'Australian government should be favourable to 'uncontroversial' Afghanistan troop request'? Why should we send more citizens to die for no reason other than...

“There are no safeguards provided by nature against employment of thoroughly inappropriate concepts by communities who are self-harming, apparently wilfully, but actually without realising it.
..in Afghanistan in the 2000’s, although one may condemn apparent intellectual and political shortcomings on the NATO side, it is rather more persuasive to argue that no measure of official comprehension of the mixture of difficulties encountered would have served well enough to fuel substantial progress in Afghan security. There are some political missions that cannot achieve success with any bearable burden of military effort, and prudence in policy and strategy is needed to prevent forlorn attempts to achieve the impossible.”
The Future of Strategy, Colin S. Grey, 2015

 "Pathological altruism is found in any pattern of altruistic behavior that results in severe harm to oneself or others. However, the pathological altruists thinking is also irrational and distorted. That is to say, his or her thinking appears to be characterised by a suspension of logic and reason and respect to the outcomes of their actions.

Pathological altruism victimizes the altruists themselves, as well as those in their path."
Pathological Altruism, Oxford University Press, 2012

“Convincing threatened populations that we are the winning side, developing genuine partnerships with them, demonstrating that we can protect them from the guerrillas and that their best interests are served by cooperating with us is the critical path in counterinsurgency, because insurgents cannot operate without the support – active, passive, or enforced – of the local population (Kilcullen 2010, p. 4)”

If the population rejects the partisans and lends its full support to the struggle against them, no partisan problem will exist” Colonel Reinhard Gehlen 1941 (Kilcullen 2010, p. 6)

"If the post-purge (surge) behavior remains what it was, it means:
3. That the population is deeply and genuinely attached to the insurgents cause. This is far more serious, for it shows the extent the ideological handicap and how far the counterinsurgent must go in the way of reforms if he wants to win support of the population....

Counterinsurgency Warfare David Galula., 1964

“In any situation, whatever the cause, there will be a minority for the cause, a neutral majority, and an active minority against the cause.”
Counterinsurgency Warfare, Theory and Practice, David Galula, 1964

My view is the 
David Galula counterinsurgency law of separation of population from the insurgent may work only in the case of an ideology foreign to the existent biology/culture ideology nexus being forced upon it-such as Marxist-Leninism. Otherwise the population will never be separated from the insurgents for they are the insurgents the biology/culture ideology nexus determines there is no such thing as innocence, "a neutral majority", only a biology/culture ideology interlinked clusters dissimulating with the "minority (cluster) against the cause" reflecting Others biology/culture ideology constructs back at them inextricably linked by commonly sourced and understood codex precept explicit/implicit categorisations to the silent-acquiescing not 'neutral' majority the reason being from both floors the radical altruist walk imbued with the motivation, justified and authorized method of identifying-dealing with internal deviants and Other biology/culture ideologies on the borders. 

One can see with the Chinese Communists reverting to Confucianism, Daoism, tenets of ancient war strategists and ancient Chinese Imperial symbols and rationale for geographical demands, as well as Putin’s rediscovery of Christian Orthodox religion and ancient Russian Imperial symbols and rationale for geographical demands. Both Marxist-Leninist derived elites realized to retain social/political sovereignty they had to shift core social/political constructs back to the existent Chinese Russian biology/culture ideology. There are in my opinion only lulls between reassertion of the dominant underlying biology/culture ideology unless one is willing to expend the time (possibly centuries i.e. Christianity’s destruction of the Platonist Greek-Roman culture) energy and resources to systematically replace a biology/culture ideology representing an existential threat. In the case of Muslim biology/culture ideology given its clear intent to be rid of Other biology/culture ideologies it will not be an option. So the existence of any number of Muslims, Nazis, Chinese Communists, etc professing beliefs against the 'cause' is normal it simply leads to the question. So what? What is the result on the ground, terror, genocide, military expansionism, political/social subjugation/exclusion.....

What is being delivered by the existence of the biology/culture ideology as a whole, from which conception-death development floors  are these altruistic reinforcers/punishers/aligners walking from, what happens when the proportion of the biology/culture ideology increases as a percentage of society populations. Research has shown minorities dissimulate as to their true intent, albeit some will possibly believe what they are saying is a true reflection of their biology/culture ideology true intent,  until they have the numbers, resources, social/political power to enforce their worldview rationale model on those around them. It is therefore incumbent upon societies to look at the facts what has happened to Other and even to the adherents of such a biology/culture ideology in the past and present this is the real measure of a biology/culture ideology threat, not some abstract political construct which prevent societies making such evaluations. What happens in societies where there legal social systems have been adopted what happens with the human security variables?   

Given the “partisans” “insurgents” are of the population, representing as altruists the cause of the population, willing in some cases to sacrifice their lives for a cause, which is of the population, what determines a population will be convinced their cause is not worth Other cultures pushback and cost of their own culturally developed altruists making sure the population keep to the ethic-moral social/political imperatives underwriting the cause for which the population is willing to sacrifice altruists lives? For as we know with more certainty than most ideas we hold, not all populations will be convinced you will win, more importantly do not want you to win and also as with Muslim “partisans” “insurgents” there is a significant element which is global, local-populations are not only subject to or assisted in their cause by just local altruists.

What single metric may inform you, you are wasting the lives and wealth of your citizens and simply feeding a culture which thrives on the resources war waged by powerful external powers intent on ‘winning’ the population, enable the population to obtain so as to be better able to continue the conflict to keep the resources flowing, and in the future end-game despite all the precious lives and wealth expended by powerful external powers intent on ‘winning’ the population are inevitably destroyed by the population as they always have in the past when powerful powers (cultures) become so conceited their worldview 'civilised' soft power attractiveness and hard power military organisational might surely will 'win' in time. You see they own time you have borrowed yours.

"..meta-analysis summarizes 113 research reports worldwide (121 cross-sectional and 7 longitudinal studies) on age differences in ethnic, racial, or national prejudice among children and adolescents. Overall, results indicated a peak in prejudice in middle childhood (5–7 years) followed by a slight decrease until late childhood (8–10 years)."
Development of ethnic, racial, and national prejudice in childhood and adolescence: A multinational metaanalysis of age differences, T Raabe, A Beelmann - Child development, 2011

“. children are sharp eyed, lacking in empathy, and willing to commit atrocities their elders would shrink from.”
Kilcullen, D 2010, Counterinsurgency, Oxford University Press.

"KABUL, Afghanistan — The sermon at the mosque in Kabul’s diplomatic quarter on Friday sounded a familiar but disquieting theme.

“You have disrespected the feelings of 1.8 billion Muslims and all that they hold sacred,” the imam, Muhammed Ayaz Niazi, bellowed, addressing the American forces in Afghanistan. “Those who have committed this grave crime are trying to test our people, to see if they are dead or alive. We promise to defend our values, defend our religion, defend our soil.”

This time, the rage was over a leaflet dropped on homes in Parwan Province, north of Kabul, on Tuesday night. The postcard- sized leaflets showed a lion, representing the American-led coalition forces, chasing a dog, an animal seen as dirty in Islamic tradition, wrapped in the Taliban flag.

The problem? The writing on the flag, in large letters, is the text most sacred to Muslims: the shahada, the foundational declaration of faith in God."
Afghan Anger Simmers Over U.S. Leaflets Seen as Insulting Islam, NYT, By MUJIB MASHAL, FAHIM ABED and FATIMA FAIZI, SEPT. 8, 2017

When you fight a civil war within another cultures space you are fighting for the continuing existence of both value systems which exist in that space the one you believe you are fighting against and the one you believe you are fighting for, as inevitably the flag (ethics social/political method) both wrap themselves in are derived from the exact same values social/political method cultural source, which invariably determines you the enemy to be exploited and destroyed in the very same codex to which both sides of the civil war adhere. 

You are not fighting to defend your own values systems, 'Girls going to school.' for even if such a framework survives the underlying cultural categories will still apply. Education has a positive affect but not in the way you own culture envisages, you have just made a culture more effective in delivering their worldview not yours. You see research determines it is the mothers who have a great deal to do with the level of their children's aggression and women despite the negative constructs relative to men tend to be greater devotees of a cultures faith-ideology.

 "Children’s voices are heard “Defend Islam don’t be an infidel”"
 Flawed Justice After a Mob Killed an Afghan Woman, New York Times, by Pulitzer Prize winner ALISSA J. RUBIN, DEC. 26, 2015

"The man was living in Melbourne on a bridging visa at the time of the wedding, having fled Myanmar as an asylum seeker."

"DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — The Saudi government continues to tolerate hate speech by some clerics against minority groups while public school textbooks in the kingdom still include language that discriminates against other forms of worship, a new study by Human Rights Watch said Tuesday."

This is what Western soldiers are fighting and dying for, the right of a culture to continue to deliver a worldview proven by research and commonsense to be significantly different than their own, nothing less nothing more.

It is a subconscious act on the part of the US military establishment determining the flag they are fighting against is the exact same flag they are fighting for. As in Vietnam it is a war which can never be won by a Western culture as it exists now, and there lies the danger, acceptance of the unacceptable, terror and the related blasphemy paradigm as normative-prescriptive within Western civilisations streets. A complete disaster-failure becomes victory- and the Western policy elite are preparing the ground to declare victory over the wasted sacrifice of fellow citizens and massive redirection of wealth better invested elsewhere.

"Former Chief of Army Peter Leahy, who now heads Canberra University's National Security Institute, said the new approach was an improvement and would "give them a chance to win but it won't happen quickly".
"Potentially this is decades," he said. "It's not going to be a military victory. That's the best element of the strategy is he's talking not just about military but diplomatic and economic power as well.""

"win" = be victorious in, triumph in, take first prize in, achieve success in, be successful in, prevail in..

I preface my argument by stating I stand against any culture secular or religious systemically delivering terror-genocide against Other even my own. I reject the notion religion is not politic, as it is a clear contradiction of reality historic and current.

"Religious thought does not exist in a vacuum; it both shapes politics and is shaped by politics."
Understanding Japan: A Cultural History, Professor Mark J. Ravina, Emory University, 2015

"Religions, especially, historically as well as currently, are recognized to be chronically implicated in this discord and violence, directed at those beyond their artificially defined boundaries of theological doctrine, and, as often, towards those claiming common religious identities but who have fragmented into sectarian factions and conflict (Mlodinow 2012, 164)."

"MOSUL, Iraq (AP) — Even as the Islamic State group’s rule is being torn down in Iraq, the seeds are there for it — or a successor extremist group — to rise again one day.

It’s a disquieting fact: There are those among Iraq’s Sunni Muslim minority who find some good in the group, though they denounce the militants for suffering inflicted during their nearly three-year rule.

Listen to the words of a young Iraqi who was impressed by an Islamic State cleric — a compassionate man, Mowafy Abdul-Qader said, recalling his “sweet demeanor” as he gave lessons on Shariah law.
“He taught me like he was an angel from heaven. He was accurate and righteous,” Abdul-Qader said, speaking at a camp for Iraqis driven from their homes during the past year’s fighting to uproot the militants in northern Iraq. “Because of people like him, I sometimes felt I was actually living in a real caliphate.”

In nearly two dozen interviews with Sunnis living in the camps of the displaced, The Associated Press heard many variations on the same theme: IS was too brutal and individual members were corrupt, but its goals to restore morality and faith were worthy.........

