No culture has a right to visit terror-genocide against another culture in the same space - be it perpetrated by the 'few' sourced from the 'many' or the 'few' in time as elsewhere becoming the 'many'.

No culture has a right to visit terror-genocide against another culture - be it perpetrated by the 'few' sourced from the 'many' or the 'few' in time as elsewhere becoming the 'many'.

"He said it was obvious Abdeslam was part of a bigger network."
Paris terror attacks: Fugitive likely getting help from others, says Belgium NOVEMBER 27, 2015

How quickly the 'few' turn into the 'many' when allowed the space to flourish. When will it become clear there can be no 'few' without the 'many' and the 'few' are of the 'many' as they always have been and have to be otherwise they would never exist.

We have to grow with the threat, and we have to do it in a confident manner,” Professor Siracusa said.
Two Sydney schools in lockdown as police unions call for support against extremists SBS 20 OCT 2015

"We (the Australian people) have to grow with the threat (Muslim cultural derived terror)"

This is the world our current political elite and their so called experts are promising us and our children's children the opportunity to grow with terror.

No culture has a right to demand nor the political elite and their so called experts who enable such a culture to flourish in our midst that the Australian citizen and their children and generations to come have to pay the price of terror in our streets, with the dead bodies as we have seen and the massive redirection of wasted resources simply to protect ourselves from another culture in our midst. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.

"A terror plot that involved the kidnapping and beheading of prison guards was also ­uncovered by jail intelligence and the growing group is threatening to murder jail ‘‘infidel’’ who will not convert."
Goulburn Jail (Australia) becomes an off-shoot of ISIS The Sunday Telegraph October 11, 2015 JAMES PHELPS

"The head imam at Lakemba, Sheikh Yahya Safi, had told the congregation during prayers that they should not take part in anything to do with Christmas.

The fatwa, which has sparked widespread community debate and condemnation, warns that the "disbelievers are trying to draw Muslims away from the straight path"

It also says that Christmas Day and associated celebrations are among the "falsehoods that a Muslim should avoid ... and therefore, a Muslim is neither allowed to celebrate the Christmas Day nor is he allowed to congratulate them

"The fatwa quotes the teacher Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim as saying that congratulating disbelievers for their rituals is forbidden, and if a "Muslim who says this does not become a disbeliever himself, he at least commits a sin as this is the same as congratulating him for his belief in the trinity, which is a greater sin and much more disliked by Almighty Allaah than congratulating him for drinking alcohol or killing a soul or committing fornication or adultery”.

No merriness here: mosque puts fatwa on Christmas Sydney Morning Herald, Natalie O'Brien, December 23, 2012

From "The head imam at Lakemba (Mosque Sydney Australia ) , Sheikh Yahya Safi", clearly not a 'marginalized' youth driving ethics of hate against Other from the highest level of the Islamic/Muslim cultural ethics-moral enforcer hierarchy 2012 to 2015 with two dead Other in our streets and the call by the 'few' altruistic enforcers youth and adult turning inexorably as they have in time and space elsewhere into the 'many' replicating the demand made generation after generation since the seventh century straight from the Islamic/Muslim codex construct of Other convert or suffer 'grievous harm' or 'severest penalty'.

The apology written in the Sydney sky that 2012 Christmas was and still is a mockery of the reality that it could be deemed such a statement was possible to be made at all in the Democratic multicultural space that was Australia then, clearly inevitable building of the Islamic/Muslim terror-genocide against Other internal and external to our once peaceful Australian streets was red flagged in 2012.

For Muslims to deny their codex justifies or authorises such a rejection and condemnation of Other to be analogised to inform such antipathy against Other deny what has occurred since the seventh century and continues to occur within the 21st century, the point is significant numbers of Muslims do believe and this is reflected as an underlying ethic which sits in a non-contradictory Islamic/Muslim framework which justifies not only terror-genocide against Other but informs punishment for those who dare to go against such cultural dictates.

All events related to Christmas and New Year celebrations are contrary to Islamic culture, which could damage the faith of the Muslim community," the director general of the religious affairs ministry told reporters Tuesday.

Sheikh Mohamed Khayrow said security forces had been ordered to break up any such celebrations. "There should be no activity at all," he said.

Sheikh Nur Barud Gurhan, of the Supreme Religious Council of Somalia, said that non-Muslim festivities might provoke the ire of Al-Shebab, East Africa's Al-Qaeda branch, which is headquartered in Somalia.

"We are warning against the celebration of such events which are not relevant to the principles of our religion," Gurhan added, saying it could provoke Al-Shebab "to carry out attacks".

Somalia bans Christmas and New Year festivities 
The Daily Star Lebanon Dec. 23, 2015

"“Today I place my faith in and am grateful to Allah the almighty to announce that tomorrow, Thursday, May 1 2014, will see the enforcement of Sharia law phase one, to be followed by the other phases,” the 68-year-old sultan said at the time.

Brunei’s Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah has declared a ban on public celebration of Christmas in the tiny oil-rich state, saying that residents face jail if caught celebrating the Christian festival. The punishment for celebrating Christmas publicly in Brunei is now a fine of $20,000, or up to five years in prison, or both." INQUISITR December 22, 2015

Sharia law dictates' cannot exist if they contradict the Quran constructs therefore the action to determine Christmas activities a crime is a Islamic/Muslim cultural normative ethic to claim otherwise is a lie to do so an adherent is not reflecting Islamic precepts but Others Western Liberal Democratic precepts.

"The group (Islamic Party of Australia Hizb-ut Tahrir), which reportedly described last week the slaying of the magazine staff by Parisian terrorists as a "cure".."
Hizb ut-Tahrir holding public meeting in Lakemba over Charlie Hebdo by Natalie O'Brien smh, January 18, 2015

"The sharia law comes after Aceh's government said several Christian churches would be shut down, just days after a mob burned down a church earlier this month, killing one person and injuring several others."
Indonesia's Aceh province enacts Islamic criminal code smh October 24, 2015

Do you notice ISIS are not responsible for the Muslim atrocities for at least two of the quotes above and so many more. So what are the atrocities in Western Streets caused by, and which cultural group in reality has created and sustained ISIS managers and perpetrators as well as the other Muslims informing the same behavior?

No connection whatsoever in the quotes above or the development of worse outcomes for Other to a set of religious beliefs and informed methodology, a clear delineation between the extremist 'few' and the non radicalised 'moderate' law-abiding Muslims - it is about time our dangerous cultural gatekeepers operating from a Western Liberal Democratic 'rational' model which bears no relationship to the Islamic/Muslim 'rational' model realise what policy initiatives you would expect to work under one simply will never work under the other.

The red flags - 
Firstly the ethic-moral environment had to exist in the Sydney Lakemba Islamic/Muslim culture to underwrite such a statement being made,

Secondly more importantly what the imam declared from the minbar (pulpit) in the mosque had to be a core Islamic/Muslim cultural codex precept which was justified and authorised and as such could be defended as a true reflection of the codex not an extremist view from an Islamic/Muslim cultural codex rational model,

"Banda Aceh: Indonesia's conservative Aceh province has enacted a strict Islamic criminal code, officials said late on Friday, criminalising adultery, homosexuality, and public displays of affection outside of a legally recognised relationship, with penalties that include public whippings with a thin rattan cane."
Indonesia's Aceh province enacts Islamic criminal code smh October 24, 2015

"A source is reported to have said: "This proposal has created a great division in Newham.

"That would get a lot worse if the thing was built."

Tablighi Jamaat, an ultra-conservative Islamic sect believes Muslims should not integrate into non-Muslim society, already has a temporary mosque for 2,500 worshippers on the site.

In 2013 the High Court ordered the sect to close the temporary mosque because it did not have planning permission, but is has so far refused to do so"
Islamic group blocked from building 'megamosque three times bigger than St Paul's Cathedral' in London The plans were originally rejected by Newham Council in 2012 by 
Samuel Osborne INDEPENDENT 26 Oct 2015

Note the dates above does this tell your view as to Other cultures able to be subject and cognisant of human rights development to this point makes any difference to the treatment of Other cultures by the Islamic/Muslim culture even Other cultures determined as 'of the Book' the only cultures which supposedly obtain qualified acceptance? Really given the construct of the same Other cultures elsewhere in the Islamic codex?

Thirdly such a construct of rejection of Other and the beliefs-ethics-morals driving methodology for dealing with Other was and continues to be integral to the justification and authorisation of terror-genocide against Other and,

"The sharia law comes after Aceh's government said several Christian churches would be shut down, just days after a mob burned down a church earlier this month, killing one person and injuring several others."
Indonesia's Aceh province enacts Islamic criminal code smh October 24, 2015

Fourthly any reflection on what the imam's statement meant for the future in Australian streets given history would have dead Other in our streets as such ethics-morals found to be significantly different in the Islamic/Muslim culture in time and space continue to develop around the actual Islamic/Muslim genocide construct of Other which remains in the twenty-first century the exact same cultural codex construct as in the seventh century - as reflected by the imams statement.

