions that challenge cultural and social norms supportive of violence can help reduce and prevent violent behaviour. Although widely used, they have rarely been evaluated. Given the current weak evidence base, it is premature to review their effectiveness.

The fact is 'So what' if at the margins a few outliers can be turned if the cultural whole continues to deliver terror as research has determined "Cultures that favour violence breed violence." Clearly this is the case with the Islamic/Muslim culture why should humanity wait for a cure when there is none, simply a hope there may be?


Is just one child’s life worth the wait for such a delusion? For we are proposing a cure can be found  for a cultures world vision this is pure tragedy in the making as we can clearly see from the burning buildings, broken bodies and lives in humanities streets as well as the political/social cleansing of Other as in Turkey, Iran, etc. WHO are not proposing changing 'individuals', to have the policy work WHO are proposing changing a whole culture of billions.

A different view, you may be right.

Sunday, October 16, 2016

Bernard Gaynor x Army intelligence officer Australian Defence Force letter detailing his views on the security-political-social Diligence and Efficiency & Response

To Whom it May Concern

I (Bernard Gaynor x Army intelligence officer Australian Defence Force) don't normally email out the articles that I write. However, given events in recent days with the arrest of two teenagers in Sydney for planning yet another terrorist attack and revelations that Australia is the third-most targeted nation by the Islamic State, it is clear that we are facing an embryonic but growing Islamic insurgency.

Before I began working in the public sphere, I was an intelligence officer in the Australian Army. I was good at my job and I understand our intelligence community well. It completely fails to understand the threat that we face. 

My article today explains clearly the nature of this insurgency...


The threat we face
There is no doubt that Australia is facing an embryonic insurgency, driven by Islamic beliefs. This unfortunate and disturbing truth was highlighted once again with the recent arrest of two teenagers who police allege were planning an imminent beheading in Sydney.
In addition to this latest incident, we’ve seen in just the last few months:
  • Ihsas Khan attack and almost kill a Minto man in broad daylight in September. Khan was known by police and the attack occurred on the 15th anniversary of September 11.
  • Two backpackers were slain by Smail Ayad in August while he yelled ‘Allahu akbar’ in Home Hill.
  • The US Congress released a report in August showing that Australia was the third-top target for Islamic State terrorist attacks in the world, with eight planned or executed attacks since 2014. However, Australian media report that the number of attacks (planned or carried out) is even higher at fifteen.
  • Again in August, a Lakemba-based childcare network was raided amid concerns that it had siphoned off more than $27 million of taxpayer funds and sent them to the Islamic State.
The Australian government will rely heavily on advice from intelligence analysts as it develops strategies to counter this insurgency. And this advice will be based on an assessment of the threat, looking at its capability and intent.

All the available evidence shows that the Islamic insurgency in Australia has a low capability. The events of the past few days demonstrate this.In regards to the current capability of the threat, Australians can be confident that this advice will be sound. Australia’s intelligence agencies are very good at understanding capability and they have the means to monitor it closely, even if they cannot stop every attack.
The two teenagers were arrested after purchasing bayonets at a gun shop. One of them is the stepson of a convicted terrorist. They were arrested outside a mosque after conducting pre-attack rituals. And both of them were known to police for attempts to join Islamic terrorist groups overseas, refusing to stand during the national anthem at a school assembly and for carrying signs in public calling for beheadings.
In terms of a terrorist attack, the best description that can be given to this one is that it was a complete cluster. In fact, it is difficult to conceive how a planned attack could be any easier to detect and thwart.
There was no attempt at secrecy. There was no attempt to source weapons covertly. And the attack was to be launched from the most obvious place possible: a mosque. If this is the best effort that those involved in this embryonic insurgency can muster, then it will not go far.
However, even with this low level of capability, deadly terrorist attacks have occurred in Australia. Most of them have been conducted by those already on the radar of policing and security agencies. That they slipped through should be of great concern, demonstrating weaknesses on the security side rather than the strength of this insurgency.
However, those involved in this insurgency do not need a great capability to cause a fatal impact: all that is needed is a knife and a mobile phone.
So even with this low level of capability, the safety of Australians is largely dependent on the numbers game. Police and security agencies have already admitted that they do not have the resources to monitor all known threats. Safety cannot be guaranteed and the victims will be those unlucky enough to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.
That is going to be our future, even if threat capability does not increase. Most Australians would agree that this is not good enough, even if they will accept increasingly disruptive controls over ordinary aspects of life to counter a threat that is easily recognisable and allowed to continue operating largely unhindered in our midst. But if the government is not going to address this insurgency by targeting it at its source, then the consequence will be that the rest of us face ever more intrusive and disruptive security measures in an attempt to maintain public safety.
Unfortunately, one thing is almost certain: the capability of the threat will increase. Practice makes perfect and every failed attack will drive a learning cycle within the individuals and networks that form this insurgency. Furthermore, it is well-known that criminal organisations like outlaw motorcycle groups have seen a surge in Islamic membership. These organisations will develop threat capability, as will the return of hardened Islamic State veterans from Iraq and Syria. There is also an increasing risk that our own agencies will ‘grow’ capability through politically-correct recruitment programs.
Both Defence and the Australian Federal Police have made public commitments to recruit from the Islamic community. This is fraught with danger, posing a risk to morale and a reduction in our national capacity to monitor and counter threats, while providing opportunities for those involved in the insurgency to develop capability. And with a politically-driven imperative to increase Islamic recruitment, there can only be a corresponding drop in vetting standards.
Additionally, the capability of those involved in this insurgency in relation to supporting functions like recruitment and funding has already proven sophisticated and effective. One should plan for the ‘sharp end’ of the insurgency to develop in capability to match the skill shown on its logistical side.
As such, it would be entirely complacent for Australians and our government to assume that the botched attack in Sydney this week represents the future. It does not. It represents everything that is likely to change as this insurgency continues: its capability will only increase, supported by a growing network of mosques across Australia that represent ‘bar’ in this deadly but politically-correct game of ‘tiggy’.
A key indicator that capability has increased – especially planning, coordination and strategy – will be when the targeting of attacks changes. At the moment, violence is focused against random individuals and crude attacks on law enforcement officers. Over time, a growing insurgency will look to undertake large scale mass attacks, insider attacks on police and Defence facilities and targeted assassinations of public figures, especially those who are prepared to speak against the growth of Islam in Australia.
Fortunately, our policing, security and intelligence agencies will likely have the means to monitor, understand and assess this capability as it grows and Australians will be informed if it does.
However, this does not mean that all attacks will be stopped.
The second limb of the threat assessment is intent: an understanding of the motivation to carry out attacks and the strategy behind them.
Unfortunately, when it comes to an assessment of intent, Australia is not so well placed. Our policing, security and intelligence agencies are wholly unprepared to assess intent. In fact, there is not one single officer in any Australian agency tasked with the job of understanding why two teenagers were motivated by Islamic teaching to behead an Australian this week.
Not one.
And that is why everyone in senior positions, from the Prime Minister to the head of ASIO, has in recent years rejected the suggestion that there is an inherent problem of violence with Islam and instead asserted that it is a peaceful religion which terrorists fail to understand. Unlike the ‘professionals’ with their heads in the sand, Australians are not so convinced. Half the nation now supports policies to restrict all Islamic immigration.
To demonstrate why blind faith in our security agencies’ assessment of Islam is hopelessly misguided, one only needs to understand the strange situation we find ourselves in.
The assessment we have been given is that violence occurs firstly as a result of a misunderstanding of the peaceful tenets of Islam. A secondary issue inflaming the situation is said to be factors of our own making, such as a national failure to integrate the Islamic community due to our own prejudice against it.
In relation to the second point, we are also supposed to be a nation that has rejected others as well. However, other migrant groups have not resorted to violence and Australia is much more open and ‘multicultural’ now than it ever has been. So, on any objective assessment, it must be acknowledged that the violence we now face is not actually due to any secondary factor of our own making at all. And that leaves only a misunderstanding of Islam as a cause of violence.
However, to believe the claim that Islam has been misunderstood, one must accept two things:
  1. Australia’s security agencies have assessed Islam and concluded on the evidence that it is peaceful. This would require dedication of analytical resources which has simply not been provided.
  2. Australia’s security agencies have then taken the evidence for that assessment and sat on it, failing to produce any coherent information operations plan that would undermine the violent but misguided beliefs of those who are strongly motivated to follow Islamic teachings as perfectly as they can.
In other words, if you truly believe that our government understands Islam and that it is peaceful, then you must also believe that Australia’s policing, security and intelligence agencies are guilty of gross incompetence by failing to outline in any rational way the peaceful tenets of Islam to those motivated to be good Muslims and who believe that to do so involves the occasional beheading of random strangers.
You can say ditto to that in regards to the entire political leadership of this nation, as well as the imams, muftis and sheikhs who have somehow managed to watch on in silence as a violent heresy has taken hold of Australia’s Islamic community.
However, the good news is that our national security agencies have not incompetently failed to use the peaceful teachings of Islam to prevent violence. Instead, they have incompetently assumed that Islam is peaceful. The failure to use peaceful Islamic teachings is a mere side effect of the fact that they don’t exist at all.
So let’s look at this insurgency’s intent and understand it properly.Islamic violence is based on the example of Mohammad himself (who was one of history’s most successful warlords). It is aided and abetted in Australia by politically-correct thinking that results in counter-productive deradicalisation programs and a paralysis of thought, language and action that is rendering it impossible for our government to meet its first duty: safety of Australians.
Firstly, one thing is clear: while capability may be low, it certainly cannot be assessed that intent is. There is a deadly intent to attack. It is so strong that it even seems to hinder capability, supressing any rational thought as to how the attack may be carried out successfully.
In the short term, that is good for us. However, we cannot assume that this intent will continue to be effected in such an irrational manner.
Another aspect of this intent is that it results in a desire to attack without any regards for personal safety. Indeed, part of the intent is that the perpetrator even die in the attack.
This makes no sense except when viewed in the light of Islamic teaching. From the days of Mohammad, those who died while fighting in jihad are believed to be given exalted places in heaven. If sex sells, it is certainly selling in Islamic eternity as well: 72 virgins and all that jazz.
As such, it is also important to understand that while this deadly intent is resulting in irrational decisions about how attacks are carried out, the intent to carry out attacks is not irrational at all. It is based on an understanding of Islamic teaching, history and Mohammad’s example and is entirely consistent with all three.
There is no way to counter this intent except by destroying faith in Mohammad and Islam. That’s because this intent is driven precisely by a faith in Mohammad and Islam. And it is this fact that our police, security and intelligence agencies completely fail to understand, as well as the politicians who direct them.
It also means that a key indicator of intent is Islamic fervour. When it grows quickly, warning bells should ring. And where it is present in any group, there will be a tendency to violence.
Another aspect of intent relates to the strategy for violence. These attacks do not occur simply as an end in themselves. They are a means to something greater: the imposition of Islamic rule in Australia.
And it is also on this point that we have a complete misunderstanding of the nature of the threat’s intent and its scale.
The entire Islamic community believes that it is Allah’s will that Australia should become Islamic and that they have a duty to participate in this process. This belief exists regardless of whether one is labelled moderate or extreme and it is a common unifying belief across all the varied (and often conflicting) Islamic sects. Further, every school of Islamic thought also accepts that in certain circumstances there is a righteous place for violence in order to achieve Islamic rule.
Thus it is wrong to view the Islamic community as split between those who support violence and those who do not. Rather, this community should be viewed as split into camps differing over whether the conditions justifying violence have been met.
When one understands this, one also gains a true understanding of the threat we face. It is not simply a threat from the violent. There is a political wing to this threat as well that uses non-violent means to advance the cause of Islamic rule. Of great concern, there is also a huge potential for violent intent to grow in scale as more of the Islamic community accept that conditions justifying violence have been met.
For the uneducated, Islamic violence is justified if the Islamic community is seen to be subjugated or Mohammad’s teachings are rejected. Violence and subjugation are also justified against non-Islamic minorities living under Islamic rule.
Importantly, as an Islamic community grows so does the expectation that its demands will be met. As such, any rejection of those demands will be deemed more serious. Additionally, every time the demands are placated it will only fuel further calls for Islamic rule and Sharia law.
The unfortunate reality is that while ever there is an Islamic population in Australia there will be conflict. When the Islamic population is very low (as it was until recently), this conflict will primarily be political, in line with Mohammad’s example while he was in the minority during his early years in Mecca. However, as the population grows so too will violence and in an exponential rather than linear fashion. This will also be in line with Mohammad’s example as he grew in power in his later years in Medina.
A true assessment of the Islamic insurgency we face would therefore conclude that its current capabilities are low but likely to increase and that there is scope for its deadly intent to grow significantly in scale.
And that means one thing: if we are having trouble keeping people alive on our streets now, we don’t want to let this insurgency fester any longer. Now is the best time to face it and defeat it. The best way to start would be to restrict all further Islamic immigration.
For those who claim that such measures are only likely to inflame the situation, I leave you with a crude but brutally truthful analogy.
Australia’s relationship with the Islamic community is like a woman caught up with a deadbeat boyfriend. She knows he is violent and in order to protect herself gives in to his every demand.
We all know that such a relationship cannot last and that concessions given today are unlikely to stop atrocities tomorrow.
Given that is the case, why on earth would Australia want to get into bed with Islam when it could end the relationship today and avoid a future of pain and misery…
Bernard GaynorPO Box 766Park Ridge, Qld 4125Australia
_____________________________________________________________________________
Response:
Thank you (Bernard Gaynor x Army intelligence officer Australian Defence Force) for your evaluation of the situation yes the security-political-social elite are suffering from a severe dangerous delusional state combined clearly with a policy driven mental illness pathological altruism.  Where we are to accept the “drink mint tea or eat Turkish pita” along with terror-genocide with equal equanimity based upon a western socialistic construct based upon a false dangerous assumption inherent in our Western security-political-social policy, as we are all the same physically-nature we can surely all get on – where the reality is culture-nurture determines such a view a very dangerous fallacy.
   