But then he, like almost all the others interviewed, said he supported in principle the group’s imposition of dress codes for women in public, saying it boosted public morality. Before the militants came, women in Mosul sometimes dressed unacceptably, including wearing pants, Abdul-Qader lamented.

School headmaster Mohammed Jassim said IS revived interest in religion, getting people to learn more about prayer, fasting and charity. “Young men filled the mosques after years of religious decline,” he said.

But “the actions of many of them ran contrary to what they preached,” he said.

“They taught people a great deal about our religion,” said another camp resident, Abed Hamad. He said people began to read and debate Hadeeth, the stories and sayings of the prophet Muhammad that alongside the Quran are used as a basis of Islamic law.

Several praised the group’s poets and singers of religious anthems called “anasheed” in Arabic. The songs were played at kiosks known as “media centers” in IS-held areas, accompanied by videos of fighting and militants killing captives or suspected spies.

IS “anasheed” extolled the virtues of jihad, ridiculed enemies and eulogized fallen fighters, all in the elevated poetic language of traditional religious hymns.

Those songs are among the traces IS left behind, and new followers might one day rally round them, much as neo-Nazis embrace Nazi regalia and white nationalists fly Confederate flags.

In one camp for the displaced, a 9-year-old boy could sing an anthem off the top of his head. It was a light-hearted children’s tune, but with bloody lyrics listing cities the militants captured: “The soldiers of the caliphate are brave, the army of the heretics ran away, and now we have Fallujah, Mosul and Tikrit.”"

I can make an empathic prediction with relative certainty, victory will not be achieved in decades or centuries in Afghanistan and can make an emphatic comment, shaping policy by promising a 'win'-victory where one is not possible, or a victory which bears no resemblance to the values Australian citizens, if they were actually made aware would be willing to die for, or accept the unfathomable grief such loss brings, strikes me to say the least as a severe  error of judgement. Particularly as there is no evidence provided to validate such a claim as 'win'-victory in a sense any Australian would believe worth dying for or sacrificing their children to, in fact I would argue there is sufficient evidence to determine such a claim has no basis in fact.

In Vietnam Australia found as did the US they were not fighting for their values of freedom from tyranny as they both perceived they had in WWI and WWII they were fighting and dying to protect the resident South Vietnamese cultures social/political elites values social/political method which turned out to be diametrically opposed to the Australian-US definition of peace, freedom and prosperity.

Both Australia and the US are making exactly the same mistake in Afghanistan and elsewhere and will suffer the exact same fate, wasted precious citizens lives and wealth to protect an in situ culture whose ethical-moral-value-belief social/political method rational are not only diametrically opposed to the Western notions of peace, freedom and prosperity, the same cultural rational determines the Australian and US cultures inherently evil and necessarily, justifiably should be subject to terror-genocide. Which the continuing insider attacks attest as a fact not fiction.

It is argued by some in time surely such a culture will with the guidance of, and on observing the moral fortitude and benefits of a secular democratic multicultural society will change its behaviour, for is it not the case these cultures holding archaic, medieval, notions which in time cannot stand against the modern? We are assured it will take decades of course but victory will be achieved, cultural behavior will not revert as it has before when we left the political/social/geographical space after our well won victory.

To say a "win", "be victorious" will be achieved without military victory in my view is the same logic as determining you do not need a plug to keep water in a bathtub.

                                           Human Aspiration Trilogy

There is a Human Aspiration Trilogy Peace (Absence of War), Freedom (Absence of Tyranny) and Prosperity (Absence of Poverty), I ask our Former Chief of Army Peter Leahy in regards to this Trilogy what does this "win" as he clearly declares as possible with an absence of military victory will look like for the Afghan people? And more importantly is it a vision worthy of the sacrifice of fellow Australians and of their wealth potentially better spent elsewhere?

Evidence Peter Leahy this 'win' can actually occur with or without a military victory so Australian lives will not be wasted upon the altar of your false hope?

Reality Check:
“For whatever psychology has, or has not, established, it is certain that the thoughts and actions of men are in great measure determined by their thoughts and actions in the past. ..
A nation, like man, is the creature of its past.”
THE REVOLUTIONARY IDEA IN FRANCE, 1789-1871, By Lord Elton, 1923.

'''Democracy is like a streetcar. When you come to your stop, you get off.'' Erdogan
The Erdogan Experiment, NYT, By DEBORAH SONTAG, MAY 11, 2003

"Even then, many distrusted his transformation. ''He's saying all the right things about Europe and moving westward,'' an American diplomat told me, ''but I fear he's like a wolf in sheep's clothing.'' Those who knew him well, though, took him at his word. ''He wanted to change the system, but the system changed him,'' said Rusen Cakir, one of Erdogan's biographers. Alaton said he had no concerns that Erdogan was a closet fundamentalist. ''He came to power partly because he had this religious platform, but he knows it's a dead end. He knows confrontation with the bureaucracy on religion would break him.'' One Turkish lawyer put it to me more cynically: ''He believes in profits, not prophets.''"
The Erdogan Experiment, NYT, DEBORAH SONTAG, MAY 11, 2003

'The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets, and the believers our soldiers.” Erdogan, December 1997

"From September Turkey will have a new education curriculum and this 38-year-old mother is among many parents who are worried. The changes affect first, fifth- and ninth-grade students, and the main controversy surrounds the exclusion of the theory of evolution from secondary education.
"In classes, nine- and 10-year-old students have been memorising prayers from the Koran. I believe religious education should be given at home, not in schools," said the woman, who did not want to be named, due to security concerns.
Other controversial changes include shortening the time allocated to studying the life of Turkey's secularist founder Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, an introduction to the concept of jihad and more classes on religion."
BBC News, Istanbul, 22 August 2017

"The first research of its kind to probe the practice within this tightly knit South Asian community, the study found that 80 per cent of Dawoodi Bohra women surveyed have undergone FGM and two of the study’s 18 Canadian participants said it happened within Canada’s borders."
Women in small Muslim sect say they have had FGM in Canada, By MICHELE HENRY, JAYME POISSON, Aug. 21, 2017

"Children’s voices are heard “Defend Islam don’t be an infidel”"

" Hundreds of other men watched, holding their phones aloft to try to get a glimpse of the violence, but never making a move to intervene. Those standing by included several police officers.

..then the enraged men below her picked up poles and planks of wood, and hit at her until she lost her grip and tumbled down.

Her face bloodied, she struggled to stand. Holding her hands to her hair, she looked horrified to find that her attackers had yanked off her black hijab as she fell. The mob closed in, kicking and jumping on her slight frame….
Children’s voices are heard “Defend Islam don’t be an infidel”
Men deliberate “What to do with the body.
Overturned Verdict
“If it’s violence, who is responsible for this violence? The guy who started the episode and encouraged the people to hit her? The guy chanting slogans who encouraged the people? Was it a blow from a stick that killed her? A stone? Was it that she was burned, or was it the car running over her?””
Flawed Justice After a Mob Killed an Afghan Woman, New York Times, by Pulitzer Prize winner ALISSA J. RUBIN, DEC. 26, 2015

"My faith is a completely a nonviolent faith." Muslim woman in her 40s
5. Terrorism and concerns about extremism, PEW Research, JULY 26, 2017

"Our religion teaches us never to kill or to hurt others. Islam teaches us peace, not violence. ... Real Muslims are not violent or bad.” – Muslim woman over 60" Muslim woman over 60
5. Terrorism and concerns about extremism, PEW Research, JULY 26, 2017

Quran: Surah 8 Al-Anfal - The Spoils of War
12 "Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): 'I am with you: give firmness to the believers: I will instil terror into the hearts of the unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their fingertips off them. '

14 "Thus (will it be said): 'Taste ye then of the (punishment) for those who resist Allah, is the penalty of the fire. '

15 "O ye who believe! When ye meet the Unbelievers n hostile array, never turn your backs on them."

17 "It is not ye who slew them; it was Allah: when thou threwest (a handful of dust) it was not thy act, but Allah's: in order that He might test the Believers by a gracious trial from Himself: for Allah is He who heareth and knoweth (all things)."

22 "For the worst of beasts in the sight of Allah are the deaf and the dumb – those who understand not."

23 "If Allah had found in them any good, He would indeed have made them listen: (as it is), if He had made them listen, they would but have turned back and declined (faith)."

29 "O ye who believe! If ye  fear Allah, he will grant you a criterion (to judge between right and wrong), remove from you (all) evil (that may afflict) you, and forgive you: for Allah is the Lord of grace unbounded."

37 "In order that Allah may separate the impure from the pure, with the impure, one on another, heap them together, and cast them into Hell. They will be the ones to have lost."

38 "Say to the unbelievers, if (now) they desist (from unbelief), there passed would be forgiven them; but if they persist, the punishment of those before him is already (a matter of warning for them)."

55 "For the worst of beasts in the sight of Allah of those who reject him: they will not believe."

56 "They are those with whom thou didst make a covenant, but they break their covenant every time, and they have not the fear (of Allah)."

59 "Let not the unbelievers think that they can get the better (of the godly): they will never frustrate (them)."

60 "Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies of Allah and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom Allah doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of Allah, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly."

65 "O Prophet! Rouse the Believers to fight. If there are twenty amongst you, patient and persevering, they will vanquish two hundred: if hundred, they will vanquish a thousand of the Unbelievers: for these are people without understanding."

66 "For the present, Allah hath lightened your (task), for He knoweth that there is a weak spot in you: but (even so), if there are hundred of you, patient and persevering, they will vanquish two hundred, and if a thousand, they will vanquish two thousand, with the leave of Allah: for Allah is with those who patiently persevere."

67 "It is not fitting for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had thoroughly subdued the land. Ye look for the temporal goods of this world; but Allah looketh to the Hereafter: and Allah is Exalted in might, Wise."

74 "Those who believe, and adopt exile, and fight for the Faith, in the cause of Allah as well as those who give them asylum and aid – these are (all) in very truth the Believers: for them is the forgiveness of sins and the provision most generous."

Quran: Surah 9 At-Tawbah The Repentance
1. "A (declaration) of immunity from Allah and his messenger, to those of the Pagans with whom ye have contracted mutual alliances –
2. Go ye, then, for four months, backwards and forwards, (as ye will), throughout the land, but know ye that ye cannot frustrate Allah (by your falsehood), but that Allah will cover with shame those who reject Him.
3. And an announcement from Allah and his Messenger, to the people (assembled) on the day of the Great Pilgrimage – that Allah and His Messenger dissolve (treaty) obligations with the Pagans. If then ye repent, it were best for you; but if ye turn away, know ye that ye cannot frustrate Allah. And proclaim a grievous penalty to those who reject Faith.
4. But the treaties are) not dissolved with those pagans with whom ye had entered into alliance and who have not subsequently failed you in aught, nor aided anyone against you. So fulfill your engagements with them to the end of their term: for Allah love of the righteous.
5. But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever you find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war). But if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practice regular charity, then open the way for them: for Allah is oft Forgiving, Most Merciful."

The reality of such Muslim dissimulations and explicit denunciation of non-Believers after each statement to honor treaties and alliances with completely standalone justification and authorisation of grievous harm drives a Muslim terror truck through any claims of  Muslim claims of "peace, not violence". For the proof lies explicitly in the absence of, and subjugation-terror of Other in any Muslim dominated space, as well as terror visited upon any space Muslims have access to.

