No Biology/Culture Ideology has a Right to Demand Absorption of their Systemic Terror-Genocide

The Biology-Culture-Ideology-Language Nexus in the Moral Evolution of Palestinian Societies: Transitions from Byzantine Palaestina (550 CE) to Contemporary Palestine (2025 CE) Introduction The framework articulated by Ellis and Solms (2018) posits that human cognition and behavior arise from the interplay of evolutionarily conserved subcortical emotional systems—termed "hard-wired"—and the neocortex's plasticity, which enables "soft-wired" adaptations shaped by environmental interactions. This model rejects innate cognitive modules, including linguistic acquisition devices, emphasizing developmental processes wherein primary affective circuits guide modular emergence through experiential contingencies. Applied to the biology-culture-ideology-language nexus, this framework elucidates how preconceptional ecologies (e.g., ancestral stressors), epigenetic modifications, genetic predispositions, familial transmissions, peer dynamics, communal norms, and institution...

Analysis and Critique of Ellis and Solms' Perspective on the Nature/Nurture Dichotomy: Implications for Inter-Systemic Risks in Biology-Culture-Ideology-Language Nexuses Introduction The provided excerpt from Beyond Evolutionary Psychology: How and Why Neuropsychological Modules Arise by George Ellis and Mark Solms (2018) encapsulates a pivotal intervention in the longstanding nature-nurture debate. It posits that human cognition and behavior emerge from an interplay between evolutionarily conserved biological substrates—particularly primary emotional systems—and the brain's plasticity, which enables adaptive responses to physical, ecological, and social environments. Central to this argument is the distinction between "hard-wired" subcortical structures and "soft-wired" neocortical modules shaped by developmental interactions. A key assertion is the rejection of innate cognitive modules in the neocortex, including Noam Chomsky's language acquisition ...