"The findings of the study indicate that citizens (Hofstede and Hofstede (2005)) of Islamic countries share similar cultural values that vary significantly with those of the Western countries."
Conceptualizing the Islamic Personality Model, Abdul Kadir Othman, Muhammad Iskandar Hamzah, Nurhazirah Hashim, Faculty of Business Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

The Islamic Party of Australia Hizb-ut Tahrir posted their draft Islamic Constitution of Australia 

1 – The articles of this constitution are characterised by the fact that they are exclusively and purely Islamic opinions and thoughts. They contain nothing whatsoever that is non Islamic, nor are they influenced by anything that is non-Islamic. They are rather Islamic in every sense and nothing else, and they are based upon nothing but the foundations and texts of Islam.
Draft Islamic Constitution of Australia

"The group (Islamic Party of Australia Hizb-ut Tahrir), which reportedly described last week the slaying of the magazine staff by Parisian terrorists as a "cure".."
Hizb ut-Tahrir holding public meeting in Lakemba over Charlie Hebdo January 18, 2015
by Natalie O'brien smh

Anyone who compares the Western Democratic constitutions and the ethics-morals-beliefs-motivation and methodology - the 'rational' systems of classifications and causality which drive the subsequent Western Democratic cultural behavioral variance and compares it to the Islamic/Muslim rational system surely must realise immediately these two diametrically opposed constructs cannot nor ever could as we have seen through history remain in the same space without in time informing major bloody schism.

It is astonishing the Western Democracies are allowing such political constructs to develop which are clearly fascism in religious clothing with the clear intent, even in writing before us to subjugate Other, this is no fantasy invented by the Nazi and confederates to accuse Jews of attempting political domination of Other, here it is in our very streets with the persons who have simply reflected textual constructs from already established political forms in our own time let alone historic, in fact the prescribed number one definitive source for the Islamic/Muslim cultural politic is the Qur’an and "the authority of the transmitted proof is not dependent upon whether it can be rationally justified or not." .

It is not a matter of an Islamic/Muslim culture in secret or otherwise working to a forty, one hundred year,... plan to subvert Western Culture, even if such a document existed in reality which I very much doubt, it would be written in ignorance of how cultures interact and the forces which enable or prevent the full reflection of a cultural codex into the societal-political space the culture exists in. Worse such an attempt to create such a document and/or believe it would represent actual proof of the Islamic/Muslim cultural intent regards Other cultures and must be taken seriously denies the very law of nature to which all entities from the smallest particle to the largest are subject uncertainty. 

Organisms inclusive of cultures are contiguous systems which have inherent functions- codex(DNA) informed actions -behaviors- which inform the nature of their proactive/reactive interaction with outside border organisms-Other cultures. Therefore there are never any plans only aspirations, desires, needs which are necessarily bounded by context within which the organism exists in other words survival-regeneration-within context.

This is a Theory not a Hypothesis: Cultures have no ‘Master Plan’ there never is but there is invariably a cultural codex stipulated principle ALL should convert to the True belief,

The Islamic Hizb ut-Tahrir political party in Australia is an example of a culture,enabled by not just the 'few' members for without the 'many' adhering to the exact same codex (DNA) Hizb ut-Tahrir could not exist, of a methodology being adapted to context, move the party to Achie Indonesia what would be included or excluded from the draft?

One sees the gradual elimination of Other via state control where a specific culture with a terror-genocide construct of Other dominates and is inevitably unleashed to commit genocide even against fellow citizens.

"With its regulations recognizing only five faiths (Islam, Protestantism, Catholicism, Hinduism, and Buddhism) as legitimate options for its citizens, the New Order effectively outlawed the indigenous religions practiced in local communities across eastern Indonesia, Kalimantan, and interior Sumatra. Anthropologists working in these areas in the 1970s and 1980s provided vivid accounts of the deleterious impact of these policies on indigenous religions, and, conversely, their role in catalyzing conversion to Christianity or Islam.73 State policies had a similar impact on abangan Islam. Over the past thirty years the institutions through which Javanist Islam once operated as a public alternative to orthodox Islam have declined, whereas institutions for Islamic education and devotion have grown (chapter 4).74 Upset by Muslim participation in the anticommunist massacres (how soon the Left forgets), 75 some 3 percent of ethnic Javanese converted to Hinduism or Christianity in the first years of the New Order.76 Others took shelter in mystical associations. Both developments pale, however, in comparison with the growing numbers of Javanists who have adopted a more pious profession of Islam.
What is apparent, however, is that democratic consolidation will require not just a civil society of independent associations (although these are important too) but a public culture of equality, justice, and universal citizenship. In this majority-Muslim society, and in the aftermath of a great Islamic revival, the creation of such a public culture of democratic civility will be impossible unless it can build on the solid ground of civil Islam. While affirming the legitimacy of religion in public life, civil Islam rejects the mirage of the "Islamic" state, recognizing that this formula for fusing religious and state authority ignores the lessons of Muslim history itself. Worse yet, without checks and balances in state and society, the "Islamic" state subordinates Muslim ideals to the dark intrigues of party bosses and religious thugs.

The Indonesian example reminds us, then, that while a civil society and civic culture are required to make democracy work, by themselves they are still not enough."
Civil Islam: Muslims and Democratization in Indonesia, Robert W. Hefner

The truth we have to face as Hizb ut-Tahrir draft reveals and actions on the ground in Indonesia not only in the Indonesian provence of Aceh and in Turkey as Democratic institutions and checks upon State power such as a 'free' judiciary and the press are being taken apart, 'civil Islam' only exists as a possibility from a Western Democratic 'rational' system perspective as there are no Islamic/Muslim core cultural codex which determines the Islamic/Muslim culture can be subject to a secular state which gives Other cultures equal power of even a secular state full stop. Aceh is an example being played out before us acquiescence to a 'secular' state that full sharia law will not be imposed Other cultures will not be oppressed then what happens?

'Civil Islam' is an impossibility under an Islamic /Muslim politic construct in fact it is an oxymoron and exists only in part because of Other cultural force holding it back internal/external to the extent they are currently able. In Indonesia as elsewhere as long as Islamic/Muslim cultural codex is allowed to dominate or even exist there will be this struggle for Other cultures to survive in peace. For such a cultural codex as the Islamic/Muslim codex cannot allow such diametrically opposed values to exist in the same space which is why the Islamic/Muslim culture developed the methodology of terror-genocide against Other cultures in the first place.

Anyone with two neurons in their head must realise after examining the Hizb ut-Tahrir Draft Islamic Constitution of Australia why the Western Democracies have terror developing in their streets and it will get worse - the article within the draft determining Other will be able to follow their beliefs in the constitution is simply a nonsense when reviewing the rest of the constitution and similar promises made across time, reminds me of another assurance of similar quality:

"The Jews are guilty! The Jews are guilty!" .. "We have nothing to contribute to it, it will come by itself, because it has to come." said Paul Joseph Goebbels Reich Minister of Propaganda in Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1945

The next sentence:

"actions will be carried out without pity without mercy" and the rest.

Auschwitz and the rest

... reminds me of another assurance of similar quality:

"002.256 Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error: whoever rejects evil and believes in God hath grasped the most trustworthy hand- hold, that never breaks. And God heareth and knoweth all things." Muhammad's Quran

The next sentence:

"Of those who reject faith the patrons are the evil ones .." and the rest.

"A growing ISIS gang within Australia's highest security prison has threatened to behead correctional officers and inmates who do not convert.."
ISIS gang threaten to behead officers and inmates at Goulburn jail Yahoo7 News October 11, 2015

and the rest.
And all who support such a political construct which can be clearly shown to be directly constructed from the Islamic/Muslim core cultural codex are law-abiding citizens one of the 'many' not one of the inevitable growing numbers of the 'few' created and sustained by the 'many' formed not because of US imperialism,Western colonialism, marginalisation, etc but because of the fact Other is simply not going to be subject to such Islamic/Muslim political constructs without the utilisation of prescribed in text and exemplar template behavior the methodology of generating rational fear and a lot of it. 

Why do you think Muhammad created this methodology of justified and authorised terror in the Quran in the first place, because Muhammad's convincing words and sentences alone were enough to convince Other they should change architect and builder? We are in a cultural war you idiots your Freedom of Religion and Multiculturalism paradigm as it stands currently is shite.

And then as always, not may be, when such significantly different cultural values exist in the same space ......