Some cultures such as the Chinese elite even the Islamic/Muslim culture itself in its core text and exemplar behaviors and final political/social manifestations know rightly this is a load of BS as the bloody bodies in their Chinese streets let alone the rest of humanity attest. Still the security services culpably continue despite the evidence to go along with ‘orders’.

"We have to stop with this debate of neutrality and secularity in Belgium and recognise and accept our multicultural society in all its manifestations. Not just when we want to drink mint tea or eat Turkish pita." sociologist Corinne Torrekens, a specialist in Muslim communities at the Free University of Brussels."
Terror sparks integration debate in France, Belgium, DW, Elizabeth Bryant, Molenbeek/Sevran, 05.04.2016

True in the main. Though it has been found in certain research to stage an effective insurgency a cultural population in revolt tends to be about 10% of the societal population globalisation, -communication, means altruistic enforcers able to come to the fore in other cultural dominated spaces operate across boundaries to elicit as you intimate increasingly violent outcomes for Other cultures.

"Support for ISIS in Mindanao has meant more than a repackaging of old kidnapping-for-ransom groups. It has facilitated cooperation across clan and ethnic lines, widened the extremist recruitment pool to include computer-savvy university students and opened new international communication and possibly funding channels. It means that more deadly violence in the Philippines involving alliances of pro-ISIS groups is a matter of when, not if. It may also increase the possibility of cross-border extremist operations."
PRO-ISIS GROUPS IN MINDANAO AND THEIR LINKS TO INDONESIA AND MALAYSIA, 25 October 2016, IPAC Report No. 33

There is no and a can be no 'split' of cultural thought only variations along a behavioural-cognitive behavioural variance otherwise the 'good' many would not be able to create and sustain the 'angels' they send into humanities streets.

If the good did not have evil as a basis for ethics-values-beliefs-motivation methodology in their families, communities, institutions there would be no terror-genocide the 'good' many are therefore culpable and always have been. As you intimate they the 'good' are very aware of the justification and authorisation of terror-genocide in their cultural codex they have to be otherwise it would never be so manifest in their own space.

The security services are quite efficient, and successful as they measure it for they are working under a Western-socialist-developed multiculturalism paradigm of acceptance of cultural cuisine along with a cultures terror-genocide under the framework any violence is caused by Others actions –marginalisation,-poverty-exclusion or lack of understanding of the ‘true’ Islam (so many?) from opportunity not by the cultures inherent construct of Other & own explicit exclusionary constructs see verse 5:51 of the Quran and are under World Health Organisation  dictates (as you are aware public servants even security forces need some justification-authorisation even for signing dangerous stupidity passing for successful policy) simply perpetrated by ‘mentally ill’ deviants where any deviance from an elites paradigm –violence be it terror-or generic  are now a ‘health’ issue not an escalating war as it is and always has been between  Muslims and Other historically and currently against Other.

What you have failed to explain is that such dangerous delusion on the part of Western Modernity policy makers security-political-social is inevitably violence will arise to counter violence Other are not going to allow another force within a space to visit violence increasingly against them whilst the state refuses as you rightly determine to remove the actual cause the Islamic construct of Other contained in Muslim codex and the exemplar behaviour of Mohammad. 

There will be violence, reactionary forces as we see in for instance Lebanon, Syria, …., Norway, … defensive enclaves will develop as they have elsewhere in time and space and the shattered buildings broken bodies and lives will in time as the Muslim population takes increasing political-social space be reflected in Australian streets – why would anyone believe it happens everywhere else in time and space where the Islamic/Muslim construct is allowed to develop and cannot happen here?

These security services so diligently, efficiently following orders and their political-social masters will be the focus of counter violence. You unleash a culture of terror-genocide against your own citizens, excuse your complicity which is plain for all to see what do you expect to happen – what has always happened?

I am opposed to such a future for my children’s, children … where violence becomes the final arbitrator as it has always in the past to resolve intercultural war. There is another way but it requires as you intimate the elite accepts the reality the Muslim cultural codex-and their infant-child-adolescent-adult development process =terror-genocide-as it always has and will.

If the security-political-social elite do not change course obviously as they continue to fail their citizens and put them and their culture in mortal danger a credible security-political-social elite needs to and will, if history is any measure, develop to replace them. I do hope very much this does not occur for my view is the method will be necessarily in the end the same as in the past.








Thursday, June 23, 2016

How Do You Stop a Future Terrorist When the Only Evidence Is a Thought? Wrong Question. First realise the 'Thought' is not their own it is their cultures.




A person, group, community, society and the cultures from which they are derived should never be judged and dealt with based upon ethics-morals-values-motivation methodology they espouse as the true source of their behaviour but upon the actual behaviour each inform. For does it matter to the victims the degree of espoused purity of intention of a person, group, community, society and the culture providing the framework by which each systematise-excuse such behaviour? What matters is what actually happens, not what we assume-presume should happen if the selected 'good 'principles in our Constitution, and Cultural Codex be they secular or religious or a combination of both were intended to inform.

For it will be found for those cultures signifying their Cultural Codex protects the innocent, it does not seek in any way to harm them, whilst at the same time professed adherents systemically inform terror genocide against Other there will be found within their cultural Codex a definition of innocent so circumscribed as to determine the cultural codex existence of globalised innocence as 
illusory. 

Lets keep it simple - if your next door neighbors children consistently succeeded/attempted to kill your children which no other neighbors children attempt to do-given parents have a great deal to do with the nature of their children's cultural-belief systems and motivation-reactive tendencies - even as it turns out the degree of a child's callous and uncaring traits - how is it racist to demand the parents be held accountable for the systemic exhibited behavior of children from this household? For who has set these infant-child-adolescent-adult ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation political/social methodology path, they or their parents-culture? Who therefore has to be held culpable to stop this terror the ones who deliver it or the ones who create them?

Turkish bill clears men of statutory rape if they marry, BBC, 18 November 
2016

Turkey issues arrest warrants for 42 journalists, SBS, 26 JUL 2016

"
Victims go to them expecting justice, and end up being prosecuted. They not only invalidate their (victimization); they actually punish them for it."
UK woman arrested in Dubai after reporting rape, group says, By Simon Cullen, Mustafa Al-Arab and Laura Smith-Spark, CNN, November 19, 2016

"Incidences like this are not uncommon in the Gulf.  Dubai struggles to maintain its promoted reputation of being tolerant, modern, progressive and focussed on happiness and positivity, while it regularly victimises women for reporting crime."
If you're shocked by a woman being arrested after reporting gang-rape in Dubai, you should know how common these cases are, Radha Stirling, Independent, Thursday 17 November 2016

We are assured by select group of political/religious leaders the views regards Other are only held by the 'few' the Islamic/Muslim religion is "tolerant, modern, progressive" and therefore Other should not be afraid of what the Islamic/Muslim culture can and does do "while it (Islamic/Muslim culture) regularly victimises women for reporting crime" and commits terror-genocide against Other each and every day.


"The blasphemy claims prompted much anger among Muslims  ... and more than 100,000 protesters took to the streets in Jakarta."
Jakarta's Christian governor Purnama in blasphemy row, Al Jazeera News, 
16 NOVEMBER 2016

50,000 demonstrators march through the streets of Cologne (Germany) to show support for Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan, Daily Mail, By ANTHONY JOSEPH, 1-8-2016

Only the 'few' is clearly a lie for where are the 'many' in response? Does silence mean Other will be safe, we know by experience it is exactly the opposite whatever statements may be made in private surveys as we see the effect, the actual outcome is not peace and harmony, the 'few' are in fact the 'many' and always have been. Even if a 'few' as these so called 'moderate' adherents of such a heinous codex claim, these 'few' as research clearly shows have an effect completely out of proportion to their actual numbers. Why should Other bare the tragic burden of such systemic cultural derived infamy arising from a cultures behavioral variance no matter how many of such a culture claim to be 'good'. Is just one child worth the cost of retaining such a culture within our midst to inform thousands more?

"Around 3000 protesters have rallied in the Indonesian capital calling for unity and tolerance, amid rising ethnic and religious tensions sparked by allegations of blasphemy against the city's Christian governor"
Thousands (3,000) march for tolerance in Indonesia,
Skynews,19 November 2016

"“We will not shut up. We will not obey. Withdraw the bill immediately!” the around 3000 protesters shouted amid claps and whistles as they marched to Kadikoy square on the city’s Asian side."

Protesters take to streets in Turkey to protest law that lets child rapists off the hook — if they marry, new.com.au, NOVEMBER 21, 2016

A culture exhibiting such pretence as the bloody broken bodies of Other in the streets and continuing endeavours of cultural adherents to create more attest, must if a society values its citizen’s lives and liberty remove such a culture from their presence by removing the cultural codex which forms each new generation which creates the cultural behavioural variance informing tragic consequence for humanity, even for cultural adherents themselves as such a cultural codex will.

H
ow Do You Stop a Future Terrorist When the Only Evidence Is a Thought? New York Times, by RUKMINI CALLIMACHI, JUNE 21, 2016

The answer is critical to stopping this-"'We will be killed one by one': Berkeley student hacked to death in Dhaka massacre made haunting call to her father as she cowered from terrorists... But authorities deny ISIS was behind attack" Daily Mail, 
3-July 2016

Bombing Kills More Than 140 in Baghdad, NTY, By FALIH HASSAN, TIM ARANGO and OMAR AL-JAWOSHY, JULY 3, 2016

Suicide bomber targets Pakistan’s lawyers, kills at least 53, The Washington Post, By Paul Schemm August 8 2016


The Scale of Turkey’s Purge Is Nearly Unprecedented, NYT, By JOSH KELLER, IARYNA MYKHYALYSHYN and SAFAK TIMUR AUG. 2, 2016

Turkey torture claims in wake of failed coupBy Mark Lowen, BBC Turkey correspondent

"Turkish authorities fired more than 2,800 judges and prosecutors on Wednesday, in the latest purge related to the July 15 coup, broadcaster CNN Turk reported.
Turkey has sacked or suspended some 80,000 people from the civil service, judiciary, police and courts following the attempted putsch, which it blames on followers of the U.S.-based cleric Fethullah Gulen."