“Although religious hostilities affect countries throughout the world experience, Muslim-majority countries consistently have higher levels of a range of religious hostilities than other countries and by wide margins. For instance, Muslim-majority countries are more than three times more likely than other countries to have religion-related war, terror or sectarian violence, ...”Pew Research 2012

The quotes from the Quran above determine whatever statements may be made also with determining alliances are of no consequence in the end-game.

Are the cultural values Australians will be defending worthy of their sacrifice?

"..children raised in religious households, who are perceived to be more empathetic and sensitive to justice, are in fact less altruistic to their own class mates .... children from religious households also differ in their ratings of deserved punishment for interpersonal harm (F(2, 847) = 5.80, p < 0.01, h2 = 0.014); this was qualified by significantly harsher ratings of punishment by children from Muslim households than children from non-religious households (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between children from Christian households and non-religious households.".
The Negative Association between Religiousness and Children’s Altruism across the World, November 05, 2015

Are the cultural development processes ratcheting up aggression, violence and terror Australians will be defending worthy of their sacrifice?

And so what do you do when you are confronted with evidence which significantly contradicts your worldview, of course you accept the evidence and change your worldview, and would not be so foolish as to persist in shaping damaging, even dangerous public policy outcomes? Alas even if we are skeptical and for good reason we continue down the same cultural wave path.

"Another problem was overcoming the president's skepticism that winning in Afghanistan was even possible."
A divide over US Afghan strategy, By GREG JAFFE AND PHILIP RUCKER | The Washington Post | Published: August 5, 2017

It is a ‘skepticism’ that even a 'half pager' knows implicitly is justified, dig up British Field Marshall Lord Roberts K.P. V.C. who will assure you the ‘skepticism’ is warranted. Trump's reaction is a sign of innate intelligence not stupidity, at least in one sphere.

I will explain, as it appears there is a mistaken impression by some that excessive amounts of potential power, soft or hard, held by a culture necessarily will translate into a successful outcome utilising any strategy lying around in a dusty cupboard.

"We must not be fooled by its (Islamic State-IS) hype. Its ideology is archaic, its use of the internet is very modern. ISIL (IS) has any more smartphones than guns, more twitter accounts than fighters." Malcolm Turnbull Australian Prime Minister, 2015

Cultures do not care if you think their ideological constructs are 'archaic', 'antiquated' 'contradict' or 'modern' they are as they are and will remain informing a cultures behavioural variance, inclusive of the knowing or unknowing dissimulating good and the altruists they systemically create to deliver terror-genocide, until the codex ideological constructs are deleted from a social/political space.

The cultural codex ideological constructs remain the behaviour remains. The failure of the absurd logic regards 'archaic' is to ask how old is the concept of Democracy is it older than the Islamic/Muslim codex constructs equalling as they must terror-genocide? In the past Islamic/Muslim culture had more Egyptian papyrus than swords and fighters, so what were Other spared? Is it not the specific unchanging cultural codex motivating content rather than the mode or speed of communication the real threat?

Social Psychology let alone history, or mere observation determines as a truth, allow a culture's Architect and Builder, a cultures codex (text and exemplar (messianic) template) and birth to death development process, systemically informing infamy across time and space, to remain in a social/political space by only dealing with the symptom, the cultures altruistic enforcers/punishers/aligners, declaring victory as each cultures altruist is 'defeated', 'contained', 'neutralised' is dangerous delusion as the culture dissimulates, adapts, discovers, improvises, overcomes-flows around and back into the social/political space utilising the same cultural justification, authorisation and adapted analogised method of dealing with Other.

"The Taliban controls places like Helmand, where the US and UK troops fought their hardest battles, pushing the drive toward peace and progress into reverse"
The war America can't win: how the Taliban is regaining control in Afghanistan, theguardian, by Sune Engel Rasmussen in Lashkar Gah, 3 August 2017

"..politics provides the enabling mechanism for community action.

Violence organised or other, always everywhere has some political meaning."
The Future of Strategy, Colin S. Grey, 2015

Ones child trafficker is another's parents school bus driver.

"The authorities told the AP that the children (27 boys between the ages of 4 and 15) were being taken to Pakistani madrassas to educate a new generation in the ways of the Taliban, with the intention of returning them to Afghanistan to enforce the same rigid interpretation of Islam practiced by the radical religious movement until its ouster by U.S.-led coalition forces in 2001.
The police called it child trafficking and threw the drivers and the only other adults, two men who organized the convoy, into jail.

But the parents said they wanted their children to study in Pakistan and had willingly sent them to Quetta, the capital of Pakistan’s sparsely populated Baluchistan province on the border with Afghanistan."

Although most of humanity would like to believe as human biology determines humanity as one, humanity can therefore be as one in peace and harmony, the reality is categorically, as the burning buildings, broken bodies and lives attest, a complete fallacy. This alas is the truth:

Biology Determines Our Human Hands Have the Same Constituent Parts as Other.
Culture Determines Our Human Hands Will Inform Differing Outcomes for Other.

"The use of force and violence is more commonplace and prevalent in some families, communities, religions, cultural/ethnic groups and societies based on the views and values about adult prerogatives with children espoused. They may also be based upon the sociopathy of the perpetrators."
Treatment of Complex Trauma Courtois/Ford 2016

"The Pakistani government has “failed to take significant action” to prevent those groups from threatening American and Afghan forces in neighboring Afghanistan, the State Department said last week in a report on terrorism."

"In the first place, ideologies (culture) provide a perspective, or 'lens', through which the world is understood and explained. People do not see the world as it is, but only as they expect it to be: in other words, they see it through a veil of ingrained beliefs, opinions and assumptions. Whether consciously or subconsciously everyone subscribes to a set of political beliefs and values that guide their behaviour and influence their conduct. Political ideas and ideologies thus set goals that inspire political activism. .... a, unifying set of political ideas and values can develop naturally within society, or it can be enforced from above in an attempt to manufacture obedience and exercise control. The clearest examples of such 'official' ideas have been found in fascist, communist and religious fundamentalist regimes."
Source: Political Ideologies Andrew Heywood 2012

"To-day psychology alone, and priori, before we had approached the evidence, would predispose us to expect these conclusions. For whatever psychology has, or has not, established, it is certain that the thoughts and actions of men are in great measure determined by their thoughts and actions in the past.
A nation, like man, is the creature of its past."
THE REVOLUTIONARY IDEA IN FRANCE, 1789-1871, By Lord Elton, 1923.

"Local officials in Faryab and Ghor provinces confirmed Taliban insurgents seized control of Kohistan district in Faryab and Taywara district in Ghor after engaging in fierce gunfights with security forces in the past 24 hours."
Taliban Seize Two Key Districts in Ghor and Faryab Provinces, TLO, By Sayed Sharif Amiri 23 JULY 2017

When we were young we learnt when building sand castles at the seaside the forces inherent in the ocean tide meant nothing in time would be left standing, we would have to go back and rebuild again and again. Although we clearly learnt from this experience if the underlying forces driving the behavior of the oceans are not altered it is a wasted effort and delusional to believe our sand castles will remain in place however well designed, yet some of us continue to believe cultural behavior against Other inherent in a cultures development process underwritten by their cultural codex (textual and exemplar (messianic) template) will change if we continue to build sand castles in their political/social physical geographic space. 

It is the same logic as determining the ocean will respect the fact we have spent our energy building the sandcastle and be our friend and respectfully withdraw to a safe distance. The tragedy of this delusion is the relative cost of building and destruction of our early sandcastles by the ocean tide bares no comparison to the terrible cost the families, communities and a nations citizens have to endure again and again by sending their own into a cultures maelstrom of terror-genocide against Other.

A maelstrom for we attempt to build the sandcastle not on partially dry sand but in the midst of a tide flowing in both directions as cultures with inherent terror-genocide constructs of Other such as the Muslim culture flow from one side to the other around the Islamic/Muslim normative ethics-morals-beliefs and method, not simply our own ethics etc being reflected back at us from one end of the Muslim behavioral variance where even those Muslims doing so in time will join the flow against Other actively or by their silence, not for Other.
Change the Architect and Builder or Change Nothing, as we continue to support the very culture informing our demise.

SMH, Fergus Hunter, 12-5-2017

'uncontroversial' Afghanistan troop request?

Why should we send more citizens to die for no reason other than to hold to a lie the 'moderate' peaceful and law abiding of a culture-religion are not responsible for the continuing violence-terror in Afghanistan, and even our own streets, against Other and even their own? 

A lie underwriting policy which means there is only ever a lull between declared victory of 'eradication' of the cultural 'few' threat and the inevitable resumption of violence as the so called 'moderate' peaceful and law abiding of a culture-religion create more of the 'few' to start once again.


"Religious thought does not exist in a vacuum; it both shapes politics and is shaped by politics."
Understanding Japan: A Cultural History, Professor Mark J. Ravina, Emory University, 2015

""Since the first Central Intelligence Agency paramilitary teams entered Afghanistan in November 2001, 2,350 service members have given their lives and almost $900 billion in taxpayers' money has been spent. Meanwhile, the country is less politically stable and less secure from all forms of insurgent and criminal predation," writes CFR's Micah Zenko." Being Honest About U.S. Military Strategy in Afghanistan, by Micah Zenko, February 9, 2017

“At worst, if terrorism is indeed rooted in the political pathologies of many Muslim societies, then military victories may not stay won unless those pathologies are cured – something that might take more energy and resources than this strategy would provide.”
Trump and Terrorism, US strategy after ISIS, Hal Brands and Peter Feaver, Foreign Affairs, March/April 2017

Taliban Take an Afghan District, Sangin, That Many Marines Died to Keep, NYT, TAIMOOR SHAH and ROD NORDLAND, MARCH 23, 2017

"Religions, especially, historically as well as currently, are recognized to be chronically implicated in this discord and violence, directed at those beyond their artificially defined boundaries of theological doctrine, and, as often, towards those claiming common religious identities but who have fragmented into sectarian factions and conflict (Mlodinow 2012, 164).

"Without the ceaseless pulsating heartbeat of our "categorization engine, we would understand nothing around us, could not reason in any form whatever, could not communicate to anyone else, and would have no basis on which to take any action. ....

every culture constantly, although tacitly, reinforces the impression that words are simply automatic labels that come naturally to mind and that belong intrinsically to things and entities"

Our current political/social elites dangerous ignorant policy=Our brave soldiers-citizens have suffered and died in Muslim cultural created battlefields to enable the same culture to continue to deliver the same at home and abroad. To continue, Why?