"A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure, permanently, half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved — I do not expect the house to fall — but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other. Either the opponents of slavery will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction; or its advocates will push it forward, till it shall become lawful in all the States, old as well as new — North as well as South." Lincoln 1835

This is a Theory not a Hypothesis: Cultures have no ‘Master Plan’ there never is but there is invariably a cultural codex stipulated principle ALL should convert to the True belief,

Knowing this what did you do you dumb dangerous gatekeepers? The answer lies broken and bloody in our streets with more to come from both directions if you continue to deny the Muslim law-abiding 'many' are not the source of the very terror-genocide Other are subject to. Lebanon nor the streets of Damascus of so many many examples hold no historical significance just another of Cruickshank's 'fantastic object-lesson' as you have turned us into now.

"So today we're all standing here in solidarity, Muslims and non-Muslims alike, together to form one voice against these racist, which don't belong in Australia."
Protesters gather at Parramatta Mosque week after worshipper shot dead police employee Curtis Cheng ABC 9 Oct 2015

"A masked swordsman who stabbed two people to death and wounded others was driven by racist motives, Swedish police said"
Masked man who killed two and wounded others at Swedish school was racially motivated, police say ABC 24 OCT 2015

Why is it one murder of a cultural defined Other is driven by a racism and the other is a cultural act of murder by a 'worshipper' and those objecting to the worshipper and the cultural codex which has clearly justified and authorised such behavior from the seventh century to right now as we even see in Aceh Indonesia, and in our very own Australian streets are the racists?

What rationally should not belong in Australia the Islamic/Muslim codex construct of Other which causes the response it clearly has since the seventh century or Other objecting to such an Islamic/Muslim codex construct of Other becoming manifest in their own streets and as Other can see elsewhere the notion of human rights to this point particularly regards women does not and has not convinced the Muslim 'many' that the true nature of their ethic-moral-beliefs-motivation and methodology in their cultural codex which determines both Other and women less and subject to be diminished and not analogised into reality?

The apology 2012 the statements from another minbar (pulpit) in a mosque 2015 'If you don't like Australia, leave' from whence terror felt safe-supported surrounded by the Islamic/Muslim ethical-moral cloak from the Mosques very floor to change into symbolic black the significance of which is understood even by Other to walk three hundred meters and gun down another innocent Other, but clearly not innocent from an Islamic/Muslim cultural rational model for the symbolic walk of death from the very ethical-moral codex floor supporting each step would not have been able psychologically to have commenced from this Parramatta Mosque, for the murder and the thousand upon thousands who suffer the same fate. Other is clearly not innocent from the perspective of the Islamic/Muslim cultural rational model,
 the terror-murders would never occur otherwise - what ethical-moral environment, justification and authorisation has to have existed and must still exist now in the Parramatta Islamic/Muslim environment?

The ethical-moral Islamic/Muslim cultural mean is shifting inexorably, as resources and political power increase, to the true ethical-moral-behavoral reflection of what is actually contained in the Islamic/Muslim codex, reflection of Others own ethical-moral rational model from the Islamic/Muslim culture is dissipating as it always has when provided with the means to do so. - read the Islamic/Muslim codex you fools. Social psychologists must understand all of this yet silence as the bloodied bodies mount and in time as elsewhere terror will rise to meet terror - the assumptions along with the paradigm driving current inter-cultural policy needs to change - this is clearly not criminal action - it is cultural informed action against Other - derived straight from the law-abiding ranks - unless we face this and turn the policy direction - what inevitably in the long term will you be responsible for?

Social psychologists also understand these altruistic enforcer 'few' can have a far greater affect upon a cultures ethic-moral-behavioral mean than their mere numbers signify as they clearly inform on the external space with not only broken bodies, diminished lives but also a vast redirection of scarce resources better used for enabling flourishing lives of citizens rather than protecting them from another culture in the same space, yet again silence when we hear our political elite proclaim "It is only the 'few', a small minority you cannot blame the whole of culture." - social psychologist know yes you can, for two reasons firstly these 'few' are templated straight from the whole of cultures core codex and secondly they appearing in the form fit for context - cultures simply do not create such adherents with specific ethic-moral-beliefs (intensity derived from the same codex of whole of culture) and informed methodology for no cultural purpose.

"• Parents do not have the confidence to argue against the articulate and forceful activists who seek to impose their views, for fear of being branded as disloyal to their faith or their community."
Schools face new curbs on extremism after Birmingham Trojan horse affair
Patrick Wintour, Political editor The Guardian, Wednesday 23 July 2014

It has to be accepted within the culture these 'few' will be rewarded based on the cultures 'rational' model, and importantly such behavior can be clearly justified and authorised by the cultural codex constructs to enable such behavior surviving internal opposition, enough of the law-abiding have to agree and acquiesce-accept something reluctantly but without protest, within culture to enable this to occur otherwise the number of the 'few' with their imbued cultural nature would not exist - the reward as we see for those involved in terror may not seem as such nor would be taken seriously as such by an Other culture i.e. suicide on behalf of the culture is rewarded by a God in the afterlife, but is also combined with earthly reward of access to sex via sexual slavery, rape of Other girls and women.

Frankly Other determine such 'few' are therefore not 'rational' suffering a 'mental illness' at their peril. For even if the terrorists or their supporters have a mental illness which research in the main have determined they do not their behavior would not have come into existence without the cultural codex construct of Other being existent in the first place.

We tend to see aberrant behavior defined as such in our own cultural 'rational' model as irrational in any other culture as a mental illness and therefore from our own perspective we may deem, or want to, to avoid severe cognitive dissonance or need to for political reasons that we are dealing with a very small number of 'mental' adherents, social psychologists, most of them, also know this is a myth. Whole of culture are therefore responsible via their cultural codex constructs and sufficient law-abiding concurrence to enable the altruistic enforcer 'few' appearance in our streets.

Cultures create the 'few' altruistic enforcers for a political purpose internal and/or external to the culture the nature of these interactions and intensity and methodology determined by the cultural codex. We can see before us what the Islamic/Muslim codex can be and is grotesquely analogized into regards Other and women before our very eyes yet we still protect it from challenge. This is what you are supporting all of it not just the piece which is really your own rational model being reflected back at you. And if you were honest and having read the Islamic/Muslim codex from cover to cover, reflected on the constructs and simply considered what could be analogised from such constructs do you really believe Other and women are suffering from an irrational fear of what such a cultural codex can and will in time inform? That what you are seeing before you could in no way be connected back to these cultural constructs, if you do its incumbent upon you then to identify where this adherent behavior is sourced from which other cultural codex - as there has to be one to justify your view. You simply cannot claim it is not Islam and walk away.

Malcolm Turnbull points to power of Internet at summit discussing growing terror threat
By political reporter Stephanie Anderson ABC 15/10/2015

Radicalised youth in Australia need little more than wi-fi and a computer." this is a lie for it would mean every culture would be informing the same behavior, it is also a ridiculous comment for what happened prior to the existence of both when the exact same Islamic/Muslim ethic-moral-belief-behavior existed to inform terror-genocide against Other? And importantly these previous lower technological methods will be used and those utilised adapted once it is realized using such technological advanced devices are open to review by Other. These are communication devices which are simply reflective of previous less technological methods of triggering already existent cultural established prejudice against Other. It is the underlying cultural imbued prejudice, categorisation engine regards Other which is the problem created by the cultures codex construct of Other this codex construct remains to influence new generations the terror remains with or without wi-fi and a computer.

Technology of course may speed the process but its absence may slow but not stop it. More importantly "Radicalised youth" need to be 'radicalised' even before the psychological key triggers participation in violence against Other and this does not even need an external 'radicaliser - hate preacher' to turn the key as the codex itself sets the required hate 'categorisation engine' regards Other those external inputs which can trigger violence against Other. The so called 'lone wolf' therefore does not exist they simply represent the cultural wholes inculcation and reward process driven by the Islamic/Muslim codex they are the culture. 

One simply has to pose the question can the 'radicalised/prejudiced' youth come into existence without the existence of an adult law-abiding driven cultural inculcation process which leads to the 'few' being sourced from the law-abiding ranks informing terror against Other? How can the 'radicalised' be produced from a law-abiding non-radicalised paradigm which contains no inherent prejudice constructs against Other? They cannot be produced under such a system because there should be no 'categorisation engine' able to be utilised to inform terror against Other therefore the law-abiding are just a culpable as those 'few' the culture creates to pull the trigger.

"Australian Federal Police boss Andrew Colvin told 7.30 the issue of terrorism was becoming more difficult to manage.

"We're shocked that a 12-year-old is on the police radar for these type of matters," he said.

"Yes, the problem is getting worse for Australia, not better.""
Malcolm Turnbull points to power of Internet at summit discussing growing terror threat
By political reporter Stephanie Anderson ABC 15/10/2015

And why is "the problem is getting worse for Australia, not better." because if they have any psychologists advising them they had better ditch them as it should have been explained to Australian Federal Police boss Andrew Colvin by now why you have to be more frightened of five year old Mohammad prematurely developing the physical capacity to pull a trigger than a 12 year old. And it has been known why for some time.