Turkish authorities fire more than 2,800 judges, prosecutors, REUTERS, 
Aug 24, 2016

"In a part of the world where state security prisoners are a state secret.."
The 70,000 post-coup arrests are now at the heart of the Turkish government's propaganda war - From high-ranking military officials to university professors, those imprisoned since the attempted coup now total 70,756 - although some have been released, Independent, Robert Fisk Istanbul , Sunday 9 October 2016

'No protection for unmarried women

For Frank Seidler there are coercive and childhood intercourse. The man with the sparse head hair and the more impressive gray noise beard is a psychotherapist and chairman of the European Missionary Community (EMG). He says, "For many people who come here, we are the last hope."
....
Often the Muslim women - from Iran, from Afghanistan or the Caucasus - are looking for a way out of their marriage and therefore are rejected by their families. In a culture where people live strictly according to the rules of the Koran, a woman is only honorable if she has a husband, says Seidler. That leaves the men free: they could deal with them as they please.

Sabina Nazarian works as an interpreter for Farsi and Dari at EMG. She fled Afghanistan from Germany many years ago, declaring: "When a woman divorces, she has no value or protection in society." She is then free of birds. This leads to the fact that some women are tortured for years - and bear it in silence. "It's embarrassing," says Nazarian. "They're afraid that they'll be more expelled when they talk."

Debate on childhood In German small towns, helpers fight for children's brides 11.23.2016,· FOCUS-Online Editor Wera Engelhardt (Penkun)

Elizabethan-Panopticon rises=Those who mouth 'Populism' are determining the Citizen now as a greater threat to the State than the cultural cause-Islamic/Muslim Cultural informed tyranny- for of course a rational person believing in modernities definition of Liberty and Equality will move against such oppressive Muslim political/social constructs.


Genocide against Christians in the Middle East

"Rahami
is a 28-year-old American citizen who lived in Elizabeth, New Jersey and was born in Afghanistan. Law enforcement sources told CNN Rahami had travelled to Afghanistan a number of times.

"Once again someone we were told is ok turns out to be a terrorist who wants to destroy our country & its people - how did he get thru system?"..."

New York bomb suspect Ahmad Khan Rahami captured by police after shootout, SMH, by Josephine Tovey, SEPTEMBER 20 2016


"Sources told the Herald Sun that the 21-year-old arrived on one of the 300 boats carrying more than 20,000 Illegal Maritime Arrivals (IMAs) in 2013 under the Gillard-Rudd government. The alleged attacker was transferred to Christmas Island before settling in Melbourne on a bridging visa, which allowed him to temporarily live in the community while his claim was processed.


About 22,000 asylum seekers, many with unclear histories, are living in the community as agencies such as ASIO continue to conduct checks."
Suspect in Commonwealth Bank branch horror an asylum seekerAnnika Smethurst, National politics reporter, Herald Sun, November 18, 2016

Melbourne bank fire: mentally unwell asylum seeker feared deportationSAMANTHA MAIDEN AND ASHLEY ARGOON, The Sunday Telegraph, November 20, 2016

'Isolated Act', 'Mentally ill' 'not politically motivated' defense? 

Pressing Matters, A group headed by John Bolton said an anti-racism task force blamed the press for anti-Islam violenceArturo Garcia, 20-11-2016
Springvale bank fire attack not politically motivated, Premier Daniel Andrews saysABC, 20-11-2015

'Isolated Act', 'Mentally ill' 'not politically motivated'
defense is worse than ridiculous they are dangerous lies, as mere statistics let alone the fact culture=adherents behavioral variance prove otherwise, for how many other cultures inform the same behavior in our streets when their applications for asylum have been rejected or not even rejected, accepted, Muslims are still attempting or planning such attacks each and everyday against humanity?

Culture-family develop-set the reactive callous & uncaring trait which enables such behavior underwritten by the cultures definition-categorization of Other. Unless we face this fact, as elsewhere enabling such a culture to flourish in our streets, will as we see lead to much worse.


Woman trapped inside Commonwealth Bank claims attacker tried to stop people leaving
KATHRYN POWLEY, Herald Sun, November 20, 2016 


Culture creates via family-community-institutions an individual adherents behavioral variance and clearly as psychological research shows not all cultures infant-child-adolescent-adult development process framed by ther codex ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation and political/social methodology represent the same inherent risk to Other.

If it was indeed ISIS, IS, etc or the many many Muslim altruistic representative names historic, current and developing does it really matter to the victims or those families, communities, and nations suffering unfathomable grief derived from just one 'hacked' life of a child causes let alone in aggregate the millions over time past and to come? When will we hold to account the culture whose cultural codex construct of other, development process infant-child-adolescent-adult and dense network control systemically since the seventh century have created and sustained these cultural altruistic 'few' punishers/aligners who deal terror-genocide against Other and even against their own? Should such a cultural recipe delivering such tragedy continue to be tolerated in our midst?

"There are no boundaries to the intimate reach of political violence. What happens in one part of the world reaches the bodies and minds of peoples in other parts of the world. .. “Witnesses as well as victims are subject to the dialectic of trauma” (Herman, 1992, p. 2)."
WITNESSING THE EFFECTS OF POLITICAL VIOLENCE IN FAMILIES: MECHANISMS
OF INTERGENERATIONAL TRANSMISSION AND CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS, Kaethe Weingarten, Harvard Medical School, The Family Institute of
 Cambridge

This means a terrorist-genocide attack and progressive setting up of ethics-morals methodology which inevitably leads to a 'cleansing-purging' of societal opposition even within a culture of terror-genocide political/social dominated space as in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, ... as well as Other cultures dominated spaces are perceived rationally-rightly as a clear indication such a cultural codex informing such systemic violent behavior within a cultures behavioral variance is not worthy of continuing to exist within humanities political/social societal 
space.

"The time has come for us to be honest with ourselves and indeed each other." said Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenya's president

'suspicious'=Entire Culture=terror-genocide 'cleansing-purging' as the 'many'='few', as the entire 'good' Nazi culture='few'.

Kidding ourselves the definitions we utilise to determine all cultures can and are getting on famously has to end if this Muslim terror-genocide is to end.

“It (Damascus-Syria) has seen empires and tyrants come and go; it offers a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony. It is a wonderful city in which to be. …. a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony"
British Historian Dan Cruickshank BBC series "Cruickshank's Adventures in Architecture, Episode 5 - Connections, Syria, Damascus 2008, First aired on BBC Two in April 2008

"The time has come for us to be honest with ourselves and indeed each other. The radicalisation that breeds terrorism is not conducted in the bush at night. It occurs in the full glare of day in homes, in madrasas and in mosques with rogue imams. We must ask the question — where are the parents and families of those who are being radicalized?" said Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenya's president "Our task of countering terrorism has been made all the more difficult by the fact that the planners and financiers of this brutality are deeply embedded in our communities."

by EDITH HONAN GARISSA, Kenya — Reuters Published Sunday, Apr. 05 2015

Cultural
schemas are learn't when, how, why & may inform significantly different reactive responses to a perceived challenge as defined by a culture (be it determined a real or nonexistent challenge from an Other rational model perspective) of cultural codex-a culture's worldview political/social which means? Well for one thing it means an adherent of a culture does not become radicalised in a week attached to 21st century or 7th century technology. It is a dangerous lie. Why would any social psychologist promote or allow such a dangerous deception to continue to exist that it is the individual not the many-social group of the culture responsible for the aggression-violence-terror against Other? Dangerous because what does it allow the culture to continue to deliver to humanities streets?

"Even in integrated theories that account for both personal and situational factors (see Anderson & Bushman, 2002), the bulk of the explanatory power is placed on the individual. In other words, the classic developmental and personality theories of aggression do not necessarily constitute theories of group aggression, yet groups commit and receive more aggression than individuals (Meier & Hinsz, 2004). Groups large and small are synonymous with aggression in society (Baron & Kerr, 2004; Brewer, 2003)"
Aggression between Social Groups, James Densley and Jillian Peterson, 2016


"Mr Dutton said many foreign fighters were the children or grandchildren of migrants the former prime minister let in.

“The reality is Malcolm Fraser did make mistakes in bringing some people in the 1970s and we’re seeing that today,” the told Sky News last night.

“We need to be honest in having that discussion. There was a mistake made.”


Melbourne has experienced a recent crime wave sparked by the rise of the Apex street gang, which is dominated by youths with South Sudanese and Islander backgrounds.
...
“There’s been a lot of gang-related activity and when we look at say the Apex gang, it’s obviously centred around a group of people who are from Sudan who’ve decided they’re going to commit violent crimes against Melburnians, car-jackings, home invasions, and it just hasn’t stopped,” the former counter-terror policeman told ABC radio."

Peter Dutton says Malcolm Fraser’s immigration policy to blame for crime gangs, The Australian, RACHEL BAXENDALE, 
November 18, 2016

"Theorizing about a latent variable must transcend the world of mathematical abstractions and pinpoint a real entity, which plays a causal role in the correlations among manifest variable—regardless of whether this entity is a process, a set of processes, or some common property/characteristic of processes."

Process Overlap Theory: A Unified Account of the General Factor of IntelligenceKristof Kovacs & Andrew R. A. Conway,  02 Aug 2016

"How Do You Stop a Future Terrorist When the Only Evidence Is a Thought?" Wrong Question as the 'Thought' is not their own it is their cultures. The right question:

'How Do You Stop a Culture creating Terrorists (cultural altruistic enforcers/punishers) When the Only Evidence Is a Thought?'

First realise the 'Thought' is not the terrorists own 'Thought', it is their cultures 'Thought'. You have to face the fact the 'few' terrorists are altruistic enforcers/punishers created for a cultural 'rational' system purpose otherwise the 'few' would never come into existence utilising the ethics-values-beliefs-motivation nor methodology the 'few' do, as social psychology research tells us the 'few' are few in number relative to the whole because of the intrinsic cost of being one of the true-perfect believer ‘few’, and importantly fear & the cultural codex knowledge⇆justification and authority works to achieve the required Tranquility of Silence-relative degrees of cultural acquiescence along the cultural behavioral variance to achieve cultural 
goals.

"In the war against terrorism, the French police and intelligence services are targeting about 15,000 individuals who may pose a threat."
15,000 Islamists that police monitors, JDD, Europe 1, October 8th, 2016

The
 whole of culture, the ‘many’, are therefore not required at the cultural front nor would it be culturally advisable to do so for how is the culture to sustain itself all out on the front line? Given the extreme cultural methodology of certain cultural derived altruistic enforcers/punishers some cultures necessarily require a relatively sophisticated developed mantel of deniability – otherwise how long would Other cultures put up with their presence before Other cultures moved decisively to remove this attacking culture from their space? States supporting the continuing existence of such a culture in their space necessarily fall in line with the cultures defence strategy as the State have to justify the bloody bodies in the streets are not due to lack of State action.

“Instead of responding to attacks against freedom of expression, voices were raised to decry blasphemy and to propose compromise with terrorism. There is no blasphemy in a democracy,” Mr. Rushdie said. ..
..the writer decried the reluctance of Western governments to use the words “Muslim” or “Islam,” preferring instead to attribute terrorist attacks to “unbalanced” people or to a generic thing like “radicalism” or “extremism,” even when the attackers themselves say Islam is their motive."

‘Satanic Verses’ author Salman Rushdie: ‘Today, I would be accused of Islamophobia, racism’ By Victor Morton - The Washington Times - Tuesday, September 6, 2016

Alas Mr. Rushdie 
blasphemy has arrived in our Western Democratic space courtesy of those who claim to protect, yet introduce a deviance paradigm of blasphemy as a valid construct.