"The use of force and violence is more commonplace and prevalent in some families, communities, religions, cultural/ethnic groups and societies based on the views and values about adult prerogatives with children espoused. They may also be based upon the sociopathy of the perpetrators."
Treatment of Complex Trauma Courtois/Ford @2016

“Although religious hostilities affect countries throughout the world experience, Muslim-majority countries consistently have higher levels of a range of religious hostilities than other countries and by wide margins. For instance, Muslim-majority countries are more than three times more likely than other countries to have religion-related war, terror or sectarian violence, ...”
Pew Research 2012

"The culture in which one is immersed influences how one behaves towards others on all levels: and individual to another individual, as members of a group towards members of another group, as an individual or group member to the institutionalised social will. Implicit default assumptions about others influence individual cultural worldviews and habit which in turn shape the culture of child rearing that adults provide influencing the next generation and so on."
Neurobiology and the Development of Human Morality, Darcia Navais, 2014

"Just as cultural variation clearly dictates the language children eventually speak, cultural variation exerts significant and differential influences over mental, emotional, and social development of children. Every culture is characterized, and distinguished from other cultures, by deep-rooted and widely acknowledged ideas about how one needs to feel, think, and act as a functioning member of the culture. These beliefs and behaviors shape how parents rear their offspring. Culture helps to construct parents and parenting, just as culture helps to define mental health. Culture is also maintained and transmitted by influencing parental cognitions that in turn shape parenting practices. Whether culturally universal or specific, controls are in place to ensure that each new generation acquires culturally appropriate and normative patterns of beliefs and behaviors."
Parenting and child mental health: a cross-cultural perspective, Marc H. Bornstein, 3 October 2013

"A large body of research implicates families in the development and prevention of aggressive and violent behavior."
Family Influences on Aggression and Violence, Aggression and Violence: A Social Psychological Perspective, Labella, Madelyn H, Masten, Ann S, 2016

"Experiment 1 demonstrated that mothers had a significant impact on children's cognitive bias and fear. More precisely, children who had received a negative parental training displayed an increase in negative information search bias and fear, whereas children who had received a positive parental training showed an increase in positive information search bias and a decrease in fear. In Experiment 2, it was found that children's information search biases after working together with their mothers were predicted by their mothers' initial cognitive bias scores. These findings can be taken as support for the intergenerational transmission of cognitive biases from mothers to children."
Transmission of Cognitive Bias and Fear From Parents to Children: An Experimental Study,Danielle Remmerswaal, Peter Muris & Jorg Huijding, Pages 642-654, 06 Feb 2015

"Despite deeply conservative and gendered regulation, brutal violence, and widespread coverage of the group’s use of rape, more than 600 women have left Western countries to join Daesh. Researchers explain this recruitment primarily through women’s desire for romantic adventure, deception on social media, and anti-Western sentiment spurred by discrimination and violence in their home states. Using an original dataset of social media activity from seventeen Western female recruits between 2011-2015, we evaluate these arguments and offer a new explanation centered on a religious and political ideology that necessitates a physical hijra (migration) to Iraq or Syria. We find consistent evidence that anti-Western sentiment and ideological commitment drive women’s migration. This finding has valuable implications for counterterrorism policy and security studies, which tend to treat women’s mobilization as separate from general extremism. Our findings suggest female recruits should be taken seriously as motivated insurgents intent on establishing an Islamic caliphate."
Explaining Extremism: Western Women in Daesh, Meredith Loken University of Washington Anna Zelenz University of Washington, April 1, 2016

"There is a steadily growing body of evidence showing that parental modeling and threat information transmission can promote fear and anxiety in children."
Cognitive Bias as a Mediator in the Relation Between Fear-Enhancing Parental Behaviors and Anxiety Symptoms in Children: A Cross-Sectional Study, Lorraine Fliek, Pauline Dibbets,Jeffrey Roelofs,Peter Muris, Child Psychiatry & Human Development, February 2017, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 82–93

"The eight-year-old son of Australian ISIS terrorist Khaled Sharrouf has been filmed wearing a suicide vest and reciting threats to Australians. "

"• Parents do not have the confidence to argue against the articulate and forceful activists who seek to impose their views, for fear of being branded as disloyal to their faith or their community."
Schools face new curbs on extremism after Birmingham Trojan horse affair Patrick Wintour, Political editor The Guardian, Wednesday 23 July 2014

''The mosques are our barracks,/the domes our helmets,/the minarets our bayonets,/ and the believers our soldiers.” Erdogan, December 1997,….

''Democracy is like a streetcar. When you come to your stop, you get off.'' Turkish Muslim: President Erdogan
The Erdogan Experiment, NYT, By DEBORAH SONTAG, MAY 11, 2003

"We find that aggression is generally not a maladjusted reaction typical of the socially marginal; instead, aggression is intrinsic to status and escalates with increases in peer status until the pinnacle of the social hierarchy is attained...

We also find that aggression is influenced not so much by individual gender differences as by relationships with the other gender and patterns of gender segregation at school. When cross-gender interactions are plentiful, aggression is diminished."
Status Struggles, Network Centrality and Gender Segregation in Same- and Cross-Gender Aggression, Robert Faris, Diane Felmlee, American Sociological Review, February 2011, vol. 76 no. 1 48-73

"The findings of the study indicate that citizens (Hofstede and Hofstede (2005)) of Islamic countries share similar cultural values that vary significantly with those of the Western countries."Conceptualizing the Islamic Personality Model, Abdul Kadir Othman, Muhammad Iskandar Hamzah, Nurhazirah Hashim, Faculty of Business Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

As a result of having 'cultural values that vary so significantly with those of Other cultures' the culture develops a terror-genocide construct of Other-What happens, what always will happen?

"Children’s voices are heard “Defend Islam don’t be an infidel”"

" Hundreds of other men watched, holding their phones aloft to try to get a glimpse of the violence, but never making a move to intervene. Those standing by included several police officers.

..then the enraged men below her picked up poles and planks of wood, and hit at her until she lost her grip and tumbled down.

Her face bloodied, she struggled to stand. Holding her hands to her hair, she looked horrified to find that her attackers had yanked off her black hijab as she fell. The mob closed in, kicking and jumping on her slight frame….
Children’s voices are heard “Defend Islam don’t be an infidel”
Men deliberate “What to do with the body.
Overturned Verdict
“If it’s violence, who is responsible for this violence? The guy who started the episode and encouraged the people to hit her? The guy chanting slogans who encouraged the people? Was it a blow from a stick that killed her? A stone? Was it that she was burned, or was it the car running over her?””
Flawed Justice After a Mob Killed an Afghan Woman, New York Times, by Pulitzer Prize winner ALISSA J. RUBIN, DEC. 26, 2015

"Culture, of course, is related to violence in general and not only to structural violence. For example, culture influences the determination of "thresholds" which pressure on a person must overcome in order to move that person from being controllable, or even positive, to being negative (that is, into violence)."
The Culture of Violence, Chp 3. On the relationship between violence and culture - Galtung's concept

"It is very clear what I mean, which is that there is a violent, radical, fanatical, nihilistic interpretation of Islam by a faction … within the Muslim community that is our enemy, and that has to be defeated."  

"..meta-analysis summarizes 113 research reports worldwide (121 cross-sectional and 7 longitudinal studies) on age differences in ethnic, racial, or national prejudice among children and adolescents. Overall, results indicated a peak in prejudice in middle childhood (5–7 years) followed by a slight decrease until late childhood (8–10 years)."
Development of ethnic, racial, and national prejudice in childhood and adolescence: A multinational metaanalysis of age differences, T Raabe, A Beelmann - Child development, 2011

Dutch Intelligence Agency Warns of Child Jihadists, By Associated Press, February 16, 2017

"In the Qur’an, Allah is described as ‘merciful’ and ‘compassionate’. Why do we find no reflection of that among jihadis who claim to struggle in his name? Jihadis only possess a pseudo sense of empathy. They may appear to be empathic but it is a narcissistic empathy, for they are only empathic within their own group; it does not extend anywhere into their external world as evidenced by their murderous destructive behaviors.[1] Their stoic, dissociated affect shows neither compassion nor remorse as their fellow brethren engage in wanton beheadings and executions. In shame honor societies where children are humiliated and laughed at for having feelings and emotionality, it is no wonder that the capacity for empathy did not develop during their early years. Research by neuroscientists and mental health experts has shown strong links between violence and early childhood."
Nobody Born a Terrorist, but Early Childhood Matters: Explaining the Jihadis’ Lack of Empathy, by Nancy Hartevelt Kobrin, 2016

"Religions, especially, historically as well as currently, are recognized to be chronically implicated in this discord and violence, directed at those beyond their artificially defined boundaries of theological doctrine, and, as often, towards those claiming common religious identities but who have fragmented into sectarian factions and conflict (Mlodinow 2012, 164). Those of us with an eye towards history—or even towards current events—know that any simple congruence of religion and prosociality has never been the case."

"..children raised in religious households, who are perceived to be more empathetic and sensitive to justice, are in fact less altruistic to their own class mates .... children from religious households also differ in their ratings of deserved punishment for interpersonal harm (F(2, 847) = 5.80, p < 0.01, h2 = 0.014); this was qualified by significantly harsher ratings of punishment by children from Muslim households than children from non-religious households (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between children from Christian households and non-religious households.".
The Negative Association between Religiousness and Children’s Altruism across the World, November 05, 2015

"..the correlation between marginalization or lack of integration and radicalization are not as robust as is commonly assumed (see Rahimi and Graumans 2015)..
We are hearing and giving more credence to the revolutionary, as opposed to the nihilistic, nature of the claims being made. The revolution in question, moreover, is one which fuses the interests of the person and their personal story with the larger cause and movement. ..
At the core of this difference in interpretational orientation, and hence explanation for what is happening, is our more forthright approach to the intensely religious discourse of the foreign fighters, and the ways they use religious ideas to comprehensively frame their experiences."
Talking to Foreign Fighters: Socio-Economic Push versus Existential Pull Factors, Lorne L. Dawson, Amarnath Amarasingam, and Alexandra Bain, July 2016

"POLICE swooped and arrested a doctor’s teenage son in Melbourne before bombs were found at his Greenvale home, foiling an “imminent terror plot”."

A friend of the arrested teen’s family said they were respectable, and did not believe he could have done wrong.

“(He has) no bad preacher. He is a very quiet boy. He cannot drive. His father is a doctor and cannot allow him to do anything wrong,” the friend said.

“He has to look after his son properly."

"Behaviour of man arrested in Melbourne counter-terrorism raids improved after attending Islamic centre, father says.

Haidar attended the Al Furqan Islamic study centre and Harun Causevic started going there in July 2014.

Mr Causevic said the changes in his son were all positive.

“Before he started to pray, Harun was in the house aggressive, he broke [things], like a child. But after when he started to pray he really changed behaviour, 100 per cent,” he said.

“Now he was very good, always. Never, never yells, never, never do bad in house."
Father of suspect in counter-terrorism raid speaks EMMA YOUNGER The NewDaily Apr 19, 2015

"The outgoing governor of Jakarta has been sentenced to two years in prison for blasphemy and inciting violence.

Basuki Tjahaja Purnama, known as Ahok, was the first ethnic Chinese Christian to run Indonesia's capital, and the case was seen as a test of the country's religious tolerance.

He was accused of insulting Islam by referring to a verse in the Koran during a campaign speech."

"Jakarta. As the panel of five judges delivered the verdict condemning Jakarta Governor Basuki "Ahok" Tjahaja Purnama to two years in prison for blasphemy on Tuesday (09/05), they cited firebrand Islamist Rizieq Shihab as a Koranic authority.

Imprisoned twice for inciting violence, the leader of the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) had until recently occupied the fringe of Indonesian society; his followers are regarded as thuggish vigilantes with a penchant for extremism and extortion.

His recognition by the court as a venerable Islamic theologian — and the court's verdict itself — highlights the rising influence of Islamist groups in Indonesia, the world's largest Muslim-majority country but one with a multi-religious constitution and a tradition of tolerance."

1,000 people vs 100,000 Muslims Tell me once again how it is only the 'few' extremist Muslims=terror against and political/social subjugation of Other

Statistics clearly proves, with the burning buildings broken bodies and lives along with the political/social subjugation of Other there is a pathology inherently associated with the Islamic-Muslim ideology which determines the 'moderate' peaceful and law abiding Muslim families, communities and institutions culpable for continuing to supply straight from their floors the 'few' altruistic aligners/punishers to utilise an Islamic/Muslim codex defined method of analogised terror-genocide against Other, and inevitably with such constructs of hate, terror against their own to keep fellow adherents aligned to the normative Islamic/Muslim moral-ethical-belief cluster constructs.