Why are they lying to us? My view is they do not want it to be known the real damage the prejudice to enable the trigger to be pulled happens quite a few years before 12 years of age, before a child can confidently point and pull the trigger and before they can effectively communicate across the Internet and therefore this prejudice is developed within the families, communities, institutions claiming to be the 'good' law-abiding and therefore they are culpable for the intensity of prejudice inculcated into Muslim young minds which is the actual cause of the terror.

"This is a real home grown threat. And it appals all Australians and it appals all Muslim Australians." Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull 
Malcolm Turnbull points to power of internet at summit discussing growing terror threat
By political reporter Stephanie Anderson ABC 15/10/2015

The depth of Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull's stated denial and delusion inherent in "it appals all Muslim Australians." from a social psychological perspective deems such a statement bordering on the psychotic. If it was indeed true no Muslim terror would exist delivered by the young nor the old supported by the young nor the old. We are not going to solve this problem lying to ourselves the Islamic/Muslim cultures 'good' law-abiding citizens are not delivering the 'few' straight from their own ranks.

Also worse it simply aggravates those who clearly know it is not true as they start to realise nothing is going to be done which will actually stop the terror against Other. The blatantly obvious attempted deception feeds rising frustration, anger and simply increases the motivation to resolve the situation with countervailing force. It is a stupid tactic. Then they not only become even more astounded at terror emanating from even younger children they are now equally amazed terror starts coming from their own culture. They have enabled both yet everyone else is to blame.

The argument has never been about an attack upon multiculturalism, upon diversity nor upon race this would be ridiculous, for in this globalized world of course many cultures, races need to exist in the same space and most do but tragically some not only do not live harmoniously with Other they cannot due to their cultural codex construct of Other.

We know these constructs in secular ideological forms inform terror-genocide but we currently alas live in denial and dangerous delusion despite the dead bodies piling up even now in our streets religions do not or we are willing to accept religious derived terror-genocide as a price to pay for holding to the construct of Freedom of Religion.

Freedom of Religion itself paradoxically created to prevent the very circumstance to which we are now subject terror-genocide from differing religious and secular cultural codex genocide constructs of Other - the trouble is Freedom of Religion as a Western construct did not have as its signatory the Islamic/Muslim culture and nor could it, nor can it for the Islamic/Muslim core codex recognizes no political form other than its own should dominate in time the space within which it exists. The Islamic State, the Saudi Arabia's wahabism, Iranian guardian political models are the realization of the true believer form of Islam analogised straight from the constructs contained in the core Islamic/Muslim cultural codex.

In fact Freedom of Religion came into being in the West in the main as a reaction to consolidate Christianity who were fighting debilitating wars against an onslaught of Muslims invading through middle Europe.

The argument in the streets and in this document is an objection against the notion of Multiculturalism being utilised to justify the inclusion of a culture with genocide and misogyny within its ideological constructs informing the same in its cultural behavioral variance as it has from the seventh century. It is an argument which does not differentiate between secular or religious ideologies informing the same.

The core requirements of an individual human and their culture is security for they and their families, communities, to live in peace so that they can as nature and their culture and other cultures in the same space enable a flourishing life.

Islamic/Muslim cultural derived systemic terror-genocide against Other cultures clearly increases insecurity and redirection of resource on such a vast scale as to diminish Other cultures adherents capacity to achieve a flourishing life, and therefore there needs to be an urgent review of the Democratic societal constructs of freedom of religion and the definition of Multiculturalism.

Freedom to follow your faith, and seek to advance your ideology secular or religious within any societal space does not exist as an inalienable right, as freedom is always qualified as humanity has already learnt certain cultural codex constructs be they inherent in religious or secular ideologies (faiths) will inform terror-genocide against Other and subjugation of women to Man's 'leadership' and control of women's sexuality.

Terror-genocide against Other cultures nor subjugation of women to Man's will derived from any culture is acceptable within a Democratic multicultural space. Such cultures informing such terror-genocide against Other and misogynistic practices against women lose all right to exist in a Democratic multicultural space. Why? History has already proven accepting such cultures which such diametrically opposed values to Other cultures with their cultural codex genocide construct of Other will in time inform terror-major schism in a Democratic multicultural space.

It can no longer be a matter of 'educating' citizens as to their responsibilities and behaviours regards each other as individuals in Democracies which necessarily contain many cultures due to our globalized world, as cultures set the behavioral variance within which their adherents exist it is a matter of reviewing what a cultures responsibilities and behaviours regards each other culture in their same space have to be and abide by for any culture to be accepted to and remain in a Democratic multicultural space.

"Enough is enough. It is time to speak out.

“Islam is innocent” is an incomplete sentence. Introspection is needed, for, if we shy away from reality, the alternative will be more images like those we witnessed last Tuesday night, when brave Lt. Muath Al Kasasbeh was burnt to death in a cage."

‘We have a problem’ by Zaid Nabulsi The Jordon Times Feb 10, 2015

Zaid Nabulsi also has a problem, Zaid Nabulsi points out ‘We (Muslims) have a problem’, "Wahabism has entirely replaced, and become, Sunni Islam; the two cannot be told apart anymore" but even then Zaid Nabulsi refuses to accept the cause of the 'EXTREMIST' Muslim as he perceives it Wahabism in fact has to be and is directly derived from and able to be analogised from the core Islamic/Muslim codex. The problem for humanity still remains even if Wahabism were to be deleted as a Muslim codex - the possibility of this happening is what in your opinion?.

The actual core problem is this: 
Not every Muslim is a terrorist. Not every Muslim subjects Other to a political space of less, excluded from determining their future and their childrens on equal terms with Muslims in the same political space. Not every Muslim commits genital mutilation, enforces child marriage or subjects Other women to sexual slavery, torture and rape but every Muslim by their adherence to a cultural codex which contains clear genocide constructs of Other and clear constructs of women being subject to and less than Man who also control their sexuality particularly of Other women enables such actions since the seventh century to this very minute to be analogised via the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex into the resultant Islamic/Muslim behavioral variance informing the tragic reality Other and women have to face generation after generation. The 'few' altruistic enforcers as psychologists very well know are created and sustained by the 'many' otherwise the 'few' would never come into existence.

"Enough is enough." Not one death, not one is worth the price of such a culture being in our midst. No more, No more.... There is no excuse for visiting terror-genocide upon fellow humans to even attempt to justify such cultural derived behavior is sickening when Other cultures clearly have and do suffer 'marginalisation' which far outweighs anything which has happened to Muslims be they youth or adults in a Western space or even elsewhere.

“Mr Neumann (director of London's International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation) , speaking last month at the White House Summit to Counter Violent Extremism, touched on a somewhat overlooked aspect of the debate about radicalisation: while marginalisation and a lack of employment or education are common factors among young Western extremists, they are not always present.”
Why are young Australians being drawn to Islamic State? The causes and ways of combating the threat of radicalisation ABC, By Paul Donoughue and Lucy Fahey

"Literature on aggression often suggests that individual deficiencies, such as social incompetence, psychological difficulties, or troublesome home environments, are responsible for aggressive behavior. In this article, by contrast, we examine aggression from a social network perspective, arguing that social network centrality, our primary measure of peer status, increases the capacity for aggression and that competition to gain or maintain status motivates its use. We test these arguments using a unique longitudinal dataset that enables separate consideration of same- and cross-gender aggression. We find that aggression is generally not a maladjusted reaction typical of the socially marginal; instead, aggression is intrinsic to status and escalates with increases in peer status until the pinnacle of the social hierarchy is attained. Over time, individuals at the very bottom and those at the very top of a hierarchy become the least aggressive youth. We also find that aggression is influenced not so much by individual gender differences as by relationships with the other gender and patterns of gender segregation at school. When cross-gender interactions are plentiful, aggression is diminished. Yet these factors are also jointly implicated in peer status: in schools where cross-gender interactions are rare, cross-gender friendships create status distinctions that magnify the consequences of network centrality."
Status Struggles, Network Centrality and Gender Segregation in Same- and Cross-Gender Aggression, Robert Faris, Diane Felmlee, American Sociological Review February 2011 vol. 76 no. 1 48-73

There needs to be a developing political will to combat the apathy being purposefully developed by our current political elite to sweep the increasing hostility index and the bloodied bodies of Other under a justification paradigm of terror-genocide against Other under a label of 'marginalisation' clearly this is not the cause for all cultures subject to varying degrees of 'marginalization' would be informing the same. Clearly shooting police officers, burning peoples in cages, crucifixion, etc are not being generated by Other cultures relative to the Islamic/Muslim culture.