"..I think it’s blasphemous to the extent that I can comment on someone else’s religion." Director General of ASIO, Duncan Lewis
Terror alert: Australia’s top spy chief warns rift with Muslims could weaken national security December 13, 2015 Samantha Maiden,National Political Editor, The Sunday Telegraph

And what will, not may, happen where such a deviance construct of blasphemy is introduced by such dangerous ill-considered elite 
views?

"Friday, September 30 is International Blasphemy Rights Day, a day to stand in support of the right to question, criticize, and challenge ideas, at a time when blasphemy laws strip that right from millions around the world. The victims are often atheists, but also members of minority faiths, or those in the majority who dare to dissent from prevailing beliefs.
But sometimes it is not the force of law that silences free expression, but the swing of a blade."

Richard Dawkins Foundation, 30-9-2016

J
ordanian writer Nahed Hattar was on his way to face blasphemy charges in Amman when a gunman, apparently seeking to punish Hattar for the satirical cartoon that led to the charges, shot him in front of a courthouse. The blasphemy charges cast a harsh light on the limits of free expression in one of the most democratic Arab states, just as the killing and and other recent violent incidents exposed how sectarian strife roiling the rest of the region is threatening Jordan’s stability.

Hattar’s trial and his death are just more brutal reminders of how theocratic governments and religious vigilantes -- often one in the same -- try to silence voices that challenge their dogma and power.”

Robyn Blumner, President & CEO, Richard Dawkins Foundation, September 28, 2016

".
.for whatever reason becomes inspired to act ....a violent Islamist ideology which perverts the religion of Islam" said Australian (NSW) Deputy Commissioner Catherine Burn... on two occasions .. Mr Khan abused and threatened people in public for their non-Islamic behaviour. .. allegedly suffers from schizophrenia"
Suburban stabbing 'the new face of terrorism', The Sydney Morning Herald, by Rachel Olding, September 12, 2016

'Copy of Islamic State's magazine' SO WHAT TEST. CULTURAL PREJUDICE-SCHEMA DEVELOPED WHEN-HOW-BY WHOM? 'serious mental health issues including schizophrenia'=ACTUAL ACTION? WITHOUT CULTURAL SCHEMA=?

"The
 Saudi Gazette quoted witnesses as saying that the police - known as the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice - had stopped men who tried to help the girls and warned "it is a sinful to approach them".

The father of one of the dead girls said that the school watchman even refused to open the gates to let the girls out."

Saudi police 'stopped' fire rescue BBC, Friday, 15 March, 2002

"In the proposal, the council advises men to beat their wives if they refuse to dress as he wishes her to, talk to strangers or speak loudly. Wives may also be reprimanded if they give anyone money without the husband giving her permission first."
Men should ‘lightly beat’ their wives if they refuse sex, according to Islamic council leader, Fionn Hargreaves, staff writers and AFP News Corp Australia Network, MAY 30, 2016

"The attacks - there have been at least four in the busy city in central Iran in recent weeks - appear aimed at terrorising women who dare to test the boundaries of the Islamic dress code.

The crimes coincided with the passage of a new parliamentary bill that allows private citizens to enforce "morality" laws."

Acid attacks in Iran sharpen row over Islamic dress and vigilantism Reuters BY BABAK DEHGHANPISHEH BEIRUT Wed Nov 5, 2014

"Two women convicted over a genital mutilation procedure on two girls have shown no remorse and only offered "qualified, ambiguous and self-serving" apologies, a NSW (Australian) court has heard."

Women convicted over 'repugnant' genital mutilation of two girls 'showed no remorse' Australia ABC 6-2-
2016

"Javaria
 Saeed, a practicing Muslim, resigned from the SO15 counter-terrorism division of the Metropolitan Police, which was tasked with outreach to the Muslim community. She cited a culture of “political correctness” and two specific cases, in which she alleged a senior Muslim constable had called female genital mutilation (FGM) a “clean, an honorable practice” that “shouldn’t be criminalized.” FGM is illegal in the UK.

On another occasion, the same officer reportedly said Muslim women who face domestic abuse should seek to resolve the situation via sharia tribunals rather than going through the courts.

Despite reporting the incidents to her superiors, no action was taken against the offending officer.

Other officers called her a “bad Muslim” for not wearing a hijab (head covering) and said she would be “better off at home looking after your husband.”

“My experiences were that it was Muslim officers being racist towards my individual views; also in private, holding racist views against white officers, and sexist views against females,” she told the Sunday Times. “If such views were held and expressed by white officers, they would be fired.”

Facebook Censors Discussion On Sharia, Facebook censored a video allegedly showing the execution of gay people by jihadis in Libya, from the page "Should America Fear Sharia." BY ELLIOT FRIEDLAND Mon, September 12,
 2016

"..perverts the religion of Islam"? All enforcing Islamic behavioral constructs in the streets, in Western police departments and security and military establishments and the many who enable them to be there to do so, and are even watching what the Western modernity determines as atrocities, are mentally ill, suffer from schizophrenia, obsessed, extremists - so many? Those objecting to a culture systematically informing terror-genocide and tragic misogynistic outcomes are suffering from a mental illness a phobia? It is rationally based upon the evidence as well as statistically absurd to claim so.

So claiming you’re the ‘many’ innocent and not culpable is really unacceptable in an inter-cultural conflict where these cultural derived terrorists, as they have to be, utilizing terror-genocide come into Other cultures space and even attack their own as such cultures with an inherent codex construct of terror-genocide tend to do –everyone, everyone in turn may be determined as Other.

Secondly
 you have to face the fact these 'few' are created via the cultures 'many' non radicalised. 'moderate', law abiding families, communities and institutions development process infant-child-adolescent-adult imbued with cultural ethics-morals-values-beliefs-motivation and methodology individuals do not make up their own the culture is therefore culpable - the few will be replaced.

".. survey found that majorities in Morocco, Egypt, Pakistan, and Indonesia—ostensibly moderate Muslim countries—favored a strict application of Shari‘a law in every Islamic country and keeping Western values out of Islamic counties. However, that survey reports the attitudes of residents in non-Western countries that enforce Shari‘a to varying degrees. It might be expected that Muslims in the West—who are immersed in Western culture, values, and democracy—would express different attitudes than their counterparts in the Middle East, Far East, and North Africa. 

Unfortunately, the results of the current survey strongly suggest that Islam—as it is generally practiced in mosques across the United States—continues to manifest a resistance to the kind of tolerant religious and legal framework that would allow its followers to make a sincere affirmation of liberal citizenship. This survey provides empirical support for the view that mosques across America, as institutional and social settings for mosque-going Muslims, are at least resistant to social cooperation with non-Muslims. Indeed, the overwhelming majority of mosques surveyed promoted literature supportive of violent jihad and a significant number invited speakers known to have promoted violent jihad and other behaviors that are inconsistent with a reasonable construct of liberal citizenship.”

Shari‘a and Violence in American Mosques, by Mordechai Kedar and 
David Yerushalmi

The 'few' of a culture become as they always will when enabled to do so? The'many'.

"Twitter announcing Thursday, August 18 have suspended accounts 235,000 in the last six months.Twitter ensures that adding to that the 125,000 accounts they had already announced removed between mid-2015 and February 2016, 360,000 such accounts have been closed altogether. " daily suspensions increased by 80% since last year, with immediate peaks after the terrorist attacks " , says the company."
Twitter says you remove terrorist propaganda 235,000 accounts in six months, THE WORLD, by Morgane Tual, 18.08.2016

"According to the report, 1077 people were arrested in the EU for terrorism-related offences last year alone, almost half of which took place in France (424).
The 2015 arrests double those made in 2013, when only 535 were taken into custody.
Almost all of those arrested last year, 94 per cent, were convicted.
The numbers of terror attacks and attempts also increased but not at the same rate as arrests, suggesting more are being foiled than carried out."

Terrorist attacks in Europe: This is how dangerous it has become, Debra Killalea, news.com.au, JULY 22, 
2016

"Ahmed
Adan said his son was born in Kenya but grew up in the United States. Other family members said Dahir Adan was beginning his third year as a student at St. Cloud State University.

Police told Ahmed Adan about 9 p.m. Saturday that his son had died at the mall, he said. He had “no suspicion” of his son being involved in any terrorist activity, he added. Police raided the apartment on St. Germain Street on Sunday morning and seized photos and other materials, Ahmed Adan said.

Inside the building where the Adans lived, a neighbor said the younger Adan sometimes wore a security guard uniform. A cousin down the hall in the same building described Dahir Adan as a good person who minded his own business.

At the news conference Sunday, St. Cloud Mayor Dave Kleis said three of the nine stabbing victims remained hospitalized as of 7 a.m. ...

Jaylani Hussein, executive director in Minnesota of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said Sunday that “we are definitely concerned about the potential for backlash in the community, both in the immediate run and the longer term.”

Hussein called the attack “an isolated incident, and we still don’t know the full facts.”

Ahmed Said, executive director of the Somali American Relations Council, said they don’t know whether religion motivated Adan, “but we know he is a Somali.”

“Let us not rush and jump into conclusions,” Said said in a statement. “… We strongly stress that everybody calms down and focus on what unites us than what divides us in these difficult times.”

Barakad Omar, a classmate of Dahir Adan at Apollo High School, said he was “a good kid” and an A student.

He was more into sports than religion, said Jama Alimad, a community leader and close friend of the family, who described him as “the most assimilated kid in the neighborhood.” He worked part-time as a security guard at Electrolux Home Products in St. Cloud."

Family identifies attacker behind 'potential act of terrorism' in St. Cloud-9 victims survived knife attacks at St. Cloud mall; ISIL link claimed. By Brandon Stahl, Beatrice Dupuy and Paul Walsh Star Tribune staff writers, SEPTEMBER 19, 2016

Contained in the last qoute are invalid assumptions and fallacious basis for denial. The most pertinent dangerous assumptions 'There is more that unite us than divide us' murder by the Muslim culture would not occur if this were the case, also there is no threat from enabling the Islamic/Muslim refugees or even immigrants crossing into Others space and lack of a job or lack of education is the cause of terror.

Thirdl
y even with cultures with an inherent cultural terror-genocide construct of Other in their codex there will always be the 'good' in any cultural bounded behavioral variance telling you they want peace and harmony, possibly even believing it to be true, diminishingly reflecting back your own ethics-beliefs within their behavioral variance particularly in an Other dominated political/social space - it is what is systemically occurring in the other part of the same behavioral variance which is the truth of the matter regards the culture.

"Ahmad Khan Rahami, 28, worked with members of his family at First American Fried Chicken in Elizabeth, New Jersey.
He lived with his family above the takeout spot, a few miles from Newark Liberty International Airport.
"He's a very friendly guy, that's what's so scary," said one patron, Ryan McCann.
"They never seemed out of the ordinary, they just Americanised.
"You would've never knew anything. He'd always talk about his cars.
"He loved Civics, he loved going fast, that's what he did, he'd talk about his cars."
He had attended Middlesex County College, where he majored in criminal justice, from 2010-12, but did not graduate according to school officials.
Flee Jones, 27, told the New York Times Mr Rahami's appearance and behaviour began to change after he visited his native Afghanistan about four years ago.
After returning from his trip, he grew a beard, began wearing traditional Muslim robes and prayed in the back of the store.
He was not listed on counter-terrorism databases, US officials said."

Ahmad Khan Rahami: US blasts suspect a 'very friendly guy', BBC, 20/9/2015

"POLICE swooped and arrested a doctor’s teenage son in Melbourne before bombs were found at his Greenvale home, foiling an “imminent terror plot”."

A friend of the arrested teen’s family said they were respectable, and did not believe he could have done wrong.

“(He has) no bad preacher. He is a very quiet boy. He cannot drive. His father is a doctor and cannot allow him to do anything wrong,” the friend said.

“He has to look after his son properly."

Police find homemade bombs, arrest teen in Greenvale anti-terror raids
ANTHONY DOWSLEY, SIMON BENSON, DAVID HURLEY HERALD SUN MAY 09, 2015 9:42AM

"Behaviour of man arrested in Melbourne counter-terrorism raids improved after attending Islamic centre, father says.