"Footscray Park (Australia), at the back of Flemington Racecourse on 17 July 2015...

“I just heard music and chanting ... Koranic verses that were against Westerners.”

Mr Hewitt said the verses were about “unbelievers” or kaffir, and that they broadly said “if you don’t follow Allah ... you shouldn’t be alive.”

He said the verses also made reference to defeating the Westerners.

They are currently facing a committal hearing in the Melbourne Magistrates Court, charged with making preparations for incursions into foreign countries to engage in hostile activities."
‘Tinny terror’ court hearing gets underway in Melbourne, The Australian, PIA AKERMAN, May 15, 2017

"The Budget reveals ASIO’s work was set “against a steadily worsening overall security and operational environment”, notably from extremists with Australian passports looking to return home to the country and those that never left but were inspired by events overseas to carry out attacks."
Budget 2017: ASIO can no longer guarantee safety from ‘generation of extremists’ Charles Miranda, News Corp Australia Network, May 9, 2017

Sending more citizens to their deaths, grief and mental anguish born of such an insane policy of pretending the Islamic/Muslim culture is not the very source of the evil which confronts our soldiers overseas, citizens at home, and sending more citizens will in anyway resolve the cultural war being played out right across the globe, when the very Muslim combatants in the war zones outside our borders and inside them come directly from so called Muslim 'moderate' peaceful and law abiding families, communities and institutions, who exist even in our own Australian-French-US-British-Belgian-German-.... neighborhoods, has to be determined as a gross betrayal and in the end such actions perpetrated by policy makers against their own citizens must not be forgotten nor excused, if we are to prevent such dangerous idiocy recurring so easily in the future.

“But there is another side to the ISIS menace, hidden in the most familiar of places: American cities and suburbs, where recruits live among unsuspecting relatives and neighbors, communicating with the terror group through social media.

...American law enforcement officials estimate that roughly 250 Americans have tried to join IS. Most of them never left the United States, raising fears of more homegrown attacks like the one in December in San Bernardino, California. ” The Americans: 15 Who Left the United States to Join ISIS, by RICHARD ENGEL, BEN PLESSER, TRACY CONNOR and JON SCHUPPE

"unsuspecting" possibly for some, for who sees in their own cultural imbued prejudice the seeds of terror-genocide - rather than justified and authorised response to Others existence, yet Muslim culpability remains as the justification and authority for such actions of terror-genocide can be clearly identified in the Islamic/Muslim codex (text and exemplar (messianic) template) and in the symbols-words and actions carried out by those the Muslim 'moderate' peaceful and law abiding create and sustain.

“We .. see families not simply as behavioural systems, but as social structures organised around deeply tacit, and in part culturally rooted beliefs about the nature of language and the social world – beliefs that are themselves maintained in significant measure through patterns of familial communication (Applegate and Delia, 1980; Bernstein, 1974; Gecas, 1979; Grotevant, 1989; Lepper, 1983; Levine, 1989)
Most significantly, families (and parents within them) play a large role in imparting a logic – parallel to an economic theory, if you will – of how the social system works: of what social knowledge the child needs to acquire and how social knowledge, once acquired, can and should be used.”
Parental belief systems: The psychological consequences for children, (Sigel, McGillicuddy-DeLisi, & Goodnow, 2014)

"A large body of research implicates families in the development and prevention of aggressive and violent behavior."
Family Influences on Aggression and Violence, Aggression and Violence: A Social Psychological Perspective, Labella, Madelyn H, Masten, Ann S, 2016

'uncontroversial'. No more citizen-soldiers sacrificed to a lie.

Only Strategy which is guaranteed to be successful in Afghanistan or anywhere the Islamic/Muslim culture exists -Change the Architect and Builder or Change Nothing.

Yes it will take time but otherwise all Western cultures are doing are Damascus fortressing their communities, pouring the bodies of their citizens and their wealth into a limitless Muslim cultural propensity to deliver terror not only against Other cultures but also their own. It’s the culture stupid doing what cultures do Dissimulating, Adapting, Discovering, Improvising, and Overcoming.

Trump’s ‘skepticism’ is justified.

The following is indicative of a member of a culture creating terrorists as there is nothing wrong with the adherent’s codex creating the terrorists nor the development process the only tactic left is terror against terror -civil war or in the case of Islam internal bickering.

"There will be no dialogue with "extremists" in Libya, the country's eastern commander General Khalifa Haftar vowed in an exclusive interview with FRANCE 24 on Wednesday, saying that only "military solutions" could be used to defeat such groups."
“A nation, like man, is the creature of its past."
THE REVOLUTIONARY IDEA IN FRANCE, 1789-1871, By Lord Elton, 1923.

Cultures contain preset thresholds for shifting moral equilibrium and method of response which will not be halted by your perceived superior technology, firepower, communication and morality which has already been proven dangerous delusion held by many before you in exactly the same political/social space.

The death trap in Afghanistan for Other is believing you will gain anything by staying to see victory in any form, either believing you have excluded another power from a space you contend falsely is strategic or have prevented atrocities once unimaginable from being visited upon your own culture elsewhere, other than that which makes sense only under an Islamic/Muslim rationale system of terror-genocide and subjugation. You sacrifice lives and treasure only to increase the probability of your own demise sooner rather than later.

The strategy in Afghanistan are overwhelming strikes and immediate withdrawal and realise Pakistan is the key not Afghanistan.  Pakistan has inherited a violent fractious tribal frontier which must first be conquered before Afghanistan will be in anyway able to let go of its animosity related to Pakistan taking over space it determines as its own. Let Russia-China take on Afghanistan that will be the victory enough. 

Australian Historical view:
AFGHANISTAN: DANGEROUS NEUTRAL, Staff Sgt P. G. Gittins, Royal Australian engineers, Australian Army journal, January, 1960

“And who knows why with so much labour he builds  his house or how such things can give him pleasure? Like the dew on the morning glory are man and his house, who knows which will survive the other?” The Hojoki of Japan

The area now included within the state of Afghanistan, of which the mountain system of the Hindu Kush forms the backbone, lies across the land routes from the Middle East and South Central Asia into the attractively rich and fertile Indus Valley and the subcontinent of India. Historically, the recurring pattern of events over two thousand years at least was for the area of the Hindu Kush to be invaded from the west or the north, and then, generally after a brief pause, to be used as a base for the invasion of what is now Pakistan and India. The Indus Valley, whether rated by needy tribesman from the barren hills of Waziristan or threatened by heavy pressure from beyond the Hindu Kush, has generally been on the defensive.

For the possessors of the valley there has been no comparable prize to seek in the Hindu Kush or beyond: the mountains have simply been a rampart they needed to see in safe hands.

In these circumstances, and in the absence of any clearly defined “natural” frontiers, it was not until the eighteenth century that a sovereign state of Afghanistan emerged. Even then its existence was precarious until in the later part of the nineteenth century the diplomacy of Britain and Russia transformed it from a traditional springboard for southward invasion into a buffer state. Peace and opportunities for progress and internal development in Afghanistan have been assured only when as after 1880, and for most of the first part of the 20th century, the country has harboured no threat to its south-eastern neighbours.

The land and its peoples
The area of the kingdom of Afghanistan is approximately 250,000 mi², and its population in the region of 11,500,000. It consists basically of a high plateau traversed from east to west and south west by the formidable Western spurs of the Himalayan chain, the Hindu Kush range and its continuation, the Paropamisus mountains.

The country is in this way roughly divided into three main areas. The central, Eastern and South Eastern parts consist of high mountain spurs, the peaks of which decrease from over 20,000 feet in the east to 10,000 feet or less near Herat, an important population centre. Between these mountains lie fertile valleys. The north of Afghanistan is a fertile plateau continuous with the steps of Turkestan. Between the mountains of Afghanistan and those of its western neighbour, around, lies the third region: the deserts and semi deserts of Registan and Sistan. Through this area runs the river Helmand.

Over the high passes of the Hindu Kush and across the semi desert plateau of Western Afghanistan lie the routes by which caravans and armies have passed from the steppes and Central Asia to the fertile plains of the Indian subcontinent. Afghanistan has served, too, as the route linking Persia and Mesopotamia with both Central Asia and India.

Although traversed by trade routes, the physical obstacles of the terrain, the high mountains, deep valleys, and areas of barren desert have made difficult the establishment of a strong, closely knit state. The geographical disunity of the Afghanistan area has been paralleled by the racial diversity of the population. This diversity is a result of the constant ebb and flow of conquest and migration through the area, during which Greeks and Tartars, Scythians, Persians, and Sikhs have each for a time held all or part of the land. At present time the largest racial group of Afghanistan is that of the Pathans (Pashtun) or true Afghans, apparently of Turko–Iranian origin with some Indian admixture, who inhabit the central areas of the country. The Intro-Iranian language, Pushtu (or Pashtu), which they and several other tribes speak, has recently been made an official language alongside the more developed Persian. A second racial group is formed by the various tribes of Turkish origin, the Ghilzais, and the tribes inhibiting the northern steppe, such as the Uzbegs, the Turkmens and the Sards. The Tajiks, who inhabit the mountainous areas north and east of Kabul, the capital, are Persian speaking and of Persian racial origin, as are the settled population of Herat province and Sistan. Probable descendants of the conquering armies of long ago are the Mongoloid Hazaras from the area east of Kabul and the fair skinned Kaffirs of Noristan, who claimed to have come in remote times from the far west.

Production and Trade
Although cultivation is found only in the valleys and fertile plains, good crops of fruit, cereals and vegetables are raised. The asafoetida and castor oil plants are found in all parts, and good tobacco is grown in some areas. Sheep raising is an important industry, both wool and skins (especially Persian lamb skins) being exported. Cotton, too, is grown for export.

Coal, chrome and salt mind, but the considerable mineral wealth has still to be fully developed. Hydroelectric power is aiding the development of some industry and manufacturers. Since nineteen forty-nine, irrigation has been developed in the provinces of Kandahar and Herat.

The principal imports include machinery, textiles, rubber, tea and petrol. Much of Afghanistan’s trade is conducted with the Soviet Union. Kabul, the capital (population about 80,000) has factories for the production of matches, leather, boots, furniture, etc. Kandahar has also some industries, mainly weaving and carpet making.

Brief Historical Notes
For upwards of two thousand years the history of Afghanistan was that, not of a nation, but of a geographical area. A more or less regular cycle of events appears. Periodically conquerors appeared from over the Oxus and establish themselves on the northern slopes of the Hindu Kush. After a pause they passed through the mountains or outflanked their Western spurs until they reach the passes into India. After a short while they went on to the conquest of northern India. Then a split came between those who ruled in the warm plains of India and those who remained in the cold uplands and steppes of Afghanistan. Occasionally, when the peoples of Persia or India came under a strong leadership they asserted their sway up to and even into the mountains of the Hindu Kush.

Alexander the Great, marching from Persia to India in 329 BC, wintered near Kabul and founded the nucleus of a Greek empire which left its traces in the culture of the area and particularly in the self-governing walled villages of Bactria. In Bactria lay Balkh, in the heart of the great and civilised Kushan Empire (120 BC to 350 AD) under which Buddhism was brought to Afghanistan.