In combination with a move to renegotiate with cultures within a Democratic space what are the requirements demanded of them to remain within that space an approach worth taking along with such negotiations with amended and additional steps as detailed below to establish threat and form the basis for the political momentum/will for the removal of ideological genocide and misogynistic constructs:

"A great deal of foreign policy analysis relies on social and environmental factors, or anecdotal evidence. In seeking to address this problem in a more systematic manner, we move from an investigation centered around state actors to one focused on variation in individual behavior account for the combination of social, cultural, environmental, psychological, and biological differences. Our proposed approach to the study of political violence requires the integration of methods and skills from geneticists and neuroscientists with those in the behavioral and social sciences. Specifically, we seek to introduce an approach to study political violence which : (i) quantifies the effects of genes, environments, and their interaction on behavior; (ii) identifies specific genetic and environmental contexts that lead to such behavior; (iii) develops a comprehensive model of the biological and social pathways to political violence; (iv) identifies populations under specific circumstances which pose a higher or lower prevalence for any specific genes, neurobiological or environmental mechanisms which pose an increased liability for political violence; (v) develops mechanisms to identify individuals within given populations who are most at risk for committing violence, as well as those most resistant to such action; and (vi) creates environmental responses which can mitigate risk among those individuals."
A neurobiological approach to foreign policy analysis: identifying individual differences in political violence PK Hatemi, R McDermott - Foreign Policy Analysis, 2012

Given the necessity of v above and vi above and i-iv informs a systemic cultural propensity to deliver aggression, violence and subjugation of women which is/are deemed intractable my view is vi stands only with the addition of the phrase "..and between the source culture and the Other cultures affected internal and external to the source culture of the individuals and groups informing aggressive behaviors.". With the addition of (vii) where intractable systemic aggression is emanating from a culture creates evidence based proof of such intractability of systemic behavior to frame the political will to remove the cultures capacity to inform aggression from the Public Square. If this means total removal of a cultural codex from the Public Square so be it - is one brutalized life a codex so clearly enables worth such a cultural codex remaining?

Other will not stand still and take this escalating-continuing aggression without responding to nullify the force being used with an opposing force of higher magnitude in an attempt to achieve and maintain Maslow's level 2 - Safety and security needs - personal security, health and well-being, also Other will push back because of the financial (resource) security jeopardised by having to waste scarce resources simply to defend itself from a culture systemically informing violence against them.

Those supporting the attacking culture to believe individuals from Others culture will not seek such security really is delusional, those following such a course as enabling a culture with a genocide construct against Other can be expected to be perceived as enabling the attacking cultures behavior, which they in fact are, and will be dealt with according to established cultural defined response relative to the perceived threat being enabled and where it is perceived as being sourced from.

Victims were paralysed by fear as I fired: Breivik recounts island youth camp massacre in horrifying detail Daily Mail By Christian Gysin In Oslo and Simon Tomlinson 20 April 2012

The Trollhättan killer didn’t become an extremist overnight. Somebody could have stopped him Bjørn Ihler The Guardian Saturday 24 October 2015

How true yet those who could have stopped it actually are the very ones who started it our very own Western cultural gatekeepers.

German mayoral candidate Reker stabbed over refugee support BBC 17 October 2015

Two teenagers arrested over fire at Britain’s biggest mosque by Dave Burke, Metro 27 Sep 2015

This is how you have decided the significant differences in the 'rational' models between the Islamic/Muslim culture and Other cultures are to play themselves out in our streets. It is a failed strategy proven to be so how many times in the past.

I am totally against such a strategy as well as the inevitable I repeat inevitable response from Other cultures you have unleashed by your own policy settings. One would expect as atrocities occur and nothing is done to remove the offending cultural codex the methods will I believe tragically reflect the terror being utilised against Other. Why? Because terror/fear is seen to work if it works for the attacking culture, Other may very well determine wrongly as far as I am concerned to respond in kind.

Fair enough Islam contains a cultural genocide construct of Other and Pathological Altruists in Canberra and elsewhere are committing Western cultural suicide on our behalf but violence to remove Islam from the Public Square sets you on a path to continually inform the same.

There is an alternative to the track we are on and yes it may lead to worsening violence in the short to medium term as you would expect with a cultural genocide construct of Other but I believe it will in the long term lead to an increasing possibility of a flourishing life for those in a Democratic multicultural space rather than where we are clearly heading and currently exist the precipice of Cruickshank's "fantastic object-lesson" and Hillson's culture of friendship and peace when both clearly reported the evidence before them of an absence of both - only ever a lull before resource and political thresholds are reached once again. 

“It (Damascus-Syria) has seen empires and tyrants come and go; it offers a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony. It is a wonderful city in which to be. …. a fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony" British Historian Dan Cruickshank BBC series "Cruickshank's Adventures in Architecture, Episode 5 - Connections, Syria, Damascus 2008, First aired on BBC Two in April 2008

Despite the clear evidence in his own writings of the evidence of Other missing from the German streets, the "Experience has taught me that all argument is useless with fanatical young Nazi of this kind, and so I say nothing.", the observation from the very mouths of our current political elite as well as the Islamic/Muslim leaders after each additional atrocity  “In fact, if the extremist’s elements had prevailed. I have not the least doubt that disruption would have been more drastic and that we should have real reason by now to fear German aggression from both a military as well as political point of view.” Norman Hillson continues “the Germans (inclusive of the Nazi with their Mien Kampf cultural genocide construct of Other) that great unified people are looking for peace and see friendship with Britain as a basis for peace not only for themselves but for everyone else”. Norman Hillson “I speak of Germany”, London 1937

Fiction reflecting the analogised reality humanity face with both codex.  You are mistaken regards the text 'some are merely symbolic' and this is the twenty-first century of course Muslims do not use that 'old text' - Muslims do as we know, in Indonesia's conservative Aceh province and spaces Muslims inhabit there are intensification of the utilisation of 'old text' as well as increasing calls for such constructs to operate within Western Democratic space

"Have you read Mein Kampf? It's so expensive most of my men can't do so. I pick up a copy here and there as I can, to lend to leaders; and I read aloud, key sentences, at most meetings. By and by there'll be a popular edition, that will help a great deal. But probably you haven't needed to wait for that." Horst Wessel Strum Abteilung SA Nazi leader

"No I have read the book. Some of it is very moving. But other portions are almost revolting." Hans Christain soon to be a good Strum Abteilung SA Nazi comrade

"Isn't that rather a strong expression? Are you sure you understand the parts that trouble you? Some are factual, some are merely symbolic. I'd be glad to go over them with you, a page at a time, if you feel it would be helpful.Occasionally two heads are better than one, you know, in cases of this kind." Horst Wessel

"You're probably right. I may have read into it meanings that don't exist, partly because I've had such guilty feelings about owning it at all...." 
Hans Christain 
The Great Tradition by Frances Parkinson Keyes, first edition Oct 1939

"In a pattern that resembles the competition between Protestant fundamentalists and liberal modernists in the United States a century ago,39 the destabilization of hierarchies in the Muslim world has unleashed "competition and contest over both the interpretation of [religious] symbols and control of the institutions, formal and informal, that produce and sustain them."40 Mass education and mass marketing have intensified the competition, creating vast but segmented audiences for Islamic books, newspapers, and arts.41"Civil Islam: Muslims and Democratization in Indonesia, Robert W. Hefner

It is not a matter of "competition and contest over both the interpretation of [religious] symbols" as with the view in 1939 of Nazi text being determined "almost revolting" it is the fact not fiction that the 'symbols' (whatever that means) of either can and already historically have been analogised into terror-genocide against Other. 

It is the fact Islamic/Muslim so called "symbols" can be analogised into terror-genocide against Other, not I repeat not the fact adherents or non-adherents determine such an interpretation meets or does not meet the intended meaning for clearly it does enable such behavior of terror-genocide to be justified and authorised by the 'symbols', nor is a determination that these are 'old symbols' not relevant to today to be taken seriously for clearly the Islamic/Muslim codex itself stipulates such a determination cannot be made.

What do just the two bloodied bodies of Other disregarding the thousands of Other provided irrefutable evidence for regards the 'merely symbolic' just the 'old text'? Really? Saying look there are certain 'moderate' law-abiding citizens who do not agree does not stop their, their cultural codex systemically informing terror-genocide with the actual perpetrator 'few' created and sustained from their law-abiding ranks.
Must we have history repeat itself because you would look foolish before your peer group if you recant your previous belief - are humanity to suffer for your vanity?

The argument is for the exclusion from Democratic multicultural space of an ideological Islamic/Muslim construct which clearly can be shown to be at its core in time historically and currently as anti-multicultural, anti-diversity. It is not an argument against race because the Islamic/Muslim culture is clearly made up of many races it is against the Islamic/Muslim culture terror-genocide and misogynistic ethic-moral-ideological construct informing evil against Other and women and therefore justifiably if security is a core requirement of an individual and society the ideological Islamic/Muslim construct can be justifiable removed from continuing to inform evil against Other and women.