Haidar attended the Al Furqan Islamic study centre and Harun Causevic started going there in July 2014.

Mr Causevic said the changes in his son were all positive.

“Before he started to pray, Harun was in the house aggressive, he broke [things], like a child. But after when he started to pray he really changed behaviour, 100 per cent,” he said.

“Now he was very good, always. Never, never yells, never, never do bad in house."

Father of suspect in counter-terrorism raid speaks EMMA YOUNGER The NewDaily Apr 19, 20
15

The reality of 'more' religion creates a parental delusional state regards the altruistic nature of their children regards Other. Taking religious outliers expounding greater positive altruistic motives regards Other on the basis of their perceived religiosity-spirituality is a very dangerous mistake particularly if you are responsible for policy making - responsible in the process of being responsible for fellow citizens lives.

"..
children raised in religious households, who are perceived to be more empathetic and sensitive to justice, are in fact less altruistic to their own class mates .... children from religious households also differ in their ratings of deserved punishment for interpersonal harm (F(2, 847) = 5.80, p < 0.01, h2 = 0.014); this was qualified by significantly harsher ratings of punishment by children from Muslim households than children from non-religious households (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between children from Christian households and non-religious households.".
The Negative Association between Religiousness and Children’s Altruism across the World, November 05, 2015

These Muslim terrorists are coming straight from the 'good' families, communities and institutions believing their sons, daughters, fellow adherents are the "very good", 'angels' positively altruistic, the trouble is these 'angels', are Muslim 'angels'. The start is always when Other pose a political/social power impediment:


Macro idea "We take practical steps to help the community and supply order." then "Once the population have become engaged and accepting of the macro idea, a second, more explicit micro idea is introduced. In any occupied city, the governing mantra of ISIS (Muslims) soon became; Obey this list of edicts based upon our interpretation of Sharia law (Rosen, 2014)."
Collaboration Guidelines to Transform Culture, Benjamin Heslop, Kylie Bailey, Jonathan Paul, Antony Drew, Roger Smith,10-14-2016

"Islamic fundamentalists who patrol the streets of Germany acting as “Sharia police” and scolding people not to drink, gamble or listen to music aren’t doing anything illegal, a court ruled."
German court OKs party pooping ‘Sharia police’
 POSTMEDIA NETWORK TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2016

Quran 008,012 Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them.


"Islam does permit reprimanding and beating the child for purposes of correction and, in fact, orders such action. We find that the youth in the Western countries go astray because of excess of freedom given to them."
ISLAMIC PRINCIPLES OF UPBRINGING CHILDREN, Chapter 74: Physical Punishment

If you authorise violence to 'correct' in-groups members what will be an inevitable tool for 'correcting' out-group persons? What is the actual affect of corporal punishment and authoritarian parenting.

".. higher levels of harsh parenting were positively related to child behavior problems at both high and low levels of child callous unemotional (CU) behavior behavior in cross-sectional and longitudinal models....
...parental harshness may have a non-specific effect on increases in both CU behavior and general behavior problems, which could have lasting implications for parental socialization efforts and child conduct problems at later stages of development."

Callous-unemotional behavior and early-childhood onset of behavior problems: the role of parental harshness and warmth, 
Waller, Rebecca; Gardner, Frances; Shaw, Daniel S; Dishion, Thomas J; Wilson, Melvin N; Hyde, Luke W, 2015

"Corporal punishment varies widely across countries. In the eight countries involved in the
present study, overall effects showed that corporal punishment was related to increases, and maternal warmth was related to decreases, in children’s anxiety and aggression over time."
Corporal punishment, maternal warmth, and child adjustment: a longitudinal study in eight countries, Lansford, Jennifer E; Sharma, Chinmayi; Malone, Patrick S; Woodlief, Darren; Dodge, Kenneth A; Oburu, Paul; Pastorelli, Concetta; Skinner, Ann T; Sorbring, Emma; Tapanya, Sombat, 2014

You promote/excuse cultural violence as a means of infant-child-adolecent-adult development you will reap violence and deliver it to Other.


The point is Muslim ethics-values-motivation methodology of these 'good' Muslim families, communities and institutions are creating and sustaining within their very midst these 'angels' - clearly the existent Muslim schemas do not contradict but in fact must enable such terrorist behavior otherwise it would not exist. Culture the whole culture including the 'good' must be culpable and held to be so. Why? Individuals do not invent their own ethics-values-beliefs-motivation methodology cultures impose them and they as any system must have an inherent reason from systemically informing the same.

Fourthly
your cultural rational view as to the definition of 'moderate' under another cultural 'rational' system can never be assumed to be the same nor any where near it. Holding to this 'moderate' claim as proof a culture does not inherently determine your cultural demise 'conversion' in the end game, particularly in an Other dominated space is a very dangerous approach. Any cultural gatekeeper observed making such a fatal error should be removed immediately from any inter-cultural policy development influence. 

"But what exactly did they mean by “moderate Islam”? Unpacking that term made it clear how wide the values gap is between Saudi Arabia and its American ally. The kingdom’s “moderate Islam” publicly beheads criminals, punishes apostates and prevents women from traveling abroad without the permission of a male “guardian.

Don’t even ask about gay rights."

A Saudi Morals Enforcer Called for a More Liberal Islam. Then the Death Threats Began.
NTY, By BEN HUBBARD, JULY 10, 2016

'How Do You Stop a Culture creating Terrorists (cultural altruistic enforcers/punishers) When the Only Evidence Is a Thought?'

Remove the cultures codex constructs of Other + development process from societal public and private spheres or change nothing.


If you disagree with the argument and conclusion, to be right you need to prove the following is false:

Biology Determines Our Human Hands Have the Same Constituent Parts as Other.
Culture Determines Our Human Hands Will Inform Differing Outcomes for Other.

And

Aristotle's Four  causes: Material, Formal, Efficient, Final determine an acorn grows into an Oak tree not a zebra.


Turkey, Belgium, Orlando, Syria, Iraq,Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sydney, Boston, London,.. .... the list is endless historic and current of Islamic/Muslim derived political and social, oppression and societal fracturing, statistically such systemic cultural derived behavior requires significant reevaluation of sacred assumptions regards Western Democracies current fallible abstract 'rational' paradigms failing to protect and enable a flourishing life in security and peace for citizens.

"Every set of beliefs introduces its own logic and its own constraints.

..to a decision scientist, “rational” means “consistency with some model.” Rational decisions are not necessarily dispassionate, nor well-reasoned, nor selfish. They are not even necessarily good decisions, from others’ perspectives. They simply are consistent."

Distinguishing Spiritual from Temporal Power, Inventing the Individual, The origins of Western Liberalism, Larry Siedentop, 2014

"Without the ceaseless pulsating heartbeat of our categorization engine, we would understand nothing around us, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action.

…..every culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic labels that come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and entities"

SURFACES AND ESSENCES, ANALOGY AS THE FUEL AND FIRE OF THINKING, Douglas Hofstadter (American professor of cognitive science), Emmanuel Sander (French Psychologist-Developmental Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, Educational Psychology), 2013

"Culture, of course, is related to violence in general and not only to structural violence. For example, culture influences the determination of "thresholds" which pressure on a person must overcome in order to move that person from being controllable, or even positive, to being negative (that is, into violence)." The Culture of Violence, Chp 3. On the relationship between violence and culture - Galtung's concept

Cultural codex constructs (categorisation engines) and development process not to blame? As the research determines otherwise you are going have to provide yourself with actual proof your view is correct simply saying it even believing it is not sufficient as evidence to prove the conclusion above invalid. In aggregate political/social terms given the victims and rising you can understand making the effort to question assumptions is required of all of us.

Whatever are viewed regards the Islamic/Muslim culture or any culture with a terror-genocide construct of Other inherent in their codex for a temporal period of "a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony" it is only ever a temporal space for building to cultural political/social thresholds to enable the renewal of the holocaust against Other, it may not come the next day, the next twenty years, 100 years but it will come.

And
 you will see/hear the building of Islamic/Muslim rationale for attacks against Other prior, and to ignore them as aberrations of radicals and not as the inherent ethical-belief system of the Islamic/Muslim culture given the bloody bodies informed by the exact same culture elsewhere in time and space is a dangerous delusion for the pronouncements will be made from the highest levels in the Islamic/Muslim cultural hierarchy by the Islamic/Muslim ideological leadership and they will not stop until the cultures codex constructs of Other + development process are removed from societal public and private spheres.

No merriness here: mosque puts fatwa on Christmas, SMH. by Natalie O'Brien, December 23, 2012

Sydney siege: Two hostages and gunman dead after heavily armed police storm Lindt cafe in Martin Place, ABC, 16 Dec 2014


Terror shooting: Teen killer ‘turned’ at Parramatta mosqueTHE AUSTRALIAN, by Dan Box, OCTOBER 5, 2015

"The existence of the Jewish colony in China was discovered by the Jesuit Fathers in the seventeenth century, if not earlier; Kaifung, some four hundred and fifty-miles south-west of Peking, being the headquarters of the colony. When Martin visited the place in 1866, he found the synagogue, supposed to be built in 1164, in ruins; the Jews had dispersed, some having become Mohammedans, and not one being able to speak a word of Hebrew. In 1850 certain Hebraic rolls were recovered from the few remaining descendants of former Jews, .."
China in Transformation, A. R. Colquhoun, 1898


"Experience has taught me that all argument is useless with fanatical young Nazi of this kind, and so I say nothing….
..the Germans (inclusive of the Nazi) that great unified people are looking for peace and see friendship with Britain as a basis for peace not only for themselves but for everyone else..
In fact, if the extremist’s elements had prevailed. I have not the least doubt that disruption would have been more drastic and that we should have real reason by now to fear German aggression from both a military as well as political point of view.”
Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937

“It (Damascus-Syria) has seen empires and tyrants come and go; it offers a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony. It is a wonderful city in which to be. …. a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony"

British Historian Dan Cruickshank BBC series "Cruickshank's Adventures in Architecture, Episode 5 - Connections, Syria, Damascus 2008, First aired on BBC Two in April 2008

Australian Foiled Australian attacks:
Australian authorities have disrupted terrorist planning in Australia and thwarted attacks. As a result of their activities, 23 people have been convicted of terrorism offences in Australia in the last four years.
Below is some information on those who were unsuccessful in their attempts to use chemicals of security concern to do harm on Australian soil.
..........
2008 – Abdul Nacer Benbrika and others
Benbrika was convicted in 2008 on the charge of intentionally being the leader and a member of a terrorist organisation. During the trial, jurors heard recordings of Benbrika discussing the use of explosives and whether he could obtain 500kg of ammonium nitrate.
2006 – Faheem Khalid Lodhi
Lodhi was convicted of terrorism offences in 2006 when the court found evidence to suggest he had planned to bomb the national electricity system.
A large amount of incriminating material was found in Lodhi’s possession including a handwritten terrorism manual for the manufacture of homemade poisons and explosives.
Lodhi had provided a false name and fictitious address to a chemical company in order to buy chemicals, and had advised them that he was planning to use the chemicals to start up a detergent company.
2005 – Omar Baladjam and others
A series of raids across the Sydney metropolitan area resulted in nine men being arrested and later charged with conspiring to commit a terrorist act. It was alleged that the arrested men had sourced chemicals and materials that could be used in the preparation of an explosive device.
2004 – Jack Roche
Roche pleaded guilty to planning a terrorist act. He had planned to use homemade bombs to target the Israeli Embassy in Canberra.

"Tony Abbott raises Australia’s terror threat to high"

Tony Abbott raises Australia’s terror threat to high SEPTEMBER 12, 2014 news.com.au

"This is a wonderful multicultural society we have."  Queensland Premier Campbell Newman said it was not about religion but about people involved in criminal acts.
Logan mosque targeted with anti-Muslim pamphlets, sparking fears of violence..ABC By Leonie Mellor SEPTEMBER 13, 2014

Oxford Dictionary Definition of terrorism:
The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
Oxford Dictionary Definition of crime:
An action or omission which constitutes an offence and is punishable by law:
shoplifting was a serious crime.