This Helleno–Buddhist civilisation was swept away in the 7th and 8th centuries by the proselytising armies of Islam. The religious conversion was thorough; today Afghanistan is a stronghold of Islam of the Sunni persuasion except for the Shia Hazaras. In their turn the Arabs were succeeded by the Mongols. In 1220 – 23 Genghis Khan laid waste Balkh, Herat, Kabul and Ghazni.

The rule of this Mongol dynasty lasted only a century and half. It yielded placed to the Turko- mongol dynasty is founded by Timur-i-Lang (Tamerlane) and Babur, of whose vast empires the Afghanistan area formed an outlying province.

It was from here that Babur descended to found the Mogul empire in the Indian subcontinent. Kabul and Kandahar remain for a time only provinces of Babur’s empire.

For a little over two hundred years (from 1526 until 1747) the land of the Afghans had been successfully a congeries of petty states, and centre of great empires ruled by foreigners, and a dismembered country, furnishing provinces to three monarchs. In 1737 Nadir Shah, one of Persia’s greatest monarchs, recovered Kandahar and conquered the Indian province of Kabul, but can ciliated the Afghans and enlisted many in his army – among them Ahmad Khan, a young chieftain of the Sadozai family of the Abdali tribe. Ahmad Khan rose to high rank in the Persian army, and after the assassination of Nadir Shah in 1747 was chosen by the Afghan chiefs at Kandahar as their leader and assumed the royal title. Afghanistan now became, for the first time, a distinct political entity, ruled by an independent native sovereign.

From 1747 until 1921, Afghanistan was the scene of numerous uprisings, assassinations, wars, and intrigue of every possible kind. Development was naturally retarded. Its geographical location made its friendship important to Britain, India, and Russia. It was – and still is – of great strategic importance.

The development of Afghan foreign relations
In 1919, Amanullah, a leader of the young progressive nationalists (the third son of the assassinated king Habinullah), was concerned to establish relations with other states and with Afghan participation in international affairs. The earliest diplomatic approaches were to Afghanistan is nearer neighbours, the USSR, Iran and Turkey.

The factors which conduce to the Anglo – Russian agreement of 1907 (that of border limitations) were, of course, no longer effective after 1917-18, and the Soviet government subsequently showed no hesitation in taking every opportunity to increase its influence in Afghanistan. On 28 February 1 921 a Russo – Afghan treaty was signed at Moscow which provided for formal diplomatic relations between the two states, the mutual recognition of Khivan and Bokhari independence. (Both being absorbed within the USSR in 1924 as parts of the “Republic” of Uzbekistan and the “Republic” of Turkestan) and for a number of conciliatory Soviet gestures towards Afghanistan. The Soviet government continued to strengthen its relations with Kabul by various methods, including offers of the services of Russian technicians (e.g., in the Afghan Air Force) and of technical facilities such as the training of Afghan pilots at Tashkent. Negotiations were also conducted between the two states in 1927 for the creation of the Kabul -ashkent air service and for a trade pact. In 1926 the provisions of the 1921 Russo-Afghan treaty were amplified but not superseded by a “pact of neutrality and nonaggression” concluded between the two governments on 31st August. A new treaty of “neutrality and nonaggression” was concluded on 24 June 1931.

In February 1921, Afghanistan signed a treaty of alliance with Turkey, and in June a treaty of “friendship and good relations” with Iran. Afghanistan also entered into treaty relations with a large number of other states both before and during the period 1927 – 28, when King Amanullah made a tour of many Asian and European countries, including a state visit to London. At about the same time Afghanistan became a party to a number of important international agreements, including the Red Cross Convention on sick and wounded combatants (1906), the universal Postal Union (1924) and the Kellogg pact (1928). In September 1934 Afghanistan was accepted as a member of the League of Nations.

Radical Reforms in the Overthrow of Amanullah
the innovations introduced by King Amanullah within Afghanistan were of a revolutionary character. Large-scale schemes for the building of trunk roads and for the creation of new capital city was started. Critics have held that they took insufficient account of the small size of the national income, and that at the same time practical needs such as the maintenance of law and order and the reform of taxation were neglected. More serious was the promulgation in 1923 of a new administrative code which was held to violate the cannons of Islam, and dislocated the already weak administration, and in 1924 of a decree introducing some measures of female education and emancipation. The outcome was the Khost rebellion of 1924 – 25, and although victorious, Amanullah had to yield to the Afghan Great Council (Loe Jirga), which recommended the abolition or amendment of a number of the most hated reforms.

The royal tour encouraged Amanullah to make further attempts to introduce Western ideas. In 1928 he placed before the Loe Jirga the outline of his proposed reforms: institution of a constitutional monarchy, Parliamentary government, Western dress, compulsory education for children, financial and currency reforms, and the suppression of the influence of the mullahs (preachers).

Opposition was universal, a rebellion broke out, and he fled to India.

Another king, Nadir, was elected, Law & Order was restored, and although Nadir’s reign was cut short after four years by assassination, his son was able to give the country a stable administration, sound finances, and a strong guiding hand to the cabinet of ministers.

Developments 1929 to 1957
since 1930, Afghanistan has been governed by a cabinet of ministers in which the royal family is strongly represented, assisted by an advisory council. The traditional Great Council (Loe Jirga), whose members are elected for life, meets only in exceptional circumstances. In local matters, however, many of the tribes exercise a measure of autonomy through the tribal councils. The system of law administered by the courts is the Hanafi code of Islamic law.

The Afghan government began in 1935 to put slowly into execution the policy of development laid down by Nadir Shah. The implementation of this policy has, of necessity, been slow, and on occasion unpopular. By nineteen thirty-nine hydroelectric installations had been built, textile mills and machinery for processing of cotton and sugarbeet erected, the northern coalfields partially developed, irrigation systems implemented, the construction of hospitals and the foundation of a medical faculty commenced, and the improvement of air and road communications. There are no railroads in Afghanistan.

In the period immediately after the Second World War shortages both of technical experts and of foreign exchange resources, resulting in great part from reduced exports of karakul lamb pelts, seriously affected the economic development of Afghanistan. An appeal was therefore addressed to the UN which resulted in a small preparatory mission going to Afghanistan in March – April 1950. This mission reported that since the government had already framed projects covering many fields of economic development, the main requirement was technical assistance at the operational level.

Since then the relevant specialised agencies of the UN (FAO, UNESCO, WHO, ILO, etc) have been giving technical assistance to Afghanistan in a number of fields. The most important of these have been the investigation of probable oil resources in the northern province, the establishment of improved air, road and radio communications, improved animal husbandry, disease and pest control, technical education and all aspects of health problems.

The USA is providing technical assistance in irrigation and drainage problems, soil, crop and related problems in the Helmand Valley, loans totalling 50,000,000 dollars, and assistance in the development of communications.

Foreign relations 1930 – 1957
It was under Turkish auspices that Afghanistan had become a member of the league of Nations. Relations between the two states became increasingly cordial, and Afghanistan turned to Turkey to help in such matters as the provision of military instructors and medical professors. In 1937 both states, together with Iraq and Iran, signed the Sa’adabad Pact of nonaggression.

Despite contact with Germany in the 1935 – 39., Afghanistan proclaimed and maintained its neutrality during World War II. In 1946 Afghanistan became a member of the UN, as well as a member of its specialised agencies.

Afghanistan’s principal external concern has nevertheless been relations with her southern and northern neighbours. Thus when it became clear during the Second World War that major constitutional changes were impending in the Indian subcontinent, Afghanistan was vitally interested. Its principal trade route lay through the port of Karachi, there were close linguistic and religious ties between the tribes on both sides of the Durand Line, and there was a considerable migration across the frontier. Furthermore, the Afghan government were concerned at the possible support to rebellious elements among the tribes of East Afghanistan which might come from the tribes east of the Durand Line if at any time they were not under firm control.

The partition of the Indian subcontinent did not change the status of the tribal areas. The then UK Secretary of State for Commonwealth relations (Mr. Noel Baker) said that with regard to the territories on the former NW frontier of India, it was the UK government’s view that “Pakistan is in international law the inheritor of the rights and duties of the old government of India… And that the Durand Line is the international frontier.” A plebiscite taken was in favour of Pakistan by 289,244 votes to 2,874. A series of tribal jirgas all meetings were held in the un-administered areas by the provincial governor during October 1947, and the tribes transferred to Pakistan their relationship to and obligations towards the governments of the UK and India, while Pakistan undertook to extend protection to them and to continue the allowances paid by the former government of India.

This settlement was unwelcome to the Afghan government, and since nineteen forty-seven a severe strain has been placed on the relations with Pakistan as a result of their officially conducted agitation in favour of the creation of a “Pathanistan” state (also called “Pusthunistan”). The essence of this claim is that the Pushtu speaking tribes in NW Pakistan, but not apparently those on the Afghan side of the frontier, should be given the opportunity to “opt out” and set up an autonomous state. The Soviet leaders express sympathy with Afghan policy on this issue during their visit to Kabul in 1955.

Afghan relations with Pakistan further deteriorated in 1955 following an incident in Kabul at the end of March, when a mob sacked and looted the Pakistan embassy and ambassadors residence and tore down and destroyed the Pakistani flag. This episode was not settled until the following September.

In November 1956 the Afghan Prime Minister visited Karachi (following a visit to Kabul in August by the Pakistan President), and it was stated afterwards that conversations had taken place in then “atmosphere of warmth and cordiality.” No advance appears to have been made, however, in the Pathanistan question.

Afghanistan – Russian relations
In relations between Afghanistan and her northern neighbour, the USSR, there have been important developments in recent years. There is little racial, religious or geographical distinction to be found between the dwellers on the north and south banks of the river Oxus, which constitutes much of the Russo – Afghan frontier. But it is an important factor that whereas the Afghan – Pakistani frontier region is rugged and economically a liability rather than an asset, the northern Afghan provinces of Maimana, Mazar–y–Sharif and Kataghan other source of much of Afghanistan’s wealth deriving from raising of karakul lambs, the growing of cotton, and the working of mineral deposits such as coal and sulphur. The Afghan government have in addition based considerable hopes for the development of the country on the exploitation of the oil resources believed to exist in these areas.

Arrangements had been completed in 1952 for an oil survey (including test drilling) by Western technicians working under the UN technical assistance administration. In August of that year, the Soviet Charge d’Affairs in Kabul informed the Afghan government that the employment of Western technicians on this work in northern Afghanistan would be regarded as an unfriendly act. In reply, although denying Soviet government’s right to interfere in Afghan internal affairs, the project was shelved.

On the other hand, there has been considerable development towards closer Russia – Afghan ties. A four-year commercial agreement was made in July 1950, and a Soviet trade agency is operating in Kabul. Since 1953, Afghanistan has accepted numerous Russian office of technical assistance. According to a Soviet broadcast on 7th September 1954, the current year had marked the beginning of a new stage in the development of Soviet technical aid to Afghanistan. Credit had been granted by the USSR for the building of grain silos and mills, for the construction of oil storage tanks, and for additional development of road, air and radio communications. In 1954, a Soviet cultural mission visited Kabul.