What proof have you that this Islamic/Muslim culture is not already informing the same or will not continue to inform the same it has informed elsewhere in time and space? If you have no proof then I for one demand the Islamic/Muslim culture be removed from our Australian Democratic multicultural space to stop it informing the terror and major schism it has elsewhere and has commenced doing in our own Australian space.

What do we lose by starting such a conversation regards redefining a Multicultural society which excludes culturally derived terror and genocide, what do we gain?

Not one more citizen not one more police officer not one more of our military is worth retaining such a culture in our midst, no culture should be allowed in a Democratic Multicultural space if that culture systemically informs terror-genocide against Other cultures and at the same time sickeningly demand they be given jobs-resources so they will not commit atrocities against Other cultures - it is grotesque. And even if Other complied with such cultural blackmail as history clearly informs us pandering to such a culture enables in time increased terror not less - for fear has worked.

A reflection upon a paraphrased conversation on 666 ABC Radio Canberra 15/10/2015 between ABC announcer & Lieutenant General Retired David Morrison Chair of the Diversity Council Australia Ltd

The Muslim behavioral variance - all of it:

1. 'If you're Muslim, we can't be friends': Woman embraces protester outside mosque Kate Burke October 15, 2015

Walked across the road to embrace Other.

2. Terror shooting: Teen killer ‘turned’ at Parramatta mosque THE AUSTRALIAN Dan Box & Jennine Khalik OCTOBER 5, 2015

Walked down the road to shoot another Other in the head.

Does the first behavior above cancel the second behavior and the one before that and will the first behavior above stop the second from occurring ever again? In other words what weight on a culture to culture basis has the first behavior for Other cultures for the future in the same space when both behaviors emanate from the same institutional ethic-moral-behavior setter-reinforcer space a Muslim mosque?

Will such overt displays of the first behavior in an endeavor to send a message "Our culture is no threat see I want to be your friend." by any number of the always invariably existent 'good' law-abiding adherents from within a cultural behavioral variance, be it secular or religious, which contains a clearly identifiable genocide construct of Other with bloodied victims already in the street to prove it, stop the culturally derived terror-genocide being perpetrated against Other? Has it elsewhere with the same religion or other secular ideologies with exactly the same genocide construct of Other? Once the terror-genocide has ended, Cruickshank's "fantastic object-lesson", 
what is invariably the status of Other and the conditions they are now subject to if they actually still exist in the space?

'Current opposition to immigration of the Islamic culture is reflective of the White Australia policy and fear of being overwhelmed by the Asian hordes which has been reflected in each wave of immigration into Australia and therefore the current hostility to Islamic/Muslim immigration will pass. The current target is the Middle Eastern young Male whereas previously it was the Italian, Vietnamese, Chinese, ....' ABC announcer

"Australians are at their best when embracing diversity." Lieutenant General Retired David Morrison Chair of the Diversity Council Australia Ltd

The is no doubt any individual human as well as groups who engender openness to Other cultures and the differing cultural views and practices - 'embrace diversity' have a lot to gain and clearly Australian citizens are much richer not in a monetary sense for working through difficult cultural merging times to become a country of such diversity, with many of our extended families being multicultural in nature and very much better for it.

But we have to be honest about the reality of what the Australian community now faces is a significantly different circumstance, and claiming these are simply the same issues being rehashed as in the past is a lie, you can pretend this is the case but the two bloodied bodies in our streets and more to come determine such a claim as sickeningly obscene.

The previous waves of immigration in the past were not having to be resolved by inter-cultural violence and attempted subjugation of Other cultures in our Australian space informed by the incoming culture, the reason being previous cultures did not have a genocide construct of Other hard coded into their cultural codex, and at their core accepted the secular politic overriding authority within a Democratic multicultural construct where the Islamic/Muslim cultural behavioural variance framed by its political codex forms clearly does not, reflected into our Australian space currently with the two bloodied bodies, but clearly for all of humanity to see across time and space elsewhere.

Please Explain: Nazi (Hitler-Mein Kampf) & Muslim (Mohammed-Quran) Cultural Codex Construct of Other. Why it is One Is and One Is-Not. Yet both = "I don't mean participated, I mean observed."

To believe Australia can return to the time when the Islamic/Muslim culture in essence reflected the dominating Australian Democratic multicultural 'rational' model right across its behavioural variance is past. The Islamic/Muslim culture has in Australia reached the resource political thresholds where they now no longer feel constrained by the dominant cultures ethos and are moving to analogise the true nature of their ideological constructs into the Australian space. This is not unusual for cultures who are in the minority having to reflect or believing to advance in a space dominated by Other cultures their true ideological reflection are suppressed.

Now with almost any other culture existent upon earth this would be of no threat to Other cultures in the same space but surely when you simply look across our fence historic and current what do you honestly see informed in the spaces the Islamic/Muslim culture have achieved dominance and also on the methods to obtain such dominance and then maintain it - What always happens to Other cultures? The two bloodied bodies in our streets mean in reality we are at war with a culture in our own space the 'few' the altruistic enforcers are created by 'good' law-abiding 'many' created by the cultural codex of which the whole culture the 'few' and the 'many' determine as their core ethics-morals-behavioural template.

I would like it to be different I would like to actually believe as the ABC announcer and Lieutenant General Retired David Morrison Chair of the Diversity Council Australia that there is nothing to fear for Australian citizens this will pass - but frankly ask yourself has this happened elsewhere. 

Vast resources redirected better spent on enabling a flourishing life for Australian citizens rather than wasted on protecting ourselves from another culture in the same space, the symbolic and physical changes which indicate a political elites perceived understanding despite the rhetoric of nothing to fear is a lie, our Democratic multicultural institutions face real threat where we have doors closed off in for instance our High court and Parliament houses to funnel us through security checks, travel restrictions, etc. setting High levels of threat, rising social hostility indexes not only in Australian societies with terror developing from the opposite side because the political elite is actually encouraging the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex containing the genocide construct of Other to be more easily imbued within adherents via it ethical-moral-behavioural setter-reinforcer institutions where even the Egypt government has found because of security concerns thousands needed to be shut down and we have Mi5 British intelligence service paying Muslims to spy on Muslims in such places. Of course the social hostility indexes will rise along with the bloodied bodies in our streets it is not quantum physics.

All this indicates it is just the same as the past and all will pass and we will all live happily ever after do you seriously believe this Lieutenant General Retired David Morrison Chair of the Diversity Council Australia? If you say yes then please explain what is different in the Islamic/Muslim cultural codex which is different say than in Kenya in Nigeria in Egypt in Syria in Pakistan in Lebanon in .... Explain how the two bloodied bodies in our streets already and the many to come prove it is simply the same old story?

I love diversity but what I will not embrace are cultures secular or religious whose cultural codex contains a genocide construct of Other and will, not may, in time and space analogise such a construct into the streets as the two bloodied bodies prove to anyone with an open mind.

I am all for a multicultural society and also very aware of the good an adherent of a cultural codex containing a genocide construct can do, as I am sure many of the Nazi did in Germany even a ‘good’ SS Nazi Panza lieutenant felt revulsion regards fellow Nazi treatment of Jews in Poland but does this ‘good’ in the cultural variance whole stop the flow of victims caused by the ‘evil’ situated in the exact same cultural behavioural variance with which the ‘good’ interact and whose core codex constructs of Other are exactly the same – therefore and I believe justifiably I very concerned for my fellow citizens as to what will continue to come from the rest of the Muslim behavioural variance created by the very same ‘good’ law-abiding adherents determined as the means of stemming not stopping the terror from their very own ranks, as it does from a Nazi behavioural variance yet we excuse one but not the other?

Reflect Lieutenant General Retired David Morrison. In my opinion your hope for the future for a harmonious peaceful multicultural society as is my hope is overriding the reality we face, I hope my view is wrong for all our sakes, that the future bias inherent in your conversation on the ABC prevents you from dealing with the reality on the ground will lead in time to completely the opposite of what you and I hope for.

Please note I do not believe this is a matter of not enough contact with the Muslim community, and of course you can be friends with a Muslim even if you believe they are an adherent of a cultural codex which contains a genocide construct there are always the 'good' existent in all cultural behavioral variances any one from a large family knows that. I have had in depth discussions with Muslims and agreed to disagree, have interaction with what I determine as a very good, kind and gentle person as you would ever hope to find in a Muslim professional person I have contact with regularly, also have had a brief encounter with a Muslim who said he had the right to physically attack me if I challenged any aspect of his religion that was some many years ago. My wife was spat upon in a Muslim country we were visiting by burqa clad women in a passing land rover very adroit I know - so this is my point there exist the good invariably in any cultural behavioral variance and the evil but there are a only very few cultural behavioral variances secular and religious which inside they hold not only no respect for Other but as well they are systemically intent of committing terror and genocide against Other.