"The National Terrorism Threat Level for Australia is PROBABLE. Credible intelligence, assessed by our security agencies indicates that individuals or groups have developed both the intent and capability to conduct a terrorist attack in Australia."

The radicalisation and recruitment of Australians is increasing.  National Terrorism Threat Advisory System, 12-8-2016

Afghanistan's dwindling Sikh, Hindu communities flee new abuses, Reuters, KABUL | BY HAMID SHALIZI, Jun 22, 2016

"Obama described how he has watched Indonesia gradually move from a relaxed, syncretistic Islam to a more fundamentalist, unforgiving interpretation; large numbers of Indonesian women, he observed, have now adopted the hijab, the Muslim head covering...... 
"Early on, Obama saw Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, the president of Turkey, as the sort of moderate Muslim leader who would bridge the divide between East and West—but Obama now considers him a failure and an authoritarian, one who refuses to use his enormous army to bring stability to Syria." 

The Obama Doctrine: The U.S. president talks through his hardest decisions about America’s role in the world. By JEFFREY GOLDBERG, The Atlantic, APRIL 2016

What we in the Western Democracies are confronting is in essence an internal crises of significant difference in ethics-values-beliefs as sociology-anthropology developed notions of differing worldviews having equal status-access to societal space despite certain cultures having inherent sociopathy regards Other and women. Where the ideology and development process which informs systemic violence against Other and women cannot be challenged in fact those doing so are either criminalised or at the very least labeled as evil  suffering from mental illness with efforts to have such objectors socially shamed and shunned takes place, even blamed for inciting the very terror-genocide to which their culture is subject. 


"The use of force and violence is more commonplace and prevalent in some families, communities, religions, cultural/ethnic groups and societies based on the views and values about adult prerogatives with children espoused. They may also be based upon the sociopathy of the perpetrators." Treatment of Complex Trauma Courtois/Ford @2016

Sociopathy groups of people who adopt belief systems which cause them to behave in a similar fashion.

..it is not aggression which moves armies it is devotion, moreover what brings about such conflicts at its most fundamental level are irreconcilable values, perceptions of a radical different nature, what brings these things about actually is a form of discourse, sometimes we call it propaganda but whatever it is legions are moved by words and symbols… more than the devil made me do it, or instinctually I am like that, people do not go to war because of their evolutionary history they go to war for statable discoverable reasons bound up with politics and culture, civilisation, religious and moral values.. great variety of factors that incline whole peoples to warfare he establishes that these factors are deeply embedded in culture and cultural differences create other differences… 
The lamp of history illuminates what is beyond the readers desk, the readers village the ocean which surround the readers nation. When properly constructed the lamp of history, the study of history, illuminates the very commonalities that constitute human nature itself, what is taught is this wherever you find human beings these lessons are lessons worth learning and no matter how different the language or the culture or the customs or the diet there is a root humanity that is reached by such events that will allow us to predict how we are likely to behave under certain conditions and how those conditions therefore should either be promoted or shunned depending upon whether our behaviour is to be laudable or reprehensible.. .. the cause of war, the casus belli, is a complex of conflicting aspirations, someone is trying to achieve something, some group of people are trying to achieve something, and prepared to risk life and limb to do it and to have others die for it.” 
Professor Daniel N. Robinson, Oxford University, Author of An Intellectual History of Psychology.

The objectors to the nature of women's condition are told they are bigots and need to 'understand' why the culture acts the way it does, and western ethical-beliefs will in time change their ways - be 'reformed' - being the same logic as being told a Nazi throwing a gas canisters into concrete showers needs 'understanding' and one must wait until the full glory of Western Modernity ethics-beliefs seeps through and all will be well - its a load of BS for there is absolutely no constructed argument to determine how this 'reform' will be attained given there have been calls from individuals both from the culture itself and Other for it to do so for centuries, also there is not argument at all defending why meantime we should even accept victims of such a culture to continue to be thrown in front of us nor how long this 'reform' even if it is possible would take.

The whole approach is based upon false assumptions firstly we are all human therefore we should all get along, culture determines this an impossibility as clearly history has shown and research into the nature of interactions between various groups imbued with significantly differing values - sacred values, it is simply not going to happen has never happened. Either one will remain in societal space or the other as Lincoln rightly determined.

Culture, of course, is related to violence in general and not only to structural violence. For example, culture influences the determination of "thresholds" which pressure on a person must overcome in order to move that person from being controllable, or even positive, to being negative (that is, into violence)." The Culture of Violence, Chp 3. On the relationship between violence and culture - Galtung's concept


"Without the ceaseless pulsating heartbeat of our categorization engine, we would understand nothing around us, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action.
…..
every culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic labels that come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and entities"
SURFACES AND ESSENCES, ANALOGY AS THE FUEL AND FIRE OF THINKING, Douglas Hofstadter (American professor of cognitive science), Emmanuel Sander (French Psychologist-Developmental Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, Educational Psychology), 2013

".a cluster of friends or fellow travellers may come to hold sacred values, perhaps initially  influenced by one or a few of them, and then fuse into an imagined family-like group  defined and driven by these values. Furthermore, when sacred values are at the core of motivations to make extreme sacrifices, it becomes clear how people can sustain commitment and continue to fight. This result is so even when most of the group they were fused with has perished,."
Devoted actors sacrifice for close comrades and sacred cause
Scott Atrana,1, Hammad Sheikhb, and Angel Gomezc aCNRS-Institut Jean Nicod, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 75005 Paris, France; bDepartment of Psychology, New School for Social Research, New York, NY 10011; and cFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Also there is an assumption religious ideologies in particular operate under the 'Golden Rule', 'Do unto Others as you would do unto yourself' & Love they Neighbor as thyself & Do not harm innocents, despite clear significant differences to other ideologies be they religious or secular of sacred values which would predict, as mere empirical observation provides evidence for, Other, neighbor, innocent in certain cultural categorisation engines within cultural codex are so circumscibed as to be not like me at all, non-human -ape, evil, not a neighbor nor innocent. Clearly religions as any secular ideology can and do inform infamy against humanity to claim this is not the case has to be a regarded as a severe psychological delusional state for the evidence across history to this very day informs us otherwise. The following quote is an example of such delusion underwriting a policy which refuses to hold the Islamic/Muslim culture culpable for its systemic crimes crimes against Other and women. 

"In all the monotheism faiths we taught to love one another. That is what God wants. Not bashing one another" said one facebooker 
2015

"It’s war, we don’t have to be afraid to say this … a war of interests, for money, resources. I am not speaking of a war of religions. Religions don’t want war. The others want war.”"
The Pope’s comments on Fr Hamel’s murder were very mysterious-Does the Holy Father believe that ISIS is really a front for something else?, Catholic Herald, by Fr Alexander Lucie-Smith, 29 Jul 2016

Jesus (Matthew):
 “.. 34 Do not think that I have come to send peace on earth: I did not come to send peace, but a sword. 35 For I have come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. 36 And a man's foes shall be those of his own household."

391 AD:
“Theophilus Patriarch of Alexandria released his monks to attack pagans who had occupied the Serupium, temple to Serapis, centre of an important library and lecture halls the museion, academy of arts and sciences founded in the 3rd century BC by King Ptolemy I. The Monks attacked the pagans, the argument was the pagans were secretly worshiping in underground sanctuaries, and this was against the laws recently passed by the Emperor Theodosius I.

The pagans objected and occupied the Serupium and the museion to protect them and the monks and a large Christian crowds, really a rabble, it would be equivalent to the old mob in the early Roman Empire. They stormed into these buildings smashing the statues, destroying the papyrus scrolls then the fighting spread across the city of Alexandria. Of course the Imperial army did nothing the population was maddened over the issue. They broke in carted off the cult statues to be melted down, they were turned into cookery, they were turned them into liturgical objects, for the use by Christians. Cult statues such as the great phallus of Priapus one of the famous fertility Gods was paraded around and cast into the streets as an absolutely disgusting idol Christians would have nothing to do with.

The result of this attack on the Serupium and museion was that classical Alexandria was essentially destroyed and Christian Alexandria emerged. Scholars and popular writers have viewed this destruction as a turning point, and there is a good reason to do so, the pagans that witnessed it, witnessed this destruction were absolutely intimidated and there are reports of conversions on the spot.

The Christian mob led by the monks destroyed these cult statues, nothing had happened. In addition the entire action although not ordered by the Imperial Government certainly the Emperor Theodosius I approved. And it is the climax to a series of legislation issued by Theodosius I who came to the throne in 379 AD who would forever ban the pagan sacrifices and also impose unity in the Imperial church.  .. The Christians finally destroyed the pagan sanctuaries, where essentially between 391-414 wiped out that elite class that provided the neo-platonic philosophers.”

The Fall of the Pagans and the Origins of Medieval Christianity, Professor Kenneth W. Harl

And before this were any Christians with Roman/Greek supporters who were even teaching Christians in their own Platonic schools, in Roman armies dying for the Emperor-Roman culture, determining Christians as a culture peaceful and only seeking friendship and harmony with Other-pagans? After this what happened and how is this any different to a Islamic/Muslim culture exhibiting exactly the same behavior regards Other-pagans now? And importantly what evidence have you that the methodology of imposition will not be the same, the outcome in time as we see being played out in the Turkey purge will not be in time the same? Avoidance when so much is at stake is really a good strategy for such a  conflict. And clearly the bloody bodies in our streets determine it a inter-cultural conflict for control of space political/social.
Why should Other-Pagans determine the following statements with any less disgust given the reality, the bloody bodies in the streets, the significantly different political/social paradigms being imposed and attempted to be imposed upon humanity

391AD Christian Mother and Father of man killed fighting in Roman army abuse Alexandria Egyptian Other-pagan questioning Christian loyalty.


2016 Muslim Mother and Father of man killed fighting in Western army abuse Western Other-pagan for questioning Muslim loyalty.


particularly with the Muslim statement as the son was killed as a direct consequence of his own and parents cultures inherent terror-genocide construct? One or more acts of individual bravery in an Other army will not stop the terror-genocide emanating from the Muslim culture to kill its own as it did not stop the destruction of the Roman/Greek pagan civilisation
.

Please Explain: Nazi (Hitler-Mein Kampf) & Muslim (Mohammed-Quran) Cultural Codex Construct of Other. Why it is One Is and One Is-Not. Yet both = "I don't mean participated, I mean observed."


M
ohammed Quran006.049 But those who reject our signs,- them shall punishment touch, for that they ceased not from transgressing. 

008,012 Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them.

003.028 Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from God…

003.004 Then those who reject Faith in the Signs of God will suffer the severest penalty, and God is Exalted in Might, Lord of Retribution."

2015 AD:
"Enough is enough. It is time to speak out. 

“Islam is innocent” is an incomplete sentence. Introspection is needed, for, if we shy away from reality, the alternative will be more images like those we witnessed last Tuesday night, when brave Lt. Muath Al Kasasbeh was burnt to death in a cage. 

The inconvenient truth that is overlooked or willfully ignored by apologists for the indefensible is the fact that Wahabism, the cult of mediaeval austerity founded by Ibn Abdul Wahab (1703-1792), has over the last half century been exported to every mosque and school throughout the Muslim world until it completely enveloped mainstream Sunni Islamic teachings. 

Wahabism has entirely replaced, and become, Sunni Islam; the two cannot be told apart anymore. Some Wahabist teachings, which have permeated the air we breathe in the Muslim world, are simply irreconcilable with decent human values, especially the ones that declare that every non-Wahabist is a disposable body whose bloodletting is unproblematic."
‘We have a problem’ by Zaid Nabulsi The Jordan Times Feb 10, 2015

"Intellectuals from Saudi Arabia and Jordan to Egypt and Morocco are slamming Muslim leaders and clerics for ignoring the problems of Muslim society and dismissing terror attacks with faulty platitudes such as the oft-repeated, “Not in Islam’s name.”
Another Saudi journalist, Muhammad Aal Al-Sheikh, argues in the daily Al-Jazirah that groups like IS are a faithful representation of Islamic texts that are no longer relevant today and for that reason Muslim law urgently needs updating.