Mr Bulganin and Mr Khrushchev visited the country in December 1955, and in joint statements issued later it was announced that the 1931 Afghan-Soviet treaty of neutrality and nonaggression would be extended for ten years. It had been decided to “expand the friendly political, economic and cultural contacts” between the two countries. Representatives would meet to consider cooperation in developing agriculture, hydroelectric stations, irrigation systems, motor vehicle repair shops, and the reconstruction of the Kabul airport. The USSR agreed in principle to extend a long-term loan of 100,000,000 dollars for the development of Afghan economy, providing an agreement was signed at the end of January 1957.

American – Russian rivalry in Afghanistan
four years ago, the Russians moved into Afghanistan and set out to show their beneficence. The Americans had been in the country since the end of World War II: the Russians suddenly decided that anything the Americans could do they could do better.

The Afghans wanted sealed roads in Kabul, which for six months in the year was a bog heap, and for the next six months a dustbowl. They asked the Americans to build the roads, and the Americans had replied, correctly enough, that it was much better to reclaim the desert. The Russians built the roads – very good ones to – and put Russian buses and taxis on them. The Americans got Pan American Airways to bolster up the Afghan airline. The very day the contract was announced, the Russians revealed that they were building a very fine new airport at Kabul. The Americans made a fine colour film of Afghanistan – the Russians made an even better one. The Afghans wanted more bread, and the Americans tried to provide it with an irrigation project. The Russians built a bakery in Kabul and silos to store the wheat. The Americans complained that the Russians spread was full of stones, and that the streets melted in summer, but the Afghans like the bread and drove happily on the streets. Highly valued Persian lamb skins, once earning dollars, now began to earn roubles. Faithfully the Afghans kept the Russians out of their schools. They were determined there would be no communist subversion of the country. But when MIG fighters and helicopters arrived from the USSR for the Afghan Air Force, it was essential that cadets should receive their training in the Soviet Union.

A sort of Russian Colombo plan took technical students off to Soviet schools. None have gone to American schools. Afghanistan’s history of its relations with its neighbours has been a pretty sorry one. Today, many in Kabul feel that in the Soviet Union they have found a real friend.

Military developments in Afghanistan
The organisation of the army was based on a scheme formulated in 1917 for an establishment of six corps with HQ at Kabul (two corps), Jalabad, Matun, Herat, and Mazar–y–Sharif. Additional corps or divisions are now located at Kandahar, Ghazni, Urgun, Khanabad, and Gardez. Recruitment is on a voluntary basis and with some elements of compulsion, such quotas are allotted to areas. The total strength of the army in 1939 was about 60,000. This was raised during the World War II period, chiefly by the recall of discharged men, and it is probable that in the event of war numbers could be raised to 100,000 with 300,000 to 400,000 armed levees.

The forces are armed with modern weapons, including tanks. Military schools, once under Turkish supervision, are now staffed to some extent by Russian “advisers and technicians.” A certain amount of motor transport was purchased at the end of World War II, and this has been supplemented by Russian trucks. Thus the army’s mobility has been increased, and a reorganisation is in progress with the object of providing a central reserve at headquarters from which a mobile striking force could be furnished to support provincial troops.

In the country’s northern province, Soviet aid is transforming potholed Afghan roads into paved superhighways, including one that runs from the Russian rail heads and ports on the Oxus River, 390 miles south Kabul. US aid includes construction of some 500 miles of road from Kabul South and East to the Pakistan border. Although it was not intended that way, the roads will provide the Russians with a perfect network of all-weather roads running from the Oxus to the Khyber pass, the traditional invasion route into India from the north. A primitive country is not only being developed, it is being made strategically useful.

The presence of Russian troops in Afghanistan has been reported since 1954, but apparently little notice taken of it. However, reports from May, 1959, indicate that the Soviet has increased the number of troops there, and this is because the certain amount of tension and nervousness around Meshed, capital of Persia’s Khorasan province. From Afghanistan Russian troops could move forward to divide Persia from Pakistan, her neighbour in the Baghdad Pact. Troops and forward dumps of military equipment have been located at Herat, which straddles the main approach to Persia.

In Britain, the present Red Army penetration recalls fears of the Russians southward drive through Afghanistan, which haunted Queen Victoria’s Viceroy in India, Lord Curzon on, nearly a century ago.

A small Air Force is in existence once again supplemented by Russian “advisers and technicians,” MIG fighter planes, and Ilyushin jet bombers. More significant, a network of air feels has been constructed in northern Afghanistan, greatly reducing bomb arranged to Tehran, capital of anti-Communist Iran, and Karachi, capital of anti-Communist Pakistan. Scarcely 40 miles from the capital, lies the huge new Pagram airfield, with runways long enough to take Russia’s biggest jets.

The inaugurator and chief manipulator of the Afghanistan’s “profitable” neutrality is tough Prime Minister Mohammed Daoud. He took over the premiership some six years ago, and deals with everything from high policy to trivial administrative details. He claims his objective is to improve the lot of his people to the point where they can choose the kind of government they wish.

Mohammed Daoud’s avowed excuse for his close relations with the Soviet Union is that he needs support in his running quarrel with his neighbour Pakistan over “Pusthunistan” in point of fact, his “reckless neutrality” clearly rests on his belief that by cashing in on Cold War rivalries he can push Afghanistan’s development at a rate the country could never afford by itself. To the occasional warnings he is given by his ministers he replies, with all the confidence of a high wire performer, “I will personally guarantee that everything will come out all right.”

For a hundred years the British Raj preserved Afghanistan as a buffer state between Russia and India. Then the British Empire folded. Afghanistan, a victim of the vacuum thus created, has now passed the Communist point of no return.

Survey of International affairs, 1925, volume 1, the Islamic world, since the peace settlement by Arnold J Toynbee, (xiv) India, Afghanistan, and the frontier tribes.p546-569

“In 1825 a religious adventurer from Bareilly made his appearance on the Yusafzai frontier with about forty Hindustani followers, and gave out that he was a man of superior sanctity, and had a divine command to wage a war of extermination, with the aid of all true believers, against the infidel. After studying Arabic at Delhi, he proceeded to Mecca by way of Calcutta, and during this journey his doctrines had obtained so great an ascendancy over the minds of the Mohammedans of Bengal that they have ever since supplied the colony which Syad Ahmed Shah founded in Yusafzai with money and recruits. The Syad was eventually slain fighting against the Sikhs, but his followers establish themselves at Sitana, in the neighbourhood of that place they continue to flourish, notwithstanding that we have destroyed their settlements more than once during the last forty years.”
Forty years in India, Field Marshal Lord Roberts, 1901, p 281

“Dr. R.C. Majumdar says though Hindus had joined it, it was not a nationalist movement free from communal feelings nor was it founded on achieving equal rights for the two communities. The rebels were driven by the goal of replacing British rule with Muslim rule. Yet, it must be said that the Wahabi Movement was nurtured by both poor Hindus and Muslims since both had a common enemy in the zamindar; it shook the foundation of the British government.”
Wahabi Movement, March 26, 2014 by Amit Agarwal.

“Throughout the day my friend (!) The Amir, surrounded by his Sirdars, remained seated on a knoll in the centre of the camp watching the progress of the fight with intense eagerness, and questioning everyone who appeared as to his interpretation of what he had observed. So soon as I felt absolutely assured of our victory, I sent an Aide-de–camp to his highness to convey the joyful intelligence of our success. It was, without doubt, a trying moment for him, and a terrible disappointment after the plans which I subsequently ascertained he and his adherents at Kabul had carefully laid for our annihilation. But he received the news with Asiatic calmness, and without the smallest sign of mortification, merely requesting my Aide-de–camp to assure me that, as my enemies were his enemies, he rejoiced at my victory.” P407

"So far our success had been complete: all opposition had been overcome, Kabul was at our mercy, the Amir was in my camp ready to agree to whatever I might propose, and it had been all done with extraordinarily little loss to ourselves. Nevertheless, I felt my difficulties were very far from being at an end – indeed, the part of my duty still remaining to be accomplished was surrounded with far greater difficulty, and was a source of much more unsightly to me than the military task I had undertaken; for, with regard to the latter, I possessed confidence in myself and my ability to perform it, whereas, with respect to the political and diplomatic side of the question, actual personal experience I had none, and I could only hope that common sense and a sense of justice would carry me through." p411

"...A close investigation was to be instituted into all the causes and circumstances connected with the 'totally unprovoked and most barbarous attack by the Amir's soldiery and the people of his capital upon the representative of an allied state, who was residing under the Amir's protection in the Amir's fortress, in very close proximity to the Amir himself, and his personal safety and honourable treatment had been solemnly guaranteed by the ruler of Afghanistan. ." p411

"the next day I went to the Bala Hissar, and wandered over the scene of the Embassy's brave defence and cruel end. The walls of the residency, closely pitted with bullet holes, gave proof of the determined nature of the attack on the length of the resistance. The floors were covered with blood stains, and amidst the embers of a fire were found a heap of human bones. It may be imagined how British soldiers hearts burned within them at such a sight, and how difficult it was to suppress feelings of hatred and animosity Towards the perpetrators of such a dastardly the crime. I had a careful but unsuccessful search made for the bodies of our ill-fated friends" p412

"Yakub Khan certainly did not deserve much consideration from us; for, though no absolute proof with some forthcoming of his having instigated the attack upon the embassy, he most certainly made not the slightest effort to stop it or to save the lives of those in trust to his care, and throughout that terrible day showed himself to be, if not a deliberate traitor, a despicable coward. Again, his endeavours to delay the march of my force for the sole purpose of gaining sufficient time to organise the destruction of the army to whose protection he had appealed deprived him, to my mind, of the smallest claim to be treated as an honourable ally."p413-414

"Thus a period of doubt and expectation insured after the battle of Charasia; the Afghans were waiting on events, and the time had not arrived for a general movement.
This pause, however, was marked by certain occurrences which doubtless touch the national prior to the quick, and which were also susceptible of being used by enemies of the British government to excite into vivid fanaticism the religious sentiment, which has ever formed a prominent trait in the Afghan character.
The temper of the people being in this inflammable condition, it was clear that only disunion and jealousy amongst their chiefs prevented their combining against us, and that if any impetus could be given to their religious sentiment strong enough to unite the discordant elements in a common cause, a powerful movement would be initiated, having for its object our annihilation or expulsion from the country.

Such an impetus was supplied by the fervent preaching of the aged mullah Mushk-i-Alam, who denounced English in every mosque throughout the country. The people were further incited to rise by the appeals of the ladies of Yakub Khan's family to popular sympathy, and bribed to do so by the distribution of concealed treasure at their command.

The Mullahs, in short, became masters of the situation, and, having once succeeded in subordinating private quarrels to hatred of the common folk, the movement rapidly assume the aspect of a religious war. The Afghan success of 1841 – 42 were cited as examples of what might happen again, and the people were assured that, if they would only act simultaneously, the small British Army in Sherpur would be overwhelmed, and the plunder of our camp would be part of their reward.