"The use of force and violence is more commonplace and prevalent in some families, communities, religions, cultural/ethnic groups and societies based on the views and values about adult prerogatives with children espoused. They may also be based upon the sociopathy of the perpetrators." Treatment of Complex Trauma Courtois/Ford @2016

Sociopathy groups of people who adopt belief systems which cause them to behave in a similar fashion.

The Islamic/Muslim codex can analogise the following into any space I repeat into any space the proof is the following behavior of the 'many' exists it is a matter of record not imagined for a political purpose to malign a particular culture.

Farkhunda ‘didn’t burn Koran’: Afghanistan mob killed innocent woman MARCH 25, 2015

My view is simply this, there is not one victim, not one worth the price of enabling such a cultural variance no matter the number of so called relative good compared to the 'few' they produce to inform systemic terror and genocide against Other.

The redemption Paradigm and the terrible consequences for rewarding destructive aberrant behavior. - Rewarding the holders of the Islamic/Muslim cultural Terror and Genocide categorisation engine regards Other. The Dangerously Naive Psychologist at work.

"Terrorism is the result of a breakdown in which criminal behavior is accepted and supported." Countering Terrorism from the Middle East R. Jerry Adams, Ph.D. Evaluation and Development Institute

“It is important to listen to and understand an individual’s reasons for becoming involved in violent extremism in order to later assist them. It is also important to make the distinction between their behaviour and who they are as a person. Even if you disagree with what they are saying, it is important that they know they are accepted and supported as a person.”
PREVENTING VIOLENT EXTREMISM AND RADICALISATION IN AUSTRALIA Attorney-General’s Department © Commonwealth of Australia 2015

It is the measure of the intellect involved in current terror-genocide policy that “accepted and supported as a person” determines you are able to separate the nature of a person and the behaviour they exhibit, where the behaviour would not exist if the nature-the person did not exist. You are therefore accepting and supporting the terrorist-genocide behaviour because by accepting and supporting a person as you are accepting their nature as being worthy of acceptance and support the very same nature-person which informs terror-genocide.

You create an imaginary husk of a human separate from behaviour which cannot be delinked from the very nature, beliefs, ethics, morals, motivation which creates the behaviour itself – the person. It is the exact same logic as determining a ball has not rolled down the hill because of gravity, you have to accept gravity has nothing to do with the action you see before you it is another Kafkaesque invention to determine all human behaviours should not be ‘judged’ as evil or ‘good’ they are simply behaviours of no relative significance. Why have a justice system at all.

This approach as in the drug scene of a lack of appropriate punitive outcomes for destructive behaviour to self or others (both exist in the same space) where see increasing drug deaths and related illness, psychosis etc rather than diminishment as these promoters promise, is going to see the same with Other being brutally murdered in the streets. After each new atrocity the same claims of not enough resources (Farhad Jabar: show us the money, says Parramatta mosque leader)
, education, etc whilst everyone else is to blame the US, Israel. ‘marginalisation’, bullying at public schools, security surveillance (which would not be needed if the threat did not exist), Others prejudice, phobia against a culture informing terror against it,… You do not punish such severe aberrant behaviour in fact psychologically pander to it, do not apply swift and public punishment which is seen by whole of culture, what do you think is going to happen? 

Cultures who create these terrorists know the principle well. And clearly it is working otherwise we would not be hearing all these excuses not only for the terrorists themselves but the culture which creates them.

Terror-genocide behaviour is not simply smoking too many cigarettes, being rude to your school teacher, being aggressive in family gatherings and you simply need to be taken aside and have a good quite talk about your behaviour. Everything is relative we do not put parking ticket violators into prison for fifty years and murderers in community service. We do the reverse for a reason it is cultural punishment relative to the severity of the crime as defined by a cultural codex categorisation engine regards human behaviour.

Terror and genocide are now to be seen as just needing a good talking to it is not really the person it is the behaviour – this is not only invalid it is dangerously stupid for it does not apply the appropriate punishment to dissuade others doing the same and overall will not stop those even who are caught up being involved in this counterproductive paradigm of ceasing at some level in support of their existing belief system to involve themselves in such acts in the future or enable others to do so, be it active involvement or which can be just as damaging acquiescence.

Also a very important component is missing the behaviour is a particular cultural construct these persons are the true believer altruistic enforcers driven more by cultural imperative than personal ambition from an individualistic western perspective so simply determining this is an individual person ‘problem’ is a dangerous error.

Organisms simply do not develop behavioural traits just for the fun of it. Behaviour is utilised by an organism to achieve desired outcomes in the real world. A lion has not developed a violent aggressive trait simply to pick flowers. A lion has done so to chase down prey-food and tear it apart and survive. Also this violent aggressive trait is utilised within the lion species to set, impose and maintain social order.

Cultural behavoral traits therefore are reflective of the need to attain certain outcomes otherwise they would not exist. It would be expected the relative level of violent aggression inherent in any culture (cultural codex) will be reflective of the cultures awareness that such violent aggression because of the internal constructs – political inter-personal behaviours and/or Other group categorisation requires such violence and aggression to maintain internal adherence to precepts ie women subject to Man and subjugation of Other to the precepts of the culture in their space and acceptance of the cultures political constructs which may possibly determine Other as subject.

As with a lion in a zoo it does not suddenly become what it is not, as with cultures within Others space they do change the nature of their interaction in time and space when placed in a resource and politic position (Cruickshank's 'fantastic object-lesson' precipice) to commence to enforce adherence to precepts internal and external to the culture i.e. women and Other are not going to accept the precepts without the predetermined level of violence and aggression the culture itself has developed in response to resistance against those precepts.

In otherwords you expect to solve this by pretending a husk is a person completely delinked from their behaviour and ‘accept and support’ persons whose nature informs terrorist-genocide, thereby sending no punitive message for such behavior individual or culture, without addressing the real problem the culture which has this behavioural trait inherent in its cultural behavioural variance which must exist for a reason and therefore is not going to go away because you are nice, which will not may create more, you are sending us down a path strewn with your victims, your victims.

Be assured if ever by chance there is a change of the political paradigm I would have you in front of a justice system to have you account for these victims you by your dangerous policy decisions enabled. For each one of them. Wishful thinking only as the chance of that happening is nil so you are safe continue what you do so well. Just remember when the next and the next ... some of us do not believe for one minute you are not in part culpable for not attacking the actual cause the culture itself and simply content to deal with 'acceptance and support' the symptoms.

Those so oh so 'sanguine' about the fact everything is working so well with two shot in the head and many to come, the fact it could be worse there are only a small number of casualties from the ‘one wolf’ attacks rather than Al-Qaeda car bomb attacks so all is well with the world, it is the US, Israel, bullying, anything but the real cause and the critics simply have only a three word answer and the world is oh so much more complex. 

If it were all true as you say every culture would be informing the exact same behavior they are not therefore your reasoning is invalid as are your assumptions I repeat for the hard of hearing 'every culture would be informing the same behavior they are not'.

Making it more complex by drawing in any number of symptoms and determining how in touch with reality you are as our citizens continue to be shot down in streets not only in Australia whilst participating in the most gigantic piece of deleterious groupthink the world has ever seen must give you a very nice smug feeling you are so right – look at all the Phds lining up – trouble is history determines you as dangerous idiots for what you allow to occur as well as the bodies before us.

Yes “It’s culture stupid.” And there is nothing to prove it? Not one victim is worth managing a cultures terror-genocide into our streets, not one. This is what you have been employed for and with each new victim, do not forget it.

The First Globalised Insurgency by a Culture to enforce and/or align Other to its core value systems - Islamic/Muslim Cultural terror-genocide the method as it has to be as it always has been.

The affect of Type II repetitive/complex trauma internally generated purposefully, necessarily by the Islamic/Muslim culture via their cultural codex 'rational' model construct of Other to inform hyperarousal states of aggression, impulsivity, disinhibited behavior regards Other enabled by Others cultural gatekeepers, informing Type II repetitive/complex trauma within Other cultures generates Other adherent reactive behavior in an attempt to reassert Other cultural homeostasis - Maslow's level 2. Safety needs - security, order, law, stability, freedom from fear at least and protect the Others cultural constructs methodology for achieving Maslow's levels  3 to 5.

As it is a culture (Islamic/Muslim) upon culture (Other) attack events inside/outside local, national borders contribute to Others complex trauma as they see their own Other culture adherents being murdered and subjugated and their very own Other supposed 'protectors' their cultural gatekeepers enabling not stopping the terror/genocide against their very own Other culture-ignoring all of the inherent Islamic/Muslim cultural behavioral variance - as institutions ignore a pedophiles behavior because overall they are 'good' and really do not want to deal with the complexities and prefer to blame the victim for being a victim and of course the victim provoked the perpetrator= betrayal of trust.