“We cannot dismiss their actions by saying that they ‘do not represent Islam’ when most of their actions originate in books from our past heritage, [books] that dealt with matters of the day in accordance with the conditions and norms of that period, which are different from the conditions and norms of our own period,” he writes.

Writing that global Islam is mired in a “culture of ignorance, backwardness, and violence,” and that the “Arab world is rife with tyranny, poverty, death,” Al-Sheikh called for a “historic reconciliation between Islamic heritage and modern democracy.”"

Muslim Writers: Islam To Blame For Global Terror by DEBORAH DANAN
, 30 Jul 2016

The trouble is systems to change 'fundamentally' actually require the internal constructs to enable it to do so otherwise such a hope is a dangerous one indeed for humanity inclusive of adherents themselves, for even if it was possible which frankly given there is no strategy for doing so Other than continued calls of the 'good' either that the behavior are not reflective of the 'real' Islamic/Muslim culture with terror-genocide increasing not diminishing after each pronouncement, or increasing claims even by Muslims the behavior are reflective of Islamic/Muslim ethics-values-beliefs-methods “the reexamination of religious (Islamic/Muslim) texts” and “revoking the religious legitimacy of interpretations of religious texts permitting ‘killing in the name of God. Those texts and their interpretations..., requiring urgent “criticism, dismantling, additions, omissions," subsequently fails to detail how this can in reality be achieved - anyone can make these claims as to the truth the Islamic/Muslim culture are indeed responsible for terror-genocide against Other and always have been, accepting the statements as proof things will change, the Islamic/Muslim culture will change as a result is simply dangerous delusion give the history of such calls by individuals and groups in the past determining such views as to the innocence of the Islamic/Muslim culture or the necessity for Islamic/Muslim codex and cultural change have clearly failed. Good intentions will not save us as they never have before under the exact same paradigm.

It is also an invalid argument that 'modernity' determines any ideological abstract cultural codex (textual and exemplar (messianic) templates) invented by humans in the 'past' as 'no longer relevant today' for this present moment of time, nor is the claim such political/social abstracts determined in the past as they necessarily have to be relate to "conditions and norms of that (past) period, which are different from the conditions and norms of our own period,”  and therefore have no right to be analogised into time and space to inform behavior individual/group institutional in the present. Such an argument can be simply turned to determine all political/social abstracts void for any political/social abstract defining human relationships/behaviors, they are all mere inventions how ever well intended to form societies.

History and even in our own times shows us the folly of depending upon anyone's version of 'modernity' as it moves along as 'the' template, for all you are doing is seeking to replace one invention with another and as we have seen 'old' so called non-modernity abstract Islamic/Muslim inventions have even been tacked onto the 'modern' "norms of our own period" UN Human Rights charter - why not be honest if you believe the political/social construct you adhere to is in your view dangerous to humanity and even the adherents themselves change inventions. For tinkering with a cultural construct will not change the core attributes which have led to terror-genocide emanating from the culture in the first 
place if there are no internal abstracted justified and authorised means of doing so and why should you or humanity wait while the bloody body count rises?

And
 so it comes to pass ''for all who take the sword will perish by the sword as after they have slain Other they to in turn will be determined by such a codex as Other.' as we can see still in our streets 'monotheism faiths .. bashing one another' along with Other-pagans for not accepting as 'truth', divine dictate, significantly different ethics-morals-beliefs-motivation and methodology. So what inevitably happens, is happening? Am I a bigot, racist for demanding the culture be held to account to stop their altruistic enforcers/punishers increasingly as they have in the past appearing in humanities streets?

"Not surprisingly, religions tend to increase intolerance only when they are dominant."
People’s opium? Religion and economic attitudes, Luigi Guisoa, Paola Sapienzad, Luigi Zingalese, 2002

"Not surprisingly, religions tend to increase intolerance only when they are dominant." and there is no indication prior of building acts of terror determined a 'few' which does not portend worse to come?

No indication before the holocaust gets into full swing evidence of a culture's altruistic enforcers/punishers in the streets beginning on the well recognised road, recognised by those who have taken the trouble to challenge their sacred assumptions and check again the historic/social/psychological record/research? A cultural codex and dense network system which will prevent any 'reform' you believe will or actually does despite the evidence seek peace and harmony where such a culture becomes dominant in time by whatever means informs a diametrically opposed outcome? Obama is mistaken regards Indonesian and Turkish political/social regression in modernity terms? 


“ Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached. ”
The passage originally appeared in the "Dialogue Held With A Certain Persian, the Worthy Mouterizes, in Anakara of Galatia written in 1391 as an expression of the views of the Byzantine emperor Manuel II Paleologus, one of the last Christian rulers before the Fall of Constantinople to the Muslim Ottoman Empire, on such issues as forced conversion, holy war, and the relationship between faith and reason.”


Yet the reality of what certain 'monotheism faiths' categorisation engines inform, as for goodness sake we see examples of throughout history each and every day, is quite different and the 'sacred word' determines Other is not deserving of the same treatment as I, neighbor-innocent not being of the 'faith' are neither.

Please Explain: Nazi (Hitler-Mein Kampf) & Muslim (Mohammed-Quran) Cultural Codex Construct of Other. Why it is One Is and One Is-Not. Yet both = "I don't mean participated, I mean observed."


"Additional research suggests that negative information may more easily generalize to the outgroup (Paolini, Harwood, & Rubin, 2010). Our studies suggest that negative expectations prevent positive contact from leading to more favorable outgroup attitudes."
Positive Expectations Encourage Generalization From a Positive Intergroup Interaction to Outgroup Attitudes, September 24, 2014, Matthew P. Deegan, Eric Hehman, Samuel L. Gaertner, and John F. Dovidio 


"'Religion and Violence. Paradoxes of Religious Communication' argues that violence in religious systems is present in at least three forms: It is inherent to communication with the ‘‘sacred,’’ it is generated by processes of inclusion and exclusion, shaping religiously interpreted lifeworlds, and it is motivated or moderated by the respective semantics of religious narratives. The paper concludes that violence as a moment of hierophany (manifestation of the sacred ) is constitutive for the living experience in religious systems and cannot be eliminated entirely by moderating semantics."
'Religion and Violence. Paradoxes of Religious Communication', Ilja Srubar, 2016

"Baron and Spranca 1997; Fiske and Tetlock 2002; Tetlock 2003) suggests that people resist attempts to compromise sacred values no matter the cost to themselves or others. In the last decade or so, experimental work that goes beyond the morality of fairness and harm suggests that religious and transcendental beliefs consolidate “community” (Rozin et al. 1999), lead to “binding” (Graham et al. 2011), provide “unity motivation” (Ray and Fiske 2011), and mobilize parochial altruists, such as suicide bombers, to give their lives for the group (Ginges, Hansen, and Norenzayan 2009; cf. Atran 2003). .......
Sacred values are nonnegotiable preferences whose defense compels actions beyond evident reason, that is, regardless of calculable costs and consequences (Ginges et al. 2007). Identity fusion occurs when personal and group identities collapse into a unique identity to generate a collective sense of invincibility and special destiny (Swann et al. 2012). These two programs account for different aspects of intractable intergroup conflicts; however, here and in a companion article (Sheikh, Gómez, and Atran 2016), we argue that sacred values and identity fusion interact to produce willingness to make costly sacrifices for a primary reference groups even unto death, that is, sacrificing the totality of self-interests. "
The Devoted Actor, Unconditional Commitment and Intractable Conflict across Cultures, by Scott Atran Current Anthropology Volume 57, Supplement 13, June 2016

"Religious people trust others more, trust the government more, are less willing to break the law, and believe more in the fairness of the market, but they are more intolerant and they have less progressive attitudes toward women... the characteristics that make somebody attend religious services on a regular basis also make her more intolerant toward immigrants and people of other races. Even if religious people are more intolerant because of personal characteristics, it is hard to imagine that a community that attracts the intolerant would not breed further intolerance.....
The relation between religion and intolerance seems to be present in all religious denominations, both for religious upbringing and for attendance at religious services. Only Buddhists are more tolerant. The point estimates for Protestants and Catholics are very similar, while those of Muslims are much higher, and those of Hindus even higher. Actively religious Hindus are 29 percent more intolerant than non-religious people, Muslims 19 percent, actively religious Protestant and Catholics 7 percent more.
.. religious people of all denominations (except Buddhists) are more inclined to believe that people in need are lazy and lack will power. The effect is somewhat stronger for Protestants than for Catholics.
. Not surprisingly, religions tend to increase intolerance only when they are dominant."

People’s opium? Religion and economic attitudes, Luigi Guisoa, Paola Sapienzad, Luigi Zingalese, 2002

intolerant: not tolerant of views, beliefs, or behaviour that differ from one's own.
synonyms: bigoted, narrow-minded, small-minded, parochial, provincial, insular, blinkered, illiberal, inflexible, dogmatic, rigid, uncompromising, unforgiving, unsympathetic

My view is there is a fatal assumption inherent in Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (‘UDHR”) and it is this.


Also from our own rational systems of development we believe we will be able to 'rationally' come to an understanding with other cultures about the error of their 'sacred values' and the benefit of our own yet the very sociology-anthropology paradigm determines these worldviews can be significantly different and in essence it is about managing significant difference not seeking resolution to lead to a peaceful harmonious societal space which significant values difference preclude from occurring. Instead we are to 'grow confidently' with another's cultures terror-genocide and oppression of women.

We are to accept as a part of the multiculturalism para
digm underwritten be generation of insane sociologists we must accept endemic social hostility for a 'drink of mint tea and Turkish pita' , and to underline the kafkaesque nature of our circumstance its Western Other cultures fault as they are not integrating the Muslim culture into Western culture where by mere observation of not only the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex, it is forbidden unless for necessity reasons to have anything to do with Other, Islamic/Muslim leaders are proclaiming fatwas, directive, ruling on a point of Islamic law given by a recognized authority, such as the fatwa in Sydney Australian which stipulated Muslims must follow the Islamic/Muslim cultures codex sacred value direction Muslims should have little or nothing to do with Other. 

Is it any wonder  the "Outplayed: Regaining Strategic Initiative in the Gray Zone" report sponsored by the Army Capabilities Integration Center in Coordination with Joint Staff J-39/Strategic Multi-Layer Assessment Branch 
reveals the reality which has led inexorably to WWI. WWII, "profound and paralyzing risk-confusion" regards enemy cultures utilising "combinations of influence, intimidation, coercion, and aggression. At the same time,.. exploiting, free-riding on, or are propelled by the generalized erosion or outright failure of traditional political authority." the same elite philosophy driven policy of appeasement of enemy cultures, determining well constructed argument under a Western rational model will surely convince internal cultures tearing societies apart and external cultures battering Western democratic walls to accept the obvious benefits of the Western Worldview. The absolute arrogance of Western influencers-drivers of policy is breathtaking.

 
"The information ops component is how we extend our reach and how we can influence populations to reject the misshaped ideology and hatred they are offered by the insurgents. Successful information ops help the civilian population understand and accept the better future we seek to help build with them. Our Marine ground and air forces must have the tools and capabilities to get the message across in each block."
Future Warfare: The Rise of Hybrid Wars, By Lieutenant General James N. Mattis, USMC, and Lieutenant Colonel Frank Hoffman, USMCR (Ret.), 2005

Or worse we simply accept Muslim terror as a price we pay for the failed human abstract Freedom of Religion - failed if you believe having your children blown to bits by Muslims aggregate codex-development process is a failure of policy otherwise it is working perfectly.