"My intelligence was most effective; neither the nature of the country nor the attitude of the people admitted of extended reconnaissances, and I was almost entirely dependent for information on Afghan sources. Some of the Afghan soldiers in our ranks aided me to the best of their ability, but by the Sidars, notably Wali Mahomad Khan, I was, either wilfully or from ignorance, grossly misinformed as to the formidable character of the rising."p428-430

See p-338-341 Russian-British cultural competition Forty years in India, Field Marshal Lord Roberts, 1901

”.. The agent (Nawab Ata Mahomed Khan) arrived in Simla early in October. The Nawab gave it as his opinion that the emirs attitude of estrangement was due to an accumulation of grievances, the chief of which were – the unfavourable arbitration in the Sistan dispute; the want of success of Saiyead Nur Mahomed’s mission to India in 1873, when it was the desire of the Amir’s heart to enter into an offensive and defensive alliance with the British government; the interposition of Lord Northbrook’s government on behalf of Yakub Khan (the Amirs eldest son, who had rebelled on his younger brother, Abdulla Jan, being nominated air to the throne.); The recent proceedings in Khelat (before Lord Northbrook left India he sent Major Sandeman on a mission to Khelat to reopen the Bolan Pass, and endeavour to settle the differences between the Khan and the Baluchistan tribes, and between the tribes themselves who were all at loggerheads.), which the Amir thought were bringing us objectionably near Kandahar; the transmission of presence through Afghanistan, to his vassal, the Mir of Wakhan, without the emirs permission (presence given by the British government to the Mir of Wakhan in recognition of his hospitable reception of the members of the Forsyth Mission on their return from Yarkund.); And, above all, the conviction that our policy was exclusively directed to the furtherance of British interests without any thought for those of Afghanistan.

As regarded the proposed mission to Kabul, the invoice said that his highness objected to it for many reasons. Owing to local fanaticism, he could not ensure its safety, and it seemed probable that, though of a temporary nature to begin with, it might only be the thin end of the wedge, ending in the establishment of a permanent resident, as at the courts of the native rulers in India. Furthermore, the Amir conceived that, if he consented to this mission, the Russians would insist upon their right to send a similar one, and finally, he feared a British envoy might bring his influence to bear in favour of the release of his son, Yakub Khan, with whom his relations were as strange as ever.
In answer, the Viceroy enumerator the concessions he was prepared to make, and the conditions upon which alone he would consent to them; and this answer the agent was directed to communicate to the Amir.

The the concessions were as follows:
1. That the friends and enemies of either state should be those of the other.
2. That, in the event of unprovoked aggression upon Afghanistan from without, assistance should be afforded in men, money, and arms; and also that to strengthen the Amir against such aggression, the British government was willing to fortify Herat and other points on the frontier, and, if desired, to lend officers to discipline the army.
3. That Abdullah Jar should be recognised as the Amirs successor to the exclusion of any other aspirant; and that the question of material aid in support of such recognition should be discussed by the Plenipotentiaries.
4. That a yearly subsidy should be paid to the Amir on the following conditions:
That he should refrain from external aggression or provocation of his neighbours, and from entering into external relations without our knowledge.
That he should decline all communication with Russia, and refer her agents to us.
That British agents would reside at Herat and elsewhere on the frontier.
That a mixed commission of British and Afghan officers should determine and demarcate the Amirs frontier.
That arrangement should be made, by allowances or otherwise, for free circulation of trade on the principal trade routes.
That similar arrangements should be made for a line of Telegraph, the direction of which was to be subsequently determined.
That Afghanistan should be freely open to Englishmen, official and nonofficial, and arrangements made by the Amir, as far as practicable, for their safety, though his highness would not be absolutely held responsible for isolated incidents
The Viceroy concluded by suggesting that, if the Amir greed to these proposals, a treaty might be arranged between the agents of the respective governments, and ratified either at Peshawar, by the Amir meeting Lord Lytton there, or at Delhi if the Amir accepted his Excellency’s invitation to be present at the Imperial assemblage.

The Amir at the time vouchsafed no reply whatever to these proposals or to the invitation to come to Delhi. P329-331

“the Amir had eventually agreed to a discussion of Lord Lytton’s proposals being held, and for this purpose Saiyad Nur Mahomed and Sir Lewis Pelly had met at Peshawar in January, 1877. The meeting, unfortunately, ended in a rupture, owing to Sher Ali’s agent pronouncing the location of European offices in any part of Afghanistan and impossibility; and what at this crisis complicated matters to a most regrettable extent was the death of Saiyad Nur Mahomed, who had been in failing health for some time.

On learning the death of his most trusted Minister, and the failure of the negotiations, Sher Ali broke into a violent fit of passion, giving vent to his fury in threatenings and invective’s against the British government. He declared it was not possible to come to terms, and that there was nothing left to him but to fight; that he had seven crores of rupees, every one of which he would hurl at the heads of the English, and he ended by giving orders for a jahad (a religious war) to be proclaimed.
“Materials for the native soldiers huts were brought from the Bala Hissar, the demolition of which, as an active retributive justice, I had recommend to the government of India, as it appeared to me that the destruction of the fortified palace in which the massacre had taken place, and which was the symbol of the power of the Afghans and their boasted military strength, would be more fitting punishment for treachery and insult than any other we could inflict, and a more lasting memorial of our ability to avenge our countrymen than any we could raise. The tidings that their ancient citadel had been levelled to the ground would, I felt sure, spread throughout the length and breadth of Afghanistan, bearing with them a political significance that could hardly be overestimated.” P 419

“There had been a good harvest, and supplies were abundant; but the people from the outlying districts were chary of assisting us, for they knew from experience that all who befriended the British would be sure to suffer when we took our departure.
I had repeated complaints brought to me of the harshness and injustice with which those who had shown themselves well disposed towards us were treated by the emir on his return from signing the treaty at Gandamak, and most of the Afghans was so afraid of the Amir’s vengeance when they should again be left to his tender mercies, that they held aloof, except those who, like Wali Mahomed Khan and his following, were in open opposition to Yakub Khan, and some few who were still smarting from recent injury and oppression.” P 419

“I was frequently asked by the Afghans, when requiring some service to be rendered, ‘Are you going to remain?’ Could I have replied in the affirmative, or could I have said that we should continue to exercise sufficient control over the government of the country to prevent their being punished for helping us, they would have served us willingly. Not that I could flatter myself they all together like this, but they would have felt it wise in their own interests to meet our requirements; and, besides, the great mass of the people were heartily sick and tired of a long continuance of oppression and misrule, and were ready to submit (for a time, at least) to any strong and just government.

Lord Lytton, in the hope of saving from the resentment of the Amir those who had been of use to us in the early part of the war, had expressly stipulated in Article II. Of the Gandamak Treaty that ‘a full and complete amnesty should be published, absolving all Afghans from any responsibility on account of intercourse with the British forces during the campaign, and that the Amir should guarantee to protect all persons, of whatever degree, from punishment or molestation on that account. ‘

But this stipulation was not adhered to. Yakub Khan more than one spoke to me about it, and declared that it was impossible to control the turbulence spirits in Afghanistan without being supreme, and that this amnesty, had it been published, would have tied his hands with regards to those who had proved themselves his enemy.
His neglect to carry out this article of the treaty added considerably to my difficulty, as will be seen from the following letter from Asmatula Khan, a Ghilzai Chief, to whom I wrote, asking him to meet me at Kabul.
‘I received your kind letter on the 8th of Shawal (28th September), and understood its contents, and also those of the enclosed proclamation to the people of Kabul. I informed all whom I thought fit of the contents of the proclamation.

‘Some time ago I went to Gandamak to Major Cavagnari. He instructed me to obey the orders of the Amir, and made me over to his highness. When Major Cavagnari returned to India, the Amir’s officials confiscated my property, and gave the chief ship to my cousin (or enemy), Bakram Khan.

‘The oppression I suffered on your account is beyond description. They ruined and disgraced every friend an adherent of mind. On the return of Major Cavagnari to Kabul, I sent my Naib (deputy) to him, who informed him of my state. Major Cavagnari sent a message to me to the effect that I should recover my property by force if I could, otherwise I should go to the hills, and not come to Kabul until I heard from him. In the meantime I received news of the murder of the invoice, and I am still in the hills.‘ p420

”The thought of what might be in store for those who were now aiding me trouble me good deal. No doubt they help was not disinterested, but they were “s friends in need”, ‘and I could not be quite indifferent to their future.
I had several interesting conversations with Yakub Khan, and in discussing with him Sher Ali’s reasons for breaking with us, he dwelt on the fact that his father, although he did not get all he wished out of Lord Mayo, was fairly satisfied and content with what had been done for him, but when Saiyad Nur Mahomed returned from Simla in 1873, he became thoroughly disgusted, and at once made overtures to the Russians, with whom constant intercourse had since been kept up.

Yakub Khan’s statements were verified by the fact that we found Kabul much more Russian than English. The Afghan Sirdars and officers were arrayed in Russian pattern uniforms, Russian money was found in the Treasury, Russian wares was sold in the bazaars, and although the roads leading to central Asia it was certainly no better than those leading to India, Russia had taken more advantage of them then we had to carry on commercial dealings with Afghanistan.” p421

Restrictions determining ignominious defeat in Afghanistan:
Yes: Restrictions are in reality founded upon assumptions which if utilised particularly in development of National Security Policy will lead to increasing danger for the cultures utilising such false assumptions:

Restriction 1: Assumption Cultures 'good' are not responsible for the terrorists systemically walking from their floors and therefore the families, communities, institutions developing these altruistic enforcer/punishers are not to be held culpable, punished and stopped from developing more.

Restriction 2: Assumption the values-culture Western citizen soldiers are dying for are their own, and the enormous wealth expended will not enhance the Islamic/Muslim culture soldiers are told they are fighting to destroy, to destroy them and their own culture.

Restriction 3: Assumption the moral equilibrium of any Islamic/Muslim political/social entity will not significantly move as it has always done in the past as it is now in Turkey to wipe out-cleans any 'Western' view of civilised advancement to return the Islamic/Muslim ethic-belief moral equilibrium norm.

Restriction 4: Assumption You can come to an accomodation - political understanding of mutual benefit with a culture you determine as your ally and the one you determine as your enemy when both adhere to the same cultural codex determining your violent demise.

Restriction 5: Assumption (the most dangerous for the development of appropriate National Security Policy) A Islam Islamist dichotomy paradigm exists even though the Islamists are Muslims walking straight from the Muslim Islam codex (textual non-textual and exemplar (messianic) template and Muslim-Islam family, community and institutions development process which creates the Islamists-Muslims motivating prejudice and heightened aggression to deliver terror-genocide against fellow humanity.

Since WWII the West has been fighting other cultures civil wars utilising other cultures enforced no go areas (in a war this is stupidity personified for where does the enemy gain strength and launch their attack from) the West are therefore not fighting for their own values or culture and will and are suffering the consequences - as other cultures are fighting wars Islam/Muslims, Russia, China,..- ie moving into political/social/economic/geographic space and taking it for their own - piece by piece - this is what cultures actually do.

The restriction in fact illness restricting the West's capacity to achieve victory in any sphere is pathological altruism as other cultures Dissimulate, Adapt, Discover, Improvise and Overcome.


 Kilcullen, D 2010, Counterinsurgency, Oxford University Press.

Popular posts from this blog

Franz Kafka has been relegated to the ordinary. Islam Islamist Dichotomy Paradigm "the paradigms tells us what is real and how it works, to question the paradigm is to question the structure of the world itself"

Saudi crown prince promises 'return to moderate Islam'=Reich Minister of Propaganda of Nazi Germany promises 'return to moderate Nazism'. The Terror-Genocide Continues. A Muslim cultures dissimulating soft power in full swing despite the obvious contradiction.

A proof the Islam Islamist Dichotomy Paradigm, Islam/Not Islam-strain of extremism, Underwriting the legitimacy of National Security Policy is a dangerous lie-is it not time to be honest, Lakemba Muslims are as much a threat to humanity as Muslims have been everywhere else in time and space