What psychological state are cultural gatekeepers perpetrating against citizens from their own culture by allowing the Islamic/Muslim codex terror/genocide construct to be analogised into Others streets:

"Complex trauma not only involves shock, fear, terror, or powerlessness (either short or long term) but also, more fundamentally constitutes a violation of .. and a challenge to the development of a positive and secure self, as major psychic energy is directed toward survival and defense rather than learning and personal development."

Social psychologists what do you know is going to happen in fact is happening? Increasing violent attacks upon gatekeepers and their political support reflecting the methodology of the attacking culture really unexpected and not to worsen as the social hostility index increase along with the inevitable successful/non-successful attacks on Other cultures by the Islamic/Muslim culture? Where the 'non-successful' attacks in essence achieve their aim and cannot be in reality considered by Other security services as a win - in fact represent a continuing failure of politic?

It is important to understand we are no longer distinct Nation states globalisation in terms of the control we have of our own individual affairs have significantly diminished and our borders are becoming more and more open to outside influence and dominance by a world of varying cultural 'rational' models, ideologies secular and religious, and these ideologies-cultures actions. Our societies are not separate in ideological terms from Nations around us we can not determine our core ideological precepts of the same named elsewhere in the world as being significantly different and not reflective around a mean world ‘rational’ model. 

Our cultures have been globalized we cannot simply say anymore we are Australian Social democrats, Marxists, Catholics, Protestants, Muslims, Liberals, Conservatives, perceived left-middle-right within our usual National state space and this is where the struggle for political space will in the main occur for all these constructs are influenced and influence relatively in time and space those outside immediate communities.

Increasing globalization has meant, as was predicted, ideologies-cultures with significantly opposed value systems particularly with deleterious constructs of Other would come into increasing conflict with Other cultures - this was specifically forecast regards the Islamic/Muslim culture - and despite howls of protest at the time this evaluation of such a schism between the Islamic/Muslim culture occurring what has happened what will happen?

Studies of insurgencies have concluded it takes at least 10% of the culture as a proportion of the overall society to sustain an insurgency frankly from my view point this simply does not apply within a globalised world given increased access to communications, transportation, resources available to cultural altruistic enforcers across borders.

The claim the Muslim culture is less than 3% in any particular Nation space and the risk of developing major schism is exaggerated, and there will be no, burning buildings, broken bodies and lives in the streets really is therefore a dangerous view to take - clearly humanity have found out globalisation has meant external and internal Islamic/Muslim culture combined informs actions within and outside ones borders, the cost of which has been a vast redirection (waste of resources) simply to protect ourselves from a culture which has been allowed to flourish in our public and private spheres. Obama recently indicated the US alone is spending one trillion dollars on counter-terrorism and lest we forget the two bloodied bodies in Australian streets.

The fact is we are at war with a culture, the Islamic/Muslim culture, on a global scale these insurgent 'few' altruistic (pro-social) enforcers are created by the culture external and internal to a Nation States space and they do not appear having manufactured their own beliefs-ethics-morals-motivation nor methodology nor reason for their existence the Islamic/Muslim culture is responsible and the proof is these 'few' come directly from the 'moderate' Islamic/Muslim law-abiding families, communities, and institutions. The proof is the similarity of the Islamic/Muslim cultural defined justification and authorisation for the ‘fews’ behaviour and political constructs they seek to create.

Determining therefore that the reason for the 'turning' of the young and the gullible are in the main due to external factors such as ISIS, Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Taliban, etc. 'hate preachers' ignores the fact in the main these very same Islamic/Muslim 'hate preachers' are generated from our very own Western Democratic multicultural space in the first place and also ignores the fact we, you and I, no longer exist as ideologies-cultures separate from those which exist outside our Nation state borders.

Trying to solve such a globalised insurgency by just addressing the symptoms the so called 'young' and the 'gullible' when there have to be significantly more adult and 'not gullible' as determined by their very own 'rational' model imbuing infant-children with the cultural prejudiced to jump ethically to culturally 'rationalising' the methodology of terror-genocide in the first place and therefore never stopping the developmental psychological state of the Islamic/Muslim  'young' and the 'gullible' (only from Others 'rational' model perspective) really is managing a cultures terror into your own back yard - what do you expect those from Other cultures will start to think of their own cultural gatekeepers allowing such terror-genocide to be inflicted increasingly upon them?

And the following indicates what regards the deceit those Muslims pursuing Western Democratic demise being slightly or more so psychologically challenged 'gullible' 'brainwashed' youth - the following simply supports research they are anything but.

"And they are not stupid. This is the first asymmetric warfare based insurgency to go conventional and make it work in hundreds of years. ISIS is a high tech, media savvy, multi-billion dollar organization that is operating on a global platform against the most sophisticated counter-insurgency operations on the planet, and they are not losing."
Jihadists Don’t Walk ,October 5, 2015, by Matt Perriss (former British army officer)

Yes they do 'walk' in fact it is expected as in any war they will do whatever it takes. How many times do we have to hear from so called 'military/security' experts "They (the enemy) will not do that."?

"Two men who French police are seeking to identify in connection with the Paris attacks registered as migrants with Greek authorities earlier this year, the Greek police have confirmed."
Paris attacks: Two men linked to attacks 'registered as migrants' The Australian,

This is a globalised Islamic/Muslim insurgency-war against Other cultures which is being informed by Islamic/Muslim cultures codex construct of Other external and internal to Nations states space so any Islamic/Muslim cultures apologies or claims of not supporting terror-genocide really are meaningless as we see after each apology, and the wearing of 'I Love Other' branded t-shirts now becoming very tattered from overuse, continuing attempts, of the 'few' derived from the Islamic/Muslim 'moderate' law-abiding ranks, not only in exactly the same space but also elsewhere informing terror-genocide.

Every murder of Other in the streets anywhere in the world occurs in our own cultural space, any counter terror in the world occurs in our own cultural space, any political subjugation of Other in the world occurs in our own cultural space. There are no more borders, there are no more Nations in fact these are simple contrivances to persuade ourselves we in essence have autonomy, agency where we have very little as Nations, groups or as individuals. Globalization determines such autonomy and agency is diminishing as globalized political elite 'gold standard' group-think policy increases control, punish dissent, where the very creators and sustainers of genocide in the streets blame everyone else except their own perfidy.

It is a dishonest contrivance which seeks in each Nation to convince citizens the 'hate preachers' source of ethics-morals-motivation-beliefs methodology the cause of genocide manifesting in our streets are external to our own space where they clearly are not the 'hate preachers' are created in our very midst framed by the ethics-morals-motivation-beliefs methodology of the Islamic/Muslim cultures construct of Other which exists in our space not external to it. 

We are at war until we "become all one thing or all the other." the choice of the current political elite are to repeat the means by which such irreconcilable significant differences in values are resolved with genocide in both directions.

I am simply suggesting there must be a better way than pretending we exist in a societal "fantastic object-lesson in how people can live together creatively and in harmony" when the broken bodies and lives in our cultures streets, in our school yards, in our cafes, in our subways, in our skyscrapers, in our battlefield, in our universities, in our Museums, in our... , as our very Democratic institutional buildings become fortresses patrolled covertly or overtly by weaponised defenders create an obscene mockery of the lie our failed cultural gate keepers tell us after each and every atrocity the very source of our terror the very ranks of the 'moderate' law-abiding from which their altruistic enforcer 'few' are created and sustained "are looking for peace and see friendship with Other as a basis for peace not only for themselves but for everyone else” as the 'few' as they have elsewhere in time and space turn into the 'many'

The truth we have to face if such a culture were really 
'looking for peace and .. friendship with Other'  there would be no terror, no broken bodies and lives no need to transform our Democratic institutions into fortresses.The point is any genocide and misogynistic cultural codex construct such as the Islamic/Muslim codex must be removed immediately if terror and increasing misogynistic behaviour are to be avoided.

"The West can no longer afford to play the compassionate democrat when it faces an enemy which respects no ethical rulebook whatsoever."
Comment: Western kindness is killing democracy JP, By ARI HAROW, RICHARD KEMP 11/23/2015

Ari Harow served as chief of staff to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu until earlier this year.

Colonel Richard Kemp was commander of British forces in Afghanistan and head of the international terrorism team in the UK Prime Minister’s Office.

Popular posts from this blog

Saudi crown prince promises 'return to moderate Islam'=Reich Minister of Propaganda of Nazi Germany promises 'return to moderate Nazism'. The Terror-Genocide Continues. A Muslim cultures dissimulating soft power in full swing despite the obvious contradiction.

It is not the quantity of immigration which is the paramount risk for maximised Liberty, Equality, Fraternity and the flourishing economic-social life which tends to result, it is the nature of the Biology/Culture Ideologies allowed within because:

”The Time Comes Where Silence is Betrayal.” Rev. Dr Martin Luther King, Jr.-Where's Wally(Ma'ruf Amin) – Mass Slaughter in Indonesia, 1965-66? Democracy to be a Democracy has to be so much more than simply an ink mark on a piece of paper.