"We have to grow with the threat, and we have to do it in a confident manner,” Professor Siracusa said. (Human Security and International Diplomacy)
Two Sydney schools in lockdown as police unions call for support against extremists 
SBS 20 OCT 2015

"We have to stop with this debate of neutrality and secularity in Belgium and recognise and accept our multicultural society in all its manifestations. Not just when we want to drink mint tea or eat Turkish pita." sociologist Corinne Torrekens, a specialist in Muslim communities at the Free University of Brussels."
Terror sparks integration debate in France, Belgium, DW, Elizabeth Bryant, Molenbeek/Sevran, 05.04.2016

"It's not a question of Muslims being integrated, it's that society isn't integrating Muslims," says Alexandre Piettre, a sociologist at the Societies, Religions and Secularism Group, a Paris-based think-tank.

Terror sparks integration debate in France, Belgium, DW, Elizabeth Bryant, Molenbeek/Sevran, 05.04.2016


Feminist Swedish Politicians Defends Migrant Rapists, ‘Worse’ When Western Men Do It by LIAM DEACON, 5 Jul 2016

Such
approach of a perception of common human rationality ignores a truth cultures imbue us with differing reactive tendencies regards perceived transgression against 'sacred values' correlated positively I would argue with the relative draconian nature of our codex and an inherent inability to even have a 'rational' discussion regards 'irrational' constructs-unable to be justified by empirical evidence i.e the subjugation of women to man's 'leadership' and sexual control.


"I am stunned to learn this," said Imtiaz Khan, a leader of the Awami League's Dhaka chapter and deputy secretary-general of the Bangladesh Olympic Committee.

"My son used to pray five times a day from a young age. There is a mosque just 25 feet from our home. He started going to prayers with his grandfather. But we never imagined this. There was nothing at home, no books or anything to indicate he was leaning that way."
Bangladesh attack: Shock over 'elite' Holey Cafe suspects BBC, 5-7-2016

"..children raised in religious households, who are perceived to be more empathetic and sensitive to justice, are in fact less altruistic to their own class mates .... children from religious households also differ in their ratings of deserved punishment for interpersonal harm (F(2, 847) = 5.80, p < 0.01, h2 = 0.014); this was qualified by significantly harsher ratings of punishment by children from Muslim households than children from non-religious households (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between children from Christian households and non-religious households.".
The Negative Association between Religiousness and Children’s Altruism across the World, November 05, 2015

"great emphasis placed on Muslims to see themselves as members of a community of true believers .., Muslims to see each other as part of a cohesive social whole .. deliberate individualism is seen as a threat to the order and coherence of society...parents devalue creativity as an important child quality.. intellectual autonomy and imagination ..a stumbling block toward the unconditional surrender required of pious Muslims." (Acevedo, Ellison, & Yilmaz, 2013)


"The relation between religion and intolerance seems to be present in all religious denominations, both for religious upbringing and for attendance at religious services. Only Buddhists are more tolerant. The point estimates for Protestants and Catholics are very similar, while those of Muslims are much higher, and those of Hindus even higher. Actively religious Hindus are 29 percent more intolerant than non-religious people, Muslims 19 percent, actively religious Protestant and Catholics 7 percent more.
. Not surprisingly, religions tend to increase intolerance only when they are dominant."

People’s opium? Religion and economic attitudes, Luigi Guisoa, Paola Sapienzad, Luigi Zingalese, 2002

Further
we have the insidious how long is a piece of string marginalisation excuse for terror Other are to blame for their own demise clearly evidence exists each claim of marginalisation is contradicted by the reverse occurring. The reality comes back to the codex-development-status anxiety in a dense network where holding to the true-perfect believer status and the justified-authorised methodology framing behavior leads to heightened aggression. The fact is this as we all exist in what are hierarchical status based societies marginalisation is a fact of life for all of us, it will be found. That is not to argue marginalisation does not occur in an oppressive form but the point is relatively do Other cultures inform the same terror-genocide behavior if not marginalisation cannot be the core contributing factor.

"Officials said some of the attackers came from wealthy families, having attended top schools or universities in Dhaka or Malaysia, and at least one was the son of a top politician."
Dhaka gunmen were 'elite', 'educated' young men, RNZ, 7-5-2016

"We
find that aggression is generally not a maladjusted reaction typical of the socially marginal; instead, aggression is intrinsic to status and escalates with increases in peer status until the pinnacle of the social hierarchy is attained."
R Faris, D Felmlee - American Sociological Review, 2011

"The time has come for us to be honest with ourselves and indeed each other. The radicalisation that breeds terrorism is not conducted in the bush at night. It occurs in the full glare of day in homes, in madrasas and in mosques with rogue imams. We must ask the question — where are the parents and families (communities, education and religious institutions) of those who are being radicalized?" said Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenya's president "Our task of countering terrorism has been made all the more difficult by the fact that the planners and financiers of this brutality are deeply embedded in our communities."

"A Garissa-based official said the government was aware Abdullahi, a former University of Nairobi law student, had joined the militant group al Shabaab after graduating in 2013."
Kenya says son of a government official was among gunmen in Garissa attack 
by EDITH HONAN GARISSA, Kenya — Reuters Published Sunday, Apr. 05 2015

The following is what we are being asked to accept by our political/social elite and they are surprised-shocked large segments of their citizenry are searching for a way to bring peace and security back to their streets and hold these inept dangerous cultural gatekeepers to account for enabling the unleashing of a culture's terror-genocide into their societal space.

‘We cannot eliminate entirely the risk of terrorism any more than we can eliminate the risk of any serious crime.’ said Neville Chamberlain British Prime Minister in 1938 ‘Humanity simply have to make political concessions to cultures delivering terror-genocide against Other cultures, seek to understand and respect their ideology and ignore the bloody bodies and those missing in the streets and ‘grow confidently' with Nazi terror.’.

"According to the Pew Research Center, religious hostilities reached a six-year high in 2012, with a third (33%) of countries in the high category, up from 20% just six years earlier.

The Islamic world is disproportionately affected. More than one-in-two (57%) Muslim-majority countries have high religious hostilities, more than double that of other countries (25%), as shown in the chart to the left.

Although religious hostilities affect countries throughout the world experience, Muslim-majority countries consistently have higher levels of a range of religious hostilities than other countries and by wide margins. For instance, Muslim-majority countries are more than three times more likely than other countries to have religion-related war, terror or sectarian violence"

09/22/2014 Source data PEW Research Center - Commentary Weekly Number Brian J. Grim, Ph.D.

You are asking fellow citizens to 'grow confidently' with such a cultures terror-genocide with political/social codex constructs clearly visible before us informing increased social hostility as it always has, 'accept our multicultural society as, designed by our university 'only ask the questions we allow you to' sociology departments, in all its manifestations inclusive of terror genocide and tragic outcomes for women because surely a 'drink of mint tea or Turkish pita is worth it' I for one believe such a request is sickening and dangerous. In fact I believe the contributors to the "Outplayed: Regaining Strategic Initiative in the Gray Zone" report determining the political/social elite as suffering from "profound and paralyzing risk-confusion"  is rather too generous.

Clearly the policy is leading inexorably to the past terror-genocide in both directions as cultural gatekeepers imprisoned by an abstract utopian view of society attempts to destroy their own cultures heritage values-beliefs and methodology and accept endemic terror-genocide in both directions as the price their citizens pay for the privilege, seeking to blame anyone except themselves for the broken bodies and lives in their streets. How the 'good' enforce so effectively the 'Tranquillity of Silence' and lead humanity in the appeasement of cultures of infamy into hell once again. 

“Extremist groups, whatever their orientation, are gaining ground in Germany,” Thomas de Maiziere, the interior minister, said.
“Security forces observed not just a rise in membership but also an increase in violence and brutality.”

Extremist violence increasing in Germany, warns report,  The Telegraph, Justin Huggler, berlin, 28 JUNE 2016

Blaming the Press for anti-Muslim violence in the streets is the last refuge of a scoundrel as the reactive violence against Muslims is inevitable outcome of the political elite and its instruments such as the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) actively lying about the culpability of the Islamic/Muslim culture for the violent callous uncaring adherents the Islamic/Muslim families-communities and institutions systemically send into humanities streets -  these institutions such as ECRI are the generators of social hostility in both directions. Of course what will happen if a culture of terror-genocide is unleashed by a Other cultures own political-social elite against their own citizens?

Pressing Matters, A group headed by John Bolton said an anti-racism task force blamed the press for anti-Islam violence. Arturo Garcia, Snopes.com, 20-11-2016  

Recruitment and Radicalization among US Far-Right TerroristsReport to the Office of University Programs, Science and Technology Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Published November 2016

And why is this the case it is because the Western cultural gatekeepers under dangerous assumptions all cultures inform the same inherent risk and the altruistic enforcers of a culture are 'sick' criminals not what they really are cultural agents has allowed and continues to do so a culture with an inherent cultural codex terror-genocide construct within their societies to inform the inevitable.

Islamist extremists hide huge stockpile of weapons near German mosque, Express, By KATIE MANSFIELD, Jun 29, 2016

This is a culture where inevitably the adherents are the victims and perpetrators from the same family as both utilise the exact same cultural codex where both will always exist in the same behavoral variance generation after generation. You subject your children to such obvious heinous contrusts regards Other what do you think will happen?

Istanbul attack: Tunisian killed 'searching for IS-linked son', BBC, 30/6/2006

A War of Brothers in Iraq: ‘I Will Kill Him With My Own Hands’, NYT, By TIM ARANGO and FALIH HASSAN, JUNE 18, 2016

Saudi Twins Allegedly Murdered Mother After Being Stopped From Joining ISIS

World | Reuters | Updated: July 06, 2016

Each in turn will be found wanting along with Other, humanity really wants to retain such a ethic-belief methodology recipe for tragedy in our midst to continue to inform the same?

To whom it may concern: Time for a Royal Commission to determine if it is possible for the Islamic/Muslim culture to ‘reconcile itself with modernity' so as to prevent terror-genocide against Other cultures



".. the character of society flows from the intellectual forms which predominate in it."
A Dictionary of Sociology, Oxford UNiversity Press, 2009


"..forms and consequences of the development of the modern state system, its political
and (international) legal forms of organisation and the intellectual forms in which it is reflected."

War, the State and International Law in Seventeenth-Century Europe, Olaf Asbach, Peter Schröder, 2010


'The culture industry intentionally integrates its consumers (citizens) from above.' utilising cultural "intellectual forms" which "predominate in" societal space, subject to adaptation relative to the political/social power each cultural "intellectual form" are able to impose on the Other, the '..culture industry undeniably speculates on the conscious and unconscious state of the millions towards which it is directed, the masses are not primary, but secondary, they are an object of calculation; an appendage of the machinery. The customer (citizen) is not king, as the culture industry would have us believe, not its subject but its object.'. As relative cultural social/political power temporally changes so does the negotiated hybrid "intellectual form" reflected in state systems and policy.
Adapted from THEODOR ADORNO, "The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture", London: Routledge, 1991

In other words those promising Sharia law or any other Islamic/Muslim construct will never be reflected within a Western Democratic state systems or policy are lying if they allow the Islamic/Muslim "intellectual form"  to remain in societal private and public spheres. It is a promise which they can never fulfill, and if one looks out into societal space the cultural norms an anathema to notions of Modernity developed Liberty and Equality are already stalking the streets with bloody bodies already evidence of the cultural methodology to be utilised to leverage political 
power.

"Muslim communities in Australia have been quietly practising sharia law in negotiating divorces, disadvantaging women in custody and property arrangements."
Sharia law used to settle divorces in Muslim community, The Australian, JACQUELIN MAGNAY, GINA RUSHTON, December 23, 2015

"Two Sydney children have been placed into foster care and their 17-year-old brother reluctantly permitted to live with his violent father after their Lebanese-born mother cited “Islamic law” as the reason she was unable to care for them."
Sharia law ‘affecting court rulings’, REBECCA URBAN, The Australian, September 5, 2016

"..The Australian also reported Muslim families have been requesting the Family Court authorise agreements based on sharia principles rather than Western law."

Susie O’Brien: Worrying signs sharia law is creeping inSusie O’Brien, Herald Sun, September 5, 2016